What if I store 10TB on azure servers and then keep the vm powered off?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
I want to know should I pay for storage on azure even if I don't use it?
for example if I store 10TB on an azure VM and then keep that VM powered off, Will Microsoft charge me for that 10TB data? Or it just charges us for powered on VMs?
azure virtual-machines hard-drive storage
add a comment |
I want to know should I pay for storage on azure even if I don't use it?
for example if I store 10TB on an azure VM and then keep that VM powered off, Will Microsoft charge me for that 10TB data? Or it just charges us for powered on VMs?
azure virtual-machines hard-drive storage
1
If you just need some data stored, look at AWS S3, or whatever the matching Azure offering is. No server needed that way.
– Criggie
Mar 5 at 11:22
1
For storage only Backblaze and Wasabi might be a better options. They both are built around storage charges, rather than AWS / Azure who’re about compute primary.
– BaronSamedi1958
Mar 5 at 23:54
add a comment |
I want to know should I pay for storage on azure even if I don't use it?
for example if I store 10TB on an azure VM and then keep that VM powered off, Will Microsoft charge me for that 10TB data? Or it just charges us for powered on VMs?
azure virtual-machines hard-drive storage
I want to know should I pay for storage on azure even if I don't use it?
for example if I store 10TB on an azure VM and then keep that VM powered off, Will Microsoft charge me for that 10TB data? Or it just charges us for powered on VMs?
azure virtual-machines hard-drive storage
azure virtual-machines hard-drive storage
asked Mar 4 at 19:24
user1728307user1728307
2916
2916
1
If you just need some data stored, look at AWS S3, or whatever the matching Azure offering is. No server needed that way.
– Criggie
Mar 5 at 11:22
1
For storage only Backblaze and Wasabi might be a better options. They both are built around storage charges, rather than AWS / Azure who’re about compute primary.
– BaronSamedi1958
Mar 5 at 23:54
add a comment |
1
If you just need some data stored, look at AWS S3, or whatever the matching Azure offering is. No server needed that way.
– Criggie
Mar 5 at 11:22
1
For storage only Backblaze and Wasabi might be a better options. They both are built around storage charges, rather than AWS / Azure who’re about compute primary.
– BaronSamedi1958
Mar 5 at 23:54
1
1
If you just need some data stored, look at AWS S3, or whatever the matching Azure offering is. No server needed that way.
– Criggie
Mar 5 at 11:22
If you just need some data stored, look at AWS S3, or whatever the matching Azure offering is. No server needed that way.
– Criggie
Mar 5 at 11:22
1
1
For storage only Backblaze and Wasabi might be a better options. They both are built around storage charges, rather than AWS / Azure who’re about compute primary.
– BaronSamedi1958
Mar 5 at 23:54
For storage only Backblaze and Wasabi might be a better options. They both are built around storage charges, rather than AWS / Azure who’re about compute primary.
– BaronSamedi1958
Mar 5 at 23:54
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Yes, you’ll be charged for persistent storage. No, you won’t be charged for anything on a temp disk, but your data won’t survive a reboot. System disk written “extras” will be added to your “storage” bill.
11
Data on system disks will always survive a reboot; it's data on temporary disks that doesn't.
– Massimo
Mar 4 at 20:38
It's not cheap either, way more than gcloud, and more than AWS. It is still worth shutting down the VM's though. The level of granularity in the cost explorer leaves a lot to be desired too, but they are improving.
– mckenzm
Mar 5 at 1:51
add a comment |
Questions about products or services pricing are off topic here.
Anyway, yes, you will pay for used storage space even when no one is actively accessing it; the actual price depends on the type and size of the storage. More info here:
https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/details/storage/page-blobs/
add a comment |
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "2"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f956703%2fwhat-if-i-store-10tb-on-azure-servers-and-then-keep-the-vm-powered-off%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Yes, you’ll be charged for persistent storage. No, you won’t be charged for anything on a temp disk, but your data won’t survive a reboot. System disk written “extras” will be added to your “storage” bill.
11
Data on system disks will always survive a reboot; it's data on temporary disks that doesn't.
– Massimo
Mar 4 at 20:38
It's not cheap either, way more than gcloud, and more than AWS. It is still worth shutting down the VM's though. The level of granularity in the cost explorer leaves a lot to be desired too, but they are improving.
– mckenzm
Mar 5 at 1:51
add a comment |
Yes, you’ll be charged for persistent storage. No, you won’t be charged for anything on a temp disk, but your data won’t survive a reboot. System disk written “extras” will be added to your “storage” bill.
11
Data on system disks will always survive a reboot; it's data on temporary disks that doesn't.
– Massimo
Mar 4 at 20:38
It's not cheap either, way more than gcloud, and more than AWS. It is still worth shutting down the VM's though. The level of granularity in the cost explorer leaves a lot to be desired too, but they are improving.
– mckenzm
Mar 5 at 1:51
add a comment |
Yes, you’ll be charged for persistent storage. No, you won’t be charged for anything on a temp disk, but your data won’t survive a reboot. System disk written “extras” will be added to your “storage” bill.
Yes, you’ll be charged for persistent storage. No, you won’t be charged for anything on a temp disk, but your data won’t survive a reboot. System disk written “extras” will be added to your “storage” bill.
edited Mar 5 at 23:52
answered Mar 4 at 20:32
BaronSamedi1958BaronSamedi1958
7,44911128
7,44911128
11
Data on system disks will always survive a reboot; it's data on temporary disks that doesn't.
– Massimo
Mar 4 at 20:38
It's not cheap either, way more than gcloud, and more than AWS. It is still worth shutting down the VM's though. The level of granularity in the cost explorer leaves a lot to be desired too, but they are improving.
– mckenzm
Mar 5 at 1:51
add a comment |
11
Data on system disks will always survive a reboot; it's data on temporary disks that doesn't.
– Massimo
Mar 4 at 20:38
It's not cheap either, way more than gcloud, and more than AWS. It is still worth shutting down the VM's though. The level of granularity in the cost explorer leaves a lot to be desired too, but they are improving.
– mckenzm
Mar 5 at 1:51
11
11
Data on system disks will always survive a reboot; it's data on temporary disks that doesn't.
– Massimo
Mar 4 at 20:38
Data on system disks will always survive a reboot; it's data on temporary disks that doesn't.
– Massimo
Mar 4 at 20:38
It's not cheap either, way more than gcloud, and more than AWS. It is still worth shutting down the VM's though. The level of granularity in the cost explorer leaves a lot to be desired too, but they are improving.
– mckenzm
Mar 5 at 1:51
It's not cheap either, way more than gcloud, and more than AWS. It is still worth shutting down the VM's though. The level of granularity in the cost explorer leaves a lot to be desired too, but they are improving.
– mckenzm
Mar 5 at 1:51
add a comment |
Questions about products or services pricing are off topic here.
Anyway, yes, you will pay for used storage space even when no one is actively accessing it; the actual price depends on the type and size of the storage. More info here:
https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/details/storage/page-blobs/
add a comment |
Questions about products or services pricing are off topic here.
Anyway, yes, you will pay for used storage space even when no one is actively accessing it; the actual price depends on the type and size of the storage. More info here:
https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/details/storage/page-blobs/
add a comment |
Questions about products or services pricing are off topic here.
Anyway, yes, you will pay for used storage space even when no one is actively accessing it; the actual price depends on the type and size of the storage. More info here:
https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/details/storage/page-blobs/
Questions about products or services pricing are off topic here.
Anyway, yes, you will pay for used storage space even when no one is actively accessing it; the actual price depends on the type and size of the storage. More info here:
https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/details/storage/page-blobs/
edited Mar 4 at 20:19
answered Mar 4 at 19:41
MassimoMassimo
53.1k44170282
53.1k44170282
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Server Fault!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f956703%2fwhat-if-i-store-10tb-on-azure-servers-and-then-keep-the-vm-powered-off%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
If you just need some data stored, look at AWS S3, or whatever the matching Azure offering is. No server needed that way.
– Criggie
Mar 5 at 11:22
1
For storage only Backblaze and Wasabi might be a better options. They both are built around storage charges, rather than AWS / Azure who’re about compute primary.
– BaronSamedi1958
Mar 5 at 23:54