Licensing an idea to public?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












2















With my research, it looks like a patent doesn't really make much profit from it due to the high maintenance fee. So I'm thinking is it possible to license my idea to public (for free or way less money) so that anyone can integrate into their product while they can't register as their patent. Something like Creative Common for innovations. Is there such a method?










share|improve this question




























    2















    With my research, it looks like a patent doesn't really make much profit from it due to the high maintenance fee. So I'm thinking is it possible to license my idea to public (for free or way less money) so that anyone can integrate into their product while they can't register as their patent. Something like Creative Common for innovations. Is there such a method?










    share|improve this question


























      2












      2








      2








      With my research, it looks like a patent doesn't really make much profit from it due to the high maintenance fee. So I'm thinking is it possible to license my idea to public (for free or way less money) so that anyone can integrate into their product while they can't register as their patent. Something like Creative Common for innovations. Is there such a method?










      share|improve this question
















      With my research, it looks like a patent doesn't really make much profit from it due to the high maintenance fee. So I'm thinking is it possible to license my idea to public (for free or way less money) so that anyone can integrate into their product while they can't register as their patent. Something like Creative Common for innovations. Is there such a method?







      united-states patents creative-commons public-domain






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Feb 15 at 2:38









      Community

      1




      1










      asked Feb 14 at 19:03









      Andrew-at-TWAndrew-at-TW

      608




      608




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          7














          You are correct that it is quite expensive to patent something in U.S. law.



          Under U.S. patent law, once an idea is publicly published, if no one else has a patent application for the same idea that is pending, the idea enters the public domain and no one can obtain a patent of that idea. The publication become "prior art" with respect to any future patent application which cannot be protected by patent law.



          Of course, if you publish an invention which you discovered independently, that someone else already has a patent application pending for that will be approved the following week, the fact that you published it after the patent was applied for doesn't prevent the person with the pending patent application from having it approved.



          The term "invention" rather than "idea" is what I will use for the remainder of this answer, because there are many ideas which may not be patented, while the lion's share of patentable ideas are appropriately described as "inventions." But, understand that as used in this answer, the term "invention" is being used to refer to the concepts and ideas necessary to make the invention, and not to a particular instance of a product made using those concepts and ideas.



          When an invention is in the public domain, anyone can utilize the invention free of charge without a license. People who use the invention are not even required to acknowledge that you invented or discovered it.



          An invention is also not eligible to be patented if more than a year has elapsed since the first sale of a product using it. But, in that case, the invention can still be protected as a trade secret until it is voluntarily disclosed in some fashion to someone who is not subject to a non-disclosure agreement. (I say voluntary, because the fact that, for example, an unauthorized corporate spy sees the trade secret doesn't end the status of the invention as a trade secret.)



          Some inventions, are effectively publicly disclosed and published the moment that anyone looks at it closely.



          The patentable element of other inventions are invisible to an end user, or to observer of an end user.



          For example, if the invention involves something in the interior of a device, or the invention involves something not visible to the naked eye (e.g. a process for synthesizing an industrial chemical from other chemicals where the chemical formula of the ingredients and end result can't be determined without a microscope or analytical chemistry tests), merely showing someone a product made using the invention will not put it in the public domain.



          It is generally legal to reverse engineer or independently come up with an invention which is merely a trade secret. It is not legal to use a patented invention or process, even if it is not directly copied and is instead reverse engineered or independently discovered, during the lifetime of the patent.



          There is no straightforward way to put an invention into the public domain while retaining any right to acknowledgement that you invented it or otherwise exercise control through a licensing agreement without patenting it.






          share|improve this answer

























          • So as soon as I release my product and there isn't any pending patents related to the product, the idea can no longer be patented and I don't need to worry about being subjected as patent infringement as someone copy it and patent it. Correct?

            – Andrew-at-TW
            Feb 14 at 20:01






          • 3





            @Andrew-at-TW Pretty much. Ideally, you should retain good evidence to prove when you released your product and exactly describing your product. This will make it much easier to defend a patent infringement suit from someone claiming to have a patent on your invention. Patent examiners aren't omniscient and might fail to learn that your invention is already in the public domain and errantly issue a patent, which would then only be invalidated in the defense of a patent infringement lawsuit (or a subsequent PTO review). You should win if sued, but anyone can file a losing lawsuit.

            – ohwilleke
            Feb 14 at 20:06











          • @BruceWayne because ideas are not copyrightable. You publish it and everyone can use it, unless it is patented.

            – Greendrake
            Feb 15 at 4:58











          • @Greendrake ah, haha duh. Thanks.

            – BruceWayne
            Feb 15 at 4:59






          • 1





            @Andrew-at-TW: There certainly are digital timestamping mechanisms, but social media is pretty weak, you'd only use that after the fact if it were the best evidence you had. If you are intentionally acquiring a timestamp, use a proper cross-authenticated digital signature.

            – Ben Voigt
            Feb 16 at 19:51










          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "617"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f37234%2flicensing-an-idea-to-public%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          7














          You are correct that it is quite expensive to patent something in U.S. law.



          Under U.S. patent law, once an idea is publicly published, if no one else has a patent application for the same idea that is pending, the idea enters the public domain and no one can obtain a patent of that idea. The publication become "prior art" with respect to any future patent application which cannot be protected by patent law.



          Of course, if you publish an invention which you discovered independently, that someone else already has a patent application pending for that will be approved the following week, the fact that you published it after the patent was applied for doesn't prevent the person with the pending patent application from having it approved.



          The term "invention" rather than "idea" is what I will use for the remainder of this answer, because there are many ideas which may not be patented, while the lion's share of patentable ideas are appropriately described as "inventions." But, understand that as used in this answer, the term "invention" is being used to refer to the concepts and ideas necessary to make the invention, and not to a particular instance of a product made using those concepts and ideas.



          When an invention is in the public domain, anyone can utilize the invention free of charge without a license. People who use the invention are not even required to acknowledge that you invented or discovered it.



          An invention is also not eligible to be patented if more than a year has elapsed since the first sale of a product using it. But, in that case, the invention can still be protected as a trade secret until it is voluntarily disclosed in some fashion to someone who is not subject to a non-disclosure agreement. (I say voluntary, because the fact that, for example, an unauthorized corporate spy sees the trade secret doesn't end the status of the invention as a trade secret.)



          Some inventions, are effectively publicly disclosed and published the moment that anyone looks at it closely.



          The patentable element of other inventions are invisible to an end user, or to observer of an end user.



          For example, if the invention involves something in the interior of a device, or the invention involves something not visible to the naked eye (e.g. a process for synthesizing an industrial chemical from other chemicals where the chemical formula of the ingredients and end result can't be determined without a microscope or analytical chemistry tests), merely showing someone a product made using the invention will not put it in the public domain.



          It is generally legal to reverse engineer or independently come up with an invention which is merely a trade secret. It is not legal to use a patented invention or process, even if it is not directly copied and is instead reverse engineered or independently discovered, during the lifetime of the patent.



          There is no straightforward way to put an invention into the public domain while retaining any right to acknowledgement that you invented it or otherwise exercise control through a licensing agreement without patenting it.






          share|improve this answer

























          • So as soon as I release my product and there isn't any pending patents related to the product, the idea can no longer be patented and I don't need to worry about being subjected as patent infringement as someone copy it and patent it. Correct?

            – Andrew-at-TW
            Feb 14 at 20:01






          • 3





            @Andrew-at-TW Pretty much. Ideally, you should retain good evidence to prove when you released your product and exactly describing your product. This will make it much easier to defend a patent infringement suit from someone claiming to have a patent on your invention. Patent examiners aren't omniscient and might fail to learn that your invention is already in the public domain and errantly issue a patent, which would then only be invalidated in the defense of a patent infringement lawsuit (or a subsequent PTO review). You should win if sued, but anyone can file a losing lawsuit.

            – ohwilleke
            Feb 14 at 20:06











          • @BruceWayne because ideas are not copyrightable. You publish it and everyone can use it, unless it is patented.

            – Greendrake
            Feb 15 at 4:58











          • @Greendrake ah, haha duh. Thanks.

            – BruceWayne
            Feb 15 at 4:59






          • 1





            @Andrew-at-TW: There certainly are digital timestamping mechanisms, but social media is pretty weak, you'd only use that after the fact if it were the best evidence you had. If you are intentionally acquiring a timestamp, use a proper cross-authenticated digital signature.

            – Ben Voigt
            Feb 16 at 19:51















          7














          You are correct that it is quite expensive to patent something in U.S. law.



          Under U.S. patent law, once an idea is publicly published, if no one else has a patent application for the same idea that is pending, the idea enters the public domain and no one can obtain a patent of that idea. The publication become "prior art" with respect to any future patent application which cannot be protected by patent law.



          Of course, if you publish an invention which you discovered independently, that someone else already has a patent application pending for that will be approved the following week, the fact that you published it after the patent was applied for doesn't prevent the person with the pending patent application from having it approved.



          The term "invention" rather than "idea" is what I will use for the remainder of this answer, because there are many ideas which may not be patented, while the lion's share of patentable ideas are appropriately described as "inventions." But, understand that as used in this answer, the term "invention" is being used to refer to the concepts and ideas necessary to make the invention, and not to a particular instance of a product made using those concepts and ideas.



          When an invention is in the public domain, anyone can utilize the invention free of charge without a license. People who use the invention are not even required to acknowledge that you invented or discovered it.



          An invention is also not eligible to be patented if more than a year has elapsed since the first sale of a product using it. But, in that case, the invention can still be protected as a trade secret until it is voluntarily disclosed in some fashion to someone who is not subject to a non-disclosure agreement. (I say voluntary, because the fact that, for example, an unauthorized corporate spy sees the trade secret doesn't end the status of the invention as a trade secret.)



          Some inventions, are effectively publicly disclosed and published the moment that anyone looks at it closely.



          The patentable element of other inventions are invisible to an end user, or to observer of an end user.



          For example, if the invention involves something in the interior of a device, or the invention involves something not visible to the naked eye (e.g. a process for synthesizing an industrial chemical from other chemicals where the chemical formula of the ingredients and end result can't be determined without a microscope or analytical chemistry tests), merely showing someone a product made using the invention will not put it in the public domain.



          It is generally legal to reverse engineer or independently come up with an invention which is merely a trade secret. It is not legal to use a patented invention or process, even if it is not directly copied and is instead reverse engineered or independently discovered, during the lifetime of the patent.



          There is no straightforward way to put an invention into the public domain while retaining any right to acknowledgement that you invented it or otherwise exercise control through a licensing agreement without patenting it.






          share|improve this answer

























          • So as soon as I release my product and there isn't any pending patents related to the product, the idea can no longer be patented and I don't need to worry about being subjected as patent infringement as someone copy it and patent it. Correct?

            – Andrew-at-TW
            Feb 14 at 20:01






          • 3





            @Andrew-at-TW Pretty much. Ideally, you should retain good evidence to prove when you released your product and exactly describing your product. This will make it much easier to defend a patent infringement suit from someone claiming to have a patent on your invention. Patent examiners aren't omniscient and might fail to learn that your invention is already in the public domain and errantly issue a patent, which would then only be invalidated in the defense of a patent infringement lawsuit (or a subsequent PTO review). You should win if sued, but anyone can file a losing lawsuit.

            – ohwilleke
            Feb 14 at 20:06











          • @BruceWayne because ideas are not copyrightable. You publish it and everyone can use it, unless it is patented.

            – Greendrake
            Feb 15 at 4:58











          • @Greendrake ah, haha duh. Thanks.

            – BruceWayne
            Feb 15 at 4:59






          • 1





            @Andrew-at-TW: There certainly are digital timestamping mechanisms, but social media is pretty weak, you'd only use that after the fact if it were the best evidence you had. If you are intentionally acquiring a timestamp, use a proper cross-authenticated digital signature.

            – Ben Voigt
            Feb 16 at 19:51













          7












          7








          7







          You are correct that it is quite expensive to patent something in U.S. law.



          Under U.S. patent law, once an idea is publicly published, if no one else has a patent application for the same idea that is pending, the idea enters the public domain and no one can obtain a patent of that idea. The publication become "prior art" with respect to any future patent application which cannot be protected by patent law.



          Of course, if you publish an invention which you discovered independently, that someone else already has a patent application pending for that will be approved the following week, the fact that you published it after the patent was applied for doesn't prevent the person with the pending patent application from having it approved.



          The term "invention" rather than "idea" is what I will use for the remainder of this answer, because there are many ideas which may not be patented, while the lion's share of patentable ideas are appropriately described as "inventions." But, understand that as used in this answer, the term "invention" is being used to refer to the concepts and ideas necessary to make the invention, and not to a particular instance of a product made using those concepts and ideas.



          When an invention is in the public domain, anyone can utilize the invention free of charge without a license. People who use the invention are not even required to acknowledge that you invented or discovered it.



          An invention is also not eligible to be patented if more than a year has elapsed since the first sale of a product using it. But, in that case, the invention can still be protected as a trade secret until it is voluntarily disclosed in some fashion to someone who is not subject to a non-disclosure agreement. (I say voluntary, because the fact that, for example, an unauthorized corporate spy sees the trade secret doesn't end the status of the invention as a trade secret.)



          Some inventions, are effectively publicly disclosed and published the moment that anyone looks at it closely.



          The patentable element of other inventions are invisible to an end user, or to observer of an end user.



          For example, if the invention involves something in the interior of a device, or the invention involves something not visible to the naked eye (e.g. a process for synthesizing an industrial chemical from other chemicals where the chemical formula of the ingredients and end result can't be determined without a microscope or analytical chemistry tests), merely showing someone a product made using the invention will not put it in the public domain.



          It is generally legal to reverse engineer or independently come up with an invention which is merely a trade secret. It is not legal to use a patented invention or process, even if it is not directly copied and is instead reverse engineered or independently discovered, during the lifetime of the patent.



          There is no straightforward way to put an invention into the public domain while retaining any right to acknowledgement that you invented it or otherwise exercise control through a licensing agreement without patenting it.






          share|improve this answer















          You are correct that it is quite expensive to patent something in U.S. law.



          Under U.S. patent law, once an idea is publicly published, if no one else has a patent application for the same idea that is pending, the idea enters the public domain and no one can obtain a patent of that idea. The publication become "prior art" with respect to any future patent application which cannot be protected by patent law.



          Of course, if you publish an invention which you discovered independently, that someone else already has a patent application pending for that will be approved the following week, the fact that you published it after the patent was applied for doesn't prevent the person with the pending patent application from having it approved.



          The term "invention" rather than "idea" is what I will use for the remainder of this answer, because there are many ideas which may not be patented, while the lion's share of patentable ideas are appropriately described as "inventions." But, understand that as used in this answer, the term "invention" is being used to refer to the concepts and ideas necessary to make the invention, and not to a particular instance of a product made using those concepts and ideas.



          When an invention is in the public domain, anyone can utilize the invention free of charge without a license. People who use the invention are not even required to acknowledge that you invented or discovered it.



          An invention is also not eligible to be patented if more than a year has elapsed since the first sale of a product using it. But, in that case, the invention can still be protected as a trade secret until it is voluntarily disclosed in some fashion to someone who is not subject to a non-disclosure agreement. (I say voluntary, because the fact that, for example, an unauthorized corporate spy sees the trade secret doesn't end the status of the invention as a trade secret.)



          Some inventions, are effectively publicly disclosed and published the moment that anyone looks at it closely.



          The patentable element of other inventions are invisible to an end user, or to observer of an end user.



          For example, if the invention involves something in the interior of a device, or the invention involves something not visible to the naked eye (e.g. a process for synthesizing an industrial chemical from other chemicals where the chemical formula of the ingredients and end result can't be determined without a microscope or analytical chemistry tests), merely showing someone a product made using the invention will not put it in the public domain.



          It is generally legal to reverse engineer or independently come up with an invention which is merely a trade secret. It is not legal to use a patented invention or process, even if it is not directly copied and is instead reverse engineered or independently discovered, during the lifetime of the patent.



          There is no straightforward way to put an invention into the public domain while retaining any right to acknowledgement that you invented it or otherwise exercise control through a licensing agreement without patenting it.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Feb 14 at 19:58

























          answered Feb 14 at 19:53









          ohwillekeohwilleke

          50.4k257128




          50.4k257128












          • So as soon as I release my product and there isn't any pending patents related to the product, the idea can no longer be patented and I don't need to worry about being subjected as patent infringement as someone copy it and patent it. Correct?

            – Andrew-at-TW
            Feb 14 at 20:01






          • 3





            @Andrew-at-TW Pretty much. Ideally, you should retain good evidence to prove when you released your product and exactly describing your product. This will make it much easier to defend a patent infringement suit from someone claiming to have a patent on your invention. Patent examiners aren't omniscient and might fail to learn that your invention is already in the public domain and errantly issue a patent, which would then only be invalidated in the defense of a patent infringement lawsuit (or a subsequent PTO review). You should win if sued, but anyone can file a losing lawsuit.

            – ohwilleke
            Feb 14 at 20:06











          • @BruceWayne because ideas are not copyrightable. You publish it and everyone can use it, unless it is patented.

            – Greendrake
            Feb 15 at 4:58











          • @Greendrake ah, haha duh. Thanks.

            – BruceWayne
            Feb 15 at 4:59






          • 1





            @Andrew-at-TW: There certainly are digital timestamping mechanisms, but social media is pretty weak, you'd only use that after the fact if it were the best evidence you had. If you are intentionally acquiring a timestamp, use a proper cross-authenticated digital signature.

            – Ben Voigt
            Feb 16 at 19:51

















          • So as soon as I release my product and there isn't any pending patents related to the product, the idea can no longer be patented and I don't need to worry about being subjected as patent infringement as someone copy it and patent it. Correct?

            – Andrew-at-TW
            Feb 14 at 20:01






          • 3





            @Andrew-at-TW Pretty much. Ideally, you should retain good evidence to prove when you released your product and exactly describing your product. This will make it much easier to defend a patent infringement suit from someone claiming to have a patent on your invention. Patent examiners aren't omniscient and might fail to learn that your invention is already in the public domain and errantly issue a patent, which would then only be invalidated in the defense of a patent infringement lawsuit (or a subsequent PTO review). You should win if sued, but anyone can file a losing lawsuit.

            – ohwilleke
            Feb 14 at 20:06











          • @BruceWayne because ideas are not copyrightable. You publish it and everyone can use it, unless it is patented.

            – Greendrake
            Feb 15 at 4:58











          • @Greendrake ah, haha duh. Thanks.

            – BruceWayne
            Feb 15 at 4:59






          • 1





            @Andrew-at-TW: There certainly are digital timestamping mechanisms, but social media is pretty weak, you'd only use that after the fact if it were the best evidence you had. If you are intentionally acquiring a timestamp, use a proper cross-authenticated digital signature.

            – Ben Voigt
            Feb 16 at 19:51
















          So as soon as I release my product and there isn't any pending patents related to the product, the idea can no longer be patented and I don't need to worry about being subjected as patent infringement as someone copy it and patent it. Correct?

          – Andrew-at-TW
          Feb 14 at 20:01





          So as soon as I release my product and there isn't any pending patents related to the product, the idea can no longer be patented and I don't need to worry about being subjected as patent infringement as someone copy it and patent it. Correct?

          – Andrew-at-TW
          Feb 14 at 20:01




          3




          3





          @Andrew-at-TW Pretty much. Ideally, you should retain good evidence to prove when you released your product and exactly describing your product. This will make it much easier to defend a patent infringement suit from someone claiming to have a patent on your invention. Patent examiners aren't omniscient and might fail to learn that your invention is already in the public domain and errantly issue a patent, which would then only be invalidated in the defense of a patent infringement lawsuit (or a subsequent PTO review). You should win if sued, but anyone can file a losing lawsuit.

          – ohwilleke
          Feb 14 at 20:06





          @Andrew-at-TW Pretty much. Ideally, you should retain good evidence to prove when you released your product and exactly describing your product. This will make it much easier to defend a patent infringement suit from someone claiming to have a patent on your invention. Patent examiners aren't omniscient and might fail to learn that your invention is already in the public domain and errantly issue a patent, which would then only be invalidated in the defense of a patent infringement lawsuit (or a subsequent PTO review). You should win if sued, but anyone can file a losing lawsuit.

          – ohwilleke
          Feb 14 at 20:06













          @BruceWayne because ideas are not copyrightable. You publish it and everyone can use it, unless it is patented.

          – Greendrake
          Feb 15 at 4:58





          @BruceWayne because ideas are not copyrightable. You publish it and everyone can use it, unless it is patented.

          – Greendrake
          Feb 15 at 4:58













          @Greendrake ah, haha duh. Thanks.

          – BruceWayne
          Feb 15 at 4:59





          @Greendrake ah, haha duh. Thanks.

          – BruceWayne
          Feb 15 at 4:59




          1




          1





          @Andrew-at-TW: There certainly are digital timestamping mechanisms, but social media is pretty weak, you'd only use that after the fact if it were the best evidence you had. If you are intentionally acquiring a timestamp, use a proper cross-authenticated digital signature.

          – Ben Voigt
          Feb 16 at 19:51





          @Andrew-at-TW: There certainly are digital timestamping mechanisms, but social media is pretty weak, you'd only use that after the fact if it were the best evidence you had. If you are intentionally acquiring a timestamp, use a proper cross-authenticated digital signature.

          – Ben Voigt
          Feb 16 at 19:51

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Law Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f37234%2flicensing-an-idea-to-public%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown






          Popular posts from this blog

          How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

          Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

          How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?