Noetherian spectral space comes from noetherian ring?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
8
down vote
favorite
Let $X$ be a spectral space (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spectral_space), i.e. a space of the form $textrmSpec(A)$ for some commutative ring $A$. If $X$ is noetherian, does there also exist a noetherian ring $B$ such that $X=textrmSpec(B)$?
ag.algebraic-geometry ac.commutative-algebra gn.general-topology
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
favorite
Let $X$ be a spectral space (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spectral_space), i.e. a space of the form $textrmSpec(A)$ for some commutative ring $A$. If $X$ is noetherian, does there also exist a noetherian ring $B$ such that $X=textrmSpec(B)$?
ag.algebraic-geometry ac.commutative-algebra gn.general-topology
1
$mathrmSpec$ is an (anti-)equivalence from commutative rings to affine scheme, so two rings are isomorphic iff their Spec's are. So, if such a noetherian $B$ exists, your $A$ was already isomorphic to it.
– Qfwfq
7 hours ago
1
Oh yes, you're totally right, it's the underlying top space of the Spec not the scheme
– Qfwfq
7 hours ago
5
I wonder if Hochster's thesis addresses this? Off the top of my head, I don't know how to make the following Noetherian topological space $p,q,r$, with open sets $ p,q,r, p,q, p $, as the spectrum of a Noetherian ring (it's the spectrum of the non-discrete valuation ring associated to $mathbbZ times mathbbZ$ with the lex order).
– Karl Schwede
6 hours ago
@KarlSchwede - You may want to take look at my comment below.
– Pierre-Yves Gaillard
5 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
favorite
up vote
8
down vote
favorite
Let $X$ be a spectral space (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spectral_space), i.e. a space of the form $textrmSpec(A)$ for some commutative ring $A$. If $X$ is noetherian, does there also exist a noetherian ring $B$ such that $X=textrmSpec(B)$?
ag.algebraic-geometry ac.commutative-algebra gn.general-topology
Let $X$ be a spectral space (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spectral_space), i.e. a space of the form $textrmSpec(A)$ for some commutative ring $A$. If $X$ is noetherian, does there also exist a noetherian ring $B$ such that $X=textrmSpec(B)$?
ag.algebraic-geometry ac.commutative-algebra gn.general-topology
ag.algebraic-geometry ac.commutative-algebra gn.general-topology
edited 7 hours ago
მამუკა ჯიბლაძე
7,715242110
7,715242110
asked 7 hours ago
Hans
807411
807411
1
$mathrmSpec$ is an (anti-)equivalence from commutative rings to affine scheme, so two rings are isomorphic iff their Spec's are. So, if such a noetherian $B$ exists, your $A$ was already isomorphic to it.
– Qfwfq
7 hours ago
1
Oh yes, you're totally right, it's the underlying top space of the Spec not the scheme
– Qfwfq
7 hours ago
5
I wonder if Hochster's thesis addresses this? Off the top of my head, I don't know how to make the following Noetherian topological space $p,q,r$, with open sets $ p,q,r, p,q, p $, as the spectrum of a Noetherian ring (it's the spectrum of the non-discrete valuation ring associated to $mathbbZ times mathbbZ$ with the lex order).
– Karl Schwede
6 hours ago
@KarlSchwede - You may want to take look at my comment below.
– Pierre-Yves Gaillard
5 hours ago
add a comment |
1
$mathrmSpec$ is an (anti-)equivalence from commutative rings to affine scheme, so two rings are isomorphic iff their Spec's are. So, if such a noetherian $B$ exists, your $A$ was already isomorphic to it.
– Qfwfq
7 hours ago
1
Oh yes, you're totally right, it's the underlying top space of the Spec not the scheme
– Qfwfq
7 hours ago
5
I wonder if Hochster's thesis addresses this? Off the top of my head, I don't know how to make the following Noetherian topological space $p,q,r$, with open sets $ p,q,r, p,q, p $, as the spectrum of a Noetherian ring (it's the spectrum of the non-discrete valuation ring associated to $mathbbZ times mathbbZ$ with the lex order).
– Karl Schwede
6 hours ago
@KarlSchwede - You may want to take look at my comment below.
– Pierre-Yves Gaillard
5 hours ago
1
1
$mathrmSpec$ is an (anti-)equivalence from commutative rings to affine scheme, so two rings are isomorphic iff their Spec's are. So, if such a noetherian $B$ exists, your $A$ was already isomorphic to it.
– Qfwfq
7 hours ago
$mathrmSpec$ is an (anti-)equivalence from commutative rings to affine scheme, so two rings are isomorphic iff their Spec's are. So, if such a noetherian $B$ exists, your $A$ was already isomorphic to it.
– Qfwfq
7 hours ago
1
1
Oh yes, you're totally right, it's the underlying top space of the Spec not the scheme
– Qfwfq
7 hours ago
Oh yes, you're totally right, it's the underlying top space of the Spec not the scheme
– Qfwfq
7 hours ago
5
5
I wonder if Hochster's thesis addresses this? Off the top of my head, I don't know how to make the following Noetherian topological space $p,q,r$, with open sets $ p,q,r, p,q, p $, as the spectrum of a Noetherian ring (it's the spectrum of the non-discrete valuation ring associated to $mathbbZ times mathbbZ$ with the lex order).
– Karl Schwede
6 hours ago
I wonder if Hochster's thesis addresses this? Off the top of my head, I don't know how to make the following Noetherian topological space $p,q,r$, with open sets $ p,q,r, p,q, p $, as the spectrum of a Noetherian ring (it's the spectrum of the non-discrete valuation ring associated to $mathbbZ times mathbbZ$ with the lex order).
– Karl Schwede
6 hours ago
@KarlSchwede - You may want to take look at my comment below.
– Pierre-Yves Gaillard
5 hours ago
@KarlSchwede - You may want to take look at my comment below.
– Pierre-Yves Gaillard
5 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
5
down vote
accepted
Graph $N_5$ with poset order topology (i.e. poset $M=p,q,r, P_2=p,q, P_1=p, Q=r, N=phi$) is not Spec($A$) for Noetherian $A$ because if $a in Q-P_2$ then 1 = dim$(A/a)$ = dim$(A)-1$ = 2 by the principal ideal theorem.
5
See also top of p. 48 in Ring constructions on spectral spaces by Christopher Francis Tedd escholar.manchester.ac.uk/jrul/item/?pid=uk-ac-man-scw:307012 --- link to the PDF file: escholar.manchester.ac.uk/api/…
– Pierre-Yves Gaillard
5 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
5
down vote
accepted
Graph $N_5$ with poset order topology (i.e. poset $M=p,q,r, P_2=p,q, P_1=p, Q=r, N=phi$) is not Spec($A$) for Noetherian $A$ because if $a in Q-P_2$ then 1 = dim$(A/a)$ = dim$(A)-1$ = 2 by the principal ideal theorem.
5
See also top of p. 48 in Ring constructions on spectral spaces by Christopher Francis Tedd escholar.manchester.ac.uk/jrul/item/?pid=uk-ac-man-scw:307012 --- link to the PDF file: escholar.manchester.ac.uk/api/…
– Pierre-Yves Gaillard
5 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
accepted
Graph $N_5$ with poset order topology (i.e. poset $M=p,q,r, P_2=p,q, P_1=p, Q=r, N=phi$) is not Spec($A$) for Noetherian $A$ because if $a in Q-P_2$ then 1 = dim$(A/a)$ = dim$(A)-1$ = 2 by the principal ideal theorem.
5
See also top of p. 48 in Ring constructions on spectral spaces by Christopher Francis Tedd escholar.manchester.ac.uk/jrul/item/?pid=uk-ac-man-scw:307012 --- link to the PDF file: escholar.manchester.ac.uk/api/…
– Pierre-Yves Gaillard
5 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
accepted
up vote
5
down vote
accepted
Graph $N_5$ with poset order topology (i.e. poset $M=p,q,r, P_2=p,q, P_1=p, Q=r, N=phi$) is not Spec($A$) for Noetherian $A$ because if $a in Q-P_2$ then 1 = dim$(A/a)$ = dim$(A)-1$ = 2 by the principal ideal theorem.
Graph $N_5$ with poset order topology (i.e. poset $M=p,q,r, P_2=p,q, P_1=p, Q=r, N=phi$) is not Spec($A$) for Noetherian $A$ because if $a in Q-P_2$ then 1 = dim$(A/a)$ = dim$(A)-1$ = 2 by the principal ideal theorem.
answered 5 hours ago
David Lampert
1,654169
1,654169
5
See also top of p. 48 in Ring constructions on spectral spaces by Christopher Francis Tedd escholar.manchester.ac.uk/jrul/item/?pid=uk-ac-man-scw:307012 --- link to the PDF file: escholar.manchester.ac.uk/api/…
– Pierre-Yves Gaillard
5 hours ago
add a comment |
5
See also top of p. 48 in Ring constructions on spectral spaces by Christopher Francis Tedd escholar.manchester.ac.uk/jrul/item/?pid=uk-ac-man-scw:307012 --- link to the PDF file: escholar.manchester.ac.uk/api/…
– Pierre-Yves Gaillard
5 hours ago
5
5
See also top of p. 48 in Ring constructions on spectral spaces by Christopher Francis Tedd escholar.manchester.ac.uk/jrul/item/?pid=uk-ac-man-scw:307012 --- link to the PDF file: escholar.manchester.ac.uk/api/…
– Pierre-Yves Gaillard
5 hours ago
See also top of p. 48 in Ring constructions on spectral spaces by Christopher Francis Tedd escholar.manchester.ac.uk/jrul/item/?pid=uk-ac-man-scw:307012 --- link to the PDF file: escholar.manchester.ac.uk/api/…
– Pierre-Yves Gaillard
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f315031%2fnoetherian-spectral-space-comes-from-noetherian-ring%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
1
$mathrmSpec$ is an (anti-)equivalence from commutative rings to affine scheme, so two rings are isomorphic iff their Spec's are. So, if such a noetherian $B$ exists, your $A$ was already isomorphic to it.
– Qfwfq
7 hours ago
1
Oh yes, you're totally right, it's the underlying top space of the Spec not the scheme
– Qfwfq
7 hours ago
5
I wonder if Hochster's thesis addresses this? Off the top of my head, I don't know how to make the following Noetherian topological space $p,q,r$, with open sets $ p,q,r, p,q, p $, as the spectrum of a Noetherian ring (it's the spectrum of the non-discrete valuation ring associated to $mathbbZ times mathbbZ$ with the lex order).
– Karl Schwede
6 hours ago
@KarlSchwede - You may want to take look at my comment below.
– Pierre-Yves Gaillard
5 hours ago