Problems with making formula look great [closed]

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












5















I have problems to make the below formula look great. Do you have any ideas on how I can make it look better?
enter image description here



This is this LaTeX code I have for it:



PTK = $PRF(PMK, text"Pairwise key expansion" || Min(AA, SPA) || \ MaxAA, SPA|| Min(ANonce, SNonce) || Max(ANonce,SNonce))$


I appreciate all help!










share|improve this question















closed as primarily opinion-based by JouleV, Sebastiano, Stefan Pinnow, Phelype Oleinik, Raaja Mar 15 at 20:57


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • 2





    Welcome to TeX.SE. In order to help produce an expression that is not only visually appealing but also factually correct and meaningful, it would help to know what || stands for. Please advise.

    – Mico
    Mar 15 at 10:03











  • @Mico Seems more like a norm-like operator to me.

    – Raaja
    Mar 15 at 10:06











  • @Mico In cryptography || means string concatenation.

    – nomadictype
    Mar 15 at 15:16











  • What does "great" mean?

    – David Richerby
    Mar 15 at 18:49











  • Perhaps you could be more specific in your request. What is it that you do not like about your current output? We are happy to help with LaTeXing specific requests, but without explaining what you want, "great" and "better" are matters of opinion.

    – Sandy G
    Mar 15 at 20:27















5















I have problems to make the below formula look great. Do you have any ideas on how I can make it look better?
enter image description here



This is this LaTeX code I have for it:



PTK = $PRF(PMK, text"Pairwise key expansion" || Min(AA, SPA) || \ MaxAA, SPA|| Min(ANonce, SNonce) || Max(ANonce,SNonce))$


I appreciate all help!










share|improve this question















closed as primarily opinion-based by JouleV, Sebastiano, Stefan Pinnow, Phelype Oleinik, Raaja Mar 15 at 20:57


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • 2





    Welcome to TeX.SE. In order to help produce an expression that is not only visually appealing but also factually correct and meaningful, it would help to know what || stands for. Please advise.

    – Mico
    Mar 15 at 10:03











  • @Mico Seems more like a norm-like operator to me.

    – Raaja
    Mar 15 at 10:06











  • @Mico In cryptography || means string concatenation.

    – nomadictype
    Mar 15 at 15:16











  • What does "great" mean?

    – David Richerby
    Mar 15 at 18:49











  • Perhaps you could be more specific in your request. What is it that you do not like about your current output? We are happy to help with LaTeXing specific requests, but without explaining what you want, "great" and "better" are matters of opinion.

    – Sandy G
    Mar 15 at 20:27













5












5








5








I have problems to make the below formula look great. Do you have any ideas on how I can make it look better?
enter image description here



This is this LaTeX code I have for it:



PTK = $PRF(PMK, text"Pairwise key expansion" || Min(AA, SPA) || \ MaxAA, SPA|| Min(ANonce, SNonce) || Max(ANonce,SNonce))$


I appreciate all help!










share|improve this question
















I have problems to make the below formula look great. Do you have any ideas on how I can make it look better?
enter image description here



This is this LaTeX code I have for it:



PTK = $PRF(PMK, text"Pairwise key expansion" || Min(AA, SPA) || \ MaxAA, SPA|| Min(ANonce, SNonce) || Max(ANonce,SNonce))$


I appreciate all help!







math-mode alignment






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 15 at 13:30









JouleV

13.1k22663




13.1k22663










asked Mar 15 at 10:00









JohanJohan

453




453




closed as primarily opinion-based by JouleV, Sebastiano, Stefan Pinnow, Phelype Oleinik, Raaja Mar 15 at 20:57


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









closed as primarily opinion-based by JouleV, Sebastiano, Stefan Pinnow, Phelype Oleinik, Raaja Mar 15 at 20:57


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









  • 2





    Welcome to TeX.SE. In order to help produce an expression that is not only visually appealing but also factually correct and meaningful, it would help to know what || stands for. Please advise.

    – Mico
    Mar 15 at 10:03











  • @Mico Seems more like a norm-like operator to me.

    – Raaja
    Mar 15 at 10:06











  • @Mico In cryptography || means string concatenation.

    – nomadictype
    Mar 15 at 15:16











  • What does "great" mean?

    – David Richerby
    Mar 15 at 18:49











  • Perhaps you could be more specific in your request. What is it that you do not like about your current output? We are happy to help with LaTeXing specific requests, but without explaining what you want, "great" and "better" are matters of opinion.

    – Sandy G
    Mar 15 at 20:27












  • 2





    Welcome to TeX.SE. In order to help produce an expression that is not only visually appealing but also factually correct and meaningful, it would help to know what || stands for. Please advise.

    – Mico
    Mar 15 at 10:03











  • @Mico Seems more like a norm-like operator to me.

    – Raaja
    Mar 15 at 10:06











  • @Mico In cryptography || means string concatenation.

    – nomadictype
    Mar 15 at 15:16











  • What does "great" mean?

    – David Richerby
    Mar 15 at 18:49











  • Perhaps you could be more specific in your request. What is it that you do not like about your current output? We are happy to help with LaTeXing specific requests, but without explaining what you want, "great" and "better" are matters of opinion.

    – Sandy G
    Mar 15 at 20:27







2




2





Welcome to TeX.SE. In order to help produce an expression that is not only visually appealing but also factually correct and meaningful, it would help to know what || stands for. Please advise.

– Mico
Mar 15 at 10:03





Welcome to TeX.SE. In order to help produce an expression that is not only visually appealing but also factually correct and meaningful, it would help to know what || stands for. Please advise.

– Mico
Mar 15 at 10:03













@Mico Seems more like a norm-like operator to me.

– Raaja
Mar 15 at 10:06





@Mico Seems more like a norm-like operator to me.

– Raaja
Mar 15 at 10:06













@Mico In cryptography || means string concatenation.

– nomadictype
Mar 15 at 15:16





@Mico In cryptography || means string concatenation.

– nomadictype
Mar 15 at 15:16













What does "great" mean?

– David Richerby
Mar 15 at 18:49





What does "great" mean?

– David Richerby
Mar 15 at 18:49













Perhaps you could be more specific in your request. What is it that you do not like about your current output? We are happy to help with LaTeXing specific requests, but without explaining what you want, "great" and "better" are matters of opinion.

– Sandy G
Mar 15 at 20:27





Perhaps you could be more specific in your request. What is it that you do not like about your current output? We are happy to help with LaTeXing specific requests, but without explaining what you want, "great" and "better" are matters of opinion.

– Sandy G
Mar 15 at 20:27










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















8














I don't know if it looks great, but do you want something like this?



enter image description here



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath

begindocument

[
beginsplit
textPTK = & textPRFleft( textPMK, text"Pairwise key expansion" || min(textAA, textSPA) || right. \
& left. qquad max(textAA, textSPA)|| min(textANonce, textSNonce) || max(textANonce,textSNonce)right)
endsplit
]

enddocument





share|improve this answer























  • Thanks a lot for the great answer!

    – Johan
    Mar 15 at 10:45


















9














Taking Ignasi's approach a step further...



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
[
beginsplit
textPTK = textPRFbigl( &textPMK, text``Pairwise key expansion'' \& || min(textAA, textSPA) \
& || max(textAA, textSPA)\&|| min(textANonce, textSNonce) \&|| max(textANonce,textSNonce)bigr)
endsplit
]
enddocument


enter image description here



MFGA






share|improve this answer























  • Thanks a lot for the great answer, I'll go for this one!

    – Johan
    Mar 15 at 10:44






  • 2





    @Johan Thanks. While you can click the up-arrow to "upvote" any question or answer on this site that you find helpful, you can select only one answer for each of your questions to click the check on, as a means to "accept" the most suitable answer.

    – Steven B. Segletes
    Mar 15 at 10:49



















5














IMHO your formula is in an algorithm and || stands for "or". So you should have a look at algorithm packages. Anyway this is a non-algorithm but algorithmic answer:



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
[
beginarrayr@l@l
textPTK=PRF&(PMK, & text``Pairwise key expansion''\
&& || min(AA,SPA)\
&& || max(AA,SPA)\
&& || min(ANonce,SNonce)\
&& || max(ANonce,SNonce)\
&)&
endarray
]
enddocument


enter image description here



Edit 1: Improved version



I prefer this way.



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
[
beginarrayrl
textPTK=PRF(&\
& PMK,\
& (\
& quadtext``Pairwise key expansion''\
& quad||min(AA,SPA)\
& quad||max(AA,SPA)\
& quad||min(ANonce,SNonce)\
& quad||max(ANonce,SNonce)\
& )\
)&
endarray
]
enddocument


enter image description here






share|improve this answer

























  • Alright thanks a lot! I'm not so good at LaTeX so I'll go for this one, since it looks much better than before! Not sure how much algorithm package would have improved it, but this looks good enough.

    – Johan
    Mar 15 at 10:43











  • @Johan I already improved my answer.

    – JouleV
    Mar 15 at 10:46


















2














I have two proposals. Most important is to properly define macros for specific object types in your document, in order to ensure uniformity.



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath

newcommandOORmathrel
newcommandtvar[1]mathrm#1
newcommandtdesc[1]textup``#1''

begindocument

[
beginaligned
tvarPTK=tvarPRFbigl(
&tvarPMK,tdescPairwise key expansion \
& OOR min(tvarAA,tvarSPA)\
& OOR max(tvarAA,tvarSPA)\
& OOR min(tvarANonce,tvarSNonce)\
& OOR max(tvarANonce,tvarSNonce) bigr)
endaligned
]

beginmultline*
tvarPTK=tvarPRFbigl(
tvarPMK,tdescPairwise key expansion
OOR min(tvarAA,tvarSPA) OOR \
max(tvarAA,tvarSPA)
OOR min(tvarANonce,tvarSNonce)
OOR max(tvarANonce,tvarSNonce) bigr)
endmultline*

enddocument


enter image description here






share|improve this answer





























    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes








    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    8














    I don't know if it looks great, but do you want something like this?



    enter image description here



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath

    begindocument

    [
    beginsplit
    textPTK = & textPRFleft( textPMK, text"Pairwise key expansion" || min(textAA, textSPA) || right. \
    & left. qquad max(textAA, textSPA)|| min(textANonce, textSNonce) || max(textANonce,textSNonce)right)
    endsplit
    ]

    enddocument





    share|improve this answer























    • Thanks a lot for the great answer!

      – Johan
      Mar 15 at 10:45















    8














    I don't know if it looks great, but do you want something like this?



    enter image description here



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath

    begindocument

    [
    beginsplit
    textPTK = & textPRFleft( textPMK, text"Pairwise key expansion" || min(textAA, textSPA) || right. \
    & left. qquad max(textAA, textSPA)|| min(textANonce, textSNonce) || max(textANonce,textSNonce)right)
    endsplit
    ]

    enddocument





    share|improve this answer























    • Thanks a lot for the great answer!

      – Johan
      Mar 15 at 10:45













    8












    8








    8







    I don't know if it looks great, but do you want something like this?



    enter image description here



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath

    begindocument

    [
    beginsplit
    textPTK = & textPRFleft( textPMK, text"Pairwise key expansion" || min(textAA, textSPA) || right. \
    & left. qquad max(textAA, textSPA)|| min(textANonce, textSNonce) || max(textANonce,textSNonce)right)
    endsplit
    ]

    enddocument





    share|improve this answer













    I don't know if it looks great, but do you want something like this?



    enter image description here



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath

    begindocument

    [
    beginsplit
    textPTK = & textPRFleft( textPMK, text"Pairwise key expansion" || min(textAA, textSPA) || right. \
    & left. qquad max(textAA, textSPA)|| min(textANonce, textSNonce) || max(textANonce,textSNonce)right)
    endsplit
    ]

    enddocument






    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Mar 15 at 10:19









    IgnasiIgnasi

    95.9k4176321




    95.9k4176321












    • Thanks a lot for the great answer!

      – Johan
      Mar 15 at 10:45

















    • Thanks a lot for the great answer!

      – Johan
      Mar 15 at 10:45
















    Thanks a lot for the great answer!

    – Johan
    Mar 15 at 10:45





    Thanks a lot for the great answer!

    – Johan
    Mar 15 at 10:45











    9














    Taking Ignasi's approach a step further...



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath
    begindocument
    [
    beginsplit
    textPTK = textPRFbigl( &textPMK, text``Pairwise key expansion'' \& || min(textAA, textSPA) \
    & || max(textAA, textSPA)\&|| min(textANonce, textSNonce) \&|| max(textANonce,textSNonce)bigr)
    endsplit
    ]
    enddocument


    enter image description here



    MFGA






    share|improve this answer























    • Thanks a lot for the great answer, I'll go for this one!

      – Johan
      Mar 15 at 10:44






    • 2





      @Johan Thanks. While you can click the up-arrow to "upvote" any question or answer on this site that you find helpful, you can select only one answer for each of your questions to click the check on, as a means to "accept" the most suitable answer.

      – Steven B. Segletes
      Mar 15 at 10:49
















    9














    Taking Ignasi's approach a step further...



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath
    begindocument
    [
    beginsplit
    textPTK = textPRFbigl( &textPMK, text``Pairwise key expansion'' \& || min(textAA, textSPA) \
    & || max(textAA, textSPA)\&|| min(textANonce, textSNonce) \&|| max(textANonce,textSNonce)bigr)
    endsplit
    ]
    enddocument


    enter image description here



    MFGA






    share|improve this answer























    • Thanks a lot for the great answer, I'll go for this one!

      – Johan
      Mar 15 at 10:44






    • 2





      @Johan Thanks. While you can click the up-arrow to "upvote" any question or answer on this site that you find helpful, you can select only one answer for each of your questions to click the check on, as a means to "accept" the most suitable answer.

      – Steven B. Segletes
      Mar 15 at 10:49














    9












    9








    9







    Taking Ignasi's approach a step further...



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath
    begindocument
    [
    beginsplit
    textPTK = textPRFbigl( &textPMK, text``Pairwise key expansion'' \& || min(textAA, textSPA) \
    & || max(textAA, textSPA)\&|| min(textANonce, textSNonce) \&|| max(textANonce,textSNonce)bigr)
    endsplit
    ]
    enddocument


    enter image description here



    MFGA






    share|improve this answer













    Taking Ignasi's approach a step further...



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath
    begindocument
    [
    beginsplit
    textPTK = textPRFbigl( &textPMK, text``Pairwise key expansion'' \& || min(textAA, textSPA) \
    & || max(textAA, textSPA)\&|| min(textANonce, textSNonce) \&|| max(textANonce,textSNonce)bigr)
    endsplit
    ]
    enddocument


    enter image description here



    MFGA







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Mar 15 at 10:27









    Steven B. SegletesSteven B. Segletes

    162k9206418




    162k9206418












    • Thanks a lot for the great answer, I'll go for this one!

      – Johan
      Mar 15 at 10:44






    • 2





      @Johan Thanks. While you can click the up-arrow to "upvote" any question or answer on this site that you find helpful, you can select only one answer for each of your questions to click the check on, as a means to "accept" the most suitable answer.

      – Steven B. Segletes
      Mar 15 at 10:49


















    • Thanks a lot for the great answer, I'll go for this one!

      – Johan
      Mar 15 at 10:44






    • 2





      @Johan Thanks. While you can click the up-arrow to "upvote" any question or answer on this site that you find helpful, you can select only one answer for each of your questions to click the check on, as a means to "accept" the most suitable answer.

      – Steven B. Segletes
      Mar 15 at 10:49

















    Thanks a lot for the great answer, I'll go for this one!

    – Johan
    Mar 15 at 10:44





    Thanks a lot for the great answer, I'll go for this one!

    – Johan
    Mar 15 at 10:44




    2




    2





    @Johan Thanks. While you can click the up-arrow to "upvote" any question or answer on this site that you find helpful, you can select only one answer for each of your questions to click the check on, as a means to "accept" the most suitable answer.

    – Steven B. Segletes
    Mar 15 at 10:49






    @Johan Thanks. While you can click the up-arrow to "upvote" any question or answer on this site that you find helpful, you can select only one answer for each of your questions to click the check on, as a means to "accept" the most suitable answer.

    – Steven B. Segletes
    Mar 15 at 10:49












    5














    IMHO your formula is in an algorithm and || stands for "or". So you should have a look at algorithm packages. Anyway this is a non-algorithm but algorithmic answer:



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath
    begindocument
    [
    beginarrayr@l@l
    textPTK=PRF&(PMK, & text``Pairwise key expansion''\
    && || min(AA,SPA)\
    && || max(AA,SPA)\
    && || min(ANonce,SNonce)\
    && || max(ANonce,SNonce)\
    &)&
    endarray
    ]
    enddocument


    enter image description here



    Edit 1: Improved version



    I prefer this way.



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath
    begindocument
    [
    beginarrayrl
    textPTK=PRF(&\
    & PMK,\
    & (\
    & quadtext``Pairwise key expansion''\
    & quad||min(AA,SPA)\
    & quad||max(AA,SPA)\
    & quad||min(ANonce,SNonce)\
    & quad||max(ANonce,SNonce)\
    & )\
    )&
    endarray
    ]
    enddocument


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer

























    • Alright thanks a lot! I'm not so good at LaTeX so I'll go for this one, since it looks much better than before! Not sure how much algorithm package would have improved it, but this looks good enough.

      – Johan
      Mar 15 at 10:43











    • @Johan I already improved my answer.

      – JouleV
      Mar 15 at 10:46















    5














    IMHO your formula is in an algorithm and || stands for "or". So you should have a look at algorithm packages. Anyway this is a non-algorithm but algorithmic answer:



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath
    begindocument
    [
    beginarrayr@l@l
    textPTK=PRF&(PMK, & text``Pairwise key expansion''\
    && || min(AA,SPA)\
    && || max(AA,SPA)\
    && || min(ANonce,SNonce)\
    && || max(ANonce,SNonce)\
    &)&
    endarray
    ]
    enddocument


    enter image description here



    Edit 1: Improved version



    I prefer this way.



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath
    begindocument
    [
    beginarrayrl
    textPTK=PRF(&\
    & PMK,\
    & (\
    & quadtext``Pairwise key expansion''\
    & quad||min(AA,SPA)\
    & quad||max(AA,SPA)\
    & quad||min(ANonce,SNonce)\
    & quad||max(ANonce,SNonce)\
    & )\
    )&
    endarray
    ]
    enddocument


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer

























    • Alright thanks a lot! I'm not so good at LaTeX so I'll go for this one, since it looks much better than before! Not sure how much algorithm package would have improved it, but this looks good enough.

      – Johan
      Mar 15 at 10:43











    • @Johan I already improved my answer.

      – JouleV
      Mar 15 at 10:46













    5












    5








    5







    IMHO your formula is in an algorithm and || stands for "or". So you should have a look at algorithm packages. Anyway this is a non-algorithm but algorithmic answer:



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath
    begindocument
    [
    beginarrayr@l@l
    textPTK=PRF&(PMK, & text``Pairwise key expansion''\
    && || min(AA,SPA)\
    && || max(AA,SPA)\
    && || min(ANonce,SNonce)\
    && || max(ANonce,SNonce)\
    &)&
    endarray
    ]
    enddocument


    enter image description here



    Edit 1: Improved version



    I prefer this way.



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath
    begindocument
    [
    beginarrayrl
    textPTK=PRF(&\
    & PMK,\
    & (\
    & quadtext``Pairwise key expansion''\
    & quad||min(AA,SPA)\
    & quad||max(AA,SPA)\
    & quad||min(ANonce,SNonce)\
    & quad||max(ANonce,SNonce)\
    & )\
    )&
    endarray
    ]
    enddocument


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer















    IMHO your formula is in an algorithm and || stands for "or". So you should have a look at algorithm packages. Anyway this is a non-algorithm but algorithmic answer:



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath
    begindocument
    [
    beginarrayr@l@l
    textPTK=PRF&(PMK, & text``Pairwise key expansion''\
    && || min(AA,SPA)\
    && || max(AA,SPA)\
    && || min(ANonce,SNonce)\
    && || max(ANonce,SNonce)\
    &)&
    endarray
    ]
    enddocument


    enter image description here



    Edit 1: Improved version



    I prefer this way.



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath
    begindocument
    [
    beginarrayrl
    textPTK=PRF(&\
    & PMK,\
    & (\
    & quadtext``Pairwise key expansion''\
    & quad||min(AA,SPA)\
    & quad||max(AA,SPA)\
    & quad||min(ANonce,SNonce)\
    & quad||max(ANonce,SNonce)\
    & )\
    )&
    endarray
    ]
    enddocument


    enter image description here







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Mar 15 at 12:15

























    answered Mar 15 at 10:39









    JouleVJouleV

    13.1k22663




    13.1k22663












    • Alright thanks a lot! I'm not so good at LaTeX so I'll go for this one, since it looks much better than before! Not sure how much algorithm package would have improved it, but this looks good enough.

      – Johan
      Mar 15 at 10:43











    • @Johan I already improved my answer.

      – JouleV
      Mar 15 at 10:46

















    • Alright thanks a lot! I'm not so good at LaTeX so I'll go for this one, since it looks much better than before! Not sure how much algorithm package would have improved it, but this looks good enough.

      – Johan
      Mar 15 at 10:43











    • @Johan I already improved my answer.

      – JouleV
      Mar 15 at 10:46
















    Alright thanks a lot! I'm not so good at LaTeX so I'll go for this one, since it looks much better than before! Not sure how much algorithm package would have improved it, but this looks good enough.

    – Johan
    Mar 15 at 10:43





    Alright thanks a lot! I'm not so good at LaTeX so I'll go for this one, since it looks much better than before! Not sure how much algorithm package would have improved it, but this looks good enough.

    – Johan
    Mar 15 at 10:43













    @Johan I already improved my answer.

    – JouleV
    Mar 15 at 10:46





    @Johan I already improved my answer.

    – JouleV
    Mar 15 at 10:46











    2














    I have two proposals. Most important is to properly define macros for specific object types in your document, in order to ensure uniformity.



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath

    newcommandOORmathrel
    newcommandtvar[1]mathrm#1
    newcommandtdesc[1]textup``#1''

    begindocument

    [
    beginaligned
    tvarPTK=tvarPRFbigl(
    &tvarPMK,tdescPairwise key expansion \
    & OOR min(tvarAA,tvarSPA)\
    & OOR max(tvarAA,tvarSPA)\
    & OOR min(tvarANonce,tvarSNonce)\
    & OOR max(tvarANonce,tvarSNonce) bigr)
    endaligned
    ]

    beginmultline*
    tvarPTK=tvarPRFbigl(
    tvarPMK,tdescPairwise key expansion
    OOR min(tvarAA,tvarSPA) OOR \
    max(tvarAA,tvarSPA)
    OOR min(tvarANonce,tvarSNonce)
    OOR max(tvarANonce,tvarSNonce) bigr)
    endmultline*

    enddocument


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer



























      2














      I have two proposals. Most important is to properly define macros for specific object types in your document, in order to ensure uniformity.



      documentclassarticle
      usepackageamsmath

      newcommandOORmathrel
      newcommandtvar[1]mathrm#1
      newcommandtdesc[1]textup``#1''

      begindocument

      [
      beginaligned
      tvarPTK=tvarPRFbigl(
      &tvarPMK,tdescPairwise key expansion \
      & OOR min(tvarAA,tvarSPA)\
      & OOR max(tvarAA,tvarSPA)\
      & OOR min(tvarANonce,tvarSNonce)\
      & OOR max(tvarANonce,tvarSNonce) bigr)
      endaligned
      ]

      beginmultline*
      tvarPTK=tvarPRFbigl(
      tvarPMK,tdescPairwise key expansion
      OOR min(tvarAA,tvarSPA) OOR \
      max(tvarAA,tvarSPA)
      OOR min(tvarANonce,tvarSNonce)
      OOR max(tvarANonce,tvarSNonce) bigr)
      endmultline*

      enddocument


      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer

























        2












        2








        2







        I have two proposals. Most important is to properly define macros for specific object types in your document, in order to ensure uniformity.



        documentclassarticle
        usepackageamsmath

        newcommandOORmathrel
        newcommandtvar[1]mathrm#1
        newcommandtdesc[1]textup``#1''

        begindocument

        [
        beginaligned
        tvarPTK=tvarPRFbigl(
        &tvarPMK,tdescPairwise key expansion \
        & OOR min(tvarAA,tvarSPA)\
        & OOR max(tvarAA,tvarSPA)\
        & OOR min(tvarANonce,tvarSNonce)\
        & OOR max(tvarANonce,tvarSNonce) bigr)
        endaligned
        ]

        beginmultline*
        tvarPTK=tvarPRFbigl(
        tvarPMK,tdescPairwise key expansion
        OOR min(tvarAA,tvarSPA) OOR \
        max(tvarAA,tvarSPA)
        OOR min(tvarANonce,tvarSNonce)
        OOR max(tvarANonce,tvarSNonce) bigr)
        endmultline*

        enddocument


        enter image description here






        share|improve this answer













        I have two proposals. Most important is to properly define macros for specific object types in your document, in order to ensure uniformity.



        documentclassarticle
        usepackageamsmath

        newcommandOORmathrel
        newcommandtvar[1]mathrm#1
        newcommandtdesc[1]textup``#1''

        begindocument

        [
        beginaligned
        tvarPTK=tvarPRFbigl(
        &tvarPMK,tdescPairwise key expansion \
        & OOR min(tvarAA,tvarSPA)\
        & OOR max(tvarAA,tvarSPA)\
        & OOR min(tvarANonce,tvarSNonce)\
        & OOR max(tvarANonce,tvarSNonce) bigr)
        endaligned
        ]

        beginmultline*
        tvarPTK=tvarPRFbigl(
        tvarPMK,tdescPairwise key expansion
        OOR min(tvarAA,tvarSPA) OOR \
        max(tvarAA,tvarSPA)
        OOR min(tvarANonce,tvarSNonce)
        OOR max(tvarANonce,tvarSNonce) bigr)
        endmultline*

        enddocument


        enter image description here







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Mar 15 at 11:52









        egregegreg

        734k8919323256




        734k8919323256












            Popular posts from this blog

            How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

            Bahrain

            Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay