Are disc brake rotors interchangeable between brands?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
I have Tektro HD-R310 brakes, with center lock rims, using the new and only center lock rotors from Tektro TR160-35
Well after 2 months of driving in winter, i already notice some rust on the rotors (and i do clean my bike often)
That never happend on my other bike which i rarely clean with shimano slx + rotors.
So my question would be, can i use better quality shimano rotors with my tektro brake? Only problem i can think of would be the pads type (resin), which needs to be compatible. I'm still on the original pads but will switch to "SwissStop Disc34 RS" after they are worn out.
disc-brake compatibility rotor
add a comment |
I have Tektro HD-R310 brakes, with center lock rims, using the new and only center lock rotors from Tektro TR160-35
Well after 2 months of driving in winter, i already notice some rust on the rotors (and i do clean my bike often)
That never happend on my other bike which i rarely clean with shimano slx + rotors.
So my question would be, can i use better quality shimano rotors with my tektro brake? Only problem i can think of would be the pads type (resin), which needs to be compatible. I'm still on the original pads but will switch to "SwissStop Disc34 RS" after they are worn out.
disc-brake compatibility rotor
add a comment |
I have Tektro HD-R310 brakes, with center lock rims, using the new and only center lock rotors from Tektro TR160-35
Well after 2 months of driving in winter, i already notice some rust on the rotors (and i do clean my bike often)
That never happend on my other bike which i rarely clean with shimano slx + rotors.
So my question would be, can i use better quality shimano rotors with my tektro brake? Only problem i can think of would be the pads type (resin), which needs to be compatible. I'm still on the original pads but will switch to "SwissStop Disc34 RS" after they are worn out.
disc-brake compatibility rotor
I have Tektro HD-R310 brakes, with center lock rims, using the new and only center lock rotors from Tektro TR160-35
Well after 2 months of driving in winter, i already notice some rust on the rotors (and i do clean my bike often)
That never happend on my other bike which i rarely clean with shimano slx + rotors.
So my question would be, can i use better quality shimano rotors with my tektro brake? Only problem i can think of would be the pads type (resin), which needs to be compatible. I'm still on the original pads but will switch to "SwissStop Disc34 RS" after they are worn out.
disc-brake compatibility rotor
disc-brake compatibility rotor
edited Feb 17 at 13:29
smurfy
asked Feb 16 at 14:20
smurfysmurfy
1234
1234
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
tldr: be sure new rotor works with metal pads or get a set of resin pads.
Generally, disk brake rotors of same diameter are thought of as cross-compatible, but there are some edge cases when this might not be true:
Rotor thickness might not be the same across manufacturers and disk brake calipers might be designed with thicker/thinner rotor in mind. Examples: Tektro TR180-16 / TR203-16 has thickness of 1.85mm and TR180-17 / TR203-17 is 2.3mm thick; also, see Lennard Zinn's piece on the subject.
As you already noted, rotor manufacturer might require or recommend to use certain kind of pads. Examples: Shimano SM-RT56 is compatible with resin pads only (literally written on the rotor) while SM-RT64 can work with both resin and metal pads. More exotic rotors might also require a matching set of pads.
Let's put all of the above to your case:
A relevant quote from Zinn's piece:
Shimano rotors are made 1.8mm thick and should be replaced when the
thickness has been reduced to 1.5mm. Since 2010, the 1.5mm minimum recommended rotor thickness has been printed on Shimano rotors.Based on published TRP rotor thickness, I assume TR160-35 is most likely 1.85mm thick. According to Shimano, a 0.05mm thickness difference is in a range of expected rotor wear, as per quote above. So, no problems here.
Tektro HD-R310 comes with "Metal Ceramic Compound" pads. That means the new rotor should either support metal pads (like top of the line SM-RT900) or you should get a set of resin pads if new rotor requires these.
add a comment |
A few rotors say they're not compatible with sintered pads, but apart from that the diameter and mounting type are all you've got to worry abour. Differences in thickness are small enough to deal with by adjusting the pads at most (though there may be a few strange systems out there).
Nearly all rotors are stainless steel and shouldn't rust. The bolts might though, and pad backings can be steel that rusts, so the rotors might be getting stained with rust rather than rusting themselves.
There are many alloys of stainless steel. The harder and stronger ones tend to be less “stainless”.
– Eric Shain
Feb 17 at 0:25
@Eric, there are, but even those shouldn't rust in normal wet riding. I'd expect them to be fine even with salt spray. The exact steel doesn't seem to be routinely specified; my RT66 is described as stainless and the Tektro doesn't even give that much detail
– Chris H
Feb 17 at 7:25
1
The main body seems to not actually rust, but the engravings and around the bolts holding rotor itself on the center lock ring have some rust.
– smurfy
Feb 17 at 12:55
@smurfy You should be able to replace the bolts with stainless versions.
– Eric Shain
Feb 17 at 15:43
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "126"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbicycles.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f59375%2fare-disc-brake-rotors-interchangeable-between-brands%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
tldr: be sure new rotor works with metal pads or get a set of resin pads.
Generally, disk brake rotors of same diameter are thought of as cross-compatible, but there are some edge cases when this might not be true:
Rotor thickness might not be the same across manufacturers and disk brake calipers might be designed with thicker/thinner rotor in mind. Examples: Tektro TR180-16 / TR203-16 has thickness of 1.85mm and TR180-17 / TR203-17 is 2.3mm thick; also, see Lennard Zinn's piece on the subject.
As you already noted, rotor manufacturer might require or recommend to use certain kind of pads. Examples: Shimano SM-RT56 is compatible with resin pads only (literally written on the rotor) while SM-RT64 can work with both resin and metal pads. More exotic rotors might also require a matching set of pads.
Let's put all of the above to your case:
A relevant quote from Zinn's piece:
Shimano rotors are made 1.8mm thick and should be replaced when the
thickness has been reduced to 1.5mm. Since 2010, the 1.5mm minimum recommended rotor thickness has been printed on Shimano rotors.Based on published TRP rotor thickness, I assume TR160-35 is most likely 1.85mm thick. According to Shimano, a 0.05mm thickness difference is in a range of expected rotor wear, as per quote above. So, no problems here.
Tektro HD-R310 comes with "Metal Ceramic Compound" pads. That means the new rotor should either support metal pads (like top of the line SM-RT900) or you should get a set of resin pads if new rotor requires these.
add a comment |
tldr: be sure new rotor works with metal pads or get a set of resin pads.
Generally, disk brake rotors of same diameter are thought of as cross-compatible, but there are some edge cases when this might not be true:
Rotor thickness might not be the same across manufacturers and disk brake calipers might be designed with thicker/thinner rotor in mind. Examples: Tektro TR180-16 / TR203-16 has thickness of 1.85mm and TR180-17 / TR203-17 is 2.3mm thick; also, see Lennard Zinn's piece on the subject.
As you already noted, rotor manufacturer might require or recommend to use certain kind of pads. Examples: Shimano SM-RT56 is compatible with resin pads only (literally written on the rotor) while SM-RT64 can work with both resin and metal pads. More exotic rotors might also require a matching set of pads.
Let's put all of the above to your case:
A relevant quote from Zinn's piece:
Shimano rotors are made 1.8mm thick and should be replaced when the
thickness has been reduced to 1.5mm. Since 2010, the 1.5mm minimum recommended rotor thickness has been printed on Shimano rotors.Based on published TRP rotor thickness, I assume TR160-35 is most likely 1.85mm thick. According to Shimano, a 0.05mm thickness difference is in a range of expected rotor wear, as per quote above. So, no problems here.
Tektro HD-R310 comes with "Metal Ceramic Compound" pads. That means the new rotor should either support metal pads (like top of the line SM-RT900) or you should get a set of resin pads if new rotor requires these.
add a comment |
tldr: be sure new rotor works with metal pads or get a set of resin pads.
Generally, disk brake rotors of same diameter are thought of as cross-compatible, but there are some edge cases when this might not be true:
Rotor thickness might not be the same across manufacturers and disk brake calipers might be designed with thicker/thinner rotor in mind. Examples: Tektro TR180-16 / TR203-16 has thickness of 1.85mm and TR180-17 / TR203-17 is 2.3mm thick; also, see Lennard Zinn's piece on the subject.
As you already noted, rotor manufacturer might require or recommend to use certain kind of pads. Examples: Shimano SM-RT56 is compatible with resin pads only (literally written on the rotor) while SM-RT64 can work with both resin and metal pads. More exotic rotors might also require a matching set of pads.
Let's put all of the above to your case:
A relevant quote from Zinn's piece:
Shimano rotors are made 1.8mm thick and should be replaced when the
thickness has been reduced to 1.5mm. Since 2010, the 1.5mm minimum recommended rotor thickness has been printed on Shimano rotors.Based on published TRP rotor thickness, I assume TR160-35 is most likely 1.85mm thick. According to Shimano, a 0.05mm thickness difference is in a range of expected rotor wear, as per quote above. So, no problems here.
Tektro HD-R310 comes with "Metal Ceramic Compound" pads. That means the new rotor should either support metal pads (like top of the line SM-RT900) or you should get a set of resin pads if new rotor requires these.
tldr: be sure new rotor works with metal pads or get a set of resin pads.
Generally, disk brake rotors of same diameter are thought of as cross-compatible, but there are some edge cases when this might not be true:
Rotor thickness might not be the same across manufacturers and disk brake calipers might be designed with thicker/thinner rotor in mind. Examples: Tektro TR180-16 / TR203-16 has thickness of 1.85mm and TR180-17 / TR203-17 is 2.3mm thick; also, see Lennard Zinn's piece on the subject.
As you already noted, rotor manufacturer might require or recommend to use certain kind of pads. Examples: Shimano SM-RT56 is compatible with resin pads only (literally written on the rotor) while SM-RT64 can work with both resin and metal pads. More exotic rotors might also require a matching set of pads.
Let's put all of the above to your case:
A relevant quote from Zinn's piece:
Shimano rotors are made 1.8mm thick and should be replaced when the
thickness has been reduced to 1.5mm. Since 2010, the 1.5mm minimum recommended rotor thickness has been printed on Shimano rotors.Based on published TRP rotor thickness, I assume TR160-35 is most likely 1.85mm thick. According to Shimano, a 0.05mm thickness difference is in a range of expected rotor wear, as per quote above. So, no problems here.
Tektro HD-R310 comes with "Metal Ceramic Compound" pads. That means the new rotor should either support metal pads (like top of the line SM-RT900) or you should get a set of resin pads if new rotor requires these.
answered Feb 16 at 15:39
Klaster_1Klaster_1
4,34511535
4,34511535
add a comment |
add a comment |
A few rotors say they're not compatible with sintered pads, but apart from that the diameter and mounting type are all you've got to worry abour. Differences in thickness are small enough to deal with by adjusting the pads at most (though there may be a few strange systems out there).
Nearly all rotors are stainless steel and shouldn't rust. The bolts might though, and pad backings can be steel that rusts, so the rotors might be getting stained with rust rather than rusting themselves.
There are many alloys of stainless steel. The harder and stronger ones tend to be less “stainless”.
– Eric Shain
Feb 17 at 0:25
@Eric, there are, but even those shouldn't rust in normal wet riding. I'd expect them to be fine even with salt spray. The exact steel doesn't seem to be routinely specified; my RT66 is described as stainless and the Tektro doesn't even give that much detail
– Chris H
Feb 17 at 7:25
1
The main body seems to not actually rust, but the engravings and around the bolts holding rotor itself on the center lock ring have some rust.
– smurfy
Feb 17 at 12:55
@smurfy You should be able to replace the bolts with stainless versions.
– Eric Shain
Feb 17 at 15:43
add a comment |
A few rotors say they're not compatible with sintered pads, but apart from that the diameter and mounting type are all you've got to worry abour. Differences in thickness are small enough to deal with by adjusting the pads at most (though there may be a few strange systems out there).
Nearly all rotors are stainless steel and shouldn't rust. The bolts might though, and pad backings can be steel that rusts, so the rotors might be getting stained with rust rather than rusting themselves.
There are many alloys of stainless steel. The harder and stronger ones tend to be less “stainless”.
– Eric Shain
Feb 17 at 0:25
@Eric, there are, but even those shouldn't rust in normal wet riding. I'd expect them to be fine even with salt spray. The exact steel doesn't seem to be routinely specified; my RT66 is described as stainless and the Tektro doesn't even give that much detail
– Chris H
Feb 17 at 7:25
1
The main body seems to not actually rust, but the engravings and around the bolts holding rotor itself on the center lock ring have some rust.
– smurfy
Feb 17 at 12:55
@smurfy You should be able to replace the bolts with stainless versions.
– Eric Shain
Feb 17 at 15:43
add a comment |
A few rotors say they're not compatible with sintered pads, but apart from that the diameter and mounting type are all you've got to worry abour. Differences in thickness are small enough to deal with by adjusting the pads at most (though there may be a few strange systems out there).
Nearly all rotors are stainless steel and shouldn't rust. The bolts might though, and pad backings can be steel that rusts, so the rotors might be getting stained with rust rather than rusting themselves.
A few rotors say they're not compatible with sintered pads, but apart from that the diameter and mounting type are all you've got to worry abour. Differences in thickness are small enough to deal with by adjusting the pads at most (though there may be a few strange systems out there).
Nearly all rotors are stainless steel and shouldn't rust. The bolts might though, and pad backings can be steel that rusts, so the rotors might be getting stained with rust rather than rusting themselves.
answered Feb 16 at 15:25
Chris HChris H
23.8k138105
23.8k138105
There are many alloys of stainless steel. The harder and stronger ones tend to be less “stainless”.
– Eric Shain
Feb 17 at 0:25
@Eric, there are, but even those shouldn't rust in normal wet riding. I'd expect them to be fine even with salt spray. The exact steel doesn't seem to be routinely specified; my RT66 is described as stainless and the Tektro doesn't even give that much detail
– Chris H
Feb 17 at 7:25
1
The main body seems to not actually rust, but the engravings and around the bolts holding rotor itself on the center lock ring have some rust.
– smurfy
Feb 17 at 12:55
@smurfy You should be able to replace the bolts with stainless versions.
– Eric Shain
Feb 17 at 15:43
add a comment |
There are many alloys of stainless steel. The harder and stronger ones tend to be less “stainless”.
– Eric Shain
Feb 17 at 0:25
@Eric, there are, but even those shouldn't rust in normal wet riding. I'd expect them to be fine even with salt spray. The exact steel doesn't seem to be routinely specified; my RT66 is described as stainless and the Tektro doesn't even give that much detail
– Chris H
Feb 17 at 7:25
1
The main body seems to not actually rust, but the engravings and around the bolts holding rotor itself on the center lock ring have some rust.
– smurfy
Feb 17 at 12:55
@smurfy You should be able to replace the bolts with stainless versions.
– Eric Shain
Feb 17 at 15:43
There are many alloys of stainless steel. The harder and stronger ones tend to be less “stainless”.
– Eric Shain
Feb 17 at 0:25
There are many alloys of stainless steel. The harder and stronger ones tend to be less “stainless”.
– Eric Shain
Feb 17 at 0:25
@Eric, there are, but even those shouldn't rust in normal wet riding. I'd expect them to be fine even with salt spray. The exact steel doesn't seem to be routinely specified; my RT66 is described as stainless and the Tektro doesn't even give that much detail
– Chris H
Feb 17 at 7:25
@Eric, there are, but even those shouldn't rust in normal wet riding. I'd expect them to be fine even with salt spray. The exact steel doesn't seem to be routinely specified; my RT66 is described as stainless and the Tektro doesn't even give that much detail
– Chris H
Feb 17 at 7:25
1
1
The main body seems to not actually rust, but the engravings and around the bolts holding rotor itself on the center lock ring have some rust.
– smurfy
Feb 17 at 12:55
The main body seems to not actually rust, but the engravings and around the bolts holding rotor itself on the center lock ring have some rust.
– smurfy
Feb 17 at 12:55
@smurfy You should be able to replace the bolts with stainless versions.
– Eric Shain
Feb 17 at 15:43
@smurfy You should be able to replace the bolts with stainless versions.
– Eric Shain
Feb 17 at 15:43
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Bicycles Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbicycles.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f59375%2fare-disc-brake-rotors-interchangeable-between-brands%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown