How to get soft-blur effect on flowing water with iPhone?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
6
down vote

favorite












I like taking pictures of flowing water on my iPhone, and I'd like to get the soft-cloudy-blur effect for the water. On a traditional lens camera, this can be done with a longer exposure time. Is this possible on an iPhone 6s? And can you describe the process?



Something like this:



waterfall koi pond










share|improve this question



















  • 1




    There are a apps designed for this, e.g. itunes.apple.com/us/app/slow-shutter-cam/id357404131?mt=8. A tripod will help a lot too.
    – Tim Hopper
    Sep 11 at 17:20










  • Those who want a native solution that does not require purchasing a third-party app and clip-on ND filter, see BallpointBen's answer.
    – xiota
    Sep 18 at 8:57















up vote
6
down vote

favorite












I like taking pictures of flowing water on my iPhone, and I'd like to get the soft-cloudy-blur effect for the water. On a traditional lens camera, this can be done with a longer exposure time. Is this possible on an iPhone 6s? And can you describe the process?



Something like this:



waterfall koi pond










share|improve this question



















  • 1




    There are a apps designed for this, e.g. itunes.apple.com/us/app/slow-shutter-cam/id357404131?mt=8. A tripod will help a lot too.
    – Tim Hopper
    Sep 11 at 17:20










  • Those who want a native solution that does not require purchasing a third-party app and clip-on ND filter, see BallpointBen's answer.
    – xiota
    Sep 18 at 8:57













up vote
6
down vote

favorite









up vote
6
down vote

favorite











I like taking pictures of flowing water on my iPhone, and I'd like to get the soft-cloudy-blur effect for the water. On a traditional lens camera, this can be done with a longer exposure time. Is this possible on an iPhone 6s? And can you describe the process?



Something like this:



waterfall koi pond










share|improve this question















I like taking pictures of flowing water on my iPhone, and I'd like to get the soft-cloudy-blur effect for the water. On a traditional lens camera, this can be done with a longer exposure time. Is this possible on an iPhone 6s? And can you describe the process?



Something like this:



waterfall koi pond







long-exposure effect iphone water






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Sep 11 at 23:22









xiota

6,06821246




6,06821246










asked Sep 10 at 22:42









Francisco d'Anconia

1335




1335







  • 1




    There are a apps designed for this, e.g. itunes.apple.com/us/app/slow-shutter-cam/id357404131?mt=8. A tripod will help a lot too.
    – Tim Hopper
    Sep 11 at 17:20










  • Those who want a native solution that does not require purchasing a third-party app and clip-on ND filter, see BallpointBen's answer.
    – xiota
    Sep 18 at 8:57













  • 1




    There are a apps designed for this, e.g. itunes.apple.com/us/app/slow-shutter-cam/id357404131?mt=8. A tripod will help a lot too.
    – Tim Hopper
    Sep 11 at 17:20










  • Those who want a native solution that does not require purchasing a third-party app and clip-on ND filter, see BallpointBen's answer.
    – xiota
    Sep 18 at 8:57








1




1




There are a apps designed for this, e.g. itunes.apple.com/us/app/slow-shutter-cam/id357404131?mt=8. A tripod will help a lot too.
– Tim Hopper
Sep 11 at 17:20




There are a apps designed for this, e.g. itunes.apple.com/us/app/slow-shutter-cam/id357404131?mt=8. A tripod will help a lot too.
– Tim Hopper
Sep 11 at 17:20












Those who want a native solution that does not require purchasing a third-party app and clip-on ND filter, see BallpointBen's answer.
– xiota
Sep 18 at 8:57





Those who want a native solution that does not require purchasing a third-party app and clip-on ND filter, see BallpointBen's answer.
– xiota
Sep 18 at 8:57











4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
4
down vote



accepted










Third-party camera application



It does not appear that the default application on iOS has any fine-grained control mode. But you can achieve that if you use a third-party camera application that gives you access to it.



This page examines how to achieve the kind of control DSLR camera users are accustomed to, and it specifically mentions long exposure of water. The page recommends a few applications. But I think there are many more, so I advice you to look through reviews of third-party camera applications closely and find one that is well suited to you.



ND filter and tripod



You may also want to look at an ND filter and a phone tripod. Phone cameras are ridiculously sensitive and in daylight you will overexpose any picture with a shutter time of 1 second or more. To prevent that from happening you need an ND filter. There are plenty of ND filters that clip onto your phone.



And of course you cannot hand-hold your phone for long exposure pictures, so get a little tripod for it too.



Examples from another brand



The default camera app on my phone has a "Pro" mode that allows fine-grained control. Below is an example of where I can manually set white-balance, ISO, shutter time and a few things more.



enter image description here



Here are some examples of where I used that mode to deliberately extend the shutter time...



enter image description here



Manually set to 4 seconds, ISO 50



enter image description here



Manually set to 1/7 seconds, ISO 200



enter image description here



Manually set to 4 seconds, ISO 80



Edit, trying myself with ND filter



So I went out today to find myself a little stream to try out my new ND filter that I got after first writing this answer.



The filter was a ZOMEi 37mm variable ND filter with a clip-on adapter.



enter image description here



Lighting conditions were: overhead clouds about an hour before sunset.



First picture is a reference, taken on full auto with HDR.



enter image description here



1/50 sec, ISO-125, automatic HDR



I had to fiddle around a bit before I found a setting that worked good. But eventually, I got something reasonable, balancing the adjustable ND filter with shutter time.



enter image description here



4 sec, ISO-50, automatic white-balance (Click for 1920 x 1080)



I tried letting Google Photos make some of them black & white, and I am fairly happy with that...



enter image description here



4 sec, ISO-50, automatic white-balance, post-processed to B&W (Click for 1920 x 1080)



...but it was also with that that I realised the 10-second pictures had turned out really grainy, even with ISO-50.



enter image description here



10 seconds, ISO-50 (Click for 1920 x 1080)



So in conclusion: yes, using an ND filter works well to allow a phone camera to extend the shutter time. And with suitable filter and/or post-processing, you can achieve those kinds of pictures you are looking for.



But beware that the phone sensor really struggles when it has to work over a very long shutter time, and even the lowest ISO setting seems to be unable to save it from some bad graininess.






share|improve this answer






















  • Camera app will do everything to keep the exposure time short. That means the ISO value will rocket and will destroy the quality instead of forcing longer exposure time. Without full manual control over ISO and exposure time, ND filter will only make things worse.
    – Mark
    Sep 11 at 12:22






  • 2




    @Mark That depends entirely on the application. This is why I am answering that OP should look for reviews of third-party camera applications. See my edit above, for an example of how different applications can be.
    – MichaelK
    Sep 11 at 13:18






  • 1




    I use Procam5 procamapp.com because i can control all functions except aperture which is fixed. i have others as well, one is called "slow shutter cam" discussed at iphonephotographyschool.com/slow-shutter-cam
    – Alaska man
    Sep 11 at 16:58






  • 1




    @MichaelK That's fantastic! Thanks for the update. Can you put a link in to the filter you purchased?
    – Francisco d'Anconia
    Sep 17 at 19:39






  • 1




    @Franciscod'Anconia It was just a cheap clip-on. But it did the job all right. Seems this model is available in many places. Amazon for instance: ZOMEi 37 mm variable ND filter, with phone clip-on.
    – MichaelK
    Sep 18 at 7:08

















up vote
14
down vote













The easiest way is to take a Live Photo, then while viewing it in the Photos app, swipe up to access effects and choose Long Exposure. This will blend the frames of Live Photo together into a single image.



I'm not sure how necessary a tripod is for this; since you're expected to hold your phone while shooting, I'd imagine the stabilization+blending software is pretty good.






share|improve this answer
















  • 2




    This is the easiest solution which gives good results using built-in functions in the iPhone.
    – Maynard Case
    Sep 11 at 9:19






  • 1




    Great answer! I never even knew this was possible
    – Francisco d'Anconia
    Sep 11 at 14:57


















up vote
5
down vote













That particular image almost has to be a fusion of two (or more images). In order to get the blur in the water, you need a relatively long exposure time, as you mentioned. But if you've ever hung around koi ponds much, you probably know that the fish aren't going to hold still that long, and since the fish in that image are not blurred at all (other than refractive blur from being under the water), the shutter speed for that portion of the image must have been fairly fast.



Whether or not you can achieve the long exposure time on an iPhone anything, I can't really answer, as I've never used any camera app on any iPhone. But I would guess that either the built in camera app or a third party one should give you that capability somehow. I know even the built-in Android camera app allows you to do things in manual mode - I would be surprised if iPhone were less capable in that way.






share|improve this answer
















  • 4




    ... Surprise...
    – xiota
    Sep 11 at 0:18






  • 6




    I wouldn't be so sure: falling water blurs quickly, 1/10 to 1/2 seconds could be enough for such effect, the fish wouldn't swim away. To me the fish seem more consistent with the motion blur, not with refraction. Their fins and tails seem particularly blurred, which speaks in favour of a single exposure. Same goes for the pond surface: a bit smooth but traces of ripples still detectable.
    – IMil
    Sep 11 at 3:00










  • @IMil In half a second, a koi would easily swim a significant fraction of its own length, so I don't think the exposure could be that long.
    – David Richerby
    Sep 11 at 12:16






  • 1




    It could, if it was swimming. But maybe they rested at the time? Well, can be one way or the other. I guess having the original photo (or photos if it's a mixture) with all EXIF tags, etc, would be the only definite proof.
    – IMil
    Sep 11 at 13:05

















up vote
5
down vote













The native iPhone camera app does not allow manual exposure control. You would need to use a third-party camera app to control the shutter speed. However, there is a Long Exposure effect that can be applied to Live Photos. BallpointBen describes how to use the feature.



You may also simulate long exposures by blending multiple frames together. Use the iPhone burst mode to capture a series of images by holding down the shutter button. Align and combine the images using median blending mode with tools such as Photoshop, align_image_stack, or ImageMagick. See How to Improve Your Long Exposure Photography with Photo Stacking.






share|improve this answer






















    Your Answer







    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "61"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f101364%2fhow-to-get-soft-blur-effect-on-flowing-water-with-iphone%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes








    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    4
    down vote



    accepted










    Third-party camera application



    It does not appear that the default application on iOS has any fine-grained control mode. But you can achieve that if you use a third-party camera application that gives you access to it.



    This page examines how to achieve the kind of control DSLR camera users are accustomed to, and it specifically mentions long exposure of water. The page recommends a few applications. But I think there are many more, so I advice you to look through reviews of third-party camera applications closely and find one that is well suited to you.



    ND filter and tripod



    You may also want to look at an ND filter and a phone tripod. Phone cameras are ridiculously sensitive and in daylight you will overexpose any picture with a shutter time of 1 second or more. To prevent that from happening you need an ND filter. There are plenty of ND filters that clip onto your phone.



    And of course you cannot hand-hold your phone for long exposure pictures, so get a little tripod for it too.



    Examples from another brand



    The default camera app on my phone has a "Pro" mode that allows fine-grained control. Below is an example of where I can manually set white-balance, ISO, shutter time and a few things more.



    enter image description here



    Here are some examples of where I used that mode to deliberately extend the shutter time...



    enter image description here



    Manually set to 4 seconds, ISO 50



    enter image description here



    Manually set to 1/7 seconds, ISO 200



    enter image description here



    Manually set to 4 seconds, ISO 80



    Edit, trying myself with ND filter



    So I went out today to find myself a little stream to try out my new ND filter that I got after first writing this answer.



    The filter was a ZOMEi 37mm variable ND filter with a clip-on adapter.



    enter image description here



    Lighting conditions were: overhead clouds about an hour before sunset.



    First picture is a reference, taken on full auto with HDR.



    enter image description here



    1/50 sec, ISO-125, automatic HDR



    I had to fiddle around a bit before I found a setting that worked good. But eventually, I got something reasonable, balancing the adjustable ND filter with shutter time.



    enter image description here



    4 sec, ISO-50, automatic white-balance (Click for 1920 x 1080)



    I tried letting Google Photos make some of them black & white, and I am fairly happy with that...



    enter image description here



    4 sec, ISO-50, automatic white-balance, post-processed to B&W (Click for 1920 x 1080)



    ...but it was also with that that I realised the 10-second pictures had turned out really grainy, even with ISO-50.



    enter image description here



    10 seconds, ISO-50 (Click for 1920 x 1080)



    So in conclusion: yes, using an ND filter works well to allow a phone camera to extend the shutter time. And with suitable filter and/or post-processing, you can achieve those kinds of pictures you are looking for.



    But beware that the phone sensor really struggles when it has to work over a very long shutter time, and even the lowest ISO setting seems to be unable to save it from some bad graininess.






    share|improve this answer






















    • Camera app will do everything to keep the exposure time short. That means the ISO value will rocket and will destroy the quality instead of forcing longer exposure time. Without full manual control over ISO and exposure time, ND filter will only make things worse.
      – Mark
      Sep 11 at 12:22






    • 2




      @Mark That depends entirely on the application. This is why I am answering that OP should look for reviews of third-party camera applications. See my edit above, for an example of how different applications can be.
      – MichaelK
      Sep 11 at 13:18






    • 1




      I use Procam5 procamapp.com because i can control all functions except aperture which is fixed. i have others as well, one is called "slow shutter cam" discussed at iphonephotographyschool.com/slow-shutter-cam
      – Alaska man
      Sep 11 at 16:58






    • 1




      @MichaelK That's fantastic! Thanks for the update. Can you put a link in to the filter you purchased?
      – Francisco d'Anconia
      Sep 17 at 19:39






    • 1




      @Franciscod'Anconia It was just a cheap clip-on. But it did the job all right. Seems this model is available in many places. Amazon for instance: ZOMEi 37 mm variable ND filter, with phone clip-on.
      – MichaelK
      Sep 18 at 7:08














    up vote
    4
    down vote



    accepted










    Third-party camera application



    It does not appear that the default application on iOS has any fine-grained control mode. But you can achieve that if you use a third-party camera application that gives you access to it.



    This page examines how to achieve the kind of control DSLR camera users are accustomed to, and it specifically mentions long exposure of water. The page recommends a few applications. But I think there are many more, so I advice you to look through reviews of third-party camera applications closely and find one that is well suited to you.



    ND filter and tripod



    You may also want to look at an ND filter and a phone tripod. Phone cameras are ridiculously sensitive and in daylight you will overexpose any picture with a shutter time of 1 second or more. To prevent that from happening you need an ND filter. There are plenty of ND filters that clip onto your phone.



    And of course you cannot hand-hold your phone for long exposure pictures, so get a little tripod for it too.



    Examples from another brand



    The default camera app on my phone has a "Pro" mode that allows fine-grained control. Below is an example of where I can manually set white-balance, ISO, shutter time and a few things more.



    enter image description here



    Here are some examples of where I used that mode to deliberately extend the shutter time...



    enter image description here



    Manually set to 4 seconds, ISO 50



    enter image description here



    Manually set to 1/7 seconds, ISO 200



    enter image description here



    Manually set to 4 seconds, ISO 80



    Edit, trying myself with ND filter



    So I went out today to find myself a little stream to try out my new ND filter that I got after first writing this answer.



    The filter was a ZOMEi 37mm variable ND filter with a clip-on adapter.



    enter image description here



    Lighting conditions were: overhead clouds about an hour before sunset.



    First picture is a reference, taken on full auto with HDR.



    enter image description here



    1/50 sec, ISO-125, automatic HDR



    I had to fiddle around a bit before I found a setting that worked good. But eventually, I got something reasonable, balancing the adjustable ND filter with shutter time.



    enter image description here



    4 sec, ISO-50, automatic white-balance (Click for 1920 x 1080)



    I tried letting Google Photos make some of them black & white, and I am fairly happy with that...



    enter image description here



    4 sec, ISO-50, automatic white-balance, post-processed to B&W (Click for 1920 x 1080)



    ...but it was also with that that I realised the 10-second pictures had turned out really grainy, even with ISO-50.



    enter image description here



    10 seconds, ISO-50 (Click for 1920 x 1080)



    So in conclusion: yes, using an ND filter works well to allow a phone camera to extend the shutter time. And with suitable filter and/or post-processing, you can achieve those kinds of pictures you are looking for.



    But beware that the phone sensor really struggles when it has to work over a very long shutter time, and even the lowest ISO setting seems to be unable to save it from some bad graininess.






    share|improve this answer






















    • Camera app will do everything to keep the exposure time short. That means the ISO value will rocket and will destroy the quality instead of forcing longer exposure time. Without full manual control over ISO and exposure time, ND filter will only make things worse.
      – Mark
      Sep 11 at 12:22






    • 2




      @Mark That depends entirely on the application. This is why I am answering that OP should look for reviews of third-party camera applications. See my edit above, for an example of how different applications can be.
      – MichaelK
      Sep 11 at 13:18






    • 1




      I use Procam5 procamapp.com because i can control all functions except aperture which is fixed. i have others as well, one is called "slow shutter cam" discussed at iphonephotographyschool.com/slow-shutter-cam
      – Alaska man
      Sep 11 at 16:58






    • 1




      @MichaelK That's fantastic! Thanks for the update. Can you put a link in to the filter you purchased?
      – Francisco d'Anconia
      Sep 17 at 19:39






    • 1




      @Franciscod'Anconia It was just a cheap clip-on. But it did the job all right. Seems this model is available in many places. Amazon for instance: ZOMEi 37 mm variable ND filter, with phone clip-on.
      – MichaelK
      Sep 18 at 7:08












    up vote
    4
    down vote



    accepted







    up vote
    4
    down vote



    accepted






    Third-party camera application



    It does not appear that the default application on iOS has any fine-grained control mode. But you can achieve that if you use a third-party camera application that gives you access to it.



    This page examines how to achieve the kind of control DSLR camera users are accustomed to, and it specifically mentions long exposure of water. The page recommends a few applications. But I think there are many more, so I advice you to look through reviews of third-party camera applications closely and find one that is well suited to you.



    ND filter and tripod



    You may also want to look at an ND filter and a phone tripod. Phone cameras are ridiculously sensitive and in daylight you will overexpose any picture with a shutter time of 1 second or more. To prevent that from happening you need an ND filter. There are plenty of ND filters that clip onto your phone.



    And of course you cannot hand-hold your phone for long exposure pictures, so get a little tripod for it too.



    Examples from another brand



    The default camera app on my phone has a "Pro" mode that allows fine-grained control. Below is an example of where I can manually set white-balance, ISO, shutter time and a few things more.



    enter image description here



    Here are some examples of where I used that mode to deliberately extend the shutter time...



    enter image description here



    Manually set to 4 seconds, ISO 50



    enter image description here



    Manually set to 1/7 seconds, ISO 200



    enter image description here



    Manually set to 4 seconds, ISO 80



    Edit, trying myself with ND filter



    So I went out today to find myself a little stream to try out my new ND filter that I got after first writing this answer.



    The filter was a ZOMEi 37mm variable ND filter with a clip-on adapter.



    enter image description here



    Lighting conditions were: overhead clouds about an hour before sunset.



    First picture is a reference, taken on full auto with HDR.



    enter image description here



    1/50 sec, ISO-125, automatic HDR



    I had to fiddle around a bit before I found a setting that worked good. But eventually, I got something reasonable, balancing the adjustable ND filter with shutter time.



    enter image description here



    4 sec, ISO-50, automatic white-balance (Click for 1920 x 1080)



    I tried letting Google Photos make some of them black & white, and I am fairly happy with that...



    enter image description here



    4 sec, ISO-50, automatic white-balance, post-processed to B&W (Click for 1920 x 1080)



    ...but it was also with that that I realised the 10-second pictures had turned out really grainy, even with ISO-50.



    enter image description here



    10 seconds, ISO-50 (Click for 1920 x 1080)



    So in conclusion: yes, using an ND filter works well to allow a phone camera to extend the shutter time. And with suitable filter and/or post-processing, you can achieve those kinds of pictures you are looking for.



    But beware that the phone sensor really struggles when it has to work over a very long shutter time, and even the lowest ISO setting seems to be unable to save it from some bad graininess.






    share|improve this answer














    Third-party camera application



    It does not appear that the default application on iOS has any fine-grained control mode. But you can achieve that if you use a third-party camera application that gives you access to it.



    This page examines how to achieve the kind of control DSLR camera users are accustomed to, and it specifically mentions long exposure of water. The page recommends a few applications. But I think there are many more, so I advice you to look through reviews of third-party camera applications closely and find one that is well suited to you.



    ND filter and tripod



    You may also want to look at an ND filter and a phone tripod. Phone cameras are ridiculously sensitive and in daylight you will overexpose any picture with a shutter time of 1 second or more. To prevent that from happening you need an ND filter. There are plenty of ND filters that clip onto your phone.



    And of course you cannot hand-hold your phone for long exposure pictures, so get a little tripod for it too.



    Examples from another brand



    The default camera app on my phone has a "Pro" mode that allows fine-grained control. Below is an example of where I can manually set white-balance, ISO, shutter time and a few things more.



    enter image description here



    Here are some examples of where I used that mode to deliberately extend the shutter time...



    enter image description here



    Manually set to 4 seconds, ISO 50



    enter image description here



    Manually set to 1/7 seconds, ISO 200



    enter image description here



    Manually set to 4 seconds, ISO 80



    Edit, trying myself with ND filter



    So I went out today to find myself a little stream to try out my new ND filter that I got after first writing this answer.



    The filter was a ZOMEi 37mm variable ND filter with a clip-on adapter.



    enter image description here



    Lighting conditions were: overhead clouds about an hour before sunset.



    First picture is a reference, taken on full auto with HDR.



    enter image description here



    1/50 sec, ISO-125, automatic HDR



    I had to fiddle around a bit before I found a setting that worked good. But eventually, I got something reasonable, balancing the adjustable ND filter with shutter time.



    enter image description here



    4 sec, ISO-50, automatic white-balance (Click for 1920 x 1080)



    I tried letting Google Photos make some of them black & white, and I am fairly happy with that...



    enter image description here



    4 sec, ISO-50, automatic white-balance, post-processed to B&W (Click for 1920 x 1080)



    ...but it was also with that that I realised the 10-second pictures had turned out really grainy, even with ISO-50.



    enter image description here



    10 seconds, ISO-50 (Click for 1920 x 1080)



    So in conclusion: yes, using an ND filter works well to allow a phone camera to extend the shutter time. And with suitable filter and/or post-processing, you can achieve those kinds of pictures you are looking for.



    But beware that the phone sensor really struggles when it has to work over a very long shutter time, and even the lowest ISO setting seems to be unable to save it from some bad graininess.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Sep 18 at 8:12

























    answered Sep 11 at 9:02









    MichaelK

    1624




    1624











    • Camera app will do everything to keep the exposure time short. That means the ISO value will rocket and will destroy the quality instead of forcing longer exposure time. Without full manual control over ISO and exposure time, ND filter will only make things worse.
      – Mark
      Sep 11 at 12:22






    • 2




      @Mark That depends entirely on the application. This is why I am answering that OP should look for reviews of third-party camera applications. See my edit above, for an example of how different applications can be.
      – MichaelK
      Sep 11 at 13:18






    • 1




      I use Procam5 procamapp.com because i can control all functions except aperture which is fixed. i have others as well, one is called "slow shutter cam" discussed at iphonephotographyschool.com/slow-shutter-cam
      – Alaska man
      Sep 11 at 16:58






    • 1




      @MichaelK That's fantastic! Thanks for the update. Can you put a link in to the filter you purchased?
      – Francisco d'Anconia
      Sep 17 at 19:39






    • 1




      @Franciscod'Anconia It was just a cheap clip-on. But it did the job all right. Seems this model is available in many places. Amazon for instance: ZOMEi 37 mm variable ND filter, with phone clip-on.
      – MichaelK
      Sep 18 at 7:08
















    • Camera app will do everything to keep the exposure time short. That means the ISO value will rocket and will destroy the quality instead of forcing longer exposure time. Without full manual control over ISO and exposure time, ND filter will only make things worse.
      – Mark
      Sep 11 at 12:22






    • 2




      @Mark That depends entirely on the application. This is why I am answering that OP should look for reviews of third-party camera applications. See my edit above, for an example of how different applications can be.
      – MichaelK
      Sep 11 at 13:18






    • 1




      I use Procam5 procamapp.com because i can control all functions except aperture which is fixed. i have others as well, one is called "slow shutter cam" discussed at iphonephotographyschool.com/slow-shutter-cam
      – Alaska man
      Sep 11 at 16:58






    • 1




      @MichaelK That's fantastic! Thanks for the update. Can you put a link in to the filter you purchased?
      – Francisco d'Anconia
      Sep 17 at 19:39






    • 1




      @Franciscod'Anconia It was just a cheap clip-on. But it did the job all right. Seems this model is available in many places. Amazon for instance: ZOMEi 37 mm variable ND filter, with phone clip-on.
      – MichaelK
      Sep 18 at 7:08















    Camera app will do everything to keep the exposure time short. That means the ISO value will rocket and will destroy the quality instead of forcing longer exposure time. Without full manual control over ISO and exposure time, ND filter will only make things worse.
    – Mark
    Sep 11 at 12:22




    Camera app will do everything to keep the exposure time short. That means the ISO value will rocket and will destroy the quality instead of forcing longer exposure time. Without full manual control over ISO and exposure time, ND filter will only make things worse.
    – Mark
    Sep 11 at 12:22




    2




    2




    @Mark That depends entirely on the application. This is why I am answering that OP should look for reviews of third-party camera applications. See my edit above, for an example of how different applications can be.
    – MichaelK
    Sep 11 at 13:18




    @Mark That depends entirely on the application. This is why I am answering that OP should look for reviews of third-party camera applications. See my edit above, for an example of how different applications can be.
    – MichaelK
    Sep 11 at 13:18




    1




    1




    I use Procam5 procamapp.com because i can control all functions except aperture which is fixed. i have others as well, one is called "slow shutter cam" discussed at iphonephotographyschool.com/slow-shutter-cam
    – Alaska man
    Sep 11 at 16:58




    I use Procam5 procamapp.com because i can control all functions except aperture which is fixed. i have others as well, one is called "slow shutter cam" discussed at iphonephotographyschool.com/slow-shutter-cam
    – Alaska man
    Sep 11 at 16:58




    1




    1




    @MichaelK That's fantastic! Thanks for the update. Can you put a link in to the filter you purchased?
    – Francisco d'Anconia
    Sep 17 at 19:39




    @MichaelK That's fantastic! Thanks for the update. Can you put a link in to the filter you purchased?
    – Francisco d'Anconia
    Sep 17 at 19:39




    1




    1




    @Franciscod'Anconia It was just a cheap clip-on. But it did the job all right. Seems this model is available in many places. Amazon for instance: ZOMEi 37 mm variable ND filter, with phone clip-on.
    – MichaelK
    Sep 18 at 7:08




    @Franciscod'Anconia It was just a cheap clip-on. But it did the job all right. Seems this model is available in many places. Amazon for instance: ZOMEi 37 mm variable ND filter, with phone clip-on.
    – MichaelK
    Sep 18 at 7:08












    up vote
    14
    down vote













    The easiest way is to take a Live Photo, then while viewing it in the Photos app, swipe up to access effects and choose Long Exposure. This will blend the frames of Live Photo together into a single image.



    I'm not sure how necessary a tripod is for this; since you're expected to hold your phone while shooting, I'd imagine the stabilization+blending software is pretty good.






    share|improve this answer
















    • 2




      This is the easiest solution which gives good results using built-in functions in the iPhone.
      – Maynard Case
      Sep 11 at 9:19






    • 1




      Great answer! I never even knew this was possible
      – Francisco d'Anconia
      Sep 11 at 14:57















    up vote
    14
    down vote













    The easiest way is to take a Live Photo, then while viewing it in the Photos app, swipe up to access effects and choose Long Exposure. This will blend the frames of Live Photo together into a single image.



    I'm not sure how necessary a tripod is for this; since you're expected to hold your phone while shooting, I'd imagine the stabilization+blending software is pretty good.






    share|improve this answer
















    • 2




      This is the easiest solution which gives good results using built-in functions in the iPhone.
      – Maynard Case
      Sep 11 at 9:19






    • 1




      Great answer! I never even knew this was possible
      – Francisco d'Anconia
      Sep 11 at 14:57













    up vote
    14
    down vote










    up vote
    14
    down vote









    The easiest way is to take a Live Photo, then while viewing it in the Photos app, swipe up to access effects and choose Long Exposure. This will blend the frames of Live Photo together into a single image.



    I'm not sure how necessary a tripod is for this; since you're expected to hold your phone while shooting, I'd imagine the stabilization+blending software is pretty good.






    share|improve this answer












    The easiest way is to take a Live Photo, then while viewing it in the Photos app, swipe up to access effects and choose Long Exposure. This will blend the frames of Live Photo together into a single image.



    I'm not sure how necessary a tripod is for this; since you're expected to hold your phone while shooting, I'd imagine the stabilization+blending software is pretty good.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Sep 11 at 5:40









    BallpointBen

    24114




    24114







    • 2




      This is the easiest solution which gives good results using built-in functions in the iPhone.
      – Maynard Case
      Sep 11 at 9:19






    • 1




      Great answer! I never even knew this was possible
      – Francisco d'Anconia
      Sep 11 at 14:57













    • 2




      This is the easiest solution which gives good results using built-in functions in the iPhone.
      – Maynard Case
      Sep 11 at 9:19






    • 1




      Great answer! I never even knew this was possible
      – Francisco d'Anconia
      Sep 11 at 14:57








    2




    2




    This is the easiest solution which gives good results using built-in functions in the iPhone.
    – Maynard Case
    Sep 11 at 9:19




    This is the easiest solution which gives good results using built-in functions in the iPhone.
    – Maynard Case
    Sep 11 at 9:19




    1




    1




    Great answer! I never even knew this was possible
    – Francisco d'Anconia
    Sep 11 at 14:57





    Great answer! I never even knew this was possible
    – Francisco d'Anconia
    Sep 11 at 14:57











    up vote
    5
    down vote













    That particular image almost has to be a fusion of two (or more images). In order to get the blur in the water, you need a relatively long exposure time, as you mentioned. But if you've ever hung around koi ponds much, you probably know that the fish aren't going to hold still that long, and since the fish in that image are not blurred at all (other than refractive blur from being under the water), the shutter speed for that portion of the image must have been fairly fast.



    Whether or not you can achieve the long exposure time on an iPhone anything, I can't really answer, as I've never used any camera app on any iPhone. But I would guess that either the built in camera app or a third party one should give you that capability somehow. I know even the built-in Android camera app allows you to do things in manual mode - I would be surprised if iPhone were less capable in that way.






    share|improve this answer
















    • 4




      ... Surprise...
      – xiota
      Sep 11 at 0:18






    • 6




      I wouldn't be so sure: falling water blurs quickly, 1/10 to 1/2 seconds could be enough for such effect, the fish wouldn't swim away. To me the fish seem more consistent with the motion blur, not with refraction. Their fins and tails seem particularly blurred, which speaks in favour of a single exposure. Same goes for the pond surface: a bit smooth but traces of ripples still detectable.
      – IMil
      Sep 11 at 3:00










    • @IMil In half a second, a koi would easily swim a significant fraction of its own length, so I don't think the exposure could be that long.
      – David Richerby
      Sep 11 at 12:16






    • 1




      It could, if it was swimming. But maybe they rested at the time? Well, can be one way or the other. I guess having the original photo (or photos if it's a mixture) with all EXIF tags, etc, would be the only definite proof.
      – IMil
      Sep 11 at 13:05














    up vote
    5
    down vote













    That particular image almost has to be a fusion of two (or more images). In order to get the blur in the water, you need a relatively long exposure time, as you mentioned. But if you've ever hung around koi ponds much, you probably know that the fish aren't going to hold still that long, and since the fish in that image are not blurred at all (other than refractive blur from being under the water), the shutter speed for that portion of the image must have been fairly fast.



    Whether or not you can achieve the long exposure time on an iPhone anything, I can't really answer, as I've never used any camera app on any iPhone. But I would guess that either the built in camera app or a third party one should give you that capability somehow. I know even the built-in Android camera app allows you to do things in manual mode - I would be surprised if iPhone were less capable in that way.






    share|improve this answer
















    • 4




      ... Surprise...
      – xiota
      Sep 11 at 0:18






    • 6




      I wouldn't be so sure: falling water blurs quickly, 1/10 to 1/2 seconds could be enough for such effect, the fish wouldn't swim away. To me the fish seem more consistent with the motion blur, not with refraction. Their fins and tails seem particularly blurred, which speaks in favour of a single exposure. Same goes for the pond surface: a bit smooth but traces of ripples still detectable.
      – IMil
      Sep 11 at 3:00










    • @IMil In half a second, a koi would easily swim a significant fraction of its own length, so I don't think the exposure could be that long.
      – David Richerby
      Sep 11 at 12:16






    • 1




      It could, if it was swimming. But maybe they rested at the time? Well, can be one way or the other. I guess having the original photo (or photos if it's a mixture) with all EXIF tags, etc, would be the only definite proof.
      – IMil
      Sep 11 at 13:05












    up vote
    5
    down vote










    up vote
    5
    down vote









    That particular image almost has to be a fusion of two (or more images). In order to get the blur in the water, you need a relatively long exposure time, as you mentioned. But if you've ever hung around koi ponds much, you probably know that the fish aren't going to hold still that long, and since the fish in that image are not blurred at all (other than refractive blur from being under the water), the shutter speed for that portion of the image must have been fairly fast.



    Whether or not you can achieve the long exposure time on an iPhone anything, I can't really answer, as I've never used any camera app on any iPhone. But I would guess that either the built in camera app or a third party one should give you that capability somehow. I know even the built-in Android camera app allows you to do things in manual mode - I would be surprised if iPhone were less capable in that way.






    share|improve this answer












    That particular image almost has to be a fusion of two (or more images). In order to get the blur in the water, you need a relatively long exposure time, as you mentioned. But if you've ever hung around koi ponds much, you probably know that the fish aren't going to hold still that long, and since the fish in that image are not blurred at all (other than refractive blur from being under the water), the shutter speed for that portion of the image must have been fairly fast.



    Whether or not you can achieve the long exposure time on an iPhone anything, I can't really answer, as I've never used any camera app on any iPhone. But I would guess that either the built in camera app or a third party one should give you that capability somehow. I know even the built-in Android camera app allows you to do things in manual mode - I would be surprised if iPhone were less capable in that way.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Sep 10 at 22:47









    twalberg

    1,920510




    1,920510







    • 4




      ... Surprise...
      – xiota
      Sep 11 at 0:18






    • 6




      I wouldn't be so sure: falling water blurs quickly, 1/10 to 1/2 seconds could be enough for such effect, the fish wouldn't swim away. To me the fish seem more consistent with the motion blur, not with refraction. Their fins and tails seem particularly blurred, which speaks in favour of a single exposure. Same goes for the pond surface: a bit smooth but traces of ripples still detectable.
      – IMil
      Sep 11 at 3:00










    • @IMil In half a second, a koi would easily swim a significant fraction of its own length, so I don't think the exposure could be that long.
      – David Richerby
      Sep 11 at 12:16






    • 1




      It could, if it was swimming. But maybe they rested at the time? Well, can be one way or the other. I guess having the original photo (or photos if it's a mixture) with all EXIF tags, etc, would be the only definite proof.
      – IMil
      Sep 11 at 13:05












    • 4




      ... Surprise...
      – xiota
      Sep 11 at 0:18






    • 6




      I wouldn't be so sure: falling water blurs quickly, 1/10 to 1/2 seconds could be enough for such effect, the fish wouldn't swim away. To me the fish seem more consistent with the motion blur, not with refraction. Their fins and tails seem particularly blurred, which speaks in favour of a single exposure. Same goes for the pond surface: a bit smooth but traces of ripples still detectable.
      – IMil
      Sep 11 at 3:00










    • @IMil In half a second, a koi would easily swim a significant fraction of its own length, so I don't think the exposure could be that long.
      – David Richerby
      Sep 11 at 12:16






    • 1




      It could, if it was swimming. But maybe they rested at the time? Well, can be one way or the other. I guess having the original photo (or photos if it's a mixture) with all EXIF tags, etc, would be the only definite proof.
      – IMil
      Sep 11 at 13:05







    4




    4




    ... Surprise...
    – xiota
    Sep 11 at 0:18




    ... Surprise...
    – xiota
    Sep 11 at 0:18




    6




    6




    I wouldn't be so sure: falling water blurs quickly, 1/10 to 1/2 seconds could be enough for such effect, the fish wouldn't swim away. To me the fish seem more consistent with the motion blur, not with refraction. Their fins and tails seem particularly blurred, which speaks in favour of a single exposure. Same goes for the pond surface: a bit smooth but traces of ripples still detectable.
    – IMil
    Sep 11 at 3:00




    I wouldn't be so sure: falling water blurs quickly, 1/10 to 1/2 seconds could be enough for such effect, the fish wouldn't swim away. To me the fish seem more consistent with the motion blur, not with refraction. Their fins and tails seem particularly blurred, which speaks in favour of a single exposure. Same goes for the pond surface: a bit smooth but traces of ripples still detectable.
    – IMil
    Sep 11 at 3:00












    @IMil In half a second, a koi would easily swim a significant fraction of its own length, so I don't think the exposure could be that long.
    – David Richerby
    Sep 11 at 12:16




    @IMil In half a second, a koi would easily swim a significant fraction of its own length, so I don't think the exposure could be that long.
    – David Richerby
    Sep 11 at 12:16




    1




    1




    It could, if it was swimming. But maybe they rested at the time? Well, can be one way or the other. I guess having the original photo (or photos if it's a mixture) with all EXIF tags, etc, would be the only definite proof.
    – IMil
    Sep 11 at 13:05




    It could, if it was swimming. But maybe they rested at the time? Well, can be one way or the other. I guess having the original photo (or photos if it's a mixture) with all EXIF tags, etc, would be the only definite proof.
    – IMil
    Sep 11 at 13:05










    up vote
    5
    down vote













    The native iPhone camera app does not allow manual exposure control. You would need to use a third-party camera app to control the shutter speed. However, there is a Long Exposure effect that can be applied to Live Photos. BallpointBen describes how to use the feature.



    You may also simulate long exposures by blending multiple frames together. Use the iPhone burst mode to capture a series of images by holding down the shutter button. Align and combine the images using median blending mode with tools such as Photoshop, align_image_stack, or ImageMagick. See How to Improve Your Long Exposure Photography with Photo Stacking.






    share|improve this answer


























      up vote
      5
      down vote













      The native iPhone camera app does not allow manual exposure control. You would need to use a third-party camera app to control the shutter speed. However, there is a Long Exposure effect that can be applied to Live Photos. BallpointBen describes how to use the feature.



      You may also simulate long exposures by blending multiple frames together. Use the iPhone burst mode to capture a series of images by holding down the shutter button. Align and combine the images using median blending mode with tools such as Photoshop, align_image_stack, or ImageMagick. See How to Improve Your Long Exposure Photography with Photo Stacking.






      share|improve this answer
























        up vote
        5
        down vote










        up vote
        5
        down vote









        The native iPhone camera app does not allow manual exposure control. You would need to use a third-party camera app to control the shutter speed. However, there is a Long Exposure effect that can be applied to Live Photos. BallpointBen describes how to use the feature.



        You may also simulate long exposures by blending multiple frames together. Use the iPhone burst mode to capture a series of images by holding down the shutter button. Align and combine the images using median blending mode with tools such as Photoshop, align_image_stack, or ImageMagick. See How to Improve Your Long Exposure Photography with Photo Stacking.






        share|improve this answer














        The native iPhone camera app does not allow manual exposure control. You would need to use a third-party camera app to control the shutter speed. However, there is a Long Exposure effect that can be applied to Live Photos. BallpointBen describes how to use the feature.



        You may also simulate long exposures by blending multiple frames together. Use the iPhone burst mode to capture a series of images by holding down the shutter button. Align and combine the images using median blending mode with tools such as Photoshop, align_image_stack, or ImageMagick. See How to Improve Your Long Exposure Photography with Photo Stacking.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Sep 11 at 23:19

























        answered Sep 11 at 0:14









        xiota

        6,06821246




        6,06821246



























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f101364%2fhow-to-get-soft-blur-effect-on-flowing-water-with-iphone%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            Popular posts from this blog

            How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

            Bahrain

            Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay