Is it possible to use Arch without installing the base package?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












Is it possible to use Arch without installing the base package? 
If not, why is the base package not part of the installation image?










share|improve this question























  • Yes, it is possible. (for example: with busybox) And because it's huge.
    – Ipor Sircer
    Sep 11 at 3:04











  • Can i manually install the base packages i want? Because a lot of them i dont need
    – Eugenio Ullauri
    Sep 11 at 3:06










  • Yes, of course. Arch is about freedom. Do what you want. Base is a collection of often used programs for beginners. If you know what do you need and what not, you can picking them.
    – Ipor Sircer
    Sep 11 at 3:07















up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












Is it possible to use Arch without installing the base package? 
If not, why is the base package not part of the installation image?










share|improve this question























  • Yes, it is possible. (for example: with busybox) And because it's huge.
    – Ipor Sircer
    Sep 11 at 3:04











  • Can i manually install the base packages i want? Because a lot of them i dont need
    – Eugenio Ullauri
    Sep 11 at 3:06










  • Yes, of course. Arch is about freedom. Do what you want. Base is a collection of often used programs for beginners. If you know what do you need and what not, you can picking them.
    – Ipor Sircer
    Sep 11 at 3:07













up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1






1





Is it possible to use Arch without installing the base package? 
If not, why is the base package not part of the installation image?










share|improve this question















Is it possible to use Arch without installing the base package? 
If not, why is the base package not part of the installation image?







linux arch-linux linux-kernel






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Sep 11 at 2:57









G-Man

11.8k92658




11.8k92658










asked Sep 11 at 2:53









Eugenio Ullauri

132




132











  • Yes, it is possible. (for example: with busybox) And because it's huge.
    – Ipor Sircer
    Sep 11 at 3:04











  • Can i manually install the base packages i want? Because a lot of them i dont need
    – Eugenio Ullauri
    Sep 11 at 3:06










  • Yes, of course. Arch is about freedom. Do what you want. Base is a collection of often used programs for beginners. If you know what do you need and what not, you can picking them.
    – Ipor Sircer
    Sep 11 at 3:07

















  • Yes, it is possible. (for example: with busybox) And because it's huge.
    – Ipor Sircer
    Sep 11 at 3:04











  • Can i manually install the base packages i want? Because a lot of them i dont need
    – Eugenio Ullauri
    Sep 11 at 3:06










  • Yes, of course. Arch is about freedom. Do what you want. Base is a collection of often used programs for beginners. If you know what do you need and what not, you can picking them.
    – Ipor Sircer
    Sep 11 at 3:07
















Yes, it is possible. (for example: with busybox) And because it's huge.
– Ipor Sircer
Sep 11 at 3:04





Yes, it is possible. (for example: with busybox) And because it's huge.
– Ipor Sircer
Sep 11 at 3:04













Can i manually install the base packages i want? Because a lot of them i dont need
– Eugenio Ullauri
Sep 11 at 3:06




Can i manually install the base packages i want? Because a lot of them i dont need
– Eugenio Ullauri
Sep 11 at 3:06












Yes, of course. Arch is about freedom. Do what you want. Base is a collection of often used programs for beginners. If you know what do you need and what not, you can picking them.
– Ipor Sircer
Sep 11 at 3:07





Yes, of course. Arch is about freedom. Do what you want. Base is a collection of often used programs for beginners. If you know what do you need and what not, you can picking them.
– Ipor Sircer
Sep 11 at 3:07











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote













No, you cannot install Arch without the base group.1



The base group comprises packages critical for the system. It must be installed in order for you to have a running system.



You can, however, elect to remove some of the individual packages from the group if you are certain that you will not need them. For example, mdadm if you don't require RAID functionality. Obviously, you would want to be certain that these packages are not depends of other critical packages before removing them.



1. If you are trying to build a minimal environment, then you can choose to forego installing the entire base group, as long as you feed pacstrap a complete list of the requisite packages sufficient to create a bootable image.






share|improve this answer




















  • Why the must packages are not included by default?
    – Eugenio Ullauri
    Sep 11 at 3:23










  • They are included by default: they are even bundled as a group for convenience.
    – jasonwryan
    Sep 11 at 3:26










  • I mean they are not in the iso image you download from the arch site, that is why the installation guide says to intall the base stuff
    – Eugenio Ullauri
    Sep 11 at 3:28






  • 4




    Well, technically, most of them are in the ISO (you wouldn't be able to boot it otherwise). You donwload them because Arch is a rolling release and you always want the newest packages.
    – jasonwryan
    Sep 11 at 3:30

















up vote
0
down vote













base is not a package its a group of packages so the issue is with the individual packages. They are included in the package group either because they are needed to boot or are important to administration.



The iso is a pre-install environment and is intended to provide a system that can install Arch Linux. It could contain packages via cache but most of the time it contains no packages.



Aside from files you create and a few directories created by pacstrap the entire system is installed via packages that are downloaded by pacman. The directories pacman creates are just for mountpoints and pacman cache.






share|improve this answer




















    Your Answer







    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "106"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f468152%2fis-it-possible-to-use-arch-without-installing-the-base-package%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    2
    down vote













    No, you cannot install Arch without the base group.1



    The base group comprises packages critical for the system. It must be installed in order for you to have a running system.



    You can, however, elect to remove some of the individual packages from the group if you are certain that you will not need them. For example, mdadm if you don't require RAID functionality. Obviously, you would want to be certain that these packages are not depends of other critical packages before removing them.



    1. If you are trying to build a minimal environment, then you can choose to forego installing the entire base group, as long as you feed pacstrap a complete list of the requisite packages sufficient to create a bootable image.






    share|improve this answer




















    • Why the must packages are not included by default?
      – Eugenio Ullauri
      Sep 11 at 3:23










    • They are included by default: they are even bundled as a group for convenience.
      – jasonwryan
      Sep 11 at 3:26










    • I mean they are not in the iso image you download from the arch site, that is why the installation guide says to intall the base stuff
      – Eugenio Ullauri
      Sep 11 at 3:28






    • 4




      Well, technically, most of them are in the ISO (you wouldn't be able to boot it otherwise). You donwload them because Arch is a rolling release and you always want the newest packages.
      – jasonwryan
      Sep 11 at 3:30














    up vote
    2
    down vote













    No, you cannot install Arch without the base group.1



    The base group comprises packages critical for the system. It must be installed in order for you to have a running system.



    You can, however, elect to remove some of the individual packages from the group if you are certain that you will not need them. For example, mdadm if you don't require RAID functionality. Obviously, you would want to be certain that these packages are not depends of other critical packages before removing them.



    1. If you are trying to build a minimal environment, then you can choose to forego installing the entire base group, as long as you feed pacstrap a complete list of the requisite packages sufficient to create a bootable image.






    share|improve this answer




















    • Why the must packages are not included by default?
      – Eugenio Ullauri
      Sep 11 at 3:23










    • They are included by default: they are even bundled as a group for convenience.
      – jasonwryan
      Sep 11 at 3:26










    • I mean they are not in the iso image you download from the arch site, that is why the installation guide says to intall the base stuff
      – Eugenio Ullauri
      Sep 11 at 3:28






    • 4




      Well, technically, most of them are in the ISO (you wouldn't be able to boot it otherwise). You donwload them because Arch is a rolling release and you always want the newest packages.
      – jasonwryan
      Sep 11 at 3:30












    up vote
    2
    down vote










    up vote
    2
    down vote









    No, you cannot install Arch without the base group.1



    The base group comprises packages critical for the system. It must be installed in order for you to have a running system.



    You can, however, elect to remove some of the individual packages from the group if you are certain that you will not need them. For example, mdadm if you don't require RAID functionality. Obviously, you would want to be certain that these packages are not depends of other critical packages before removing them.



    1. If you are trying to build a minimal environment, then you can choose to forego installing the entire base group, as long as you feed pacstrap a complete list of the requisite packages sufficient to create a bootable image.






    share|improve this answer












    No, you cannot install Arch without the base group.1



    The base group comprises packages critical for the system. It must be installed in order for you to have a running system.



    You can, however, elect to remove some of the individual packages from the group if you are certain that you will not need them. For example, mdadm if you don't require RAID functionality. Obviously, you would want to be certain that these packages are not depends of other critical packages before removing them.



    1. If you are trying to build a minimal environment, then you can choose to forego installing the entire base group, as long as you feed pacstrap a complete list of the requisite packages sufficient to create a bootable image.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Sep 11 at 3:20









    jasonwryan

    47.5k14130179




    47.5k14130179











    • Why the must packages are not included by default?
      – Eugenio Ullauri
      Sep 11 at 3:23










    • They are included by default: they are even bundled as a group for convenience.
      – jasonwryan
      Sep 11 at 3:26










    • I mean they are not in the iso image you download from the arch site, that is why the installation guide says to intall the base stuff
      – Eugenio Ullauri
      Sep 11 at 3:28






    • 4




      Well, technically, most of them are in the ISO (you wouldn't be able to boot it otherwise). You donwload them because Arch is a rolling release and you always want the newest packages.
      – jasonwryan
      Sep 11 at 3:30
















    • Why the must packages are not included by default?
      – Eugenio Ullauri
      Sep 11 at 3:23










    • They are included by default: they are even bundled as a group for convenience.
      – jasonwryan
      Sep 11 at 3:26










    • I mean they are not in the iso image you download from the arch site, that is why the installation guide says to intall the base stuff
      – Eugenio Ullauri
      Sep 11 at 3:28






    • 4




      Well, technically, most of them are in the ISO (you wouldn't be able to boot it otherwise). You donwload them because Arch is a rolling release and you always want the newest packages.
      – jasonwryan
      Sep 11 at 3:30















    Why the must packages are not included by default?
    – Eugenio Ullauri
    Sep 11 at 3:23




    Why the must packages are not included by default?
    – Eugenio Ullauri
    Sep 11 at 3:23












    They are included by default: they are even bundled as a group for convenience.
    – jasonwryan
    Sep 11 at 3:26




    They are included by default: they are even bundled as a group for convenience.
    – jasonwryan
    Sep 11 at 3:26












    I mean they are not in the iso image you download from the arch site, that is why the installation guide says to intall the base stuff
    – Eugenio Ullauri
    Sep 11 at 3:28




    I mean they are not in the iso image you download from the arch site, that is why the installation guide says to intall the base stuff
    – Eugenio Ullauri
    Sep 11 at 3:28




    4




    4




    Well, technically, most of them are in the ISO (you wouldn't be able to boot it otherwise). You donwload them because Arch is a rolling release and you always want the newest packages.
    – jasonwryan
    Sep 11 at 3:30




    Well, technically, most of them are in the ISO (you wouldn't be able to boot it otherwise). You donwload them because Arch is a rolling release and you always want the newest packages.
    – jasonwryan
    Sep 11 at 3:30












    up vote
    0
    down vote













    base is not a package its a group of packages so the issue is with the individual packages. They are included in the package group either because they are needed to boot or are important to administration.



    The iso is a pre-install environment and is intended to provide a system that can install Arch Linux. It could contain packages via cache but most of the time it contains no packages.



    Aside from files you create and a few directories created by pacstrap the entire system is installed via packages that are downloaded by pacman. The directories pacman creates are just for mountpoints and pacman cache.






    share|improve this answer
























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      base is not a package its a group of packages so the issue is with the individual packages. They are included in the package group either because they are needed to boot or are important to administration.



      The iso is a pre-install environment and is intended to provide a system that can install Arch Linux. It could contain packages via cache but most of the time it contains no packages.



      Aside from files you create and a few directories created by pacstrap the entire system is installed via packages that are downloaded by pacman. The directories pacman creates are just for mountpoints and pacman cache.






      share|improve this answer






















        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        base is not a package its a group of packages so the issue is with the individual packages. They are included in the package group either because they are needed to boot or are important to administration.



        The iso is a pre-install environment and is intended to provide a system that can install Arch Linux. It could contain packages via cache but most of the time it contains no packages.



        Aside from files you create and a few directories created by pacstrap the entire system is installed via packages that are downloaded by pacman. The directories pacman creates are just for mountpoints and pacman cache.






        share|improve this answer












        base is not a package its a group of packages so the issue is with the individual packages. They are included in the package group either because they are needed to boot or are important to administration.



        The iso is a pre-install environment and is intended to provide a system that can install Arch Linux. It could contain packages via cache but most of the time it contains no packages.



        Aside from files you create and a few directories created by pacstrap the entire system is installed via packages that are downloaded by pacman. The directories pacman creates are just for mountpoints and pacman cache.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 2 days ago









        jdwolf

        2,427116




        2,427116



























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f468152%2fis-it-possible-to-use-arch-without-installing-the-base-package%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            Popular posts from this blog

            How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

            Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

            How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?