multiple interfaces (PPPoE & tunnel) traffic shaped over single ADSL

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Physical setup:



LAN-(eth0/eth1-br0) Linux (eth2) - ADSL_bridge - WAN



  • ADSL_bridge connected to ~13Mbit down, ~1Mbit up ADSL link

  • eth2 100Mbit ethernet

  • br0 gigabit LAN and WiFi router connected

  • Linux: gateway and a secondary file server

On the linux gateway, I have:



  • PPP1 - default route cost 10

  • PPP7 - default route cost 70 fail-over and specific site access

  • PPP8 - default route cost 80 fail-over and specific site access

  • HE IPv6 tunnel (routed over active default route)

  • OpenVPN tunnel (routed over active default)

  • tinc "mess" network (routed over active default)

Problem statement:



Whenever I have heavy uploads (dropbox/hubic/googledrive/icloud/smtp/sftp/etc.) the downloads are just about non-existent.



For the initial issue, I'll just need to throttle/QoS any big non-ACK packets, that goes out over the HE & the PPP1 interfaces, but I haven't yet see how to "merge" the traffic from the HE interface into the bandwidth of the PPP1 interface.



Should I perhaps setup an extra routing "hop"/link/table to have a single throttling interface for the Linux gateway? A minimum VM to do the routing/tunnels over Eth2, and the gateway to then do shaping/etc. on the link between VM & host?






linux networking tc traffic-shaping







share|improve this question



























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    Physical setup:



    LAN-(eth0/eth1-br0) Linux (eth2) - ADSL_bridge - WAN



    • ADSL_bridge connected to ~13Mbit down, ~1Mbit up ADSL link

    • eth2 100Mbit ethernet

    • br0 gigabit LAN and WiFi router connected

    • Linux: gateway and a secondary file server

    On the linux gateway, I have:



    • PPP1 - default route cost 10

    • PPP7 - default route cost 70 fail-over and specific site access

    • PPP8 - default route cost 80 fail-over and specific site access

    • HE IPv6 tunnel (routed over active default route)

    • OpenVPN tunnel (routed over active default)

    • tinc "mess" network (routed over active default)

    Problem statement:



    Whenever I have heavy uploads (dropbox/hubic/googledrive/icloud/smtp/sftp/etc.) the downloads are just about non-existent.



    For the initial issue, I'll just need to throttle/QoS any big non-ACK packets, that goes out over the HE & the PPP1 interfaces, but I haven't yet see how to "merge" the traffic from the HE interface into the bandwidth of the PPP1 interface.



    Should I perhaps setup an extra routing "hop"/link/table to have a single throttling interface for the Linux gateway? A minimum VM to do the routing/tunnels over Eth2, and the gateway to then do shaping/etc. on the link between VM & host?






    linux networking tc traffic-shaping







    share|improve this question

























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      Physical setup:



      LAN-(eth0/eth1-br0) Linux (eth2) - ADSL_bridge - WAN



      • ADSL_bridge connected to ~13Mbit down, ~1Mbit up ADSL link

      • eth2 100Mbit ethernet

      • br0 gigabit LAN and WiFi router connected

      • Linux: gateway and a secondary file server

      On the linux gateway, I have:



      • PPP1 - default route cost 10

      • PPP7 - default route cost 70 fail-over and specific site access

      • PPP8 - default route cost 80 fail-over and specific site access

      • HE IPv6 tunnel (routed over active default route)

      • OpenVPN tunnel (routed over active default)

      • tinc "mess" network (routed over active default)

      Problem statement:



      Whenever I have heavy uploads (dropbox/hubic/googledrive/icloud/smtp/sftp/etc.) the downloads are just about non-existent.



      For the initial issue, I'll just need to throttle/QoS any big non-ACK packets, that goes out over the HE & the PPP1 interfaces, but I haven't yet see how to "merge" the traffic from the HE interface into the bandwidth of the PPP1 interface.



      Should I perhaps setup an extra routing "hop"/link/table to have a single throttling interface for the Linux gateway? A minimum VM to do the routing/tunnels over Eth2, and the gateway to then do shaping/etc. on the link between VM & host?






      linux networking tc traffic-shaping







      share|improve this question















      Physical setup:



      LAN-(eth0/eth1-br0) Linux (eth2) - ADSL_bridge - WAN



      • ADSL_bridge connected to ~13Mbit down, ~1Mbit up ADSL link

      • eth2 100Mbit ethernet

      • br0 gigabit LAN and WiFi router connected

      • Linux: gateway and a secondary file server

      On the linux gateway, I have:



      • PPP1 - default route cost 10

      • PPP7 - default route cost 70 fail-over and specific site access

      • PPP8 - default route cost 80 fail-over and specific site access

      • HE IPv6 tunnel (routed over active default route)

      • OpenVPN tunnel (routed over active default)

      • tinc "mess" network (routed over active default)

      Problem statement:



      Whenever I have heavy uploads (dropbox/hubic/googledrive/icloud/smtp/sftp/etc.) the downloads are just about non-existent.



      For the initial issue, I'll just need to throttle/QoS any big non-ACK packets, that goes out over the HE & the PPP1 interfaces, but I haven't yet see how to "merge" the traffic from the HE interface into the bandwidth of the PPP1 interface.



      Should I perhaps setup an extra routing "hop"/link/table to have a single throttling interface for the Linux gateway? A minimum VM to do the routing/tunnels over Eth2, and the gateway to then do shaping/etc. on the link between VM & host?






      linux networking tc traffic-shaping




      linux networking tc traffic-shaping






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Oct 2 '17 at 6:51

























      asked Oct 2 '17 at 6:24









      Hvisage

      1719




      1719

























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer







          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "106"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f395572%2fmultiple-interfaces-pppoe-tunnel-traffic-shaped-over-single-adsl%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






















          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f395572%2fmultiple-interfaces-pppoe-tunnel-traffic-shaped-over-single-adsl%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest
































































          -

          Popular posts from this blog

          How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

          Image
          Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this question asked Sep 26 at 0:12 ToanLuong 49 9 add a comment  |  up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this questi...
          Read more

          Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

          Image
          Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP 1 How can I extract a single band from multi-band raster in QGIS? I have an remote sensed image which has 6 bands (including NDVI band), I want to display each band separately, but have no idea how to do. I have seen some questions similar here but none worked for me. The original image (has 6 bands) is: I want to display the band 6 which should be like this: But I tried gdal_translate, and couldn't get the correct result. What I have got is: qgis raster multi-band share | improve this question edited Mar 5 at 0:53 Summer asked Mar 4 at 6:42 Summer Summer 23 6 Is this any help gis.stackexchange.com/questions/220658/… ? if not gis.stackexchange.com/questions/62133/… might help. – Michael Stimson Mar 4 at 6:46 Thanks for answering but when I used gdal_translate, qgis showed that 'Error 4: Kayena.tif: No such file or directory". Would you know how to fi...
          Read more

          How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?

          Image
          Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 2 down vote favorite I am currently learning reverse engineering and am studying the flags register. I had in my mind that rflags was just another name for one of the 16 general purpose registers, for example rax or rbx . But it looks like rflags is actually an additional register. So that makes 17 registers in total... how many more could there be? I have spent at least an hour on this and found numerous different answers. The best answer so far is this, which says that there are 40 registers in total. 16 General Purpose Registers 2 Status Registers 6 Code Segment Registers 16 SSE Registers 8 FPU/MMX Registers But if I add that up, I get 48. Could anybody provide an official answer on how many registers an x86_64 CPU has (e.g. an Intel i7). Additionally, I have seen references to 'hardware' and 'architectural' registers. What are those registers and how many are there? register x86-64 share | improve this...
          Read more