SOCKS5 Proxy for Chromium
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
I am trying to use my SOCKS5 proxy with username and password authentication in Google Chromium.
I have tried almost every possible proxy switcher addon available in the chrome extensions store. All of them have neglected to add support for authentication, except for "Proxy Helper", which does not work. I am confident my proxy server is configured correctly, as it works in other applications.
The proxy settings button in the Chromium settings tab is "grayed out"/disabled, however this would only load the DE-specific proxy settings panel. I do not wish to use this proxy system wide, so this is not an option anyway.
I have determined that it is possible to specify a proxy for chromium using command-line flags. The documentation on the Chromium site has no mention of username/password authentication at all.
So I feel as if I have exhausted all possible options. Who would have thought such a seemingly-simple configuration would be so difficult.
If anyone knows if a simple "per-application" proxy configuration tool exists, similar to "Proxifier" on Windows, please let me know. I am using Arch Linux.
proxy chrome
asked Jan 12 '15 at 7:58
Jonathan DuncanJonathan Duncan
113
add a comment |
I am trying to use my SOCKS5 proxy with username and password authentication in Google Chromium.
I have tried almost every possible proxy switcher addon available in the chrome extensions store. All of them have neglected to add support for authentication, except for "Proxy Helper", which does not work. I am confident my proxy server is configured correctly, as it works in other applications.
The proxy settings button in the Chromium settings tab is "grayed out"/disabled, however this would only load the DE-specific proxy settings panel. I do not wish to use this proxy system wide, so this is not an option anyway.
I have determined that it is possible to specify a proxy for chromium using command-line flags. The documentation on the Chromium site has no mention of username/password authentication at all.
So I feel as if I have exhausted all possible options. Who would have thought such a seemingly-simple configuration would be so difficult.
If anyone knows if a simple "per-application" proxy configuration tool exists, similar to "Proxifier" on Windows, please let me know. I am using Arch Linux.
proxy chrome
asked Jan 12 '15 at 7:58
Jonathan DuncanJonathan Duncan
113
add a comment |
I am trying to use my SOCKS5 proxy with username and password authentication in Google Chromium.
I have tried almost every possible proxy switcher addon available in the chrome extensions store. All of them have neglected to add support for authentication, except for "Proxy Helper", which does not work. I am confident my proxy server is configured correctly, as it works in other applications.
The proxy settings button in the Chromium settings tab is "grayed out"/disabled, however this would only load the DE-specific proxy settings panel. I do not wish to use this proxy system wide, so this is not an option anyway.
I have determined that it is possible to specify a proxy for chromium using command-line flags. The documentation on the Chromium site has no mention of username/password authentication at all.
So I feel as if I have exhausted all possible options. Who would have thought such a seemingly-simple configuration would be so difficult.
If anyone knows if a simple "per-application" proxy configuration tool exists, similar to "Proxifier" on Windows, please let me know. I am using Arch Linux.
proxy chrome
asked Jan 12 '15 at 7:58
Jonathan DuncanJonathan Duncan
113
I am trying to use my SOCKS5 proxy with username and password authentication in Google Chromium.
I have tried almost every possible proxy switcher addon available in the chrome extensions store. All of them have neglected to add support for authentication, except for "Proxy Helper", which does not work. I am confident my proxy server is configured correctly, as it works in other applications.
The proxy settings button in the Chromium settings tab is "grayed out"/disabled, however this would only load the DE-specific proxy settings panel. I do not wish to use this proxy system wide, so this is not an option anyway.
I have determined that it is possible to specify a proxy for chromium using command-line flags. The documentation on the Chromium site has no mention of username/password authentication at all.
So I feel as if I have exhausted all possible options. Who would have thought such a seemingly-simple configuration would be so difficult.
If anyone knows if a simple "per-application" proxy configuration tool exists, similar to "Proxifier" on Windows, please let me know. I am using Arch Linux.
proxy chrome
proxy chrome
asked Jan 12 '15 at 7:58
Jonathan DuncanJonathan Duncan
113
asked Jan 12 '15 at 7:58
Jonathan DuncanJonathan Duncan
113
asked Jan 12 '15 at 7:58
Jonathan DuncanJonathan Duncan
113
asked Jan 12 '15 at 7:58
Jonathan DuncanJonathan Duncan
113
asked Jan 12 '15 at 7:58
Jonathan DuncanJonathan Duncan
113
113
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
You're probably looking for proxychains-ng. It lacks command-line options for setting proxy, but you can have as many config files as you need. It might be present in your package manager as proxychains4.
Alternatively you could use redsocks or tun2socks with iptables if per-user rules are sufficient.
answered Jun 10 '15 at 10:13
SlotosSlotos
1012
Should've checked this quirk before writing the answer, but here I am. Anyways, proxychains can't intercept forkers. Which Chrome inherently is. However it will still work with single-process browsers and other such software.
– Slotos
Jun 10 '15 at 10:30
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f178671%2fsocks5-proxy-for-chromium%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You're probably looking for proxychains-ng. It lacks command-line options for setting proxy, but you can have as many config files as you need. It might be present in your package manager as proxychains4.
Alternatively you could use redsocks or tun2socks with iptables if per-user rules are sufficient.
answered Jun 10 '15 at 10:13
SlotosSlotos
1012
Should've checked this quirk before writing the answer, but here I am. Anyways, proxychains can't intercept forkers. Which Chrome inherently is. However it will still work with single-process browsers and other such software.
– Slotos
Jun 10 '15 at 10:30
add a comment |
You're probably looking for proxychains-ng. It lacks command-line options for setting proxy, but you can have as many config files as you need. It might be present in your package manager as proxychains4.
Alternatively you could use redsocks or tun2socks with iptables if per-user rules are sufficient.
answered Jun 10 '15 at 10:13
SlotosSlotos
1012
Should've checked this quirk before writing the answer, but here I am. Anyways, proxychains can't intercept forkers. Which Chrome inherently is. However it will still work with single-process browsers and other such software.
– Slotos
Jun 10 '15 at 10:30
add a comment |
You're probably looking for proxychains-ng. It lacks command-line options for setting proxy, but you can have as many config files as you need. It might be present in your package manager as proxychains4.
Alternatively you could use redsocks or tun2socks with iptables if per-user rules are sufficient.
answered Jun 10 '15 at 10:13
SlotosSlotos
1012
You're probably looking for proxychains-ng. It lacks command-line options for setting proxy, but you can have as many config files as you need. It might be present in your package manager as proxychains4.
Alternatively you could use redsocks or tun2socks with iptables if per-user rules are sufficient.
answered Jun 10 '15 at 10:13
SlotosSlotos
1012
answered Jun 10 '15 at 10:13
SlotosSlotos
1012
answered Jun 10 '15 at 10:13
SlotosSlotos
1012
answered Jun 10 '15 at 10:13
SlotosSlotos
1012
1012
Should've checked this quirk before writing the answer, but here I am. Anyways, proxychains can't intercept forkers. Which Chrome inherently is. However it will still work with single-process browsers and other such software.
– Slotos
Jun 10 '15 at 10:30
add a comment |
Should've checked this quirk before writing the answer, but here I am. Anyways, proxychains can't intercept forkers. Which Chrome inherently is. However it will still work with single-process browsers and other such software.
– Slotos
Jun 10 '15 at 10:30
Should've checked this quirk before writing the answer, but here I am. Anyways, proxychains can't intercept forkers. Which Chrome inherently is. However it will still work with single-process browsers and other such software.
– Slotos
Jun 10 '15 at 10:30
Should've checked this quirk before writing the answer, but here I am. Anyways, proxychains can't intercept forkers. Which Chrome inherently is. However it will still work with single-process browsers and other such software.
– Slotos
Jun 10 '15 at 10:30
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f178671%2fsocks5-proxy-for-chromium%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
