Mathematics and the art of linearizing the circle

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












11












$begingroup$


[I edited the question and put stronger emphasis on "constant curvature" than on "naturalness".]




One of the most prominent problems of ancient mathematics was the squaring of the circle: to construct the square with the same area as a given circle.



A related problem is linearizing the circle: to find a natural transition between a given line segment of length $L$ (having constant curvature $0 = 1/infty$) and the circle with circumference $U = 2pi R = L$ (with constant curvature $1/R$) going through circle segments of length $L$ (with intermediate constant curvatures $1/R'$, $infty > R' > R$).



The question is: Along which paths do the points of the line segment move to finally yield the circle?



This is how the transition looks like:



enter image description here



The points of the line segments follow these paths:



enter image description here



as can be seen here:



enter image description here



To be honest: Even though these paths look very much like circle segments, I'm not quite sure and I didn't define them by an explicit formula (which I didn't have at hand) but heuristically using some support points and splining.



My questions are:




  • Are these paths really circle segments?


  • If so: How to parametrize them?


  • If not so: What kind of curves are they otherwise?





Please allow me – freely associating – to compare the pictures above with this (artificially symmetrized) picture of The Great Wave off Kanagawa



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Do we have an actual definition of what it means for this transition to "appear natural"?
    $endgroup$
    – Morgan Rodgers
    Feb 27 at 17:56






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    I think it would be "natural" to think of a family of curves $gamma_t$, $tin[0,1]$, of constant curvature such that $gamma_0$ is the flat line (curvature 0), $gamma_1$ is the circle (curvature 1/R) and each $gamma_t$ has curvature $tcdot1/R$.
    $endgroup$
    – Mars Plastic
    Feb 27 at 18:06






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I think you could probably make a map that "appears natural" using circles for the paths, and you could also probably make a different map without using circles that also "appears natural". So without a definition of what that term means, I don't know what answer you are looking for.
    $endgroup$
    – Morgan Rodgers
    Feb 27 at 18:08







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Maybe I'm missing something, but this 'transition' seems quite arbitrary to me.
    $endgroup$
    – rafa11111
    Feb 27 at 18:20






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You ask about making it "appear natural", but it's not clear what this means. You have things that look like circle segments, and you ask if they "really are circle segments", but we just have a picture, so how can we tell?
    $endgroup$
    – Morgan Rodgers
    Feb 27 at 18:34















11












$begingroup$


[I edited the question and put stronger emphasis on "constant curvature" than on "naturalness".]




One of the most prominent problems of ancient mathematics was the squaring of the circle: to construct the square with the same area as a given circle.



A related problem is linearizing the circle: to find a natural transition between a given line segment of length $L$ (having constant curvature $0 = 1/infty$) and the circle with circumference $U = 2pi R = L$ (with constant curvature $1/R$) going through circle segments of length $L$ (with intermediate constant curvatures $1/R'$, $infty > R' > R$).



The question is: Along which paths do the points of the line segment move to finally yield the circle?



This is how the transition looks like:



enter image description here



The points of the line segments follow these paths:



enter image description here



as can be seen here:



enter image description here



To be honest: Even though these paths look very much like circle segments, I'm not quite sure and I didn't define them by an explicit formula (which I didn't have at hand) but heuristically using some support points and splining.



My questions are:




  • Are these paths really circle segments?


  • If so: How to parametrize them?


  • If not so: What kind of curves are they otherwise?





Please allow me – freely associating – to compare the pictures above with this (artificially symmetrized) picture of The Great Wave off Kanagawa



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Do we have an actual definition of what it means for this transition to "appear natural"?
    $endgroup$
    – Morgan Rodgers
    Feb 27 at 17:56






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    I think it would be "natural" to think of a family of curves $gamma_t$, $tin[0,1]$, of constant curvature such that $gamma_0$ is the flat line (curvature 0), $gamma_1$ is the circle (curvature 1/R) and each $gamma_t$ has curvature $tcdot1/R$.
    $endgroup$
    – Mars Plastic
    Feb 27 at 18:06






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I think you could probably make a map that "appears natural" using circles for the paths, and you could also probably make a different map without using circles that also "appears natural". So without a definition of what that term means, I don't know what answer you are looking for.
    $endgroup$
    – Morgan Rodgers
    Feb 27 at 18:08







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Maybe I'm missing something, but this 'transition' seems quite arbitrary to me.
    $endgroup$
    – rafa11111
    Feb 27 at 18:20






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You ask about making it "appear natural", but it's not clear what this means. You have things that look like circle segments, and you ask if they "really are circle segments", but we just have a picture, so how can we tell?
    $endgroup$
    – Morgan Rodgers
    Feb 27 at 18:34













11












11








11


5



$begingroup$


[I edited the question and put stronger emphasis on "constant curvature" than on "naturalness".]




One of the most prominent problems of ancient mathematics was the squaring of the circle: to construct the square with the same area as a given circle.



A related problem is linearizing the circle: to find a natural transition between a given line segment of length $L$ (having constant curvature $0 = 1/infty$) and the circle with circumference $U = 2pi R = L$ (with constant curvature $1/R$) going through circle segments of length $L$ (with intermediate constant curvatures $1/R'$, $infty > R' > R$).



The question is: Along which paths do the points of the line segment move to finally yield the circle?



This is how the transition looks like:



enter image description here



The points of the line segments follow these paths:



enter image description here



as can be seen here:



enter image description here



To be honest: Even though these paths look very much like circle segments, I'm not quite sure and I didn't define them by an explicit formula (which I didn't have at hand) but heuristically using some support points and splining.



My questions are:




  • Are these paths really circle segments?


  • If so: How to parametrize them?


  • If not so: What kind of curves are they otherwise?





Please allow me – freely associating – to compare the pictures above with this (artificially symmetrized) picture of The Great Wave off Kanagawa



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




[I edited the question and put stronger emphasis on "constant curvature" than on "naturalness".]




One of the most prominent problems of ancient mathematics was the squaring of the circle: to construct the square with the same area as a given circle.



A related problem is linearizing the circle: to find a natural transition between a given line segment of length $L$ (having constant curvature $0 = 1/infty$) and the circle with circumference $U = 2pi R = L$ (with constant curvature $1/R$) going through circle segments of length $L$ (with intermediate constant curvatures $1/R'$, $infty > R' > R$).



The question is: Along which paths do the points of the line segment move to finally yield the circle?



This is how the transition looks like:



enter image description here



The points of the line segments follow these paths:



enter image description here



as can be seen here:



enter image description here



To be honest: Even though these paths look very much like circle segments, I'm not quite sure and I didn't define them by an explicit formula (which I didn't have at hand) but heuristically using some support points and splining.



My questions are:




  • Are these paths really circle segments?


  • If so: How to parametrize them?


  • If not so: What kind of curves are they otherwise?





Please allow me – freely associating – to compare the pictures above with this (artificially symmetrized) picture of The Great Wave off Kanagawa



enter image description here







modular-arithmetic euclidean-geometry projective-geometry visualization art






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Feb 28 at 8:46







Hans-Peter Stricker

















asked Feb 27 at 16:59









Hans-Peter StrickerHans-Peter Stricker

6,69443995




6,69443995







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Do we have an actual definition of what it means for this transition to "appear natural"?
    $endgroup$
    – Morgan Rodgers
    Feb 27 at 17:56






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    I think it would be "natural" to think of a family of curves $gamma_t$, $tin[0,1]$, of constant curvature such that $gamma_0$ is the flat line (curvature 0), $gamma_1$ is the circle (curvature 1/R) and each $gamma_t$ has curvature $tcdot1/R$.
    $endgroup$
    – Mars Plastic
    Feb 27 at 18:06






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I think you could probably make a map that "appears natural" using circles for the paths, and you could also probably make a different map without using circles that also "appears natural". So without a definition of what that term means, I don't know what answer you are looking for.
    $endgroup$
    – Morgan Rodgers
    Feb 27 at 18:08







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Maybe I'm missing something, but this 'transition' seems quite arbitrary to me.
    $endgroup$
    – rafa11111
    Feb 27 at 18:20






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You ask about making it "appear natural", but it's not clear what this means. You have things that look like circle segments, and you ask if they "really are circle segments", but we just have a picture, so how can we tell?
    $endgroup$
    – Morgan Rodgers
    Feb 27 at 18:34












  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Do we have an actual definition of what it means for this transition to "appear natural"?
    $endgroup$
    – Morgan Rodgers
    Feb 27 at 17:56






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    I think it would be "natural" to think of a family of curves $gamma_t$, $tin[0,1]$, of constant curvature such that $gamma_0$ is the flat line (curvature 0), $gamma_1$ is the circle (curvature 1/R) and each $gamma_t$ has curvature $tcdot1/R$.
    $endgroup$
    – Mars Plastic
    Feb 27 at 18:06






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I think you could probably make a map that "appears natural" using circles for the paths, and you could also probably make a different map without using circles that also "appears natural". So without a definition of what that term means, I don't know what answer you are looking for.
    $endgroup$
    – Morgan Rodgers
    Feb 27 at 18:08







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Maybe I'm missing something, but this 'transition' seems quite arbitrary to me.
    $endgroup$
    – rafa11111
    Feb 27 at 18:20






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You ask about making it "appear natural", but it's not clear what this means. You have things that look like circle segments, and you ask if they "really are circle segments", but we just have a picture, so how can we tell?
    $endgroup$
    – Morgan Rodgers
    Feb 27 at 18:34







4




4




$begingroup$
Do we have an actual definition of what it means for this transition to "appear natural"?
$endgroup$
– Morgan Rodgers
Feb 27 at 17:56




$begingroup$
Do we have an actual definition of what it means for this transition to "appear natural"?
$endgroup$
– Morgan Rodgers
Feb 27 at 17:56




5




5




$begingroup$
I think it would be "natural" to think of a family of curves $gamma_t$, $tin[0,1]$, of constant curvature such that $gamma_0$ is the flat line (curvature 0), $gamma_1$ is the circle (curvature 1/R) and each $gamma_t$ has curvature $tcdot1/R$.
$endgroup$
– Mars Plastic
Feb 27 at 18:06




$begingroup$
I think it would be "natural" to think of a family of curves $gamma_t$, $tin[0,1]$, of constant curvature such that $gamma_0$ is the flat line (curvature 0), $gamma_1$ is the circle (curvature 1/R) and each $gamma_t$ has curvature $tcdot1/R$.
$endgroup$
– Mars Plastic
Feb 27 at 18:06




2




2




$begingroup$
I think you could probably make a map that "appears natural" using circles for the paths, and you could also probably make a different map without using circles that also "appears natural". So without a definition of what that term means, I don't know what answer you are looking for.
$endgroup$
– Morgan Rodgers
Feb 27 at 18:08





$begingroup$
I think you could probably make a map that "appears natural" using circles for the paths, and you could also probably make a different map without using circles that also "appears natural". So without a definition of what that term means, I don't know what answer you are looking for.
$endgroup$
– Morgan Rodgers
Feb 27 at 18:08





2




2




$begingroup$
Maybe I'm missing something, but this 'transition' seems quite arbitrary to me.
$endgroup$
– rafa11111
Feb 27 at 18:20




$begingroup$
Maybe I'm missing something, but this 'transition' seems quite arbitrary to me.
$endgroup$
– rafa11111
Feb 27 at 18:20




2




2




$begingroup$
You ask about making it "appear natural", but it's not clear what this means. You have things that look like circle segments, and you ask if they "really are circle segments", but we just have a picture, so how can we tell?
$endgroup$
– Morgan Rodgers
Feb 27 at 18:34




$begingroup$
You ask about making it "appear natural", but it's not clear what this means. You have things that look like circle segments, and you ask if they "really are circle segments", but we just have a picture, so how can we tell?
$endgroup$
– Morgan Rodgers
Feb 27 at 18:34










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















15












$begingroup$

What you want can be achieved using circle arcs, centered at $(0,r)$, of radius $r$ and central angle $2pi R/r$, with $r$ varying between $1$ and $+infty$. But I don't know if that is "natural" or not. Here's how it looks:



enter image description here



EDIT.



Each endpoint of the arc describes a spiral curve, given by:
$$
x=pi Rover 2thetasin2theta,quad y=pi Rover 2thetaleft(1-cos2thetaright),
$$

where $theta$ is the polar angle.
This also gives the simple polar equation:
$$
rho=pi Rsin thetaovertheta,quad 0lethetalepiover2.
$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    That's essentially my approach. Good to know, that an expert like you came to the same conclusion. Concerning "natural": which approach could be more "natural"?
    $endgroup$
    – Hans-Peter Stricker
    Feb 27 at 19:23










  • $begingroup$
    How (and with which tools) did you create your elegant animated gif? (I had a hard time with mine.)
    $endgroup$
    – Hans-Peter Stricker
    Feb 27 at 19:45











  • $begingroup$
    I used GeoGebra, which is free: www.geogebra.org
    $endgroup$
    – Aretino
    Feb 27 at 20:20










  • $begingroup$
    Can you share this plot with me, i.e. save the plot and share the link?
    $endgroup$
    – Hans-Peter Stricker
    Feb 27 at 20:49






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    The path of the endpoints is some kind of spiral: $$left(pisin tover t,pi1-cos tover tright).$$
    $endgroup$
    – Aretino
    Feb 27 at 21:20



















3












$begingroup$

If we want this transition to have all the points on the boundary of a circle at all times, then it makes most sense to parameterize by the radius of this circle (and apply a transformation to get it in terms of finite time later). For simplicity, I will also have the transition be to a vertical line.



We shall have the radius of the circle $C_r$ be $r$ and centre be $(-r,0)$, such that $(0,0)$ is on $C_r$ for all $r$. The coordinates of the point at arclength $s$ from $(0,0)$ are then given by $(r (cos(s/r) - 1), r sin(s/r))$.



The most natural way to transition would likely be varying the curvature at a constant rate; thus we create a family of curves $f_t:[-pi, pi]tomathbbR^2$ where $tin[0,1]$ by
beginalign
f_t(s) &= left(fraccos(s(1-t))-11-t, fracsin(s(1-t))1-tright)&t<1\
f_1(s) &= (0, s)&
endalign



Since the goals here seem to be rather subjective, I would attempt this and see how it looks to you (beyond making substitutions as needed to result in a horizontal line).






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note that the paths of the endpoints are given by setting $s = pm pi$ in your parametric curve. The resulting paths are not circle segments (as the OP guessed they might be); this can be seen by calculating their curvature.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Seifert
    Feb 27 at 21:57











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3129072%2fmathematics-and-the-art-of-linearizing-the-circle%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









15












$begingroup$

What you want can be achieved using circle arcs, centered at $(0,r)$, of radius $r$ and central angle $2pi R/r$, with $r$ varying between $1$ and $+infty$. But I don't know if that is "natural" or not. Here's how it looks:



enter image description here



EDIT.



Each endpoint of the arc describes a spiral curve, given by:
$$
x=pi Rover 2thetasin2theta,quad y=pi Rover 2thetaleft(1-cos2thetaright),
$$

where $theta$ is the polar angle.
This also gives the simple polar equation:
$$
rho=pi Rsin thetaovertheta,quad 0lethetalepiover2.
$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    That's essentially my approach. Good to know, that an expert like you came to the same conclusion. Concerning "natural": which approach could be more "natural"?
    $endgroup$
    – Hans-Peter Stricker
    Feb 27 at 19:23










  • $begingroup$
    How (and with which tools) did you create your elegant animated gif? (I had a hard time with mine.)
    $endgroup$
    – Hans-Peter Stricker
    Feb 27 at 19:45











  • $begingroup$
    I used GeoGebra, which is free: www.geogebra.org
    $endgroup$
    – Aretino
    Feb 27 at 20:20










  • $begingroup$
    Can you share this plot with me, i.e. save the plot and share the link?
    $endgroup$
    – Hans-Peter Stricker
    Feb 27 at 20:49






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    The path of the endpoints is some kind of spiral: $$left(pisin tover t,pi1-cos tover tright).$$
    $endgroup$
    – Aretino
    Feb 27 at 21:20
















15












$begingroup$

What you want can be achieved using circle arcs, centered at $(0,r)$, of radius $r$ and central angle $2pi R/r$, with $r$ varying between $1$ and $+infty$. But I don't know if that is "natural" or not. Here's how it looks:



enter image description here



EDIT.



Each endpoint of the arc describes a spiral curve, given by:
$$
x=pi Rover 2thetasin2theta,quad y=pi Rover 2thetaleft(1-cos2thetaright),
$$

where $theta$ is the polar angle.
This also gives the simple polar equation:
$$
rho=pi Rsin thetaovertheta,quad 0lethetalepiover2.
$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    That's essentially my approach. Good to know, that an expert like you came to the same conclusion. Concerning "natural": which approach could be more "natural"?
    $endgroup$
    – Hans-Peter Stricker
    Feb 27 at 19:23










  • $begingroup$
    How (and with which tools) did you create your elegant animated gif? (I had a hard time with mine.)
    $endgroup$
    – Hans-Peter Stricker
    Feb 27 at 19:45











  • $begingroup$
    I used GeoGebra, which is free: www.geogebra.org
    $endgroup$
    – Aretino
    Feb 27 at 20:20










  • $begingroup$
    Can you share this plot with me, i.e. save the plot and share the link?
    $endgroup$
    – Hans-Peter Stricker
    Feb 27 at 20:49






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    The path of the endpoints is some kind of spiral: $$left(pisin tover t,pi1-cos tover tright).$$
    $endgroup$
    – Aretino
    Feb 27 at 21:20














15












15








15





$begingroup$

What you want can be achieved using circle arcs, centered at $(0,r)$, of radius $r$ and central angle $2pi R/r$, with $r$ varying between $1$ and $+infty$. But I don't know if that is "natural" or not. Here's how it looks:



enter image description here



EDIT.



Each endpoint of the arc describes a spiral curve, given by:
$$
x=pi Rover 2thetasin2theta,quad y=pi Rover 2thetaleft(1-cos2thetaright),
$$

where $theta$ is the polar angle.
This also gives the simple polar equation:
$$
rho=pi Rsin thetaovertheta,quad 0lethetalepiover2.
$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



What you want can be achieved using circle arcs, centered at $(0,r)$, of radius $r$ and central angle $2pi R/r$, with $r$ varying between $1$ and $+infty$. But I don't know if that is "natural" or not. Here's how it looks:



enter image description here



EDIT.



Each endpoint of the arc describes a spiral curve, given by:
$$
x=pi Rover 2thetasin2theta,quad y=pi Rover 2thetaleft(1-cos2thetaright),
$$

where $theta$ is the polar angle.
This also gives the simple polar equation:
$$
rho=pi Rsin thetaovertheta,quad 0lethetalepiover2.
$$







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Feb 28 at 14:46

























answered Feb 27 at 18:13









AretinoAretino

25.6k21445




25.6k21445











  • $begingroup$
    That's essentially my approach. Good to know, that an expert like you came to the same conclusion. Concerning "natural": which approach could be more "natural"?
    $endgroup$
    – Hans-Peter Stricker
    Feb 27 at 19:23










  • $begingroup$
    How (and with which tools) did you create your elegant animated gif? (I had a hard time with mine.)
    $endgroup$
    – Hans-Peter Stricker
    Feb 27 at 19:45











  • $begingroup$
    I used GeoGebra, which is free: www.geogebra.org
    $endgroup$
    – Aretino
    Feb 27 at 20:20










  • $begingroup$
    Can you share this plot with me, i.e. save the plot and share the link?
    $endgroup$
    – Hans-Peter Stricker
    Feb 27 at 20:49






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    The path of the endpoints is some kind of spiral: $$left(pisin tover t,pi1-cos tover tright).$$
    $endgroup$
    – Aretino
    Feb 27 at 21:20

















  • $begingroup$
    That's essentially my approach. Good to know, that an expert like you came to the same conclusion. Concerning "natural": which approach could be more "natural"?
    $endgroup$
    – Hans-Peter Stricker
    Feb 27 at 19:23










  • $begingroup$
    How (and with which tools) did you create your elegant animated gif? (I had a hard time with mine.)
    $endgroup$
    – Hans-Peter Stricker
    Feb 27 at 19:45











  • $begingroup$
    I used GeoGebra, which is free: www.geogebra.org
    $endgroup$
    – Aretino
    Feb 27 at 20:20










  • $begingroup$
    Can you share this plot with me, i.e. save the plot and share the link?
    $endgroup$
    – Hans-Peter Stricker
    Feb 27 at 20:49






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    The path of the endpoints is some kind of spiral: $$left(pisin tover t,pi1-cos tover tright).$$
    $endgroup$
    – Aretino
    Feb 27 at 21:20
















$begingroup$
That's essentially my approach. Good to know, that an expert like you came to the same conclusion. Concerning "natural": which approach could be more "natural"?
$endgroup$
– Hans-Peter Stricker
Feb 27 at 19:23




$begingroup$
That's essentially my approach. Good to know, that an expert like you came to the same conclusion. Concerning "natural": which approach could be more "natural"?
$endgroup$
– Hans-Peter Stricker
Feb 27 at 19:23












$begingroup$
How (and with which tools) did you create your elegant animated gif? (I had a hard time with mine.)
$endgroup$
– Hans-Peter Stricker
Feb 27 at 19:45





$begingroup$
How (and with which tools) did you create your elegant animated gif? (I had a hard time with mine.)
$endgroup$
– Hans-Peter Stricker
Feb 27 at 19:45













$begingroup$
I used GeoGebra, which is free: www.geogebra.org
$endgroup$
– Aretino
Feb 27 at 20:20




$begingroup$
I used GeoGebra, which is free: www.geogebra.org
$endgroup$
– Aretino
Feb 27 at 20:20












$begingroup$
Can you share this plot with me, i.e. save the plot and share the link?
$endgroup$
– Hans-Peter Stricker
Feb 27 at 20:49




$begingroup$
Can you share this plot with me, i.e. save the plot and share the link?
$endgroup$
– Hans-Peter Stricker
Feb 27 at 20:49




3




3




$begingroup$
The path of the endpoints is some kind of spiral: $$left(pisin tover t,pi1-cos tover tright).$$
$endgroup$
– Aretino
Feb 27 at 21:20





$begingroup$
The path of the endpoints is some kind of spiral: $$left(pisin tover t,pi1-cos tover tright).$$
$endgroup$
– Aretino
Feb 27 at 21:20












3












$begingroup$

If we want this transition to have all the points on the boundary of a circle at all times, then it makes most sense to parameterize by the radius of this circle (and apply a transformation to get it in terms of finite time later). For simplicity, I will also have the transition be to a vertical line.



We shall have the radius of the circle $C_r$ be $r$ and centre be $(-r,0)$, such that $(0,0)$ is on $C_r$ for all $r$. The coordinates of the point at arclength $s$ from $(0,0)$ are then given by $(r (cos(s/r) - 1), r sin(s/r))$.



The most natural way to transition would likely be varying the curvature at a constant rate; thus we create a family of curves $f_t:[-pi, pi]tomathbbR^2$ where $tin[0,1]$ by
beginalign
f_t(s) &= left(fraccos(s(1-t))-11-t, fracsin(s(1-t))1-tright)&t<1\
f_1(s) &= (0, s)&
endalign



Since the goals here seem to be rather subjective, I would attempt this and see how it looks to you (beyond making substitutions as needed to result in a horizontal line).






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note that the paths of the endpoints are given by setting $s = pm pi$ in your parametric curve. The resulting paths are not circle segments (as the OP guessed they might be); this can be seen by calculating their curvature.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Seifert
    Feb 27 at 21:57
















3












$begingroup$

If we want this transition to have all the points on the boundary of a circle at all times, then it makes most sense to parameterize by the radius of this circle (and apply a transformation to get it in terms of finite time later). For simplicity, I will also have the transition be to a vertical line.



We shall have the radius of the circle $C_r$ be $r$ and centre be $(-r,0)$, such that $(0,0)$ is on $C_r$ for all $r$. The coordinates of the point at arclength $s$ from $(0,0)$ are then given by $(r (cos(s/r) - 1), r sin(s/r))$.



The most natural way to transition would likely be varying the curvature at a constant rate; thus we create a family of curves $f_t:[-pi, pi]tomathbbR^2$ where $tin[0,1]$ by
beginalign
f_t(s) &= left(fraccos(s(1-t))-11-t, fracsin(s(1-t))1-tright)&t<1\
f_1(s) &= (0, s)&
endalign



Since the goals here seem to be rather subjective, I would attempt this and see how it looks to you (beyond making substitutions as needed to result in a horizontal line).






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note that the paths of the endpoints are given by setting $s = pm pi$ in your parametric curve. The resulting paths are not circle segments (as the OP guessed they might be); this can be seen by calculating their curvature.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Seifert
    Feb 27 at 21:57














3












3








3





$begingroup$

If we want this transition to have all the points on the boundary of a circle at all times, then it makes most sense to parameterize by the radius of this circle (and apply a transformation to get it in terms of finite time later). For simplicity, I will also have the transition be to a vertical line.



We shall have the radius of the circle $C_r$ be $r$ and centre be $(-r,0)$, such that $(0,0)$ is on $C_r$ for all $r$. The coordinates of the point at arclength $s$ from $(0,0)$ are then given by $(r (cos(s/r) - 1), r sin(s/r))$.



The most natural way to transition would likely be varying the curvature at a constant rate; thus we create a family of curves $f_t:[-pi, pi]tomathbbR^2$ where $tin[0,1]$ by
beginalign
f_t(s) &= left(fraccos(s(1-t))-11-t, fracsin(s(1-t))1-tright)&t<1\
f_1(s) &= (0, s)&
endalign



Since the goals here seem to be rather subjective, I would attempt this and see how it looks to you (beyond making substitutions as needed to result in a horizontal line).






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



If we want this transition to have all the points on the boundary of a circle at all times, then it makes most sense to parameterize by the radius of this circle (and apply a transformation to get it in terms of finite time later). For simplicity, I will also have the transition be to a vertical line.



We shall have the radius of the circle $C_r$ be $r$ and centre be $(-r,0)$, such that $(0,0)$ is on $C_r$ for all $r$. The coordinates of the point at arclength $s$ from $(0,0)$ are then given by $(r (cos(s/r) - 1), r sin(s/r))$.



The most natural way to transition would likely be varying the curvature at a constant rate; thus we create a family of curves $f_t:[-pi, pi]tomathbbR^2$ where $tin[0,1]$ by
beginalign
f_t(s) &= left(fraccos(s(1-t))-11-t, fracsin(s(1-t))1-tright)&t<1\
f_1(s) &= (0, s)&
endalign



Since the goals here seem to be rather subjective, I would attempt this and see how it looks to you (beyond making substitutions as needed to result in a horizontal line).







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Feb 27 at 18:23









KhorossKhoross

811




811







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note that the paths of the endpoints are given by setting $s = pm pi$ in your parametric curve. The resulting paths are not circle segments (as the OP guessed they might be); this can be seen by calculating their curvature.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Seifert
    Feb 27 at 21:57













  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note that the paths of the endpoints are given by setting $s = pm pi$ in your parametric curve. The resulting paths are not circle segments (as the OP guessed they might be); this can be seen by calculating their curvature.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Seifert
    Feb 27 at 21:57








1




1




$begingroup$
Note that the paths of the endpoints are given by setting $s = pm pi$ in your parametric curve. The resulting paths are not circle segments (as the OP guessed they might be); this can be seen by calculating their curvature.
$endgroup$
– Michael Seifert
Feb 27 at 21:57





$begingroup$
Note that the paths of the endpoints are given by setting $s = pm pi$ in your parametric curve. The resulting paths are not circle segments (as the OP guessed they might be); this can be seen by calculating their curvature.
$endgroup$
– Michael Seifert
Feb 27 at 21:57


















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3129072%2fmathematics-and-the-art-of-linearizing-the-circle%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown






Popular posts from this blog

Peggy Mitchell

Palaiologos

The Forum (Inglewood, California)