Extra space with counted line number?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
3
down vote

favorite












I count the number of lines of my file with this command on OSX:



nl=$(wc -l < ~/myfile.txt)


Say, nl turns out to be 100. Now, I wish to use the result nl in another command, but weirdly,



echo 1-$nl


gives me 1- 100 instead of 1-100.



Demo



cv me$ nl=$(wc -l < ~/Desktop/cap.xlsx)
cv me$ echo $nl
104
cv me$ echo 1-$nl
1- 104


enter image description here



enter image description here



Why does this happen? How may I get 1-100?










share|improve this question























  • What OS are you on? I can't reproduce this on my Debian.
    – terdon♦
    May 27 '15 at 15:47










  • @terdon I am on OS X. Please see the updates.
    – Sibbs Gambling
    May 27 '15 at 15:49






  • 1




    Weird. Make few tests to narrow the problem: 1) set value directly nl=100; 2) try different delimiter, not -; 3) put double quotes around expression echo "1-$nl"; 4) use printf instead of echo
    – jimmij
    May 27 '15 at 16:03










  • @Sibbs; I either cannot reproduce it. What output do you get when quoting echo $nl as echo "$nl".
    – Janis
    May 27 '15 at 16:03










  • @Janis I can't format that properly here. Please see the screenshot above.
    – Sibbs Gambling
    May 27 '15 at 16:12















up vote
3
down vote

favorite












I count the number of lines of my file with this command on OSX:



nl=$(wc -l < ~/myfile.txt)


Say, nl turns out to be 100. Now, I wish to use the result nl in another command, but weirdly,



echo 1-$nl


gives me 1- 100 instead of 1-100.



Demo



cv me$ nl=$(wc -l < ~/Desktop/cap.xlsx)
cv me$ echo $nl
104
cv me$ echo 1-$nl
1- 104


enter image description here



enter image description here



Why does this happen? How may I get 1-100?










share|improve this question























  • What OS are you on? I can't reproduce this on my Debian.
    – terdon♦
    May 27 '15 at 15:47










  • @terdon I am on OS X. Please see the updates.
    – Sibbs Gambling
    May 27 '15 at 15:49






  • 1




    Weird. Make few tests to narrow the problem: 1) set value directly nl=100; 2) try different delimiter, not -; 3) put double quotes around expression echo "1-$nl"; 4) use printf instead of echo
    – jimmij
    May 27 '15 at 16:03










  • @Sibbs; I either cannot reproduce it. What output do you get when quoting echo $nl as echo "$nl".
    – Janis
    May 27 '15 at 16:03










  • @Janis I can't format that properly here. Please see the screenshot above.
    – Sibbs Gambling
    May 27 '15 at 16:12













up vote
3
down vote

favorite









up vote
3
down vote

favorite











I count the number of lines of my file with this command on OSX:



nl=$(wc -l < ~/myfile.txt)


Say, nl turns out to be 100. Now, I wish to use the result nl in another command, but weirdly,



echo 1-$nl


gives me 1- 100 instead of 1-100.



Demo



cv me$ nl=$(wc -l < ~/Desktop/cap.xlsx)
cv me$ echo $nl
104
cv me$ echo 1-$nl
1- 104


enter image description here



enter image description here



Why does this happen? How may I get 1-100?










share|improve this question















I count the number of lines of my file with this command on OSX:



nl=$(wc -l < ~/myfile.txt)


Say, nl turns out to be 100. Now, I wish to use the result nl in another command, but weirdly,



echo 1-$nl


gives me 1- 100 instead of 1-100.



Demo



cv me$ nl=$(wc -l < ~/Desktop/cap.xlsx)
cv me$ echo $nl
104
cv me$ echo 1-$nl
1- 104


enter image description here



enter image description here



Why does this happen? How may I get 1-100?







shell string wc






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited May 27 '15 at 22:50









Gilles

511k12010141543




511k12010141543










asked May 27 '15 at 15:45









Sibbs Gambling

5202919




5202919











  • What OS are you on? I can't reproduce this on my Debian.
    – terdon♦
    May 27 '15 at 15:47










  • @terdon I am on OS X. Please see the updates.
    – Sibbs Gambling
    May 27 '15 at 15:49






  • 1




    Weird. Make few tests to narrow the problem: 1) set value directly nl=100; 2) try different delimiter, not -; 3) put double quotes around expression echo "1-$nl"; 4) use printf instead of echo
    – jimmij
    May 27 '15 at 16:03










  • @Sibbs; I either cannot reproduce it. What output do you get when quoting echo $nl as echo "$nl".
    – Janis
    May 27 '15 at 16:03










  • @Janis I can't format that properly here. Please see the screenshot above.
    – Sibbs Gambling
    May 27 '15 at 16:12

















  • What OS are you on? I can't reproduce this on my Debian.
    – terdon♦
    May 27 '15 at 15:47










  • @terdon I am on OS X. Please see the updates.
    – Sibbs Gambling
    May 27 '15 at 15:49






  • 1




    Weird. Make few tests to narrow the problem: 1) set value directly nl=100; 2) try different delimiter, not -; 3) put double quotes around expression echo "1-$nl"; 4) use printf instead of echo
    – jimmij
    May 27 '15 at 16:03










  • @Sibbs; I either cannot reproduce it. What output do you get when quoting echo $nl as echo "$nl".
    – Janis
    May 27 '15 at 16:03










  • @Janis I can't format that properly here. Please see the screenshot above.
    – Sibbs Gambling
    May 27 '15 at 16:12
















What OS are you on? I can't reproduce this on my Debian.
– terdon♦
May 27 '15 at 15:47




What OS are you on? I can't reproduce this on my Debian.
– terdon♦
May 27 '15 at 15:47












@terdon I am on OS X. Please see the updates.
– Sibbs Gambling
May 27 '15 at 15:49




@terdon I am on OS X. Please see the updates.
– Sibbs Gambling
May 27 '15 at 15:49




1




1




Weird. Make few tests to narrow the problem: 1) set value directly nl=100; 2) try different delimiter, not -; 3) put double quotes around expression echo "1-$nl"; 4) use printf instead of echo
– jimmij
May 27 '15 at 16:03




Weird. Make few tests to narrow the problem: 1) set value directly nl=100; 2) try different delimiter, not -; 3) put double quotes around expression echo "1-$nl"; 4) use printf instead of echo
– jimmij
May 27 '15 at 16:03












@Sibbs; I either cannot reproduce it. What output do you get when quoting echo $nl as echo "$nl".
– Janis
May 27 '15 at 16:03




@Sibbs; I either cannot reproduce it. What output do you get when quoting echo $nl as echo "$nl".
– Janis
May 27 '15 at 16:03












@Janis I can't format that properly here. Please see the screenshot above.
– Sibbs Gambling
May 27 '15 at 16:12





@Janis I can't format that properly here. Please see the screenshot above.
– Sibbs Gambling
May 27 '15 at 16:12











4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
4
down vote













As POSIX defined, the output of wc shall contain an entry for each input file of the form:



"%d %d %d %sn", <newlines>, <words>, <bytes>, <file>


But the output file format pseudo printf() string differs from the System V version of wc:



"%7d%7d%7d %sn"


POSIX didn't require leading spaces to be added, so it's free for implementation to do what it want. There are different implementations of wc, at least with OSX and wc from heirloom tools chest, it added leading spaces to output.



$ /usr/5bin/wc -l /tmp/file
3 /tmp/file


GNU wc also add leading spaces when reading from standard in and without any options:



$ cat file | wc
5 5 65


To remove all leading spaces, in POSIX shell:



set -f
set -- $nl
nl=$1
set +f


Note that this approach assume that variable only contain leading or trailing spaces, no spaces in the middle, like a b.






share|improve this answer





























    up vote
    4
    down vote













    wc implementations may produce leading spaces; this may also be depending on whether (and how many) options are used (GNU wc, for example, won't produce spaces if, as in your case, exactly one option is used). Those spaces are retained in the assignment nl=$(...). To remove the spaces, as a workaround, you could use either of:



    nl=$(wc -l < ~/myfile.txt | awk 'print $1')


    or



    nl=$(awk 'ENDprint NR' ~/myfile.txt)


    or



    nl=$(wc -l < ~/Desktop/cap.xlsx)
    nl=$(echo $nl)


    or (but see @cuonglm's comment below for heirloom's version of wc)



    nl=$(wc -l < ~/Desktop/cap.xlsx)
    nl=$nl##*





    share|improve this answer






















    • @cuonglm; Thanks for spotting that; I changed the shell regexp now from nl=$nl## * to nl=$nl##* .
      – Janis
      May 27 '15 at 16:40











    • It still fail with heirloom wc, it produce trailing spaces, too. So you still remove the entire variable.
      – cuonglm
      May 27 '15 at 16:42










    • The heirloom wc produces trailing spaces? - Okay. I'll leave that variant still as one option. With your comment here the folks now know that in heirloom context they should apply one of the other suggestions.
      – Janis
      May 27 '15 at 16:46

















    up vote
    1
    down vote













    Simpliest workaround (in bash or any other POSIX shell):



    nl=$(wc -l < ~/myfile.txt)
    nl=$(($nl))


    $((...)) in standard sh is for arithmetic expansion, so the result will always be only the number itself. Note that if wc -l produces no output (like when the file can't be read), that will yield 0 instead of an empty string.



    $((nl)) would also work in bash but is not guaranteed to by POSIX as $nl doesn't contain a numerical constant, and in practice doesn't work in yash for instance.



    You can also do it all at once with:



    nl=$(($(wc -l < ~/myfile.txt)))


    Which has the benefit of preserving the exit status of wc.






    share|improve this answer





























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      As an alternative without the problem of spaces (POSIX):



      $ sed -n '$=' ~/myfile.txt


      Captured in a variable:



      $ nl=$(sed -n '$=' ~/myfile.txt)
      $ echo "1-$nl-"
      1-100-


      Note that sed counts the last line even if it doesn't end in a newline character (as it should in a properly formatted text file). More generally, sed may fail to print the number of newline characters in non-text files.




      Another alternative:



      $ nl=$(grep -v . ~/myfile.txt | tr 'n' 'x')
      $ echo "1-$#nl"
      1-100


      Note that grep will also print invalid characters (additionally to newlines) in the locale used.






      share|improve this answer






















      • @StéphaneChazelas Why is sed counts the last line even if it doesn't end in a newline character not enough for you? (hmmm, for reasonably clean text files)
        – Isaac
        Sep 11 at 7:33










      • Sorry, I had overlooked that part.
        – Stéphane Chazelas
        Sep 11 at 8:12










      Your Answer







      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "106"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: false,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













       

      draft saved


      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f205906%2fextra-space-with-counted-line-number%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest






























      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes








      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      4
      down vote













      As POSIX defined, the output of wc shall contain an entry for each input file of the form:



      "%d %d %d %sn", <newlines>, <words>, <bytes>, <file>


      But the output file format pseudo printf() string differs from the System V version of wc:



      "%7d%7d%7d %sn"


      POSIX didn't require leading spaces to be added, so it's free for implementation to do what it want. There are different implementations of wc, at least with OSX and wc from heirloom tools chest, it added leading spaces to output.



      $ /usr/5bin/wc -l /tmp/file
      3 /tmp/file


      GNU wc also add leading spaces when reading from standard in and without any options:



      $ cat file | wc
      5 5 65


      To remove all leading spaces, in POSIX shell:



      set -f
      set -- $nl
      nl=$1
      set +f


      Note that this approach assume that variable only contain leading or trailing spaces, no spaces in the middle, like a b.






      share|improve this answer


























        up vote
        4
        down vote













        As POSIX defined, the output of wc shall contain an entry for each input file of the form:



        "%d %d %d %sn", <newlines>, <words>, <bytes>, <file>


        But the output file format pseudo printf() string differs from the System V version of wc:



        "%7d%7d%7d %sn"


        POSIX didn't require leading spaces to be added, so it's free for implementation to do what it want. There are different implementations of wc, at least with OSX and wc from heirloom tools chest, it added leading spaces to output.



        $ /usr/5bin/wc -l /tmp/file
        3 /tmp/file


        GNU wc also add leading spaces when reading from standard in and without any options:



        $ cat file | wc
        5 5 65


        To remove all leading spaces, in POSIX shell:



        set -f
        set -- $nl
        nl=$1
        set +f


        Note that this approach assume that variable only contain leading or trailing spaces, no spaces in the middle, like a b.






        share|improve this answer
























          up vote
          4
          down vote










          up vote
          4
          down vote









          As POSIX defined, the output of wc shall contain an entry for each input file of the form:



          "%d %d %d %sn", <newlines>, <words>, <bytes>, <file>


          But the output file format pseudo printf() string differs from the System V version of wc:



          "%7d%7d%7d %sn"


          POSIX didn't require leading spaces to be added, so it's free for implementation to do what it want. There are different implementations of wc, at least with OSX and wc from heirloom tools chest, it added leading spaces to output.



          $ /usr/5bin/wc -l /tmp/file
          3 /tmp/file


          GNU wc also add leading spaces when reading from standard in and without any options:



          $ cat file | wc
          5 5 65


          To remove all leading spaces, in POSIX shell:



          set -f
          set -- $nl
          nl=$1
          set +f


          Note that this approach assume that variable only contain leading or trailing spaces, no spaces in the middle, like a b.






          share|improve this answer














          As POSIX defined, the output of wc shall contain an entry for each input file of the form:



          "%d %d %d %sn", <newlines>, <words>, <bytes>, <file>


          But the output file format pseudo printf() string differs from the System V version of wc:



          "%7d%7d%7d %sn"


          POSIX didn't require leading spaces to be added, so it's free for implementation to do what it want. There are different implementations of wc, at least with OSX and wc from heirloom tools chest, it added leading spaces to output.



          $ /usr/5bin/wc -l /tmp/file
          3 /tmp/file


          GNU wc also add leading spaces when reading from standard in and without any options:



          $ cat file | wc
          5 5 65


          To remove all leading spaces, in POSIX shell:



          set -f
          set -- $nl
          nl=$1
          set +f


          Note that this approach assume that variable only contain leading or trailing spaces, no spaces in the middle, like a b.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited May 27 '15 at 16:45

























          answered May 27 '15 at 16:11









          cuonglm

          98.6k21188285




          98.6k21188285






















              up vote
              4
              down vote













              wc implementations may produce leading spaces; this may also be depending on whether (and how many) options are used (GNU wc, for example, won't produce spaces if, as in your case, exactly one option is used). Those spaces are retained in the assignment nl=$(...). To remove the spaces, as a workaround, you could use either of:



              nl=$(wc -l < ~/myfile.txt | awk 'print $1')


              or



              nl=$(awk 'ENDprint NR' ~/myfile.txt)


              or



              nl=$(wc -l < ~/Desktop/cap.xlsx)
              nl=$(echo $nl)


              or (but see @cuonglm's comment below for heirloom's version of wc)



              nl=$(wc -l < ~/Desktop/cap.xlsx)
              nl=$nl##*





              share|improve this answer






















              • @cuonglm; Thanks for spotting that; I changed the shell regexp now from nl=$nl## * to nl=$nl##* .
                – Janis
                May 27 '15 at 16:40











              • It still fail with heirloom wc, it produce trailing spaces, too. So you still remove the entire variable.
                – cuonglm
                May 27 '15 at 16:42










              • The heirloom wc produces trailing spaces? - Okay. I'll leave that variant still as one option. With your comment here the folks now know that in heirloom context they should apply one of the other suggestions.
                – Janis
                May 27 '15 at 16:46














              up vote
              4
              down vote













              wc implementations may produce leading spaces; this may also be depending on whether (and how many) options are used (GNU wc, for example, won't produce spaces if, as in your case, exactly one option is used). Those spaces are retained in the assignment nl=$(...). To remove the spaces, as a workaround, you could use either of:



              nl=$(wc -l < ~/myfile.txt | awk 'print $1')


              or



              nl=$(awk 'ENDprint NR' ~/myfile.txt)


              or



              nl=$(wc -l < ~/Desktop/cap.xlsx)
              nl=$(echo $nl)


              or (but see @cuonglm's comment below for heirloom's version of wc)



              nl=$(wc -l < ~/Desktop/cap.xlsx)
              nl=$nl##*





              share|improve this answer






















              • @cuonglm; Thanks for spotting that; I changed the shell regexp now from nl=$nl## * to nl=$nl##* .
                – Janis
                May 27 '15 at 16:40











              • It still fail with heirloom wc, it produce trailing spaces, too. So you still remove the entire variable.
                – cuonglm
                May 27 '15 at 16:42










              • The heirloom wc produces trailing spaces? - Okay. I'll leave that variant still as one option. With your comment here the folks now know that in heirloom context they should apply one of the other suggestions.
                – Janis
                May 27 '15 at 16:46












              up vote
              4
              down vote










              up vote
              4
              down vote









              wc implementations may produce leading spaces; this may also be depending on whether (and how many) options are used (GNU wc, for example, won't produce spaces if, as in your case, exactly one option is used). Those spaces are retained in the assignment nl=$(...). To remove the spaces, as a workaround, you could use either of:



              nl=$(wc -l < ~/myfile.txt | awk 'print $1')


              or



              nl=$(awk 'ENDprint NR' ~/myfile.txt)


              or



              nl=$(wc -l < ~/Desktop/cap.xlsx)
              nl=$(echo $nl)


              or (but see @cuonglm's comment below for heirloom's version of wc)



              nl=$(wc -l < ~/Desktop/cap.xlsx)
              nl=$nl##*





              share|improve this answer














              wc implementations may produce leading spaces; this may also be depending on whether (and how many) options are used (GNU wc, for example, won't produce spaces if, as in your case, exactly one option is used). Those spaces are retained in the assignment nl=$(...). To remove the spaces, as a workaround, you could use either of:



              nl=$(wc -l < ~/myfile.txt | awk 'print $1')


              or



              nl=$(awk 'ENDprint NR' ~/myfile.txt)


              or



              nl=$(wc -l < ~/Desktop/cap.xlsx)
              nl=$(echo $nl)


              or (but see @cuonglm's comment below for heirloom's version of wc)



              nl=$(wc -l < ~/Desktop/cap.xlsx)
              nl=$nl##*






              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited May 27 '15 at 16:54

























              answered May 27 '15 at 16:05









              Janis

              9,79011236




              9,79011236











              • @cuonglm; Thanks for spotting that; I changed the shell regexp now from nl=$nl## * to nl=$nl##* .
                – Janis
                May 27 '15 at 16:40











              • It still fail with heirloom wc, it produce trailing spaces, too. So you still remove the entire variable.
                – cuonglm
                May 27 '15 at 16:42










              • The heirloom wc produces trailing spaces? - Okay. I'll leave that variant still as one option. With your comment here the folks now know that in heirloom context they should apply one of the other suggestions.
                – Janis
                May 27 '15 at 16:46
















              • @cuonglm; Thanks for spotting that; I changed the shell regexp now from nl=$nl## * to nl=$nl##* .
                – Janis
                May 27 '15 at 16:40











              • It still fail with heirloom wc, it produce trailing spaces, too. So you still remove the entire variable.
                – cuonglm
                May 27 '15 at 16:42










              • The heirloom wc produces trailing spaces? - Okay. I'll leave that variant still as one option. With your comment here the folks now know that in heirloom context they should apply one of the other suggestions.
                – Janis
                May 27 '15 at 16:46















              @cuonglm; Thanks for spotting that; I changed the shell regexp now from nl=$nl## * to nl=$nl##* .
              – Janis
              May 27 '15 at 16:40





              @cuonglm; Thanks for spotting that; I changed the shell regexp now from nl=$nl## * to nl=$nl##* .
              – Janis
              May 27 '15 at 16:40













              It still fail with heirloom wc, it produce trailing spaces, too. So you still remove the entire variable.
              – cuonglm
              May 27 '15 at 16:42




              It still fail with heirloom wc, it produce trailing spaces, too. So you still remove the entire variable.
              – cuonglm
              May 27 '15 at 16:42












              The heirloom wc produces trailing spaces? - Okay. I'll leave that variant still as one option. With your comment here the folks now know that in heirloom context they should apply one of the other suggestions.
              – Janis
              May 27 '15 at 16:46




              The heirloom wc produces trailing spaces? - Okay. I'll leave that variant still as one option. With your comment here the folks now know that in heirloom context they should apply one of the other suggestions.
              – Janis
              May 27 '15 at 16:46










              up vote
              1
              down vote













              Simpliest workaround (in bash or any other POSIX shell):



              nl=$(wc -l < ~/myfile.txt)
              nl=$(($nl))


              $((...)) in standard sh is for arithmetic expansion, so the result will always be only the number itself. Note that if wc -l produces no output (like when the file can't be read), that will yield 0 instead of an empty string.



              $((nl)) would also work in bash but is not guaranteed to by POSIX as $nl doesn't contain a numerical constant, and in practice doesn't work in yash for instance.



              You can also do it all at once with:



              nl=$(($(wc -l < ~/myfile.txt)))


              Which has the benefit of preserving the exit status of wc.






              share|improve this answer


























                up vote
                1
                down vote













                Simpliest workaround (in bash or any other POSIX shell):



                nl=$(wc -l < ~/myfile.txt)
                nl=$(($nl))


                $((...)) in standard sh is for arithmetic expansion, so the result will always be only the number itself. Note that if wc -l produces no output (like when the file can't be read), that will yield 0 instead of an empty string.



                $((nl)) would also work in bash but is not guaranteed to by POSIX as $nl doesn't contain a numerical constant, and in practice doesn't work in yash for instance.



                You can also do it all at once with:



                nl=$(($(wc -l < ~/myfile.txt)))


                Which has the benefit of preserving the exit status of wc.






                share|improve this answer
























                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote









                  Simpliest workaround (in bash or any other POSIX shell):



                  nl=$(wc -l < ~/myfile.txt)
                  nl=$(($nl))


                  $((...)) in standard sh is for arithmetic expansion, so the result will always be only the number itself. Note that if wc -l produces no output (like when the file can't be read), that will yield 0 instead of an empty string.



                  $((nl)) would also work in bash but is not guaranteed to by POSIX as $nl doesn't contain a numerical constant, and in practice doesn't work in yash for instance.



                  You can also do it all at once with:



                  nl=$(($(wc -l < ~/myfile.txt)))


                  Which has the benefit of preserving the exit status of wc.






                  share|improve this answer














                  Simpliest workaround (in bash or any other POSIX shell):



                  nl=$(wc -l < ~/myfile.txt)
                  nl=$(($nl))


                  $((...)) in standard sh is for arithmetic expansion, so the result will always be only the number itself. Note that if wc -l produces no output (like when the file can't be read), that will yield 0 instead of an empty string.



                  $((nl)) would also work in bash but is not guaranteed to by POSIX as $nl doesn't contain a numerical constant, and in practice doesn't work in yash for instance.



                  You can also do it all at once with:



                  nl=$(($(wc -l < ~/myfile.txt)))


                  Which has the benefit of preserving the exit status of wc.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited Sep 10 at 13:02









                  Stéphane Chazelas

                  286k53528867




                  286k53528867










                  answered Sep 9 at 16:14









                  Clément Moulin - SimpleRezo

                  91




                  91




















                      up vote
                      1
                      down vote













                      As an alternative without the problem of spaces (POSIX):



                      $ sed -n '$=' ~/myfile.txt


                      Captured in a variable:



                      $ nl=$(sed -n '$=' ~/myfile.txt)
                      $ echo "1-$nl-"
                      1-100-


                      Note that sed counts the last line even if it doesn't end in a newline character (as it should in a properly formatted text file). More generally, sed may fail to print the number of newline characters in non-text files.




                      Another alternative:



                      $ nl=$(grep -v . ~/myfile.txt | tr 'n' 'x')
                      $ echo "1-$#nl"
                      1-100


                      Note that grep will also print invalid characters (additionally to newlines) in the locale used.






                      share|improve this answer






















                      • @StéphaneChazelas Why is sed counts the last line even if it doesn't end in a newline character not enough for you? (hmmm, for reasonably clean text files)
                        – Isaac
                        Sep 11 at 7:33










                      • Sorry, I had overlooked that part.
                        – Stéphane Chazelas
                        Sep 11 at 8:12














                      up vote
                      1
                      down vote













                      As an alternative without the problem of spaces (POSIX):



                      $ sed -n '$=' ~/myfile.txt


                      Captured in a variable:



                      $ nl=$(sed -n '$=' ~/myfile.txt)
                      $ echo "1-$nl-"
                      1-100-


                      Note that sed counts the last line even if it doesn't end in a newline character (as it should in a properly formatted text file). More generally, sed may fail to print the number of newline characters in non-text files.




                      Another alternative:



                      $ nl=$(grep -v . ~/myfile.txt | tr 'n' 'x')
                      $ echo "1-$#nl"
                      1-100


                      Note that grep will also print invalid characters (additionally to newlines) in the locale used.






                      share|improve this answer






















                      • @StéphaneChazelas Why is sed counts the last line even if it doesn't end in a newline character not enough for you? (hmmm, for reasonably clean text files)
                        – Isaac
                        Sep 11 at 7:33










                      • Sorry, I had overlooked that part.
                        – Stéphane Chazelas
                        Sep 11 at 8:12












                      up vote
                      1
                      down vote










                      up vote
                      1
                      down vote









                      As an alternative without the problem of spaces (POSIX):



                      $ sed -n '$=' ~/myfile.txt


                      Captured in a variable:



                      $ nl=$(sed -n '$=' ~/myfile.txt)
                      $ echo "1-$nl-"
                      1-100-


                      Note that sed counts the last line even if it doesn't end in a newline character (as it should in a properly formatted text file). More generally, sed may fail to print the number of newline characters in non-text files.




                      Another alternative:



                      $ nl=$(grep -v . ~/myfile.txt | tr 'n' 'x')
                      $ echo "1-$#nl"
                      1-100


                      Note that grep will also print invalid characters (additionally to newlines) in the locale used.






                      share|improve this answer














                      As an alternative without the problem of spaces (POSIX):



                      $ sed -n '$=' ~/myfile.txt


                      Captured in a variable:



                      $ nl=$(sed -n '$=' ~/myfile.txt)
                      $ echo "1-$nl-"
                      1-100-


                      Note that sed counts the last line even if it doesn't end in a newline character (as it should in a properly formatted text file). More generally, sed may fail to print the number of newline characters in non-text files.




                      Another alternative:



                      $ nl=$(grep -v . ~/myfile.txt | tr 'n' 'x')
                      $ echo "1-$#nl"
                      1-100


                      Note that grep will also print invalid characters (additionally to newlines) in the locale used.







                      share|improve this answer














                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited Sep 11 at 4:57

























                      answered Sep 10 at 1:52









                      Isaac

                      7,28911035




                      7,28911035











                      • @StéphaneChazelas Why is sed counts the last line even if it doesn't end in a newline character not enough for you? (hmmm, for reasonably clean text files)
                        – Isaac
                        Sep 11 at 7:33










                      • Sorry, I had overlooked that part.
                        – Stéphane Chazelas
                        Sep 11 at 8:12
















                      • @StéphaneChazelas Why is sed counts the last line even if it doesn't end in a newline character not enough for you? (hmmm, for reasonably clean text files)
                        – Isaac
                        Sep 11 at 7:33










                      • Sorry, I had overlooked that part.
                        – Stéphane Chazelas
                        Sep 11 at 8:12















                      @StéphaneChazelas Why is sed counts the last line even if it doesn't end in a newline character not enough for you? (hmmm, for reasonably clean text files)
                      – Isaac
                      Sep 11 at 7:33




                      @StéphaneChazelas Why is sed counts the last line even if it doesn't end in a newline character not enough for you? (hmmm, for reasonably clean text files)
                      – Isaac
                      Sep 11 at 7:33












                      Sorry, I had overlooked that part.
                      – Stéphane Chazelas
                      Sep 11 at 8:12




                      Sorry, I had overlooked that part.
                      – Stéphane Chazelas
                      Sep 11 at 8:12

















                       

                      draft saved


                      draft discarded















































                       


                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f205906%2fextra-space-with-counted-line-number%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest













































































                      Popular posts from this blog

                      How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

                      Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

                      How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?