Package depends on mpich, cannot be installed because nothing provides libmpi.so.12

up vote
3
down vote

favorite

I have some software that uses MPI. I have created an RPM package from that.

The requirements are such that mpich and mpich-devel are included:

BuildRequires: libstdc++-devel autoconf gcc-c++ automake qmp qmp-devel environment-modules mpich-devel
BuildRequires: libxml2-devel
Requires: libstdc++ libxml2 qmp environment-modules mpich

(full spec file)

When I then try to install that via my Open Build Service home project, it tells me that the required library is not available:

# LC_ALL=C dnf install qdpxx qdpxx-devel --refresh --allowerasing
Error: nothing provides libmpi.so.12()(64bit) needed by qdpxx-1.44.0.git131-16.1.x86_64

The library is installed on my system, albeit not in a default path:

$ ls -l /usr/lib64/mpich/lib/
insgesamt 2780
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 13 31. Mär 2016 libfmpich.so -> libmpifort.so*
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 12 31. Mär 2016 libmpichcxx.so -> libmpicxx.so*
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 13 31. Mär 2016 libmpichf90.so -> libmpifort.so*
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 9 31. Mär 2016 libmpich.so -> libmpi.so*
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 19 31. Mär 2016 libmpicxx.so -> libmpicxx.so.12.1.0*
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 19 31. Mär 2016 libmpicxx.so.12 -> libmpicxx.so.12.1.0*
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 134088 31. Mär 2016 libmpicxx.so.12.1.0*
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 20 31. Mär 2016 libmpifort.so -> libmpifort.so.12.1.0*
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 20 31. Mär 2016 libmpifort.so.12 -> libmpifort.so.12.1.0*
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 228128 31. Mär 2016 libmpifort.so.12.1.0*
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 16 31. Mär 2016 libmpi.so -> libmpi.so.12.1.0*
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 16 31. Mär 2016 libmpi.so.12 -> libmpi.so.12.1.0*
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 2474552 31. Mär 2016 libmpi.so.12.1.0*
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 9 31. Mär 2016 libmpl.so -> libmpi.so*
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 9 31. Mär 2016 libopa.so -> libmpi.so*
drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 4096 5. Dez 18:08 pkgconfig/

What is missing? How do I get the package to recognize that mpich indeed provides the library libmpi.so.12?

$ rpm -q --provides mpich
libmpi.so.12()(64bit)(mpich-x86_64)
libmpicxx.so.12()(64bit)(mpich-x86_64)
libmpifort.so.12()(64bit)(mpich-x86_64)
mpi
mpich = 3.2-6.fc25
mpich(x86-64) = 3.2-6.fc25
mpich2 = 3.2

edited Mar 30 '17 at 20:32

asked Mar 30 '17 at 20:02

Martin Ueding

1,28311127

Is there a rpm file that libmpi.so.12 exists in? (That is, is there a RPM that provides that according to the RPM specifications?)
– thrig
Mar 30 '17 at 20:12

The package mpich-3.2-6.fc25.x86_64 contains the file /usr/lib64/mpich/lib/libmpi.so.12.
– Martin Ueding
Mar 30 '17 at 20:19

Okay, what does rpm -q --provides mpich show as that package providing?
– thrig
Mar 30 '17 at 20:30

I have added that to the end of the question. Seems like it is contained in there.
– Martin Ueding
Mar 30 '17 at 20:32

Hmm, can you manually rpm -i qdpxx... to see if it's RPM or dnf being derpy?
– thrig
Mar 30 '17 at 21:04

|
show 2 more comments

up vote
3
down vote

favorite

I have some software that uses MPI. I have created an RPM package from that.

The requirements are such that mpich and mpich-devel are included:

BuildRequires: libstdc++-devel autoconf gcc-c++ automake qmp qmp-devel environment-modules mpich-devel
BuildRequires: libxml2-devel
Requires: libstdc++ libxml2 qmp environment-modules mpich

(full spec file)

When I then try to install that via my Open Build Service home project, it tells me that the required library is not available:

# LC_ALL=C dnf install qdpxx qdpxx-devel --refresh --allowerasing
Error: nothing provides libmpi.so.12()(64bit) needed by qdpxx-1.44.0.git131-16.1.x86_64

The library is installed on my system, albeit not in a default path:

$ ls -l /usr/lib64/mpich/lib/
insgesamt 2780
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 13 31. Mär 2016 libfmpich.so -> libmpifort.so*
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 12 31. Mär 2016 libmpichcxx.so -> libmpicxx.so*
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 13 31. Mär 2016 libmpichf90.so -> libmpifort.so*
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 9 31. Mär 2016 libmpich.so -> libmpi.so*
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 19 31. Mär 2016 libmpicxx.so -> libmpicxx.so.12.1.0*
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 19 31. Mär 2016 libmpicxx.so.12 -> libmpicxx.so.12.1.0*
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 134088 31. Mär 2016 libmpicxx.so.12.1.0*
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 20 31. Mär 2016 libmpifort.so -> libmpifort.so.12.1.0*
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 20 31. Mär 2016 libmpifort.so.12 -> libmpifort.so.12.1.0*
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 228128 31. Mär 2016 libmpifort.so.12.1.0*
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 16 31. Mär 2016 libmpi.so -> libmpi.so.12.1.0*
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 16 31. Mär 2016 libmpi.so.12 -> libmpi.so.12.1.0*
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 2474552 31. Mär 2016 libmpi.so.12.1.0*
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 9 31. Mär 2016 libmpl.so -> libmpi.so*
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 9 31. Mär 2016 libopa.so -> libmpi.so*
drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 4096 5. Dez 18:08 pkgconfig/

What is missing? How do I get the package to recognize that mpich indeed provides the library libmpi.so.12?

$ rpm -q --provides mpich
libmpi.so.12()(64bit)(mpich-x86_64)
libmpicxx.so.12()(64bit)(mpich-x86_64)
libmpifort.so.12()(64bit)(mpich-x86_64)
mpi
mpich = 3.2-6.fc25
mpich(x86-64) = 3.2-6.fc25
mpich2 = 3.2

edited Mar 30 '17 at 20:32

asked Mar 30 '17 at 20:02

Martin Ueding

1,28311127

Is there a rpm file that libmpi.so.12 exists in? (That is, is there a RPM that provides that according to the RPM specifications?)
– thrig
Mar 30 '17 at 20:12

The package mpich-3.2-6.fc25.x86_64 contains the file /usr/lib64/mpich/lib/libmpi.so.12.
– Martin Ueding
Mar 30 '17 at 20:19

Okay, what does rpm -q --provides mpich show as that package providing?
– thrig
Mar 30 '17 at 20:30

I have added that to the end of the question. Seems like it is contained in there.
– Martin Ueding
Mar 30 '17 at 20:32

Hmm, can you manually rpm -i qdpxx... to see if it's RPM or dnf being derpy?
– thrig
Mar 30 '17 at 21:04

|
show 2 more comments

up vote
3
down vote

favorite

I have some software that uses MPI. I have created an RPM package from that.

The requirements are such that mpich and mpich-devel are included:

BuildRequires: libstdc++-devel autoconf gcc-c++ automake qmp qmp-devel environment-modules mpich-devel
BuildRequires: libxml2-devel
Requires: libstdc++ libxml2 qmp environment-modules mpich

(full spec file)

When I then try to install that via my Open Build Service home project, it tells me that the required library is not available:

# LC_ALL=C dnf install qdpxx qdpxx-devel --refresh --allowerasing
Error: nothing provides libmpi.so.12()(64bit) needed by qdpxx-1.44.0.git131-16.1.x86_64

The library is installed on my system, albeit not in a default path:

$ ls -l /usr/lib64/mpich/lib/
insgesamt 2780
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 13 31. Mär 2016 libfmpich.so -> libmpifort.so*
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 12 31. Mär 2016 libmpichcxx.so -> libmpicxx.so*
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 13 31. Mär 2016 libmpichf90.so -> libmpifort.so*
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 9 31. Mär 2016 libmpich.so -> libmpi.so*
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 19 31. Mär 2016 libmpicxx.so -> libmpicxx.so.12.1.0*
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 19 31. Mär 2016 libmpicxx.so.12 -> libmpicxx.so.12.1.0*
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 134088 31. Mär 2016 libmpicxx.so.12.1.0*
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 20 31. Mär 2016 libmpifort.so -> libmpifort.so.12.1.0*
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 20 31. Mär 2016 libmpifort.so.12 -> libmpifort.so.12.1.0*
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 228128 31. Mär 2016 libmpifort.so.12.1.0*
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 16 31. Mär 2016 libmpi.so -> libmpi.so.12.1.0*
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 16 31. Mär 2016 libmpi.so.12 -> libmpi.so.12.1.0*
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 2474552 31. Mär 2016 libmpi.so.12.1.0*
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 9 31. Mär 2016 libmpl.so -> libmpi.so*
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 9 31. Mär 2016 libopa.so -> libmpi.so*
drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 4096 5. Dez 18:08 pkgconfig/

What is missing? How do I get the package to recognize that mpich indeed provides the library libmpi.so.12?

$ rpm -q --provides mpich
libmpi.so.12()(64bit)(mpich-x86_64)
libmpicxx.so.12()(64bit)(mpich-x86_64)
libmpifort.so.12()(64bit)(mpich-x86_64)
mpi
mpich = 3.2-6.fc25
mpich(x86-64) = 3.2-6.fc25
mpich2 = 3.2

edited Mar 30 '17 at 20:32

asked Mar 30 '17 at 20:02

Martin Ueding

1,28311127

I have some software that uses MPI. I have created an RPM package from that.

The requirements are such that mpich and mpich-devel are included:

BuildRequires: libstdc++-devel autoconf gcc-c++ automake qmp qmp-devel environment-modules mpich-devel
BuildRequires: libxml2-devel
Requires: libstdc++ libxml2 qmp environment-modules mpich

(full spec file)

When I then try to install that via my Open Build Service home project, it tells me that the required library is not available:

# LC_ALL=C dnf install qdpxx qdpxx-devel --refresh --allowerasing
Error: nothing provides libmpi.so.12()(64bit) needed by qdpxx-1.44.0.git131-16.1.x86_64

The library is installed on my system, albeit not in a default path:

$ ls -l /usr/lib64/mpich/lib/
insgesamt 2780
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 13 31. Mär 2016 libfmpich.so -> libmpifort.so*
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 12 31. Mär 2016 libmpichcxx.so -> libmpicxx.so*
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 13 31. Mär 2016 libmpichf90.so -> libmpifort.so*
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 9 31. Mär 2016 libmpich.so -> libmpi.so*
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 19 31. Mär 2016 libmpicxx.so -> libmpicxx.so.12.1.0*
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 19 31. Mär 2016 libmpicxx.so.12 -> libmpicxx.so.12.1.0*
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 134088 31. Mär 2016 libmpicxx.so.12.1.0*
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 20 31. Mär 2016 libmpifort.so -> libmpifort.so.12.1.0*
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 20 31. Mär 2016 libmpifort.so.12 -> libmpifort.so.12.1.0*
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 228128 31. Mär 2016 libmpifort.so.12.1.0*
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 16 31. Mär 2016 libmpi.so -> libmpi.so.12.1.0*
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 16 31. Mär 2016 libmpi.so.12 -> libmpi.so.12.1.0*
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 2474552 31. Mär 2016 libmpi.so.12.1.0*
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 9 31. Mär 2016 libmpl.so -> libmpi.so*
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 9 31. Mär 2016 libopa.so -> libmpi.so*
drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 4096 5. Dez 18:08 pkgconfig/

What is missing? How do I get the package to recognize that mpich indeed provides the library libmpi.so.12?

$ rpm -q --provides mpich
libmpi.so.12()(64bit)(mpich-x86_64)
libmpicxx.so.12()(64bit)(mpich-x86_64)
libmpifort.so.12()(64bit)(mpich-x86_64)
mpi
mpich = 3.2-6.fc25
mpich(x86-64) = 3.2-6.fc25
mpich2 = 3.2

fedora rpm packaging

edited Mar 30 '17 at 20:32

asked Mar 30 '17 at 20:02

Martin Ueding

1,28311127

edited Mar 30 '17 at 20:32

asked Mar 30 '17 at 20:02

Martin Ueding

1,28311127

edited Mar 30 '17 at 20:32

asked Mar 30 '17 at 20:02

Martin Ueding

1,28311127

asked Mar 30 '17 at 20:02

Martin Ueding

1,28311127

asked Mar 30 '17 at 20:02

Martin Ueding

1,28311127

Is there a rpm file that libmpi.so.12 exists in? (That is, is there a RPM that provides that according to the RPM specifications?)
– thrig
Mar 30 '17 at 20:12

The package mpich-3.2-6.fc25.x86_64 contains the file /usr/lib64/mpich/lib/libmpi.so.12.
– Martin Ueding
Mar 30 '17 at 20:19

Okay, what does rpm -q --provides mpich show as that package providing?
– thrig
Mar 30 '17 at 20:30

I have added that to the end of the question. Seems like it is contained in there.
– Martin Ueding
Mar 30 '17 at 20:32

Hmm, can you manually rpm -i qdpxx... to see if it's RPM or dnf being derpy?
– thrig
Mar 30 '17 at 21:04

|
show 2 more comments

Is there a rpm file that libmpi.so.12 exists in? (That is, is there a RPM that provides that according to the RPM specifications?)
– thrig
Mar 30 '17 at 20:12

The package mpich-3.2-6.fc25.x86_64 contains the file /usr/lib64/mpich/lib/libmpi.so.12.
– Martin Ueding
Mar 30 '17 at 20:19

Okay, what does rpm -q --provides mpich show as that package providing?
– thrig
Mar 30 '17 at 20:30

I have added that to the end of the question. Seems like it is contained in there.
– Martin Ueding
Mar 30 '17 at 20:32

Hmm, can you manually rpm -i qdpxx... to see if it's RPM or dnf being derpy?
– thrig
Mar 30 '17 at 21:04

Is there a rpm file that libmpi.so.12 exists in? (That is, is there a RPM that provides that according to the RPM specifications?)
– thrig
Mar 30 '17 at 20:12

The package mpich-3.2-6.fc25.x86_64 contains the file /usr/lib64/mpich/lib/libmpi.so.12.
– Martin Ueding
Mar 30 '17 at 20:19

Okay, what does rpm -q --provides mpich show as that package providing?
– thrig
Mar 30 '17 at 20:30

I have added that to the end of the question. Seems like it is contained in there.
– Martin Ueding
Mar 30 '17 at 20:32

Hmm, can you manually rpm -i qdpxx... to see if it's RPM or dnf being derpy?
– thrig
Mar 30 '17 at 21:04

|
show 2 more comments

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

up vote
0
down vote

The answer is in the packaging guidelines 1.

MPI implementation specific files MUST be installed in the directories used by the used MPI compiler ($MPI_BIN, $MPI_LIB and so on).

For mpich, binaries must be in /usr/lib64/mpich/bin

answered Nov 29 at 8:32

Bruno Guerraz

add a comment |

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);

);

draft saved

draft discarded

StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f354923%2fpackage-depends-on-mpich-cannot-be-installed-because-nothing-provides-libmpi-so%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

up vote
0
down vote

The answer is in the packaging guidelines 1.

MPI implementation specific files MUST be installed in the directories used by the used MPI compiler ($MPI_BIN, $MPI_LIB and so on).

For mpich, binaries must be in /usr/lib64/mpich/bin

answered Nov 29 at 8:32

Bruno Guerraz

add a comment |

up vote
0
down vote

The answer is in the packaging guidelines 1.

MPI implementation specific files MUST be installed in the directories used by the used MPI compiler ($MPI_BIN, $MPI_LIB and so on).

For mpich, binaries must be in /usr/lib64/mpich/bin

answered Nov 29 at 8:32

Bruno Guerraz

add a comment |

up vote
0
down vote

The answer is in the packaging guidelines 1.

MPI implementation specific files MUST be installed in the directories used by the used MPI compiler ($MPI_BIN, $MPI_LIB and so on).

For mpich, binaries must be in /usr/lib64/mpich/bin

answered Nov 29 at 8:32

Bruno Guerraz

The answer is in the packaging guidelines 1.

MPI implementation specific files MUST be installed in the directories used by the used MPI compiler ($MPI_BIN, $MPI_LIB and so on).

For mpich, binaries must be in /usr/lib64/mpich/bin

answered Nov 29 at 8:32

Bruno Guerraz

answered Nov 29 at 8:32

Bruno Guerraz

answered Nov 29 at 8:32

Bruno Guerraz

answered Nov 29 at 8:32

Bruno Guerraz

add a comment |

draft saved

draft discarded

Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!

Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …

Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.

Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.

Please pay close attention to the following guidance:

Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …

Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.

draft saved

draft discarded

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Name

Required, but never shown

Name

Required, but never shown

搜尋此網誌

mjhjmtu