Piltz Divisor Problem

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












2












$begingroup$


Let $tau_k(n)$ count the number of ways of representing $n$ as the product of $k$ natural numbers. It is known that:



$$D_k(x) = sum_n leq x tau_k(n) = xP_k(log x) + O(x ^1 - frac1k-1(log x)^k-2), ; forall k geq 2$$



Where $P_k$ is a polynomial of degree $k-1$ with leading coefficient $frac1(k-1)!$



I am asked to prove this. We may assume the base case as it is a well known result.



The assuming the result for all $l leq k$:



$$D_k(x) = sum_mn leq x tau_k-1(n) = sum_nleq xlfloorfracxnrfloortau_k-1(n)$$



$$= sum_n leq x(fracxn + O(1))tau_k-1(n) = xsum_n leq x fractau_k-1(n)n + O(sum_nleq xtau_k-1(n))$$



Using Abel's Summation formula, we may see that:



$$sum_n leq x fractau_k-1(n)n = P_k(log x) + O(x^frac-1k-1(log x)^k-3)$$



So:



$$D_k(x) = xP_k(log x) + O(x^1 - frac1k-1(log x)^k-3) + O(sum_n leq xtau_k-1(n))$$



Using the induction hypothesis:



$$O(sum_n leq xtau_k-1(n)) = O(xP_k-1(log x) + O(x^1 - frac1k-1(log x)^k-3))$$



$$= O(x(log x)^k-2) + O(x^1 - frac1k-1(log x)^k-3)) = O(x(log x)^k-2)$$



Thus we get:



$$D_k(x) = xP_k(log x) + O(x^1- frac1k-1(log x)^k-3) + O(x(log x)^k-2)$$



$$= xP_k(log x)+O(x(log x)^k-2)$$



However, this error term is too large. How can I go about reducing it?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    This question is not of research level (so it would be more suitable to ask at math.stackexchange.com), but Greg Martin gave an excellent answer. In general, consulting the textbooks before asking a question might be useful. BTW I used Dirichlet's hyperbola method for a recent MO question here: mathoverflow.net/questions/321839/…
    $endgroup$
    – GH from MO
    Feb 2 at 23:50
















2












$begingroup$


Let $tau_k(n)$ count the number of ways of representing $n$ as the product of $k$ natural numbers. It is known that:



$$D_k(x) = sum_n leq x tau_k(n) = xP_k(log x) + O(x ^1 - frac1k-1(log x)^k-2), ; forall k geq 2$$



Where $P_k$ is a polynomial of degree $k-1$ with leading coefficient $frac1(k-1)!$



I am asked to prove this. We may assume the base case as it is a well known result.



The assuming the result for all $l leq k$:



$$D_k(x) = sum_mn leq x tau_k-1(n) = sum_nleq xlfloorfracxnrfloortau_k-1(n)$$



$$= sum_n leq x(fracxn + O(1))tau_k-1(n) = xsum_n leq x fractau_k-1(n)n + O(sum_nleq xtau_k-1(n))$$



Using Abel's Summation formula, we may see that:



$$sum_n leq x fractau_k-1(n)n = P_k(log x) + O(x^frac-1k-1(log x)^k-3)$$



So:



$$D_k(x) = xP_k(log x) + O(x^1 - frac1k-1(log x)^k-3) + O(sum_n leq xtau_k-1(n))$$



Using the induction hypothesis:



$$O(sum_n leq xtau_k-1(n)) = O(xP_k-1(log x) + O(x^1 - frac1k-1(log x)^k-3))$$



$$= O(x(log x)^k-2) + O(x^1 - frac1k-1(log x)^k-3)) = O(x(log x)^k-2)$$



Thus we get:



$$D_k(x) = xP_k(log x) + O(x^1- frac1k-1(log x)^k-3) + O(x(log x)^k-2)$$



$$= xP_k(log x)+O(x(log x)^k-2)$$



However, this error term is too large. How can I go about reducing it?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    This question is not of research level (so it would be more suitable to ask at math.stackexchange.com), but Greg Martin gave an excellent answer. In general, consulting the textbooks before asking a question might be useful. BTW I used Dirichlet's hyperbola method for a recent MO question here: mathoverflow.net/questions/321839/…
    $endgroup$
    – GH from MO
    Feb 2 at 23:50














2












2








2





$begingroup$


Let $tau_k(n)$ count the number of ways of representing $n$ as the product of $k$ natural numbers. It is known that:



$$D_k(x) = sum_n leq x tau_k(n) = xP_k(log x) + O(x ^1 - frac1k-1(log x)^k-2), ; forall k geq 2$$



Where $P_k$ is a polynomial of degree $k-1$ with leading coefficient $frac1(k-1)!$



I am asked to prove this. We may assume the base case as it is a well known result.



The assuming the result for all $l leq k$:



$$D_k(x) = sum_mn leq x tau_k-1(n) = sum_nleq xlfloorfracxnrfloortau_k-1(n)$$



$$= sum_n leq x(fracxn + O(1))tau_k-1(n) = xsum_n leq x fractau_k-1(n)n + O(sum_nleq xtau_k-1(n))$$



Using Abel's Summation formula, we may see that:



$$sum_n leq x fractau_k-1(n)n = P_k(log x) + O(x^frac-1k-1(log x)^k-3)$$



So:



$$D_k(x) = xP_k(log x) + O(x^1 - frac1k-1(log x)^k-3) + O(sum_n leq xtau_k-1(n))$$



Using the induction hypothesis:



$$O(sum_n leq xtau_k-1(n)) = O(xP_k-1(log x) + O(x^1 - frac1k-1(log x)^k-3))$$



$$= O(x(log x)^k-2) + O(x^1 - frac1k-1(log x)^k-3)) = O(x(log x)^k-2)$$



Thus we get:



$$D_k(x) = xP_k(log x) + O(x^1- frac1k-1(log x)^k-3) + O(x(log x)^k-2)$$



$$= xP_k(log x)+O(x(log x)^k-2)$$



However, this error term is too large. How can I go about reducing it?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $tau_k(n)$ count the number of ways of representing $n$ as the product of $k$ natural numbers. It is known that:



$$D_k(x) = sum_n leq x tau_k(n) = xP_k(log x) + O(x ^1 - frac1k-1(log x)^k-2), ; forall k geq 2$$



Where $P_k$ is a polynomial of degree $k-1$ with leading coefficient $frac1(k-1)!$



I am asked to prove this. We may assume the base case as it is a well known result.



The assuming the result for all $l leq k$:



$$D_k(x) = sum_mn leq x tau_k-1(n) = sum_nleq xlfloorfracxnrfloortau_k-1(n)$$



$$= sum_n leq x(fracxn + O(1))tau_k-1(n) = xsum_n leq x fractau_k-1(n)n + O(sum_nleq xtau_k-1(n))$$



Using Abel's Summation formula, we may see that:



$$sum_n leq x fractau_k-1(n)n = P_k(log x) + O(x^frac-1k-1(log x)^k-3)$$



So:



$$D_k(x) = xP_k(log x) + O(x^1 - frac1k-1(log x)^k-3) + O(sum_n leq xtau_k-1(n))$$



Using the induction hypothesis:



$$O(sum_n leq xtau_k-1(n)) = O(xP_k-1(log x) + O(x^1 - frac1k-1(log x)^k-3))$$



$$= O(x(log x)^k-2) + O(x^1 - frac1k-1(log x)^k-3)) = O(x(log x)^k-2)$$



Thus we get:



$$D_k(x) = xP_k(log x) + O(x^1- frac1k-1(log x)^k-3) + O(x(log x)^k-2)$$



$$= xP_k(log x)+O(x(log x)^k-2)$$



However, this error term is too large. How can I go about reducing it?







nt.number-theory analytic-number-theory divisors-multiples






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Feb 12 at 18:42









Martin Sleziak

3,06032128




3,06032128










asked Feb 2 at 21:36









user366818user366818

1163




1163











  • $begingroup$
    This question is not of research level (so it would be more suitable to ask at math.stackexchange.com), but Greg Martin gave an excellent answer. In general, consulting the textbooks before asking a question might be useful. BTW I used Dirichlet's hyperbola method for a recent MO question here: mathoverflow.net/questions/321839/…
    $endgroup$
    – GH from MO
    Feb 2 at 23:50

















  • $begingroup$
    This question is not of research level (so it would be more suitable to ask at math.stackexchange.com), but Greg Martin gave an excellent answer. In general, consulting the textbooks before asking a question might be useful. BTW I used Dirichlet's hyperbola method for a recent MO question here: mathoverflow.net/questions/321839/…
    $endgroup$
    – GH from MO
    Feb 2 at 23:50
















$begingroup$
This question is not of research level (so it would be more suitable to ask at math.stackexchange.com), but Greg Martin gave an excellent answer. In general, consulting the textbooks before asking a question might be useful. BTW I used Dirichlet's hyperbola method for a recent MO question here: mathoverflow.net/questions/321839/…
$endgroup$
– GH from MO
Feb 2 at 23:50





$begingroup$
This question is not of research level (so it would be more suitable to ask at math.stackexchange.com), but Greg Martin gave an excellent answer. In general, consulting the textbooks before asking a question might be useful. BTW I used Dirichlet's hyperbola method for a recent MO question here: mathoverflow.net/questions/321839/…
$endgroup$
– GH from MO
Feb 2 at 23:50











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















8












$begingroup$

You've discovered some of the primary motivation for the invention of the Dirichlet hyperbola method. Since $tau_k = tau_k-1*1$ (which you are already using), you can take advantage of the extra parameter ($U$ and $V$ in the linked document, instead of just $x$) to get a better error term—just as in the proof of the base case $k=2$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "504"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f322316%2fpiltz-divisor-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    8












    $begingroup$

    You've discovered some of the primary motivation for the invention of the Dirichlet hyperbola method. Since $tau_k = tau_k-1*1$ (which you are already using), you can take advantage of the extra parameter ($U$ and $V$ in the linked document, instead of just $x$) to get a better error term—just as in the proof of the base case $k=2$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      8












      $begingroup$

      You've discovered some of the primary motivation for the invention of the Dirichlet hyperbola method. Since $tau_k = tau_k-1*1$ (which you are already using), you can take advantage of the extra parameter ($U$ and $V$ in the linked document, instead of just $x$) to get a better error term—just as in the proof of the base case $k=2$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        8












        8








        8





        $begingroup$

        You've discovered some of the primary motivation for the invention of the Dirichlet hyperbola method. Since $tau_k = tau_k-1*1$ (which you are already using), you can take advantage of the extra parameter ($U$ and $V$ in the linked document, instead of just $x$) to get a better error term—just as in the proof of the base case $k=2$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        You've discovered some of the primary motivation for the invention of the Dirichlet hyperbola method. Since $tau_k = tau_k-1*1$ (which you are already using), you can take advantage of the extra parameter ($U$ and $V$ in the linked document, instead of just $x$) to get a better error term—just as in the proof of the base case $k=2$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Feb 2 at 21:53









        Greg MartinGreg Martin

        8,78813560




        8,78813560



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f322316%2fpiltz-divisor-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown






            Popular posts from this blog

            Peggy Mitchell

            Palaiologos

            The Forum (Inglewood, California)