Mount HTTP Server As File System

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












8














I have a machine on which I wish to mount multiple remote servers to access them all centrally. For remote Linux based systems I am using SSHFS which works fine. But for Windows systems, or systems without SSH, they all have some form of HTTP server installed sharing the files (so they all have directory browsing enabled).



Can I mount a HTTP server as a local file system like SSHFS, so I can have all these remote servers mounted locally and presented in a uniform manner?










share|improve this question

















  • 1




    Someone out there might have written a tool to simulate this but I doubt it. The way that HTTP servers typically present the information is not very conducive to it.
    – goldilocks
    Mar 11 '13 at 14:54










  • As above. Also the HTTP browsing is just that - it browses and reads, doesn't support uploading. I would look at either sharing the folder(s) to mount either via SMB/CIFS or FTP. Alternatively look at WebDAV and I'm sure you can find a IIS implementation.
    – Dave C
    Mar 11 '13 at 15:15






  • 2




    @goldilocks someone out there made it a standard well over 10 years ago.
    – jordanm
    Mar 11 '13 at 15:21










  • Live and learn. :)
    – goldilocks
    Mar 11 '13 at 15:28






  • 1




    @DaveC Well typically directory browsing doesn't support uploading, however I failed to mention that I wanted read only access. Although HTTP it's self does support uploading with the PUT method.
    – jwbensley
    Mar 11 '13 at 20:07















8














I have a machine on which I wish to mount multiple remote servers to access them all centrally. For remote Linux based systems I am using SSHFS which works fine. But for Windows systems, or systems without SSH, they all have some form of HTTP server installed sharing the files (so they all have directory browsing enabled).



Can I mount a HTTP server as a local file system like SSHFS, so I can have all these remote servers mounted locally and presented in a uniform manner?










share|improve this question

















  • 1




    Someone out there might have written a tool to simulate this but I doubt it. The way that HTTP servers typically present the information is not very conducive to it.
    – goldilocks
    Mar 11 '13 at 14:54










  • As above. Also the HTTP browsing is just that - it browses and reads, doesn't support uploading. I would look at either sharing the folder(s) to mount either via SMB/CIFS or FTP. Alternatively look at WebDAV and I'm sure you can find a IIS implementation.
    – Dave C
    Mar 11 '13 at 15:15






  • 2




    @goldilocks someone out there made it a standard well over 10 years ago.
    – jordanm
    Mar 11 '13 at 15:21










  • Live and learn. :)
    – goldilocks
    Mar 11 '13 at 15:28






  • 1




    @DaveC Well typically directory browsing doesn't support uploading, however I failed to mention that I wanted read only access. Although HTTP it's self does support uploading with the PUT method.
    – jwbensley
    Mar 11 '13 at 20:07













8












8








8


1





I have a machine on which I wish to mount multiple remote servers to access them all centrally. For remote Linux based systems I am using SSHFS which works fine. But for Windows systems, or systems without SSH, they all have some form of HTTP server installed sharing the files (so they all have directory browsing enabled).



Can I mount a HTTP server as a local file system like SSHFS, so I can have all these remote servers mounted locally and presented in a uniform manner?










share|improve this question













I have a machine on which I wish to mount multiple remote servers to access them all centrally. For remote Linux based systems I am using SSHFS which works fine. But for Windows systems, or systems without SSH, they all have some form of HTTP server installed sharing the files (so they all have directory browsing enabled).



Can I mount a HTTP server as a local file system like SSHFS, so I can have all these remote servers mounted locally and presented in a uniform manner?







filesystems mount remote http






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Mar 11 '13 at 14:48









jwbensley

2,342103039




2,342103039







  • 1




    Someone out there might have written a tool to simulate this but I doubt it. The way that HTTP servers typically present the information is not very conducive to it.
    – goldilocks
    Mar 11 '13 at 14:54










  • As above. Also the HTTP browsing is just that - it browses and reads, doesn't support uploading. I would look at either sharing the folder(s) to mount either via SMB/CIFS or FTP. Alternatively look at WebDAV and I'm sure you can find a IIS implementation.
    – Dave C
    Mar 11 '13 at 15:15






  • 2




    @goldilocks someone out there made it a standard well over 10 years ago.
    – jordanm
    Mar 11 '13 at 15:21










  • Live and learn. :)
    – goldilocks
    Mar 11 '13 at 15:28






  • 1




    @DaveC Well typically directory browsing doesn't support uploading, however I failed to mention that I wanted read only access. Although HTTP it's self does support uploading with the PUT method.
    – jwbensley
    Mar 11 '13 at 20:07












  • 1




    Someone out there might have written a tool to simulate this but I doubt it. The way that HTTP servers typically present the information is not very conducive to it.
    – goldilocks
    Mar 11 '13 at 14:54










  • As above. Also the HTTP browsing is just that - it browses and reads, doesn't support uploading. I would look at either sharing the folder(s) to mount either via SMB/CIFS or FTP. Alternatively look at WebDAV and I'm sure you can find a IIS implementation.
    – Dave C
    Mar 11 '13 at 15:15






  • 2




    @goldilocks someone out there made it a standard well over 10 years ago.
    – jordanm
    Mar 11 '13 at 15:21










  • Live and learn. :)
    – goldilocks
    Mar 11 '13 at 15:28






  • 1




    @DaveC Well typically directory browsing doesn't support uploading, however I failed to mention that I wanted read only access. Although HTTP it's self does support uploading with the PUT method.
    – jwbensley
    Mar 11 '13 at 20:07







1




1




Someone out there might have written a tool to simulate this but I doubt it. The way that HTTP servers typically present the information is not very conducive to it.
– goldilocks
Mar 11 '13 at 14:54




Someone out there might have written a tool to simulate this but I doubt it. The way that HTTP servers typically present the information is not very conducive to it.
– goldilocks
Mar 11 '13 at 14:54












As above. Also the HTTP browsing is just that - it browses and reads, doesn't support uploading. I would look at either sharing the folder(s) to mount either via SMB/CIFS or FTP. Alternatively look at WebDAV and I'm sure you can find a IIS implementation.
– Dave C
Mar 11 '13 at 15:15




As above. Also the HTTP browsing is just that - it browses and reads, doesn't support uploading. I would look at either sharing the folder(s) to mount either via SMB/CIFS or FTP. Alternatively look at WebDAV and I'm sure you can find a IIS implementation.
– Dave C
Mar 11 '13 at 15:15




2




2




@goldilocks someone out there made it a standard well over 10 years ago.
– jordanm
Mar 11 '13 at 15:21




@goldilocks someone out there made it a standard well over 10 years ago.
– jordanm
Mar 11 '13 at 15:21












Live and learn. :)
– goldilocks
Mar 11 '13 at 15:28




Live and learn. :)
– goldilocks
Mar 11 '13 at 15:28




1




1




@DaveC Well typically directory browsing doesn't support uploading, however I failed to mention that I wanted read only access. Although HTTP it's self does support uploading with the PUT method.
– jwbensley
Mar 11 '13 at 20:07




@DaveC Well typically directory browsing doesn't support uploading, however I failed to mention that I wanted read only access. Although HTTP it's self does support uploading with the PUT method.
– jwbensley
Mar 11 '13 at 20:07










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















8














You can do this using WebDAV. This is an HTTP extension that is supported by most web servers, including IIS and Apache. WebDAV can be mounted in linux via the davfs2 FUSE module.






share|improve this answer
















  • 1




    davfs2... or fusedav or avfs or gvfs (Gnome/Nautilus) at least.
    – Stéphane Chazelas
    Mar 11 '13 at 20:11


















5














The problem with plain HTTP is that its just for retrieving content. There's no concept of folder or file list.



Some web servers let you browse directory structures by generating nice HTML pages with links to files for directories. And at least things like lftp are able to parse some of the common formats those indexes are generated as and give you the impression that it is a file transfer protocol, but it's not really, and I don't know of any fuse file systems that can parse indexes the way lftp does.



DAV is an extension that just does that and is already covered by jordanm's answer.



But note that if you don't need to list directories, avfs at least can let you access web pages over the filesystem.



$ mkdir AVFS
$ avfsd AVFS
$ grep -w Reputation 'AVFS/#http:unix.stackexchange.com|users|12583|javano'
<span class="count">731</span> Reputation


Now also note that you can install sshd (via cygwin) or a FTP or Apache with DAV on a Windows machine as well, so you should be able to do the same things as you do on Unix machines.






share|improve this answer




















  • wouldn't the path portion of an HTTP URL be considered as corresponding to a directory structure under the root? also, many web servers offer a file listing if you request a URL ending with a directory, not a file. and then both of these two concepts could be translated into this model of mounting an HTTP server as a file system. now, as far as posting changes to such a mount, I am not sure about that but perhaps some web servers could be configured to do it much like FTP
    – amphibient
    Mar 11 '13 at 21:37










  • @amphibient, yes, what you call a file listing is what I call a generated HTML page with links to file. It still needs to be parsed and there's no standard on the format of those pages. On Apache alone there are several modules generating those indexes which can be tuned in many different ways. So there's no foolproof solution. As I said see lftp that tries to parse many of those listing pages.
    – Stéphane Chazelas
    Mar 11 '13 at 21:44


















1














the main issue already covered above is: directory/tree listing.



Although your question is quite old and you might have done otherwise, I have recently written a fuse filesystem that does exactly what you need, provided you write a little script to give it the "tree" of URLs.



It is there : https://gitlab.com/BylonAkila/astreamfs



You have an example script for the provider 1fichier, which you can adapt to your own personal server. What the script does is only prepare all the arguments for astreamfs, so that the mount will show all your files and folders in the right place. It does so with the (in)famous "web scraping" technique, aka reading HTML pages and extracting relevant parts from that.



There are still two major constaints, obviously, compared to regular mounts like NFS or SSHFS:



  • The http server needs to handle 'ranges' (most servers can do that)

  • It is read-only!





share|improve this answer




















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "106"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f67568%2fmount-http-server-as-file-system%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    8














    You can do this using WebDAV. This is an HTTP extension that is supported by most web servers, including IIS and Apache. WebDAV can be mounted in linux via the davfs2 FUSE module.






    share|improve this answer
















    • 1




      davfs2... or fusedav or avfs or gvfs (Gnome/Nautilus) at least.
      – Stéphane Chazelas
      Mar 11 '13 at 20:11















    8














    You can do this using WebDAV. This is an HTTP extension that is supported by most web servers, including IIS and Apache. WebDAV can be mounted in linux via the davfs2 FUSE module.






    share|improve this answer
















    • 1




      davfs2... or fusedav or avfs or gvfs (Gnome/Nautilus) at least.
      – Stéphane Chazelas
      Mar 11 '13 at 20:11













    8












    8








    8






    You can do this using WebDAV. This is an HTTP extension that is supported by most web servers, including IIS and Apache. WebDAV can be mounted in linux via the davfs2 FUSE module.






    share|improve this answer












    You can do this using WebDAV. This is an HTTP extension that is supported by most web servers, including IIS and Apache. WebDAV can be mounted in linux via the davfs2 FUSE module.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Mar 11 '13 at 15:20









    jordanm

    30.2k28292




    30.2k28292







    • 1




      davfs2... or fusedav or avfs or gvfs (Gnome/Nautilus) at least.
      – Stéphane Chazelas
      Mar 11 '13 at 20:11












    • 1




      davfs2... or fusedav or avfs or gvfs (Gnome/Nautilus) at least.
      – Stéphane Chazelas
      Mar 11 '13 at 20:11







    1




    1




    davfs2... or fusedav or avfs or gvfs (Gnome/Nautilus) at least.
    – Stéphane Chazelas
    Mar 11 '13 at 20:11




    davfs2... or fusedav or avfs or gvfs (Gnome/Nautilus) at least.
    – Stéphane Chazelas
    Mar 11 '13 at 20:11













    5














    The problem with plain HTTP is that its just for retrieving content. There's no concept of folder or file list.



    Some web servers let you browse directory structures by generating nice HTML pages with links to files for directories. And at least things like lftp are able to parse some of the common formats those indexes are generated as and give you the impression that it is a file transfer protocol, but it's not really, and I don't know of any fuse file systems that can parse indexes the way lftp does.



    DAV is an extension that just does that and is already covered by jordanm's answer.



    But note that if you don't need to list directories, avfs at least can let you access web pages over the filesystem.



    $ mkdir AVFS
    $ avfsd AVFS
    $ grep -w Reputation 'AVFS/#http:unix.stackexchange.com|users|12583|javano'
    <span class="count">731</span> Reputation


    Now also note that you can install sshd (via cygwin) or a FTP or Apache with DAV on a Windows machine as well, so you should be able to do the same things as you do on Unix machines.






    share|improve this answer




















    • wouldn't the path portion of an HTTP URL be considered as corresponding to a directory structure under the root? also, many web servers offer a file listing if you request a URL ending with a directory, not a file. and then both of these two concepts could be translated into this model of mounting an HTTP server as a file system. now, as far as posting changes to such a mount, I am not sure about that but perhaps some web servers could be configured to do it much like FTP
      – amphibient
      Mar 11 '13 at 21:37










    • @amphibient, yes, what you call a file listing is what I call a generated HTML page with links to file. It still needs to be parsed and there's no standard on the format of those pages. On Apache alone there are several modules generating those indexes which can be tuned in many different ways. So there's no foolproof solution. As I said see lftp that tries to parse many of those listing pages.
      – Stéphane Chazelas
      Mar 11 '13 at 21:44















    5














    The problem with plain HTTP is that its just for retrieving content. There's no concept of folder or file list.



    Some web servers let you browse directory structures by generating nice HTML pages with links to files for directories. And at least things like lftp are able to parse some of the common formats those indexes are generated as and give you the impression that it is a file transfer protocol, but it's not really, and I don't know of any fuse file systems that can parse indexes the way lftp does.



    DAV is an extension that just does that and is already covered by jordanm's answer.



    But note that if you don't need to list directories, avfs at least can let you access web pages over the filesystem.



    $ mkdir AVFS
    $ avfsd AVFS
    $ grep -w Reputation 'AVFS/#http:unix.stackexchange.com|users|12583|javano'
    <span class="count">731</span> Reputation


    Now also note that you can install sshd (via cygwin) or a FTP or Apache with DAV on a Windows machine as well, so you should be able to do the same things as you do on Unix machines.






    share|improve this answer




















    • wouldn't the path portion of an HTTP URL be considered as corresponding to a directory structure under the root? also, many web servers offer a file listing if you request a URL ending with a directory, not a file. and then both of these two concepts could be translated into this model of mounting an HTTP server as a file system. now, as far as posting changes to such a mount, I am not sure about that but perhaps some web servers could be configured to do it much like FTP
      – amphibient
      Mar 11 '13 at 21:37










    • @amphibient, yes, what you call a file listing is what I call a generated HTML page with links to file. It still needs to be parsed and there's no standard on the format of those pages. On Apache alone there are several modules generating those indexes which can be tuned in many different ways. So there's no foolproof solution. As I said see lftp that tries to parse many of those listing pages.
      – Stéphane Chazelas
      Mar 11 '13 at 21:44













    5












    5








    5






    The problem with plain HTTP is that its just for retrieving content. There's no concept of folder or file list.



    Some web servers let you browse directory structures by generating nice HTML pages with links to files for directories. And at least things like lftp are able to parse some of the common formats those indexes are generated as and give you the impression that it is a file transfer protocol, but it's not really, and I don't know of any fuse file systems that can parse indexes the way lftp does.



    DAV is an extension that just does that and is already covered by jordanm's answer.



    But note that if you don't need to list directories, avfs at least can let you access web pages over the filesystem.



    $ mkdir AVFS
    $ avfsd AVFS
    $ grep -w Reputation 'AVFS/#http:unix.stackexchange.com|users|12583|javano'
    <span class="count">731</span> Reputation


    Now also note that you can install sshd (via cygwin) or a FTP or Apache with DAV on a Windows machine as well, so you should be able to do the same things as you do on Unix machines.






    share|improve this answer












    The problem with plain HTTP is that its just for retrieving content. There's no concept of folder or file list.



    Some web servers let you browse directory structures by generating nice HTML pages with links to files for directories. And at least things like lftp are able to parse some of the common formats those indexes are generated as and give you the impression that it is a file transfer protocol, but it's not really, and I don't know of any fuse file systems that can parse indexes the way lftp does.



    DAV is an extension that just does that and is already covered by jordanm's answer.



    But note that if you don't need to list directories, avfs at least can let you access web pages over the filesystem.



    $ mkdir AVFS
    $ avfsd AVFS
    $ grep -w Reputation 'AVFS/#http:unix.stackexchange.com|users|12583|javano'
    <span class="count">731</span> Reputation


    Now also note that you can install sshd (via cygwin) or a FTP or Apache with DAV on a Windows machine as well, so you should be able to do the same things as you do on Unix machines.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Mar 11 '13 at 20:30









    Stéphane Chazelas

    299k54563913




    299k54563913











    • wouldn't the path portion of an HTTP URL be considered as corresponding to a directory structure under the root? also, many web servers offer a file listing if you request a URL ending with a directory, not a file. and then both of these two concepts could be translated into this model of mounting an HTTP server as a file system. now, as far as posting changes to such a mount, I am not sure about that but perhaps some web servers could be configured to do it much like FTP
      – amphibient
      Mar 11 '13 at 21:37










    • @amphibient, yes, what you call a file listing is what I call a generated HTML page with links to file. It still needs to be parsed and there's no standard on the format of those pages. On Apache alone there are several modules generating those indexes which can be tuned in many different ways. So there's no foolproof solution. As I said see lftp that tries to parse many of those listing pages.
      – Stéphane Chazelas
      Mar 11 '13 at 21:44
















    • wouldn't the path portion of an HTTP URL be considered as corresponding to a directory structure under the root? also, many web servers offer a file listing if you request a URL ending with a directory, not a file. and then both of these two concepts could be translated into this model of mounting an HTTP server as a file system. now, as far as posting changes to such a mount, I am not sure about that but perhaps some web servers could be configured to do it much like FTP
      – amphibient
      Mar 11 '13 at 21:37










    • @amphibient, yes, what you call a file listing is what I call a generated HTML page with links to file. It still needs to be parsed and there's no standard on the format of those pages. On Apache alone there are several modules generating those indexes which can be tuned in many different ways. So there's no foolproof solution. As I said see lftp that tries to parse many of those listing pages.
      – Stéphane Chazelas
      Mar 11 '13 at 21:44















    wouldn't the path portion of an HTTP URL be considered as corresponding to a directory structure under the root? also, many web servers offer a file listing if you request a URL ending with a directory, not a file. and then both of these two concepts could be translated into this model of mounting an HTTP server as a file system. now, as far as posting changes to such a mount, I am not sure about that but perhaps some web servers could be configured to do it much like FTP
    – amphibient
    Mar 11 '13 at 21:37




    wouldn't the path portion of an HTTP URL be considered as corresponding to a directory structure under the root? also, many web servers offer a file listing if you request a URL ending with a directory, not a file. and then both of these two concepts could be translated into this model of mounting an HTTP server as a file system. now, as far as posting changes to such a mount, I am not sure about that but perhaps some web servers could be configured to do it much like FTP
    – amphibient
    Mar 11 '13 at 21:37












    @amphibient, yes, what you call a file listing is what I call a generated HTML page with links to file. It still needs to be parsed and there's no standard on the format of those pages. On Apache alone there are several modules generating those indexes which can be tuned in many different ways. So there's no foolproof solution. As I said see lftp that tries to parse many of those listing pages.
    – Stéphane Chazelas
    Mar 11 '13 at 21:44




    @amphibient, yes, what you call a file listing is what I call a generated HTML page with links to file. It still needs to be parsed and there's no standard on the format of those pages. On Apache alone there are several modules generating those indexes which can be tuned in many different ways. So there's no foolproof solution. As I said see lftp that tries to parse many of those listing pages.
    – Stéphane Chazelas
    Mar 11 '13 at 21:44











    1














    the main issue already covered above is: directory/tree listing.



    Although your question is quite old and you might have done otherwise, I have recently written a fuse filesystem that does exactly what you need, provided you write a little script to give it the "tree" of URLs.



    It is there : https://gitlab.com/BylonAkila/astreamfs



    You have an example script for the provider 1fichier, which you can adapt to your own personal server. What the script does is only prepare all the arguments for astreamfs, so that the mount will show all your files and folders in the right place. It does so with the (in)famous "web scraping" technique, aka reading HTML pages and extracting relevant parts from that.



    There are still two major constaints, obviously, compared to regular mounts like NFS or SSHFS:



    • The http server needs to handle 'ranges' (most servers can do that)

    • It is read-only!





    share|improve this answer

























      1














      the main issue already covered above is: directory/tree listing.



      Although your question is quite old and you might have done otherwise, I have recently written a fuse filesystem that does exactly what you need, provided you write a little script to give it the "tree" of URLs.



      It is there : https://gitlab.com/BylonAkila/astreamfs



      You have an example script for the provider 1fichier, which you can adapt to your own personal server. What the script does is only prepare all the arguments for astreamfs, so that the mount will show all your files and folders in the right place. It does so with the (in)famous "web scraping" technique, aka reading HTML pages and extracting relevant parts from that.



      There are still two major constaints, obviously, compared to regular mounts like NFS or SSHFS:



      • The http server needs to handle 'ranges' (most servers can do that)

      • It is read-only!





      share|improve this answer























        1












        1








        1






        the main issue already covered above is: directory/tree listing.



        Although your question is quite old and you might have done otherwise, I have recently written a fuse filesystem that does exactly what you need, provided you write a little script to give it the "tree" of URLs.



        It is there : https://gitlab.com/BylonAkila/astreamfs



        You have an example script for the provider 1fichier, which you can adapt to your own personal server. What the script does is only prepare all the arguments for astreamfs, so that the mount will show all your files and folders in the right place. It does so with the (in)famous "web scraping" technique, aka reading HTML pages and extracting relevant parts from that.



        There are still two major constaints, obviously, compared to regular mounts like NFS or SSHFS:



        • The http server needs to handle 'ranges' (most servers can do that)

        • It is read-only!





        share|improve this answer












        the main issue already covered above is: directory/tree listing.



        Although your question is quite old and you might have done otherwise, I have recently written a fuse filesystem that does exactly what you need, provided you write a little script to give it the "tree" of URLs.



        It is there : https://gitlab.com/BylonAkila/astreamfs



        You have an example script for the provider 1fichier, which you can adapt to your own personal server. What the script does is only prepare all the arguments for astreamfs, so that the mount will show all your files and folders in the right place. It does so with the (in)famous "web scraping" technique, aka reading HTML pages and extracting relevant parts from that.



        There are still two major constaints, obviously, compared to regular mounts like NFS or SSHFS:



        • The http server needs to handle 'ranges' (most servers can do that)

        • It is read-only!






        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Dec 14 at 21:28









        Bylon

        112




        112



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f67568%2fmount-http-server-as-file-system%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown






            Popular posts from this blog

            How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

            Bahrain

            Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay