Repeated ârsyslogd-2007: action 'action 18' suspendedâ

Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I haven't looked at my /var/log/messages in a while. It turns out to be full of messages like
Dec 23 06:27:01 ifs-web rsyslogd-2359: action 'action 18' resumed (module 'builtin:ompipe') [try http://www.rsyslog.com/e/2359 ]
Dec 23 07:17:01 ifs-web rsyslogd-2007: action 'action 18' suspended, next retry is Wed Dec 23 07:17:31 2015 [try http://www.rsyslog.com/e/2007 ]
This means very little to me - I don't know what 'action 18' means. How can I trace this further to try and find the source of the problem?
debian rsyslog
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I haven't looked at my /var/log/messages in a while. It turns out to be full of messages like
Dec 23 06:27:01 ifs-web rsyslogd-2359: action 'action 18' resumed (module 'builtin:ompipe') [try http://www.rsyslog.com/e/2359 ]
Dec 23 07:17:01 ifs-web rsyslogd-2007: action 'action 18' suspended, next retry is Wed Dec 23 07:17:31 2015 [try http://www.rsyslog.com/e/2007 ]
This means very little to me - I don't know what 'action 18' means. How can I trace this further to try and find the source of the problem?
debian rsyslog
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I haven't looked at my /var/log/messages in a while. It turns out to be full of messages like
Dec 23 06:27:01 ifs-web rsyslogd-2359: action 'action 18' resumed (module 'builtin:ompipe') [try http://www.rsyslog.com/e/2359 ]
Dec 23 07:17:01 ifs-web rsyslogd-2007: action 'action 18' suspended, next retry is Wed Dec 23 07:17:31 2015 [try http://www.rsyslog.com/e/2007 ]
This means very little to me - I don't know what 'action 18' means. How can I trace this further to try and find the source of the problem?
debian rsyslog
I haven't looked at my /var/log/messages in a while. It turns out to be full of messages like
Dec 23 06:27:01 ifs-web rsyslogd-2359: action 'action 18' resumed (module 'builtin:ompipe') [try http://www.rsyslog.com/e/2359 ]
Dec 23 07:17:01 ifs-web rsyslogd-2007: action 'action 18' suspended, next retry is Wed Dec 23 07:17:31 2015 [try http://www.rsyslog.com/e/2007 ]
This means very little to me - I don't know what 'action 18' means. How can I trace this further to try and find the source of the problem?
debian rsyslog
edited Nov 12 '17 at 16:56
asked Nov 12 '17 at 16:39
sourcejedi
19.5k32681
19.5k32681
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
The URL http://www.rsyslog.com/e/2007 shown in the second message, takes you to an informative thread.
Let's ignore the "Full Description" that says this status should never be exposed to users and indicates a programming bug. It appears that there has been some behaviour change in rsyslog and this is now exposed. But it can be worked around.
Is there anywhere I can find out what action 18 is or how to debug what the issue is?
You can name actions (name="xxx" attribute). If not named, rsyslog counts them, in load order, and assigned a name "action-", so this is the 18th action in load order.
I would guess that it is a distro-default of writing to the xconsole pipe, which actually does not exist because it is not used. If so, you can simply remove that line from rsyslog.conf. Some distros do this by default, and as we get write errors, we need to report them as usual.
Another clue here is the module 'builtin:ompipe' in the resume message (i.e. it's trying to write to a pipe here, not an ordinary log file).
I was indeed running Debian Jessie, which is mentioned in the thread as having this configuration by default. And the action number corresponded to the xconsole line.
In more recent versions of Debian the xconsole line has been removed. The fix is introduced in version 8.14.0-2 of the Debian rsyslog package. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=745492#25
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
The URL http://www.rsyslog.com/e/2007 shown in the second message, takes you to an informative thread.
Let's ignore the "Full Description" that says this status should never be exposed to users and indicates a programming bug. It appears that there has been some behaviour change in rsyslog and this is now exposed. But it can be worked around.
Is there anywhere I can find out what action 18 is or how to debug what the issue is?
You can name actions (name="xxx" attribute). If not named, rsyslog counts them, in load order, and assigned a name "action-", so this is the 18th action in load order.
I would guess that it is a distro-default of writing to the xconsole pipe, which actually does not exist because it is not used. If so, you can simply remove that line from rsyslog.conf. Some distros do this by default, and as we get write errors, we need to report them as usual.
Another clue here is the module 'builtin:ompipe' in the resume message (i.e. it's trying to write to a pipe here, not an ordinary log file).
I was indeed running Debian Jessie, which is mentioned in the thread as having this configuration by default. And the action number corresponded to the xconsole line.
In more recent versions of Debian the xconsole line has been removed. The fix is introduced in version 8.14.0-2 of the Debian rsyslog package. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=745492#25
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
The URL http://www.rsyslog.com/e/2007 shown in the second message, takes you to an informative thread.
Let's ignore the "Full Description" that says this status should never be exposed to users and indicates a programming bug. It appears that there has been some behaviour change in rsyslog and this is now exposed. But it can be worked around.
Is there anywhere I can find out what action 18 is or how to debug what the issue is?
You can name actions (name="xxx" attribute). If not named, rsyslog counts them, in load order, and assigned a name "action-", so this is the 18th action in load order.
I would guess that it is a distro-default of writing to the xconsole pipe, which actually does not exist because it is not used. If so, you can simply remove that line from rsyslog.conf. Some distros do this by default, and as we get write errors, we need to report them as usual.
Another clue here is the module 'builtin:ompipe' in the resume message (i.e. it's trying to write to a pipe here, not an ordinary log file).
I was indeed running Debian Jessie, which is mentioned in the thread as having this configuration by default. And the action number corresponded to the xconsole line.
In more recent versions of Debian the xconsole line has been removed. The fix is introduced in version 8.14.0-2 of the Debian rsyslog package. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=745492#25
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
The URL http://www.rsyslog.com/e/2007 shown in the second message, takes you to an informative thread.
Let's ignore the "Full Description" that says this status should never be exposed to users and indicates a programming bug. It appears that there has been some behaviour change in rsyslog and this is now exposed. But it can be worked around.
Is there anywhere I can find out what action 18 is or how to debug what the issue is?
You can name actions (name="xxx" attribute). If not named, rsyslog counts them, in load order, and assigned a name "action-", so this is the 18th action in load order.
I would guess that it is a distro-default of writing to the xconsole pipe, which actually does not exist because it is not used. If so, you can simply remove that line from rsyslog.conf. Some distros do this by default, and as we get write errors, we need to report them as usual.
Another clue here is the module 'builtin:ompipe' in the resume message (i.e. it's trying to write to a pipe here, not an ordinary log file).
I was indeed running Debian Jessie, which is mentioned in the thread as having this configuration by default. And the action number corresponded to the xconsole line.
In more recent versions of Debian the xconsole line has been removed. The fix is introduced in version 8.14.0-2 of the Debian rsyslog package. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=745492#25
The URL http://www.rsyslog.com/e/2007 shown in the second message, takes you to an informative thread.
Let's ignore the "Full Description" that says this status should never be exposed to users and indicates a programming bug. It appears that there has been some behaviour change in rsyslog and this is now exposed. But it can be worked around.
Is there anywhere I can find out what action 18 is or how to debug what the issue is?
You can name actions (name="xxx" attribute). If not named, rsyslog counts them, in load order, and assigned a name "action-", so this is the 18th action in load order.
I would guess that it is a distro-default of writing to the xconsole pipe, which actually does not exist because it is not used. If so, you can simply remove that line from rsyslog.conf. Some distros do this by default, and as we get write errors, we need to report them as usual.
Another clue here is the module 'builtin:ompipe' in the resume message (i.e. it's trying to write to a pipe here, not an ordinary log file).
I was indeed running Debian Jessie, which is mentioned in the thread as having this configuration by default. And the action number corresponded to the xconsole line.
In more recent versions of Debian the xconsole line has been removed. The fix is introduced in version 8.14.0-2 of the Debian rsyslog package. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=745492#25
edited Nov 12 '17 at 16:52
answered Nov 12 '17 at 16:39
sourcejedi
19.5k32681
19.5k32681
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f404070%2frepeated-rsyslogd-2007-action-action-18-suspended%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password