Did Truman threaten a nuclear strike if the Soviet Union didn't withdraw from Iran in 1946?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
13
down vote

favorite












In episode 4 of Oliver Stone's documentary series, Untold History of the United States, Stone claims that then-president Truman issued an ultimatum to the Soviet Union: either withdraw from Iran (which was partly occupied by the Soviet Union in 1946) or face a nuclear strike.



My googling did not result in a reliable source; on the contrary, it seems that Truman was merely bragging about his power in private, and the real reason for the Soviet withdrawal might have been that they managed to obtain oil concessions from Iran.



Did Truman really threaten a nuclear strike or was he just bragging?










share|improve this question



















  • 4




    Oliver Stone never met a conspiracy theory he couldn't roll into a movie.
    – Pieter Geerkens
    Aug 19 at 17:36














up vote
13
down vote

favorite












In episode 4 of Oliver Stone's documentary series, Untold History of the United States, Stone claims that then-president Truman issued an ultimatum to the Soviet Union: either withdraw from Iran (which was partly occupied by the Soviet Union in 1946) or face a nuclear strike.



My googling did not result in a reliable source; on the contrary, it seems that Truman was merely bragging about his power in private, and the real reason for the Soviet withdrawal might have been that they managed to obtain oil concessions from Iran.



Did Truman really threaten a nuclear strike or was he just bragging?










share|improve this question



















  • 4




    Oliver Stone never met a conspiracy theory he couldn't roll into a movie.
    – Pieter Geerkens
    Aug 19 at 17:36












up vote
13
down vote

favorite









up vote
13
down vote

favorite











In episode 4 of Oliver Stone's documentary series, Untold History of the United States, Stone claims that then-president Truman issued an ultimatum to the Soviet Union: either withdraw from Iran (which was partly occupied by the Soviet Union in 1946) or face a nuclear strike.



My googling did not result in a reliable source; on the contrary, it seems that Truman was merely bragging about his power in private, and the real reason for the Soviet withdrawal might have been that they managed to obtain oil concessions from Iran.



Did Truman really threaten a nuclear strike or was he just bragging?










share|improve this question















In episode 4 of Oliver Stone's documentary series, Untold History of the United States, Stone claims that then-president Truman issued an ultimatum to the Soviet Union: either withdraw from Iran (which was partly occupied by the Soviet Union in 1946) or face a nuclear strike.



My googling did not result in a reliable source; on the contrary, it seems that Truman was merely bragging about his power in private, and the real reason for the Soviet withdrawal might have been that they managed to obtain oil concessions from Iran.



Did Truman really threaten a nuclear strike or was he just bragging?







united-states soviet-union cold-war iran






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Aug 19 at 22:44









Lars Bosteen

28.9k7145199




28.9k7145199










asked Aug 19 at 11:00









Zeick

4201413




4201413







  • 4




    Oliver Stone never met a conspiracy theory he couldn't roll into a movie.
    – Pieter Geerkens
    Aug 19 at 17:36












  • 4




    Oliver Stone never met a conspiracy theory he couldn't roll into a movie.
    – Pieter Geerkens
    Aug 19 at 17:36







4




4




Oliver Stone never met a conspiracy theory he couldn't roll into a movie.
– Pieter Geerkens
Aug 19 at 17:36




Oliver Stone never met a conspiracy theory he couldn't roll into a movie.
– Pieter Geerkens
Aug 19 at 17:36










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
16
down vote



accepted










SHORT ANSWER



The reason why the Soviet Union backed down over Iran is still the subject of debate, but there does not appear to be any evidence that he threatened a nuclear strike. Nor would Stalin have needed reminding of American nuclear capability.



There was, though, considerable diplomatic pressure from the US both inside and outside the UN. It is also worth noting that the Soviet withdrawal came a month after they had concluded negotiations with the Iranian government on terms highly favourable to the former.



DETAILS



The US's opposition to the Soviet presence in Iran was made very clear on several occasions, from Secretary of State James F. Byrnes' Feb. 28th speech (which Truman saw in advance) to official protests both to the Soviets and at the United Nations. On the Soviet decision to leave Iran, Robert H. Ferrel in Harry S. Truman and the Cold War Revisionist says:




What prompted them to get out was unclear....Adam Ulam advanced the
piquant theory that the Russians scampered out of Iran because
Churchill had just accused them of imperialism and they did not want
to provide an obvious proof... Truman, in a press conference in 1952,
told of a presidential ultimatum to the Russians and repeated this
account in his memoirs as well as in a book entitled Truman Speaks,
published in 1960, and in a conversation with Herbert Druks in 1962. A
volume of Foreign Relations contained an editorial note to the
effect that records in the State Department and in the Department of
Defense contained absolutely no indication of an ultimatum and that
several former high officers of the State Department who were queried
about this issue had no memory of one.




Truman's statement in 1952 was:




In 1945 I had to send an ultimatum to the head of the Soviet Union to
get out of Iran. They got out because we were in a position to meet a
situation of that kind.




On this 1952 statement, a White House spokesman later the same day clarified that




the President was using the term ultimatum in a non-technical layman
sense...the President was referring to the United States leadership in
the United Nations...and through diplomatic channels, in the Spring of
1946, which was the major factor in bringing about Soviet withdrawal
from Iran.




Truman's claims of an ultimatum in 1945 would mean it came before the report "Dialectical Materialism And Russian Objectives" of January 1946, his statement to Secretary of State Byrnes "I'm tired of babying the Soviets" in the same month, and the Kennan telegram in February which criticized the previous President's "friendliness and cooperation with Soviet leader Joseph Stalin". Threats of force usually follow diplomatic pressure, not precede it.



Further confusion about what message Truman did or did not convey to the Soviets resulted from Truman "furnishing various accounts" due to his "fading memory in later years", according to this jstor article. Although Truman (on the evening of March 4th) ordered the USS Missouri (heading for Turkey) to be accompanied by a naval task force as a show of force, this task force was not actually assembled until August; the Soviets were out of Iran in May, a move which came shortly after the (for them) successful conclusion of negotiations (on April 4th) in which the Iranian government conceded oil rights favourable to the Soviets.



Truman's statement in his 1960 book Truman Speaks was:




When Stalin refused to move out of Iran at the time agreed, I sent him
word I would move the fleet as far as the Persian Gulf. He got out.




Actually, the fleet was sent to the Turkish straits as Turkey was also under pressure from the Soviets. Even if Truman did say this to Stalin (and there is no supporting evidence for this), there is no mention of the involvement of nuclear weapons.



Whether or not Truman issued an ultimatum, the Soviets were under enormous diplomatic pressure to get out of Iran, having heavily lost two United Nations votes. Also, Stalin was not blind to the damage to Soviet interests a continued violation of the 1942 Tripartite Treaty and the UN charter would do.




Other sources:



E. Edwards Spalding, The First Cold Warrior: Harry Truman, Containment, and the Remaking of Liberal Internationalism



David Holloway, Nuclear weapons and the escalation of the Cold War, 1945–1962



Zulkanain Abdul Rahman, Amer Saifude Ghazali, Rosmadi Fauzi and Norazlan Hadi Yaacob, Britain, the United Nations and the Iranian Crisis of 1946






share|improve this answer






















    Your Answer







    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "324"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhistory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f47675%2fdid-truman-threaten-a-nuclear-strike-if-the-soviet-union-didnt-withdraw-from-ir%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    16
    down vote



    accepted










    SHORT ANSWER



    The reason why the Soviet Union backed down over Iran is still the subject of debate, but there does not appear to be any evidence that he threatened a nuclear strike. Nor would Stalin have needed reminding of American nuclear capability.



    There was, though, considerable diplomatic pressure from the US both inside and outside the UN. It is also worth noting that the Soviet withdrawal came a month after they had concluded negotiations with the Iranian government on terms highly favourable to the former.



    DETAILS



    The US's opposition to the Soviet presence in Iran was made very clear on several occasions, from Secretary of State James F. Byrnes' Feb. 28th speech (which Truman saw in advance) to official protests both to the Soviets and at the United Nations. On the Soviet decision to leave Iran, Robert H. Ferrel in Harry S. Truman and the Cold War Revisionist says:




    What prompted them to get out was unclear....Adam Ulam advanced the
    piquant theory that the Russians scampered out of Iran because
    Churchill had just accused them of imperialism and they did not want
    to provide an obvious proof... Truman, in a press conference in 1952,
    told of a presidential ultimatum to the Russians and repeated this
    account in his memoirs as well as in a book entitled Truman Speaks,
    published in 1960, and in a conversation with Herbert Druks in 1962. A
    volume of Foreign Relations contained an editorial note to the
    effect that records in the State Department and in the Department of
    Defense contained absolutely no indication of an ultimatum and that
    several former high officers of the State Department who were queried
    about this issue had no memory of one.




    Truman's statement in 1952 was:




    In 1945 I had to send an ultimatum to the head of the Soviet Union to
    get out of Iran. They got out because we were in a position to meet a
    situation of that kind.




    On this 1952 statement, a White House spokesman later the same day clarified that




    the President was using the term ultimatum in a non-technical layman
    sense...the President was referring to the United States leadership in
    the United Nations...and through diplomatic channels, in the Spring of
    1946, which was the major factor in bringing about Soviet withdrawal
    from Iran.




    Truman's claims of an ultimatum in 1945 would mean it came before the report "Dialectical Materialism And Russian Objectives" of January 1946, his statement to Secretary of State Byrnes "I'm tired of babying the Soviets" in the same month, and the Kennan telegram in February which criticized the previous President's "friendliness and cooperation with Soviet leader Joseph Stalin". Threats of force usually follow diplomatic pressure, not precede it.



    Further confusion about what message Truman did or did not convey to the Soviets resulted from Truman "furnishing various accounts" due to his "fading memory in later years", according to this jstor article. Although Truman (on the evening of March 4th) ordered the USS Missouri (heading for Turkey) to be accompanied by a naval task force as a show of force, this task force was not actually assembled until August; the Soviets were out of Iran in May, a move which came shortly after the (for them) successful conclusion of negotiations (on April 4th) in which the Iranian government conceded oil rights favourable to the Soviets.



    Truman's statement in his 1960 book Truman Speaks was:




    When Stalin refused to move out of Iran at the time agreed, I sent him
    word I would move the fleet as far as the Persian Gulf. He got out.




    Actually, the fleet was sent to the Turkish straits as Turkey was also under pressure from the Soviets. Even if Truman did say this to Stalin (and there is no supporting evidence for this), there is no mention of the involvement of nuclear weapons.



    Whether or not Truman issued an ultimatum, the Soviets were under enormous diplomatic pressure to get out of Iran, having heavily lost two United Nations votes. Also, Stalin was not blind to the damage to Soviet interests a continued violation of the 1942 Tripartite Treaty and the UN charter would do.




    Other sources:



    E. Edwards Spalding, The First Cold Warrior: Harry Truman, Containment, and the Remaking of Liberal Internationalism



    David Holloway, Nuclear weapons and the escalation of the Cold War, 1945–1962



    Zulkanain Abdul Rahman, Amer Saifude Ghazali, Rosmadi Fauzi and Norazlan Hadi Yaacob, Britain, the United Nations and the Iranian Crisis of 1946






    share|improve this answer


























      up vote
      16
      down vote



      accepted










      SHORT ANSWER



      The reason why the Soviet Union backed down over Iran is still the subject of debate, but there does not appear to be any evidence that he threatened a nuclear strike. Nor would Stalin have needed reminding of American nuclear capability.



      There was, though, considerable diplomatic pressure from the US both inside and outside the UN. It is also worth noting that the Soviet withdrawal came a month after they had concluded negotiations with the Iranian government on terms highly favourable to the former.



      DETAILS



      The US's opposition to the Soviet presence in Iran was made very clear on several occasions, from Secretary of State James F. Byrnes' Feb. 28th speech (which Truman saw in advance) to official protests both to the Soviets and at the United Nations. On the Soviet decision to leave Iran, Robert H. Ferrel in Harry S. Truman and the Cold War Revisionist says:




      What prompted them to get out was unclear....Adam Ulam advanced the
      piquant theory that the Russians scampered out of Iran because
      Churchill had just accused them of imperialism and they did not want
      to provide an obvious proof... Truman, in a press conference in 1952,
      told of a presidential ultimatum to the Russians and repeated this
      account in his memoirs as well as in a book entitled Truman Speaks,
      published in 1960, and in a conversation with Herbert Druks in 1962. A
      volume of Foreign Relations contained an editorial note to the
      effect that records in the State Department and in the Department of
      Defense contained absolutely no indication of an ultimatum and that
      several former high officers of the State Department who were queried
      about this issue had no memory of one.




      Truman's statement in 1952 was:




      In 1945 I had to send an ultimatum to the head of the Soviet Union to
      get out of Iran. They got out because we were in a position to meet a
      situation of that kind.




      On this 1952 statement, a White House spokesman later the same day clarified that




      the President was using the term ultimatum in a non-technical layman
      sense...the President was referring to the United States leadership in
      the United Nations...and through diplomatic channels, in the Spring of
      1946, which was the major factor in bringing about Soviet withdrawal
      from Iran.




      Truman's claims of an ultimatum in 1945 would mean it came before the report "Dialectical Materialism And Russian Objectives" of January 1946, his statement to Secretary of State Byrnes "I'm tired of babying the Soviets" in the same month, and the Kennan telegram in February which criticized the previous President's "friendliness and cooperation with Soviet leader Joseph Stalin". Threats of force usually follow diplomatic pressure, not precede it.



      Further confusion about what message Truman did or did not convey to the Soviets resulted from Truman "furnishing various accounts" due to his "fading memory in later years", according to this jstor article. Although Truman (on the evening of March 4th) ordered the USS Missouri (heading for Turkey) to be accompanied by a naval task force as a show of force, this task force was not actually assembled until August; the Soviets were out of Iran in May, a move which came shortly after the (for them) successful conclusion of negotiations (on April 4th) in which the Iranian government conceded oil rights favourable to the Soviets.



      Truman's statement in his 1960 book Truman Speaks was:




      When Stalin refused to move out of Iran at the time agreed, I sent him
      word I would move the fleet as far as the Persian Gulf. He got out.




      Actually, the fleet was sent to the Turkish straits as Turkey was also under pressure from the Soviets. Even if Truman did say this to Stalin (and there is no supporting evidence for this), there is no mention of the involvement of nuclear weapons.



      Whether or not Truman issued an ultimatum, the Soviets were under enormous diplomatic pressure to get out of Iran, having heavily lost two United Nations votes. Also, Stalin was not blind to the damage to Soviet interests a continued violation of the 1942 Tripartite Treaty and the UN charter would do.




      Other sources:



      E. Edwards Spalding, The First Cold Warrior: Harry Truman, Containment, and the Remaking of Liberal Internationalism



      David Holloway, Nuclear weapons and the escalation of the Cold War, 1945–1962



      Zulkanain Abdul Rahman, Amer Saifude Ghazali, Rosmadi Fauzi and Norazlan Hadi Yaacob, Britain, the United Nations and the Iranian Crisis of 1946






      share|improve this answer
























        up vote
        16
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        16
        down vote



        accepted






        SHORT ANSWER



        The reason why the Soviet Union backed down over Iran is still the subject of debate, but there does not appear to be any evidence that he threatened a nuclear strike. Nor would Stalin have needed reminding of American nuclear capability.



        There was, though, considerable diplomatic pressure from the US both inside and outside the UN. It is also worth noting that the Soviet withdrawal came a month after they had concluded negotiations with the Iranian government on terms highly favourable to the former.



        DETAILS



        The US's opposition to the Soviet presence in Iran was made very clear on several occasions, from Secretary of State James F. Byrnes' Feb. 28th speech (which Truman saw in advance) to official protests both to the Soviets and at the United Nations. On the Soviet decision to leave Iran, Robert H. Ferrel in Harry S. Truman and the Cold War Revisionist says:




        What prompted them to get out was unclear....Adam Ulam advanced the
        piquant theory that the Russians scampered out of Iran because
        Churchill had just accused them of imperialism and they did not want
        to provide an obvious proof... Truman, in a press conference in 1952,
        told of a presidential ultimatum to the Russians and repeated this
        account in his memoirs as well as in a book entitled Truman Speaks,
        published in 1960, and in a conversation with Herbert Druks in 1962. A
        volume of Foreign Relations contained an editorial note to the
        effect that records in the State Department and in the Department of
        Defense contained absolutely no indication of an ultimatum and that
        several former high officers of the State Department who were queried
        about this issue had no memory of one.




        Truman's statement in 1952 was:




        In 1945 I had to send an ultimatum to the head of the Soviet Union to
        get out of Iran. They got out because we were in a position to meet a
        situation of that kind.




        On this 1952 statement, a White House spokesman later the same day clarified that




        the President was using the term ultimatum in a non-technical layman
        sense...the President was referring to the United States leadership in
        the United Nations...and through diplomatic channels, in the Spring of
        1946, which was the major factor in bringing about Soviet withdrawal
        from Iran.




        Truman's claims of an ultimatum in 1945 would mean it came before the report "Dialectical Materialism And Russian Objectives" of January 1946, his statement to Secretary of State Byrnes "I'm tired of babying the Soviets" in the same month, and the Kennan telegram in February which criticized the previous President's "friendliness and cooperation with Soviet leader Joseph Stalin". Threats of force usually follow diplomatic pressure, not precede it.



        Further confusion about what message Truman did or did not convey to the Soviets resulted from Truman "furnishing various accounts" due to his "fading memory in later years", according to this jstor article. Although Truman (on the evening of March 4th) ordered the USS Missouri (heading for Turkey) to be accompanied by a naval task force as a show of force, this task force was not actually assembled until August; the Soviets were out of Iran in May, a move which came shortly after the (for them) successful conclusion of negotiations (on April 4th) in which the Iranian government conceded oil rights favourable to the Soviets.



        Truman's statement in his 1960 book Truman Speaks was:




        When Stalin refused to move out of Iran at the time agreed, I sent him
        word I would move the fleet as far as the Persian Gulf. He got out.




        Actually, the fleet was sent to the Turkish straits as Turkey was also under pressure from the Soviets. Even if Truman did say this to Stalin (and there is no supporting evidence for this), there is no mention of the involvement of nuclear weapons.



        Whether or not Truman issued an ultimatum, the Soviets were under enormous diplomatic pressure to get out of Iran, having heavily lost two United Nations votes. Also, Stalin was not blind to the damage to Soviet interests a continued violation of the 1942 Tripartite Treaty and the UN charter would do.




        Other sources:



        E. Edwards Spalding, The First Cold Warrior: Harry Truman, Containment, and the Remaking of Liberal Internationalism



        David Holloway, Nuclear weapons and the escalation of the Cold War, 1945–1962



        Zulkanain Abdul Rahman, Amer Saifude Ghazali, Rosmadi Fauzi and Norazlan Hadi Yaacob, Britain, the United Nations and the Iranian Crisis of 1946






        share|improve this answer














        SHORT ANSWER



        The reason why the Soviet Union backed down over Iran is still the subject of debate, but there does not appear to be any evidence that he threatened a nuclear strike. Nor would Stalin have needed reminding of American nuclear capability.



        There was, though, considerable diplomatic pressure from the US both inside and outside the UN. It is also worth noting that the Soviet withdrawal came a month after they had concluded negotiations with the Iranian government on terms highly favourable to the former.



        DETAILS



        The US's opposition to the Soviet presence in Iran was made very clear on several occasions, from Secretary of State James F. Byrnes' Feb. 28th speech (which Truman saw in advance) to official protests both to the Soviets and at the United Nations. On the Soviet decision to leave Iran, Robert H. Ferrel in Harry S. Truman and the Cold War Revisionist says:




        What prompted them to get out was unclear....Adam Ulam advanced the
        piquant theory that the Russians scampered out of Iran because
        Churchill had just accused them of imperialism and they did not want
        to provide an obvious proof... Truman, in a press conference in 1952,
        told of a presidential ultimatum to the Russians and repeated this
        account in his memoirs as well as in a book entitled Truman Speaks,
        published in 1960, and in a conversation with Herbert Druks in 1962. A
        volume of Foreign Relations contained an editorial note to the
        effect that records in the State Department and in the Department of
        Defense contained absolutely no indication of an ultimatum and that
        several former high officers of the State Department who were queried
        about this issue had no memory of one.




        Truman's statement in 1952 was:




        In 1945 I had to send an ultimatum to the head of the Soviet Union to
        get out of Iran. They got out because we were in a position to meet a
        situation of that kind.




        On this 1952 statement, a White House spokesman later the same day clarified that




        the President was using the term ultimatum in a non-technical layman
        sense...the President was referring to the United States leadership in
        the United Nations...and through diplomatic channels, in the Spring of
        1946, which was the major factor in bringing about Soviet withdrawal
        from Iran.




        Truman's claims of an ultimatum in 1945 would mean it came before the report "Dialectical Materialism And Russian Objectives" of January 1946, his statement to Secretary of State Byrnes "I'm tired of babying the Soviets" in the same month, and the Kennan telegram in February which criticized the previous President's "friendliness and cooperation with Soviet leader Joseph Stalin". Threats of force usually follow diplomatic pressure, not precede it.



        Further confusion about what message Truman did or did not convey to the Soviets resulted from Truman "furnishing various accounts" due to his "fading memory in later years", according to this jstor article. Although Truman (on the evening of March 4th) ordered the USS Missouri (heading for Turkey) to be accompanied by a naval task force as a show of force, this task force was not actually assembled until August; the Soviets were out of Iran in May, a move which came shortly after the (for them) successful conclusion of negotiations (on April 4th) in which the Iranian government conceded oil rights favourable to the Soviets.



        Truman's statement in his 1960 book Truman Speaks was:




        When Stalin refused to move out of Iran at the time agreed, I sent him
        word I would move the fleet as far as the Persian Gulf. He got out.




        Actually, the fleet was sent to the Turkish straits as Turkey was also under pressure from the Soviets. Even if Truman did say this to Stalin (and there is no supporting evidence for this), there is no mention of the involvement of nuclear weapons.



        Whether or not Truman issued an ultimatum, the Soviets were under enormous diplomatic pressure to get out of Iran, having heavily lost two United Nations votes. Also, Stalin was not blind to the damage to Soviet interests a continued violation of the 1942 Tripartite Treaty and the UN charter would do.




        Other sources:



        E. Edwards Spalding, The First Cold Warrior: Harry Truman, Containment, and the Remaking of Liberal Internationalism



        David Holloway, Nuclear weapons and the escalation of the Cold War, 1945–1962



        Zulkanain Abdul Rahman, Amer Saifude Ghazali, Rosmadi Fauzi and Norazlan Hadi Yaacob, Britain, the United Nations and the Iranian Crisis of 1946







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Aug 21 at 11:29

























        answered Aug 19 at 14:36









        Lars Bosteen

        28.9k7145199




        28.9k7145199



























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhistory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f47675%2fdid-truman-threaten-a-nuclear-strike-if-the-soviet-union-didnt-withdraw-from-ir%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            Popular posts from this blog

            How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

            Bahrain

            Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay