Code hook after variable setting actions in l3keys

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












7














I am trying out l3keys for the first time and I am encountering the following issue. I have some boolean keys (true/false). For them it looks nice to use .bool_set:N so that I can get automatic validation of the value passed into the key and I also get the key value nicely stored in a boolean variable for later inspection.



At the same time, I would like to execute some code right after the variable is set. However, it looks like .code:n and bool_set:N cannot be used together on the same key, because the one that comes later substitutes the action of the first. In practice, there seems to be no possibility to run a hook triggered by the variable setting action.



Obviously, there are several possible workarounds:



  • run some code after every key_set:nn.

    However, this means that such code needs to check for every possible variable being set to see if it has changed and take action accordingly. If you have say 30 variables, this means checking all of them, when maybe only one of them is being changed. Having a hook invoked just for the variable that has been set seems more appropriate as long as the variables do not interact one with the other.


  • use .code:n instead of the variable setting actions.

    However, this means redoing the parsing and validation of the value.


Because all the workarounds seem to have inefficiencies of their own, I wonder if I am missing something... Any help is appreciated!










share|improve this question


























    7














    I am trying out l3keys for the first time and I am encountering the following issue. I have some boolean keys (true/false). For them it looks nice to use .bool_set:N so that I can get automatic validation of the value passed into the key and I also get the key value nicely stored in a boolean variable for later inspection.



    At the same time, I would like to execute some code right after the variable is set. However, it looks like .code:n and bool_set:N cannot be used together on the same key, because the one that comes later substitutes the action of the first. In practice, there seems to be no possibility to run a hook triggered by the variable setting action.



    Obviously, there are several possible workarounds:



    • run some code after every key_set:nn.

      However, this means that such code needs to check for every possible variable being set to see if it has changed and take action accordingly. If you have say 30 variables, this means checking all of them, when maybe only one of them is being changed. Having a hook invoked just for the variable that has been set seems more appropriate as long as the variables do not interact one with the other.


    • use .code:n instead of the variable setting actions.

      However, this means redoing the parsing and validation of the value.


    Because all the workarounds seem to have inefficiencies of their own, I wonder if I am missing something... Any help is appreciated!










    share|improve this question
























      7












      7








      7







      I am trying out l3keys for the first time and I am encountering the following issue. I have some boolean keys (true/false). For them it looks nice to use .bool_set:N so that I can get automatic validation of the value passed into the key and I also get the key value nicely stored in a boolean variable for later inspection.



      At the same time, I would like to execute some code right after the variable is set. However, it looks like .code:n and bool_set:N cannot be used together on the same key, because the one that comes later substitutes the action of the first. In practice, there seems to be no possibility to run a hook triggered by the variable setting action.



      Obviously, there are several possible workarounds:



      • run some code after every key_set:nn.

        However, this means that such code needs to check for every possible variable being set to see if it has changed and take action accordingly. If you have say 30 variables, this means checking all of them, when maybe only one of them is being changed. Having a hook invoked just for the variable that has been set seems more appropriate as long as the variables do not interact one with the other.


      • use .code:n instead of the variable setting actions.

        However, this means redoing the parsing and validation of the value.


      Because all the workarounds seem to have inefficiencies of their own, I wonder if I am missing something... Any help is appreciated!










      share|improve this question













      I am trying out l3keys for the first time and I am encountering the following issue. I have some boolean keys (true/false). For them it looks nice to use .bool_set:N so that I can get automatic validation of the value passed into the key and I also get the key value nicely stored in a boolean variable for later inspection.



      At the same time, I would like to execute some code right after the variable is set. However, it looks like .code:n and bool_set:N cannot be used together on the same key, because the one that comes later substitutes the action of the first. In practice, there seems to be no possibility to run a hook triggered by the variable setting action.



      Obviously, there are several possible workarounds:



      • run some code after every key_set:nn.

        However, this means that such code needs to check for every possible variable being set to see if it has changed and take action accordingly. If you have say 30 variables, this means checking all of them, when maybe only one of them is being changed. Having a hook invoked just for the variable that has been set seems more appropriate as long as the variables do not interact one with the other.


      • use .code:n instead of the variable setting actions.

        However, this means redoing the parsing and validation of the value.


      Because all the workarounds seem to have inefficiencies of their own, I wonder if I am missing something... Any help is appreciated!







      l3keys






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Dec 15 at 16:27









      Callegar

      961




      961




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4














          This is not a real solution, more like a viable workaround:



          You could create a .meta:n key, that is the documented front-facing key, and two additional keys, one for the .bool_set:N, and one for the .code:n:



          documentclassarticle

          usepackagexparse
          ExplSyntaxOn
          keys_define:nn Callegar

          my-bool .meta:n = my-bool-bool = #1 , my-bool-code = #1 ,
          my-bool-bool .bool_set:N = l_Callegar_bool,
          my-bool-code .code:n =
          Execute~Some~Code~for~bool_if:NTF l_Callegar_bool true false

          NewDocumentCommand setmykeys m

          keys_set:nn Callegar #1

          ExplSyntaxOff

          begindocument
          setmykeysmy-bool=true
          enddocument





          share|improve this answer




























            2














            The following redefines an internal function of the l3keys module and might therefore break stuff in the future. Use with caution.



            After digging a bit through the l3keys code, I thought one could add a hook to the keys. The following does so by adding a hook mechanism to __keys_cmd_set:nn. After that one can define a hook with:



            keys_define:nn <module> <key> .hook:n = <hook code> 


            I didn't test it thoroughly, but as far as a quick view l3keys could tell, the hook mechanism should work with any key type. Note that it doesn't create any key on its own, so you have to use it on an already defined key.



            documentclassarticle

            usepackagexparse
            ExplSyntaxOn
            % redefine a part of the internals of l3keys
            cs_set_protected:Npn __keys_cmd_set:nn #1#2

            cs_set_protected:cpn c__keys_code_root_tl #1 ##1
            #2 use:c c__keys_code_root_tl #1 _hook

            % add the .hook:n type
            cs_new_protected:cpn c__keys_props_root_tl .hook:n #1

            tl_gset:cn c__keys_code_root_tl l_keys_path_tl _hook #1


            keys_define:nn Callegar

            my-fool .bool_set:N = l_Callegar_bool,
            my-fool .hook:n = Execute~Some~Code~Regardless ,
            my-fool / true .hook:n =
            Execute~Some~Hook~Code~for~true ,
            my-fool / false .hook:n =
            Execute~Some~Hook~Code~for~false ,

            NewDocumentCommand setmykeys m

            keys_set:nn Callegar #1

            ExplSyntaxOff

            begindocument
            setmykeysmy-fool=true

            setmykeysmy-fool=false
            enddocument


            enter image description here



            A slightly different implementation that also allows .hook:n to access the value:



            cs_set_protected:Npn __keys_cmd_set:nn #1#2

            cs_set_protected:cpn c__keys_code_root_tl #1 ##1

            #2
            cs_if_exist_use:cT c__keys_code_root_tl #1 _hook ##1


            % add the .hook:n type
            cs_new_protected:cpn c__keys_props_root_tl .hook:n #1

            cs_set:cpn c__keys_code_root_tl l_keys_path_tl _hook ##1 #1


            keys_define:nn Callegar

            my-fool .bool_set:N = l_Callegar_bool,
            my-fool .hook:n = Execute~Some~Code~Regardless~'#1' ,
            my-fool / true .hook:n =
            Execute~Some~Hook~Code~for~true ,
            my-fool / false .hook:n =
            Execute~Some~Hook~Code~for~false ,






            share|improve this answer






















            • Thanks Skillmon, that's interesting although by being a new on l3keys its hard for me to read its code to understand how you are touching its internals. If I get it correctly, __keys_cmd_set:nn is the internal used to associate code to the keys, 1st argument is the key path and 2nd one is the code itself, is this the OK? So you are imposing that after the regular code the hook code is used, is this correct? What puzzles me a bit is the role of all those constants. Furthermore, the variant is a little obscure to me in how it passes ##1 to the hook. Could you help me understand?
              – Callegar
              Dec 18 at 16:39










            • @Callegar yes, __keys_cmd_set:nn is the internal to actually define a key and most/all key types are using it internally. All those constants are internals of l3keys, too, which are supposed to assure no naming conflicts.The variant checks whether the hook has been defined (cs_if_exist_use:cT), and if it does it inputs the control sequence and the next argument, stripping one pair of braces. So if foo_hook exists, cs_if_exist_use:cT foo_hook ##1 expands to foo_hook ##1 , and foo_hook can absorb that argument.
              – Skillmon
              Dec 18 at 17:48










            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "85"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f465998%2fcode-hook-after-variable-setting-actions-in-l3keys%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            4














            This is not a real solution, more like a viable workaround:



            You could create a .meta:n key, that is the documented front-facing key, and two additional keys, one for the .bool_set:N, and one for the .code:n:



            documentclassarticle

            usepackagexparse
            ExplSyntaxOn
            keys_define:nn Callegar

            my-bool .meta:n = my-bool-bool = #1 , my-bool-code = #1 ,
            my-bool-bool .bool_set:N = l_Callegar_bool,
            my-bool-code .code:n =
            Execute~Some~Code~for~bool_if:NTF l_Callegar_bool true false

            NewDocumentCommand setmykeys m

            keys_set:nn Callegar #1

            ExplSyntaxOff

            begindocument
            setmykeysmy-bool=true
            enddocument





            share|improve this answer

























              4














              This is not a real solution, more like a viable workaround:



              You could create a .meta:n key, that is the documented front-facing key, and two additional keys, one for the .bool_set:N, and one for the .code:n:



              documentclassarticle

              usepackagexparse
              ExplSyntaxOn
              keys_define:nn Callegar

              my-bool .meta:n = my-bool-bool = #1 , my-bool-code = #1 ,
              my-bool-bool .bool_set:N = l_Callegar_bool,
              my-bool-code .code:n =
              Execute~Some~Code~for~bool_if:NTF l_Callegar_bool true false

              NewDocumentCommand setmykeys m

              keys_set:nn Callegar #1

              ExplSyntaxOff

              begindocument
              setmykeysmy-bool=true
              enddocument





              share|improve this answer























                4












                4








                4






                This is not a real solution, more like a viable workaround:



                You could create a .meta:n key, that is the documented front-facing key, and two additional keys, one for the .bool_set:N, and one for the .code:n:



                documentclassarticle

                usepackagexparse
                ExplSyntaxOn
                keys_define:nn Callegar

                my-bool .meta:n = my-bool-bool = #1 , my-bool-code = #1 ,
                my-bool-bool .bool_set:N = l_Callegar_bool,
                my-bool-code .code:n =
                Execute~Some~Code~for~bool_if:NTF l_Callegar_bool true false

                NewDocumentCommand setmykeys m

                keys_set:nn Callegar #1

                ExplSyntaxOff

                begindocument
                setmykeysmy-bool=true
                enddocument





                share|improve this answer












                This is not a real solution, more like a viable workaround:



                You could create a .meta:n key, that is the documented front-facing key, and two additional keys, one for the .bool_set:N, and one for the .code:n:



                documentclassarticle

                usepackagexparse
                ExplSyntaxOn
                keys_define:nn Callegar

                my-bool .meta:n = my-bool-bool = #1 , my-bool-code = #1 ,
                my-bool-bool .bool_set:N = l_Callegar_bool,
                my-bool-code .code:n =
                Execute~Some~Code~for~bool_if:NTF l_Callegar_bool true false

                NewDocumentCommand setmykeys m

                keys_set:nn Callegar #1

                ExplSyntaxOff

                begindocument
                setmykeysmy-bool=true
                enddocument






                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Dec 15 at 18:36









                Skillmon

                21k11941




                21k11941





















                    2














                    The following redefines an internal function of the l3keys module and might therefore break stuff in the future. Use with caution.



                    After digging a bit through the l3keys code, I thought one could add a hook to the keys. The following does so by adding a hook mechanism to __keys_cmd_set:nn. After that one can define a hook with:



                    keys_define:nn <module> <key> .hook:n = <hook code> 


                    I didn't test it thoroughly, but as far as a quick view l3keys could tell, the hook mechanism should work with any key type. Note that it doesn't create any key on its own, so you have to use it on an already defined key.



                    documentclassarticle

                    usepackagexparse
                    ExplSyntaxOn
                    % redefine a part of the internals of l3keys
                    cs_set_protected:Npn __keys_cmd_set:nn #1#2

                    cs_set_protected:cpn c__keys_code_root_tl #1 ##1
                    #2 use:c c__keys_code_root_tl #1 _hook

                    % add the .hook:n type
                    cs_new_protected:cpn c__keys_props_root_tl .hook:n #1

                    tl_gset:cn c__keys_code_root_tl l_keys_path_tl _hook #1


                    keys_define:nn Callegar

                    my-fool .bool_set:N = l_Callegar_bool,
                    my-fool .hook:n = Execute~Some~Code~Regardless ,
                    my-fool / true .hook:n =
                    Execute~Some~Hook~Code~for~true ,
                    my-fool / false .hook:n =
                    Execute~Some~Hook~Code~for~false ,

                    NewDocumentCommand setmykeys m

                    keys_set:nn Callegar #1

                    ExplSyntaxOff

                    begindocument
                    setmykeysmy-fool=true

                    setmykeysmy-fool=false
                    enddocument


                    enter image description here



                    A slightly different implementation that also allows .hook:n to access the value:



                    cs_set_protected:Npn __keys_cmd_set:nn #1#2

                    cs_set_protected:cpn c__keys_code_root_tl #1 ##1

                    #2
                    cs_if_exist_use:cT c__keys_code_root_tl #1 _hook ##1


                    % add the .hook:n type
                    cs_new_protected:cpn c__keys_props_root_tl .hook:n #1

                    cs_set:cpn c__keys_code_root_tl l_keys_path_tl _hook ##1 #1


                    keys_define:nn Callegar

                    my-fool .bool_set:N = l_Callegar_bool,
                    my-fool .hook:n = Execute~Some~Code~Regardless~'#1' ,
                    my-fool / true .hook:n =
                    Execute~Some~Hook~Code~for~true ,
                    my-fool / false .hook:n =
                    Execute~Some~Hook~Code~for~false ,






                    share|improve this answer






















                    • Thanks Skillmon, that's interesting although by being a new on l3keys its hard for me to read its code to understand how you are touching its internals. If I get it correctly, __keys_cmd_set:nn is the internal used to associate code to the keys, 1st argument is the key path and 2nd one is the code itself, is this the OK? So you are imposing that after the regular code the hook code is used, is this correct? What puzzles me a bit is the role of all those constants. Furthermore, the variant is a little obscure to me in how it passes ##1 to the hook. Could you help me understand?
                      – Callegar
                      Dec 18 at 16:39










                    • @Callegar yes, __keys_cmd_set:nn is the internal to actually define a key and most/all key types are using it internally. All those constants are internals of l3keys, too, which are supposed to assure no naming conflicts.The variant checks whether the hook has been defined (cs_if_exist_use:cT), and if it does it inputs the control sequence and the next argument, stripping one pair of braces. So if foo_hook exists, cs_if_exist_use:cT foo_hook ##1 expands to foo_hook ##1 , and foo_hook can absorb that argument.
                      – Skillmon
                      Dec 18 at 17:48















                    2














                    The following redefines an internal function of the l3keys module and might therefore break stuff in the future. Use with caution.



                    After digging a bit through the l3keys code, I thought one could add a hook to the keys. The following does so by adding a hook mechanism to __keys_cmd_set:nn. After that one can define a hook with:



                    keys_define:nn <module> <key> .hook:n = <hook code> 


                    I didn't test it thoroughly, but as far as a quick view l3keys could tell, the hook mechanism should work with any key type. Note that it doesn't create any key on its own, so you have to use it on an already defined key.



                    documentclassarticle

                    usepackagexparse
                    ExplSyntaxOn
                    % redefine a part of the internals of l3keys
                    cs_set_protected:Npn __keys_cmd_set:nn #1#2

                    cs_set_protected:cpn c__keys_code_root_tl #1 ##1
                    #2 use:c c__keys_code_root_tl #1 _hook

                    % add the .hook:n type
                    cs_new_protected:cpn c__keys_props_root_tl .hook:n #1

                    tl_gset:cn c__keys_code_root_tl l_keys_path_tl _hook #1


                    keys_define:nn Callegar

                    my-fool .bool_set:N = l_Callegar_bool,
                    my-fool .hook:n = Execute~Some~Code~Regardless ,
                    my-fool / true .hook:n =
                    Execute~Some~Hook~Code~for~true ,
                    my-fool / false .hook:n =
                    Execute~Some~Hook~Code~for~false ,

                    NewDocumentCommand setmykeys m

                    keys_set:nn Callegar #1

                    ExplSyntaxOff

                    begindocument
                    setmykeysmy-fool=true

                    setmykeysmy-fool=false
                    enddocument


                    enter image description here



                    A slightly different implementation that also allows .hook:n to access the value:



                    cs_set_protected:Npn __keys_cmd_set:nn #1#2

                    cs_set_protected:cpn c__keys_code_root_tl #1 ##1

                    #2
                    cs_if_exist_use:cT c__keys_code_root_tl #1 _hook ##1


                    % add the .hook:n type
                    cs_new_protected:cpn c__keys_props_root_tl .hook:n #1

                    cs_set:cpn c__keys_code_root_tl l_keys_path_tl _hook ##1 #1


                    keys_define:nn Callegar

                    my-fool .bool_set:N = l_Callegar_bool,
                    my-fool .hook:n = Execute~Some~Code~Regardless~'#1' ,
                    my-fool / true .hook:n =
                    Execute~Some~Hook~Code~for~true ,
                    my-fool / false .hook:n =
                    Execute~Some~Hook~Code~for~false ,






                    share|improve this answer






















                    • Thanks Skillmon, that's interesting although by being a new on l3keys its hard for me to read its code to understand how you are touching its internals. If I get it correctly, __keys_cmd_set:nn is the internal used to associate code to the keys, 1st argument is the key path and 2nd one is the code itself, is this the OK? So you are imposing that after the regular code the hook code is used, is this correct? What puzzles me a bit is the role of all those constants. Furthermore, the variant is a little obscure to me in how it passes ##1 to the hook. Could you help me understand?
                      – Callegar
                      Dec 18 at 16:39










                    • @Callegar yes, __keys_cmd_set:nn is the internal to actually define a key and most/all key types are using it internally. All those constants are internals of l3keys, too, which are supposed to assure no naming conflicts.The variant checks whether the hook has been defined (cs_if_exist_use:cT), and if it does it inputs the control sequence and the next argument, stripping one pair of braces. So if foo_hook exists, cs_if_exist_use:cT foo_hook ##1 expands to foo_hook ##1 , and foo_hook can absorb that argument.
                      – Skillmon
                      Dec 18 at 17:48













                    2












                    2








                    2






                    The following redefines an internal function of the l3keys module and might therefore break stuff in the future. Use with caution.



                    After digging a bit through the l3keys code, I thought one could add a hook to the keys. The following does so by adding a hook mechanism to __keys_cmd_set:nn. After that one can define a hook with:



                    keys_define:nn <module> <key> .hook:n = <hook code> 


                    I didn't test it thoroughly, but as far as a quick view l3keys could tell, the hook mechanism should work with any key type. Note that it doesn't create any key on its own, so you have to use it on an already defined key.



                    documentclassarticle

                    usepackagexparse
                    ExplSyntaxOn
                    % redefine a part of the internals of l3keys
                    cs_set_protected:Npn __keys_cmd_set:nn #1#2

                    cs_set_protected:cpn c__keys_code_root_tl #1 ##1
                    #2 use:c c__keys_code_root_tl #1 _hook

                    % add the .hook:n type
                    cs_new_protected:cpn c__keys_props_root_tl .hook:n #1

                    tl_gset:cn c__keys_code_root_tl l_keys_path_tl _hook #1


                    keys_define:nn Callegar

                    my-fool .bool_set:N = l_Callegar_bool,
                    my-fool .hook:n = Execute~Some~Code~Regardless ,
                    my-fool / true .hook:n =
                    Execute~Some~Hook~Code~for~true ,
                    my-fool / false .hook:n =
                    Execute~Some~Hook~Code~for~false ,

                    NewDocumentCommand setmykeys m

                    keys_set:nn Callegar #1

                    ExplSyntaxOff

                    begindocument
                    setmykeysmy-fool=true

                    setmykeysmy-fool=false
                    enddocument


                    enter image description here



                    A slightly different implementation that also allows .hook:n to access the value:



                    cs_set_protected:Npn __keys_cmd_set:nn #1#2

                    cs_set_protected:cpn c__keys_code_root_tl #1 ##1

                    #2
                    cs_if_exist_use:cT c__keys_code_root_tl #1 _hook ##1


                    % add the .hook:n type
                    cs_new_protected:cpn c__keys_props_root_tl .hook:n #1

                    cs_set:cpn c__keys_code_root_tl l_keys_path_tl _hook ##1 #1


                    keys_define:nn Callegar

                    my-fool .bool_set:N = l_Callegar_bool,
                    my-fool .hook:n = Execute~Some~Code~Regardless~'#1' ,
                    my-fool / true .hook:n =
                    Execute~Some~Hook~Code~for~true ,
                    my-fool / false .hook:n =
                    Execute~Some~Hook~Code~for~false ,






                    share|improve this answer














                    The following redefines an internal function of the l3keys module and might therefore break stuff in the future. Use with caution.



                    After digging a bit through the l3keys code, I thought one could add a hook to the keys. The following does so by adding a hook mechanism to __keys_cmd_set:nn. After that one can define a hook with:



                    keys_define:nn <module> <key> .hook:n = <hook code> 


                    I didn't test it thoroughly, but as far as a quick view l3keys could tell, the hook mechanism should work with any key type. Note that it doesn't create any key on its own, so you have to use it on an already defined key.



                    documentclassarticle

                    usepackagexparse
                    ExplSyntaxOn
                    % redefine a part of the internals of l3keys
                    cs_set_protected:Npn __keys_cmd_set:nn #1#2

                    cs_set_protected:cpn c__keys_code_root_tl #1 ##1
                    #2 use:c c__keys_code_root_tl #1 _hook

                    % add the .hook:n type
                    cs_new_protected:cpn c__keys_props_root_tl .hook:n #1

                    tl_gset:cn c__keys_code_root_tl l_keys_path_tl _hook #1


                    keys_define:nn Callegar

                    my-fool .bool_set:N = l_Callegar_bool,
                    my-fool .hook:n = Execute~Some~Code~Regardless ,
                    my-fool / true .hook:n =
                    Execute~Some~Hook~Code~for~true ,
                    my-fool / false .hook:n =
                    Execute~Some~Hook~Code~for~false ,

                    NewDocumentCommand setmykeys m

                    keys_set:nn Callegar #1

                    ExplSyntaxOff

                    begindocument
                    setmykeysmy-fool=true

                    setmykeysmy-fool=false
                    enddocument


                    enter image description here



                    A slightly different implementation that also allows .hook:n to access the value:



                    cs_set_protected:Npn __keys_cmd_set:nn #1#2

                    cs_set_protected:cpn c__keys_code_root_tl #1 ##1

                    #2
                    cs_if_exist_use:cT c__keys_code_root_tl #1 _hook ##1


                    % add the .hook:n type
                    cs_new_protected:cpn c__keys_props_root_tl .hook:n #1

                    cs_set:cpn c__keys_code_root_tl l_keys_path_tl _hook ##1 #1


                    keys_define:nn Callegar

                    my-fool .bool_set:N = l_Callegar_bool,
                    my-fool .hook:n = Execute~Some~Code~Regardless~'#1' ,
                    my-fool / true .hook:n =
                    Execute~Some~Hook~Code~for~true ,
                    my-fool / false .hook:n =
                    Execute~Some~Hook~Code~for~false ,







                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited Dec 15 at 21:36

























                    answered Dec 15 at 20:12









                    Skillmon

                    21k11941




                    21k11941











                    • Thanks Skillmon, that's interesting although by being a new on l3keys its hard for me to read its code to understand how you are touching its internals. If I get it correctly, __keys_cmd_set:nn is the internal used to associate code to the keys, 1st argument is the key path and 2nd one is the code itself, is this the OK? So you are imposing that after the regular code the hook code is used, is this correct? What puzzles me a bit is the role of all those constants. Furthermore, the variant is a little obscure to me in how it passes ##1 to the hook. Could you help me understand?
                      – Callegar
                      Dec 18 at 16:39










                    • @Callegar yes, __keys_cmd_set:nn is the internal to actually define a key and most/all key types are using it internally. All those constants are internals of l3keys, too, which are supposed to assure no naming conflicts.The variant checks whether the hook has been defined (cs_if_exist_use:cT), and if it does it inputs the control sequence and the next argument, stripping one pair of braces. So if foo_hook exists, cs_if_exist_use:cT foo_hook ##1 expands to foo_hook ##1 , and foo_hook can absorb that argument.
                      – Skillmon
                      Dec 18 at 17:48
















                    • Thanks Skillmon, that's interesting although by being a new on l3keys its hard for me to read its code to understand how you are touching its internals. If I get it correctly, __keys_cmd_set:nn is the internal used to associate code to the keys, 1st argument is the key path and 2nd one is the code itself, is this the OK? So you are imposing that after the regular code the hook code is used, is this correct? What puzzles me a bit is the role of all those constants. Furthermore, the variant is a little obscure to me in how it passes ##1 to the hook. Could you help me understand?
                      – Callegar
                      Dec 18 at 16:39










                    • @Callegar yes, __keys_cmd_set:nn is the internal to actually define a key and most/all key types are using it internally. All those constants are internals of l3keys, too, which are supposed to assure no naming conflicts.The variant checks whether the hook has been defined (cs_if_exist_use:cT), and if it does it inputs the control sequence and the next argument, stripping one pair of braces. So if foo_hook exists, cs_if_exist_use:cT foo_hook ##1 expands to foo_hook ##1 , and foo_hook can absorb that argument.
                      – Skillmon
                      Dec 18 at 17:48















                    Thanks Skillmon, that's interesting although by being a new on l3keys its hard for me to read its code to understand how you are touching its internals. If I get it correctly, __keys_cmd_set:nn is the internal used to associate code to the keys, 1st argument is the key path and 2nd one is the code itself, is this the OK? So you are imposing that after the regular code the hook code is used, is this correct? What puzzles me a bit is the role of all those constants. Furthermore, the variant is a little obscure to me in how it passes ##1 to the hook. Could you help me understand?
                    – Callegar
                    Dec 18 at 16:39




                    Thanks Skillmon, that's interesting although by being a new on l3keys its hard for me to read its code to understand how you are touching its internals. If I get it correctly, __keys_cmd_set:nn is the internal used to associate code to the keys, 1st argument is the key path and 2nd one is the code itself, is this the OK? So you are imposing that after the regular code the hook code is used, is this correct? What puzzles me a bit is the role of all those constants. Furthermore, the variant is a little obscure to me in how it passes ##1 to the hook. Could you help me understand?
                    – Callegar
                    Dec 18 at 16:39












                    @Callegar yes, __keys_cmd_set:nn is the internal to actually define a key and most/all key types are using it internally. All those constants are internals of l3keys, too, which are supposed to assure no naming conflicts.The variant checks whether the hook has been defined (cs_if_exist_use:cT), and if it does it inputs the control sequence and the next argument, stripping one pair of braces. So if foo_hook exists, cs_if_exist_use:cT foo_hook ##1 expands to foo_hook ##1 , and foo_hook can absorb that argument.
                    – Skillmon
                    Dec 18 at 17:48




                    @Callegar yes, __keys_cmd_set:nn is the internal to actually define a key and most/all key types are using it internally. All those constants are internals of l3keys, too, which are supposed to assure no naming conflicts.The variant checks whether the hook has been defined (cs_if_exist_use:cT), and if it does it inputs the control sequence and the next argument, stripping one pair of braces. So if foo_hook exists, cs_if_exist_use:cT foo_hook ##1 expands to foo_hook ##1 , and foo_hook can absorb that argument.
                    – Skillmon
                    Dec 18 at 17:48

















                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f465998%2fcode-hook-after-variable-setting-actions-in-l3keys%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown






                    Popular posts from this blog

                    How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

                    Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

                    How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?