How to resolve “Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages” error in Debian 9?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












0















I am trying to install software-properties-common on my Debian 9. But i get the error which states




The following packages have unmet dependencies:
software-properties-common : Depends: python3-software-properties (=
0.96.20.2-1) but it is not going to be installed
Recommends: packagekit but it is not going to be installed E: Unable to correct problems, you have held
broken packages.




I have tried many solutions like apt update -f (as suggested by most of the debian users) but nothing worked for me.



Here is my source.list file:



deb http://deb.debian.org/debian stretch main contrib non-free
deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian stretch main contrib non-free

deb http://deb.debian.org/debian-security/ stretch/updates main contrib non-free
deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian-security/ stretch/updates main contrib non$

deb http://deb.debian.org/debian stretch-updates main contrib non-free
deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian stretch-updates main contrib non-free





debian apt







share|improve this question






















  • you can use an iterative approach until the real problem is found. 1st round: apt-get -d install software-properties-common python3-software-properties=0.96.20.2-1 packagekit (you can leave packagekit alone it's only recommended)

    – A.B
    Jan 4 at 21:10











  • @A.B I had already tried this. I get the same error for python3-software-properties

    – Hashir Sarwar
    Jan 4 at 21:16











  • Maybe this happened after you did something special but didn't write in the question? Did you update (with apt update , not apt update -f which is illegal) before trying ?

    – A.B
    Jan 5 at 12:34
















0















I am trying to install software-properties-common on my Debian 9. But i get the error which states




The following packages have unmet dependencies:
software-properties-common : Depends: python3-software-properties (=
0.96.20.2-1) but it is not going to be installed
Recommends: packagekit but it is not going to be installed E: Unable to correct problems, you have held
broken packages.




I have tried many solutions like apt update -f (as suggested by most of the debian users) but nothing worked for me.



Here is my source.list file:



deb http://deb.debian.org/debian stretch main contrib non-free
deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian stretch main contrib non-free

deb http://deb.debian.org/debian-security/ stretch/updates main contrib non-free
deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian-security/ stretch/updates main contrib non$

deb http://deb.debian.org/debian stretch-updates main contrib non-free
deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian stretch-updates main contrib non-free





debian apt







share|improve this question






















  • you can use an iterative approach until the real problem is found. 1st round: apt-get -d install software-properties-common python3-software-properties=0.96.20.2-1 packagekit (you can leave packagekit alone it's only recommended)

    – A.B
    Jan 4 at 21:10











  • @A.B I had already tried this. I get the same error for python3-software-properties

    – Hashir Sarwar
    Jan 4 at 21:16











  • Maybe this happened after you did something special but didn't write in the question? Did you update (with apt update , not apt update -f which is illegal) before trying ?

    – A.B
    Jan 5 at 12:34














0












0








0








I am trying to install software-properties-common on my Debian 9. But i get the error which states




The following packages have unmet dependencies:
software-properties-common : Depends: python3-software-properties (=
0.96.20.2-1) but it is not going to be installed
Recommends: packagekit but it is not going to be installed E: Unable to correct problems, you have held
broken packages.




I have tried many solutions like apt update -f (as suggested by most of the debian users) but nothing worked for me.



Here is my source.list file:



deb http://deb.debian.org/debian stretch main contrib non-free
deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian stretch main contrib non-free

deb http://deb.debian.org/debian-security/ stretch/updates main contrib non-free
deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian-security/ stretch/updates main contrib non$

deb http://deb.debian.org/debian stretch-updates main contrib non-free
deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian stretch-updates main contrib non-free





debian apt







share|improve this question














I am trying to install software-properties-common on my Debian 9. But i get the error which states




The following packages have unmet dependencies:
software-properties-common : Depends: python3-software-properties (=
0.96.20.2-1) but it is not going to be installed
Recommends: packagekit but it is not going to be installed E: Unable to correct problems, you have held
broken packages.




I have tried many solutions like apt update -f (as suggested by most of the debian users) but nothing worked for me.



Here is my source.list file:



deb http://deb.debian.org/debian stretch main contrib non-free
deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian stretch main contrib non-free

deb http://deb.debian.org/debian-security/ stretch/updates main contrib non-free
deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian-security/ stretch/updates main contrib non$

deb http://deb.debian.org/debian stretch-updates main contrib non-free
deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian stretch-updates main contrib non-free





debian apt




debian apt






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Jan 4 at 20:35









Hashir SarwarHashir Sarwar

1




1












  • you can use an iterative approach until the real problem is found. 1st round: apt-get -d install software-properties-common python3-software-properties=0.96.20.2-1 packagekit (you can leave packagekit alone it's only recommended)

    – A.B
    Jan 4 at 21:10











  • @A.B I had already tried this. I get the same error for python3-software-properties

    – Hashir Sarwar
    Jan 4 at 21:16











  • Maybe this happened after you did something special but didn't write in the question? Did you update (with apt update , not apt update -f which is illegal) before trying ?

    – A.B
    Jan 5 at 12:34


















  • you can use an iterative approach until the real problem is found. 1st round: apt-get -d install software-properties-common python3-software-properties=0.96.20.2-1 packagekit (you can leave packagekit alone it's only recommended)

    – A.B
    Jan 4 at 21:10











  • @A.B I had already tried this. I get the same error for python3-software-properties

    – Hashir Sarwar
    Jan 4 at 21:16











  • Maybe this happened after you did something special but didn't write in the question? Did you update (with apt update , not apt update -f which is illegal) before trying ?

    – A.B
    Jan 5 at 12:34

















you can use an iterative approach until the real problem is found. 1st round: apt-get -d install software-properties-common python3-software-properties=0.96.20.2-1 packagekit (you can leave packagekit alone it's only recommended)

– A.B
Jan 4 at 21:10





you can use an iterative approach until the real problem is found. 1st round: apt-get -d install software-properties-common python3-software-properties=0.96.20.2-1 packagekit (you can leave packagekit alone it's only recommended)

– A.B
Jan 4 at 21:10













@A.B I had already tried this. I get the same error for python3-software-properties

– Hashir Sarwar
Jan 4 at 21:16





@A.B I had already tried this. I get the same error for python3-software-properties

– Hashir Sarwar
Jan 4 at 21:16













Maybe this happened after you did something special but didn't write in the question? Did you update (with apt update , not apt update -f which is illegal) before trying ?

– A.B
Jan 5 at 12:34






Maybe this happened after you did something special but didn't write in the question? Did you update (with apt update , not apt update -f which is illegal) before trying ?

– A.B
Jan 5 at 12:34











0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f492580%2fhow-to-resolve-unable-to-correct-problems-you-have-held-broken-packages-error%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f492580%2fhow-to-resolve-unable-to-correct-problems-you-have-held-broken-packages-error%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown






-

Popular posts from this blog

How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

Image
Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this question asked Sep 26 at 0:12 ToanLuong 49 9 add a comment  |  up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this questi...
Read more

Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

Image
Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP 1 How can I extract a single band from multi-band raster in QGIS? I have an remote sensed image which has 6 bands (including NDVI band), I want to display each band separately, but have no idea how to do. I have seen some questions similar here but none worked for me. The original image (has 6 bands) is: I want to display the band 6 which should be like this: But I tried gdal_translate, and couldn't get the correct result. What I have got is: qgis raster multi-band share | improve this question edited Mar 5 at 0:53 Summer asked Mar 4 at 6:42 Summer Summer 23 6 Is this any help gis.stackexchange.com/questions/220658/… ? if not gis.stackexchange.com/questions/62133/… might help. – Michael Stimson Mar 4 at 6:46 Thanks for answering but when I used gdal_translate, qgis showed that 'Error 4: Kayena.tif: No such file or directory". Would you know how to fi...
Read more

How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?

Image
Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 2 down vote favorite I am currently learning reverse engineering and am studying the flags register. I had in my mind that rflags was just another name for one of the 16 general purpose registers, for example rax or rbx . But it looks like rflags is actually an additional register. So that makes 17 registers in total... how many more could there be? I have spent at least an hour on this and found numerous different answers. The best answer so far is this, which says that there are 40 registers in total. 16 General Purpose Registers 2 Status Registers 6 Code Segment Registers 16 SSE Registers 8 FPU/MMX Registers But if I add that up, I get 48. Could anybody provide an official answer on how many registers an x86_64 CPU has (e.g. an Intel i7). Additionally, I have seen references to 'hardware' and 'architectural' registers. What are those registers and how many are there? register x86-64 share | improve this...
Read more