Proof for this binomial coefficient's equation

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












4















For $k, l in mathbb N$
$$sum_i=0^ksum_j=0^lbinomi+ji=binomk+l+2k+1-1$$
How can I prove this?




I thought some ideas with Pascal's triangle, counting paths on the grid and simple deformation of the formula.



It can be checked here (wolframalpha).



If the proof is difficult, please let me know the main idea.



Sorry for my poor English.



Thank you.



EDIT:
I got the great and short proof using Hockey-stick identity by Anubhab Ghosal, but because of this form, I could also get the Robert Z's specialized answer.
Then I don't think it is fully duplicate.










share|cite|improve this question



















  • 1




    Possible duplicate of Prove $sumlimits_i=0^nbinomi+k-1k-1=binomn+kk$ (a.k.a. Hockey-Stick Identity)
    – user10354138
    Dec 12 at 10:07










  • @user10354138 The double sum is related Hockey-Stick Identity but it is not a duplicate of the linked question. Moreover OP asks for a combinatorial proof (counting paths...)
    – Robert Z
    Dec 12 at 11:30










  • @RobertZ The OP didn't ask for a combinatorial proof, only for a proof ("How can I prove this?" in the quote, not "How can I prove this combinatorially?"). It can be proved by applying the linked result twice, so it is a duplicate.
    – user10354138
    Dec 12 at 13:18










  • @user10354138 Fine. So we have a different opinion on this matter. Have a nice day.
    – Robert Z
    Dec 12 at 15:48















4















For $k, l in mathbb N$
$$sum_i=0^ksum_j=0^lbinomi+ji=binomk+l+2k+1-1$$
How can I prove this?




I thought some ideas with Pascal's triangle, counting paths on the grid and simple deformation of the formula.



It can be checked here (wolframalpha).



If the proof is difficult, please let me know the main idea.



Sorry for my poor English.



Thank you.



EDIT:
I got the great and short proof using Hockey-stick identity by Anubhab Ghosal, but because of this form, I could also get the Robert Z's specialized answer.
Then I don't think it is fully duplicate.










share|cite|improve this question



















  • 1




    Possible duplicate of Prove $sumlimits_i=0^nbinomi+k-1k-1=binomn+kk$ (a.k.a. Hockey-Stick Identity)
    – user10354138
    Dec 12 at 10:07










  • @user10354138 The double sum is related Hockey-Stick Identity but it is not a duplicate of the linked question. Moreover OP asks for a combinatorial proof (counting paths...)
    – Robert Z
    Dec 12 at 11:30










  • @RobertZ The OP didn't ask for a combinatorial proof, only for a proof ("How can I prove this?" in the quote, not "How can I prove this combinatorially?"). It can be proved by applying the linked result twice, so it is a duplicate.
    – user10354138
    Dec 12 at 13:18










  • @user10354138 Fine. So we have a different opinion on this matter. Have a nice day.
    – Robert Z
    Dec 12 at 15:48













4












4








4


3






For $k, l in mathbb N$
$$sum_i=0^ksum_j=0^lbinomi+ji=binomk+l+2k+1-1$$
How can I prove this?




I thought some ideas with Pascal's triangle, counting paths on the grid and simple deformation of the formula.



It can be checked here (wolframalpha).



If the proof is difficult, please let me know the main idea.



Sorry for my poor English.



Thank you.



EDIT:
I got the great and short proof using Hockey-stick identity by Anubhab Ghosal, but because of this form, I could also get the Robert Z's specialized answer.
Then I don't think it is fully duplicate.










share|cite|improve this question
















For $k, l in mathbb N$
$$sum_i=0^ksum_j=0^lbinomi+ji=binomk+l+2k+1-1$$
How can I prove this?




I thought some ideas with Pascal's triangle, counting paths on the grid and simple deformation of the formula.



It can be checked here (wolframalpha).



If the proof is difficult, please let me know the main idea.



Sorry for my poor English.



Thank you.



EDIT:
I got the great and short proof using Hockey-stick identity by Anubhab Ghosal, but because of this form, I could also get the Robert Z's specialized answer.
Then I don't think it is fully duplicate.







combinatorics summation binomial-coefficients






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 12 at 13:54









Martin Sleziak

44.6k7115270




44.6k7115270










asked Dec 12 at 9:58









るまし

235




235







  • 1




    Possible duplicate of Prove $sumlimits_i=0^nbinomi+k-1k-1=binomn+kk$ (a.k.a. Hockey-Stick Identity)
    – user10354138
    Dec 12 at 10:07










  • @user10354138 The double sum is related Hockey-Stick Identity but it is not a duplicate of the linked question. Moreover OP asks for a combinatorial proof (counting paths...)
    – Robert Z
    Dec 12 at 11:30










  • @RobertZ The OP didn't ask for a combinatorial proof, only for a proof ("How can I prove this?" in the quote, not "How can I prove this combinatorially?"). It can be proved by applying the linked result twice, so it is a duplicate.
    – user10354138
    Dec 12 at 13:18










  • @user10354138 Fine. So we have a different opinion on this matter. Have a nice day.
    – Robert Z
    Dec 12 at 15:48












  • 1




    Possible duplicate of Prove $sumlimits_i=0^nbinomi+k-1k-1=binomn+kk$ (a.k.a. Hockey-Stick Identity)
    – user10354138
    Dec 12 at 10:07










  • @user10354138 The double sum is related Hockey-Stick Identity but it is not a duplicate of the linked question. Moreover OP asks for a combinatorial proof (counting paths...)
    – Robert Z
    Dec 12 at 11:30










  • @RobertZ The OP didn't ask for a combinatorial proof, only for a proof ("How can I prove this?" in the quote, not "How can I prove this combinatorially?"). It can be proved by applying the linked result twice, so it is a duplicate.
    – user10354138
    Dec 12 at 13:18










  • @user10354138 Fine. So we have a different opinion on this matter. Have a nice day.
    – Robert Z
    Dec 12 at 15:48







1




1




Possible duplicate of Prove $sumlimits_i=0^nbinomi+k-1k-1=binomn+kk$ (a.k.a. Hockey-Stick Identity)
– user10354138
Dec 12 at 10:07




Possible duplicate of Prove $sumlimits_i=0^nbinomi+k-1k-1=binomn+kk$ (a.k.a. Hockey-Stick Identity)
– user10354138
Dec 12 at 10:07












@user10354138 The double sum is related Hockey-Stick Identity but it is not a duplicate of the linked question. Moreover OP asks for a combinatorial proof (counting paths...)
– Robert Z
Dec 12 at 11:30




@user10354138 The double sum is related Hockey-Stick Identity but it is not a duplicate of the linked question. Moreover OP asks for a combinatorial proof (counting paths...)
– Robert Z
Dec 12 at 11:30












@RobertZ The OP didn't ask for a combinatorial proof, only for a proof ("How can I prove this?" in the quote, not "How can I prove this combinatorially?"). It can be proved by applying the linked result twice, so it is a duplicate.
– user10354138
Dec 12 at 13:18




@RobertZ The OP didn't ask for a combinatorial proof, only for a proof ("How can I prove this?" in the quote, not "How can I prove this combinatorially?"). It can be proved by applying the linked result twice, so it is a duplicate.
– user10354138
Dec 12 at 13:18












@user10354138 Fine. So we have a different opinion on this matter. Have a nice day.
– Robert Z
Dec 12 at 15:48




@user10354138 Fine. So we have a different opinion on this matter. Have a nice day.
– Robert Z
Dec 12 at 15:48










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















3














Your idea about a combinatorial proof which is related to counting paths in a grid is a good one!



The binomial $binomi+ji$
counts the paths on the grid from $(0,0)$ to $(i,j)$ moving only right or up. So the double sum
$$sum_i=0^ksum_j=0^lbinomi+ji-1$$
counts the number of all such paths from $(0,0)$ to any vertex inside the rectangle $(0,k)times (0,l)$ different from $(0,0)$.



Now consider the paths from $(0,0)$ to $(k+1,l+1)$ different from $$(0,0)to (0,l+1)to (k+1,l+1)quadtextandquad
(0,0)to (k+1,0)to (k+1,l+1)$$
which are
$$binomk+l+2k+1-2.$$



Now any path of the first kind can be completed to a path of the second kind by changing direction, going to the boundary of the rectangle
$(0,k+1)times(0,l+1)$ and then moving to the corner $(k+1,l+1)$ along the side.



Is this a bijection between the first set of paths and the second one?






share|cite|improve this answer






























    5














    $$displaystylesum_i=0^ksum_j=0^lbinomi+ji=sum_i=0^ksum_j=i^i+lbinomji=sum_i=0^kbinomi+l+1i+1 ^[1]$$



    $$=sum_i=0^kbinomi+l+1l=sum_i=l^k+l+1binomil−1=binomk+l+2k+1-1 ^[1]$$



    1. Hockey-Stick Identity






    share|cite|improve this answer






























      0














      $newcommandbbx[1],bbox[15px,border:1px groove navy]displaystyle#1,
      newcommandbraces[1]leftlbrace,#1,rightrbrace
      newcommandbracks[1]leftlbrack,#1,rightrbrack
      newcommandddmathrmd
      newcommandds[1]displaystyle#1
      newcommandexpo[1],mathrme^#1,
      newcommandicmathrmi
      newcommandmc[1]mathcal#1
      newcommandmrm[1]mathrm#1
      newcommandpars[1]left(,#1,right)
      newcommandpartiald[3]fracpartial^#1 #2partial #3^#1
      newcommandroot[2],sqrt[#1],#2,,
      newcommandtotald[3]fracmathrmd^#1 #2mathrmd #3^#1
      newcommandverts[1]leftvert,#1,rightvert$




      $dssum_i = 0^ksum_j = 0^ell
      i + j choose i = k + ell + 2 choose k + 1 - 1: LARGE ?.qquad k, ell in mathbbN$
      .




      beginalign
      &bbox[10px,#ffd]sum_i = 0^ksum_j = 0^ell
      i + j choose i =
      sum_i = 0^ksum_j = 0^elli + j choose j =
      sum_i = 0^ksum_j = 0^ell-i - 1 choose j
      pars-1^,j
      \[5mm] = &
      sum_i = 0^ksum_j = 0^ellpars-1^,j
      bracksz^, jpars1 + z^-i - 1 =
      sum_i = 0^ksum_j = 0^ellpars-1^,j
      bracksz^01 over z^, j,pars1 + z^-i - 1
      \[5mm] = &
      bracksz^0sum_i = 0^kpars1 over 1 + z^i + 1
      sum_j = 0^ellpars-,1 over z^,j
      \[5mm] = &
      bracksz^0braces1 over 1 + z,
      bracks1/pars1 + z^k + 1 - 1 over 1/pars1 + z - 1
      bracespars-1/z^ell + 1 - 1 over -1/z - 1
      \[5mm] = &
      bracksz^0braces%
      1 - pars1 + z^k + 1 over -z
      ,1 over pars1 + z^k + 1
      bracespars-1^ell + 1 - z^ell + 1 over -1 - z,z over z^ell + 1
      \[5mm] = &
      bracksz^ell + 1braces1 - 1 over pars1 + z^k + 1
      bracesz^ell + 1 + pars-1^ell over 1 + z
      \[5mm] = &
      pars-1^ellbracksz^ell + 1
      brackspars1 + z^-1 - pars1 + z^-k - 2
      \[5mm] = &
      pars-1^ellbrackspars-1^ell + 1 - -k - 2 choose ell + 1
      \[5mm] = &
      -1 - pars-1^ell,-bracks-k - 2 + bracksell + 1 - 1 choose ell + 1pars-1^ell + 1
      \[5mm] = &
      -1 + k + ell + 2 choose ell + 1 =
      bbxk + ell + 2 choose k + 1 - 1
      endalign






      share|cite|improve this answer




















        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        );
        );
        , "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "69"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader:
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        ,
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );













        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3036489%2fproof-for-this-binomial-coefficients-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes








        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        3














        Your idea about a combinatorial proof which is related to counting paths in a grid is a good one!



        The binomial $binomi+ji$
        counts the paths on the grid from $(0,0)$ to $(i,j)$ moving only right or up. So the double sum
        $$sum_i=0^ksum_j=0^lbinomi+ji-1$$
        counts the number of all such paths from $(0,0)$ to any vertex inside the rectangle $(0,k)times (0,l)$ different from $(0,0)$.



        Now consider the paths from $(0,0)$ to $(k+1,l+1)$ different from $$(0,0)to (0,l+1)to (k+1,l+1)quadtextandquad
        (0,0)to (k+1,0)to (k+1,l+1)$$
        which are
        $$binomk+l+2k+1-2.$$



        Now any path of the first kind can be completed to a path of the second kind by changing direction, going to the boundary of the rectangle
        $(0,k+1)times(0,l+1)$ and then moving to the corner $(k+1,l+1)$ along the side.



        Is this a bijection between the first set of paths and the second one?






        share|cite|improve this answer



























          3














          Your idea about a combinatorial proof which is related to counting paths in a grid is a good one!



          The binomial $binomi+ji$
          counts the paths on the grid from $(0,0)$ to $(i,j)$ moving only right or up. So the double sum
          $$sum_i=0^ksum_j=0^lbinomi+ji-1$$
          counts the number of all such paths from $(0,0)$ to any vertex inside the rectangle $(0,k)times (0,l)$ different from $(0,0)$.



          Now consider the paths from $(0,0)$ to $(k+1,l+1)$ different from $$(0,0)to (0,l+1)to (k+1,l+1)quadtextandquad
          (0,0)to (k+1,0)to (k+1,l+1)$$
          which are
          $$binomk+l+2k+1-2.$$



          Now any path of the first kind can be completed to a path of the second kind by changing direction, going to the boundary of the rectangle
          $(0,k+1)times(0,l+1)$ and then moving to the corner $(k+1,l+1)$ along the side.



          Is this a bijection between the first set of paths and the second one?






          share|cite|improve this answer

























            3












            3








            3






            Your idea about a combinatorial proof which is related to counting paths in a grid is a good one!



            The binomial $binomi+ji$
            counts the paths on the grid from $(0,0)$ to $(i,j)$ moving only right or up. So the double sum
            $$sum_i=0^ksum_j=0^lbinomi+ji-1$$
            counts the number of all such paths from $(0,0)$ to any vertex inside the rectangle $(0,k)times (0,l)$ different from $(0,0)$.



            Now consider the paths from $(0,0)$ to $(k+1,l+1)$ different from $$(0,0)to (0,l+1)to (k+1,l+1)quadtextandquad
            (0,0)to (k+1,0)to (k+1,l+1)$$
            which are
            $$binomk+l+2k+1-2.$$



            Now any path of the first kind can be completed to a path of the second kind by changing direction, going to the boundary of the rectangle
            $(0,k+1)times(0,l+1)$ and then moving to the corner $(k+1,l+1)$ along the side.



            Is this a bijection between the first set of paths and the second one?






            share|cite|improve this answer














            Your idea about a combinatorial proof which is related to counting paths in a grid is a good one!



            The binomial $binomi+ji$
            counts the paths on the grid from $(0,0)$ to $(i,j)$ moving only right or up. So the double sum
            $$sum_i=0^ksum_j=0^lbinomi+ji-1$$
            counts the number of all such paths from $(0,0)$ to any vertex inside the rectangle $(0,k)times (0,l)$ different from $(0,0)$.



            Now consider the paths from $(0,0)$ to $(k+1,l+1)$ different from $$(0,0)to (0,l+1)to (k+1,l+1)quadtextandquad
            (0,0)to (k+1,0)to (k+1,l+1)$$
            which are
            $$binomk+l+2k+1-2.$$



            Now any path of the first kind can be completed to a path of the second kind by changing direction, going to the boundary of the rectangle
            $(0,k+1)times(0,l+1)$ and then moving to the corner $(k+1,l+1)$ along the side.



            Is this a bijection between the first set of paths and the second one?







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Dec 12 at 10:42

























            answered Dec 12 at 10:31









            Robert Z

            92.9k1060131




            92.9k1060131





















                5














                $$displaystylesum_i=0^ksum_j=0^lbinomi+ji=sum_i=0^ksum_j=i^i+lbinomji=sum_i=0^kbinomi+l+1i+1 ^[1]$$



                $$=sum_i=0^kbinomi+l+1l=sum_i=l^k+l+1binomil−1=binomk+l+2k+1-1 ^[1]$$



                1. Hockey-Stick Identity






                share|cite|improve this answer



























                  5














                  $$displaystylesum_i=0^ksum_j=0^lbinomi+ji=sum_i=0^ksum_j=i^i+lbinomji=sum_i=0^kbinomi+l+1i+1 ^[1]$$



                  $$=sum_i=0^kbinomi+l+1l=sum_i=l^k+l+1binomil−1=binomk+l+2k+1-1 ^[1]$$



                  1. Hockey-Stick Identity






                  share|cite|improve this answer

























                    5












                    5








                    5






                    $$displaystylesum_i=0^ksum_j=0^lbinomi+ji=sum_i=0^ksum_j=i^i+lbinomji=sum_i=0^kbinomi+l+1i+1 ^[1]$$



                    $$=sum_i=0^kbinomi+l+1l=sum_i=l^k+l+1binomil−1=binomk+l+2k+1-1 ^[1]$$



                    1. Hockey-Stick Identity






                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    $$displaystylesum_i=0^ksum_j=0^lbinomi+ji=sum_i=0^ksum_j=i^i+lbinomji=sum_i=0^kbinomi+l+1i+1 ^[1]$$



                    $$=sum_i=0^kbinomi+l+1l=sum_i=l^k+l+1binomil−1=binomk+l+2k+1-1 ^[1]$$



                    1. Hockey-Stick Identity







                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    edited Dec 12 at 10:17

























                    answered Dec 12 at 10:12









                    Anubhab Ghosal

                    74212




                    74212





















                        0














                        $newcommandbbx[1],bbox[15px,border:1px groove navy]displaystyle#1,
                        newcommandbraces[1]leftlbrace,#1,rightrbrace
                        newcommandbracks[1]leftlbrack,#1,rightrbrack
                        newcommandddmathrmd
                        newcommandds[1]displaystyle#1
                        newcommandexpo[1],mathrme^#1,
                        newcommandicmathrmi
                        newcommandmc[1]mathcal#1
                        newcommandmrm[1]mathrm#1
                        newcommandpars[1]left(,#1,right)
                        newcommandpartiald[3]fracpartial^#1 #2partial #3^#1
                        newcommandroot[2],sqrt[#1],#2,,
                        newcommandtotald[3]fracmathrmd^#1 #2mathrmd #3^#1
                        newcommandverts[1]leftvert,#1,rightvert$




                        $dssum_i = 0^ksum_j = 0^ell
                        i + j choose i = k + ell + 2 choose k + 1 - 1: LARGE ?.qquad k, ell in mathbbN$
                        .




                        beginalign
                        &bbox[10px,#ffd]sum_i = 0^ksum_j = 0^ell
                        i + j choose i =
                        sum_i = 0^ksum_j = 0^elli + j choose j =
                        sum_i = 0^ksum_j = 0^ell-i - 1 choose j
                        pars-1^,j
                        \[5mm] = &
                        sum_i = 0^ksum_j = 0^ellpars-1^,j
                        bracksz^, jpars1 + z^-i - 1 =
                        sum_i = 0^ksum_j = 0^ellpars-1^,j
                        bracksz^01 over z^, j,pars1 + z^-i - 1
                        \[5mm] = &
                        bracksz^0sum_i = 0^kpars1 over 1 + z^i + 1
                        sum_j = 0^ellpars-,1 over z^,j
                        \[5mm] = &
                        bracksz^0braces1 over 1 + z,
                        bracks1/pars1 + z^k + 1 - 1 over 1/pars1 + z - 1
                        bracespars-1/z^ell + 1 - 1 over -1/z - 1
                        \[5mm] = &
                        bracksz^0braces%
                        1 - pars1 + z^k + 1 over -z
                        ,1 over pars1 + z^k + 1
                        bracespars-1^ell + 1 - z^ell + 1 over -1 - z,z over z^ell + 1
                        \[5mm] = &
                        bracksz^ell + 1braces1 - 1 over pars1 + z^k + 1
                        bracesz^ell + 1 + pars-1^ell over 1 + z
                        \[5mm] = &
                        pars-1^ellbracksz^ell + 1
                        brackspars1 + z^-1 - pars1 + z^-k - 2
                        \[5mm] = &
                        pars-1^ellbrackspars-1^ell + 1 - -k - 2 choose ell + 1
                        \[5mm] = &
                        -1 - pars-1^ell,-bracks-k - 2 + bracksell + 1 - 1 choose ell + 1pars-1^ell + 1
                        \[5mm] = &
                        -1 + k + ell + 2 choose ell + 1 =
                        bbxk + ell + 2 choose k + 1 - 1
                        endalign






                        share|cite|improve this answer

























                          0














                          $newcommandbbx[1],bbox[15px,border:1px groove navy]displaystyle#1,
                          newcommandbraces[1]leftlbrace,#1,rightrbrace
                          newcommandbracks[1]leftlbrack,#1,rightrbrack
                          newcommandddmathrmd
                          newcommandds[1]displaystyle#1
                          newcommandexpo[1],mathrme^#1,
                          newcommandicmathrmi
                          newcommandmc[1]mathcal#1
                          newcommandmrm[1]mathrm#1
                          newcommandpars[1]left(,#1,right)
                          newcommandpartiald[3]fracpartial^#1 #2partial #3^#1
                          newcommandroot[2],sqrt[#1],#2,,
                          newcommandtotald[3]fracmathrmd^#1 #2mathrmd #3^#1
                          newcommandverts[1]leftvert,#1,rightvert$




                          $dssum_i = 0^ksum_j = 0^ell
                          i + j choose i = k + ell + 2 choose k + 1 - 1: LARGE ?.qquad k, ell in mathbbN$
                          .




                          beginalign
                          &bbox[10px,#ffd]sum_i = 0^ksum_j = 0^ell
                          i + j choose i =
                          sum_i = 0^ksum_j = 0^elli + j choose j =
                          sum_i = 0^ksum_j = 0^ell-i - 1 choose j
                          pars-1^,j
                          \[5mm] = &
                          sum_i = 0^ksum_j = 0^ellpars-1^,j
                          bracksz^, jpars1 + z^-i - 1 =
                          sum_i = 0^ksum_j = 0^ellpars-1^,j
                          bracksz^01 over z^, j,pars1 + z^-i - 1
                          \[5mm] = &
                          bracksz^0sum_i = 0^kpars1 over 1 + z^i + 1
                          sum_j = 0^ellpars-,1 over z^,j
                          \[5mm] = &
                          bracksz^0braces1 over 1 + z,
                          bracks1/pars1 + z^k + 1 - 1 over 1/pars1 + z - 1
                          bracespars-1/z^ell + 1 - 1 over -1/z - 1
                          \[5mm] = &
                          bracksz^0braces%
                          1 - pars1 + z^k + 1 over -z
                          ,1 over pars1 + z^k + 1
                          bracespars-1^ell + 1 - z^ell + 1 over -1 - z,z over z^ell + 1
                          \[5mm] = &
                          bracksz^ell + 1braces1 - 1 over pars1 + z^k + 1
                          bracesz^ell + 1 + pars-1^ell over 1 + z
                          \[5mm] = &
                          pars-1^ellbracksz^ell + 1
                          brackspars1 + z^-1 - pars1 + z^-k - 2
                          \[5mm] = &
                          pars-1^ellbrackspars-1^ell + 1 - -k - 2 choose ell + 1
                          \[5mm] = &
                          -1 - pars-1^ell,-bracks-k - 2 + bracksell + 1 - 1 choose ell + 1pars-1^ell + 1
                          \[5mm] = &
                          -1 + k + ell + 2 choose ell + 1 =
                          bbxk + ell + 2 choose k + 1 - 1
                          endalign






                          share|cite|improve this answer























                            0












                            0








                            0






                            $newcommandbbx[1],bbox[15px,border:1px groove navy]displaystyle#1,
                            newcommandbraces[1]leftlbrace,#1,rightrbrace
                            newcommandbracks[1]leftlbrack,#1,rightrbrack
                            newcommandddmathrmd
                            newcommandds[1]displaystyle#1
                            newcommandexpo[1],mathrme^#1,
                            newcommandicmathrmi
                            newcommandmc[1]mathcal#1
                            newcommandmrm[1]mathrm#1
                            newcommandpars[1]left(,#1,right)
                            newcommandpartiald[3]fracpartial^#1 #2partial #3^#1
                            newcommandroot[2],sqrt[#1],#2,,
                            newcommandtotald[3]fracmathrmd^#1 #2mathrmd #3^#1
                            newcommandverts[1]leftvert,#1,rightvert$




                            $dssum_i = 0^ksum_j = 0^ell
                            i + j choose i = k + ell + 2 choose k + 1 - 1: LARGE ?.qquad k, ell in mathbbN$
                            .




                            beginalign
                            &bbox[10px,#ffd]sum_i = 0^ksum_j = 0^ell
                            i + j choose i =
                            sum_i = 0^ksum_j = 0^elli + j choose j =
                            sum_i = 0^ksum_j = 0^ell-i - 1 choose j
                            pars-1^,j
                            \[5mm] = &
                            sum_i = 0^ksum_j = 0^ellpars-1^,j
                            bracksz^, jpars1 + z^-i - 1 =
                            sum_i = 0^ksum_j = 0^ellpars-1^,j
                            bracksz^01 over z^, j,pars1 + z^-i - 1
                            \[5mm] = &
                            bracksz^0sum_i = 0^kpars1 over 1 + z^i + 1
                            sum_j = 0^ellpars-,1 over z^,j
                            \[5mm] = &
                            bracksz^0braces1 over 1 + z,
                            bracks1/pars1 + z^k + 1 - 1 over 1/pars1 + z - 1
                            bracespars-1/z^ell + 1 - 1 over -1/z - 1
                            \[5mm] = &
                            bracksz^0braces%
                            1 - pars1 + z^k + 1 over -z
                            ,1 over pars1 + z^k + 1
                            bracespars-1^ell + 1 - z^ell + 1 over -1 - z,z over z^ell + 1
                            \[5mm] = &
                            bracksz^ell + 1braces1 - 1 over pars1 + z^k + 1
                            bracesz^ell + 1 + pars-1^ell over 1 + z
                            \[5mm] = &
                            pars-1^ellbracksz^ell + 1
                            brackspars1 + z^-1 - pars1 + z^-k - 2
                            \[5mm] = &
                            pars-1^ellbrackspars-1^ell + 1 - -k - 2 choose ell + 1
                            \[5mm] = &
                            -1 - pars-1^ell,-bracks-k - 2 + bracksell + 1 - 1 choose ell + 1pars-1^ell + 1
                            \[5mm] = &
                            -1 + k + ell + 2 choose ell + 1 =
                            bbxk + ell + 2 choose k + 1 - 1
                            endalign






                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            $newcommandbbx[1],bbox[15px,border:1px groove navy]displaystyle#1,
                            newcommandbraces[1]leftlbrace,#1,rightrbrace
                            newcommandbracks[1]leftlbrack,#1,rightrbrack
                            newcommandddmathrmd
                            newcommandds[1]displaystyle#1
                            newcommandexpo[1],mathrme^#1,
                            newcommandicmathrmi
                            newcommandmc[1]mathcal#1
                            newcommandmrm[1]mathrm#1
                            newcommandpars[1]left(,#1,right)
                            newcommandpartiald[3]fracpartial^#1 #2partial #3^#1
                            newcommandroot[2],sqrt[#1],#2,,
                            newcommandtotald[3]fracmathrmd^#1 #2mathrmd #3^#1
                            newcommandverts[1]leftvert,#1,rightvert$




                            $dssum_i = 0^ksum_j = 0^ell
                            i + j choose i = k + ell + 2 choose k + 1 - 1: LARGE ?.qquad k, ell in mathbbN$
                            .




                            beginalign
                            &bbox[10px,#ffd]sum_i = 0^ksum_j = 0^ell
                            i + j choose i =
                            sum_i = 0^ksum_j = 0^elli + j choose j =
                            sum_i = 0^ksum_j = 0^ell-i - 1 choose j
                            pars-1^,j
                            \[5mm] = &
                            sum_i = 0^ksum_j = 0^ellpars-1^,j
                            bracksz^, jpars1 + z^-i - 1 =
                            sum_i = 0^ksum_j = 0^ellpars-1^,j
                            bracksz^01 over z^, j,pars1 + z^-i - 1
                            \[5mm] = &
                            bracksz^0sum_i = 0^kpars1 over 1 + z^i + 1
                            sum_j = 0^ellpars-,1 over z^,j
                            \[5mm] = &
                            bracksz^0braces1 over 1 + z,
                            bracks1/pars1 + z^k + 1 - 1 over 1/pars1 + z - 1
                            bracespars-1/z^ell + 1 - 1 over -1/z - 1
                            \[5mm] = &
                            bracksz^0braces%
                            1 - pars1 + z^k + 1 over -z
                            ,1 over pars1 + z^k + 1
                            bracespars-1^ell + 1 - z^ell + 1 over -1 - z,z over z^ell + 1
                            \[5mm] = &
                            bracksz^ell + 1braces1 - 1 over pars1 + z^k + 1
                            bracesz^ell + 1 + pars-1^ell over 1 + z
                            \[5mm] = &
                            pars-1^ellbracksz^ell + 1
                            brackspars1 + z^-1 - pars1 + z^-k - 2
                            \[5mm] = &
                            pars-1^ellbrackspars-1^ell + 1 - -k - 2 choose ell + 1
                            \[5mm] = &
                            -1 - pars-1^ell,-bracks-k - 2 + bracksell + 1 - 1 choose ell + 1pars-1^ell + 1
                            \[5mm] = &
                            -1 + k + ell + 2 choose ell + 1 =
                            bbxk + ell + 2 choose k + 1 - 1
                            endalign







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered 2 days ago









                            Felix Marin

                            66.9k7107139




                            66.9k7107139



























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded
















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid


                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                                Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                                Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid


                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3036489%2fproof-for-this-binomial-coefficients-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown






                                Popular posts from this blog

                                How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

                                Bahrain

                                Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay