“Ocular” versus “Optical”
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
I am writing a SciFi novel in which military officers have electronic lenses implanted in their eyes to act as a tactical overlay. It is likely of little consequence, but I am unsure whether or not to call these an Ocular Implant or an Optical Implant, as the words are similar in meaning, but one might imply that the implant is a replacement of the eye with a bionic implant instead of just the lenses.
Is the wording of much consequence in this case?
If so, which would be more appropriate?
To be a bit more specific, I have already written quite a bit using the words interchangeably. Recently it has come to my attention that it could be confusing if the audience thinks everyone is walking around with robotic eyes. I just need to know if it is a distinct enough difference to bother going back and changing everything to the same adjective.
word-choice
add a comment |
I am writing a SciFi novel in which military officers have electronic lenses implanted in their eyes to act as a tactical overlay. It is likely of little consequence, but I am unsure whether or not to call these an Ocular Implant or an Optical Implant, as the words are similar in meaning, but one might imply that the implant is a replacement of the eye with a bionic implant instead of just the lenses.
Is the wording of much consequence in this case?
If so, which would be more appropriate?
To be a bit more specific, I have already written quite a bit using the words interchangeably. Recently it has come to my attention that it could be confusing if the audience thinks everyone is walking around with robotic eyes. I just need to know if it is a distinct enough difference to bother going back and changing everything to the same adjective.
word-choice
add a comment |
I am writing a SciFi novel in which military officers have electronic lenses implanted in their eyes to act as a tactical overlay. It is likely of little consequence, but I am unsure whether or not to call these an Ocular Implant or an Optical Implant, as the words are similar in meaning, but one might imply that the implant is a replacement of the eye with a bionic implant instead of just the lenses.
Is the wording of much consequence in this case?
If so, which would be more appropriate?
To be a bit more specific, I have already written quite a bit using the words interchangeably. Recently it has come to my attention that it could be confusing if the audience thinks everyone is walking around with robotic eyes. I just need to know if it is a distinct enough difference to bother going back and changing everything to the same adjective.
word-choice
I am writing a SciFi novel in which military officers have electronic lenses implanted in their eyes to act as a tactical overlay. It is likely of little consequence, but I am unsure whether or not to call these an Ocular Implant or an Optical Implant, as the words are similar in meaning, but one might imply that the implant is a replacement of the eye with a bionic implant instead of just the lenses.
Is the wording of much consequence in this case?
If so, which would be more appropriate?
To be a bit more specific, I have already written quite a bit using the words interchangeably. Recently it has come to my attention that it could be confusing if the audience thinks everyone is walking around with robotic eyes. I just need to know if it is a distinct enough difference to bother going back and changing everything to the same adjective.
word-choice
word-choice
asked Jan 7 at 21:52
TitaniumTurtleTitaniumTurtle
1756
1756
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
I would definitely suggest going back through and making the adjectives consistent. If you use two different adjectives, readers are likely to think they're two different things.
Which to choose is up to you. I'm pretty sure I've heard both in different sci-fi universes. For the record, the technical term for such a thing in real life is an intraocular lens.
Although the other answers were also very good, I ended up going with this one because the link to modern day intraocular lenses is a perfect basis for their technological evolution. On that same line I have since converted all references to "ocular" because it is most similar to the actual terminology. Thanks.
– TitaniumTurtle
Jan 10 at 2:58
add a comment |
The difference in meaning may help you determine which term you want to use. Optical relates to sight, whereas ocular relates to the eye.
If your lenses are primarily intended to aid or affect "sight", or is primarily based on the manipulation of light, then optical might be a better term. (An example might be a zoomable lens for long-range reconnaissance or aim.)
If the lenses are primarily intended for some other purpose, and their effect on "sight" is incidental, then the fact that they are located on the eye is the only relevant factor, and calling them ocular (or intraocular, as eyeballfrog suggests) may be better. (An example might be an augmented reality display which adds information about the scene - in this case, the fact that it's eye-mounted rather than head-mounted like AR glasses is relevant.)
Optical more accurately refers to light, regardless of whether any humans are around to see it.
– Tashus
Jan 8 at 20:02
1
@Tashus I used en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/optical which suggests sight rather than light. (The second definition does refer to visible light, but it's only in Physics contexts...)
– Stobor
Jan 9 at 2:22
1
@Tashus - Actually, cross-checking with dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/optical and merriam-webster.com/dictionary/optical suggests regional variations in the usage.
– Stobor
Jan 9 at 2:23
@Stober ah, I wasn't aware of regional differences. I am also used to the term in an engineering context and didn't consider its broader meaning. You have my upvote regardless.
– Tashus
Jan 9 at 14:06
add a comment |
Based on the purpose of the implant, Ocular Implant seems like a better name. However, avoid using the terms Ocular Implant and Optical Implant interchangeably. When reading sci-fi novels, readers tend to keep track of tech in terms of keywords so it is important to maintain constant terminology throughout your story.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "166"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwriting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f41105%2focular-versus-optical%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I would definitely suggest going back through and making the adjectives consistent. If you use two different adjectives, readers are likely to think they're two different things.
Which to choose is up to you. I'm pretty sure I've heard both in different sci-fi universes. For the record, the technical term for such a thing in real life is an intraocular lens.
Although the other answers were also very good, I ended up going with this one because the link to modern day intraocular lenses is a perfect basis for their technological evolution. On that same line I have since converted all references to "ocular" because it is most similar to the actual terminology. Thanks.
– TitaniumTurtle
Jan 10 at 2:58
add a comment |
I would definitely suggest going back through and making the adjectives consistent. If you use two different adjectives, readers are likely to think they're two different things.
Which to choose is up to you. I'm pretty sure I've heard both in different sci-fi universes. For the record, the technical term for such a thing in real life is an intraocular lens.
Although the other answers were also very good, I ended up going with this one because the link to modern day intraocular lenses is a perfect basis for their technological evolution. On that same line I have since converted all references to "ocular" because it is most similar to the actual terminology. Thanks.
– TitaniumTurtle
Jan 10 at 2:58
add a comment |
I would definitely suggest going back through and making the adjectives consistent. If you use two different adjectives, readers are likely to think they're two different things.
Which to choose is up to you. I'm pretty sure I've heard both in different sci-fi universes. For the record, the technical term for such a thing in real life is an intraocular lens.
I would definitely suggest going back through and making the adjectives consistent. If you use two different adjectives, readers are likely to think they're two different things.
Which to choose is up to you. I'm pretty sure I've heard both in different sci-fi universes. For the record, the technical term for such a thing in real life is an intraocular lens.
answered Jan 7 at 22:17
eyeballfrogeyeballfrog
1,0881311
1,0881311
Although the other answers were also very good, I ended up going with this one because the link to modern day intraocular lenses is a perfect basis for their technological evolution. On that same line I have since converted all references to "ocular" because it is most similar to the actual terminology. Thanks.
– TitaniumTurtle
Jan 10 at 2:58
add a comment |
Although the other answers were also very good, I ended up going with this one because the link to modern day intraocular lenses is a perfect basis for their technological evolution. On that same line I have since converted all references to "ocular" because it is most similar to the actual terminology. Thanks.
– TitaniumTurtle
Jan 10 at 2:58
Although the other answers were also very good, I ended up going with this one because the link to modern day intraocular lenses is a perfect basis for their technological evolution. On that same line I have since converted all references to "ocular" because it is most similar to the actual terminology. Thanks.
– TitaniumTurtle
Jan 10 at 2:58
Although the other answers were also very good, I ended up going with this one because the link to modern day intraocular lenses is a perfect basis for their technological evolution. On that same line I have since converted all references to "ocular" because it is most similar to the actual terminology. Thanks.
– TitaniumTurtle
Jan 10 at 2:58
add a comment |
The difference in meaning may help you determine which term you want to use. Optical relates to sight, whereas ocular relates to the eye.
If your lenses are primarily intended to aid or affect "sight", or is primarily based on the manipulation of light, then optical might be a better term. (An example might be a zoomable lens for long-range reconnaissance or aim.)
If the lenses are primarily intended for some other purpose, and their effect on "sight" is incidental, then the fact that they are located on the eye is the only relevant factor, and calling them ocular (or intraocular, as eyeballfrog suggests) may be better. (An example might be an augmented reality display which adds information about the scene - in this case, the fact that it's eye-mounted rather than head-mounted like AR glasses is relevant.)
Optical more accurately refers to light, regardless of whether any humans are around to see it.
– Tashus
Jan 8 at 20:02
1
@Tashus I used en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/optical which suggests sight rather than light. (The second definition does refer to visible light, but it's only in Physics contexts...)
– Stobor
Jan 9 at 2:22
1
@Tashus - Actually, cross-checking with dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/optical and merriam-webster.com/dictionary/optical suggests regional variations in the usage.
– Stobor
Jan 9 at 2:23
@Stober ah, I wasn't aware of regional differences. I am also used to the term in an engineering context and didn't consider its broader meaning. You have my upvote regardless.
– Tashus
Jan 9 at 14:06
add a comment |
The difference in meaning may help you determine which term you want to use. Optical relates to sight, whereas ocular relates to the eye.
If your lenses are primarily intended to aid or affect "sight", or is primarily based on the manipulation of light, then optical might be a better term. (An example might be a zoomable lens for long-range reconnaissance or aim.)
If the lenses are primarily intended for some other purpose, and their effect on "sight" is incidental, then the fact that they are located on the eye is the only relevant factor, and calling them ocular (or intraocular, as eyeballfrog suggests) may be better. (An example might be an augmented reality display which adds information about the scene - in this case, the fact that it's eye-mounted rather than head-mounted like AR glasses is relevant.)
Optical more accurately refers to light, regardless of whether any humans are around to see it.
– Tashus
Jan 8 at 20:02
1
@Tashus I used en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/optical which suggests sight rather than light. (The second definition does refer to visible light, but it's only in Physics contexts...)
– Stobor
Jan 9 at 2:22
1
@Tashus - Actually, cross-checking with dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/optical and merriam-webster.com/dictionary/optical suggests regional variations in the usage.
– Stobor
Jan 9 at 2:23
@Stober ah, I wasn't aware of regional differences. I am also used to the term in an engineering context and didn't consider its broader meaning. You have my upvote regardless.
– Tashus
Jan 9 at 14:06
add a comment |
The difference in meaning may help you determine which term you want to use. Optical relates to sight, whereas ocular relates to the eye.
If your lenses are primarily intended to aid or affect "sight", or is primarily based on the manipulation of light, then optical might be a better term. (An example might be a zoomable lens for long-range reconnaissance or aim.)
If the lenses are primarily intended for some other purpose, and their effect on "sight" is incidental, then the fact that they are located on the eye is the only relevant factor, and calling them ocular (or intraocular, as eyeballfrog suggests) may be better. (An example might be an augmented reality display which adds information about the scene - in this case, the fact that it's eye-mounted rather than head-mounted like AR glasses is relevant.)
The difference in meaning may help you determine which term you want to use. Optical relates to sight, whereas ocular relates to the eye.
If your lenses are primarily intended to aid or affect "sight", or is primarily based on the manipulation of light, then optical might be a better term. (An example might be a zoomable lens for long-range reconnaissance or aim.)
If the lenses are primarily intended for some other purpose, and their effect on "sight" is incidental, then the fact that they are located on the eye is the only relevant factor, and calling them ocular (or intraocular, as eyeballfrog suggests) may be better. (An example might be an augmented reality display which adds information about the scene - in this case, the fact that it's eye-mounted rather than head-mounted like AR glasses is relevant.)
edited Jan 9 at 2:25
answered Jan 8 at 3:33
StoborStobor
1513
1513
Optical more accurately refers to light, regardless of whether any humans are around to see it.
– Tashus
Jan 8 at 20:02
1
@Tashus I used en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/optical which suggests sight rather than light. (The second definition does refer to visible light, but it's only in Physics contexts...)
– Stobor
Jan 9 at 2:22
1
@Tashus - Actually, cross-checking with dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/optical and merriam-webster.com/dictionary/optical suggests regional variations in the usage.
– Stobor
Jan 9 at 2:23
@Stober ah, I wasn't aware of regional differences. I am also used to the term in an engineering context and didn't consider its broader meaning. You have my upvote regardless.
– Tashus
Jan 9 at 14:06
add a comment |
Optical more accurately refers to light, regardless of whether any humans are around to see it.
– Tashus
Jan 8 at 20:02
1
@Tashus I used en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/optical which suggests sight rather than light. (The second definition does refer to visible light, but it's only in Physics contexts...)
– Stobor
Jan 9 at 2:22
1
@Tashus - Actually, cross-checking with dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/optical and merriam-webster.com/dictionary/optical suggests regional variations in the usage.
– Stobor
Jan 9 at 2:23
@Stober ah, I wasn't aware of regional differences. I am also used to the term in an engineering context and didn't consider its broader meaning. You have my upvote regardless.
– Tashus
Jan 9 at 14:06
Optical more accurately refers to light, regardless of whether any humans are around to see it.
– Tashus
Jan 8 at 20:02
Optical more accurately refers to light, regardless of whether any humans are around to see it.
– Tashus
Jan 8 at 20:02
1
1
@Tashus I used en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/optical which suggests sight rather than light. (The second definition does refer to visible light, but it's only in Physics contexts...)
– Stobor
Jan 9 at 2:22
@Tashus I used en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/optical which suggests sight rather than light. (The second definition does refer to visible light, but it's only in Physics contexts...)
– Stobor
Jan 9 at 2:22
1
1
@Tashus - Actually, cross-checking with dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/optical and merriam-webster.com/dictionary/optical suggests regional variations in the usage.
– Stobor
Jan 9 at 2:23
@Tashus - Actually, cross-checking with dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/optical and merriam-webster.com/dictionary/optical suggests regional variations in the usage.
– Stobor
Jan 9 at 2:23
@Stober ah, I wasn't aware of regional differences. I am also used to the term in an engineering context and didn't consider its broader meaning. You have my upvote regardless.
– Tashus
Jan 9 at 14:06
@Stober ah, I wasn't aware of regional differences. I am also used to the term in an engineering context and didn't consider its broader meaning. You have my upvote regardless.
– Tashus
Jan 9 at 14:06
add a comment |
Based on the purpose of the implant, Ocular Implant seems like a better name. However, avoid using the terms Ocular Implant and Optical Implant interchangeably. When reading sci-fi novels, readers tend to keep track of tech in terms of keywords so it is important to maintain constant terminology throughout your story.
add a comment |
Based on the purpose of the implant, Ocular Implant seems like a better name. However, avoid using the terms Ocular Implant and Optical Implant interchangeably. When reading sci-fi novels, readers tend to keep track of tech in terms of keywords so it is important to maintain constant terminology throughout your story.
add a comment |
Based on the purpose of the implant, Ocular Implant seems like a better name. However, avoid using the terms Ocular Implant and Optical Implant interchangeably. When reading sci-fi novels, readers tend to keep track of tech in terms of keywords so it is important to maintain constant terminology throughout your story.
Based on the purpose of the implant, Ocular Implant seems like a better name. However, avoid using the terms Ocular Implant and Optical Implant interchangeably. When reading sci-fi novels, readers tend to keep track of tech in terms of keywords so it is important to maintain constant terminology throughout your story.
answered Jan 8 at 8:37
bkirthibkirthi
212
212
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Writing Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwriting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f41105%2focular-versus-optical%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown