Piltz Divisor Problem

Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
$begingroup$
Let $tau_k(n)$ count the number of ways of representing $n$ as the product of $k$ natural numbers. It is known that:
$$D_k(x) = sum_n leq x tau_k(n) = xP_k(log x) + O(x ^1 - frac1k-1(log x)^k-2), ; forall k geq 2$$
Where $P_k$ is a polynomial of degree $k-1$ with leading coefficient $frac1(k-1)!$
I am asked to prove this. We may assume the base case as it is a well known result.
The assuming the result for all $l leq k$:
$$D_k(x) = sum_mn leq x tau_k-1(n) = sum_nleq xlfloorfracxnrfloortau_k-1(n)$$
$$= sum_n leq x(fracxn + O(1))tau_k-1(n) = xsum_n leq x fractau_k-1(n)n + O(sum_nleq xtau_k-1(n))$$
Using Abel's Summation formula, we may see that:
$$sum_n leq x fractau_k-1(n)n = P_k(log x) + O(x^frac-1k-1(log x)^k-3)$$
So:
$$D_k(x) = xP_k(log x) + O(x^1 - frac1k-1(log x)^k-3) + O(sum_n leq xtau_k-1(n))$$
Using the induction hypothesis:
$$O(sum_n leq xtau_k-1(n)) = O(xP_k-1(log x) + O(x^1 - frac1k-1(log x)^k-3))$$
$$= O(x(log x)^k-2) + O(x^1 - frac1k-1(log x)^k-3)) = O(x(log x)^k-2)$$
Thus we get:
$$D_k(x) = xP_k(log x) + O(x^1- frac1k-1(log x)^k-3) + O(x(log x)^k-2)$$
$$= xP_k(log x)+O(x(log x)^k-2)$$
However, this error term is too large. How can I go about reducing it?
nt.number-theory analytic-number-theory divisors-multiples
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $tau_k(n)$ count the number of ways of representing $n$ as the product of $k$ natural numbers. It is known that:
$$D_k(x) = sum_n leq x tau_k(n) = xP_k(log x) + O(x ^1 - frac1k-1(log x)^k-2), ; forall k geq 2$$
Where $P_k$ is a polynomial of degree $k-1$ with leading coefficient $frac1(k-1)!$
I am asked to prove this. We may assume the base case as it is a well known result.
The assuming the result for all $l leq k$:
$$D_k(x) = sum_mn leq x tau_k-1(n) = sum_nleq xlfloorfracxnrfloortau_k-1(n)$$
$$= sum_n leq x(fracxn + O(1))tau_k-1(n) = xsum_n leq x fractau_k-1(n)n + O(sum_nleq xtau_k-1(n))$$
Using Abel's Summation formula, we may see that:
$$sum_n leq x fractau_k-1(n)n = P_k(log x) + O(x^frac-1k-1(log x)^k-3)$$
So:
$$D_k(x) = xP_k(log x) + O(x^1 - frac1k-1(log x)^k-3) + O(sum_n leq xtau_k-1(n))$$
Using the induction hypothesis:
$$O(sum_n leq xtau_k-1(n)) = O(xP_k-1(log x) + O(x^1 - frac1k-1(log x)^k-3))$$
$$= O(x(log x)^k-2) + O(x^1 - frac1k-1(log x)^k-3)) = O(x(log x)^k-2)$$
Thus we get:
$$D_k(x) = xP_k(log x) + O(x^1- frac1k-1(log x)^k-3) + O(x(log x)^k-2)$$
$$= xP_k(log x)+O(x(log x)^k-2)$$
However, this error term is too large. How can I go about reducing it?
nt.number-theory analytic-number-theory divisors-multiples
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This question is not of research level (so it would be more suitable to ask at math.stackexchange.com), but Greg Martin gave an excellent answer. In general, consulting the textbooks before asking a question might be useful. BTW I used Dirichlet's hyperbola method for a recent MO question here: mathoverflow.net/questions/321839/…
$endgroup$
– GH from MO
Feb 2 at 23:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $tau_k(n)$ count the number of ways of representing $n$ as the product of $k$ natural numbers. It is known that:
$$D_k(x) = sum_n leq x tau_k(n) = xP_k(log x) + O(x ^1 - frac1k-1(log x)^k-2), ; forall k geq 2$$
Where $P_k$ is a polynomial of degree $k-1$ with leading coefficient $frac1(k-1)!$
I am asked to prove this. We may assume the base case as it is a well known result.
The assuming the result for all $l leq k$:
$$D_k(x) = sum_mn leq x tau_k-1(n) = sum_nleq xlfloorfracxnrfloortau_k-1(n)$$
$$= sum_n leq x(fracxn + O(1))tau_k-1(n) = xsum_n leq x fractau_k-1(n)n + O(sum_nleq xtau_k-1(n))$$
Using Abel's Summation formula, we may see that:
$$sum_n leq x fractau_k-1(n)n = P_k(log x) + O(x^frac-1k-1(log x)^k-3)$$
So:
$$D_k(x) = xP_k(log x) + O(x^1 - frac1k-1(log x)^k-3) + O(sum_n leq xtau_k-1(n))$$
Using the induction hypothesis:
$$O(sum_n leq xtau_k-1(n)) = O(xP_k-1(log x) + O(x^1 - frac1k-1(log x)^k-3))$$
$$= O(x(log x)^k-2) + O(x^1 - frac1k-1(log x)^k-3)) = O(x(log x)^k-2)$$
Thus we get:
$$D_k(x) = xP_k(log x) + O(x^1- frac1k-1(log x)^k-3) + O(x(log x)^k-2)$$
$$= xP_k(log x)+O(x(log x)^k-2)$$
However, this error term is too large. How can I go about reducing it?
nt.number-theory analytic-number-theory divisors-multiples
$endgroup$
Let $tau_k(n)$ count the number of ways of representing $n$ as the product of $k$ natural numbers. It is known that:
$$D_k(x) = sum_n leq x tau_k(n) = xP_k(log x) + O(x ^1 - frac1k-1(log x)^k-2), ; forall k geq 2$$
Where $P_k$ is a polynomial of degree $k-1$ with leading coefficient $frac1(k-1)!$
I am asked to prove this. We may assume the base case as it is a well known result.
The assuming the result for all $l leq k$:
$$D_k(x) = sum_mn leq x tau_k-1(n) = sum_nleq xlfloorfracxnrfloortau_k-1(n)$$
$$= sum_n leq x(fracxn + O(1))tau_k-1(n) = xsum_n leq x fractau_k-1(n)n + O(sum_nleq xtau_k-1(n))$$
Using Abel's Summation formula, we may see that:
$$sum_n leq x fractau_k-1(n)n = P_k(log x) + O(x^frac-1k-1(log x)^k-3)$$
So:
$$D_k(x) = xP_k(log x) + O(x^1 - frac1k-1(log x)^k-3) + O(sum_n leq xtau_k-1(n))$$
Using the induction hypothesis:
$$O(sum_n leq xtau_k-1(n)) = O(xP_k-1(log x) + O(x^1 - frac1k-1(log x)^k-3))$$
$$= O(x(log x)^k-2) + O(x^1 - frac1k-1(log x)^k-3)) = O(x(log x)^k-2)$$
Thus we get:
$$D_k(x) = xP_k(log x) + O(x^1- frac1k-1(log x)^k-3) + O(x(log x)^k-2)$$
$$= xP_k(log x)+O(x(log x)^k-2)$$
However, this error term is too large. How can I go about reducing it?
nt.number-theory analytic-number-theory divisors-multiples
nt.number-theory analytic-number-theory divisors-multiples
edited Feb 12 at 18:42
Martin Sleziak
3,06032128
3,06032128
asked Feb 2 at 21:36
user366818user366818
1163
1163
$begingroup$
This question is not of research level (so it would be more suitable to ask at math.stackexchange.com), but Greg Martin gave an excellent answer. In general, consulting the textbooks before asking a question might be useful. BTW I used Dirichlet's hyperbola method for a recent MO question here: mathoverflow.net/questions/321839/…
$endgroup$
– GH from MO
Feb 2 at 23:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This question is not of research level (so it would be more suitable to ask at math.stackexchange.com), but Greg Martin gave an excellent answer. In general, consulting the textbooks before asking a question might be useful. BTW I used Dirichlet's hyperbola method for a recent MO question here: mathoverflow.net/questions/321839/…
$endgroup$
– GH from MO
Feb 2 at 23:50
$begingroup$
This question is not of research level (so it would be more suitable to ask at math.stackexchange.com), but Greg Martin gave an excellent answer. In general, consulting the textbooks before asking a question might be useful. BTW I used Dirichlet's hyperbola method for a recent MO question here: mathoverflow.net/questions/321839/…
$endgroup$
– GH from MO
Feb 2 at 23:50
$begingroup$
This question is not of research level (so it would be more suitable to ask at math.stackexchange.com), but Greg Martin gave an excellent answer. In general, consulting the textbooks before asking a question might be useful. BTW I used Dirichlet's hyperbola method for a recent MO question here: mathoverflow.net/questions/321839/…
$endgroup$
– GH from MO
Feb 2 at 23:50
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You've discovered some of the primary motivation for the invention of the Dirichlet hyperbola method. Since $tau_k = tau_k-1*1$ (which you are already using), you can take advantage of the extra parameter ($U$ and $V$ in the linked document, instead of just $x$) to get a better error term—just as in the proof of the base case $k=2$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "504"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f322316%2fpiltz-divisor-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You've discovered some of the primary motivation for the invention of the Dirichlet hyperbola method. Since $tau_k = tau_k-1*1$ (which you are already using), you can take advantage of the extra parameter ($U$ and $V$ in the linked document, instead of just $x$) to get a better error term—just as in the proof of the base case $k=2$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You've discovered some of the primary motivation for the invention of the Dirichlet hyperbola method. Since $tau_k = tau_k-1*1$ (which you are already using), you can take advantage of the extra parameter ($U$ and $V$ in the linked document, instead of just $x$) to get a better error term—just as in the proof of the base case $k=2$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You've discovered some of the primary motivation for the invention of the Dirichlet hyperbola method. Since $tau_k = tau_k-1*1$ (which you are already using), you can take advantage of the extra parameter ($U$ and $V$ in the linked document, instead of just $x$) to get a better error term—just as in the proof of the base case $k=2$.
$endgroup$
You've discovered some of the primary motivation for the invention of the Dirichlet hyperbola method. Since $tau_k = tau_k-1*1$ (which you are already using), you can take advantage of the extra parameter ($U$ and $V$ in the linked document, instead of just $x$) to get a better error term—just as in the proof of the base case $k=2$.
answered Feb 2 at 21:53
Greg MartinGreg Martin
8,78813560
8,78813560
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f322316%2fpiltz-divisor-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
This question is not of research level (so it would be more suitable to ask at math.stackexchange.com), but Greg Martin gave an excellent answer. In general, consulting the textbooks before asking a question might be useful. BTW I used Dirichlet's hyperbola method for a recent MO question here: mathoverflow.net/questions/321839/…
$endgroup$
– GH from MO
Feb 2 at 23:50