If we restrict cosine to only where it satisfies a linear property, will it create ellipses?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
25
down vote

favorite
9












On another forum, someone asked if cosine was linear. I remarked, of course not! We know already that



$$cos(x+y) = cos x cos y - sin x sin y$$



If it were linear, we would need $$cos(x+y) = cos x + cos y$$ So, I decided to graph it.



Inside each $2pi$ square, the graph looks very much like an ellipse. But, I am more of a combinatorist, and I do not have much intuition for how to check how "ellipse-like" it is.



How would one check? Is there a substitution that could be used?



Here is the link to the Wolframalpha plot:



Wolframalpha Plot










share|cite|improve this question



















  • 1




    For the part about "why doesn't the locus contain these lines": because $cos(2pi+y)=cos y$ whereas $cos (2pi)+cos y=1+cos y$.
    – Saucy O'Path
    Aug 23 at 21:25







  • 5




    Linearity would mean $forall alpha,beta cos(alpha x + beta y)=alphacos x + beta cos y$, actually.
    – edmz
    Aug 23 at 21:32











  • I would love to see more questions like this on this site! It’s a sincere curious and interesting phenomenon that we can investigate as a community, not another workbook problem.
    – Chase Ryan Taylor
    Aug 23 at 23:09






  • 1




    Your sentence beginning with the word "obviously" is wrong. The points $(2pi m, 2pi n)$ do not solve your equation; for those points, the left side of your equation is $1$ but the right side is $2$.
    – symplectomorphic
    Aug 24 at 4:45






  • 4




    The easiest way to argue that $cos$ isn't linear is to point out $cos(0) = 1$.
    – leftaroundabout
    Aug 24 at 13:49














up vote
25
down vote

favorite
9












On another forum, someone asked if cosine was linear. I remarked, of course not! We know already that



$$cos(x+y) = cos x cos y - sin x sin y$$



If it were linear, we would need $$cos(x+y) = cos x + cos y$$ So, I decided to graph it.



Inside each $2pi$ square, the graph looks very much like an ellipse. But, I am more of a combinatorist, and I do not have much intuition for how to check how "ellipse-like" it is.



How would one check? Is there a substitution that could be used?



Here is the link to the Wolframalpha plot:



Wolframalpha Plot










share|cite|improve this question



















  • 1




    For the part about "why doesn't the locus contain these lines": because $cos(2pi+y)=cos y$ whereas $cos (2pi)+cos y=1+cos y$.
    – Saucy O'Path
    Aug 23 at 21:25







  • 5




    Linearity would mean $forall alpha,beta cos(alpha x + beta y)=alphacos x + beta cos y$, actually.
    – edmz
    Aug 23 at 21:32











  • I would love to see more questions like this on this site! It’s a sincere curious and interesting phenomenon that we can investigate as a community, not another workbook problem.
    – Chase Ryan Taylor
    Aug 23 at 23:09






  • 1




    Your sentence beginning with the word "obviously" is wrong. The points $(2pi m, 2pi n)$ do not solve your equation; for those points, the left side of your equation is $1$ but the right side is $2$.
    – symplectomorphic
    Aug 24 at 4:45






  • 4




    The easiest way to argue that $cos$ isn't linear is to point out $cos(0) = 1$.
    – leftaroundabout
    Aug 24 at 13:49












up vote
25
down vote

favorite
9









up vote
25
down vote

favorite
9






9





On another forum, someone asked if cosine was linear. I remarked, of course not! We know already that



$$cos(x+y) = cos x cos y - sin x sin y$$



If it were linear, we would need $$cos(x+y) = cos x + cos y$$ So, I decided to graph it.



Inside each $2pi$ square, the graph looks very much like an ellipse. But, I am more of a combinatorist, and I do not have much intuition for how to check how "ellipse-like" it is.



How would one check? Is there a substitution that could be used?



Here is the link to the Wolframalpha plot:



Wolframalpha Plot










share|cite|improve this question















On another forum, someone asked if cosine was linear. I remarked, of course not! We know already that



$$cos(x+y) = cos x cos y - sin x sin y$$



If it were linear, we would need $$cos(x+y) = cos x + cos y$$ So, I decided to graph it.



Inside each $2pi$ square, the graph looks very much like an ellipse. But, I am more of a combinatorist, and I do not have much intuition for how to check how "ellipse-like" it is.



How would one check? Is there a substitution that could be used?



Here is the link to the Wolframalpha plot:



Wolframalpha Plot







trigonometry graphing-functions






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Aug 24 at 14:04

























asked Aug 23 at 21:20









InterstellarProbe

3,091723




3,091723







  • 1




    For the part about "why doesn't the locus contain these lines": because $cos(2pi+y)=cos y$ whereas $cos (2pi)+cos y=1+cos y$.
    – Saucy O'Path
    Aug 23 at 21:25







  • 5




    Linearity would mean $forall alpha,beta cos(alpha x + beta y)=alphacos x + beta cos y$, actually.
    – edmz
    Aug 23 at 21:32











  • I would love to see more questions like this on this site! It’s a sincere curious and interesting phenomenon that we can investigate as a community, not another workbook problem.
    – Chase Ryan Taylor
    Aug 23 at 23:09






  • 1




    Your sentence beginning with the word "obviously" is wrong. The points $(2pi m, 2pi n)$ do not solve your equation; for those points, the left side of your equation is $1$ but the right side is $2$.
    – symplectomorphic
    Aug 24 at 4:45






  • 4




    The easiest way to argue that $cos$ isn't linear is to point out $cos(0) = 1$.
    – leftaroundabout
    Aug 24 at 13:49












  • 1




    For the part about "why doesn't the locus contain these lines": because $cos(2pi+y)=cos y$ whereas $cos (2pi)+cos y=1+cos y$.
    – Saucy O'Path
    Aug 23 at 21:25







  • 5




    Linearity would mean $forall alpha,beta cos(alpha x + beta y)=alphacos x + beta cos y$, actually.
    – edmz
    Aug 23 at 21:32











  • I would love to see more questions like this on this site! It’s a sincere curious and interesting phenomenon that we can investigate as a community, not another workbook problem.
    – Chase Ryan Taylor
    Aug 23 at 23:09






  • 1




    Your sentence beginning with the word "obviously" is wrong. The points $(2pi m, 2pi n)$ do not solve your equation; for those points, the left side of your equation is $1$ but the right side is $2$.
    – symplectomorphic
    Aug 24 at 4:45






  • 4




    The easiest way to argue that $cos$ isn't linear is to point out $cos(0) = 1$.
    – leftaroundabout
    Aug 24 at 13:49







1




1




For the part about "why doesn't the locus contain these lines": because $cos(2pi+y)=cos y$ whereas $cos (2pi)+cos y=1+cos y$.
– Saucy O'Path
Aug 23 at 21:25





For the part about "why doesn't the locus contain these lines": because $cos(2pi+y)=cos y$ whereas $cos (2pi)+cos y=1+cos y$.
– Saucy O'Path
Aug 23 at 21:25





5




5




Linearity would mean $forall alpha,beta cos(alpha x + beta y)=alphacos x + beta cos y$, actually.
– edmz
Aug 23 at 21:32





Linearity would mean $forall alpha,beta cos(alpha x + beta y)=alphacos x + beta cos y$, actually.
– edmz
Aug 23 at 21:32













I would love to see more questions like this on this site! It’s a sincere curious and interesting phenomenon that we can investigate as a community, not another workbook problem.
– Chase Ryan Taylor
Aug 23 at 23:09




I would love to see more questions like this on this site! It’s a sincere curious and interesting phenomenon that we can investigate as a community, not another workbook problem.
– Chase Ryan Taylor
Aug 23 at 23:09




1




1




Your sentence beginning with the word "obviously" is wrong. The points $(2pi m, 2pi n)$ do not solve your equation; for those points, the left side of your equation is $1$ but the right side is $2$.
– symplectomorphic
Aug 24 at 4:45




Your sentence beginning with the word "obviously" is wrong. The points $(2pi m, 2pi n)$ do not solve your equation; for those points, the left side of your equation is $1$ but the right side is $2$.
– symplectomorphic
Aug 24 at 4:45




4




4




The easiest way to argue that $cos$ isn't linear is to point out $cos(0) = 1$.
– leftaroundabout
Aug 24 at 13:49




The easiest way to argue that $cos$ isn't linear is to point out $cos(0) = 1$.
– leftaroundabout
Aug 24 at 13:49










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
12
down vote



accepted










The graph suggests that we may simplify the problem by rotating the coordinate axes in the anti-clockwise direction (or clockwise, but let's just choose to go anti-clockwise).



(Indeed, note that for every solution $(a, b)$, $(b, a)$ is also a solution. So the graph is symmetric along the line $x=y$. Rotating thus makes the solution in the new basis symmetric along x=0)



The forward transformations are:



$$x' = xcos(fracpi 4) + ysin(fracpi 4)$$
$$y' = -xsin(fracpi 4) + ycos(fracpi 4)$$



This transforms the equation as you gave it to:
$$cos(sqrt2y') = cosleft ( frac1sqrt2 left ( x'+y' right ) right ) + cosleft ( frac1sqrt2 left ( -x'+y' right ) right )$$



We derive the equation of the ellipse immediately above the origin, assuming it exists, and show that it contains points not in the solution set to the above equation.



We first determine the semi-minor's length by finding the first two positive solutions to the above equation where $x'=0$, i.e. to:



$$cos(sqrt2y') = 2cosleft ( frac1sqrt2 y' right )$$



Skipping the details, the two sought-for solutions are $(x'_1, y_1')= (0, sqrt2 cos^-1left ( frac1-sqrt32 right ))$ and $(x'_2, y'_2) = (0, sqrt2left (2pi - cos^-1left ( frac1-sqrt32 right ) right ))$. The semi minor's length is therefore $sqrt2left ( cos^-1left ( frac1-sqrt32 right )- pi right ) $.



We continue the same process for the semi-major axis. This gives $(x_3', y_3') = (frac2sqrt2pi 3, 0)$ and $(x_4', y_4') = (-frac2sqrt2pi 3, 0)$.



The equation of the ellipse above the origin, in the rotated coordinate system is:



$$left ( frac3x'2sqrt2pi right ) ^2 + left ( fracy'-sqrt2pi sqrt2left ( cos^-1left ( frac1-sqrt32 right )- pi right) right )^2 = 1$$



By trying different values of $x'$ and $y'$, one can check that the above does not always imply



$$cos(sqrt2y') = cosleft ( frac1sqrt2 left ( x'+y' right ) right ) + cosleft ( frac1sqrt2 left ( -x'+y' right ) right )$$



So the curves you see in the picture aren't exactly rotated ellipses. But they sure are close.






share|cite|improve this answer





























    up vote
    27
    down vote













    So the question is about the shape of $ (x,y)in[0,2pi]^2 : cos(x+y)=cos(x)+cos(y) $.



    The equation can be written as $2cos^2left(fracx+y2right)-1 = 2cosleft(fracx+y2right)cosleft(fracx-y2right) $, so the problem boils down to studying the shape of $cos^2(v)+cos(u)cos(v)=frac12$ for $uin[0,pi]$ and $vinleft[0,fracpi2right]$. By Maclaurin series and interpolation, such locus is extremely close to the ellipse having equation
    $$ 3v^2+u^2=frac7pi^216 $$
    which is represented by the purple curve below:



    enter image description here



    where the external blue curve is part of the locus $cos^2(v)+cos(u)cos(v)=frac12$.

    On its turn the blue curve is tangent to the ellipse $3v^2+u^2=frac4pi^29$.



    By comparing the enclosed areas we should get a non-trivial inequality for a complete elliptic integral.






    share|cite|improve this answer






















    • “The equation can . . .” How come?
      – Chase Ryan Taylor
      Aug 23 at 23:15











    • @ChaseRyanTaylor: basic trigonometry. $cos(x)=2cos^2fracx2-1$ and $cos(x)+cos(y)=2cosfracx+y2cosfracx-y2$.
      – Jack D'Aurizio♦
      Aug 23 at 23:16






    • 2




      This answer is very detailed, and I wanted to mark it as an answer, but the other answer finds the ellipse with geometry that has the same major and minor axes and rules it out in a bit of an easier fashion. Your response definitely lets me know that it would be extremely nontrivial to evaluate how close or far it is from that ellipse (you say non-trivial, and I will take your word for it, haha)
      – InterstellarProbe
      Aug 24 at 11:40






    • 1




      @InterstellarProbe: by comparing the terms $frac7pi^216$ and $frac4pi^29$ we may say that we are close to an ellipse with an error $<1.6%$.
      – Jack D'Aurizio♦
      Aug 24 at 16:56










    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2892571%2fif-we-restrict-cosine-to-only-where-it-satisfies-a-linear-property-will-it-crea%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    12
    down vote



    accepted










    The graph suggests that we may simplify the problem by rotating the coordinate axes in the anti-clockwise direction (or clockwise, but let's just choose to go anti-clockwise).



    (Indeed, note that for every solution $(a, b)$, $(b, a)$ is also a solution. So the graph is symmetric along the line $x=y$. Rotating thus makes the solution in the new basis symmetric along x=0)



    The forward transformations are:



    $$x' = xcos(fracpi 4) + ysin(fracpi 4)$$
    $$y' = -xsin(fracpi 4) + ycos(fracpi 4)$$



    This transforms the equation as you gave it to:
    $$cos(sqrt2y') = cosleft ( frac1sqrt2 left ( x'+y' right ) right ) + cosleft ( frac1sqrt2 left ( -x'+y' right ) right )$$



    We derive the equation of the ellipse immediately above the origin, assuming it exists, and show that it contains points not in the solution set to the above equation.



    We first determine the semi-minor's length by finding the first two positive solutions to the above equation where $x'=0$, i.e. to:



    $$cos(sqrt2y') = 2cosleft ( frac1sqrt2 y' right )$$



    Skipping the details, the two sought-for solutions are $(x'_1, y_1')= (0, sqrt2 cos^-1left ( frac1-sqrt32 right ))$ and $(x'_2, y'_2) = (0, sqrt2left (2pi - cos^-1left ( frac1-sqrt32 right ) right ))$. The semi minor's length is therefore $sqrt2left ( cos^-1left ( frac1-sqrt32 right )- pi right ) $.



    We continue the same process for the semi-major axis. This gives $(x_3', y_3') = (frac2sqrt2pi 3, 0)$ and $(x_4', y_4') = (-frac2sqrt2pi 3, 0)$.



    The equation of the ellipse above the origin, in the rotated coordinate system is:



    $$left ( frac3x'2sqrt2pi right ) ^2 + left ( fracy'-sqrt2pi sqrt2left ( cos^-1left ( frac1-sqrt32 right )- pi right) right )^2 = 1$$



    By trying different values of $x'$ and $y'$, one can check that the above does not always imply



    $$cos(sqrt2y') = cosleft ( frac1sqrt2 left ( x'+y' right ) right ) + cosleft ( frac1sqrt2 left ( -x'+y' right ) right )$$



    So the curves you see in the picture aren't exactly rotated ellipses. But they sure are close.






    share|cite|improve this answer


























      up vote
      12
      down vote



      accepted










      The graph suggests that we may simplify the problem by rotating the coordinate axes in the anti-clockwise direction (or clockwise, but let's just choose to go anti-clockwise).



      (Indeed, note that for every solution $(a, b)$, $(b, a)$ is also a solution. So the graph is symmetric along the line $x=y$. Rotating thus makes the solution in the new basis symmetric along x=0)



      The forward transformations are:



      $$x' = xcos(fracpi 4) + ysin(fracpi 4)$$
      $$y' = -xsin(fracpi 4) + ycos(fracpi 4)$$



      This transforms the equation as you gave it to:
      $$cos(sqrt2y') = cosleft ( frac1sqrt2 left ( x'+y' right ) right ) + cosleft ( frac1sqrt2 left ( -x'+y' right ) right )$$



      We derive the equation of the ellipse immediately above the origin, assuming it exists, and show that it contains points not in the solution set to the above equation.



      We first determine the semi-minor's length by finding the first two positive solutions to the above equation where $x'=0$, i.e. to:



      $$cos(sqrt2y') = 2cosleft ( frac1sqrt2 y' right )$$



      Skipping the details, the two sought-for solutions are $(x'_1, y_1')= (0, sqrt2 cos^-1left ( frac1-sqrt32 right ))$ and $(x'_2, y'_2) = (0, sqrt2left (2pi - cos^-1left ( frac1-sqrt32 right ) right ))$. The semi minor's length is therefore $sqrt2left ( cos^-1left ( frac1-sqrt32 right )- pi right ) $.



      We continue the same process for the semi-major axis. This gives $(x_3', y_3') = (frac2sqrt2pi 3, 0)$ and $(x_4', y_4') = (-frac2sqrt2pi 3, 0)$.



      The equation of the ellipse above the origin, in the rotated coordinate system is:



      $$left ( frac3x'2sqrt2pi right ) ^2 + left ( fracy'-sqrt2pi sqrt2left ( cos^-1left ( frac1-sqrt32 right )- pi right) right )^2 = 1$$



      By trying different values of $x'$ and $y'$, one can check that the above does not always imply



      $$cos(sqrt2y') = cosleft ( frac1sqrt2 left ( x'+y' right ) right ) + cosleft ( frac1sqrt2 left ( -x'+y' right ) right )$$



      So the curves you see in the picture aren't exactly rotated ellipses. But they sure are close.






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        up vote
        12
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        12
        down vote



        accepted






        The graph suggests that we may simplify the problem by rotating the coordinate axes in the anti-clockwise direction (or clockwise, but let's just choose to go anti-clockwise).



        (Indeed, note that for every solution $(a, b)$, $(b, a)$ is also a solution. So the graph is symmetric along the line $x=y$. Rotating thus makes the solution in the new basis symmetric along x=0)



        The forward transformations are:



        $$x' = xcos(fracpi 4) + ysin(fracpi 4)$$
        $$y' = -xsin(fracpi 4) + ycos(fracpi 4)$$



        This transforms the equation as you gave it to:
        $$cos(sqrt2y') = cosleft ( frac1sqrt2 left ( x'+y' right ) right ) + cosleft ( frac1sqrt2 left ( -x'+y' right ) right )$$



        We derive the equation of the ellipse immediately above the origin, assuming it exists, and show that it contains points not in the solution set to the above equation.



        We first determine the semi-minor's length by finding the first two positive solutions to the above equation where $x'=0$, i.e. to:



        $$cos(sqrt2y') = 2cosleft ( frac1sqrt2 y' right )$$



        Skipping the details, the two sought-for solutions are $(x'_1, y_1')= (0, sqrt2 cos^-1left ( frac1-sqrt32 right ))$ and $(x'_2, y'_2) = (0, sqrt2left (2pi - cos^-1left ( frac1-sqrt32 right ) right ))$. The semi minor's length is therefore $sqrt2left ( cos^-1left ( frac1-sqrt32 right )- pi right ) $.



        We continue the same process for the semi-major axis. This gives $(x_3', y_3') = (frac2sqrt2pi 3, 0)$ and $(x_4', y_4') = (-frac2sqrt2pi 3, 0)$.



        The equation of the ellipse above the origin, in the rotated coordinate system is:



        $$left ( frac3x'2sqrt2pi right ) ^2 + left ( fracy'-sqrt2pi sqrt2left ( cos^-1left ( frac1-sqrt32 right )- pi right) right )^2 = 1$$



        By trying different values of $x'$ and $y'$, one can check that the above does not always imply



        $$cos(sqrt2y') = cosleft ( frac1sqrt2 left ( x'+y' right ) right ) + cosleft ( frac1sqrt2 left ( -x'+y' right ) right )$$



        So the curves you see in the picture aren't exactly rotated ellipses. But they sure are close.






        share|cite|improve this answer














        The graph suggests that we may simplify the problem by rotating the coordinate axes in the anti-clockwise direction (or clockwise, but let's just choose to go anti-clockwise).



        (Indeed, note that for every solution $(a, b)$, $(b, a)$ is also a solution. So the graph is symmetric along the line $x=y$. Rotating thus makes the solution in the new basis symmetric along x=0)



        The forward transformations are:



        $$x' = xcos(fracpi 4) + ysin(fracpi 4)$$
        $$y' = -xsin(fracpi 4) + ycos(fracpi 4)$$



        This transforms the equation as you gave it to:
        $$cos(sqrt2y') = cosleft ( frac1sqrt2 left ( x'+y' right ) right ) + cosleft ( frac1sqrt2 left ( -x'+y' right ) right )$$



        We derive the equation of the ellipse immediately above the origin, assuming it exists, and show that it contains points not in the solution set to the above equation.



        We first determine the semi-minor's length by finding the first two positive solutions to the above equation where $x'=0$, i.e. to:



        $$cos(sqrt2y') = 2cosleft ( frac1sqrt2 y' right )$$



        Skipping the details, the two sought-for solutions are $(x'_1, y_1')= (0, sqrt2 cos^-1left ( frac1-sqrt32 right ))$ and $(x'_2, y'_2) = (0, sqrt2left (2pi - cos^-1left ( frac1-sqrt32 right ) right ))$. The semi minor's length is therefore $sqrt2left ( cos^-1left ( frac1-sqrt32 right )- pi right ) $.



        We continue the same process for the semi-major axis. This gives $(x_3', y_3') = (frac2sqrt2pi 3, 0)$ and $(x_4', y_4') = (-frac2sqrt2pi 3, 0)$.



        The equation of the ellipse above the origin, in the rotated coordinate system is:



        $$left ( frac3x'2sqrt2pi right ) ^2 + left ( fracy'-sqrt2pi sqrt2left ( cos^-1left ( frac1-sqrt32 right )- pi right) right )^2 = 1$$



        By trying different values of $x'$ and $y'$, one can check that the above does not always imply



        $$cos(sqrt2y') = cosleft ( frac1sqrt2 left ( x'+y' right ) right ) + cosleft ( frac1sqrt2 left ( -x'+y' right ) right )$$



        So the curves you see in the picture aren't exactly rotated ellipses. But they sure are close.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Aug 24 at 14:49

























        answered Aug 23 at 22:34









        LPenguin

        2016




        2016




















            up vote
            27
            down vote













            So the question is about the shape of $ (x,y)in[0,2pi]^2 : cos(x+y)=cos(x)+cos(y) $.



            The equation can be written as $2cos^2left(fracx+y2right)-1 = 2cosleft(fracx+y2right)cosleft(fracx-y2right) $, so the problem boils down to studying the shape of $cos^2(v)+cos(u)cos(v)=frac12$ for $uin[0,pi]$ and $vinleft[0,fracpi2right]$. By Maclaurin series and interpolation, such locus is extremely close to the ellipse having equation
            $$ 3v^2+u^2=frac7pi^216 $$
            which is represented by the purple curve below:



            enter image description here



            where the external blue curve is part of the locus $cos^2(v)+cos(u)cos(v)=frac12$.

            On its turn the blue curve is tangent to the ellipse $3v^2+u^2=frac4pi^29$.



            By comparing the enclosed areas we should get a non-trivial inequality for a complete elliptic integral.






            share|cite|improve this answer






















            • “The equation can . . .” How come?
              – Chase Ryan Taylor
              Aug 23 at 23:15











            • @ChaseRyanTaylor: basic trigonometry. $cos(x)=2cos^2fracx2-1$ and $cos(x)+cos(y)=2cosfracx+y2cosfracx-y2$.
              – Jack D'Aurizio♦
              Aug 23 at 23:16






            • 2




              This answer is very detailed, and I wanted to mark it as an answer, but the other answer finds the ellipse with geometry that has the same major and minor axes and rules it out in a bit of an easier fashion. Your response definitely lets me know that it would be extremely nontrivial to evaluate how close or far it is from that ellipse (you say non-trivial, and I will take your word for it, haha)
              – InterstellarProbe
              Aug 24 at 11:40






            • 1




              @InterstellarProbe: by comparing the terms $frac7pi^216$ and $frac4pi^29$ we may say that we are close to an ellipse with an error $<1.6%$.
              – Jack D'Aurizio♦
              Aug 24 at 16:56














            up vote
            27
            down vote













            So the question is about the shape of $ (x,y)in[0,2pi]^2 : cos(x+y)=cos(x)+cos(y) $.



            The equation can be written as $2cos^2left(fracx+y2right)-1 = 2cosleft(fracx+y2right)cosleft(fracx-y2right) $, so the problem boils down to studying the shape of $cos^2(v)+cos(u)cos(v)=frac12$ for $uin[0,pi]$ and $vinleft[0,fracpi2right]$. By Maclaurin series and interpolation, such locus is extremely close to the ellipse having equation
            $$ 3v^2+u^2=frac7pi^216 $$
            which is represented by the purple curve below:



            enter image description here



            where the external blue curve is part of the locus $cos^2(v)+cos(u)cos(v)=frac12$.

            On its turn the blue curve is tangent to the ellipse $3v^2+u^2=frac4pi^29$.



            By comparing the enclosed areas we should get a non-trivial inequality for a complete elliptic integral.






            share|cite|improve this answer






















            • “The equation can . . .” How come?
              – Chase Ryan Taylor
              Aug 23 at 23:15











            • @ChaseRyanTaylor: basic trigonometry. $cos(x)=2cos^2fracx2-1$ and $cos(x)+cos(y)=2cosfracx+y2cosfracx-y2$.
              – Jack D'Aurizio♦
              Aug 23 at 23:16






            • 2




              This answer is very detailed, and I wanted to mark it as an answer, but the other answer finds the ellipse with geometry that has the same major and minor axes and rules it out in a bit of an easier fashion. Your response definitely lets me know that it would be extremely nontrivial to evaluate how close or far it is from that ellipse (you say non-trivial, and I will take your word for it, haha)
              – InterstellarProbe
              Aug 24 at 11:40






            • 1




              @InterstellarProbe: by comparing the terms $frac7pi^216$ and $frac4pi^29$ we may say that we are close to an ellipse with an error $<1.6%$.
              – Jack D'Aurizio♦
              Aug 24 at 16:56












            up vote
            27
            down vote










            up vote
            27
            down vote









            So the question is about the shape of $ (x,y)in[0,2pi]^2 : cos(x+y)=cos(x)+cos(y) $.



            The equation can be written as $2cos^2left(fracx+y2right)-1 = 2cosleft(fracx+y2right)cosleft(fracx-y2right) $, so the problem boils down to studying the shape of $cos^2(v)+cos(u)cos(v)=frac12$ for $uin[0,pi]$ and $vinleft[0,fracpi2right]$. By Maclaurin series and interpolation, such locus is extremely close to the ellipse having equation
            $$ 3v^2+u^2=frac7pi^216 $$
            which is represented by the purple curve below:



            enter image description here



            where the external blue curve is part of the locus $cos^2(v)+cos(u)cos(v)=frac12$.

            On its turn the blue curve is tangent to the ellipse $3v^2+u^2=frac4pi^29$.



            By comparing the enclosed areas we should get a non-trivial inequality for a complete elliptic integral.






            share|cite|improve this answer














            So the question is about the shape of $ (x,y)in[0,2pi]^2 : cos(x+y)=cos(x)+cos(y) $.



            The equation can be written as $2cos^2left(fracx+y2right)-1 = 2cosleft(fracx+y2right)cosleft(fracx-y2right) $, so the problem boils down to studying the shape of $cos^2(v)+cos(u)cos(v)=frac12$ for $uin[0,pi]$ and $vinleft[0,fracpi2right]$. By Maclaurin series and interpolation, such locus is extremely close to the ellipse having equation
            $$ 3v^2+u^2=frac7pi^216 $$
            which is represented by the purple curve below:



            enter image description here



            where the external blue curve is part of the locus $cos^2(v)+cos(u)cos(v)=frac12$.

            On its turn the blue curve is tangent to the ellipse $3v^2+u^2=frac4pi^29$.



            By comparing the enclosed areas we should get a non-trivial inequality for a complete elliptic integral.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Aug 23 at 22:00

























            answered Aug 23 at 21:48









            Jack D'Aurizio♦

            275k32268640




            275k32268640











            • “The equation can . . .” How come?
              – Chase Ryan Taylor
              Aug 23 at 23:15











            • @ChaseRyanTaylor: basic trigonometry. $cos(x)=2cos^2fracx2-1$ and $cos(x)+cos(y)=2cosfracx+y2cosfracx-y2$.
              – Jack D'Aurizio♦
              Aug 23 at 23:16






            • 2




              This answer is very detailed, and I wanted to mark it as an answer, but the other answer finds the ellipse with geometry that has the same major and minor axes and rules it out in a bit of an easier fashion. Your response definitely lets me know that it would be extremely nontrivial to evaluate how close or far it is from that ellipse (you say non-trivial, and I will take your word for it, haha)
              – InterstellarProbe
              Aug 24 at 11:40






            • 1




              @InterstellarProbe: by comparing the terms $frac7pi^216$ and $frac4pi^29$ we may say that we are close to an ellipse with an error $<1.6%$.
              – Jack D'Aurizio♦
              Aug 24 at 16:56
















            • “The equation can . . .” How come?
              – Chase Ryan Taylor
              Aug 23 at 23:15











            • @ChaseRyanTaylor: basic trigonometry. $cos(x)=2cos^2fracx2-1$ and $cos(x)+cos(y)=2cosfracx+y2cosfracx-y2$.
              – Jack D'Aurizio♦
              Aug 23 at 23:16






            • 2




              This answer is very detailed, and I wanted to mark it as an answer, but the other answer finds the ellipse with geometry that has the same major and minor axes and rules it out in a bit of an easier fashion. Your response definitely lets me know that it would be extremely nontrivial to evaluate how close or far it is from that ellipse (you say non-trivial, and I will take your word for it, haha)
              – InterstellarProbe
              Aug 24 at 11:40






            • 1




              @InterstellarProbe: by comparing the terms $frac7pi^216$ and $frac4pi^29$ we may say that we are close to an ellipse with an error $<1.6%$.
              – Jack D'Aurizio♦
              Aug 24 at 16:56















            “The equation can . . .” How come?
            – Chase Ryan Taylor
            Aug 23 at 23:15





            “The equation can . . .” How come?
            – Chase Ryan Taylor
            Aug 23 at 23:15













            @ChaseRyanTaylor: basic trigonometry. $cos(x)=2cos^2fracx2-1$ and $cos(x)+cos(y)=2cosfracx+y2cosfracx-y2$.
            – Jack D'Aurizio♦
            Aug 23 at 23:16




            @ChaseRyanTaylor: basic trigonometry. $cos(x)=2cos^2fracx2-1$ and $cos(x)+cos(y)=2cosfracx+y2cosfracx-y2$.
            – Jack D'Aurizio♦
            Aug 23 at 23:16




            2




            2




            This answer is very detailed, and I wanted to mark it as an answer, but the other answer finds the ellipse with geometry that has the same major and minor axes and rules it out in a bit of an easier fashion. Your response definitely lets me know that it would be extremely nontrivial to evaluate how close or far it is from that ellipse (you say non-trivial, and I will take your word for it, haha)
            – InterstellarProbe
            Aug 24 at 11:40




            This answer is very detailed, and I wanted to mark it as an answer, but the other answer finds the ellipse with geometry that has the same major and minor axes and rules it out in a bit of an easier fashion. Your response definitely lets me know that it would be extremely nontrivial to evaluate how close or far it is from that ellipse (you say non-trivial, and I will take your word for it, haha)
            – InterstellarProbe
            Aug 24 at 11:40




            1




            1




            @InterstellarProbe: by comparing the terms $frac7pi^216$ and $frac4pi^29$ we may say that we are close to an ellipse with an error $<1.6%$.
            – Jack D'Aurizio♦
            Aug 24 at 16:56




            @InterstellarProbe: by comparing the terms $frac7pi^216$ and $frac4pi^29$ we may say that we are close to an ellipse with an error $<1.6%$.
            – Jack D'Aurizio♦
            Aug 24 at 16:56

















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2892571%2fif-we-restrict-cosine-to-only-where-it-satisfies-a-linear-property-will-it-crea%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            Popular posts from this blog

            How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

            Bahrain

            Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay