Device name to use in luks commands for LVM LUKS

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












1














Can somebody with more LUKS LVM experience than me tell me what the correct device name is to use in this context.



I'm trying to follow some instructions about using clevis and tang in CentOS. The instructions are pretty simple, yet after installing the tang server, I run into problems right away on the clevis portion.




> clevis bind luks -d /dev/mapper/luks-cee2a805-188f-44b6-b577-879243c0eb6c tang "url":"http://official.server.company.com"



Device /dev/mapper/luks-cee2a805-188f-44b6-b577-879243c0eb6c is not a valid LUKS device.




This is a whole-volume LUKS volume on the main LVM partition and I would have thought the above name is right. Here's the output of lsblk



> lsblk -p

NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
/dev/sda 8:0 0 50G 0 disk
├─/dev/sda1 8:1 0 1G 0 part /boot
├─/dev/sda2 8:2 0 2G 0 part [SWAP]
└─/dev/sda3 8:3 0 47G 0 part
└─/dev/mapper/vg_root-lv_root 253:0 0 47G 0 lvm
└─/dev/mapper/luks-cee2a805-188f-44b6-b577-879243c0eb6c 253:1 0 47G 0 crypt /
/dev/sr0 11:0 1 1024M 0 rom


But I can't seem to find the right device to pass to clevis bind or any other LUKS command:



> luksmeta show -d /dev/mapper/luks-cee2a805-188f-44b6-b577-879243c0eb6c
Unable to read LUKSv1 header (/dev/mapper/luks-cee2a805-188f-44b6-b577-879243c0eb6c): Invalid argument

> cryptsetup luksDump /dev/mapper/luks-cee2a805-188f-44b6-b577-879243c0eb6c
Device /dev/mapper/luks-cee2a805-188f-44b6-b577-879243c0eb6c is not a valid LUKS device.


I've also tried, for completeness not necessarily because I thought it made any sense /dev/sda, /dev/sda3.



I'm stuck, any tips greatly appreciated.




  • p.s. I know my reputation is a mere 101 on Unix&Linux but I'm a 2000+ on StackOverflow, so I do generall know what I'm doing.

  • https://rhelblog.redhat.com/2018/04/13/an-easier-way-to-manage-disk-decryption-at-boot-with-red-hat-enterprise-linux-7-5-using-nbde/

  • https://blog.delouw.ch/2017/10/01/leveraging-network-bound-disk-encryption-at-enterprise-scale/









share|improve this question























  • I could have sworn I'd tried it, but that's it. Thanks! (I feel really dumb.)
    – Mort
    Dec 14 at 19:48
















1














Can somebody with more LUKS LVM experience than me tell me what the correct device name is to use in this context.



I'm trying to follow some instructions about using clevis and tang in CentOS. The instructions are pretty simple, yet after installing the tang server, I run into problems right away on the clevis portion.




> clevis bind luks -d /dev/mapper/luks-cee2a805-188f-44b6-b577-879243c0eb6c tang "url":"http://official.server.company.com"



Device /dev/mapper/luks-cee2a805-188f-44b6-b577-879243c0eb6c is not a valid LUKS device.




This is a whole-volume LUKS volume on the main LVM partition and I would have thought the above name is right. Here's the output of lsblk



> lsblk -p

NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
/dev/sda 8:0 0 50G 0 disk
├─/dev/sda1 8:1 0 1G 0 part /boot
├─/dev/sda2 8:2 0 2G 0 part [SWAP]
└─/dev/sda3 8:3 0 47G 0 part
└─/dev/mapper/vg_root-lv_root 253:0 0 47G 0 lvm
└─/dev/mapper/luks-cee2a805-188f-44b6-b577-879243c0eb6c 253:1 0 47G 0 crypt /
/dev/sr0 11:0 1 1024M 0 rom


But I can't seem to find the right device to pass to clevis bind or any other LUKS command:



> luksmeta show -d /dev/mapper/luks-cee2a805-188f-44b6-b577-879243c0eb6c
Unable to read LUKSv1 header (/dev/mapper/luks-cee2a805-188f-44b6-b577-879243c0eb6c): Invalid argument

> cryptsetup luksDump /dev/mapper/luks-cee2a805-188f-44b6-b577-879243c0eb6c
Device /dev/mapper/luks-cee2a805-188f-44b6-b577-879243c0eb6c is not a valid LUKS device.


I've also tried, for completeness not necessarily because I thought it made any sense /dev/sda, /dev/sda3.



I'm stuck, any tips greatly appreciated.




  • p.s. I know my reputation is a mere 101 on Unix&Linux but I'm a 2000+ on StackOverflow, so I do generall know what I'm doing.

  • https://rhelblog.redhat.com/2018/04/13/an-easier-way-to-manage-disk-decryption-at-boot-with-red-hat-enterprise-linux-7-5-using-nbde/

  • https://blog.delouw.ch/2017/10/01/leveraging-network-bound-disk-encryption-at-enterprise-scale/









share|improve this question























  • I could have sworn I'd tried it, but that's it. Thanks! (I feel really dumb.)
    – Mort
    Dec 14 at 19:48














1












1








1







Can somebody with more LUKS LVM experience than me tell me what the correct device name is to use in this context.



I'm trying to follow some instructions about using clevis and tang in CentOS. The instructions are pretty simple, yet after installing the tang server, I run into problems right away on the clevis portion.




> clevis bind luks -d /dev/mapper/luks-cee2a805-188f-44b6-b577-879243c0eb6c tang "url":"http://official.server.company.com"



Device /dev/mapper/luks-cee2a805-188f-44b6-b577-879243c0eb6c is not a valid LUKS device.




This is a whole-volume LUKS volume on the main LVM partition and I would have thought the above name is right. Here's the output of lsblk



> lsblk -p

NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
/dev/sda 8:0 0 50G 0 disk
├─/dev/sda1 8:1 0 1G 0 part /boot
├─/dev/sda2 8:2 0 2G 0 part [SWAP]
└─/dev/sda3 8:3 0 47G 0 part
└─/dev/mapper/vg_root-lv_root 253:0 0 47G 0 lvm
└─/dev/mapper/luks-cee2a805-188f-44b6-b577-879243c0eb6c 253:1 0 47G 0 crypt /
/dev/sr0 11:0 1 1024M 0 rom


But I can't seem to find the right device to pass to clevis bind or any other LUKS command:



> luksmeta show -d /dev/mapper/luks-cee2a805-188f-44b6-b577-879243c0eb6c
Unable to read LUKSv1 header (/dev/mapper/luks-cee2a805-188f-44b6-b577-879243c0eb6c): Invalid argument

> cryptsetup luksDump /dev/mapper/luks-cee2a805-188f-44b6-b577-879243c0eb6c
Device /dev/mapper/luks-cee2a805-188f-44b6-b577-879243c0eb6c is not a valid LUKS device.


I've also tried, for completeness not necessarily because I thought it made any sense /dev/sda, /dev/sda3.



I'm stuck, any tips greatly appreciated.




  • p.s. I know my reputation is a mere 101 on Unix&Linux but I'm a 2000+ on StackOverflow, so I do generall know what I'm doing.

  • https://rhelblog.redhat.com/2018/04/13/an-easier-way-to-manage-disk-decryption-at-boot-with-red-hat-enterprise-linux-7-5-using-nbde/

  • https://blog.delouw.ch/2017/10/01/leveraging-network-bound-disk-encryption-at-enterprise-scale/









share|improve this question















Can somebody with more LUKS LVM experience than me tell me what the correct device name is to use in this context.



I'm trying to follow some instructions about using clevis and tang in CentOS. The instructions are pretty simple, yet after installing the tang server, I run into problems right away on the clevis portion.




> clevis bind luks -d /dev/mapper/luks-cee2a805-188f-44b6-b577-879243c0eb6c tang "url":"http://official.server.company.com"



Device /dev/mapper/luks-cee2a805-188f-44b6-b577-879243c0eb6c is not a valid LUKS device.




This is a whole-volume LUKS volume on the main LVM partition and I would have thought the above name is right. Here's the output of lsblk



> lsblk -p

NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
/dev/sda 8:0 0 50G 0 disk
├─/dev/sda1 8:1 0 1G 0 part /boot
├─/dev/sda2 8:2 0 2G 0 part [SWAP]
└─/dev/sda3 8:3 0 47G 0 part
└─/dev/mapper/vg_root-lv_root 253:0 0 47G 0 lvm
└─/dev/mapper/luks-cee2a805-188f-44b6-b577-879243c0eb6c 253:1 0 47G 0 crypt /
/dev/sr0 11:0 1 1024M 0 rom


But I can't seem to find the right device to pass to clevis bind or any other LUKS command:



> luksmeta show -d /dev/mapper/luks-cee2a805-188f-44b6-b577-879243c0eb6c
Unable to read LUKSv1 header (/dev/mapper/luks-cee2a805-188f-44b6-b577-879243c0eb6c): Invalid argument

> cryptsetup luksDump /dev/mapper/luks-cee2a805-188f-44b6-b577-879243c0eb6c
Device /dev/mapper/luks-cee2a805-188f-44b6-b577-879243c0eb6c is not a valid LUKS device.


I've also tried, for completeness not necessarily because I thought it made any sense /dev/sda, /dev/sda3.



I'm stuck, any tips greatly appreciated.




  • p.s. I know my reputation is a mere 101 on Unix&Linux but I'm a 2000+ on StackOverflow, so I do generall know what I'm doing.

  • https://rhelblog.redhat.com/2018/04/13/an-easier-way-to-manage-disk-decryption-at-boot-with-red-hat-enterprise-linux-7-5-using-nbde/

  • https://blog.delouw.ch/2017/10/01/leveraging-network-bound-disk-encryption-at-enterprise-scale/






centos luks disk-encryption






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Dec 14 at 19:49

























asked Dec 14 at 19:24









Mort

1085




1085











  • I could have sworn I'd tried it, but that's it. Thanks! (I feel really dumb.)
    – Mort
    Dec 14 at 19:48

















  • I could have sworn I'd tried it, but that's it. Thanks! (I feel really dumb.)
    – Mort
    Dec 14 at 19:48
















I could have sworn I'd tried it, but that's it. Thanks! (I feel really dumb.)
– Mort
Dec 14 at 19:48





I could have sworn I'd tried it, but that's it. Thanks! (I feel really dumb.)
– Mort
Dec 14 at 19:48











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














From RedHat blog link you posted, it appears clevis wants the encrypted block device (not the decrypted one). In your lsblk output, that is /dev/mapper/vg_root-lv_root. This sort of makes sense; the decrypted one doesn't exist until after the keys are supplied.



You can confirm that's indeed the right device a few ways:




  • cryptsetup luksDump /dev/mapper/vg_root-lv_root ought to work


  • dmsetup table luks-cee2a805-188f-44b6-b577-879243c0eb6c will show the device-mapper mapping table. The second-to-last field should be the major and minor numbers separated by a colon (e.g., yours will probably show 253:0). You can use stat or even ls -l to see the major/minor numbers of devices to see what matches.





share|improve this answer




















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "106"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f488045%2fdevice-name-to-use-in-luks-commands-for-lvm-luks%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    From RedHat blog link you posted, it appears clevis wants the encrypted block device (not the decrypted one). In your lsblk output, that is /dev/mapper/vg_root-lv_root. This sort of makes sense; the decrypted one doesn't exist until after the keys are supplied.



    You can confirm that's indeed the right device a few ways:




    • cryptsetup luksDump /dev/mapper/vg_root-lv_root ought to work


    • dmsetup table luks-cee2a805-188f-44b6-b577-879243c0eb6c will show the device-mapper mapping table. The second-to-last field should be the major and minor numbers separated by a colon (e.g., yours will probably show 253:0). You can use stat or even ls -l to see the major/minor numbers of devices to see what matches.





    share|improve this answer

























      0














      From RedHat blog link you posted, it appears clevis wants the encrypted block device (not the decrypted one). In your lsblk output, that is /dev/mapper/vg_root-lv_root. This sort of makes sense; the decrypted one doesn't exist until after the keys are supplied.



      You can confirm that's indeed the right device a few ways:




      • cryptsetup luksDump /dev/mapper/vg_root-lv_root ought to work


      • dmsetup table luks-cee2a805-188f-44b6-b577-879243c0eb6c will show the device-mapper mapping table. The second-to-last field should be the major and minor numbers separated by a colon (e.g., yours will probably show 253:0). You can use stat or even ls -l to see the major/minor numbers of devices to see what matches.





      share|improve this answer























        0












        0








        0






        From RedHat blog link you posted, it appears clevis wants the encrypted block device (not the decrypted one). In your lsblk output, that is /dev/mapper/vg_root-lv_root. This sort of makes sense; the decrypted one doesn't exist until after the keys are supplied.



        You can confirm that's indeed the right device a few ways:




        • cryptsetup luksDump /dev/mapper/vg_root-lv_root ought to work


        • dmsetup table luks-cee2a805-188f-44b6-b577-879243c0eb6c will show the device-mapper mapping table. The second-to-last field should be the major and minor numbers separated by a colon (e.g., yours will probably show 253:0). You can use stat or even ls -l to see the major/minor numbers of devices to see what matches.





        share|improve this answer












        From RedHat blog link you posted, it appears clevis wants the encrypted block device (not the decrypted one). In your lsblk output, that is /dev/mapper/vg_root-lv_root. This sort of makes sense; the decrypted one doesn't exist until after the keys are supplied.



        You can confirm that's indeed the right device a few ways:




        • cryptsetup luksDump /dev/mapper/vg_root-lv_root ought to work


        • dmsetup table luks-cee2a805-188f-44b6-b577-879243c0eb6c will show the device-mapper mapping table. The second-to-last field should be the major and minor numbers separated by a colon (e.g., yours will probably show 253:0). You can use stat or even ls -l to see the major/minor numbers of devices to see what matches.






        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Dec 14 at 19:53









        derobert

        71.8k8152210




        71.8k8152210



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f488045%2fdevice-name-to-use-in-luks-commands-for-lvm-luks%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown






            Popular posts from this blog

            Peggy Mitchell

            Palaiologos

            The Forum (Inglewood, California)