How to give the exponent terms in the denominator part of a frac expression more vertical space?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












8















How can I give one line in LaTeX more vertical height so that something like



$fracn^n2^2n * n^n^2$


displays correctly? I mean, how to give the 2 term more vertical displacement, so that it looks like it's above the top n in the term n^n^2 in the denominator?



Note that increasing line spacing doesn't work because LaTeX does not fill the space with the characters. (When I searched for this ability, this was all that came up.)










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    Could you please add a minimal example which reproduces your problem?

    – CarLaTeX
    Feb 1 at 4:13











  • You can add additional space using fboxrule=0pt fbox...

    – John Kormylo
    Feb 1 at 4:22















8















How can I give one line in LaTeX more vertical height so that something like



$fracn^n2^2n * n^n^2$


displays correctly? I mean, how to give the 2 term more vertical displacement, so that it looks like it's above the top n in the term n^n^2 in the denominator?



Note that increasing line spacing doesn't work because LaTeX does not fill the space with the characters. (When I searched for this ability, this was all that came up.)










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    Could you please add a minimal example which reproduces your problem?

    – CarLaTeX
    Feb 1 at 4:13











  • You can add additional space using fboxrule=0pt fbox...

    – John Kormylo
    Feb 1 at 4:22













8












8








8


0






How can I give one line in LaTeX more vertical height so that something like



$fracn^n2^2n * n^n^2$


displays correctly? I mean, how to give the 2 term more vertical displacement, so that it looks like it's above the top n in the term n^n^2 in the denominator?



Note that increasing line spacing doesn't work because LaTeX does not fill the space with the characters. (When I searched for this ability, this was all that came up.)










share|improve this question
















How can I give one line in LaTeX more vertical height so that something like



$fracn^n2^2n * n^n^2$


displays correctly? I mean, how to give the 2 term more vertical displacement, so that it looks like it's above the top n in the term n^n^2 in the denominator?



Note that increasing line spacing doesn't work because LaTeX does not fill the space with the characters. (When I searched for this ability, this was all that came up.)







fractions






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Feb 8 at 7:46









Mico

280k31381770




280k31381770










asked Feb 1 at 4:10









Pro QPro Q

1605




1605







  • 2





    Could you please add a minimal example which reproduces your problem?

    – CarLaTeX
    Feb 1 at 4:13











  • You can add additional space using fboxrule=0pt fbox...

    – John Kormylo
    Feb 1 at 4:22












  • 2





    Could you please add a minimal example which reproduces your problem?

    – CarLaTeX
    Feb 1 at 4:13











  • You can add additional space using fboxrule=0pt fbox...

    – John Kormylo
    Feb 1 at 4:22







2




2





Could you please add a minimal example which reproduces your problem?

– CarLaTeX
Feb 1 at 4:13





Could you please add a minimal example which reproduces your problem?

– CarLaTeX
Feb 1 at 4:13













You can add additional space using fboxrule=0pt fbox...

– John Kormylo
Feb 1 at 4:22





You can add additional space using fboxrule=0pt fbox...

– John Kormylo
Feb 1 at 4:22










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















8














I think the denominator of your frac expression suffers from two issues:



  • a "cramped" look, i.e., the exponents are not raised much above the baseline

  • first- and second-order exponents are raised to (very nearly) the same height

How to remedy these issues?



  • To address the first issue, switch to "uncramped" mode -- see the ufrac macro below.



  • To remedy the second issue, I suggest you switch from n^n^2 to n^n^2. (The two forms are the same, mathematically speaking, but they are quite differnt from a typographic point of view.) That, or use parentheses to visually "enclose" the n^n term.



    Alternatively, consider switching from "standard" frac notation to inline-fraction notation.



Whatever else you do, please don't use the unnecessary * multiplication symbol. If you can't do without an explicit multiplication symbol, do use cdot, not *.



enter image description here



documentclassarticle

%% "uncramped" frac macro:
%% (Source: @egreg [who else?!], https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/337334/5001)
makeatletter
newcommandufrac[2]%
frac#1mathpaletteufrac@den#2
newcommandufrac@den[2]#1#2
makeatother

begindocument
inline math mode, verb+frac+ notation

$fracn^n2^2n * n^n^2 % OP's expression
quad
ufracn^n2^2n n^n^2
quad
ufracn^n2^2n (n^n)^2$

bigskip
display math mode, verb+frac+ notation

smallskip
$displaystyle
fracn^n2^2n n^n^2
quad
ufracn^n2^2n n^n^2
quad
ufracn^n2^2n (n^n)^2$

bigskip
inline-frac notation

smallskip
$n^n/(2^2n n^n^2)
quad
n^n/(2^2n (n^n)^2)$
enddocument





share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    I specially like the 3rd option instead of the first one. We need more parentheses, but we guarantee not to destroy line spacing (and sometines it is visually better). Thanks for showing us the options!

    – manooooh
    Feb 1 at 7:10


















6














Does this go in the right direction?



documentclass[fleqn]article

begindocument
paragraphOriginal:
$fracn^n2^2n * n^n^2$
[fracn^n2^2n * n^n^2]

paragraphProposal:
$fracn^n2^2n * mathstrut n^n^2$
[fracn^n2^2n * mathstrut n^n^2]


paragraphWith brackets:
$fracn^n2^2n * ( n^n)^2$

[fracn^n2^2n * (n^n)^2]

enddocument


enter image description here






share|improve this answer






















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "85"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f472826%2fhow-to-give-the-exponent-terms-in-the-denominator-part-of-a-frac-expression-mor%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    8














    I think the denominator of your frac expression suffers from two issues:



    • a "cramped" look, i.e., the exponents are not raised much above the baseline

    • first- and second-order exponents are raised to (very nearly) the same height

    How to remedy these issues?



    • To address the first issue, switch to "uncramped" mode -- see the ufrac macro below.



    • To remedy the second issue, I suggest you switch from n^n^2 to n^n^2. (The two forms are the same, mathematically speaking, but they are quite differnt from a typographic point of view.) That, or use parentheses to visually "enclose" the n^n term.



      Alternatively, consider switching from "standard" frac notation to inline-fraction notation.



    Whatever else you do, please don't use the unnecessary * multiplication symbol. If you can't do without an explicit multiplication symbol, do use cdot, not *.



    enter image description here



    documentclassarticle

    %% "uncramped" frac macro:
    %% (Source: @egreg [who else?!], https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/337334/5001)
    makeatletter
    newcommandufrac[2]%
    frac#1mathpaletteufrac@den#2
    newcommandufrac@den[2]#1#2
    makeatother

    begindocument
    inline math mode, verb+frac+ notation

    $fracn^n2^2n * n^n^2 % OP's expression
    quad
    ufracn^n2^2n n^n^2
    quad
    ufracn^n2^2n (n^n)^2$

    bigskip
    display math mode, verb+frac+ notation

    smallskip
    $displaystyle
    fracn^n2^2n n^n^2
    quad
    ufracn^n2^2n n^n^2
    quad
    ufracn^n2^2n (n^n)^2$

    bigskip
    inline-frac notation

    smallskip
    $n^n/(2^2n n^n^2)
    quad
    n^n/(2^2n (n^n)^2)$
    enddocument





    share|improve this answer




















    • 1





      I specially like the 3rd option instead of the first one. We need more parentheses, but we guarantee not to destroy line spacing (and sometines it is visually better). Thanks for showing us the options!

      – manooooh
      Feb 1 at 7:10















    8














    I think the denominator of your frac expression suffers from two issues:



    • a "cramped" look, i.e., the exponents are not raised much above the baseline

    • first- and second-order exponents are raised to (very nearly) the same height

    How to remedy these issues?



    • To address the first issue, switch to "uncramped" mode -- see the ufrac macro below.



    • To remedy the second issue, I suggest you switch from n^n^2 to n^n^2. (The two forms are the same, mathematically speaking, but they are quite differnt from a typographic point of view.) That, or use parentheses to visually "enclose" the n^n term.



      Alternatively, consider switching from "standard" frac notation to inline-fraction notation.



    Whatever else you do, please don't use the unnecessary * multiplication symbol. If you can't do without an explicit multiplication symbol, do use cdot, not *.



    enter image description here



    documentclassarticle

    %% "uncramped" frac macro:
    %% (Source: @egreg [who else?!], https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/337334/5001)
    makeatletter
    newcommandufrac[2]%
    frac#1mathpaletteufrac@den#2
    newcommandufrac@den[2]#1#2
    makeatother

    begindocument
    inline math mode, verb+frac+ notation

    $fracn^n2^2n * n^n^2 % OP's expression
    quad
    ufracn^n2^2n n^n^2
    quad
    ufracn^n2^2n (n^n)^2$

    bigskip
    display math mode, verb+frac+ notation

    smallskip
    $displaystyle
    fracn^n2^2n n^n^2
    quad
    ufracn^n2^2n n^n^2
    quad
    ufracn^n2^2n (n^n)^2$

    bigskip
    inline-frac notation

    smallskip
    $n^n/(2^2n n^n^2)
    quad
    n^n/(2^2n (n^n)^2)$
    enddocument





    share|improve this answer




















    • 1





      I specially like the 3rd option instead of the first one. We need more parentheses, but we guarantee not to destroy line spacing (and sometines it is visually better). Thanks for showing us the options!

      – manooooh
      Feb 1 at 7:10













    8












    8








    8







    I think the denominator of your frac expression suffers from two issues:



    • a "cramped" look, i.e., the exponents are not raised much above the baseline

    • first- and second-order exponents are raised to (very nearly) the same height

    How to remedy these issues?



    • To address the first issue, switch to "uncramped" mode -- see the ufrac macro below.



    • To remedy the second issue, I suggest you switch from n^n^2 to n^n^2. (The two forms are the same, mathematically speaking, but they are quite differnt from a typographic point of view.) That, or use parentheses to visually "enclose" the n^n term.



      Alternatively, consider switching from "standard" frac notation to inline-fraction notation.



    Whatever else you do, please don't use the unnecessary * multiplication symbol. If you can't do without an explicit multiplication symbol, do use cdot, not *.



    enter image description here



    documentclassarticle

    %% "uncramped" frac macro:
    %% (Source: @egreg [who else?!], https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/337334/5001)
    makeatletter
    newcommandufrac[2]%
    frac#1mathpaletteufrac@den#2
    newcommandufrac@den[2]#1#2
    makeatother

    begindocument
    inline math mode, verb+frac+ notation

    $fracn^n2^2n * n^n^2 % OP's expression
    quad
    ufracn^n2^2n n^n^2
    quad
    ufracn^n2^2n (n^n)^2$

    bigskip
    display math mode, verb+frac+ notation

    smallskip
    $displaystyle
    fracn^n2^2n n^n^2
    quad
    ufracn^n2^2n n^n^2
    quad
    ufracn^n2^2n (n^n)^2$

    bigskip
    inline-frac notation

    smallskip
    $n^n/(2^2n n^n^2)
    quad
    n^n/(2^2n (n^n)^2)$
    enddocument





    share|improve this answer















    I think the denominator of your frac expression suffers from two issues:



    • a "cramped" look, i.e., the exponents are not raised much above the baseline

    • first- and second-order exponents are raised to (very nearly) the same height

    How to remedy these issues?



    • To address the first issue, switch to "uncramped" mode -- see the ufrac macro below.



    • To remedy the second issue, I suggest you switch from n^n^2 to n^n^2. (The two forms are the same, mathematically speaking, but they are quite differnt from a typographic point of view.) That, or use parentheses to visually "enclose" the n^n term.



      Alternatively, consider switching from "standard" frac notation to inline-fraction notation.



    Whatever else you do, please don't use the unnecessary * multiplication symbol. If you can't do without an explicit multiplication symbol, do use cdot, not *.



    enter image description here



    documentclassarticle

    %% "uncramped" frac macro:
    %% (Source: @egreg [who else?!], https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/337334/5001)
    makeatletter
    newcommandufrac[2]%
    frac#1mathpaletteufrac@den#2
    newcommandufrac@den[2]#1#2
    makeatother

    begindocument
    inline math mode, verb+frac+ notation

    $fracn^n2^2n * n^n^2 % OP's expression
    quad
    ufracn^n2^2n n^n^2
    quad
    ufracn^n2^2n (n^n)^2$

    bigskip
    display math mode, verb+frac+ notation

    smallskip
    $displaystyle
    fracn^n2^2n n^n^2
    quad
    ufracn^n2^2n n^n^2
    quad
    ufracn^n2^2n (n^n)^2$

    bigskip
    inline-frac notation

    smallskip
    $n^n/(2^2n n^n^2)
    quad
    n^n/(2^2n (n^n)^2)$
    enddocument






    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Feb 1 at 6:44

























    answered Feb 1 at 5:34









    MicoMico

    280k31381770




    280k31381770







    • 1





      I specially like the 3rd option instead of the first one. We need more parentheses, but we guarantee not to destroy line spacing (and sometines it is visually better). Thanks for showing us the options!

      – manooooh
      Feb 1 at 7:10












    • 1





      I specially like the 3rd option instead of the first one. We need more parentheses, but we guarantee not to destroy line spacing (and sometines it is visually better). Thanks for showing us the options!

      – manooooh
      Feb 1 at 7:10







    1




    1





    I specially like the 3rd option instead of the first one. We need more parentheses, but we guarantee not to destroy line spacing (and sometines it is visually better). Thanks for showing us the options!

    – manooooh
    Feb 1 at 7:10





    I specially like the 3rd option instead of the first one. We need more parentheses, but we guarantee not to destroy line spacing (and sometines it is visually better). Thanks for showing us the options!

    – manooooh
    Feb 1 at 7:10











    6














    Does this go in the right direction?



    documentclass[fleqn]article

    begindocument
    paragraphOriginal:
    $fracn^n2^2n * n^n^2$
    [fracn^n2^2n * n^n^2]

    paragraphProposal:
    $fracn^n2^2n * mathstrut n^n^2$
    [fracn^n2^2n * mathstrut n^n^2]


    paragraphWith brackets:
    $fracn^n2^2n * ( n^n)^2$

    [fracn^n2^2n * (n^n)^2]

    enddocument


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer



























      6














      Does this go in the right direction?



      documentclass[fleqn]article

      begindocument
      paragraphOriginal:
      $fracn^n2^2n * n^n^2$
      [fracn^n2^2n * n^n^2]

      paragraphProposal:
      $fracn^n2^2n * mathstrut n^n^2$
      [fracn^n2^2n * mathstrut n^n^2]


      paragraphWith brackets:
      $fracn^n2^2n * ( n^n)^2$

      [fracn^n2^2n * (n^n)^2]

      enddocument


      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer

























        6












        6








        6







        Does this go in the right direction?



        documentclass[fleqn]article

        begindocument
        paragraphOriginal:
        $fracn^n2^2n * n^n^2$
        [fracn^n2^2n * n^n^2]

        paragraphProposal:
        $fracn^n2^2n * mathstrut n^n^2$
        [fracn^n2^2n * mathstrut n^n^2]


        paragraphWith brackets:
        $fracn^n2^2n * ( n^n)^2$

        [fracn^n2^2n * (n^n)^2]

        enddocument


        enter image description here






        share|improve this answer













        Does this go in the right direction?



        documentclass[fleqn]article

        begindocument
        paragraphOriginal:
        $fracn^n2^2n * n^n^2$
        [fracn^n2^2n * n^n^2]

        paragraphProposal:
        $fracn^n2^2n * mathstrut n^n^2$
        [fracn^n2^2n * mathstrut n^n^2]


        paragraphWith brackets:
        $fracn^n2^2n * ( n^n)^2$

        [fracn^n2^2n * (n^n)^2]

        enddocument


        enter image description here







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Feb 1 at 5:08









        marmotmarmot

        102k4121231




        102k4121231



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f472826%2fhow-to-give-the-exponent-terms-in-the-denominator-part-of-a-frac-expression-mor%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown






            Popular posts from this blog

            How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

            Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

            How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?