Fuser returns empty list for opened file
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Why when I do:
$ kate file.txt &
and
$ fuser file.txt
I've got empty list. After all, kate process opens file.txt
linux files fuser
asked Oct 20 '17 at 5:40
asdas
1
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Why when I do:
$ kate file.txt &
and
$ fuser file.txt
I've got empty list. After all, kate process opens file.txt
linux files fuser
asked Oct 20 '17 at 5:40
asdas
1
1
Depends on how kate manages its files. A better test would be to run tail -f file.txt and then fuser file.txt while tail is running. Also what does lsof file.txt say?
– bytefire
Oct 20 '17 at 6:39
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Why when I do:
$ kate file.txt &
and
$ fuser file.txt
I've got empty list. After all, kate process opens file.txt
linux files fuser
asked Oct 20 '17 at 5:40
asdas
1
Why when I do:
$ kate file.txt &
and
$ fuser file.txt
I've got empty list. After all, kate process opens file.txt
linux files fuser
asked Oct 20 '17 at 5:40
asdas
1
asked Oct 20 '17 at 5:40
asdas
1
asked Oct 20 '17 at 5:40
asdas
1
asked Oct 20 '17 at 5:40
asdas
1
1
1
Depends on how kate manages its files. A better test would be to run tail -f file.txt and then fuser file.txt while tail is running. Also what does lsof file.txt say?
– bytefire
Oct 20 '17 at 6:39
add a comment |Â
1
Depends on how kate manages its files. A better test would be to run tail -f file.txt and then fuser file.txt while tail is running. Also what does lsof file.txt say?
– bytefire
Oct 20 '17 at 6:39
1
1
Depends on how kate manages its files. A better test would be to run tail -f file.txt and then fuser file.txt while tail is running. Also what does lsof file.txt say?
– bytefire
Oct 20 '17 at 6:39
Depends on how kate manages its files. A better test would be to run tail -f file.txt and then fuser file.txt while tail is running. Also what does lsof file.txt say?
– bytefire
Oct 20 '17 at 6:39
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
It means that when you run fuser file.txt, process kate has already finished accessing the file.
Adapted from the manpage: fuser displays the PIDs of processes currently using the specified files or file systems.
answered Oct 20 '17 at 6:56
dr01
15.3k114769
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
It means that when you run fuser file.txt, process kate has already finished accessing the file.
Adapted from the manpage: fuser displays the PIDs of processes currently using the specified files or file systems.
answered Oct 20 '17 at 6:56
dr01
15.3k114769
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
It means that when you run fuser file.txt, process kate has already finished accessing the file.
Adapted from the manpage: fuser displays the PIDs of processes currently using the specified files or file systems.
answered Oct 20 '17 at 6:56
dr01
15.3k114769
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
It means that when you run fuser file.txt, process kate has already finished accessing the file.
Adapted from the manpage: fuser displays the PIDs of processes currently using the specified files or file systems.
answered Oct 20 '17 at 6:56
dr01
15.3k114769
It means that when you run fuser file.txt, process kate has already finished accessing the file.
Adapted from the manpage: fuser displays the PIDs of processes currently using the specified files or file systems.
answered Oct 20 '17 at 6:56
dr01
15.3k114769
answered Oct 20 '17 at 6:56
dr01
15.3k114769
answered Oct 20 '17 at 6:56
dr01
15.3k114769
answered Oct 20 '17 at 6:56
dr01
15.3k114769
15.3k114769
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f399270%2ffuser-returns-empty-list-for-opened-file%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
1
Depends on how kate manages its files. A better test would be to run tail -f file.txt and then fuser file.txt while tail is running. Also what does lsof file.txt say?
– bytefire
Oct 20 '17 at 6:39