Submitting very quickly a revised version of a paper
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
After a first round of revision, I have a paper whose status on Elsevier is "Accept, after minor Revision". Indeed, referees pointed out some revisions (very minor ones) which are relatively easy to be fulfilled. I made the necessary modifications in one day.
My question, is really a bad signal to resubmit very quickly a paper? What can be pros and cons of that?
publications
asked Dec 15 at 14:57
optimal control
1,69111329
add a comment |
After a first round of revision, I have a paper whose status on Elsevier is "Accept, after minor Revision". Indeed, referees pointed out some revisions (very minor ones) which are relatively easy to be fulfilled. I made the necessary modifications in one day.
My question, is really a bad signal to resubmit very quickly a paper? What can be pros and cons of that?
publications
asked Dec 15 at 14:57
optimal control
1,69111329
What do you mean by "quickly"? In my experience, "resubmit quickly" means months or three
– aaaaaa
Dec 16 at 21:23
It really depends. The multiple choice offered to referees is as such that minor revision might be correcting an arrow or a comma or otherwise easy but still time and care requiring changes. You are the only one who knows that.
– Alchimista
Dec 17 at 10:53
add a comment |
After a first round of revision, I have a paper whose status on Elsevier is "Accept, after minor Revision". Indeed, referees pointed out some revisions (very minor ones) which are relatively easy to be fulfilled. I made the necessary modifications in one day.
My question, is really a bad signal to resubmit very quickly a paper? What can be pros and cons of that?
publications
asked Dec 15 at 14:57
optimal control
1,69111329
After a first round of revision, I have a paper whose status on Elsevier is "Accept, after minor Revision". Indeed, referees pointed out some revisions (very minor ones) which are relatively easy to be fulfilled. I made the necessary modifications in one day.
My question, is really a bad signal to resubmit very quickly a paper? What can be pros and cons of that?
publications
publications
asked Dec 15 at 14:57
optimal control
1,69111329
asked Dec 15 at 14:57
optimal control
1,69111329
asked Dec 15 at 14:57
optimal control
1,69111329
asked Dec 15 at 14:57
optimal control
1,69111329
asked Dec 15 at 14:57
optimal control
1,69111329
1,69111329
What do you mean by "quickly"? In my experience, "resubmit quickly" means months or three
– aaaaaa
Dec 16 at 21:23
It really depends. The multiple choice offered to referees is as such that minor revision might be correcting an arrow or a comma or otherwise easy but still time and care requiring changes. You are the only one who knows that.
– Alchimista
Dec 17 at 10:53
add a comment |
What do you mean by "quickly"? In my experience, "resubmit quickly" means months or three
– aaaaaa
Dec 16 at 21:23
It really depends. The multiple choice offered to referees is as such that minor revision might be correcting an arrow or a comma or otherwise easy but still time and care requiring changes. You are the only one who knows that.
– Alchimista
Dec 17 at 10:53
What do you mean by "quickly"? In my experience, "resubmit quickly" means months or three
– aaaaaa
Dec 16 at 21:23
What do you mean by "quickly"? In my experience, "resubmit quickly" means months or three
– aaaaaa
Dec 16 at 21:23
It really depends. The multiple choice offered to referees is as such that minor revision might be correcting an arrow or a comma or otherwise easy but still time and care requiring changes. You are the only one who knows that.
– Alchimista
Dec 17 at 10:53
It really depends. The multiple choice offered to referees is as such that minor revision might be correcting an arrow or a comma or otherwise easy but still time and care requiring changes. You are the only one who knows that.
– Alchimista
Dec 17 at 10:53
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
As long as you don't exceed the deadline, I don't think it really matters - it won't get "more accepted" for being resubmitted quickly. Of course, sometimes it can help getting it into production faster.
However, if you have spare time I'd suggest not rushing the resubmission. While you could get away with taking a day, consider taking closer to a week. Forget about the paper for a couple of days, and carefully proofread it again - both the revisions, and the unchanged parts.
answered Dec 15 at 15:19
Anyon
6,34122338
2
"As long as you don't exceed the deadline," Usually you can exceed the deadline.
– Anonymous Physicist
Dec 15 at 19:13
2
@AnonymousPhysicist True, but given how minor the revisions appear to be in this case, it seems unnecessary to even consider waiting that long to resubmit, and unnecessarily testing the editor's patience.
– Anyon
Dec 15 at 21:53
add a comment |
Don't overthink it, nobody is going to notice, and if someone notices, they won't care.
The paper is the only thing that matters, if all the reviewers' remarks were addressed (either by changing stuff or by providing a reasonable argument not to change), then it's done, better sooner than later.
answered Dec 15 at 15:15
Fábio Dias
7,42812350
2
+1. It may even be an advantage as it gets the paper into the production system sooner.
– Buffy
Dec 15 at 15:19
add a comment |
If it's not unreasonable that the edits could be made in a day, there's no reason to hide the fact that you addressed everything in only a day.
answered Dec 15 at 20:00
Joshua
1,502614
add a comment |
A one day turnaround is not unreasonable for minor revisions. Think about how documents are processed in the work world.
Also, note that minor revisions may even mean the paper does not go back to the reviewers but the editor just looks at it and signs off on it. He sees that you have made the changes. Also, good if your cover letter is clear for him. "I have implemented all changes except number 5 of reviewer 2, which is no longer relevant based on other changes". Or whatever the story is.
answered Dec 20 at 2:44
guest
311
New contributor
guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "415"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f121677%2fsubmitting-very-quickly-a-revised-version-of-a-paper%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
As long as you don't exceed the deadline, I don't think it really matters - it won't get "more accepted" for being resubmitted quickly. Of course, sometimes it can help getting it into production faster.
However, if you have spare time I'd suggest not rushing the resubmission. While you could get away with taking a day, consider taking closer to a week. Forget about the paper for a couple of days, and carefully proofread it again - both the revisions, and the unchanged parts.
answered Dec 15 at 15:19
Anyon
6,34122338
2
"As long as you don't exceed the deadline," Usually you can exceed the deadline.
– Anonymous Physicist
Dec 15 at 19:13
2
@AnonymousPhysicist True, but given how minor the revisions appear to be in this case, it seems unnecessary to even consider waiting that long to resubmit, and unnecessarily testing the editor's patience.
– Anyon
Dec 15 at 21:53
add a comment |
As long as you don't exceed the deadline, I don't think it really matters - it won't get "more accepted" for being resubmitted quickly. Of course, sometimes it can help getting it into production faster.
However, if you have spare time I'd suggest not rushing the resubmission. While you could get away with taking a day, consider taking closer to a week. Forget about the paper for a couple of days, and carefully proofread it again - both the revisions, and the unchanged parts.
answered Dec 15 at 15:19
Anyon
6,34122338
2
"As long as you don't exceed the deadline," Usually you can exceed the deadline.
– Anonymous Physicist
Dec 15 at 19:13
2
@AnonymousPhysicist True, but given how minor the revisions appear to be in this case, it seems unnecessary to even consider waiting that long to resubmit, and unnecessarily testing the editor's patience.
– Anyon
Dec 15 at 21:53
add a comment |
As long as you don't exceed the deadline, I don't think it really matters - it won't get "more accepted" for being resubmitted quickly. Of course, sometimes it can help getting it into production faster.
However, if you have spare time I'd suggest not rushing the resubmission. While you could get away with taking a day, consider taking closer to a week. Forget about the paper for a couple of days, and carefully proofread it again - both the revisions, and the unchanged parts.
answered Dec 15 at 15:19
Anyon
6,34122338
As long as you don't exceed the deadline, I don't think it really matters - it won't get "more accepted" for being resubmitted quickly. Of course, sometimes it can help getting it into production faster.
However, if you have spare time I'd suggest not rushing the resubmission. While you could get away with taking a day, consider taking closer to a week. Forget about the paper for a couple of days, and carefully proofread it again - both the revisions, and the unchanged parts.
answered Dec 15 at 15:19
Anyon
6,34122338
answered Dec 15 at 15:19
Anyon
6,34122338
answered Dec 15 at 15:19
Anyon
6,34122338
answered Dec 15 at 15:19
Anyon
6,34122338
6,34122338
2
"As long as you don't exceed the deadline," Usually you can exceed the deadline.
– Anonymous Physicist
Dec 15 at 19:13
2
@AnonymousPhysicist True, but given how minor the revisions appear to be in this case, it seems unnecessary to even consider waiting that long to resubmit, and unnecessarily testing the editor's patience.
– Anyon
Dec 15 at 21:53
add a comment |
2
"As long as you don't exceed the deadline," Usually you can exceed the deadline.
– Anonymous Physicist
Dec 15 at 19:13
2
@AnonymousPhysicist True, but given how minor the revisions appear to be in this case, it seems unnecessary to even consider waiting that long to resubmit, and unnecessarily testing the editor's patience.
– Anyon
Dec 15 at 21:53
2
2
"As long as you don't exceed the deadline," Usually you can exceed the deadline.
– Anonymous Physicist
Dec 15 at 19:13
"As long as you don't exceed the deadline," Usually you can exceed the deadline.
– Anonymous Physicist
Dec 15 at 19:13
2
2
@AnonymousPhysicist True, but given how minor the revisions appear to be in this case, it seems unnecessary to even consider waiting that long to resubmit, and unnecessarily testing the editor's patience.
– Anyon
Dec 15 at 21:53
@AnonymousPhysicist True, but given how minor the revisions appear to be in this case, it seems unnecessary to even consider waiting that long to resubmit, and unnecessarily testing the editor's patience.
– Anyon
Dec 15 at 21:53
add a comment |
Don't overthink it, nobody is going to notice, and if someone notices, they won't care.
The paper is the only thing that matters, if all the reviewers' remarks were addressed (either by changing stuff or by providing a reasonable argument not to change), then it's done, better sooner than later.
answered Dec 15 at 15:15
Fábio Dias
7,42812350
2
+1. It may even be an advantage as it gets the paper into the production system sooner.
– Buffy
Dec 15 at 15:19
add a comment |
Don't overthink it, nobody is going to notice, and if someone notices, they won't care.
The paper is the only thing that matters, if all the reviewers' remarks were addressed (either by changing stuff or by providing a reasonable argument not to change), then it's done, better sooner than later.
answered Dec 15 at 15:15
Fábio Dias
7,42812350
2
+1. It may even be an advantage as it gets the paper into the production system sooner.
– Buffy
Dec 15 at 15:19
add a comment |
Don't overthink it, nobody is going to notice, and if someone notices, they won't care.
The paper is the only thing that matters, if all the reviewers' remarks were addressed (either by changing stuff or by providing a reasonable argument not to change), then it's done, better sooner than later.
answered Dec 15 at 15:15
Fábio Dias
7,42812350
Don't overthink it, nobody is going to notice, and if someone notices, they won't care.
The paper is the only thing that matters, if all the reviewers' remarks were addressed (either by changing stuff or by providing a reasonable argument not to change), then it's done, better sooner than later.
answered Dec 15 at 15:15
Fábio Dias
7,42812350
answered Dec 15 at 15:15
Fábio Dias
7,42812350
answered Dec 15 at 15:15
Fábio Dias
7,42812350
answered Dec 15 at 15:15
Fábio Dias
7,42812350
7,42812350
2
+1. It may even be an advantage as it gets the paper into the production system sooner.
– Buffy
Dec 15 at 15:19
add a comment |
2
+1. It may even be an advantage as it gets the paper into the production system sooner.
– Buffy
Dec 15 at 15:19
2
2
+1. It may even be an advantage as it gets the paper into the production system sooner.
– Buffy
Dec 15 at 15:19
+1. It may even be an advantage as it gets the paper into the production system sooner.
– Buffy
Dec 15 at 15:19
add a comment |
If it's not unreasonable that the edits could be made in a day, there's no reason to hide the fact that you addressed everything in only a day.
answered Dec 15 at 20:00
Joshua
1,502614
add a comment |
If it's not unreasonable that the edits could be made in a day, there's no reason to hide the fact that you addressed everything in only a day.
answered Dec 15 at 20:00
Joshua
1,502614
add a comment |
If it's not unreasonable that the edits could be made in a day, there's no reason to hide the fact that you addressed everything in only a day.
answered Dec 15 at 20:00
Joshua
1,502614
If it's not unreasonable that the edits could be made in a day, there's no reason to hide the fact that you addressed everything in only a day.
answered Dec 15 at 20:00
Joshua
1,502614
edited Dec 20 at 0:42
answered Dec 15 at 20:00
Joshua
1,502614
answered Dec 15 at 20:00
Joshua
1,502614
answered Dec 15 at 20:00
Joshua
1,502614
1,502614
add a comment |
add a comment |
A one day turnaround is not unreasonable for minor revisions. Think about how documents are processed in the work world.
Also, note that minor revisions may even mean the paper does not go back to the reviewers but the editor just looks at it and signs off on it. He sees that you have made the changes. Also, good if your cover letter is clear for him. "I have implemented all changes except number 5 of reviewer 2, which is no longer relevant based on other changes". Or whatever the story is.
answered Dec 20 at 2:44
guest
311
New contributor
guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
A one day turnaround is not unreasonable for minor revisions. Think about how documents are processed in the work world.
Also, note that minor revisions may even mean the paper does not go back to the reviewers but the editor just looks at it and signs off on it. He sees that you have made the changes. Also, good if your cover letter is clear for him. "I have implemented all changes except number 5 of reviewer 2, which is no longer relevant based on other changes". Or whatever the story is.
answered Dec 20 at 2:44
guest
311
New contributor
guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
A one day turnaround is not unreasonable for minor revisions. Think about how documents are processed in the work world.
Also, note that minor revisions may even mean the paper does not go back to the reviewers but the editor just looks at it and signs off on it. He sees that you have made the changes. Also, good if your cover letter is clear for him. "I have implemented all changes except number 5 of reviewer 2, which is no longer relevant based on other changes". Or whatever the story is.
answered Dec 20 at 2:44
guest
311
New contributor
guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
A one day turnaround is not unreasonable for minor revisions. Think about how documents are processed in the work world.
Also, note that minor revisions may even mean the paper does not go back to the reviewers but the editor just looks at it and signs off on it. He sees that you have made the changes. Also, good if your cover letter is clear for him. "I have implemented all changes except number 5 of reviewer 2, which is no longer relevant based on other changes". Or whatever the story is.
answered Dec 20 at 2:44
guest
311
New contributor
guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered Dec 20 at 2:44
guest
311
New contributor
guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered Dec 20 at 2:44
guest
311
answered Dec 20 at 2:44
guest
311
311
New contributor
guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Academia Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f121677%2fsubmitting-very-quickly-a-revised-version-of-a-paper%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
What do you mean by "quickly"? In my experience, "resubmit quickly" means months or three
– aaaaaa
Dec 16 at 21:23
It really depends. The multiple choice offered to referees is as such that minor revision might be correcting an arrow or a comma or otherwise easy but still time and care requiring changes. You are the only one who knows that.
– Alchimista
Dec 17 at 10:53