How was the Skylab Rescue mission supposed to return 5 astronauts?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
29
down vote
favorite
In addition to the three manned missions, there was a rescue mission on standby that had a crew of two, but could take five back down.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skylab#Manned_missions
How does one fit 5 astronauts in an Apollo command module? This answer suggests a second row of seats for such a flight. But where would the second row be placed? In the lower equipment bay, perhaps?
spacecraft-development skylab
asked Nov 21 at 12:15
Dr Sheldon
3,2931340
add a comment |
up vote
29
down vote
favorite
In addition to the three manned missions, there was a rescue mission on standby that had a crew of two, but could take five back down.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skylab#Manned_missions
How does one fit 5 astronauts in an Apollo command module? This answer suggests a second row of seats for such a flight. But where would the second row be placed? In the lower equipment bay, perhaps?
spacecraft-development skylab
asked Nov 21 at 12:15
Dr Sheldon
3,2931340
add a comment |
up vote
29
down vote
favorite
up vote
29
down vote
favorite
In addition to the three manned missions, there was a rescue mission on standby that had a crew of two, but could take five back down.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skylab#Manned_missions
How does one fit 5 astronauts in an Apollo command module? This answer suggests a second row of seats for such a flight. But where would the second row be placed? In the lower equipment bay, perhaps?
spacecraft-development skylab
asked Nov 21 at 12:15
Dr Sheldon
3,2931340
In addition to the three manned missions, there was a rescue mission on standby that had a crew of two, but could take five back down.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skylab#Manned_missions
How does one fit 5 astronauts in an Apollo command module? This answer suggests a second row of seats for such a flight. But where would the second row be placed? In the lower equipment bay, perhaps?
spacecraft-development skylab
spacecraft-development skylab
asked Nov 21 at 12:15
Dr Sheldon
3,2931340
asked Nov 21 at 12:15
Dr Sheldon
3,2931340
asked Nov 21 at 12:15
Dr Sheldon
3,2931340
asked Nov 21 at 12:15
Dr Sheldon
3,2931340
asked Nov 21 at 12:15
Dr Sheldon
3,2931340
3,2931340
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
39
down vote
accepted
Seats were installed in the lower equipment bay, instead of some of the usual storage lockers. A Skylab rescue mission would take a few days at most, so the usual luxuries for a 2-week Apollo mission (like being able to go to the lower equipment bay for a little personal-hygiene privacy) could be foregone. The extra seats were mounted in the reverse direction from the main crew couches:
The rescue CSM had the usual Apollo service module (although, as with the other Skylab CSMs, the SPS tankage was reduced because it didn't need to make the large lunar-orbital-insertion and Earth-return maneuvers, and additional RCS fuel was carried for redundancy):
answered Nov 21 at 16:01
Russell Borogove
77.7k2250338
2
One point that I always thought was interesting is that the shock absorbers on the upper seats had to be modified to have less travel. Apparently it would have been a rough landing.
– prl
Nov 22 at 18:59
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
39
down vote
accepted
Seats were installed in the lower equipment bay, instead of some of the usual storage lockers. A Skylab rescue mission would take a few days at most, so the usual luxuries for a 2-week Apollo mission (like being able to go to the lower equipment bay for a little personal-hygiene privacy) could be foregone. The extra seats were mounted in the reverse direction from the main crew couches:
The rescue CSM had the usual Apollo service module (although, as with the other Skylab CSMs, the SPS tankage was reduced because it didn't need to make the large lunar-orbital-insertion and Earth-return maneuvers, and additional RCS fuel was carried for redundancy):
answered Nov 21 at 16:01
Russell Borogove
77.7k2250338
2
One point that I always thought was interesting is that the shock absorbers on the upper seats had to be modified to have less travel. Apparently it would have been a rough landing.
– prl
Nov 22 at 18:59
add a comment |
up vote
39
down vote
accepted
Seats were installed in the lower equipment bay, instead of some of the usual storage lockers. A Skylab rescue mission would take a few days at most, so the usual luxuries for a 2-week Apollo mission (like being able to go to the lower equipment bay for a little personal-hygiene privacy) could be foregone. The extra seats were mounted in the reverse direction from the main crew couches:
The rescue CSM had the usual Apollo service module (although, as with the other Skylab CSMs, the SPS tankage was reduced because it didn't need to make the large lunar-orbital-insertion and Earth-return maneuvers, and additional RCS fuel was carried for redundancy):
answered Nov 21 at 16:01
Russell Borogove
77.7k2250338
2
One point that I always thought was interesting is that the shock absorbers on the upper seats had to be modified to have less travel. Apparently it would have been a rough landing.
– prl
Nov 22 at 18:59
add a comment |
up vote
39
down vote
accepted
up vote
39
down vote
accepted
Seats were installed in the lower equipment bay, instead of some of the usual storage lockers. A Skylab rescue mission would take a few days at most, so the usual luxuries for a 2-week Apollo mission (like being able to go to the lower equipment bay for a little personal-hygiene privacy) could be foregone. The extra seats were mounted in the reverse direction from the main crew couches:
The rescue CSM had the usual Apollo service module (although, as with the other Skylab CSMs, the SPS tankage was reduced because it didn't need to make the large lunar-orbital-insertion and Earth-return maneuvers, and additional RCS fuel was carried for redundancy):
answered Nov 21 at 16:01
Russell Borogove
77.7k2250338
Seats were installed in the lower equipment bay, instead of some of the usual storage lockers. A Skylab rescue mission would take a few days at most, so the usual luxuries for a 2-week Apollo mission (like being able to go to the lower equipment bay for a little personal-hygiene privacy) could be foregone. The extra seats were mounted in the reverse direction from the main crew couches:
The rescue CSM had the usual Apollo service module (although, as with the other Skylab CSMs, the SPS tankage was reduced because it didn't need to make the large lunar-orbital-insertion and Earth-return maneuvers, and additional RCS fuel was carried for redundancy):
answered Nov 21 at 16:01
Russell Borogove
77.7k2250338
edited Nov 22 at 8:15
answered Nov 21 at 16:01
Russell Borogove
77.7k2250338
answered Nov 21 at 16:01
Russell Borogove
77.7k2250338
answered Nov 21 at 16:01
Russell Borogove
77.7k2250338
77.7k2250338
2
One point that I always thought was interesting is that the shock absorbers on the upper seats had to be modified to have less travel. Apparently it would have been a rough landing.
– prl
Nov 22 at 18:59
add a comment |
2
One point that I always thought was interesting is that the shock absorbers on the upper seats had to be modified to have less travel. Apparently it would have been a rough landing.
– prl
Nov 22 at 18:59
2
2
One point that I always thought was interesting is that the shock absorbers on the upper seats had to be modified to have less travel. Apparently it would have been a rough landing.
– prl
Nov 22 at 18:59
One point that I always thought was interesting is that the shock absorbers on the upper seats had to be modified to have less travel. Apparently it would have been a rough landing.
– prl
Nov 22 at 18:59
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f32173%2fhow-was-the-skylab-rescue-mission-supposed-to-return-5-astronauts%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown