How to cut off part of a letter

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












14















I want to cut off the very top left part of an uppercase R. I tried using adjustbox, but it cuts off the whole top part, which is not what I want. Here's the MWE, the corresponding output and the desired output.



MWE:



documentclassarticle
usepackageadjustbox
begindocument
adjustboxtrim = 0pt -.5pt 0pt .5pt, clipR
enddocument


Corresponding output:



enter image description here



Desired output:



enter image description here










share|improve this question


























    14















    I want to cut off the very top left part of an uppercase R. I tried using adjustbox, but it cuts off the whole top part, which is not what I want. Here's the MWE, the corresponding output and the desired output.



    MWE:



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageadjustbox
    begindocument
    adjustboxtrim = 0pt -.5pt 0pt .5pt, clipR
    enddocument


    Corresponding output:



    enter image description here



    Desired output:



    enter image description here










    share|improve this question
























      14












      14








      14


      0






      I want to cut off the very top left part of an uppercase R. I tried using adjustbox, but it cuts off the whole top part, which is not what I want. Here's the MWE, the corresponding output and the desired output.



      MWE:



      documentclassarticle
      usepackageadjustbox
      begindocument
      adjustboxtrim = 0pt -.5pt 0pt .5pt, clipR
      enddocument


      Corresponding output:



      enter image description here



      Desired output:



      enter image description here










      share|improve this question














      I want to cut off the very top left part of an uppercase R. I tried using adjustbox, but it cuts off the whole top part, which is not what I want. Here's the MWE, the corresponding output and the desired output.



      MWE:



      documentclassarticle
      usepackageadjustbox
      begindocument
      adjustboxtrim = 0pt -.5pt 0pt .5pt, clipR
      enddocument


      Corresponding output:



      enter image description here



      Desired output:



      enter image description here







      adjustbox






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Feb 13 at 1:05









      noibenoibe

      510113




      510113




















          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          14














          You can do this with adjustbox, but because it can only clip rectangular areas you'll need to create two clippings and place them next to each other.



          I'm using two adjustboxes below: the first just shows the leftmost 0.175em of the “R”, with the top 0.1em cut off, and the second one shows the remainder of the letter.
          I've fboxed the letters to show that their bounding boxes are identical and I've converted the pdf to a png with transparency to demonstrate that I'm not covering anything up :).



          documentclassarticle

          usepackageadjustbox
          newcommand*clippedR%
          adjustboxviewport = 0em -.95em .175em dimexprheight-.1em, clip,set depth=0ptR%
          adjustboxviewport = .175em -.05em width height, clip,set depth=0ptR%


          begindocument

          fboxR
          fboxclippedR

          enddocument



          output




          Note that height, width and depth can be used to refer to the original dimensions of the letter (see the adjustbox documentation) and that dimexpr can be used to perform computations with dimensions (see the etex documentation, §3.5 as of this writing). The % at the end of these lines are necessary because single newlines are normally interpreted as spaces (see this answer).






          share|improve this answer




















          • 2





            The only solution which is not a hack, +1!

            – CarLaTeX
            Feb 13 at 17:52







          • 1





            The only solution that actually clips instead of covers, +1!

            – Pippip19
            Feb 13 at 18:05






          • 1





            Nice answer! I'm just wondering if one could use a unit like em instead of pt to make it independent of the currently employed font size?

            – foo
            Feb 14 at 15:16






          • 1





            @foo You definitely can, and I probably should have. I wasn't thinking as much about creating the symbol as I was thinking about demonstrating how adjustbox can be used.

            – Circumscribe
            Feb 14 at 21:00






          • 2





            @foo: Switched from pt to em, because you're right.

            – Circumscribe
            Feb 14 at 21:27


















          10














          What works with make-up also works for tex: instead of removing the corner of the R, cover it up:



          documentclassstandalone
          usepackagexcolor

          begindocument


          leavevmoderlapRrlapkern-0.02emtextcolorwhiteraisebox0.5emrule0.2em0.25em


          text

          enddocument


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer
































            6














            A possible solution is to simply draw over that corner using tikz:



            documentclassarticle
            usepackagetikz
            % Lengths used to hold Height/Width of `R' in current font
            newlengthuppercaseHeight
            newlengthuppercaseWidth
            % R with a corner missing
            newcommandcutR%
            % Save hieght and width of current R (depends on fontsize)
            settoheightuppercaseHeightR%
            settowidthuppercaseWidthR%
            R% Print R
            % Overlay a white rectangle
            tikz[baseline,overlay] fill [white] % [red] % useful to use a red box when tweaking
            (-uppercaseWidth, 0.8*uppercaseHeight) rectangle ++(0.24*uppercaseWidth, 0.25*uppercaseHeight);

            begindocumentnoindent
            small X cutR X \
            normalsize X cutR X \
            large X cutR X
            enddocument


            Output:
            output



            The values used in the fill command appear to work fairly well for the default font over a range of sizes, but you may want to adjust them to get things looking exactly as intended.






            share|improve this answer























            • thanks. Is it possible to tweak the box so that, if I were to overlay the R with another letter, the box would only cover the R but not the other letter?

              – noibe
              Feb 13 at 12:47











            • Definitely. In fact, it is very easy to modify the cutR command to achieve this. Adding hspace-uppercaseWidthX immediately after the call to tikz (put a % at the end of the tikz command to be sure) for example will result in an X being printed exactly on top of the cut R.

              – Pippip19
              Feb 13 at 14:02



















            6














            documentclassarticle
            usepackagexcolor,stackengine
            begindocument
            stackinsetlt-.1ptcolorwhiterule1.8pt1ptR
            enddocument


            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer






















              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "85"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f474620%2fhow-to-cut-off-part-of-a-letter%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              4 Answers
              4






              active

              oldest

              votes








              4 Answers
              4






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              14














              You can do this with adjustbox, but because it can only clip rectangular areas you'll need to create two clippings and place them next to each other.



              I'm using two adjustboxes below: the first just shows the leftmost 0.175em of the “R”, with the top 0.1em cut off, and the second one shows the remainder of the letter.
              I've fboxed the letters to show that their bounding boxes are identical and I've converted the pdf to a png with transparency to demonstrate that I'm not covering anything up :).



              documentclassarticle

              usepackageadjustbox
              newcommand*clippedR%
              adjustboxviewport = 0em -.95em .175em dimexprheight-.1em, clip,set depth=0ptR%
              adjustboxviewport = .175em -.05em width height, clip,set depth=0ptR%


              begindocument

              fboxR
              fboxclippedR

              enddocument



              output




              Note that height, width and depth can be used to refer to the original dimensions of the letter (see the adjustbox documentation) and that dimexpr can be used to perform computations with dimensions (see the etex documentation, §3.5 as of this writing). The % at the end of these lines are necessary because single newlines are normally interpreted as spaces (see this answer).






              share|improve this answer




















              • 2





                The only solution which is not a hack, +1!

                – CarLaTeX
                Feb 13 at 17:52







              • 1





                The only solution that actually clips instead of covers, +1!

                – Pippip19
                Feb 13 at 18:05






              • 1





                Nice answer! I'm just wondering if one could use a unit like em instead of pt to make it independent of the currently employed font size?

                – foo
                Feb 14 at 15:16






              • 1





                @foo You definitely can, and I probably should have. I wasn't thinking as much about creating the symbol as I was thinking about demonstrating how adjustbox can be used.

                – Circumscribe
                Feb 14 at 21:00






              • 2





                @foo: Switched from pt to em, because you're right.

                – Circumscribe
                Feb 14 at 21:27















              14














              You can do this with adjustbox, but because it can only clip rectangular areas you'll need to create two clippings and place them next to each other.



              I'm using two adjustboxes below: the first just shows the leftmost 0.175em of the “R”, with the top 0.1em cut off, and the second one shows the remainder of the letter.
              I've fboxed the letters to show that their bounding boxes are identical and I've converted the pdf to a png with transparency to demonstrate that I'm not covering anything up :).



              documentclassarticle

              usepackageadjustbox
              newcommand*clippedR%
              adjustboxviewport = 0em -.95em .175em dimexprheight-.1em, clip,set depth=0ptR%
              adjustboxviewport = .175em -.05em width height, clip,set depth=0ptR%


              begindocument

              fboxR
              fboxclippedR

              enddocument



              output




              Note that height, width and depth can be used to refer to the original dimensions of the letter (see the adjustbox documentation) and that dimexpr can be used to perform computations with dimensions (see the etex documentation, §3.5 as of this writing). The % at the end of these lines are necessary because single newlines are normally interpreted as spaces (see this answer).






              share|improve this answer




















              • 2





                The only solution which is not a hack, +1!

                – CarLaTeX
                Feb 13 at 17:52







              • 1





                The only solution that actually clips instead of covers, +1!

                – Pippip19
                Feb 13 at 18:05






              • 1





                Nice answer! I'm just wondering if one could use a unit like em instead of pt to make it independent of the currently employed font size?

                – foo
                Feb 14 at 15:16






              • 1





                @foo You definitely can, and I probably should have. I wasn't thinking as much about creating the symbol as I was thinking about demonstrating how adjustbox can be used.

                – Circumscribe
                Feb 14 at 21:00






              • 2





                @foo: Switched from pt to em, because you're right.

                – Circumscribe
                Feb 14 at 21:27













              14












              14








              14







              You can do this with adjustbox, but because it can only clip rectangular areas you'll need to create two clippings and place them next to each other.



              I'm using two adjustboxes below: the first just shows the leftmost 0.175em of the “R”, with the top 0.1em cut off, and the second one shows the remainder of the letter.
              I've fboxed the letters to show that their bounding boxes are identical and I've converted the pdf to a png with transparency to demonstrate that I'm not covering anything up :).



              documentclassarticle

              usepackageadjustbox
              newcommand*clippedR%
              adjustboxviewport = 0em -.95em .175em dimexprheight-.1em, clip,set depth=0ptR%
              adjustboxviewport = .175em -.05em width height, clip,set depth=0ptR%


              begindocument

              fboxR
              fboxclippedR

              enddocument



              output




              Note that height, width and depth can be used to refer to the original dimensions of the letter (see the adjustbox documentation) and that dimexpr can be used to perform computations with dimensions (see the etex documentation, §3.5 as of this writing). The % at the end of these lines are necessary because single newlines are normally interpreted as spaces (see this answer).






              share|improve this answer















              You can do this with adjustbox, but because it can only clip rectangular areas you'll need to create two clippings and place them next to each other.



              I'm using two adjustboxes below: the first just shows the leftmost 0.175em of the “R”, with the top 0.1em cut off, and the second one shows the remainder of the letter.
              I've fboxed the letters to show that their bounding boxes are identical and I've converted the pdf to a png with transparency to demonstrate that I'm not covering anything up :).



              documentclassarticle

              usepackageadjustbox
              newcommand*clippedR%
              adjustboxviewport = 0em -.95em .175em dimexprheight-.1em, clip,set depth=0ptR%
              adjustboxviewport = .175em -.05em width height, clip,set depth=0ptR%


              begindocument

              fboxR
              fboxclippedR

              enddocument



              output




              Note that height, width and depth can be used to refer to the original dimensions of the letter (see the adjustbox documentation) and that dimexpr can be used to perform computations with dimensions (see the etex documentation, §3.5 as of this writing). The % at the end of these lines are necessary because single newlines are normally interpreted as spaces (see this answer).







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited Feb 14 at 21:52

























              answered Feb 13 at 17:50









              CircumscribeCircumscribe

              7,25121441




              7,25121441







              • 2





                The only solution which is not a hack, +1!

                – CarLaTeX
                Feb 13 at 17:52







              • 1





                The only solution that actually clips instead of covers, +1!

                – Pippip19
                Feb 13 at 18:05






              • 1





                Nice answer! I'm just wondering if one could use a unit like em instead of pt to make it independent of the currently employed font size?

                – foo
                Feb 14 at 15:16






              • 1





                @foo You definitely can, and I probably should have. I wasn't thinking as much about creating the symbol as I was thinking about demonstrating how adjustbox can be used.

                – Circumscribe
                Feb 14 at 21:00






              • 2





                @foo: Switched from pt to em, because you're right.

                – Circumscribe
                Feb 14 at 21:27












              • 2





                The only solution which is not a hack, +1!

                – CarLaTeX
                Feb 13 at 17:52







              • 1





                The only solution that actually clips instead of covers, +1!

                – Pippip19
                Feb 13 at 18:05






              • 1





                Nice answer! I'm just wondering if one could use a unit like em instead of pt to make it independent of the currently employed font size?

                – foo
                Feb 14 at 15:16






              • 1





                @foo You definitely can, and I probably should have. I wasn't thinking as much about creating the symbol as I was thinking about demonstrating how adjustbox can be used.

                – Circumscribe
                Feb 14 at 21:00






              • 2





                @foo: Switched from pt to em, because you're right.

                – Circumscribe
                Feb 14 at 21:27







              2




              2





              The only solution which is not a hack, +1!

              – CarLaTeX
              Feb 13 at 17:52






              The only solution which is not a hack, +1!

              – CarLaTeX
              Feb 13 at 17:52





              1




              1





              The only solution that actually clips instead of covers, +1!

              – Pippip19
              Feb 13 at 18:05





              The only solution that actually clips instead of covers, +1!

              – Pippip19
              Feb 13 at 18:05




              1




              1





              Nice answer! I'm just wondering if one could use a unit like em instead of pt to make it independent of the currently employed font size?

              – foo
              Feb 14 at 15:16





              Nice answer! I'm just wondering if one could use a unit like em instead of pt to make it independent of the currently employed font size?

              – foo
              Feb 14 at 15:16




              1




              1





              @foo You definitely can, and I probably should have. I wasn't thinking as much about creating the symbol as I was thinking about demonstrating how adjustbox can be used.

              – Circumscribe
              Feb 14 at 21:00





              @foo You definitely can, and I probably should have. I wasn't thinking as much about creating the symbol as I was thinking about demonstrating how adjustbox can be used.

              – Circumscribe
              Feb 14 at 21:00




              2




              2





              @foo: Switched from pt to em, because you're right.

              – Circumscribe
              Feb 14 at 21:27





              @foo: Switched from pt to em, because you're right.

              – Circumscribe
              Feb 14 at 21:27











              10














              What works with make-up also works for tex: instead of removing the corner of the R, cover it up:



              documentclassstandalone
              usepackagexcolor

              begindocument


              leavevmoderlapRrlapkern-0.02emtextcolorwhiteraisebox0.5emrule0.2em0.25em


              text

              enddocument


              enter image description here






              share|improve this answer





























                10














                What works with make-up also works for tex: instead of removing the corner of the R, cover it up:



                documentclassstandalone
                usepackagexcolor

                begindocument


                leavevmoderlapRrlapkern-0.02emtextcolorwhiteraisebox0.5emrule0.2em0.25em


                text

                enddocument


                enter image description here






                share|improve this answer



























                  10












                  10








                  10







                  What works with make-up also works for tex: instead of removing the corner of the R, cover it up:



                  documentclassstandalone
                  usepackagexcolor

                  begindocument


                  leavevmoderlapRrlapkern-0.02emtextcolorwhiteraisebox0.5emrule0.2em0.25em


                  text

                  enddocument


                  enter image description here






                  share|improve this answer















                  What works with make-up also works for tex: instead of removing the corner of the R, cover it up:



                  documentclassstandalone
                  usepackagexcolor

                  begindocument


                  leavevmoderlapRrlapkern-0.02emtextcolorwhiteraisebox0.5emrule0.2em0.25em


                  text

                  enddocument


                  enter image description here







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited Feb 13 at 12:53

























                  answered Feb 13 at 9:55









                  foofoo

                  3969




                  3969





















                      6














                      A possible solution is to simply draw over that corner using tikz:



                      documentclassarticle
                      usepackagetikz
                      % Lengths used to hold Height/Width of `R' in current font
                      newlengthuppercaseHeight
                      newlengthuppercaseWidth
                      % R with a corner missing
                      newcommandcutR%
                      % Save hieght and width of current R (depends on fontsize)
                      settoheightuppercaseHeightR%
                      settowidthuppercaseWidthR%
                      R% Print R
                      % Overlay a white rectangle
                      tikz[baseline,overlay] fill [white] % [red] % useful to use a red box when tweaking
                      (-uppercaseWidth, 0.8*uppercaseHeight) rectangle ++(0.24*uppercaseWidth, 0.25*uppercaseHeight);

                      begindocumentnoindent
                      small X cutR X \
                      normalsize X cutR X \
                      large X cutR X
                      enddocument


                      Output:
                      output



                      The values used in the fill command appear to work fairly well for the default font over a range of sizes, but you may want to adjust them to get things looking exactly as intended.






                      share|improve this answer























                      • thanks. Is it possible to tweak the box so that, if I were to overlay the R with another letter, the box would only cover the R but not the other letter?

                        – noibe
                        Feb 13 at 12:47











                      • Definitely. In fact, it is very easy to modify the cutR command to achieve this. Adding hspace-uppercaseWidthX immediately after the call to tikz (put a % at the end of the tikz command to be sure) for example will result in an X being printed exactly on top of the cut R.

                        – Pippip19
                        Feb 13 at 14:02
















                      6














                      A possible solution is to simply draw over that corner using tikz:



                      documentclassarticle
                      usepackagetikz
                      % Lengths used to hold Height/Width of `R' in current font
                      newlengthuppercaseHeight
                      newlengthuppercaseWidth
                      % R with a corner missing
                      newcommandcutR%
                      % Save hieght and width of current R (depends on fontsize)
                      settoheightuppercaseHeightR%
                      settowidthuppercaseWidthR%
                      R% Print R
                      % Overlay a white rectangle
                      tikz[baseline,overlay] fill [white] % [red] % useful to use a red box when tweaking
                      (-uppercaseWidth, 0.8*uppercaseHeight) rectangle ++(0.24*uppercaseWidth, 0.25*uppercaseHeight);

                      begindocumentnoindent
                      small X cutR X \
                      normalsize X cutR X \
                      large X cutR X
                      enddocument


                      Output:
                      output



                      The values used in the fill command appear to work fairly well for the default font over a range of sizes, but you may want to adjust them to get things looking exactly as intended.






                      share|improve this answer























                      • thanks. Is it possible to tweak the box so that, if I were to overlay the R with another letter, the box would only cover the R but not the other letter?

                        – noibe
                        Feb 13 at 12:47











                      • Definitely. In fact, it is very easy to modify the cutR command to achieve this. Adding hspace-uppercaseWidthX immediately after the call to tikz (put a % at the end of the tikz command to be sure) for example will result in an X being printed exactly on top of the cut R.

                        – Pippip19
                        Feb 13 at 14:02














                      6












                      6








                      6







                      A possible solution is to simply draw over that corner using tikz:



                      documentclassarticle
                      usepackagetikz
                      % Lengths used to hold Height/Width of `R' in current font
                      newlengthuppercaseHeight
                      newlengthuppercaseWidth
                      % R with a corner missing
                      newcommandcutR%
                      % Save hieght and width of current R (depends on fontsize)
                      settoheightuppercaseHeightR%
                      settowidthuppercaseWidthR%
                      R% Print R
                      % Overlay a white rectangle
                      tikz[baseline,overlay] fill [white] % [red] % useful to use a red box when tweaking
                      (-uppercaseWidth, 0.8*uppercaseHeight) rectangle ++(0.24*uppercaseWidth, 0.25*uppercaseHeight);

                      begindocumentnoindent
                      small X cutR X \
                      normalsize X cutR X \
                      large X cutR X
                      enddocument


                      Output:
                      output



                      The values used in the fill command appear to work fairly well for the default font over a range of sizes, but you may want to adjust them to get things looking exactly as intended.






                      share|improve this answer













                      A possible solution is to simply draw over that corner using tikz:



                      documentclassarticle
                      usepackagetikz
                      % Lengths used to hold Height/Width of `R' in current font
                      newlengthuppercaseHeight
                      newlengthuppercaseWidth
                      % R with a corner missing
                      newcommandcutR%
                      % Save hieght and width of current R (depends on fontsize)
                      settoheightuppercaseHeightR%
                      settowidthuppercaseWidthR%
                      R% Print R
                      % Overlay a white rectangle
                      tikz[baseline,overlay] fill [white] % [red] % useful to use a red box when tweaking
                      (-uppercaseWidth, 0.8*uppercaseHeight) rectangle ++(0.24*uppercaseWidth, 0.25*uppercaseHeight);

                      begindocumentnoindent
                      small X cutR X \
                      normalsize X cutR X \
                      large X cutR X
                      enddocument


                      Output:
                      output



                      The values used in the fill command appear to work fairly well for the default font over a range of sizes, but you may want to adjust them to get things looking exactly as intended.







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered Feb 13 at 8:54









                      Pippip19Pippip19

                      1,5938




                      1,5938












                      • thanks. Is it possible to tweak the box so that, if I were to overlay the R with another letter, the box would only cover the R but not the other letter?

                        – noibe
                        Feb 13 at 12:47











                      • Definitely. In fact, it is very easy to modify the cutR command to achieve this. Adding hspace-uppercaseWidthX immediately after the call to tikz (put a % at the end of the tikz command to be sure) for example will result in an X being printed exactly on top of the cut R.

                        – Pippip19
                        Feb 13 at 14:02


















                      • thanks. Is it possible to tweak the box so that, if I were to overlay the R with another letter, the box would only cover the R but not the other letter?

                        – noibe
                        Feb 13 at 12:47











                      • Definitely. In fact, it is very easy to modify the cutR command to achieve this. Adding hspace-uppercaseWidthX immediately after the call to tikz (put a % at the end of the tikz command to be sure) for example will result in an X being printed exactly on top of the cut R.

                        – Pippip19
                        Feb 13 at 14:02

















                      thanks. Is it possible to tweak the box so that, if I were to overlay the R with another letter, the box would only cover the R but not the other letter?

                      – noibe
                      Feb 13 at 12:47





                      thanks. Is it possible to tweak the box so that, if I were to overlay the R with another letter, the box would only cover the R but not the other letter?

                      – noibe
                      Feb 13 at 12:47













                      Definitely. In fact, it is very easy to modify the cutR command to achieve this. Adding hspace-uppercaseWidthX immediately after the call to tikz (put a % at the end of the tikz command to be sure) for example will result in an X being printed exactly on top of the cut R.

                      – Pippip19
                      Feb 13 at 14:02






                      Definitely. In fact, it is very easy to modify the cutR command to achieve this. Adding hspace-uppercaseWidthX immediately after the call to tikz (put a % at the end of the tikz command to be sure) for example will result in an X being printed exactly on top of the cut R.

                      – Pippip19
                      Feb 13 at 14:02












                      6














                      documentclassarticle
                      usepackagexcolor,stackengine
                      begindocument
                      stackinsetlt-.1ptcolorwhiterule1.8pt1ptR
                      enddocument


                      enter image description here






                      share|improve this answer



























                        6














                        documentclassarticle
                        usepackagexcolor,stackengine
                        begindocument
                        stackinsetlt-.1ptcolorwhiterule1.8pt1ptR
                        enddocument


                        enter image description here






                        share|improve this answer

























                          6












                          6








                          6







                          documentclassarticle
                          usepackagexcolor,stackengine
                          begindocument
                          stackinsetlt-.1ptcolorwhiterule1.8pt1ptR
                          enddocument


                          enter image description here






                          share|improve this answer













                          documentclassarticle
                          usepackagexcolor,stackengine
                          begindocument
                          stackinsetlt-.1ptcolorwhiterule1.8pt1ptR
                          enddocument


                          enter image description here







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered Feb 13 at 13:02









                          Steven B. SegletesSteven B. Segletes

                          157k9204411




                          157k9204411



























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f474620%2fhow-to-cut-off-part-of-a-letter%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown






                              Popular posts from this blog

                              How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

                              Bahrain

                              Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay