Why might Google Analytics report a sudden, but persistent, drop in bounce rate (70% to 12%)

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












9















I was tracking data for a site and realize that there is a sudden drop in bounce rate in Google Analytics. The sudden drop happened across 2 days and remained consistent after.



The bounce rate in January 2019 is about 70% whereas after 2 days, it became 12-15%. I am unaware of what my colleague did so I am trying to figure it out now.



Is a bounce rate of 12% normal?



enter image description here










share|improve this question




























    9















    I was tracking data for a site and realize that there is a sudden drop in bounce rate in Google Analytics. The sudden drop happened across 2 days and remained consistent after.



    The bounce rate in January 2019 is about 70% whereas after 2 days, it became 12-15%. I am unaware of what my colleague did so I am trying to figure it out now.



    Is a bounce rate of 12% normal?



    enter image description here










    share|improve this question


























      9












      9








      9


      1






      I was tracking data for a site and realize that there is a sudden drop in bounce rate in Google Analytics. The sudden drop happened across 2 days and remained consistent after.



      The bounce rate in January 2019 is about 70% whereas after 2 days, it became 12-15%. I am unaware of what my colleague did so I am trying to figure it out now.



      Is a bounce rate of 12% normal?



      enter image description here










      share|improve this question
















      I was tracking data for a site and realize that there is a sudden drop in bounce rate in Google Analytics. The sudden drop happened across 2 days and remained consistent after.



      The bounce rate in January 2019 is about 70% whereas after 2 days, it became 12-15%. I am unaware of what my colleague did so I am trying to figure it out now.



      Is a bounce rate of 12% normal?



      enter image description here







      google-analytics bounce-rate






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Mar 4 at 19:09









      Stephen Ostermiller

      69.5k1395253




      69.5k1395253










      asked Mar 4 at 8:45









      J. ShiJ. Shi

      465




      465




















          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          15














          I'd be willing to bet that your colleague implemented on-page events.



          By default Google Anaytics only measures page views. Bounces are defined as users who only view one page; even if that user spends hours on one page.



          Events allow you to track what happens within the page. You can send GA information about items such as:



          • User clicking on buttons

          • User scrolling the page

          • User spending X minutes on the page

          • User typing on the page

          • User watching a video on the page

          • Additional AJAX content gets loaded

          All of those events can be marked as "interactive" which causes GA to say "this user did not bounce." They also could be marked as "non-interactive" which does not affect the bounce rate.



          If I'm right, you will see data in the "Behavior" -> "Events" -> "Overview" report starting right when your bounce rate went way down.



          A 12% bounce rate when events are implemented is quite normal. It is also very normal for some types of sites to have a 75% bounce rate before events:



          • Single page applications (SPAs) only have multiple page views if users refresh or click to the site a second time.

          • Many sites provide all the information that most users need right in the landing page. That is common for articles and calculators. I feel that it shouldn't be a "bounce" if the user reads the entire article.

          Events are the way to let GA know that you are satisfying your users even when they are only viewing one page.



          You may want to review the events that are being sent and make sure that each is being marked as "interactive" or "non-interactive" appropriately.






          share|improve this answer




















          • 2





            Well this is a real eye-opener. You would think that a person landing on the exact page they needed from a Google result would be calculated more favorably. By adding these events does it also improve the SEO algorithm by showing Google that your user did not "bounce" per the redefined definition?

            – MonkeyZeus
            Mar 4 at 18:15







          • 3





            Google Analytics statistics have no direct impact on SEO. Improving your bounce rate by implementing events doesn't change user behavior and can't affect your rankings. For ranking purposes, Google cares that users are satisfied. Rankings could get worse if lots of users head back to the search results after visiting your site and click on another site instead. For a detailed explanation of why, see my answer to "Does a site's bounce rate influence Google rankings?"

            – Stephen Ostermiller
            Mar 4 at 18:25












          • This is a new area for me. Thank you. After a quick bit of reading it appears that Google Tag Manager is loaded Asynchronously. Still, is there a performance hit on pages using GTM?

            – Trebor
            Mar 5 at 15:38











          • You don't need to use Google tag manager for events. It can be done that way, but I've never used it for that purpose. I've always implemented events with JavaScript loaded in the normal js way.

            – Stephen Ostermiller
            Mar 5 at 17:52



















          2














          The bounce rate, generally becomes low when any of the following changes are done:



          1. Better Landing Page Experience

          2. Content served to the user is highly valuable compared to others

          3. No changes on-page are made but traffic from a low quality source, stopped coming.

          To understand why, check the following with your Analytics and colleague:



          • Any changes to landing page/content?

          • Any changes to the sources of visitors to your webpages?


          Is a bounce rate of 12% is not normal?




          This totally depends on your website category and traffic sources. For my website, I'm maintaining less than your 12% bounce rate, which not a lot of people could achieve. (The % is not relevant as it also has to be accounted with the no. of users that visit the webpage in a particular period.)






          share|improve this answer






























            1














            Is that an average bounce rate over different pages/sources?



            Usually if it drops to zero it is due to double pageview events firing but since you are showing a consistent 12% I imagine that the tracking issue is only affecting some pages.



            I like to use Tag Assistant Chrome add-on for debugging






            share|improve this answer






























              1














              Those all are good things, and of course all of us want data to look like that, no doubt :) , but do not forget that there is "other" side of medal. This can be result based on intercepted script/wrongly setup or double tracking, if someone accidentally implemented code twice, or if you have Both GTM and GA scripts on website code. Check those as well. I hope i am wrong but...






              share|improve this answer























              • I would expect the bounce rate to be lower (almost zero) if GA is being called twice. If that were true there should also be a corresponding big jump in the page views. Certainly worth checking.

                – Stephen Ostermiller
                Mar 5 at 13:57







              • 1





                IF it is GTM over GA, not quite, i know odd thing, but that actually happened, bounce rate dropped on 5,6% avg.

                – Filozof666
                Mar 6 at 6:18











              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "45"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwebmasters.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f121360%2fwhy-might-google-analytics-report-a-sudden-but-persistent-drop-in-bounce-rate%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              4 Answers
              4






              active

              oldest

              votes








              4 Answers
              4






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              15














              I'd be willing to bet that your colleague implemented on-page events.



              By default Google Anaytics only measures page views. Bounces are defined as users who only view one page; even if that user spends hours on one page.



              Events allow you to track what happens within the page. You can send GA information about items such as:



              • User clicking on buttons

              • User scrolling the page

              • User spending X minutes on the page

              • User typing on the page

              • User watching a video on the page

              • Additional AJAX content gets loaded

              All of those events can be marked as "interactive" which causes GA to say "this user did not bounce." They also could be marked as "non-interactive" which does not affect the bounce rate.



              If I'm right, you will see data in the "Behavior" -> "Events" -> "Overview" report starting right when your bounce rate went way down.



              A 12% bounce rate when events are implemented is quite normal. It is also very normal for some types of sites to have a 75% bounce rate before events:



              • Single page applications (SPAs) only have multiple page views if users refresh or click to the site a second time.

              • Many sites provide all the information that most users need right in the landing page. That is common for articles and calculators. I feel that it shouldn't be a "bounce" if the user reads the entire article.

              Events are the way to let GA know that you are satisfying your users even when they are only viewing one page.



              You may want to review the events that are being sent and make sure that each is being marked as "interactive" or "non-interactive" appropriately.






              share|improve this answer




















              • 2





                Well this is a real eye-opener. You would think that a person landing on the exact page they needed from a Google result would be calculated more favorably. By adding these events does it also improve the SEO algorithm by showing Google that your user did not "bounce" per the redefined definition?

                – MonkeyZeus
                Mar 4 at 18:15







              • 3





                Google Analytics statistics have no direct impact on SEO. Improving your bounce rate by implementing events doesn't change user behavior and can't affect your rankings. For ranking purposes, Google cares that users are satisfied. Rankings could get worse if lots of users head back to the search results after visiting your site and click on another site instead. For a detailed explanation of why, see my answer to "Does a site's bounce rate influence Google rankings?"

                – Stephen Ostermiller
                Mar 4 at 18:25












              • This is a new area for me. Thank you. After a quick bit of reading it appears that Google Tag Manager is loaded Asynchronously. Still, is there a performance hit on pages using GTM?

                – Trebor
                Mar 5 at 15:38











              • You don't need to use Google tag manager for events. It can be done that way, but I've never used it for that purpose. I've always implemented events with JavaScript loaded in the normal js way.

                – Stephen Ostermiller
                Mar 5 at 17:52
















              15














              I'd be willing to bet that your colleague implemented on-page events.



              By default Google Anaytics only measures page views. Bounces are defined as users who only view one page; even if that user spends hours on one page.



              Events allow you to track what happens within the page. You can send GA information about items such as:



              • User clicking on buttons

              • User scrolling the page

              • User spending X minutes on the page

              • User typing on the page

              • User watching a video on the page

              • Additional AJAX content gets loaded

              All of those events can be marked as "interactive" which causes GA to say "this user did not bounce." They also could be marked as "non-interactive" which does not affect the bounce rate.



              If I'm right, you will see data in the "Behavior" -> "Events" -> "Overview" report starting right when your bounce rate went way down.



              A 12% bounce rate when events are implemented is quite normal. It is also very normal for some types of sites to have a 75% bounce rate before events:



              • Single page applications (SPAs) only have multiple page views if users refresh or click to the site a second time.

              • Many sites provide all the information that most users need right in the landing page. That is common for articles and calculators. I feel that it shouldn't be a "bounce" if the user reads the entire article.

              Events are the way to let GA know that you are satisfying your users even when they are only viewing one page.



              You may want to review the events that are being sent and make sure that each is being marked as "interactive" or "non-interactive" appropriately.






              share|improve this answer




















              • 2





                Well this is a real eye-opener. You would think that a person landing on the exact page they needed from a Google result would be calculated more favorably. By adding these events does it also improve the SEO algorithm by showing Google that your user did not "bounce" per the redefined definition?

                – MonkeyZeus
                Mar 4 at 18:15







              • 3





                Google Analytics statistics have no direct impact on SEO. Improving your bounce rate by implementing events doesn't change user behavior and can't affect your rankings. For ranking purposes, Google cares that users are satisfied. Rankings could get worse if lots of users head back to the search results after visiting your site and click on another site instead. For a detailed explanation of why, see my answer to "Does a site's bounce rate influence Google rankings?"

                – Stephen Ostermiller
                Mar 4 at 18:25












              • This is a new area for me. Thank you. After a quick bit of reading it appears that Google Tag Manager is loaded Asynchronously. Still, is there a performance hit on pages using GTM?

                – Trebor
                Mar 5 at 15:38











              • You don't need to use Google tag manager for events. It can be done that way, but I've never used it for that purpose. I've always implemented events with JavaScript loaded in the normal js way.

                – Stephen Ostermiller
                Mar 5 at 17:52














              15












              15








              15







              I'd be willing to bet that your colleague implemented on-page events.



              By default Google Anaytics only measures page views. Bounces are defined as users who only view one page; even if that user spends hours on one page.



              Events allow you to track what happens within the page. You can send GA information about items such as:



              • User clicking on buttons

              • User scrolling the page

              • User spending X minutes on the page

              • User typing on the page

              • User watching a video on the page

              • Additional AJAX content gets loaded

              All of those events can be marked as "interactive" which causes GA to say "this user did not bounce." They also could be marked as "non-interactive" which does not affect the bounce rate.



              If I'm right, you will see data in the "Behavior" -> "Events" -> "Overview" report starting right when your bounce rate went way down.



              A 12% bounce rate when events are implemented is quite normal. It is also very normal for some types of sites to have a 75% bounce rate before events:



              • Single page applications (SPAs) only have multiple page views if users refresh or click to the site a second time.

              • Many sites provide all the information that most users need right in the landing page. That is common for articles and calculators. I feel that it shouldn't be a "bounce" if the user reads the entire article.

              Events are the way to let GA know that you are satisfying your users even when they are only viewing one page.



              You may want to review the events that are being sent and make sure that each is being marked as "interactive" or "non-interactive" appropriately.






              share|improve this answer















              I'd be willing to bet that your colleague implemented on-page events.



              By default Google Anaytics only measures page views. Bounces are defined as users who only view one page; even if that user spends hours on one page.



              Events allow you to track what happens within the page. You can send GA information about items such as:



              • User clicking on buttons

              • User scrolling the page

              • User spending X minutes on the page

              • User typing on the page

              • User watching a video on the page

              • Additional AJAX content gets loaded

              All of those events can be marked as "interactive" which causes GA to say "this user did not bounce." They also could be marked as "non-interactive" which does not affect the bounce rate.



              If I'm right, you will see data in the "Behavior" -> "Events" -> "Overview" report starting right when your bounce rate went way down.



              A 12% bounce rate when events are implemented is quite normal. It is also very normal for some types of sites to have a 75% bounce rate before events:



              • Single page applications (SPAs) only have multiple page views if users refresh or click to the site a second time.

              • Many sites provide all the information that most users need right in the landing page. That is common for articles and calculators. I feel that it shouldn't be a "bounce" if the user reads the entire article.

              Events are the way to let GA know that you are satisfying your users even when they are only viewing one page.



              You may want to review the events that are being sent and make sure that each is being marked as "interactive" or "non-interactive" appropriately.







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited Mar 4 at 18:28

























              answered Mar 4 at 11:03









              Stephen OstermillerStephen Ostermiller

              69.5k1395253




              69.5k1395253







              • 2





                Well this is a real eye-opener. You would think that a person landing on the exact page they needed from a Google result would be calculated more favorably. By adding these events does it also improve the SEO algorithm by showing Google that your user did not "bounce" per the redefined definition?

                – MonkeyZeus
                Mar 4 at 18:15







              • 3





                Google Analytics statistics have no direct impact on SEO. Improving your bounce rate by implementing events doesn't change user behavior and can't affect your rankings. For ranking purposes, Google cares that users are satisfied. Rankings could get worse if lots of users head back to the search results after visiting your site and click on another site instead. For a detailed explanation of why, see my answer to "Does a site's bounce rate influence Google rankings?"

                – Stephen Ostermiller
                Mar 4 at 18:25












              • This is a new area for me. Thank you. After a quick bit of reading it appears that Google Tag Manager is loaded Asynchronously. Still, is there a performance hit on pages using GTM?

                – Trebor
                Mar 5 at 15:38











              • You don't need to use Google tag manager for events. It can be done that way, but I've never used it for that purpose. I've always implemented events with JavaScript loaded in the normal js way.

                – Stephen Ostermiller
                Mar 5 at 17:52













              • 2





                Well this is a real eye-opener. You would think that a person landing on the exact page they needed from a Google result would be calculated more favorably. By adding these events does it also improve the SEO algorithm by showing Google that your user did not "bounce" per the redefined definition?

                – MonkeyZeus
                Mar 4 at 18:15







              • 3





                Google Analytics statistics have no direct impact on SEO. Improving your bounce rate by implementing events doesn't change user behavior and can't affect your rankings. For ranking purposes, Google cares that users are satisfied. Rankings could get worse if lots of users head back to the search results after visiting your site and click on another site instead. For a detailed explanation of why, see my answer to "Does a site's bounce rate influence Google rankings?"

                – Stephen Ostermiller
                Mar 4 at 18:25












              • This is a new area for me. Thank you. After a quick bit of reading it appears that Google Tag Manager is loaded Asynchronously. Still, is there a performance hit on pages using GTM?

                – Trebor
                Mar 5 at 15:38











              • You don't need to use Google tag manager for events. It can be done that way, but I've never used it for that purpose. I've always implemented events with JavaScript loaded in the normal js way.

                – Stephen Ostermiller
                Mar 5 at 17:52








              2




              2





              Well this is a real eye-opener. You would think that a person landing on the exact page they needed from a Google result would be calculated more favorably. By adding these events does it also improve the SEO algorithm by showing Google that your user did not "bounce" per the redefined definition?

              – MonkeyZeus
              Mar 4 at 18:15






              Well this is a real eye-opener. You would think that a person landing on the exact page they needed from a Google result would be calculated more favorably. By adding these events does it also improve the SEO algorithm by showing Google that your user did not "bounce" per the redefined definition?

              – MonkeyZeus
              Mar 4 at 18:15





              3




              3





              Google Analytics statistics have no direct impact on SEO. Improving your bounce rate by implementing events doesn't change user behavior and can't affect your rankings. For ranking purposes, Google cares that users are satisfied. Rankings could get worse if lots of users head back to the search results after visiting your site and click on another site instead. For a detailed explanation of why, see my answer to "Does a site's bounce rate influence Google rankings?"

              – Stephen Ostermiller
              Mar 4 at 18:25






              Google Analytics statistics have no direct impact on SEO. Improving your bounce rate by implementing events doesn't change user behavior and can't affect your rankings. For ranking purposes, Google cares that users are satisfied. Rankings could get worse if lots of users head back to the search results after visiting your site and click on another site instead. For a detailed explanation of why, see my answer to "Does a site's bounce rate influence Google rankings?"

              – Stephen Ostermiller
              Mar 4 at 18:25














              This is a new area for me. Thank you. After a quick bit of reading it appears that Google Tag Manager is loaded Asynchronously. Still, is there a performance hit on pages using GTM?

              – Trebor
              Mar 5 at 15:38





              This is a new area for me. Thank you. After a quick bit of reading it appears that Google Tag Manager is loaded Asynchronously. Still, is there a performance hit on pages using GTM?

              – Trebor
              Mar 5 at 15:38













              You don't need to use Google tag manager for events. It can be done that way, but I've never used it for that purpose. I've always implemented events with JavaScript loaded in the normal js way.

              – Stephen Ostermiller
              Mar 5 at 17:52






              You don't need to use Google tag manager for events. It can be done that way, but I've never used it for that purpose. I've always implemented events with JavaScript loaded in the normal js way.

              – Stephen Ostermiller
              Mar 5 at 17:52














              2














              The bounce rate, generally becomes low when any of the following changes are done:



              1. Better Landing Page Experience

              2. Content served to the user is highly valuable compared to others

              3. No changes on-page are made but traffic from a low quality source, stopped coming.

              To understand why, check the following with your Analytics and colleague:



              • Any changes to landing page/content?

              • Any changes to the sources of visitors to your webpages?


              Is a bounce rate of 12% is not normal?




              This totally depends on your website category and traffic sources. For my website, I'm maintaining less than your 12% bounce rate, which not a lot of people could achieve. (The % is not relevant as it also has to be accounted with the no. of users that visit the webpage in a particular period.)






              share|improve this answer



























                2














                The bounce rate, generally becomes low when any of the following changes are done:



                1. Better Landing Page Experience

                2. Content served to the user is highly valuable compared to others

                3. No changes on-page are made but traffic from a low quality source, stopped coming.

                To understand why, check the following with your Analytics and colleague:



                • Any changes to landing page/content?

                • Any changes to the sources of visitors to your webpages?


                Is a bounce rate of 12% is not normal?




                This totally depends on your website category and traffic sources. For my website, I'm maintaining less than your 12% bounce rate, which not a lot of people could achieve. (The % is not relevant as it also has to be accounted with the no. of users that visit the webpage in a particular period.)






                share|improve this answer

























                  2












                  2








                  2







                  The bounce rate, generally becomes low when any of the following changes are done:



                  1. Better Landing Page Experience

                  2. Content served to the user is highly valuable compared to others

                  3. No changes on-page are made but traffic from a low quality source, stopped coming.

                  To understand why, check the following with your Analytics and colleague:



                  • Any changes to landing page/content?

                  • Any changes to the sources of visitors to your webpages?


                  Is a bounce rate of 12% is not normal?




                  This totally depends on your website category and traffic sources. For my website, I'm maintaining less than your 12% bounce rate, which not a lot of people could achieve. (The % is not relevant as it also has to be accounted with the no. of users that visit the webpage in a particular period.)






                  share|improve this answer













                  The bounce rate, generally becomes low when any of the following changes are done:



                  1. Better Landing Page Experience

                  2. Content served to the user is highly valuable compared to others

                  3. No changes on-page are made but traffic from a low quality source, stopped coming.

                  To understand why, check the following with your Analytics and colleague:



                  • Any changes to landing page/content?

                  • Any changes to the sources of visitors to your webpages?


                  Is a bounce rate of 12% is not normal?




                  This totally depends on your website category and traffic sources. For my website, I'm maintaining less than your 12% bounce rate, which not a lot of people could achieve. (The % is not relevant as it also has to be accounted with the no. of users that visit the webpage in a particular period.)







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Mar 4 at 9:27









                  idkidk

                  67812




                  67812





















                      1














                      Is that an average bounce rate over different pages/sources?



                      Usually if it drops to zero it is due to double pageview events firing but since you are showing a consistent 12% I imagine that the tracking issue is only affecting some pages.



                      I like to use Tag Assistant Chrome add-on for debugging






                      share|improve this answer



























                        1














                        Is that an average bounce rate over different pages/sources?



                        Usually if it drops to zero it is due to double pageview events firing but since you are showing a consistent 12% I imagine that the tracking issue is only affecting some pages.



                        I like to use Tag Assistant Chrome add-on for debugging






                        share|improve this answer

























                          1












                          1








                          1







                          Is that an average bounce rate over different pages/sources?



                          Usually if it drops to zero it is due to double pageview events firing but since you are showing a consistent 12% I imagine that the tracking issue is only affecting some pages.



                          I like to use Tag Assistant Chrome add-on for debugging






                          share|improve this answer













                          Is that an average bounce rate over different pages/sources?



                          Usually if it drops to zero it is due to double pageview events firing but since you are showing a consistent 12% I imagine that the tracking issue is only affecting some pages.



                          I like to use Tag Assistant Chrome add-on for debugging







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered Mar 4 at 16:12









                          Rob TRob T

                          563




                          563





















                              1














                              Those all are good things, and of course all of us want data to look like that, no doubt :) , but do not forget that there is "other" side of medal. This can be result based on intercepted script/wrongly setup or double tracking, if someone accidentally implemented code twice, or if you have Both GTM and GA scripts on website code. Check those as well. I hope i am wrong but...






                              share|improve this answer























                              • I would expect the bounce rate to be lower (almost zero) if GA is being called twice. If that were true there should also be a corresponding big jump in the page views. Certainly worth checking.

                                – Stephen Ostermiller
                                Mar 5 at 13:57







                              • 1





                                IF it is GTM over GA, not quite, i know odd thing, but that actually happened, bounce rate dropped on 5,6% avg.

                                – Filozof666
                                Mar 6 at 6:18















                              1














                              Those all are good things, and of course all of us want data to look like that, no doubt :) , but do not forget that there is "other" side of medal. This can be result based on intercepted script/wrongly setup or double tracking, if someone accidentally implemented code twice, or if you have Both GTM and GA scripts on website code. Check those as well. I hope i am wrong but...






                              share|improve this answer























                              • I would expect the bounce rate to be lower (almost zero) if GA is being called twice. If that were true there should also be a corresponding big jump in the page views. Certainly worth checking.

                                – Stephen Ostermiller
                                Mar 5 at 13:57







                              • 1





                                IF it is GTM over GA, not quite, i know odd thing, but that actually happened, bounce rate dropped on 5,6% avg.

                                – Filozof666
                                Mar 6 at 6:18













                              1












                              1








                              1







                              Those all are good things, and of course all of us want data to look like that, no doubt :) , but do not forget that there is "other" side of medal. This can be result based on intercepted script/wrongly setup or double tracking, if someone accidentally implemented code twice, or if you have Both GTM and GA scripts on website code. Check those as well. I hope i am wrong but...






                              share|improve this answer













                              Those all are good things, and of course all of us want data to look like that, no doubt :) , but do not forget that there is "other" side of medal. This can be result based on intercepted script/wrongly setup or double tracking, if someone accidentally implemented code twice, or if you have Both GTM and GA scripts on website code. Check those as well. I hope i am wrong but...







                              share|improve this answer












                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer










                              answered Mar 5 at 13:07









                              Filozof666Filozof666

                              1866




                              1866












                              • I would expect the bounce rate to be lower (almost zero) if GA is being called twice. If that were true there should also be a corresponding big jump in the page views. Certainly worth checking.

                                – Stephen Ostermiller
                                Mar 5 at 13:57







                              • 1





                                IF it is GTM over GA, not quite, i know odd thing, but that actually happened, bounce rate dropped on 5,6% avg.

                                – Filozof666
                                Mar 6 at 6:18

















                              • I would expect the bounce rate to be lower (almost zero) if GA is being called twice. If that were true there should also be a corresponding big jump in the page views. Certainly worth checking.

                                – Stephen Ostermiller
                                Mar 5 at 13:57







                              • 1





                                IF it is GTM over GA, not quite, i know odd thing, but that actually happened, bounce rate dropped on 5,6% avg.

                                – Filozof666
                                Mar 6 at 6:18
















                              I would expect the bounce rate to be lower (almost zero) if GA is being called twice. If that were true there should also be a corresponding big jump in the page views. Certainly worth checking.

                              – Stephen Ostermiller
                              Mar 5 at 13:57






                              I would expect the bounce rate to be lower (almost zero) if GA is being called twice. If that were true there should also be a corresponding big jump in the page views. Certainly worth checking.

                              – Stephen Ostermiller
                              Mar 5 at 13:57





                              1




                              1





                              IF it is GTM over GA, not quite, i know odd thing, but that actually happened, bounce rate dropped on 5,6% avg.

                              – Filozof666
                              Mar 6 at 6:18





                              IF it is GTM over GA, not quite, i know odd thing, but that actually happened, bounce rate dropped on 5,6% avg.

                              – Filozof666
                              Mar 6 at 6:18

















                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Webmasters Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwebmasters.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f121360%2fwhy-might-google-analytics-report-a-sudden-but-persistent-drop-in-bounce-rate%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown