Why might a major chord on piano be voiced Root 5th 3rd Root?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












10















I've seen chord progressions explained using chords looking like this.
https://www.musictheory.net/lessons/55



Enter image description here



Why is there this voicing over, say, just a Root 3rd and 5th? Is it just that it sounds better?










share|improve this question




























    10















    I've seen chord progressions explained using chords looking like this.
    https://www.musictheory.net/lessons/55



    Enter image description here



    Why is there this voicing over, say, just a Root 3rd and 5th? Is it just that it sounds better?










    share|improve this question


























      10












      10








      10


      1






      I've seen chord progressions explained using chords looking like this.
      https://www.musictheory.net/lessons/55



      Enter image description here



      Why is there this voicing over, say, just a Root 3rd and 5th? Is it just that it sounds better?










      share|improve this question
















      I've seen chord progressions explained using chords looking like this.
      https://www.musictheory.net/lessons/55



      Enter image description here



      Why is there this voicing over, say, just a Root 3rd and 5th? Is it just that it sounds better?







      chords






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Feb 1 at 11:25









      Peter Mortensen

      1486




      1486










      asked Jan 31 at 23:20









      BrandonBrandon

      1026




      1026




















          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          29














          It doesn't sound inherently better or worse than the narrow root-3rd-5th voicing, just different. Somewhat palpably, a narrow-voiced chord will tend to sound intimate, focused, unitary, whereas a wide voicing will sound more open, dreamy or adventurous.



          But the reason for a given voicing of one chord can usually not be reduced to just its sound as such, but to the musical context. In particular if you use only narrow chords in root position, you'll inevitably have a lot of big jumps in parallel movement. This can be used as a stylistic element; some guitarists just slide around one chord shape over the neck all of the time. But it sounds rather raw and unsophisticated.



          What I mean is this: to play a progression like - - - with all narrow root-position chords, you need to do something like



          X:1
          L:1/2
          M:C
          K:C
          %%score T1
          V:T1 clef=treble
          % 1
          [V:T1] [CEG] [FAc] | [GBd] [ceg]


          Note that the “average pitch” is completely different in each chord, giving a pretty jumpy sound. OTOH, there's not really a lot of variation of any more subtle, interesting kind.



          Classical music and many styles after it strongly avoids this kind of parallel movement. In classical music, harmony isn't just understood as sequencing of chords but as a particular form of counterpoint between individual melodic voices. And this generally strives for smooth transitions with not too big jumps in each voice (unless as a deliberate effect), and tends to prefer contrary motion to parallel motion to “unglue” the voices. This is quite hard to do with only narrow voicings. So classically, the - - - progression would more likely be rendered something like



          X:1
          L:1/2
          M:C
          K:C
          %%score T1 B1
          V:T1 clef=treble
          V:B1 clef=bass
          % 1
          [V:T1] [EG] [FA] | [DB] [Ec]
          [V:B1] C F, | G, C,


          Much more coherent. (Notice that the F and final C chords don't include a fifth here; that is often not possible with only three voices in common-practice voice leading.)






          share|improve this answer




















          • 1





            “In classical music, harmony isn't just understood as sequencing of chords but as a particular form of counterpoint between individual melodic voices.” That's so well-put! And so little understood… That sort of music isn't a sequence of chords, so much as a combination of parts, each with its own sequence of notes, and the way that chords arise from them. (If I had time, a diagram would help explain this.)

            – gidds
            Feb 1 at 11:05











          • Can you explain what you mean by parallel movement?

            – Brandon
            Feb 1 at 22:25











          • @Brandon I added a simple example.

            – leftaroundabout
            Feb 2 at 0:13











          • Wonderful! One way to demonstrate the idea would be to have three different human voices or three different instruments on the voices: then even an untrained ear could more easily distinguish the voices, and already this thought experiment without actual listening may help understanding how big a difference it makes.

            – JiK
            Feb 2 at 0:53






          • 1





            I guess you could say my thinking on chords was a tad narrow... Bad pun, I know, but the only way I could say it

            – Brandon
            Feb 2 at 1:39


















          7














          There are probably countless reasons why you might choose to voice a chord this way; some which come to mind are:



          1. Intervals like the third sometimes sound a bit muddy in the bass register, therefore one might wish to have more space between the root and the third. See this question for more detail.



          2. It may arise due to the needs of proper voice leading. Depending on what comes before and after this chord, this voicing may well make for the smoothest/most pleasing transition.



          3. These kinds of voicings are also common in Chorale harmonizations (examples) which are commonly used as a tool for teaching harmony and voice leading (see above), which might be what that lesson is setting you up for. Chorale harmonizations are often written on piano staves (and played on keyboard instruments), but ultimately originate as vocal music which leads to making slightly different choices than one would make in music written with a keyboard instrument in mind.



          4. As you say, one might feel that it sounds better. The most important factor when describing chord voicings is generally the bass note, as it determines which inversion is being played, but there's generally more leeway in the placement of the upper intervals. This is often determined by wanting to have a certain note in the top (i.e. the melody) voice. It may also be said that adding doublings of the root (and to a lesser extent the fifth) tend to add "fullness" to the chord without affecting its function or overall character too much.



          You should try experimenting with different voicings yourself and see how different ways of arranging the intervals sound to you. Music would be quite boring after all if every chord was arranged strictly in ascending order from the root.






          share|improve this answer
































            2














            There are already some good answers here, but since you ask specifically about piano, it's worth observing that this voicing fits perfectly under the hands and will be found in the literature countless times.






            share|improve this answer






























              0














              Yes, they might sound better



              The timbre or tone quality of an instrument comes from the overtones or harmonic series that accompanies the fundamental note (the played note). Your hearing range impacts what overtones you can hear. When you play two notes together, there is some degree of dissonance, based on the notes and their respective overtones, and the range in which you can perceive them. An octave shares the most overtones, so has the least accompanying disonnance. Then the fifth, then the fourth, then the third, and so on, with the most dissonant being a minor second, assuming a 12 tone chromatic scale. These disonances are more pronounced in the lower register because you can perceive more of the overtones associated with each note. Thus it is common in piano music to write a chord with less dissonant intervals in the lower register.



              It also may be written with a particular voicing for other reasons. For instance, to make it easier to play or to leave counterpoint a note open in the lead.






              share|improve this answer






















                Your Answer








                StackExchange.ready(function()
                var channelOptions =
                tags: "".split(" "),
                id: "240"
                ;
                initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
                // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
                StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
                createEditor();
                );

                else
                createEditor();

                );

                function createEditor()
                StackExchange.prepareEditor(
                heartbeatType: 'answer',
                autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
                convertImagesToLinks: false,
                noModals: true,
                showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                reputationToPostImages: null,
                bindNavPrevention: true,
                postfix: "",
                imageUploader:
                brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                allowUrls: true
                ,
                noCode: true, onDemand: true,
                discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                );



                );













                draft saved

                draft discarded


















                StackExchange.ready(
                function ()
                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f79474%2fwhy-might-a-major-chord-on-piano-be-voiced-root-5th-3rd-root%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                );

                Post as a guest















                Required, but never shown

























                4 Answers
                4






                active

                oldest

                votes








                4 Answers
                4






                active

                oldest

                votes









                active

                oldest

                votes






                active

                oldest

                votes









                29














                It doesn't sound inherently better or worse than the narrow root-3rd-5th voicing, just different. Somewhat palpably, a narrow-voiced chord will tend to sound intimate, focused, unitary, whereas a wide voicing will sound more open, dreamy or adventurous.



                But the reason for a given voicing of one chord can usually not be reduced to just its sound as such, but to the musical context. In particular if you use only narrow chords in root position, you'll inevitably have a lot of big jumps in parallel movement. This can be used as a stylistic element; some guitarists just slide around one chord shape over the neck all of the time. But it sounds rather raw and unsophisticated.



                What I mean is this: to play a progression like - - - with all narrow root-position chords, you need to do something like



                X:1
                L:1/2
                M:C
                K:C
                %%score T1
                V:T1 clef=treble
                % 1
                [V:T1] [CEG] [FAc] | [GBd] [ceg]


                Note that the “average pitch” is completely different in each chord, giving a pretty jumpy sound. OTOH, there's not really a lot of variation of any more subtle, interesting kind.



                Classical music and many styles after it strongly avoids this kind of parallel movement. In classical music, harmony isn't just understood as sequencing of chords but as a particular form of counterpoint between individual melodic voices. And this generally strives for smooth transitions with not too big jumps in each voice (unless as a deliberate effect), and tends to prefer contrary motion to parallel motion to “unglue” the voices. This is quite hard to do with only narrow voicings. So classically, the - - - progression would more likely be rendered something like



                X:1
                L:1/2
                M:C
                K:C
                %%score T1 B1
                V:T1 clef=treble
                V:B1 clef=bass
                % 1
                [V:T1] [EG] [FA] | [DB] [Ec]
                [V:B1] C F, | G, C,


                Much more coherent. (Notice that the F and final C chords don't include a fifth here; that is often not possible with only three voices in common-practice voice leading.)






                share|improve this answer




















                • 1





                  “In classical music, harmony isn't just understood as sequencing of chords but as a particular form of counterpoint between individual melodic voices.” That's so well-put! And so little understood… That sort of music isn't a sequence of chords, so much as a combination of parts, each with its own sequence of notes, and the way that chords arise from them. (If I had time, a diagram would help explain this.)

                  – gidds
                  Feb 1 at 11:05











                • Can you explain what you mean by parallel movement?

                  – Brandon
                  Feb 1 at 22:25











                • @Brandon I added a simple example.

                  – leftaroundabout
                  Feb 2 at 0:13











                • Wonderful! One way to demonstrate the idea would be to have three different human voices or three different instruments on the voices: then even an untrained ear could more easily distinguish the voices, and already this thought experiment without actual listening may help understanding how big a difference it makes.

                  – JiK
                  Feb 2 at 0:53






                • 1





                  I guess you could say my thinking on chords was a tad narrow... Bad pun, I know, but the only way I could say it

                  – Brandon
                  Feb 2 at 1:39















                29














                It doesn't sound inherently better or worse than the narrow root-3rd-5th voicing, just different. Somewhat palpably, a narrow-voiced chord will tend to sound intimate, focused, unitary, whereas a wide voicing will sound more open, dreamy or adventurous.



                But the reason for a given voicing of one chord can usually not be reduced to just its sound as such, but to the musical context. In particular if you use only narrow chords in root position, you'll inevitably have a lot of big jumps in parallel movement. This can be used as a stylistic element; some guitarists just slide around one chord shape over the neck all of the time. But it sounds rather raw and unsophisticated.



                What I mean is this: to play a progression like - - - with all narrow root-position chords, you need to do something like



                X:1
                L:1/2
                M:C
                K:C
                %%score T1
                V:T1 clef=treble
                % 1
                [V:T1] [CEG] [FAc] | [GBd] [ceg]


                Note that the “average pitch” is completely different in each chord, giving a pretty jumpy sound. OTOH, there's not really a lot of variation of any more subtle, interesting kind.



                Classical music and many styles after it strongly avoids this kind of parallel movement. In classical music, harmony isn't just understood as sequencing of chords but as a particular form of counterpoint between individual melodic voices. And this generally strives for smooth transitions with not too big jumps in each voice (unless as a deliberate effect), and tends to prefer contrary motion to parallel motion to “unglue” the voices. This is quite hard to do with only narrow voicings. So classically, the - - - progression would more likely be rendered something like



                X:1
                L:1/2
                M:C
                K:C
                %%score T1 B1
                V:T1 clef=treble
                V:B1 clef=bass
                % 1
                [V:T1] [EG] [FA] | [DB] [Ec]
                [V:B1] C F, | G, C,


                Much more coherent. (Notice that the F and final C chords don't include a fifth here; that is often not possible with only three voices in common-practice voice leading.)






                share|improve this answer




















                • 1





                  “In classical music, harmony isn't just understood as sequencing of chords but as a particular form of counterpoint between individual melodic voices.” That's so well-put! And so little understood… That sort of music isn't a sequence of chords, so much as a combination of parts, each with its own sequence of notes, and the way that chords arise from them. (If I had time, a diagram would help explain this.)

                  – gidds
                  Feb 1 at 11:05











                • Can you explain what you mean by parallel movement?

                  – Brandon
                  Feb 1 at 22:25











                • @Brandon I added a simple example.

                  – leftaroundabout
                  Feb 2 at 0:13











                • Wonderful! One way to demonstrate the idea would be to have three different human voices or three different instruments on the voices: then even an untrained ear could more easily distinguish the voices, and already this thought experiment without actual listening may help understanding how big a difference it makes.

                  – JiK
                  Feb 2 at 0:53






                • 1





                  I guess you could say my thinking on chords was a tad narrow... Bad pun, I know, but the only way I could say it

                  – Brandon
                  Feb 2 at 1:39













                29












                29








                29







                It doesn't sound inherently better or worse than the narrow root-3rd-5th voicing, just different. Somewhat palpably, a narrow-voiced chord will tend to sound intimate, focused, unitary, whereas a wide voicing will sound more open, dreamy or adventurous.



                But the reason for a given voicing of one chord can usually not be reduced to just its sound as such, but to the musical context. In particular if you use only narrow chords in root position, you'll inevitably have a lot of big jumps in parallel movement. This can be used as a stylistic element; some guitarists just slide around one chord shape over the neck all of the time. But it sounds rather raw and unsophisticated.



                What I mean is this: to play a progression like - - - with all narrow root-position chords, you need to do something like



                X:1
                L:1/2
                M:C
                K:C
                %%score T1
                V:T1 clef=treble
                % 1
                [V:T1] [CEG] [FAc] | [GBd] [ceg]


                Note that the “average pitch” is completely different in each chord, giving a pretty jumpy sound. OTOH, there's not really a lot of variation of any more subtle, interesting kind.



                Classical music and many styles after it strongly avoids this kind of parallel movement. In classical music, harmony isn't just understood as sequencing of chords but as a particular form of counterpoint between individual melodic voices. And this generally strives for smooth transitions with not too big jumps in each voice (unless as a deliberate effect), and tends to prefer contrary motion to parallel motion to “unglue” the voices. This is quite hard to do with only narrow voicings. So classically, the - - - progression would more likely be rendered something like



                X:1
                L:1/2
                M:C
                K:C
                %%score T1 B1
                V:T1 clef=treble
                V:B1 clef=bass
                % 1
                [V:T1] [EG] [FA] | [DB] [Ec]
                [V:B1] C F, | G, C,


                Much more coherent. (Notice that the F and final C chords don't include a fifth here; that is often not possible with only three voices in common-practice voice leading.)






                share|improve this answer















                It doesn't sound inherently better or worse than the narrow root-3rd-5th voicing, just different. Somewhat palpably, a narrow-voiced chord will tend to sound intimate, focused, unitary, whereas a wide voicing will sound more open, dreamy or adventurous.



                But the reason for a given voicing of one chord can usually not be reduced to just its sound as such, but to the musical context. In particular if you use only narrow chords in root position, you'll inevitably have a lot of big jumps in parallel movement. This can be used as a stylistic element; some guitarists just slide around one chord shape over the neck all of the time. But it sounds rather raw and unsophisticated.



                What I mean is this: to play a progression like - - - with all narrow root-position chords, you need to do something like



                X:1
                L:1/2
                M:C
                K:C
                %%score T1
                V:T1 clef=treble
                % 1
                [V:T1] [CEG] [FAc] | [GBd] [ceg]


                Note that the “average pitch” is completely different in each chord, giving a pretty jumpy sound. OTOH, there's not really a lot of variation of any more subtle, interesting kind.



                Classical music and many styles after it strongly avoids this kind of parallel movement. In classical music, harmony isn't just understood as sequencing of chords but as a particular form of counterpoint between individual melodic voices. And this generally strives for smooth transitions with not too big jumps in each voice (unless as a deliberate effect), and tends to prefer contrary motion to parallel motion to “unglue” the voices. This is quite hard to do with only narrow voicings. So classically, the - - - progression would more likely be rendered something like



                X:1
                L:1/2
                M:C
                K:C
                %%score T1 B1
                V:T1 clef=treble
                V:B1 clef=bass
                % 1
                [V:T1] [EG] [FA] | [DB] [Ec]
                [V:B1] C F, | G, C,


                Much more coherent. (Notice that the F and final C chords don't include a fifth here; that is often not possible with only three voices in common-practice voice leading.)







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited Feb 2 at 0:06

























                answered Jan 31 at 23:55









                leftaroundaboutleftaroundabout

                19.8k3585




                19.8k3585







                • 1





                  “In classical music, harmony isn't just understood as sequencing of chords but as a particular form of counterpoint between individual melodic voices.” That's so well-put! And so little understood… That sort of music isn't a sequence of chords, so much as a combination of parts, each with its own sequence of notes, and the way that chords arise from them. (If I had time, a diagram would help explain this.)

                  – gidds
                  Feb 1 at 11:05











                • Can you explain what you mean by parallel movement?

                  – Brandon
                  Feb 1 at 22:25











                • @Brandon I added a simple example.

                  – leftaroundabout
                  Feb 2 at 0:13











                • Wonderful! One way to demonstrate the idea would be to have three different human voices or three different instruments on the voices: then even an untrained ear could more easily distinguish the voices, and already this thought experiment without actual listening may help understanding how big a difference it makes.

                  – JiK
                  Feb 2 at 0:53






                • 1





                  I guess you could say my thinking on chords was a tad narrow... Bad pun, I know, but the only way I could say it

                  – Brandon
                  Feb 2 at 1:39












                • 1





                  “In classical music, harmony isn't just understood as sequencing of chords but as a particular form of counterpoint between individual melodic voices.” That's so well-put! And so little understood… That sort of music isn't a sequence of chords, so much as a combination of parts, each with its own sequence of notes, and the way that chords arise from them. (If I had time, a diagram would help explain this.)

                  – gidds
                  Feb 1 at 11:05











                • Can you explain what you mean by parallel movement?

                  – Brandon
                  Feb 1 at 22:25











                • @Brandon I added a simple example.

                  – leftaroundabout
                  Feb 2 at 0:13











                • Wonderful! One way to demonstrate the idea would be to have three different human voices or three different instruments on the voices: then even an untrained ear could more easily distinguish the voices, and already this thought experiment without actual listening may help understanding how big a difference it makes.

                  – JiK
                  Feb 2 at 0:53






                • 1





                  I guess you could say my thinking on chords was a tad narrow... Bad pun, I know, but the only way I could say it

                  – Brandon
                  Feb 2 at 1:39







                1




                1





                “In classical music, harmony isn't just understood as sequencing of chords but as a particular form of counterpoint between individual melodic voices.” That's so well-put! And so little understood… That sort of music isn't a sequence of chords, so much as a combination of parts, each with its own sequence of notes, and the way that chords arise from them. (If I had time, a diagram would help explain this.)

                – gidds
                Feb 1 at 11:05





                “In classical music, harmony isn't just understood as sequencing of chords but as a particular form of counterpoint between individual melodic voices.” That's so well-put! And so little understood… That sort of music isn't a sequence of chords, so much as a combination of parts, each with its own sequence of notes, and the way that chords arise from them. (If I had time, a diagram would help explain this.)

                – gidds
                Feb 1 at 11:05













                Can you explain what you mean by parallel movement?

                – Brandon
                Feb 1 at 22:25





                Can you explain what you mean by parallel movement?

                – Brandon
                Feb 1 at 22:25













                @Brandon I added a simple example.

                – leftaroundabout
                Feb 2 at 0:13





                @Brandon I added a simple example.

                – leftaroundabout
                Feb 2 at 0:13













                Wonderful! One way to demonstrate the idea would be to have three different human voices or three different instruments on the voices: then even an untrained ear could more easily distinguish the voices, and already this thought experiment without actual listening may help understanding how big a difference it makes.

                – JiK
                Feb 2 at 0:53





                Wonderful! One way to demonstrate the idea would be to have three different human voices or three different instruments on the voices: then even an untrained ear could more easily distinguish the voices, and already this thought experiment without actual listening may help understanding how big a difference it makes.

                – JiK
                Feb 2 at 0:53




                1




                1





                I guess you could say my thinking on chords was a tad narrow... Bad pun, I know, but the only way I could say it

                – Brandon
                Feb 2 at 1:39





                I guess you could say my thinking on chords was a tad narrow... Bad pun, I know, but the only way I could say it

                – Brandon
                Feb 2 at 1:39











                7














                There are probably countless reasons why you might choose to voice a chord this way; some which come to mind are:



                1. Intervals like the third sometimes sound a bit muddy in the bass register, therefore one might wish to have more space between the root and the third. See this question for more detail.



                2. It may arise due to the needs of proper voice leading. Depending on what comes before and after this chord, this voicing may well make for the smoothest/most pleasing transition.



                3. These kinds of voicings are also common in Chorale harmonizations (examples) which are commonly used as a tool for teaching harmony and voice leading (see above), which might be what that lesson is setting you up for. Chorale harmonizations are often written on piano staves (and played on keyboard instruments), but ultimately originate as vocal music which leads to making slightly different choices than one would make in music written with a keyboard instrument in mind.



                4. As you say, one might feel that it sounds better. The most important factor when describing chord voicings is generally the bass note, as it determines which inversion is being played, but there's generally more leeway in the placement of the upper intervals. This is often determined by wanting to have a certain note in the top (i.e. the melody) voice. It may also be said that adding doublings of the root (and to a lesser extent the fifth) tend to add "fullness" to the chord without affecting its function or overall character too much.



                You should try experimenting with different voicings yourself and see how different ways of arranging the intervals sound to you. Music would be quite boring after all if every chord was arranged strictly in ascending order from the root.






                share|improve this answer





























                  7














                  There are probably countless reasons why you might choose to voice a chord this way; some which come to mind are:



                  1. Intervals like the third sometimes sound a bit muddy in the bass register, therefore one might wish to have more space between the root and the third. See this question for more detail.



                  2. It may arise due to the needs of proper voice leading. Depending on what comes before and after this chord, this voicing may well make for the smoothest/most pleasing transition.



                  3. These kinds of voicings are also common in Chorale harmonizations (examples) which are commonly used as a tool for teaching harmony and voice leading (see above), which might be what that lesson is setting you up for. Chorale harmonizations are often written on piano staves (and played on keyboard instruments), but ultimately originate as vocal music which leads to making slightly different choices than one would make in music written with a keyboard instrument in mind.



                  4. As you say, one might feel that it sounds better. The most important factor when describing chord voicings is generally the bass note, as it determines which inversion is being played, but there's generally more leeway in the placement of the upper intervals. This is often determined by wanting to have a certain note in the top (i.e. the melody) voice. It may also be said that adding doublings of the root (and to a lesser extent the fifth) tend to add "fullness" to the chord without affecting its function or overall character too much.



                  You should try experimenting with different voicings yourself and see how different ways of arranging the intervals sound to you. Music would be quite boring after all if every chord was arranged strictly in ascending order from the root.






                  share|improve this answer



























                    7












                    7








                    7







                    There are probably countless reasons why you might choose to voice a chord this way; some which come to mind are:



                    1. Intervals like the third sometimes sound a bit muddy in the bass register, therefore one might wish to have more space between the root and the third. See this question for more detail.



                    2. It may arise due to the needs of proper voice leading. Depending on what comes before and after this chord, this voicing may well make for the smoothest/most pleasing transition.



                    3. These kinds of voicings are also common in Chorale harmonizations (examples) which are commonly used as a tool for teaching harmony and voice leading (see above), which might be what that lesson is setting you up for. Chorale harmonizations are often written on piano staves (and played on keyboard instruments), but ultimately originate as vocal music which leads to making slightly different choices than one would make in music written with a keyboard instrument in mind.



                    4. As you say, one might feel that it sounds better. The most important factor when describing chord voicings is generally the bass note, as it determines which inversion is being played, but there's generally more leeway in the placement of the upper intervals. This is often determined by wanting to have a certain note in the top (i.e. the melody) voice. It may also be said that adding doublings of the root (and to a lesser extent the fifth) tend to add "fullness" to the chord without affecting its function or overall character too much.



                    You should try experimenting with different voicings yourself and see how different ways of arranging the intervals sound to you. Music would be quite boring after all if every chord was arranged strictly in ascending order from the root.






                    share|improve this answer















                    There are probably countless reasons why you might choose to voice a chord this way; some which come to mind are:



                    1. Intervals like the third sometimes sound a bit muddy in the bass register, therefore one might wish to have more space between the root and the third. See this question for more detail.



                    2. It may arise due to the needs of proper voice leading. Depending on what comes before and after this chord, this voicing may well make for the smoothest/most pleasing transition.



                    3. These kinds of voicings are also common in Chorale harmonizations (examples) which are commonly used as a tool for teaching harmony and voice leading (see above), which might be what that lesson is setting you up for. Chorale harmonizations are often written on piano staves (and played on keyboard instruments), but ultimately originate as vocal music which leads to making slightly different choices than one would make in music written with a keyboard instrument in mind.



                    4. As you say, one might feel that it sounds better. The most important factor when describing chord voicings is generally the bass note, as it determines which inversion is being played, but there's generally more leeway in the placement of the upper intervals. This is often determined by wanting to have a certain note in the top (i.e. the melody) voice. It may also be said that adding doublings of the root (and to a lesser extent the fifth) tend to add "fullness" to the chord without affecting its function or overall character too much.



                    You should try experimenting with different voicings yourself and see how different ways of arranging the intervals sound to you. Music would be quite boring after all if every chord was arranged strictly in ascending order from the root.







                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited Feb 1 at 0:11

























                    answered Jan 31 at 23:54







                    user57228




























                        2














                        There are already some good answers here, but since you ask specifically about piano, it's worth observing that this voicing fits perfectly under the hands and will be found in the literature countless times.






                        share|improve this answer



























                          2














                          There are already some good answers here, but since you ask specifically about piano, it's worth observing that this voicing fits perfectly under the hands and will be found in the literature countless times.






                          share|improve this answer

























                            2












                            2








                            2







                            There are already some good answers here, but since you ask specifically about piano, it's worth observing that this voicing fits perfectly under the hands and will be found in the literature countless times.






                            share|improve this answer













                            There are already some good answers here, but since you ask specifically about piano, it's worth observing that this voicing fits perfectly under the hands and will be found in the literature countless times.







                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered Feb 1 at 19:03









                            dennisdeemsdennisdeems

                            554210




                            554210





















                                0














                                Yes, they might sound better



                                The timbre or tone quality of an instrument comes from the overtones or harmonic series that accompanies the fundamental note (the played note). Your hearing range impacts what overtones you can hear. When you play two notes together, there is some degree of dissonance, based on the notes and their respective overtones, and the range in which you can perceive them. An octave shares the most overtones, so has the least accompanying disonnance. Then the fifth, then the fourth, then the third, and so on, with the most dissonant being a minor second, assuming a 12 tone chromatic scale. These disonances are more pronounced in the lower register because you can perceive more of the overtones associated with each note. Thus it is common in piano music to write a chord with less dissonant intervals in the lower register.



                                It also may be written with a particular voicing for other reasons. For instance, to make it easier to play or to leave counterpoint a note open in the lead.






                                share|improve this answer



























                                  0














                                  Yes, they might sound better



                                  The timbre or tone quality of an instrument comes from the overtones or harmonic series that accompanies the fundamental note (the played note). Your hearing range impacts what overtones you can hear. When you play two notes together, there is some degree of dissonance, based on the notes and their respective overtones, and the range in which you can perceive them. An octave shares the most overtones, so has the least accompanying disonnance. Then the fifth, then the fourth, then the third, and so on, with the most dissonant being a minor second, assuming a 12 tone chromatic scale. These disonances are more pronounced in the lower register because you can perceive more of the overtones associated with each note. Thus it is common in piano music to write a chord with less dissonant intervals in the lower register.



                                  It also may be written with a particular voicing for other reasons. For instance, to make it easier to play or to leave counterpoint a note open in the lead.






                                  share|improve this answer

























                                    0












                                    0








                                    0







                                    Yes, they might sound better



                                    The timbre or tone quality of an instrument comes from the overtones or harmonic series that accompanies the fundamental note (the played note). Your hearing range impacts what overtones you can hear. When you play two notes together, there is some degree of dissonance, based on the notes and their respective overtones, and the range in which you can perceive them. An octave shares the most overtones, so has the least accompanying disonnance. Then the fifth, then the fourth, then the third, and so on, with the most dissonant being a minor second, assuming a 12 tone chromatic scale. These disonances are more pronounced in the lower register because you can perceive more of the overtones associated with each note. Thus it is common in piano music to write a chord with less dissonant intervals in the lower register.



                                    It also may be written with a particular voicing for other reasons. For instance, to make it easier to play or to leave counterpoint a note open in the lead.






                                    share|improve this answer













                                    Yes, they might sound better



                                    The timbre or tone quality of an instrument comes from the overtones or harmonic series that accompanies the fundamental note (the played note). Your hearing range impacts what overtones you can hear. When you play two notes together, there is some degree of dissonance, based on the notes and their respective overtones, and the range in which you can perceive them. An octave shares the most overtones, so has the least accompanying disonnance. Then the fifth, then the fourth, then the third, and so on, with the most dissonant being a minor second, assuming a 12 tone chromatic scale. These disonances are more pronounced in the lower register because you can perceive more of the overtones associated with each note. Thus it is common in piano music to write a chord with less dissonant intervals in the lower register.



                                    It also may be written with a particular voicing for other reasons. For instance, to make it easier to play or to leave counterpoint a note open in the lead.







                                    share|improve this answer












                                    share|improve this answer



                                    share|improve this answer










                                    answered Feb 1 at 18:21









                                    WyrmwoodWyrmwood

                                    1504




                                    1504



























                                        draft saved

                                        draft discarded
















































                                        Thanks for contributing an answer to Music: Practice & Theory Stack Exchange!


                                        • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                        But avoid


                                        • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                        • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                        To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded














                                        StackExchange.ready(
                                        function ()
                                        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f79474%2fwhy-might-a-major-chord-on-piano-be-voiced-root-5th-3rd-root%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                        );

                                        Post as a guest















                                        Required, but never shown





















































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown

































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown






                                        Popular posts from this blog

                                        How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

                                        Bahrain

                                        Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay