How to make symlink executable?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
I am using the Cloud9.io IDE.
I have downloaded the Julia generic executable and extracted it.
sudo wget https://julialang-s3.julialang.org/bin/linux/x64/1.0/julia-1.0.3-linux-x86_64.tar.gz
tar xvzf julia-1.0.3-linux-x86_64.tar.gz
now I can run the program by julia-1.0.3/bin/julia
.
So the next step I try to make a symlink so I just run the program by entering julia
. So I tried
sudo ln -s julia-1.0.3/bin/julia julia
and when I run julia
it says
bash: julia: command not found
But the file is clearly in my directory. What am I missing here?
symlink
add a comment |
I am using the Cloud9.io IDE.
I have downloaded the Julia generic executable and extracted it.
sudo wget https://julialang-s3.julialang.org/bin/linux/x64/1.0/julia-1.0.3-linux-x86_64.tar.gz
tar xvzf julia-1.0.3-linux-x86_64.tar.gz
now I can run the program by julia-1.0.3/bin/julia
.
So the next step I try to make a symlink so I just run the program by entering julia
. So I tried
sudo ln -s julia-1.0.3/bin/julia julia
and when I run julia
it says
bash: julia: command not found
But the file is clearly in my directory. What am I missing here?
symlink
add a comment |
I am using the Cloud9.io IDE.
I have downloaded the Julia generic executable and extracted it.
sudo wget https://julialang-s3.julialang.org/bin/linux/x64/1.0/julia-1.0.3-linux-x86_64.tar.gz
tar xvzf julia-1.0.3-linux-x86_64.tar.gz
now I can run the program by julia-1.0.3/bin/julia
.
So the next step I try to make a symlink so I just run the program by entering julia
. So I tried
sudo ln -s julia-1.0.3/bin/julia julia
and when I run julia
it says
bash: julia: command not found
But the file is clearly in my directory. What am I missing here?
symlink
I am using the Cloud9.io IDE.
I have downloaded the Julia generic executable and extracted it.
sudo wget https://julialang-s3.julialang.org/bin/linux/x64/1.0/julia-1.0.3-linux-x86_64.tar.gz
tar xvzf julia-1.0.3-linux-x86_64.tar.gz
now I can run the program by julia-1.0.3/bin/julia
.
So the next step I try to make a symlink so I just run the program by entering julia
. So I tried
sudo ln -s julia-1.0.3/bin/julia julia
and when I run julia
it says
bash: julia: command not found
But the file is clearly in my directory. What am I missing here?
symlink
symlink
edited Jan 17 at 4:06
xiaodai
asked Jan 15 at 22:52
xiaodaixiaodai
1084
1084
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Bash will find an executable specified by its bare filename (i.e. without preceding path elements) only if it is on its search path, which is stored in the PATH variable. The current directory is not necessarily on the search path.
To see the current search path, try this:
echo $PATH
To see if a command is on your search path, try this:
which command
If command
is on the search path, the which
command will return the command's location on the file system. - To extend your search path with the directory of your command, try:
PATH=$PATH:directory_to_be_added
Note that directory_to_be_added
should be the full directory name to the executable (not a directory relative to your current directory).
Once the directory of your julia
command has been added to your PATH, which julia
should return julia
's full pathname, and julia
should be executable from anywhere on your filesystem.
Changing the PATH is a general way of ensuring that executables that you use regularly are found by the shell. If you merely wish to run a command that is not on the search path once (i.e. in a one-off attempt), or you wish to override the search path, you can specify your command including pathname elements. So, to run a command that is in the current directory and not on the search path (or not the first command with that name on the search path), you could use ./command
.
How comejulia-1.0.3/bin/julia
works? Sobash
can run a executable if you specify the full path?
– xiaodai
Jan 15 at 23:09
3
@xiaodai The PATH is consulted only in case thecommand
that your trying to execute has no path-elements in it. So you could runjulia
from the current directory by giving the command./julia
(the./
being the path element that prevents a PATH search). Similarly, your commandjulia-1.0.3/bin/julia
includes path elements, which causes Bash not to search the PATH, but instead to run the specified executable directly.
– ozzy
Jan 15 at 23:17
2
I'd recommend putting the part about./julia
in your answer — that's the normal thing people do.
– mattdm
Jan 16 at 0:29
1
@mattdm You are right. I amended the answer accordingly.
– ozzy
Jan 16 at 8:11
add a comment |
Answering to the question asked in the title.
Nothing is required to make a symlink executable (or not executable for that matter).
Actually, a symlink permissions serve no purpose on most OSes, including Linux. The execution permissions that are taken into account are the ones of the file linked to, if any.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f494695%2fhow-to-make-symlink-executable%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Bash will find an executable specified by its bare filename (i.e. without preceding path elements) only if it is on its search path, which is stored in the PATH variable. The current directory is not necessarily on the search path.
To see the current search path, try this:
echo $PATH
To see if a command is on your search path, try this:
which command
If command
is on the search path, the which
command will return the command's location on the file system. - To extend your search path with the directory of your command, try:
PATH=$PATH:directory_to_be_added
Note that directory_to_be_added
should be the full directory name to the executable (not a directory relative to your current directory).
Once the directory of your julia
command has been added to your PATH, which julia
should return julia
's full pathname, and julia
should be executable from anywhere on your filesystem.
Changing the PATH is a general way of ensuring that executables that you use regularly are found by the shell. If you merely wish to run a command that is not on the search path once (i.e. in a one-off attempt), or you wish to override the search path, you can specify your command including pathname elements. So, to run a command that is in the current directory and not on the search path (or not the first command with that name on the search path), you could use ./command
.
How comejulia-1.0.3/bin/julia
works? Sobash
can run a executable if you specify the full path?
– xiaodai
Jan 15 at 23:09
3
@xiaodai The PATH is consulted only in case thecommand
that your trying to execute has no path-elements in it. So you could runjulia
from the current directory by giving the command./julia
(the./
being the path element that prevents a PATH search). Similarly, your commandjulia-1.0.3/bin/julia
includes path elements, which causes Bash not to search the PATH, but instead to run the specified executable directly.
– ozzy
Jan 15 at 23:17
2
I'd recommend putting the part about./julia
in your answer — that's the normal thing people do.
– mattdm
Jan 16 at 0:29
1
@mattdm You are right. I amended the answer accordingly.
– ozzy
Jan 16 at 8:11
add a comment |
Bash will find an executable specified by its bare filename (i.e. without preceding path elements) only if it is on its search path, which is stored in the PATH variable. The current directory is not necessarily on the search path.
To see the current search path, try this:
echo $PATH
To see if a command is on your search path, try this:
which command
If command
is on the search path, the which
command will return the command's location on the file system. - To extend your search path with the directory of your command, try:
PATH=$PATH:directory_to_be_added
Note that directory_to_be_added
should be the full directory name to the executable (not a directory relative to your current directory).
Once the directory of your julia
command has been added to your PATH, which julia
should return julia
's full pathname, and julia
should be executable from anywhere on your filesystem.
Changing the PATH is a general way of ensuring that executables that you use regularly are found by the shell. If you merely wish to run a command that is not on the search path once (i.e. in a one-off attempt), or you wish to override the search path, you can specify your command including pathname elements. So, to run a command that is in the current directory and not on the search path (or not the first command with that name on the search path), you could use ./command
.
How comejulia-1.0.3/bin/julia
works? Sobash
can run a executable if you specify the full path?
– xiaodai
Jan 15 at 23:09
3
@xiaodai The PATH is consulted only in case thecommand
that your trying to execute has no path-elements in it. So you could runjulia
from the current directory by giving the command./julia
(the./
being the path element that prevents a PATH search). Similarly, your commandjulia-1.0.3/bin/julia
includes path elements, which causes Bash not to search the PATH, but instead to run the specified executable directly.
– ozzy
Jan 15 at 23:17
2
I'd recommend putting the part about./julia
in your answer — that's the normal thing people do.
– mattdm
Jan 16 at 0:29
1
@mattdm You are right. I amended the answer accordingly.
– ozzy
Jan 16 at 8:11
add a comment |
Bash will find an executable specified by its bare filename (i.e. without preceding path elements) only if it is on its search path, which is stored in the PATH variable. The current directory is not necessarily on the search path.
To see the current search path, try this:
echo $PATH
To see if a command is on your search path, try this:
which command
If command
is on the search path, the which
command will return the command's location on the file system. - To extend your search path with the directory of your command, try:
PATH=$PATH:directory_to_be_added
Note that directory_to_be_added
should be the full directory name to the executable (not a directory relative to your current directory).
Once the directory of your julia
command has been added to your PATH, which julia
should return julia
's full pathname, and julia
should be executable from anywhere on your filesystem.
Changing the PATH is a general way of ensuring that executables that you use regularly are found by the shell. If you merely wish to run a command that is not on the search path once (i.e. in a one-off attempt), or you wish to override the search path, you can specify your command including pathname elements. So, to run a command that is in the current directory and not on the search path (or not the first command with that name on the search path), you could use ./command
.
Bash will find an executable specified by its bare filename (i.e. without preceding path elements) only if it is on its search path, which is stored in the PATH variable. The current directory is not necessarily on the search path.
To see the current search path, try this:
echo $PATH
To see if a command is on your search path, try this:
which command
If command
is on the search path, the which
command will return the command's location on the file system. - To extend your search path with the directory of your command, try:
PATH=$PATH:directory_to_be_added
Note that directory_to_be_added
should be the full directory name to the executable (not a directory relative to your current directory).
Once the directory of your julia
command has been added to your PATH, which julia
should return julia
's full pathname, and julia
should be executable from anywhere on your filesystem.
Changing the PATH is a general way of ensuring that executables that you use regularly are found by the shell. If you merely wish to run a command that is not on the search path once (i.e. in a one-off attempt), or you wish to override the search path, you can specify your command including pathname elements. So, to run a command that is in the current directory and not on the search path (or not the first command with that name on the search path), you could use ./command
.
edited Jan 16 at 8:09
answered Jan 15 at 22:58
ozzyozzy
71715
71715
How comejulia-1.0.3/bin/julia
works? Sobash
can run a executable if you specify the full path?
– xiaodai
Jan 15 at 23:09
3
@xiaodai The PATH is consulted only in case thecommand
that your trying to execute has no path-elements in it. So you could runjulia
from the current directory by giving the command./julia
(the./
being the path element that prevents a PATH search). Similarly, your commandjulia-1.0.3/bin/julia
includes path elements, which causes Bash not to search the PATH, but instead to run the specified executable directly.
– ozzy
Jan 15 at 23:17
2
I'd recommend putting the part about./julia
in your answer — that's the normal thing people do.
– mattdm
Jan 16 at 0:29
1
@mattdm You are right. I amended the answer accordingly.
– ozzy
Jan 16 at 8:11
add a comment |
How comejulia-1.0.3/bin/julia
works? Sobash
can run a executable if you specify the full path?
– xiaodai
Jan 15 at 23:09
3
@xiaodai The PATH is consulted only in case thecommand
that your trying to execute has no path-elements in it. So you could runjulia
from the current directory by giving the command./julia
(the./
being the path element that prevents a PATH search). Similarly, your commandjulia-1.0.3/bin/julia
includes path elements, which causes Bash not to search the PATH, but instead to run the specified executable directly.
– ozzy
Jan 15 at 23:17
2
I'd recommend putting the part about./julia
in your answer — that's the normal thing people do.
– mattdm
Jan 16 at 0:29
1
@mattdm You are right. I amended the answer accordingly.
– ozzy
Jan 16 at 8:11
How come
julia-1.0.3/bin/julia
works? So bash
can run a executable if you specify the full path?– xiaodai
Jan 15 at 23:09
How come
julia-1.0.3/bin/julia
works? So bash
can run a executable if you specify the full path?– xiaodai
Jan 15 at 23:09
3
3
@xiaodai The PATH is consulted only in case the
command
that your trying to execute has no path-elements in it. So you could run julia
from the current directory by giving the command ./julia
(the ./
being the path element that prevents a PATH search). Similarly, your command julia-1.0.3/bin/julia
includes path elements, which causes Bash not to search the PATH, but instead to run the specified executable directly.– ozzy
Jan 15 at 23:17
@xiaodai The PATH is consulted only in case the
command
that your trying to execute has no path-elements in it. So you could run julia
from the current directory by giving the command ./julia
(the ./
being the path element that prevents a PATH search). Similarly, your command julia-1.0.3/bin/julia
includes path elements, which causes Bash not to search the PATH, but instead to run the specified executable directly.– ozzy
Jan 15 at 23:17
2
2
I'd recommend putting the part about
./julia
in your answer — that's the normal thing people do.– mattdm
Jan 16 at 0:29
I'd recommend putting the part about
./julia
in your answer — that's the normal thing people do.– mattdm
Jan 16 at 0:29
1
1
@mattdm You are right. I amended the answer accordingly.
– ozzy
Jan 16 at 8:11
@mattdm You are right. I amended the answer accordingly.
– ozzy
Jan 16 at 8:11
add a comment |
Answering to the question asked in the title.
Nothing is required to make a symlink executable (or not executable for that matter).
Actually, a symlink permissions serve no purpose on most OSes, including Linux. The execution permissions that are taken into account are the ones of the file linked to, if any.
add a comment |
Answering to the question asked in the title.
Nothing is required to make a symlink executable (or not executable for that matter).
Actually, a symlink permissions serve no purpose on most OSes, including Linux. The execution permissions that are taken into account are the ones of the file linked to, if any.
add a comment |
Answering to the question asked in the title.
Nothing is required to make a symlink executable (or not executable for that matter).
Actually, a symlink permissions serve no purpose on most OSes, including Linux. The execution permissions that are taken into account are the ones of the file linked to, if any.
Answering to the question asked in the title.
Nothing is required to make a symlink executable (or not executable for that matter).
Actually, a symlink permissions serve no purpose on most OSes, including Linux. The execution permissions that are taken into account are the ones of the file linked to, if any.
answered Jan 16 at 0:07
jlliagrejlliagre
46.9k783133
46.9k783133
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f494695%2fhow-to-make-symlink-executable%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown