Is it possible to multiply a set by a natural number? [closed]

Multi tool use
Multi tool use

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












8












$begingroup$


Say I have a set $S=1, 4, 10, 7$. Could I then multiply $S$ by $3$? Would that then look like $3S=3, 12, 30, 21$? Any help would be really appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



closed as off-topic by BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft, DRF, Cesareo, amWhy, Adrian Keister Jan 8 at 19:57


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – DRF, amWhy, Adrian Keister
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.








  • 12




    $begingroup$
    Yes you could just define $$na_i=na_i$$
    $endgroup$
    – clathratus
    Jan 8 at 5:26






  • 13




    $begingroup$
    You can certainly take a set of numbers $S= 1,4,10,7$ and say "Hey, I'm going to multiply every element by $3$ and get the set $3,12,20,21$ and I'm going to call that set $3S$". And you can say "I'm going to refer to that as multiplying a set by a number, any objections? No? Good."
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    Jan 8 at 5:37






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    I'm not sure what is being asked here. You can most certainly do anything you want in maths (assuming logically valid). Are you asking about usefulness of this construction?
    $endgroup$
    – freakish
    Jan 8 at 7:45







  • 22




    $begingroup$
    @fleablood I do have an objection since $3 times 10 = 30$
    $endgroup$
    – F.Carette
    Jan 8 at 8:46






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Hello and welcome to Math Stack exchange. What is your background? Where did you come across this notation or problem? Especially for a problem like this context is very important.
    $endgroup$
    – DRF
    Jan 8 at 14:26















8












$begingroup$


Say I have a set $S=1, 4, 10, 7$. Could I then multiply $S$ by $3$? Would that then look like $3S=3, 12, 30, 21$? Any help would be really appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



closed as off-topic by BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft, DRF, Cesareo, amWhy, Adrian Keister Jan 8 at 19:57


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – DRF, amWhy, Adrian Keister
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.








  • 12




    $begingroup$
    Yes you could just define $$na_i=na_i$$
    $endgroup$
    – clathratus
    Jan 8 at 5:26






  • 13




    $begingroup$
    You can certainly take a set of numbers $S= 1,4,10,7$ and say "Hey, I'm going to multiply every element by $3$ and get the set $3,12,20,21$ and I'm going to call that set $3S$". And you can say "I'm going to refer to that as multiplying a set by a number, any objections? No? Good."
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    Jan 8 at 5:37






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    I'm not sure what is being asked here. You can most certainly do anything you want in maths (assuming logically valid). Are you asking about usefulness of this construction?
    $endgroup$
    – freakish
    Jan 8 at 7:45







  • 22




    $begingroup$
    @fleablood I do have an objection since $3 times 10 = 30$
    $endgroup$
    – F.Carette
    Jan 8 at 8:46






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Hello and welcome to Math Stack exchange. What is your background? Where did you come across this notation or problem? Especially for a problem like this context is very important.
    $endgroup$
    – DRF
    Jan 8 at 14:26













8












8








8


1



$begingroup$


Say I have a set $S=1, 4, 10, 7$. Could I then multiply $S$ by $3$? Would that then look like $3S=3, 12, 30, 21$? Any help would be really appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Say I have a set $S=1, 4, 10, 7$. Could I then multiply $S$ by $3$? Would that then look like $3S=3, 12, 30, 21$? Any help would be really appreciated.







discrete-mathematics elementary-set-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 8 at 5:26









clathratus

3,730333




3,730333










asked Jan 8 at 5:01









Hunter KimuraHunter Kimura

502




502




closed as off-topic by BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft, DRF, Cesareo, amWhy, Adrian Keister Jan 8 at 19:57


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – DRF, amWhy, Adrian Keister
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




closed as off-topic by BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft, DRF, Cesareo, amWhy, Adrian Keister Jan 8 at 19:57


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – DRF, amWhy, Adrian Keister
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







  • 12




    $begingroup$
    Yes you could just define $$na_i=na_i$$
    $endgroup$
    – clathratus
    Jan 8 at 5:26






  • 13




    $begingroup$
    You can certainly take a set of numbers $S= 1,4,10,7$ and say "Hey, I'm going to multiply every element by $3$ and get the set $3,12,20,21$ and I'm going to call that set $3S$". And you can say "I'm going to refer to that as multiplying a set by a number, any objections? No? Good."
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    Jan 8 at 5:37






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    I'm not sure what is being asked here. You can most certainly do anything you want in maths (assuming logically valid). Are you asking about usefulness of this construction?
    $endgroup$
    – freakish
    Jan 8 at 7:45







  • 22




    $begingroup$
    @fleablood I do have an objection since $3 times 10 = 30$
    $endgroup$
    – F.Carette
    Jan 8 at 8:46






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Hello and welcome to Math Stack exchange. What is your background? Where did you come across this notation or problem? Especially for a problem like this context is very important.
    $endgroup$
    – DRF
    Jan 8 at 14:26












  • 12




    $begingroup$
    Yes you could just define $$na_i=na_i$$
    $endgroup$
    – clathratus
    Jan 8 at 5:26






  • 13




    $begingroup$
    You can certainly take a set of numbers $S= 1,4,10,7$ and say "Hey, I'm going to multiply every element by $3$ and get the set $3,12,20,21$ and I'm going to call that set $3S$". And you can say "I'm going to refer to that as multiplying a set by a number, any objections? No? Good."
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    Jan 8 at 5:37






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    I'm not sure what is being asked here. You can most certainly do anything you want in maths (assuming logically valid). Are you asking about usefulness of this construction?
    $endgroup$
    – freakish
    Jan 8 at 7:45







  • 22




    $begingroup$
    @fleablood I do have an objection since $3 times 10 = 30$
    $endgroup$
    – F.Carette
    Jan 8 at 8:46






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Hello and welcome to Math Stack exchange. What is your background? Where did you come across this notation or problem? Especially for a problem like this context is very important.
    $endgroup$
    – DRF
    Jan 8 at 14:26







12




12




$begingroup$
Yes you could just define $$na_i=na_i$$
$endgroup$
– clathratus
Jan 8 at 5:26




$begingroup$
Yes you could just define $$na_i=na_i$$
$endgroup$
– clathratus
Jan 8 at 5:26




13




13




$begingroup$
You can certainly take a set of numbers $S= 1,4,10,7$ and say "Hey, I'm going to multiply every element by $3$ and get the set $3,12,20,21$ and I'm going to call that set $3S$". And you can say "I'm going to refer to that as multiplying a set by a number, any objections? No? Good."
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Jan 8 at 5:37




$begingroup$
You can certainly take a set of numbers $S= 1,4,10,7$ and say "Hey, I'm going to multiply every element by $3$ and get the set $3,12,20,21$ and I'm going to call that set $3S$". And you can say "I'm going to refer to that as multiplying a set by a number, any objections? No? Good."
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Jan 8 at 5:37




5




5




$begingroup$
I'm not sure what is being asked here. You can most certainly do anything you want in maths (assuming logically valid). Are you asking about usefulness of this construction?
$endgroup$
– freakish
Jan 8 at 7:45





$begingroup$
I'm not sure what is being asked here. You can most certainly do anything you want in maths (assuming logically valid). Are you asking about usefulness of this construction?
$endgroup$
– freakish
Jan 8 at 7:45





22




22




$begingroup$
@fleablood I do have an objection since $3 times 10 = 30$
$endgroup$
– F.Carette
Jan 8 at 8:46




$begingroup$
@fleablood I do have an objection since $3 times 10 = 30$
$endgroup$
– F.Carette
Jan 8 at 8:46




1




1




$begingroup$
Hello and welcome to Math Stack exchange. What is your background? Where did you come across this notation or problem? Especially for a problem like this context is very important.
$endgroup$
– DRF
Jan 8 at 14:26




$begingroup$
Hello and welcome to Math Stack exchange. What is your background? Where did you come across this notation or problem? Especially for a problem like this context is very important.
$endgroup$
– DRF
Jan 8 at 14:26










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















23












$begingroup$

Sure, we sometimes for example denote the set of even integers by $2Bbb Z=dots,-4,-2,0,2,4,dots$, while the set of integers is $Bbb Z=dots,-2,-1,0,1,2,dots$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    7












    $begingroup$

    Yes..you have already defined the operation..a scalar multiplication on a set.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$




















      6












      $begingroup$

      In fact, this is closely related to images of functions:




      Let $f: A to B$ be a function between two sets and $A' subseteq A$, then we define
      $$f[A'] := a in A'quad left(= b in B right)$$




      Your idea is a specific instance:




      Let $A' = 1, 4, 10, 7 subseteq mathbbN =: A$ and $f: mathbbN to mathbbN$ be the operation "multiply by three", then
      $$f[A'] = 3, 12, 30, 21$$




      The other answer hints at the notation $NA'$, e.g. $3A'$.



      Note that in general only $|A'| geq |f[A']|$ holds, e.g. consider $0mathbbZ = 0$. However, with this "function framework", it is easy to state a criterion for when the equality holds:




      If $f$ is injective on $A'$, then $|A'| = |f[A']|$.




      Or in words: "If you map different elements in $A'$ to different elements in $B$, then certainly, we cannot lose elements due to duplicates in the set $f[A']$."



      Can you see why $|2mathbbZ| = |mathbbZ|$? This proves "there are as many even numbers as integers". (Of course, you have to first define the cardinality function $|cdot|$ for arbitrary infinite sets first.)






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$



















        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes








        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        23












        $begingroup$

        Sure, we sometimes for example denote the set of even integers by $2Bbb Z=dots,-4,-2,0,2,4,dots$, while the set of integers is $Bbb Z=dots,-2,-1,0,1,2,dots$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$

















          23












          $begingroup$

          Sure, we sometimes for example denote the set of even integers by $2Bbb Z=dots,-4,-2,0,2,4,dots$, while the set of integers is $Bbb Z=dots,-2,-1,0,1,2,dots$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$















            23












            23








            23





            $begingroup$

            Sure, we sometimes for example denote the set of even integers by $2Bbb Z=dots,-4,-2,0,2,4,dots$, while the set of integers is $Bbb Z=dots,-2,-1,0,1,2,dots$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Sure, we sometimes for example denote the set of even integers by $2Bbb Z=dots,-4,-2,0,2,4,dots$, while the set of integers is $Bbb Z=dots,-2,-1,0,1,2,dots$.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Jan 8 at 5:04









            John DoeJohn Doe

            11.1k11238




            11.1k11238





















                7












                $begingroup$

                Yes..you have already defined the operation..a scalar multiplication on a set.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$

















                  7












                  $begingroup$

                  Yes..you have already defined the operation..a scalar multiplication on a set.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$















                    7












                    7








                    7





                    $begingroup$

                    Yes..you have already defined the operation..a scalar multiplication on a set.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    Yes..you have already defined the operation..a scalar multiplication on a set.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered Jan 8 at 5:03









                    ershersh

                    320112




                    320112





















                        6












                        $begingroup$

                        In fact, this is closely related to images of functions:




                        Let $f: A to B$ be a function between two sets and $A' subseteq A$, then we define
                        $$f[A'] := a in A'quad left(= b in B right)$$




                        Your idea is a specific instance:




                        Let $A' = 1, 4, 10, 7 subseteq mathbbN =: A$ and $f: mathbbN to mathbbN$ be the operation "multiply by three", then
                        $$f[A'] = 3, 12, 30, 21$$




                        The other answer hints at the notation $NA'$, e.g. $3A'$.



                        Note that in general only $|A'| geq |f[A']|$ holds, e.g. consider $0mathbbZ = 0$. However, with this "function framework", it is easy to state a criterion for when the equality holds:




                        If $f$ is injective on $A'$, then $|A'| = |f[A']|$.




                        Or in words: "If you map different elements in $A'$ to different elements in $B$, then certainly, we cannot lose elements due to duplicates in the set $f[A']$."



                        Can you see why $|2mathbbZ| = |mathbbZ|$? This proves "there are as many even numbers as integers". (Of course, you have to first define the cardinality function $|cdot|$ for arbitrary infinite sets first.)






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$

















                          6












                          $begingroup$

                          In fact, this is closely related to images of functions:




                          Let $f: A to B$ be a function between two sets and $A' subseteq A$, then we define
                          $$f[A'] := a in A'quad left(= b in B right)$$




                          Your idea is a specific instance:




                          Let $A' = 1, 4, 10, 7 subseteq mathbbN =: A$ and $f: mathbbN to mathbbN$ be the operation "multiply by three", then
                          $$f[A'] = 3, 12, 30, 21$$




                          The other answer hints at the notation $NA'$, e.g. $3A'$.



                          Note that in general only $|A'| geq |f[A']|$ holds, e.g. consider $0mathbbZ = 0$. However, with this "function framework", it is easy to state a criterion for when the equality holds:




                          If $f$ is injective on $A'$, then $|A'| = |f[A']|$.




                          Or in words: "If you map different elements in $A'$ to different elements in $B$, then certainly, we cannot lose elements due to duplicates in the set $f[A']$."



                          Can you see why $|2mathbbZ| = |mathbbZ|$? This proves "there are as many even numbers as integers". (Of course, you have to first define the cardinality function $|cdot|$ for arbitrary infinite sets first.)






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$















                            6












                            6








                            6





                            $begingroup$

                            In fact, this is closely related to images of functions:




                            Let $f: A to B$ be a function between two sets and $A' subseteq A$, then we define
                            $$f[A'] := a in A'quad left(= b in B right)$$




                            Your idea is a specific instance:




                            Let $A' = 1, 4, 10, 7 subseteq mathbbN =: A$ and $f: mathbbN to mathbbN$ be the operation "multiply by three", then
                            $$f[A'] = 3, 12, 30, 21$$




                            The other answer hints at the notation $NA'$, e.g. $3A'$.



                            Note that in general only $|A'| geq |f[A']|$ holds, e.g. consider $0mathbbZ = 0$. However, with this "function framework", it is easy to state a criterion for when the equality holds:




                            If $f$ is injective on $A'$, then $|A'| = |f[A']|$.




                            Or in words: "If you map different elements in $A'$ to different elements in $B$, then certainly, we cannot lose elements due to duplicates in the set $f[A']$."



                            Can you see why $|2mathbbZ| = |mathbbZ|$? This proves "there are as many even numbers as integers". (Of course, you have to first define the cardinality function $|cdot|$ for arbitrary infinite sets first.)






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            In fact, this is closely related to images of functions:




                            Let $f: A to B$ be a function between two sets and $A' subseteq A$, then we define
                            $$f[A'] := a in A'quad left(= b in B right)$$




                            Your idea is a specific instance:




                            Let $A' = 1, 4, 10, 7 subseteq mathbbN =: A$ and $f: mathbbN to mathbbN$ be the operation "multiply by three", then
                            $$f[A'] = 3, 12, 30, 21$$




                            The other answer hints at the notation $NA'$, e.g. $3A'$.



                            Note that in general only $|A'| geq |f[A']|$ holds, e.g. consider $0mathbbZ = 0$. However, with this "function framework", it is easy to state a criterion for when the equality holds:




                            If $f$ is injective on $A'$, then $|A'| = |f[A']|$.




                            Or in words: "If you map different elements in $A'$ to different elements in $B$, then certainly, we cannot lose elements due to duplicates in the set $f[A']$."



                            Can you see why $|2mathbbZ| = |mathbbZ|$? This proves "there are as many even numbers as integers". (Of course, you have to first define the cardinality function $|cdot|$ for arbitrary infinite sets first.)







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered Jan 8 at 10:03









                            ComFreekComFreek

                            5321411




                            5321411












                                yC VpY7yyUi7o 5i xyOfaTRS wNpUN
                                abY8Ps45S T4w sogk1YfkqkWbMe,WLpOh eLunzp

                                Popular posts from this blog

                                How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

                                How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?

                                Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS