Why did the Chinese send flies and plants to the far side of the moon?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
$begingroup$
The Chinese space craft that just landed on the moon had a tube with a biosphere in with flies and plants. What are they expecting to learn? Didn't we already experiment that on the ISS?
Source
Chinese scientists released this image of a cotton plant germinating in its tank on the moon aboard the Chang'e 4 lander. The photograph was taken Jan. 7, 2019. Credit: Chongqing University
the-moon life plants chang-e
edited Jan 18 at 11:13
JCRM
3,36421032
asked Jan 15 at 18:06
Geordi La ForgeGeordi La Forge
188126
$endgroup$
migrated from astronomy.stackexchange.com Jan 15 at 18:19
This question came from our site for astronomers and astrophysicists.
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The Chinese space craft that just landed on the moon had a tube with a biosphere in with flies and plants. What are they expecting to learn? Didn't we already experiment that on the ISS?
Source
Chinese scientists released this image of a cotton plant germinating in its tank on the moon aboard the Chang'e 4 lander. The photograph was taken Jan. 7, 2019. Credit: Chongqing University
the-moon life plants chang-e
edited Jan 18 at 11:13
JCRM
3,36421032
asked Jan 15 at 18:06
Geordi La ForgeGeordi La Forge
188126
$endgroup$
migrated from astronomy.stackexchange.com Jan 15 at 18:19
This question came from our site for astronomers and astrophysicists.
3
$begingroup$
Your title is unclear on which part you're asking about. Do you mean why did they send this stuff to specifically the far side of the moon, as distinct from some other part of the moon? Or why did they send this specific stuff, rather than something else? In either case, I suspect the answer is that they wanted a mission that included living things, they wanted a mission to the far side, and the living things don't care which side of the moon they're on so they may as well kill both birds with the same stone.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
Jan 17 at 11:49
$begingroup$
Sorry to break it to you, but the cotton plants have died.
$endgroup$
– JPhi1618
Jan 17 at 16:19
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The Chinese space craft that just landed on the moon had a tube with a biosphere in with flies and plants. What are they expecting to learn? Didn't we already experiment that on the ISS?
Source
Chinese scientists released this image of a cotton plant germinating in its tank on the moon aboard the Chang'e 4 lander. The photograph was taken Jan. 7, 2019. Credit: Chongqing University
the-moon life plants chang-e
edited Jan 18 at 11:13
JCRM
3,36421032
asked Jan 15 at 18:06
Geordi La ForgeGeordi La Forge
188126
$endgroup$
The Chinese space craft that just landed on the moon had a tube with a biosphere in with flies and plants. What are they expecting to learn? Didn't we already experiment that on the ISS?
Source
Chinese scientists released this image of a cotton plant germinating in its tank on the moon aboard the Chang'e 4 lander. The photograph was taken Jan. 7, 2019. Credit: Chongqing University
the-moon life plants chang-e
the-moon life plants chang-e
edited Jan 18 at 11:13
JCRM
3,36421032
asked Jan 15 at 18:06
Geordi La ForgeGeordi La Forge
188126
edited Jan 18 at 11:13
JCRM
3,36421032
asked Jan 15 at 18:06
Geordi La ForgeGeordi La Forge
188126
edited Jan 18 at 11:13
JCRM
3,36421032
edited Jan 18 at 11:13
JCRM
3,36421032
edited Jan 18 at 11:13
JCRM
3,36421032
3,36421032
asked Jan 15 at 18:06
Geordi La ForgeGeordi La Forge
188126
asked Jan 15 at 18:06
Geordi La ForgeGeordi La Forge
188126
asked Jan 15 at 18:06
Geordi La ForgeGeordi La Forge
188126
188126
migrated from astronomy.stackexchange.com Jan 15 at 18:19
This question came from our site for astronomers and astrophysicists.
migrated from astronomy.stackexchange.com Jan 15 at 18:19
This question came from our site for astronomers and astrophysicists.
3
$begingroup$
Your title is unclear on which part you're asking about. Do you mean why did they send this stuff to specifically the far side of the moon, as distinct from some other part of the moon? Or why did they send this specific stuff, rather than something else? In either case, I suspect the answer is that they wanted a mission that included living things, they wanted a mission to the far side, and the living things don't care which side of the moon they're on so they may as well kill both birds with the same stone.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
Jan 17 at 11:49
$begingroup$
Sorry to break it to you, but the cotton plants have died.
$endgroup$
– JPhi1618
Jan 17 at 16:19
add a comment |
3
$begingroup$
Your title is unclear on which part you're asking about. Do you mean why did they send this stuff to specifically the far side of the moon, as distinct from some other part of the moon? Or why did they send this specific stuff, rather than something else? In either case, I suspect the answer is that they wanted a mission that included living things, they wanted a mission to the far side, and the living things don't care which side of the moon they're on so they may as well kill both birds with the same stone.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
Jan 17 at 11:49
$begingroup$
Sorry to break it to you, but the cotton plants have died.
$endgroup$
– JPhi1618
Jan 17 at 16:19
3
3
$begingroup$
Your title is unclear on which part you're asking about. Do you mean why did they send this stuff to specifically the far side of the moon, as distinct from some other part of the moon? Or why did they send this specific stuff, rather than something else? In either case, I suspect the answer is that they wanted a mission that included living things, they wanted a mission to the far side, and the living things don't care which side of the moon they're on so they may as well kill both birds with the same stone.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
Jan 17 at 11:49
$begingroup$
Your title is unclear on which part you're asking about. Do you mean why did they send this stuff to specifically the far side of the moon, as distinct from some other part of the moon? Or why did they send this specific stuff, rather than something else? In either case, I suspect the answer is that they wanted a mission that included living things, they wanted a mission to the far side, and the living things don't care which side of the moon they're on so they may as well kill both birds with the same stone.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
Jan 17 at 11:49
$begingroup$
Sorry to break it to you, but the cotton plants have died.
$endgroup$
– JPhi1618
Jan 17 at 16:19
$begingroup$
Sorry to break it to you, but the cotton plants have died.
$endgroup$
– JPhi1618
Jan 17 at 16:19
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The capsule and its seeds are stored on the Chang'e 4 lander. It protects the biosphere from the positive +/-200C degree temperature swings. They are basically experimenting to see how life evolves and survives in near zero gravity. Unlike the ISS where they essentially tested the same concept just in Zero Gravity. Learning this will better prepare humanity for populating other planets as well as long space travel time.
answered Jan 15 at 18:09
KingsInnerSoulKingsInnerSoul
6501714
$endgroup$
Some of the information contained in this post requires additional references. Please edit to add citations to reliable sources that support the assertions made here. Unsourced material may be disputed or deleted.
6
$begingroup$
Do they have counter plans in case the plants get sick and so on?
$endgroup$
– Geordi La Forge
Jan 15 at 18:11
4
$begingroup$
The unprecedented plan to create life in outer space is the most intriguing part of China's lunar probe mission later this year, and could be a major boost for dreams that humans will one day live on the Moon. "Our experiment might help accumulate knowledge for building a lunar base and long-term residence on the Moon," Professor Liu - So yeah, I assume they do have contingency plans.
$endgroup$
– KingsInnerSoul
Jan 15 at 18:12
7
$begingroup$
@GeordiLaForge Counter plans like what? It's on the far side of the moon. If it dies, it dies.
$endgroup$
– Graham
Jan 15 at 22:48
5
$begingroup$
@Graham Doesn't preclude contingency plans, like designing the experiment with two redundant chambers, so that the opportunity for science isn't wasted. Like the backup spider they flew on the ISS.
$endgroup$
– user71659
Jan 16 at 0:17
9
$begingroup$
"They are basically experimenting to see how life evolves" - I haven't seen any indication that multiple generations and evolution are part of their scientific plans for this mission. Any source for that?
$endgroup$
– Mołot
Jan 16 at 19:10
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
Right now, almost 100% of existing research on growth in gravity fields is basically at 0g (ISS/Mir/Skylab/whatever) or 1g.
There are a lot of questions of what happens at 1/6g or 2/3g? No good experiments to demonstrate.
Thus the Chinese lander is testing 1/6th g.
SpaceX is likely to brute force test 38% g when they get to Mars. It is entirely possible that mitigation techniques developed for 0g are not useful or needed or effective at 38% g.
The Space Studies Institute (Via Gary Hudson, of Rotary Rocket infamy (alas)) is pushing for something they call G-Lab, an orbital facility with a control facility, at 0g and then a centrifuge at some other value.
If you are interested in this topic, there is an excellent "The Space Show with David Livingston" episode where Gary Hudson discusses this issue. The Space Show does not allow transcripts so I cannot link to anything like that, you are left with only listening.
answered Jan 15 at 18:38
geoffcgeoffc
55.1k9160306
$endgroup$
6
$begingroup$
I suspect it would actually have been cheaper to build a dedicated ⅙g artificial-gravity mission in LEO for these experiments (basically need only tether the tubes to a counterweight and spin it up with a monopropellant thruster), than to add them to the moon mission with its much higher Δv demand. Just, “first plant in ⅙g” doesn't have quite the PR ring that “first plant on the moon” has.
$endgroup$
– leftaroundabout
Jan 15 at 22:31
4
$begingroup$
Putting a small spinning plant on the ISS seems a lot easier for low G experiments too, even just two hanging flowerpots on a string, or a centrifuge
$endgroup$
– Xen2050
Jan 16 at 4:18
3
$begingroup$
@leftaroundabout: A low-g centrifuge in LEO would only test growing plants in a centrifuge in LEO. Growing them on the moon tests growing them in the actual lunar environment. Of course for a full test, they should have scooped up some lunar "soil" and tried growing plants in that.
$endgroup$
– jamesqf
Jan 16 at 5:18
6
$begingroup$
@jamesqf I highly doubt that plants would survive in lunar regolith, at least without a lot of pre-processing. Both on the moon and on Mars, the first plants will be grown hydroponically and more or less completely isolated from the environment, save for the gravity, and that again is pretty much perfectly emulated by a centrifuge. (You may object that a centrifuge also generates Coriolis force, but that's hardly relevant for a plant because nothing in it moves fast.)
$endgroup$
– leftaroundabout
Jan 16 at 8:51
2
$begingroup$
"at 0g (ISS/Mir/Skylab/whatever) or 1g.": you should specify where the 1g experiements are. (Kidding.)
$endgroup$
– msh210
Jan 16 at 10:38
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
They did it for propaganda or pride mostly. What sprouted quickly died because it froze. They did not have a method to protect the biosphere from the temperature swings. This is what they expected and admit.
The Chang'e-4 probe entered a "sleep mode" on Sunday as the first lunar night after the probe's landing fell. The temperature could drop as low as about minus 170 degrees centigrade.
"Life in the canister would not survive the lunar night," [experiment designer Professor] Xie [Gengxin] said.
(Xinhua)
There was no intention of seeing how well plants grow to any level of maturity. All they did was prove a seed can sprout at 1/6g. If a seed can sprout at 1g or 0g, I think it is safe to assume it would sprout at 1/6g. They might have proved a seed can sprout outside the protection of Earths magnetosphere, but the moon is sometimes in the tail of our magnetosphere. I'm not sure if it was at this time. Testing if the cumulative radiation dose over such a short mission would damage a seed could have been tested on earth. There was no real scientific value in this experiment that was not also obtainable for less effort and cost. The logical conclusion is that it was done for human emotional reasons. I'm not knocking them for that, I think it's cool.
edited Jan 18 at 4:48
Nathan Tuggy
3,71942637
answered Jan 17 at 3:16
DiznasterDiznaster
611
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Seems like there's a contradiction here; another answer says they did have a way to protect from temperature swings. Can you add a reference for the lack of protection, especially if from official Chinese sources?
$endgroup$
– Nathan Tuggy
Jan 17 at 3:25
1
$begingroup$
Several articles have bits and pieces from Professor Xie Gengxin (head of "experiment"). If you search his name you can find many quotes. Here is an example: xinhuanet.com/english/2019-01/15/c_137745505.htm If you dig thru the articles found by searching him you will see some fancy wording about "special" aluminum alloy materials and such. Which is a dead tell for propaganda in China or North Korea. Unless they invented transparent aluminum, it's BS. Here is the kicker: "Life in the canister would not survive the lunar night," Xie said. Parse the words Would not vs Did not.
$endgroup$
– Diznaster
Jan 18 at 4:31
$begingroup$
Can you show an article where they explained their heating mechanisms and biosphere climate controls?
$endgroup$
– Diznaster
Jan 18 at 4:32
$begingroup$
"propaganda and pride mostly" and to provide the scientists and engineers involved some practical experience
$endgroup$
– noɥʇʎԀʎzɐɹƆ
Jan 18 at 6:07
2
$begingroup$
I believe @NathanTuggy's comment was not a challenge, Diznaster, but a suggestion as to how you could improve the quality of your answer.
$endgroup$
– JCRM
Jan 18 at 10:57
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
They ran a competition for an experiment to make use of spare capacity on the lander. This one was chosen, most likely for it's potential to cultivate interest in the mission.
answered Jan 18 at 11:16
JCRMJCRM
3,36421032
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "508"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f33618%2fwhy-did-the-chinese-send-flies-and-plants-to-the-far-side-of-the-moon%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The capsule and its seeds are stored on the Chang'e 4 lander. It protects the biosphere from the positive +/-200C degree temperature swings. They are basically experimenting to see how life evolves and survives in near zero gravity. Unlike the ISS where they essentially tested the same concept just in Zero Gravity. Learning this will better prepare humanity for populating other planets as well as long space travel time.
answered Jan 15 at 18:09
KingsInnerSoulKingsInnerSoul
6501714
$endgroup$
Some of the information contained in this post requires additional references. Please edit to add citations to reliable sources that support the assertions made here. Unsourced material may be disputed or deleted.
6
$begingroup$
Do they have counter plans in case the plants get sick and so on?
$endgroup$
– Geordi La Forge
Jan 15 at 18:11
4
$begingroup$
The unprecedented plan to create life in outer space is the most intriguing part of China's lunar probe mission later this year, and could be a major boost for dreams that humans will one day live on the Moon. "Our experiment might help accumulate knowledge for building a lunar base and long-term residence on the Moon," Professor Liu - So yeah, I assume they do have contingency plans.
$endgroup$
– KingsInnerSoul
Jan 15 at 18:12
7
$begingroup$
@GeordiLaForge Counter plans like what? It's on the far side of the moon. If it dies, it dies.
$endgroup$
– Graham
Jan 15 at 22:48
5
$begingroup$
@Graham Doesn't preclude contingency plans, like designing the experiment with two redundant chambers, so that the opportunity for science isn't wasted. Like the backup spider they flew on the ISS.
$endgroup$
– user71659
Jan 16 at 0:17
9
$begingroup$
"They are basically experimenting to see how life evolves" - I haven't seen any indication that multiple generations and evolution are part of their scientific plans for this mission. Any source for that?
$endgroup$
– Mołot
Jan 16 at 19:10
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
The capsule and its seeds are stored on the Chang'e 4 lander. It protects the biosphere from the positive +/-200C degree temperature swings. They are basically experimenting to see how life evolves and survives in near zero gravity. Unlike the ISS where they essentially tested the same concept just in Zero Gravity. Learning this will better prepare humanity for populating other planets as well as long space travel time.
answered Jan 15 at 18:09
KingsInnerSoulKingsInnerSoul
6501714
$endgroup$
Some of the information contained in this post requires additional references. Please edit to add citations to reliable sources that support the assertions made here. Unsourced material may be disputed or deleted.
6
$begingroup$
Do they have counter plans in case the plants get sick and so on?
$endgroup$
– Geordi La Forge
Jan 15 at 18:11
4
$begingroup$
The unprecedented plan to create life in outer space is the most intriguing part of China's lunar probe mission later this year, and could be a major boost for dreams that humans will one day live on the Moon. "Our experiment might help accumulate knowledge for building a lunar base and long-term residence on the Moon," Professor Liu - So yeah, I assume they do have contingency plans.
$endgroup$
– KingsInnerSoul
Jan 15 at 18:12
7
$begingroup$
@GeordiLaForge Counter plans like what? It's on the far side of the moon. If it dies, it dies.
$endgroup$
– Graham
Jan 15 at 22:48
5
$begingroup$
@Graham Doesn't preclude contingency plans, like designing the experiment with two redundant chambers, so that the opportunity for science isn't wasted. Like the backup spider they flew on the ISS.
$endgroup$
– user71659
Jan 16 at 0:17
9
$begingroup$
"They are basically experimenting to see how life evolves" - I haven't seen any indication that multiple generations and evolution are part of their scientific plans for this mission. Any source for that?
$endgroup$
– Mołot
Jan 16 at 19:10
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
The capsule and its seeds are stored on the Chang'e 4 lander. It protects the biosphere from the positive +/-200C degree temperature swings. They are basically experimenting to see how life evolves and survives in near zero gravity. Unlike the ISS where they essentially tested the same concept just in Zero Gravity. Learning this will better prepare humanity for populating other planets as well as long space travel time.
answered Jan 15 at 18:09
KingsInnerSoulKingsInnerSoul
6501714
$endgroup$
The capsule and its seeds are stored on the Chang'e 4 lander. It protects the biosphere from the positive +/-200C degree temperature swings. They are basically experimenting to see how life evolves and survives in near zero gravity. Unlike the ISS where they essentially tested the same concept just in Zero Gravity. Learning this will better prepare humanity for populating other planets as well as long space travel time.
answered Jan 15 at 18:09
KingsInnerSoulKingsInnerSoul
6501714
answered Jan 15 at 18:09
KingsInnerSoulKingsInnerSoul
6501714
answered Jan 15 at 18:09
KingsInnerSoulKingsInnerSoul
6501714
answered Jan 15 at 18:09
KingsInnerSoulKingsInnerSoul
6501714
6501714
Some of the information contained in this post requires additional references. Please edit to add citations to reliable sources that support the assertions made here. Unsourced material may be disputed or deleted.
Some of the information contained in this post requires additional references. Please edit to add citations to reliable sources that support the assertions made here. Unsourced material may be disputed or deleted.
6
$begingroup$
Do they have counter plans in case the plants get sick and so on?
$endgroup$
– Geordi La Forge
Jan 15 at 18:11
4
$begingroup$
The unprecedented plan to create life in outer space is the most intriguing part of China's lunar probe mission later this year, and could be a major boost for dreams that humans will one day live on the Moon. "Our experiment might help accumulate knowledge for building a lunar base and long-term residence on the Moon," Professor Liu - So yeah, I assume they do have contingency plans.
$endgroup$
– KingsInnerSoul
Jan 15 at 18:12
7
$begingroup$
@GeordiLaForge Counter plans like what? It's on the far side of the moon. If it dies, it dies.
$endgroup$
– Graham
Jan 15 at 22:48
5
$begingroup$
@Graham Doesn't preclude contingency plans, like designing the experiment with two redundant chambers, so that the opportunity for science isn't wasted. Like the backup spider they flew on the ISS.
$endgroup$
– user71659
Jan 16 at 0:17
9
$begingroup$
"They are basically experimenting to see how life evolves" - I haven't seen any indication that multiple generations and evolution are part of their scientific plans for this mission. Any source for that?
$endgroup$
– Mołot
Jan 16 at 19:10
|
show 4 more comments
6
$begingroup$
Do they have counter plans in case the plants get sick and so on?
$endgroup$
– Geordi La Forge
Jan 15 at 18:11
4
$begingroup$
The unprecedented plan to create life in outer space is the most intriguing part of China's lunar probe mission later this year, and could be a major boost for dreams that humans will one day live on the Moon. "Our experiment might help accumulate knowledge for building a lunar base and long-term residence on the Moon," Professor Liu - So yeah, I assume they do have contingency plans.
$endgroup$
– KingsInnerSoul
Jan 15 at 18:12
7
$begingroup$
@GeordiLaForge Counter plans like what? It's on the far side of the moon. If it dies, it dies.
$endgroup$
– Graham
Jan 15 at 22:48
5
$begingroup$
@Graham Doesn't preclude contingency plans, like designing the experiment with two redundant chambers, so that the opportunity for science isn't wasted. Like the backup spider they flew on the ISS.
$endgroup$
– user71659
Jan 16 at 0:17
9
$begingroup$
"They are basically experimenting to see how life evolves" - I haven't seen any indication that multiple generations and evolution are part of their scientific plans for this mission. Any source for that?
$endgroup$
– Mołot
Jan 16 at 19:10
6
6
$begingroup$
Do they have counter plans in case the plants get sick and so on?
$endgroup$
– Geordi La Forge
Jan 15 at 18:11
$begingroup$
Do they have counter plans in case the plants get sick and so on?
$endgroup$
– Geordi La Forge
Jan 15 at 18:11
4
4
$begingroup$
The unprecedented plan to create life in outer space is the most intriguing part of China's lunar probe mission later this year, and could be a major boost for dreams that humans will one day live on the Moon. "Our experiment might help accumulate knowledge for building a lunar base and long-term residence on the Moon," Professor Liu - So yeah, I assume they do have contingency plans.
$endgroup$
– KingsInnerSoul
Jan 15 at 18:12
$begingroup$
The unprecedented plan to create life in outer space is the most intriguing part of China's lunar probe mission later this year, and could be a major boost for dreams that humans will one day live on the Moon. "Our experiment might help accumulate knowledge for building a lunar base and long-term residence on the Moon," Professor Liu - So yeah, I assume they do have contingency plans.
$endgroup$
– KingsInnerSoul
Jan 15 at 18:12
7
7
$begingroup$
@GeordiLaForge Counter plans like what? It's on the far side of the moon. If it dies, it dies.
$endgroup$
– Graham
Jan 15 at 22:48
$begingroup$
@GeordiLaForge Counter plans like what? It's on the far side of the moon. If it dies, it dies.
$endgroup$
– Graham
Jan 15 at 22:48
5
5
$begingroup$
@Graham Doesn't preclude contingency plans, like designing the experiment with two redundant chambers, so that the opportunity for science isn't wasted. Like the backup spider they flew on the ISS.
$endgroup$
– user71659
Jan 16 at 0:17
$begingroup$
@Graham Doesn't preclude contingency plans, like designing the experiment with two redundant chambers, so that the opportunity for science isn't wasted. Like the backup spider they flew on the ISS.
$endgroup$
– user71659
Jan 16 at 0:17
9
9
$begingroup$
"They are basically experimenting to see how life evolves" - I haven't seen any indication that multiple generations and evolution are part of their scientific plans for this mission. Any source for that?
$endgroup$
– Mołot
Jan 16 at 19:10
$begingroup$
"They are basically experimenting to see how life evolves" - I haven't seen any indication that multiple generations and evolution are part of their scientific plans for this mission. Any source for that?
$endgroup$
– Mołot
Jan 16 at 19:10
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
Right now, almost 100% of existing research on growth in gravity fields is basically at 0g (ISS/Mir/Skylab/whatever) or 1g.
There are a lot of questions of what happens at 1/6g or 2/3g? No good experiments to demonstrate.
Thus the Chinese lander is testing 1/6th g.
SpaceX is likely to brute force test 38% g when they get to Mars. It is entirely possible that mitigation techniques developed for 0g are not useful or needed or effective at 38% g.
The Space Studies Institute (Via Gary Hudson, of Rotary Rocket infamy (alas)) is pushing for something they call G-Lab, an orbital facility with a control facility, at 0g and then a centrifuge at some other value.
If you are interested in this topic, there is an excellent "The Space Show with David Livingston" episode where Gary Hudson discusses this issue. The Space Show does not allow transcripts so I cannot link to anything like that, you are left with only listening.
answered Jan 15 at 18:38
geoffcgeoffc
55.1k9160306
$endgroup$
6
$begingroup$
I suspect it would actually have been cheaper to build a dedicated ⅙g artificial-gravity mission in LEO for these experiments (basically need only tether the tubes to a counterweight and spin it up with a monopropellant thruster), than to add them to the moon mission with its much higher Δv demand. Just, “first plant in ⅙g” doesn't have quite the PR ring that “first plant on the moon” has.
$endgroup$
– leftaroundabout
Jan 15 at 22:31
4
$begingroup$
Putting a small spinning plant on the ISS seems a lot easier for low G experiments too, even just two hanging flowerpots on a string, or a centrifuge
$endgroup$
– Xen2050
Jan 16 at 4:18
3
$begingroup$
@leftaroundabout: A low-g centrifuge in LEO would only test growing plants in a centrifuge in LEO. Growing them on the moon tests growing them in the actual lunar environment. Of course for a full test, they should have scooped up some lunar "soil" and tried growing plants in that.
$endgroup$
– jamesqf
Jan 16 at 5:18
6
$begingroup$
@jamesqf I highly doubt that plants would survive in lunar regolith, at least without a lot of pre-processing. Both on the moon and on Mars, the first plants will be grown hydroponically and more or less completely isolated from the environment, save for the gravity, and that again is pretty much perfectly emulated by a centrifuge. (You may object that a centrifuge also generates Coriolis force, but that's hardly relevant for a plant because nothing in it moves fast.)
$endgroup$
– leftaroundabout
Jan 16 at 8:51
2
$begingroup$
"at 0g (ISS/Mir/Skylab/whatever) or 1g.": you should specify where the 1g experiements are. (Kidding.)
$endgroup$
– msh210
Jan 16 at 10:38
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Right now, almost 100% of existing research on growth in gravity fields is basically at 0g (ISS/Mir/Skylab/whatever) or 1g.
There are a lot of questions of what happens at 1/6g or 2/3g? No good experiments to demonstrate.
Thus the Chinese lander is testing 1/6th g.
SpaceX is likely to brute force test 38% g when they get to Mars. It is entirely possible that mitigation techniques developed for 0g are not useful or needed or effective at 38% g.
The Space Studies Institute (Via Gary Hudson, of Rotary Rocket infamy (alas)) is pushing for something they call G-Lab, an orbital facility with a control facility, at 0g and then a centrifuge at some other value.
If you are interested in this topic, there is an excellent "The Space Show with David Livingston" episode where Gary Hudson discusses this issue. The Space Show does not allow transcripts so I cannot link to anything like that, you are left with only listening.
answered Jan 15 at 18:38
geoffcgeoffc
55.1k9160306
$endgroup$
6
$begingroup$
I suspect it would actually have been cheaper to build a dedicated ⅙g artificial-gravity mission in LEO for these experiments (basically need only tether the tubes to a counterweight and spin it up with a monopropellant thruster), than to add them to the moon mission with its much higher Δv demand. Just, “first plant in ⅙g” doesn't have quite the PR ring that “first plant on the moon” has.
$endgroup$
– leftaroundabout
Jan 15 at 22:31
4
$begingroup$
Putting a small spinning plant on the ISS seems a lot easier for low G experiments too, even just two hanging flowerpots on a string, or a centrifuge
$endgroup$
– Xen2050
Jan 16 at 4:18
3
$begingroup$
@leftaroundabout: A low-g centrifuge in LEO would only test growing plants in a centrifuge in LEO. Growing them on the moon tests growing them in the actual lunar environment. Of course for a full test, they should have scooped up some lunar "soil" and tried growing plants in that.
$endgroup$
– jamesqf
Jan 16 at 5:18
6
$begingroup$
@jamesqf I highly doubt that plants would survive in lunar regolith, at least without a lot of pre-processing. Both on the moon and on Mars, the first plants will be grown hydroponically and more or less completely isolated from the environment, save for the gravity, and that again is pretty much perfectly emulated by a centrifuge. (You may object that a centrifuge also generates Coriolis force, but that's hardly relevant for a plant because nothing in it moves fast.)
$endgroup$
– leftaroundabout
Jan 16 at 8:51
2
$begingroup$
"at 0g (ISS/Mir/Skylab/whatever) or 1g.": you should specify where the 1g experiements are. (Kidding.)
$endgroup$
– msh210
Jan 16 at 10:38
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Right now, almost 100% of existing research on growth in gravity fields is basically at 0g (ISS/Mir/Skylab/whatever) or 1g.
There are a lot of questions of what happens at 1/6g or 2/3g? No good experiments to demonstrate.
Thus the Chinese lander is testing 1/6th g.
SpaceX is likely to brute force test 38% g when they get to Mars. It is entirely possible that mitigation techniques developed for 0g are not useful or needed or effective at 38% g.
The Space Studies Institute (Via Gary Hudson, of Rotary Rocket infamy (alas)) is pushing for something they call G-Lab, an orbital facility with a control facility, at 0g and then a centrifuge at some other value.
If you are interested in this topic, there is an excellent "The Space Show with David Livingston" episode where Gary Hudson discusses this issue. The Space Show does not allow transcripts so I cannot link to anything like that, you are left with only listening.
answered Jan 15 at 18:38
geoffcgeoffc
55.1k9160306
$endgroup$
Right now, almost 100% of existing research on growth in gravity fields is basically at 0g (ISS/Mir/Skylab/whatever) or 1g.
There are a lot of questions of what happens at 1/6g or 2/3g? No good experiments to demonstrate.
Thus the Chinese lander is testing 1/6th g.
SpaceX is likely to brute force test 38% g when they get to Mars. It is entirely possible that mitigation techniques developed for 0g are not useful or needed or effective at 38% g.
The Space Studies Institute (Via Gary Hudson, of Rotary Rocket infamy (alas)) is pushing for something they call G-Lab, an orbital facility with a control facility, at 0g and then a centrifuge at some other value.
If you are interested in this topic, there is an excellent "The Space Show with David Livingston" episode where Gary Hudson discusses this issue. The Space Show does not allow transcripts so I cannot link to anything like that, you are left with only listening.
answered Jan 15 at 18:38
geoffcgeoffc
55.1k9160306
edited Jan 15 at 21:59
answered Jan 15 at 18:38
geoffcgeoffc
55.1k9160306
answered Jan 15 at 18:38
geoffcgeoffc
55.1k9160306
answered Jan 15 at 18:38
geoffcgeoffc
55.1k9160306
55.1k9160306
6
$begingroup$
I suspect it would actually have been cheaper to build a dedicated ⅙g artificial-gravity mission in LEO for these experiments (basically need only tether the tubes to a counterweight and spin it up with a monopropellant thruster), than to add them to the moon mission with its much higher Δv demand. Just, “first plant in ⅙g” doesn't have quite the PR ring that “first plant on the moon” has.
$endgroup$
– leftaroundabout
Jan 15 at 22:31
4
$begingroup$
Putting a small spinning plant on the ISS seems a lot easier for low G experiments too, even just two hanging flowerpots on a string, or a centrifuge
$endgroup$
– Xen2050
Jan 16 at 4:18
3
$begingroup$
@leftaroundabout: A low-g centrifuge in LEO would only test growing plants in a centrifuge in LEO. Growing them on the moon tests growing them in the actual lunar environment. Of course for a full test, they should have scooped up some lunar "soil" and tried growing plants in that.
$endgroup$
– jamesqf
Jan 16 at 5:18
6
$begingroup$
@jamesqf I highly doubt that plants would survive in lunar regolith, at least without a lot of pre-processing. Both on the moon and on Mars, the first plants will be grown hydroponically and more or less completely isolated from the environment, save for the gravity, and that again is pretty much perfectly emulated by a centrifuge. (You may object that a centrifuge also generates Coriolis force, but that's hardly relevant for a plant because nothing in it moves fast.)
$endgroup$
– leftaroundabout
Jan 16 at 8:51
2
$begingroup$
"at 0g (ISS/Mir/Skylab/whatever) or 1g.": you should specify where the 1g experiements are. (Kidding.)
$endgroup$
– msh210
Jan 16 at 10:38
|
show 2 more comments
6
$begingroup$
I suspect it would actually have been cheaper to build a dedicated ⅙g artificial-gravity mission in LEO for these experiments (basically need only tether the tubes to a counterweight and spin it up with a monopropellant thruster), than to add them to the moon mission with its much higher Δv demand. Just, “first plant in ⅙g” doesn't have quite the PR ring that “first plant on the moon” has.
$endgroup$
– leftaroundabout
Jan 15 at 22:31
4
$begingroup$
Putting a small spinning plant on the ISS seems a lot easier for low G experiments too, even just two hanging flowerpots on a string, or a centrifuge
$endgroup$
– Xen2050
Jan 16 at 4:18
3
$begingroup$
@leftaroundabout: A low-g centrifuge in LEO would only test growing plants in a centrifuge in LEO. Growing them on the moon tests growing them in the actual lunar environment. Of course for a full test, they should have scooped up some lunar "soil" and tried growing plants in that.
$endgroup$
– jamesqf
Jan 16 at 5:18
6
$begingroup$
@jamesqf I highly doubt that plants would survive in lunar regolith, at least without a lot of pre-processing. Both on the moon and on Mars, the first plants will be grown hydroponically and more or less completely isolated from the environment, save for the gravity, and that again is pretty much perfectly emulated by a centrifuge. (You may object that a centrifuge also generates Coriolis force, but that's hardly relevant for a plant because nothing in it moves fast.)
$endgroup$
– leftaroundabout
Jan 16 at 8:51
2
$begingroup$
"at 0g (ISS/Mir/Skylab/whatever) or 1g.": you should specify where the 1g experiements are. (Kidding.)
$endgroup$
– msh210
Jan 16 at 10:38
6
6
$begingroup$
I suspect it would actually have been cheaper to build a dedicated ⅙g artificial-gravity mission in LEO for these experiments (basically need only tether the tubes to a counterweight and spin it up with a monopropellant thruster), than to add them to the moon mission with its much higher Δv demand. Just, “first plant in ⅙g” doesn't have quite the PR ring that “first plant on the moon” has.
$endgroup$
– leftaroundabout
Jan 15 at 22:31
$begingroup$
I suspect it would actually have been cheaper to build a dedicated ⅙g artificial-gravity mission in LEO for these experiments (basically need only tether the tubes to a counterweight and spin it up with a monopropellant thruster), than to add them to the moon mission with its much higher Δv demand. Just, “first plant in ⅙g” doesn't have quite the PR ring that “first plant on the moon” has.
$endgroup$
– leftaroundabout
Jan 15 at 22:31
4
4
$begingroup$
Putting a small spinning plant on the ISS seems a lot easier for low G experiments too, even just two hanging flowerpots on a string, or a centrifuge
$endgroup$
– Xen2050
Jan 16 at 4:18
$begingroup$
Putting a small spinning plant on the ISS seems a lot easier for low G experiments too, even just two hanging flowerpots on a string, or a centrifuge
$endgroup$
– Xen2050
Jan 16 at 4:18
3
3
$begingroup$
@leftaroundabout: A low-g centrifuge in LEO would only test growing plants in a centrifuge in LEO. Growing them on the moon tests growing them in the actual lunar environment. Of course for a full test, they should have scooped up some lunar "soil" and tried growing plants in that.
$endgroup$
– jamesqf
Jan 16 at 5:18
$begingroup$
@leftaroundabout: A low-g centrifuge in LEO would only test growing plants in a centrifuge in LEO. Growing them on the moon tests growing them in the actual lunar environment. Of course for a full test, they should have scooped up some lunar "soil" and tried growing plants in that.
$endgroup$
– jamesqf
Jan 16 at 5:18
6
6
$begingroup$
@jamesqf I highly doubt that plants would survive in lunar regolith, at least without a lot of pre-processing. Both on the moon and on Mars, the first plants will be grown hydroponically and more or less completely isolated from the environment, save for the gravity, and that again is pretty much perfectly emulated by a centrifuge. (You may object that a centrifuge also generates Coriolis force, but that's hardly relevant for a plant because nothing in it moves fast.)
$endgroup$
– leftaroundabout
Jan 16 at 8:51
$begingroup$
@jamesqf I highly doubt that plants would survive in lunar regolith, at least without a lot of pre-processing. Both on the moon and on Mars, the first plants will be grown hydroponically and more or less completely isolated from the environment, save for the gravity, and that again is pretty much perfectly emulated by a centrifuge. (You may object that a centrifuge also generates Coriolis force, but that's hardly relevant for a plant because nothing in it moves fast.)
$endgroup$
– leftaroundabout
Jan 16 at 8:51
2
2
$begingroup$
"at 0g (ISS/Mir/Skylab/whatever) or 1g.": you should specify where the 1g experiements are. (Kidding.)
$endgroup$
– msh210
Jan 16 at 10:38
$begingroup$
"at 0g (ISS/Mir/Skylab/whatever) or 1g.": you should specify where the 1g experiements are. (Kidding.)
$endgroup$
– msh210
Jan 16 at 10:38
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
They did it for propaganda or pride mostly. What sprouted quickly died because it froze. They did not have a method to protect the biosphere from the temperature swings. This is what they expected and admit.
The Chang'e-4 probe entered a "sleep mode" on Sunday as the first lunar night after the probe's landing fell. The temperature could drop as low as about minus 170 degrees centigrade.
"Life in the canister would not survive the lunar night," [experiment designer Professor] Xie [Gengxin] said.
(Xinhua)
There was no intention of seeing how well plants grow to any level of maturity. All they did was prove a seed can sprout at 1/6g. If a seed can sprout at 1g or 0g, I think it is safe to assume it would sprout at 1/6g. They might have proved a seed can sprout outside the protection of Earths magnetosphere, but the moon is sometimes in the tail of our magnetosphere. I'm not sure if it was at this time. Testing if the cumulative radiation dose over such a short mission would damage a seed could have been tested on earth. There was no real scientific value in this experiment that was not also obtainable for less effort and cost. The logical conclusion is that it was done for human emotional reasons. I'm not knocking them for that, I think it's cool.
edited Jan 18 at 4:48
Nathan Tuggy
3,71942637
answered Jan 17 at 3:16
DiznasterDiznaster
611
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Seems like there's a contradiction here; another answer says they did have a way to protect from temperature swings. Can you add a reference for the lack of protection, especially if from official Chinese sources?
$endgroup$
– Nathan Tuggy
Jan 17 at 3:25
1
$begingroup$
Several articles have bits and pieces from Professor Xie Gengxin (head of "experiment"). If you search his name you can find many quotes. Here is an example: xinhuanet.com/english/2019-01/15/c_137745505.htm If you dig thru the articles found by searching him you will see some fancy wording about "special" aluminum alloy materials and such. Which is a dead tell for propaganda in China or North Korea. Unless they invented transparent aluminum, it's BS. Here is the kicker: "Life in the canister would not survive the lunar night," Xie said. Parse the words Would not vs Did not.
$endgroup$
– Diznaster
Jan 18 at 4:31
$begingroup$
Can you show an article where they explained their heating mechanisms and biosphere climate controls?
$endgroup$
– Diznaster
Jan 18 at 4:32
$begingroup$
"propaganda and pride mostly" and to provide the scientists and engineers involved some practical experience
$endgroup$
– noɥʇʎԀʎzɐɹƆ
Jan 18 at 6:07
2
$begingroup$
I believe @NathanTuggy's comment was not a challenge, Diznaster, but a suggestion as to how you could improve the quality of your answer.
$endgroup$
– JCRM
Jan 18 at 10:57
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
They did it for propaganda or pride mostly. What sprouted quickly died because it froze. They did not have a method to protect the biosphere from the temperature swings. This is what they expected and admit.
The Chang'e-4 probe entered a "sleep mode" on Sunday as the first lunar night after the probe's landing fell. The temperature could drop as low as about minus 170 degrees centigrade.
"Life in the canister would not survive the lunar night," [experiment designer Professor] Xie [Gengxin] said.
(Xinhua)
There was no intention of seeing how well plants grow to any level of maturity. All they did was prove a seed can sprout at 1/6g. If a seed can sprout at 1g or 0g, I think it is safe to assume it would sprout at 1/6g. They might have proved a seed can sprout outside the protection of Earths magnetosphere, but the moon is sometimes in the tail of our magnetosphere. I'm not sure if it was at this time. Testing if the cumulative radiation dose over such a short mission would damage a seed could have been tested on earth. There was no real scientific value in this experiment that was not also obtainable for less effort and cost. The logical conclusion is that it was done for human emotional reasons. I'm not knocking them for that, I think it's cool.
edited Jan 18 at 4:48
Nathan Tuggy
3,71942637
answered Jan 17 at 3:16
DiznasterDiznaster
611
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Seems like there's a contradiction here; another answer says they did have a way to protect from temperature swings. Can you add a reference for the lack of protection, especially if from official Chinese sources?
$endgroup$
– Nathan Tuggy
Jan 17 at 3:25
1
$begingroup$
Several articles have bits and pieces from Professor Xie Gengxin (head of "experiment"). If you search his name you can find many quotes. Here is an example: xinhuanet.com/english/2019-01/15/c_137745505.htm If you dig thru the articles found by searching him you will see some fancy wording about "special" aluminum alloy materials and such. Which is a dead tell for propaganda in China or North Korea. Unless they invented transparent aluminum, it's BS. Here is the kicker: "Life in the canister would not survive the lunar night," Xie said. Parse the words Would not vs Did not.
$endgroup$
– Diznaster
Jan 18 at 4:31
$begingroup$
Can you show an article where they explained their heating mechanisms and biosphere climate controls?
$endgroup$
– Diznaster
Jan 18 at 4:32
$begingroup$
"propaganda and pride mostly" and to provide the scientists and engineers involved some practical experience
$endgroup$
– noɥʇʎԀʎzɐɹƆ
Jan 18 at 6:07
2
$begingroup$
I believe @NathanTuggy's comment was not a challenge, Diznaster, but a suggestion as to how you could improve the quality of your answer.
$endgroup$
– JCRM
Jan 18 at 10:57
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
They did it for propaganda or pride mostly. What sprouted quickly died because it froze. They did not have a method to protect the biosphere from the temperature swings. This is what they expected and admit.
The Chang'e-4 probe entered a "sleep mode" on Sunday as the first lunar night after the probe's landing fell. The temperature could drop as low as about minus 170 degrees centigrade.
"Life in the canister would not survive the lunar night," [experiment designer Professor] Xie [Gengxin] said.
(Xinhua)
There was no intention of seeing how well plants grow to any level of maturity. All they did was prove a seed can sprout at 1/6g. If a seed can sprout at 1g or 0g, I think it is safe to assume it would sprout at 1/6g. They might have proved a seed can sprout outside the protection of Earths magnetosphere, but the moon is sometimes in the tail of our magnetosphere. I'm not sure if it was at this time. Testing if the cumulative radiation dose over such a short mission would damage a seed could have been tested on earth. There was no real scientific value in this experiment that was not also obtainable for less effort and cost. The logical conclusion is that it was done for human emotional reasons. I'm not knocking them for that, I think it's cool.
edited Jan 18 at 4:48
Nathan Tuggy
3,71942637
answered Jan 17 at 3:16
DiznasterDiznaster
611
$endgroup$
They did it for propaganda or pride mostly. What sprouted quickly died because it froze. They did not have a method to protect the biosphere from the temperature swings. This is what they expected and admit.
The Chang'e-4 probe entered a "sleep mode" on Sunday as the first lunar night after the probe's landing fell. The temperature could drop as low as about minus 170 degrees centigrade.
"Life in the canister would not survive the lunar night," [experiment designer Professor] Xie [Gengxin] said.
(Xinhua)
There was no intention of seeing how well plants grow to any level of maturity. All they did was prove a seed can sprout at 1/6g. If a seed can sprout at 1g or 0g, I think it is safe to assume it would sprout at 1/6g. They might have proved a seed can sprout outside the protection of Earths magnetosphere, but the moon is sometimes in the tail of our magnetosphere. I'm not sure if it was at this time. Testing if the cumulative radiation dose over such a short mission would damage a seed could have been tested on earth. There was no real scientific value in this experiment that was not also obtainable for less effort and cost. The logical conclusion is that it was done for human emotional reasons. I'm not knocking them for that, I think it's cool.
edited Jan 18 at 4:48
Nathan Tuggy
3,71942637
answered Jan 17 at 3:16
DiznasterDiznaster
611
edited Jan 18 at 4:48
Nathan Tuggy
3,71942637
edited Jan 18 at 4:48
Nathan Tuggy
3,71942637
edited Jan 18 at 4:48
Nathan Tuggy
3,71942637
3,71942637
answered Jan 17 at 3:16
DiznasterDiznaster
611
answered Jan 17 at 3:16
DiznasterDiznaster
611
answered Jan 17 at 3:16
DiznasterDiznaster
611
611
1
$begingroup$
Seems like there's a contradiction here; another answer says they did have a way to protect from temperature swings. Can you add a reference for the lack of protection, especially if from official Chinese sources?
$endgroup$
– Nathan Tuggy
Jan 17 at 3:25
1
$begingroup$
Several articles have bits and pieces from Professor Xie Gengxin (head of "experiment"). If you search his name you can find many quotes. Here is an example: xinhuanet.com/english/2019-01/15/c_137745505.htm If you dig thru the articles found by searching him you will see some fancy wording about "special" aluminum alloy materials and such. Which is a dead tell for propaganda in China or North Korea. Unless they invented transparent aluminum, it's BS. Here is the kicker: "Life in the canister would not survive the lunar night," Xie said. Parse the words Would not vs Did not.
$endgroup$
– Diznaster
Jan 18 at 4:31
$begingroup$
Can you show an article where they explained their heating mechanisms and biosphere climate controls?
$endgroup$
– Diznaster
Jan 18 at 4:32
$begingroup$
"propaganda and pride mostly" and to provide the scientists and engineers involved some practical experience
$endgroup$
– noɥʇʎԀʎzɐɹƆ
Jan 18 at 6:07
2
$begingroup$
I believe @NathanTuggy's comment was not a challenge, Diznaster, but a suggestion as to how you could improve the quality of your answer.
$endgroup$
– JCRM
Jan 18 at 10:57
|
show 1 more comment
1
$begingroup$
Seems like there's a contradiction here; another answer says they did have a way to protect from temperature swings. Can you add a reference for the lack of protection, especially if from official Chinese sources?
$endgroup$
– Nathan Tuggy
Jan 17 at 3:25
1
$begingroup$
Several articles have bits and pieces from Professor Xie Gengxin (head of "experiment"). If you search his name you can find many quotes. Here is an example: xinhuanet.com/english/2019-01/15/c_137745505.htm If you dig thru the articles found by searching him you will see some fancy wording about "special" aluminum alloy materials and such. Which is a dead tell for propaganda in China or North Korea. Unless they invented transparent aluminum, it's BS. Here is the kicker: "Life in the canister would not survive the lunar night," Xie said. Parse the words Would not vs Did not.
$endgroup$
– Diznaster
Jan 18 at 4:31
$begingroup$
Can you show an article where they explained their heating mechanisms and biosphere climate controls?
$endgroup$
– Diznaster
Jan 18 at 4:32
$begingroup$
"propaganda and pride mostly" and to provide the scientists and engineers involved some practical experience
$endgroup$
– noɥʇʎԀʎzɐɹƆ
Jan 18 at 6:07
2
$begingroup$
I believe @NathanTuggy's comment was not a challenge, Diznaster, but a suggestion as to how you could improve the quality of your answer.
$endgroup$
– JCRM
Jan 18 at 10:57
1
1
$begingroup$
Seems like there's a contradiction here; another answer says they did have a way to protect from temperature swings. Can you add a reference for the lack of protection, especially if from official Chinese sources?
$endgroup$
– Nathan Tuggy
Jan 17 at 3:25
$begingroup$
Seems like there's a contradiction here; another answer says they did have a way to protect from temperature swings. Can you add a reference for the lack of protection, especially if from official Chinese sources?
$endgroup$
– Nathan Tuggy
Jan 17 at 3:25
1
1
$begingroup$
Several articles have bits and pieces from Professor Xie Gengxin (head of "experiment"). If you search his name you can find many quotes. Here is an example: xinhuanet.com/english/2019-01/15/c_137745505.htm If you dig thru the articles found by searching him you will see some fancy wording about "special" aluminum alloy materials and such. Which is a dead tell for propaganda in China or North Korea. Unless they invented transparent aluminum, it's BS. Here is the kicker: "Life in the canister would not survive the lunar night," Xie said. Parse the words Would not vs Did not.
$endgroup$
– Diznaster
Jan 18 at 4:31
$begingroup$
Several articles have bits and pieces from Professor Xie Gengxin (head of "experiment"). If you search his name you can find many quotes. Here is an example: xinhuanet.com/english/2019-01/15/c_137745505.htm If you dig thru the articles found by searching him you will see some fancy wording about "special" aluminum alloy materials and such. Which is a dead tell for propaganda in China or North Korea. Unless they invented transparent aluminum, it's BS. Here is the kicker: "Life in the canister would not survive the lunar night," Xie said. Parse the words Would not vs Did not.
$endgroup$
– Diznaster
Jan 18 at 4:31
$begingroup$
Can you show an article where they explained their heating mechanisms and biosphere climate controls?
$endgroup$
– Diznaster
Jan 18 at 4:32
$begingroup$
Can you show an article where they explained their heating mechanisms and biosphere climate controls?
$endgroup$
– Diznaster
Jan 18 at 4:32
$begingroup$
"propaganda and pride mostly" and to provide the scientists and engineers involved some practical experience
$endgroup$
– noɥʇʎԀʎzɐɹƆ
Jan 18 at 6:07
$begingroup$
"propaganda and pride mostly" and to provide the scientists and engineers involved some practical experience
$endgroup$
– noɥʇʎԀʎzɐɹƆ
Jan 18 at 6:07
2
2
$begingroup$
I believe @NathanTuggy's comment was not a challenge, Diznaster, but a suggestion as to how you could improve the quality of your answer.
$endgroup$
– JCRM
Jan 18 at 10:57
$begingroup$
I believe @NathanTuggy's comment was not a challenge, Diznaster, but a suggestion as to how you could improve the quality of your answer.
$endgroup$
– JCRM
Jan 18 at 10:57
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
They ran a competition for an experiment to make use of spare capacity on the lander. This one was chosen, most likely for it's potential to cultivate interest in the mission.
answered Jan 18 at 11:16
JCRMJCRM
3,36421032
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
They ran a competition for an experiment to make use of spare capacity on the lander. This one was chosen, most likely for it's potential to cultivate interest in the mission.
answered Jan 18 at 11:16
JCRMJCRM
3,36421032
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
They ran a competition for an experiment to make use of spare capacity on the lander. This one was chosen, most likely for it's potential to cultivate interest in the mission.
answered Jan 18 at 11:16
JCRMJCRM
3,36421032
$endgroup$
They ran a competition for an experiment to make use of spare capacity on the lander. This one was chosen, most likely for it's potential to cultivate interest in the mission.
answered Jan 18 at 11:16
JCRMJCRM
3,36421032
answered Jan 18 at 11:16
JCRMJCRM
3,36421032
answered Jan 18 at 11:16
JCRMJCRM
3,36421032
answered Jan 18 at 11:16
JCRMJCRM
3,36421032
3,36421032
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Space Exploration Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f33618%2fwhy-did-the-chinese-send-flies-and-plants-to-the-far-side-of-the-moon%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
$begingroup$
Your title is unclear on which part you're asking about. Do you mean why did they send this stuff to specifically the far side of the moon, as distinct from some other part of the moon? Or why did they send this specific stuff, rather than something else? In either case, I suspect the answer is that they wanted a mission that included living things, they wanted a mission to the far side, and the living things don't care which side of the moon they're on so they may as well kill both birds with the same stone.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
Jan 17 at 11:49
$begingroup$
Sorry to break it to you, but the cotton plants have died.
$endgroup$
– JPhi1618
Jan 17 at 16:19