In the UK Conservative party, what happens when a vote of no confidence in the leader fails?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
So Theresa May is facing a vote of no confidence in her leadership of the Conservative party today. It's unclear if she will be ousted or not.
What happens if the vote fails?
united-kingdom conservative-party prime-minister
edited Dec 12 at 14:16
Steve Melnikoff
3,71611535
asked Dec 12 at 13:30
Machavity
15.2k44475
add a comment |
So Theresa May is facing a vote of no confidence in her leadership of the Conservative party today. It's unclear if she will be ousted or not.
What happens if the vote fails?
united-kingdom conservative-party prime-minister
edited Dec 12 at 14:16
Steve Melnikoff
3,71611535
asked Dec 12 at 13:30
Machavity
15.2k44475
add a comment |
So Theresa May is facing a vote of no confidence in her leadership of the Conservative party today. It's unclear if she will be ousted or not.
What happens if the vote fails?
united-kingdom conservative-party prime-minister
edited Dec 12 at 14:16
Steve Melnikoff
3,71611535
asked Dec 12 at 13:30
Machavity
15.2k44475
So Theresa May is facing a vote of no confidence in her leadership of the Conservative party today. It's unclear if she will be ousted or not.
What happens if the vote fails?
united-kingdom conservative-party prime-minister
united-kingdom conservative-party prime-minister
edited Dec 12 at 14:16
Steve Melnikoff
3,71611535
asked Dec 12 at 13:30
Machavity
15.2k44475
edited Dec 12 at 14:16
Steve Melnikoff
3,71611535
asked Dec 12 at 13:30
Machavity
15.2k44475
edited Dec 12 at 14:16
Steve Melnikoff
3,71611535
edited Dec 12 at 14:16
Steve Melnikoff
3,71611535
edited Dec 12 at 14:16
Steve Melnikoff
3,71611535
3,71611535
asked Dec 12 at 13:30
Machavity
15.2k44475
asked Dec 12 at 13:30
Machavity
15.2k44475
asked Dec 12 at 13:30
Machavity
15.2k44475
15.2k44475
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Under current Conservative Party rules, she remains leader, and cannot be subject to a party confidence vote for another year.
Being a party matter, none of this affects any parliamentary vote of no confidence which might take place.
Source: BBC News.
See also: Leadership Elections in the Conservative Party, House of Commons briefing paper 01366, July 2016.
answered Dec 12 at 13:52
Steve Melnikoff
3,71611535
6
It might be worth being explicit that these rules are these of the Conservative Party, rather than anything universal to British politics. In principle they could be changed, but not on a short timescale.
– origimbo
Dec 12 at 14:02
@origimbo: done; I've also added another source.
– Steve Melnikoff
Dec 12 at 14:17
Perhaps worth noting that she cannot be challenged by an in-party vote of no confidence for another year: it has no impact on Parliamentary procedure (eg a Parliamentary vote of no confidence). I know that's implicit in the question, but to a layman it may not be obvious
– Jon Story
Dec 12 at 15:38
@JonStory: fair point; updated.
– Steve Melnikoff
Dec 12 at 15:41
1
Also worth adding that it's generally accepted (at least in the press) that a narrow margin of victory would leave her in a tenuous position, from which the cabinet may be able to force her to resign.
– Matt Thrower
Dec 12 at 17:09
add a comment |
The (probably) failing attempt of vote of no confidence mostly shows how divided even the own conservative party is despite representing the PM.
If the vote fails, Mrs. May has definitely a stronger position than without such a vote even taking place. She would know there is no clear majority against her course and likely there is also no clear majority in the parliament. The fact that a no-confidence vote is even instigated would normally question the position of the PM. However, in May's current situation with criticism from all sides ever since she took office, a failed vote paradoxically supports her position (even if it is only the fact that there might be no persuasive alternative). Therefore, I believe once the vote has failed, May gained more time for her efforts either to renegotiate parts of the deal (which I doubt will happen in a substantial manner) or to set a new date for the vote on the deal.
If the vote succeeds, May will step down and probably a more pronounced Brexit supporter will take her place. I doubt however that neither Johnson nor Rees-Mogg would get the position.
To sum up, a failed vote would indirectly support the current position of May while a successful vote would end her period as PM.
answered Dec 12 at 19:37
Alex_P
435
1
Could you clarify that you meant neither, not either talking about Rees-Mogg and Johnson?
– gnasher729
Dec 13 at 9:33
@gnasher729, I meant that none of both (Rees-Mogg or Johnson) will be the next PM. I am not quite sure what you mean to clarify because I wroteneither Johnson nor Rees-Moggso I thought I am explicit enough.
– Alex_P
Dec 13 at 9:53
Note that now the vote has failed but Rees-Moog et al are claiming that the result proves she is weak and should resign anyway. A lot of the newspapers seem to agree. This means I am not sure she is in a stronger position apart from the fact they can't actually try to kick her out again for a year, merely impotently demand her resignation. Kind of funny coming from those like Rees-Mogg and Johnson who seem to so strongly feel the referendum result is a sacrosanct example of the democratic will.
– Eric Nolan
Dec 13 at 10:58
@EricNolan, That Rees-Mogg et at are demanding her resignation can be seen as almost instinctively. I personally would not put too much weight on parts of British media either. I believe it is on May's side now how to react. There is no reason for her to resign. She apparently does have the support or at least she does not have the opposition which can be regarded as passive acceptance (from my point of view).
– Alex_P
Dec 13 at 11:21
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "475"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f36066%2fin-the-uk-conservative-party-what-happens-when-a-vote-of-no-confidence-in-the-l%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Under current Conservative Party rules, she remains leader, and cannot be subject to a party confidence vote for another year.
Being a party matter, none of this affects any parliamentary vote of no confidence which might take place.
Source: BBC News.
See also: Leadership Elections in the Conservative Party, House of Commons briefing paper 01366, July 2016.
answered Dec 12 at 13:52
Steve Melnikoff
3,71611535
6
It might be worth being explicit that these rules are these of the Conservative Party, rather than anything universal to British politics. In principle they could be changed, but not on a short timescale.
– origimbo
Dec 12 at 14:02
@origimbo: done; I've also added another source.
– Steve Melnikoff
Dec 12 at 14:17
Perhaps worth noting that she cannot be challenged by an in-party vote of no confidence for another year: it has no impact on Parliamentary procedure (eg a Parliamentary vote of no confidence). I know that's implicit in the question, but to a layman it may not be obvious
– Jon Story
Dec 12 at 15:38
@JonStory: fair point; updated.
– Steve Melnikoff
Dec 12 at 15:41
1
Also worth adding that it's generally accepted (at least in the press) that a narrow margin of victory would leave her in a tenuous position, from which the cabinet may be able to force her to resign.
– Matt Thrower
Dec 12 at 17:09
add a comment |
Under current Conservative Party rules, she remains leader, and cannot be subject to a party confidence vote for another year.
Being a party matter, none of this affects any parliamentary vote of no confidence which might take place.
Source: BBC News.
See also: Leadership Elections in the Conservative Party, House of Commons briefing paper 01366, July 2016.
answered Dec 12 at 13:52
Steve Melnikoff
3,71611535
6
It might be worth being explicit that these rules are these of the Conservative Party, rather than anything universal to British politics. In principle they could be changed, but not on a short timescale.
– origimbo
Dec 12 at 14:02
@origimbo: done; I've also added another source.
– Steve Melnikoff
Dec 12 at 14:17
Perhaps worth noting that she cannot be challenged by an in-party vote of no confidence for another year: it has no impact on Parliamentary procedure (eg a Parliamentary vote of no confidence). I know that's implicit in the question, but to a layman it may not be obvious
– Jon Story
Dec 12 at 15:38
@JonStory: fair point; updated.
– Steve Melnikoff
Dec 12 at 15:41
1
Also worth adding that it's generally accepted (at least in the press) that a narrow margin of victory would leave her in a tenuous position, from which the cabinet may be able to force her to resign.
– Matt Thrower
Dec 12 at 17:09
add a comment |
Under current Conservative Party rules, she remains leader, and cannot be subject to a party confidence vote for another year.
Being a party matter, none of this affects any parliamentary vote of no confidence which might take place.
Source: BBC News.
See also: Leadership Elections in the Conservative Party, House of Commons briefing paper 01366, July 2016.
answered Dec 12 at 13:52
Steve Melnikoff
3,71611535
Under current Conservative Party rules, she remains leader, and cannot be subject to a party confidence vote for another year.
Being a party matter, none of this affects any parliamentary vote of no confidence which might take place.
Source: BBC News.
See also: Leadership Elections in the Conservative Party, House of Commons briefing paper 01366, July 2016.
answered Dec 12 at 13:52
Steve Melnikoff
3,71611535
edited Dec 12 at 15:41
answered Dec 12 at 13:52
Steve Melnikoff
3,71611535
answered Dec 12 at 13:52
Steve Melnikoff
3,71611535
answered Dec 12 at 13:52
Steve Melnikoff
3,71611535
3,71611535
6
It might be worth being explicit that these rules are these of the Conservative Party, rather than anything universal to British politics. In principle they could be changed, but not on a short timescale.
– origimbo
Dec 12 at 14:02
@origimbo: done; I've also added another source.
– Steve Melnikoff
Dec 12 at 14:17
Perhaps worth noting that she cannot be challenged by an in-party vote of no confidence for another year: it has no impact on Parliamentary procedure (eg a Parliamentary vote of no confidence). I know that's implicit in the question, but to a layman it may not be obvious
– Jon Story
Dec 12 at 15:38
@JonStory: fair point; updated.
– Steve Melnikoff
Dec 12 at 15:41
1
Also worth adding that it's generally accepted (at least in the press) that a narrow margin of victory would leave her in a tenuous position, from which the cabinet may be able to force her to resign.
– Matt Thrower
Dec 12 at 17:09
add a comment |
6
It might be worth being explicit that these rules are these of the Conservative Party, rather than anything universal to British politics. In principle they could be changed, but not on a short timescale.
– origimbo
Dec 12 at 14:02
@origimbo: done; I've also added another source.
– Steve Melnikoff
Dec 12 at 14:17
Perhaps worth noting that she cannot be challenged by an in-party vote of no confidence for another year: it has no impact on Parliamentary procedure (eg a Parliamentary vote of no confidence). I know that's implicit in the question, but to a layman it may not be obvious
– Jon Story
Dec 12 at 15:38
@JonStory: fair point; updated.
– Steve Melnikoff
Dec 12 at 15:41
1
Also worth adding that it's generally accepted (at least in the press) that a narrow margin of victory would leave her in a tenuous position, from which the cabinet may be able to force her to resign.
– Matt Thrower
Dec 12 at 17:09
6
6
It might be worth being explicit that these rules are these of the Conservative Party, rather than anything universal to British politics. In principle they could be changed, but not on a short timescale.
– origimbo
Dec 12 at 14:02
It might be worth being explicit that these rules are these of the Conservative Party, rather than anything universal to British politics. In principle they could be changed, but not on a short timescale.
– origimbo
Dec 12 at 14:02
@origimbo: done; I've also added another source.
– Steve Melnikoff
Dec 12 at 14:17
@origimbo: done; I've also added another source.
– Steve Melnikoff
Dec 12 at 14:17
Perhaps worth noting that she cannot be challenged by an in-party vote of no confidence for another year: it has no impact on Parliamentary procedure (eg a Parliamentary vote of no confidence). I know that's implicit in the question, but to a layman it may not be obvious
– Jon Story
Dec 12 at 15:38
Perhaps worth noting that she cannot be challenged by an in-party vote of no confidence for another year: it has no impact on Parliamentary procedure (eg a Parliamentary vote of no confidence). I know that's implicit in the question, but to a layman it may not be obvious
– Jon Story
Dec 12 at 15:38
@JonStory: fair point; updated.
– Steve Melnikoff
Dec 12 at 15:41
@JonStory: fair point; updated.
– Steve Melnikoff
Dec 12 at 15:41
1
1
Also worth adding that it's generally accepted (at least in the press) that a narrow margin of victory would leave her in a tenuous position, from which the cabinet may be able to force her to resign.
– Matt Thrower
Dec 12 at 17:09
Also worth adding that it's generally accepted (at least in the press) that a narrow margin of victory would leave her in a tenuous position, from which the cabinet may be able to force her to resign.
– Matt Thrower
Dec 12 at 17:09
add a comment |
The (probably) failing attempt of vote of no confidence mostly shows how divided even the own conservative party is despite representing the PM.
If the vote fails, Mrs. May has definitely a stronger position than without such a vote even taking place. She would know there is no clear majority against her course and likely there is also no clear majority in the parliament. The fact that a no-confidence vote is even instigated would normally question the position of the PM. However, in May's current situation with criticism from all sides ever since she took office, a failed vote paradoxically supports her position (even if it is only the fact that there might be no persuasive alternative). Therefore, I believe once the vote has failed, May gained more time for her efforts either to renegotiate parts of the deal (which I doubt will happen in a substantial manner) or to set a new date for the vote on the deal.
If the vote succeeds, May will step down and probably a more pronounced Brexit supporter will take her place. I doubt however that neither Johnson nor Rees-Mogg would get the position.
To sum up, a failed vote would indirectly support the current position of May while a successful vote would end her period as PM.
answered Dec 12 at 19:37
Alex_P
435
1
Could you clarify that you meant neither, not either talking about Rees-Mogg and Johnson?
– gnasher729
Dec 13 at 9:33
@gnasher729, I meant that none of both (Rees-Mogg or Johnson) will be the next PM. I am not quite sure what you mean to clarify because I wroteneither Johnson nor Rees-Moggso I thought I am explicit enough.
– Alex_P
Dec 13 at 9:53
Note that now the vote has failed but Rees-Moog et al are claiming that the result proves she is weak and should resign anyway. A lot of the newspapers seem to agree. This means I am not sure she is in a stronger position apart from the fact they can't actually try to kick her out again for a year, merely impotently demand her resignation. Kind of funny coming from those like Rees-Mogg and Johnson who seem to so strongly feel the referendum result is a sacrosanct example of the democratic will.
– Eric Nolan
Dec 13 at 10:58
@EricNolan, That Rees-Mogg et at are demanding her resignation can be seen as almost instinctively. I personally would not put too much weight on parts of British media either. I believe it is on May's side now how to react. There is no reason for her to resign. She apparently does have the support or at least she does not have the opposition which can be regarded as passive acceptance (from my point of view).
– Alex_P
Dec 13 at 11:21
add a comment |
The (probably) failing attempt of vote of no confidence mostly shows how divided even the own conservative party is despite representing the PM.
If the vote fails, Mrs. May has definitely a stronger position than without such a vote even taking place. She would know there is no clear majority against her course and likely there is also no clear majority in the parliament. The fact that a no-confidence vote is even instigated would normally question the position of the PM. However, in May's current situation with criticism from all sides ever since she took office, a failed vote paradoxically supports her position (even if it is only the fact that there might be no persuasive alternative). Therefore, I believe once the vote has failed, May gained more time for her efforts either to renegotiate parts of the deal (which I doubt will happen in a substantial manner) or to set a new date for the vote on the deal.
If the vote succeeds, May will step down and probably a more pronounced Brexit supporter will take her place. I doubt however that neither Johnson nor Rees-Mogg would get the position.
To sum up, a failed vote would indirectly support the current position of May while a successful vote would end her period as PM.
answered Dec 12 at 19:37
Alex_P
435
1
Could you clarify that you meant neither, not either talking about Rees-Mogg and Johnson?
– gnasher729
Dec 13 at 9:33
@gnasher729, I meant that none of both (Rees-Mogg or Johnson) will be the next PM. I am not quite sure what you mean to clarify because I wroteneither Johnson nor Rees-Moggso I thought I am explicit enough.
– Alex_P
Dec 13 at 9:53
Note that now the vote has failed but Rees-Moog et al are claiming that the result proves she is weak and should resign anyway. A lot of the newspapers seem to agree. This means I am not sure she is in a stronger position apart from the fact they can't actually try to kick her out again for a year, merely impotently demand her resignation. Kind of funny coming from those like Rees-Mogg and Johnson who seem to so strongly feel the referendum result is a sacrosanct example of the democratic will.
– Eric Nolan
Dec 13 at 10:58
@EricNolan, That Rees-Mogg et at are demanding her resignation can be seen as almost instinctively. I personally would not put too much weight on parts of British media either. I believe it is on May's side now how to react. There is no reason for her to resign. She apparently does have the support or at least she does not have the opposition which can be regarded as passive acceptance (from my point of view).
– Alex_P
Dec 13 at 11:21
add a comment |
The (probably) failing attempt of vote of no confidence mostly shows how divided even the own conservative party is despite representing the PM.
If the vote fails, Mrs. May has definitely a stronger position than without such a vote even taking place. She would know there is no clear majority against her course and likely there is also no clear majority in the parliament. The fact that a no-confidence vote is even instigated would normally question the position of the PM. However, in May's current situation with criticism from all sides ever since she took office, a failed vote paradoxically supports her position (even if it is only the fact that there might be no persuasive alternative). Therefore, I believe once the vote has failed, May gained more time for her efforts either to renegotiate parts of the deal (which I doubt will happen in a substantial manner) or to set a new date for the vote on the deal.
If the vote succeeds, May will step down and probably a more pronounced Brexit supporter will take her place. I doubt however that neither Johnson nor Rees-Mogg would get the position.
To sum up, a failed vote would indirectly support the current position of May while a successful vote would end her period as PM.
answered Dec 12 at 19:37
Alex_P
435
The (probably) failing attempt of vote of no confidence mostly shows how divided even the own conservative party is despite representing the PM.
If the vote fails, Mrs. May has definitely a stronger position than without such a vote even taking place. She would know there is no clear majority against her course and likely there is also no clear majority in the parliament. The fact that a no-confidence vote is even instigated would normally question the position of the PM. However, in May's current situation with criticism from all sides ever since she took office, a failed vote paradoxically supports her position (even if it is only the fact that there might be no persuasive alternative). Therefore, I believe once the vote has failed, May gained more time for her efforts either to renegotiate parts of the deal (which I doubt will happen in a substantial manner) or to set a new date for the vote on the deal.
If the vote succeeds, May will step down and probably a more pronounced Brexit supporter will take her place. I doubt however that neither Johnson nor Rees-Mogg would get the position.
To sum up, a failed vote would indirectly support the current position of May while a successful vote would end her period as PM.
answered Dec 12 at 19:37
Alex_P
435
edited Dec 13 at 7:33
answered Dec 12 at 19:37
Alex_P
435
answered Dec 12 at 19:37
Alex_P
435
answered Dec 12 at 19:37
Alex_P
435
435
1
Could you clarify that you meant neither, not either talking about Rees-Mogg and Johnson?
– gnasher729
Dec 13 at 9:33
@gnasher729, I meant that none of both (Rees-Mogg or Johnson) will be the next PM. I am not quite sure what you mean to clarify because I wroteneither Johnson nor Rees-Moggso I thought I am explicit enough.
– Alex_P
Dec 13 at 9:53
Note that now the vote has failed but Rees-Moog et al are claiming that the result proves she is weak and should resign anyway. A lot of the newspapers seem to agree. This means I am not sure she is in a stronger position apart from the fact they can't actually try to kick her out again for a year, merely impotently demand her resignation. Kind of funny coming from those like Rees-Mogg and Johnson who seem to so strongly feel the referendum result is a sacrosanct example of the democratic will.
– Eric Nolan
Dec 13 at 10:58
@EricNolan, That Rees-Mogg et at are demanding her resignation can be seen as almost instinctively. I personally would not put too much weight on parts of British media either. I believe it is on May's side now how to react. There is no reason for her to resign. She apparently does have the support or at least she does not have the opposition which can be regarded as passive acceptance (from my point of view).
– Alex_P
Dec 13 at 11:21
add a comment |
1
Could you clarify that you meant neither, not either talking about Rees-Mogg and Johnson?
– gnasher729
Dec 13 at 9:33
@gnasher729, I meant that none of both (Rees-Mogg or Johnson) will be the next PM. I am not quite sure what you mean to clarify because I wroteneither Johnson nor Rees-Moggso I thought I am explicit enough.
– Alex_P
Dec 13 at 9:53
Note that now the vote has failed but Rees-Moog et al are claiming that the result proves she is weak and should resign anyway. A lot of the newspapers seem to agree. This means I am not sure she is in a stronger position apart from the fact they can't actually try to kick her out again for a year, merely impotently demand her resignation. Kind of funny coming from those like Rees-Mogg and Johnson who seem to so strongly feel the referendum result is a sacrosanct example of the democratic will.
– Eric Nolan
Dec 13 at 10:58
@EricNolan, That Rees-Mogg et at are demanding her resignation can be seen as almost instinctively. I personally would not put too much weight on parts of British media either. I believe it is on May's side now how to react. There is no reason for her to resign. She apparently does have the support or at least she does not have the opposition which can be regarded as passive acceptance (from my point of view).
– Alex_P
Dec 13 at 11:21
1
1
Could you clarify that you meant neither, not either talking about Rees-Mogg and Johnson?
– gnasher729
Dec 13 at 9:33
Could you clarify that you meant neither, not either talking about Rees-Mogg and Johnson?
– gnasher729
Dec 13 at 9:33
@gnasher729, I meant that none of both (Rees-Mogg or Johnson) will be the next PM. I am not quite sure what you mean to clarify because I wrote
neither Johnson nor Rees-Mogg so I thought I am explicit enough.– Alex_P
Dec 13 at 9:53
@gnasher729, I meant that none of both (Rees-Mogg or Johnson) will be the next PM. I am not quite sure what you mean to clarify because I wrote
neither Johnson nor Rees-Mogg so I thought I am explicit enough.– Alex_P
Dec 13 at 9:53
Note that now the vote has failed but Rees-Moog et al are claiming that the result proves she is weak and should resign anyway. A lot of the newspapers seem to agree. This means I am not sure she is in a stronger position apart from the fact they can't actually try to kick her out again for a year, merely impotently demand her resignation. Kind of funny coming from those like Rees-Mogg and Johnson who seem to so strongly feel the referendum result is a sacrosanct example of the democratic will.
– Eric Nolan
Dec 13 at 10:58
Note that now the vote has failed but Rees-Moog et al are claiming that the result proves she is weak and should resign anyway. A lot of the newspapers seem to agree. This means I am not sure she is in a stronger position apart from the fact they can't actually try to kick her out again for a year, merely impotently demand her resignation. Kind of funny coming from those like Rees-Mogg and Johnson who seem to so strongly feel the referendum result is a sacrosanct example of the democratic will.
– Eric Nolan
Dec 13 at 10:58
@EricNolan, That Rees-Mogg et at are demanding her resignation can be seen as almost instinctively. I personally would not put too much weight on parts of British media either. I believe it is on May's side now how to react. There is no reason for her to resign. She apparently does have the support or at least she does not have the opposition which can be regarded as passive acceptance (from my point of view).
– Alex_P
Dec 13 at 11:21
@EricNolan, That Rees-Mogg et at are demanding her resignation can be seen as almost instinctively. I personally would not put too much weight on parts of British media either. I believe it is on May's side now how to react. There is no reason for her to resign. She apparently does have the support or at least she does not have the opposition which can be regarded as passive acceptance (from my point of view).
– Alex_P
Dec 13 at 11:21
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Politics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f36066%2fin-the-uk-conservative-party-what-happens-when-a-vote-of-no-confidence-in-the-l%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown