apt, disable signature expiry checks
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
I am trying to use apt with a repo that hasn't been touched in a long time. Unfortunately the gpg key for said repo is expired (I tried updating it from a variety of keyservers, no luck)
I would rather not disable signature checking completely, is there any way to tell apt to verify signatures against expired keys?
apt
add a comment |
I am trying to use apt with a repo that hasn't been touched in a long time. Unfortunately the gpg key for said repo is expired (I tried updating it from a variety of keyservers, no luck)
I would rather not disable signature checking completely, is there any way to tell apt to verify signatures against expired keys?
apt
add a comment |
I am trying to use apt with a repo that hasn't been touched in a long time. Unfortunately the gpg key for said repo is expired (I tried updating it from a variety of keyservers, no luck)
I would rather not disable signature checking completely, is there any way to tell apt to verify signatures against expired keys?
apt
I am trying to use apt with a repo that hasn't been touched in a long time. Unfortunately the gpg key for said repo is expired (I tried updating it from a variety of keyservers, no luck)
I would rather not disable signature checking completely, is there any way to tell apt to verify signatures against expired keys?
apt
apt
asked Feb 21 at 20:24
plugwashplugwash
1,876619
1,876619
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
I have come to the conclusion that there is no way to disable this check in apt, the code that implements the check is the following in methods/gpgv.cc.
if (strncmp(buffer, GNUPGKEYEXPIRED, sizeof(GNUPGKEYEXPIRED)-1) == 0)
if (Debug == true)
std::clog << "Got KEYEXPIRED! " << std::endl;
WorthlessSigners.push_back(string(buffer+sizeof(GNUPGPREFIX)));
And it doesn't seem to be be behind any form of conditional.
However the check can be worked around by using faketime. e.g.
faketime 2017-01-01 apt-get update
Excellent answer for a seemingly poor question. +1
– Rui F Ribeiro
Feb 21 at 21:44
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f502170%2fapt-disable-signature-expiry-checks%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I have come to the conclusion that there is no way to disable this check in apt, the code that implements the check is the following in methods/gpgv.cc.
if (strncmp(buffer, GNUPGKEYEXPIRED, sizeof(GNUPGKEYEXPIRED)-1) == 0)
if (Debug == true)
std::clog << "Got KEYEXPIRED! " << std::endl;
WorthlessSigners.push_back(string(buffer+sizeof(GNUPGPREFIX)));
And it doesn't seem to be be behind any form of conditional.
However the check can be worked around by using faketime. e.g.
faketime 2017-01-01 apt-get update
Excellent answer for a seemingly poor question. +1
– Rui F Ribeiro
Feb 21 at 21:44
add a comment |
I have come to the conclusion that there is no way to disable this check in apt, the code that implements the check is the following in methods/gpgv.cc.
if (strncmp(buffer, GNUPGKEYEXPIRED, sizeof(GNUPGKEYEXPIRED)-1) == 0)
if (Debug == true)
std::clog << "Got KEYEXPIRED! " << std::endl;
WorthlessSigners.push_back(string(buffer+sizeof(GNUPGPREFIX)));
And it doesn't seem to be be behind any form of conditional.
However the check can be worked around by using faketime. e.g.
faketime 2017-01-01 apt-get update
Excellent answer for a seemingly poor question. +1
– Rui F Ribeiro
Feb 21 at 21:44
add a comment |
I have come to the conclusion that there is no way to disable this check in apt, the code that implements the check is the following in methods/gpgv.cc.
if (strncmp(buffer, GNUPGKEYEXPIRED, sizeof(GNUPGKEYEXPIRED)-1) == 0)
if (Debug == true)
std::clog << "Got KEYEXPIRED! " << std::endl;
WorthlessSigners.push_back(string(buffer+sizeof(GNUPGPREFIX)));
And it doesn't seem to be be behind any form of conditional.
However the check can be worked around by using faketime. e.g.
faketime 2017-01-01 apt-get update
I have come to the conclusion that there is no way to disable this check in apt, the code that implements the check is the following in methods/gpgv.cc.
if (strncmp(buffer, GNUPGKEYEXPIRED, sizeof(GNUPGKEYEXPIRED)-1) == 0)
if (Debug == true)
std::clog << "Got KEYEXPIRED! " << std::endl;
WorthlessSigners.push_back(string(buffer+sizeof(GNUPGPREFIX)));
And it doesn't seem to be be behind any form of conditional.
However the check can be worked around by using faketime. e.g.
faketime 2017-01-01 apt-get update
answered Feb 21 at 21:11
plugwashplugwash
1,876619
1,876619
Excellent answer for a seemingly poor question. +1
– Rui F Ribeiro
Feb 21 at 21:44
add a comment |
Excellent answer for a seemingly poor question. +1
– Rui F Ribeiro
Feb 21 at 21:44
Excellent answer for a seemingly poor question. +1
– Rui F Ribeiro
Feb 21 at 21:44
Excellent answer for a seemingly poor question. +1
– Rui F Ribeiro
Feb 21 at 21:44
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f502170%2fapt-disable-signature-expiry-checks%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown