What might this term (N sub C) be, calculating ripple current for a buck converter output capacitor?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












3












$begingroup$


I'm reading through the datasheet for TI's TPS54302 step-down converter, and determining values for support components.



There is a calculation to determine ripple current for the output capacitor which is:



$$
I_COUT(RMS) = frac1sqrt12 times left(
fracV_OUTtimes(V_IN(MAX)-V_OUT)
V_IN(MAX) times L_OUT times f_SW times N_C right)
$$

(Where $L_OUT$ is the inductor value (H), $f_SW$ is the switching frequency (Hz).)



I'm not sure what the term $N_C$ is meant to be.



Looking around online, other formulas omit this. For example, in this document by Rohm titled Capacitor Calculation for Buck Converter IC, page 4 has the formula:



$$
I_CO = frac1sqrt12 times left(
fracV_OUT(V_IN(MAX)-V_OUT)
L times f_SW times V_IN(MAX) right)
$$



Either I am ignorant of what $N_C$ is in this context (the datasheet doesn't clarify); the term is optional depending on application; or TI has a mistake in the datasheet.



What is $N_C$ in this case?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    3












    $begingroup$


    I'm reading through the datasheet for TI's TPS54302 step-down converter, and determining values for support components.



    There is a calculation to determine ripple current for the output capacitor which is:



    $$
    I_COUT(RMS) = frac1sqrt12 times left(
    fracV_OUTtimes(V_IN(MAX)-V_OUT)
    V_IN(MAX) times L_OUT times f_SW times N_C right)
    $$

    (Where $L_OUT$ is the inductor value (H), $f_SW$ is the switching frequency (Hz).)



    I'm not sure what the term $N_C$ is meant to be.



    Looking around online, other formulas omit this. For example, in this document by Rohm titled Capacitor Calculation for Buck Converter IC, page 4 has the formula:



    $$
    I_CO = frac1sqrt12 times left(
    fracV_OUT(V_IN(MAX)-V_OUT)
    L times f_SW times V_IN(MAX) right)
    $$



    Either I am ignorant of what $N_C$ is in this context (the datasheet doesn't clarify); the term is optional depending on application; or TI has a mistake in the datasheet.



    What is $N_C$ in this case?










    share|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$


      I'm reading through the datasheet for TI's TPS54302 step-down converter, and determining values for support components.



      There is a calculation to determine ripple current for the output capacitor which is:



      $$
      I_COUT(RMS) = frac1sqrt12 times left(
      fracV_OUTtimes(V_IN(MAX)-V_OUT)
      V_IN(MAX) times L_OUT times f_SW times N_C right)
      $$

      (Where $L_OUT$ is the inductor value (H), $f_SW$ is the switching frequency (Hz).)



      I'm not sure what the term $N_C$ is meant to be.



      Looking around online, other formulas omit this. For example, in this document by Rohm titled Capacitor Calculation for Buck Converter IC, page 4 has the formula:



      $$
      I_CO = frac1sqrt12 times left(
      fracV_OUT(V_IN(MAX)-V_OUT)
      L times f_SW times V_IN(MAX) right)
      $$



      Either I am ignorant of what $N_C$ is in this context (the datasheet doesn't clarify); the term is optional depending on application; or TI has a mistake in the datasheet.



      What is $N_C$ in this case?










      share|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I'm reading through the datasheet for TI's TPS54302 step-down converter, and determining values for support components.



      There is a calculation to determine ripple current for the output capacitor which is:



      $$
      I_COUT(RMS) = frac1sqrt12 times left(
      fracV_OUTtimes(V_IN(MAX)-V_OUT)
      V_IN(MAX) times L_OUT times f_SW times N_C right)
      $$

      (Where $L_OUT$ is the inductor value (H), $f_SW$ is the switching frequency (Hz).)



      I'm not sure what the term $N_C$ is meant to be.



      Looking around online, other formulas omit this. For example, in this document by Rohm titled Capacitor Calculation for Buck Converter IC, page 4 has the formula:



      $$
      I_CO = frac1sqrt12 times left(
      fracV_OUT(V_IN(MAX)-V_OUT)
      L times f_SW times V_IN(MAX) right)
      $$



      Either I am ignorant of what $N_C$ is in this context (the datasheet doesn't clarify); the term is optional depending on application; or TI has a mistake in the datasheet.



      What is $N_C$ in this case?







      capacitor buck ripple-current






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Jan 7 at 23:30









      JYeltonJYelton

      16k2890190




      16k2890190




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          9












          $begingroup$

          Most likely, number of capacitors.



          If you make your (for example) 100 uF output capacitance using three 33-uF capacitors in parallel, then the ripple current each one needs to handle is only 1/3 of the total ripple current.



          (Even though it doesn't look like the parameter is ever explained, nor is the possibility of multiple parallel capacitors discussed, the text immediately above the equation talks about the current for "each capacitor", implying that in some draft the author had the idea of using multiple capacitors, even if this didn't make it into the final version of the datasheet)






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            The data sheet doesn't say that $N_C$ is the number of output capacitors, but the schematic has two, and the text says that equation 15 gives the equation "for each capacitor". Bad technical writing style, there TI, to not name all your variables!
            $endgroup$
            – TimWescott
            Jan 8 at 1:04










          • $begingroup$
            Very intuitive thinking to understand other engineers with so-so math skills.
            $endgroup$
            – Sparky256
            Jan 8 at 7:14










          • $begingroup$
            In equation 9 (Page 15) they use the formula in question to derive IL(Max) and it appears they use a value of 0.8 for Nc, Am I missing something?
            $endgroup$
            – Tyler
            Jan 8 at 13:26










          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
          StackExchange.schematics.init();
          );
          , "cicuitlab");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "135"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f415780%2fwhat-might-this-term-n-sub-c-be-calculating-ripple-current-for-a-buck-convert%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          9












          $begingroup$

          Most likely, number of capacitors.



          If you make your (for example) 100 uF output capacitance using three 33-uF capacitors in parallel, then the ripple current each one needs to handle is only 1/3 of the total ripple current.



          (Even though it doesn't look like the parameter is ever explained, nor is the possibility of multiple parallel capacitors discussed, the text immediately above the equation talks about the current for "each capacitor", implying that in some draft the author had the idea of using multiple capacitors, even if this didn't make it into the final version of the datasheet)






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            The data sheet doesn't say that $N_C$ is the number of output capacitors, but the schematic has two, and the text says that equation 15 gives the equation "for each capacitor". Bad technical writing style, there TI, to not name all your variables!
            $endgroup$
            – TimWescott
            Jan 8 at 1:04










          • $begingroup$
            Very intuitive thinking to understand other engineers with so-so math skills.
            $endgroup$
            – Sparky256
            Jan 8 at 7:14










          • $begingroup$
            In equation 9 (Page 15) they use the formula in question to derive IL(Max) and it appears they use a value of 0.8 for Nc, Am I missing something?
            $endgroup$
            – Tyler
            Jan 8 at 13:26















          9












          $begingroup$

          Most likely, number of capacitors.



          If you make your (for example) 100 uF output capacitance using three 33-uF capacitors in parallel, then the ripple current each one needs to handle is only 1/3 of the total ripple current.



          (Even though it doesn't look like the parameter is ever explained, nor is the possibility of multiple parallel capacitors discussed, the text immediately above the equation talks about the current for "each capacitor", implying that in some draft the author had the idea of using multiple capacitors, even if this didn't make it into the final version of the datasheet)






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            The data sheet doesn't say that $N_C$ is the number of output capacitors, but the schematic has two, and the text says that equation 15 gives the equation "for each capacitor". Bad technical writing style, there TI, to not name all your variables!
            $endgroup$
            – TimWescott
            Jan 8 at 1:04










          • $begingroup$
            Very intuitive thinking to understand other engineers with so-so math skills.
            $endgroup$
            – Sparky256
            Jan 8 at 7:14










          • $begingroup$
            In equation 9 (Page 15) they use the formula in question to derive IL(Max) and it appears they use a value of 0.8 for Nc, Am I missing something?
            $endgroup$
            – Tyler
            Jan 8 at 13:26













          9












          9








          9





          $begingroup$

          Most likely, number of capacitors.



          If you make your (for example) 100 uF output capacitance using three 33-uF capacitors in parallel, then the ripple current each one needs to handle is only 1/3 of the total ripple current.



          (Even though it doesn't look like the parameter is ever explained, nor is the possibility of multiple parallel capacitors discussed, the text immediately above the equation talks about the current for "each capacitor", implying that in some draft the author had the idea of using multiple capacitors, even if this didn't make it into the final version of the datasheet)






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Most likely, number of capacitors.



          If you make your (for example) 100 uF output capacitance using three 33-uF capacitors in parallel, then the ripple current each one needs to handle is only 1/3 of the total ripple current.



          (Even though it doesn't look like the parameter is ever explained, nor is the possibility of multiple parallel capacitors discussed, the text immediately above the equation talks about the current for "each capacitor", implying that in some draft the author had the idea of using multiple capacitors, even if this didn't make it into the final version of the datasheet)







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Jan 8 at 0:02









          The PhotonThe Photon

          84.3k397196




          84.3k397196











          • $begingroup$
            The data sheet doesn't say that $N_C$ is the number of output capacitors, but the schematic has two, and the text says that equation 15 gives the equation "for each capacitor". Bad technical writing style, there TI, to not name all your variables!
            $endgroup$
            – TimWescott
            Jan 8 at 1:04










          • $begingroup$
            Very intuitive thinking to understand other engineers with so-so math skills.
            $endgroup$
            – Sparky256
            Jan 8 at 7:14










          • $begingroup$
            In equation 9 (Page 15) they use the formula in question to derive IL(Max) and it appears they use a value of 0.8 for Nc, Am I missing something?
            $endgroup$
            – Tyler
            Jan 8 at 13:26
















          • $begingroup$
            The data sheet doesn't say that $N_C$ is the number of output capacitors, but the schematic has two, and the text says that equation 15 gives the equation "for each capacitor". Bad technical writing style, there TI, to not name all your variables!
            $endgroup$
            – TimWescott
            Jan 8 at 1:04










          • $begingroup$
            Very intuitive thinking to understand other engineers with so-so math skills.
            $endgroup$
            – Sparky256
            Jan 8 at 7:14










          • $begingroup$
            In equation 9 (Page 15) they use the formula in question to derive IL(Max) and it appears they use a value of 0.8 for Nc, Am I missing something?
            $endgroup$
            – Tyler
            Jan 8 at 13:26















          $begingroup$
          The data sheet doesn't say that $N_C$ is the number of output capacitors, but the schematic has two, and the text says that equation 15 gives the equation "for each capacitor". Bad technical writing style, there TI, to not name all your variables!
          $endgroup$
          – TimWescott
          Jan 8 at 1:04




          $begingroup$
          The data sheet doesn't say that $N_C$ is the number of output capacitors, but the schematic has two, and the text says that equation 15 gives the equation "for each capacitor". Bad technical writing style, there TI, to not name all your variables!
          $endgroup$
          – TimWescott
          Jan 8 at 1:04












          $begingroup$
          Very intuitive thinking to understand other engineers with so-so math skills.
          $endgroup$
          – Sparky256
          Jan 8 at 7:14




          $begingroup$
          Very intuitive thinking to understand other engineers with so-so math skills.
          $endgroup$
          – Sparky256
          Jan 8 at 7:14












          $begingroup$
          In equation 9 (Page 15) they use the formula in question to derive IL(Max) and it appears they use a value of 0.8 for Nc, Am I missing something?
          $endgroup$
          – Tyler
          Jan 8 at 13:26




          $begingroup$
          In equation 9 (Page 15) they use the formula in question to derive IL(Max) and it appears they use a value of 0.8 for Nc, Am I missing something?
          $endgroup$
          – Tyler
          Jan 8 at 13:26

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f415780%2fwhat-might-this-term-n-sub-c-be-calculating-ripple-current-for-a-buck-convert%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown






          Popular posts from this blog

          How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

          Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

          How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?