Cipher suites: same name, different IDs, why?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
3
down vote

favorite












Sorry if I missed with a community to ask.



Recently I stumbled on a fact that the same cipher suite can be designated by two different IDs, and this is not a typo nor single occasion.



For instance:
http://www.thesprawl.org/research/tls-and-ssl-cipher-suites



  • TLS_ECDH_ECDSA_WITH_NULL_SHA is 0x0047 and 0xC001

  • TLS_ECDH_ECDSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA is 0x0048 and 0xC002

  • SSL_RSA_FIPS_WITH_DES_CBC_SHA is 0xFEFE and 0xFFE1

  • SSL_RSA_FIPS_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA is 0xFEFF and 0xFFE0

And few others more, like TLS_ECDH_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA and TLS_ECDH_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA.



So, the question is: why two codes are used to designate the same cipher suite? Is it a marker of legacy (broken?) implementation to distinguish? Or just a merge of two standards? Or something else?






tls ciphersuite







share|improve this question









New contributor




Yury Schkatula is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



















  • TLS fingerprints. 0x0047 0%, 0xc001 0.07%
    – kelalaka
    2 hours ago











  • Only pocketbeat uses 0x0047 and it is belong to Elasticsearch and all your first numbers belongs to them. Here a list from IBM
    – kelalaka
    2 hours ago







  • 1




    It should be noted that all 4 of those examples are deprecated and should not be used
    – Richie Frame
    2 hours ago














up vote
3
down vote

favorite












Sorry if I missed with a community to ask.



Recently I stumbled on a fact that the same cipher suite can be designated by two different IDs, and this is not a typo nor single occasion.



For instance:
http://www.thesprawl.org/research/tls-and-ssl-cipher-suites



  • TLS_ECDH_ECDSA_WITH_NULL_SHA is 0x0047 and 0xC001

  • TLS_ECDH_ECDSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA is 0x0048 and 0xC002

  • SSL_RSA_FIPS_WITH_DES_CBC_SHA is 0xFEFE and 0xFFE1

  • SSL_RSA_FIPS_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA is 0xFEFF and 0xFFE0

And few others more, like TLS_ECDH_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA and TLS_ECDH_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA.



So, the question is: why two codes are used to designate the same cipher suite? Is it a marker of legacy (broken?) implementation to distinguish? Or just a merge of two standards? Or something else?






tls ciphersuite







share|improve this question









New contributor




Yury Schkatula is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



















  • TLS fingerprints. 0x0047 0%, 0xc001 0.07%
    – kelalaka
    2 hours ago











  • Only pocketbeat uses 0x0047 and it is belong to Elasticsearch and all your first numbers belongs to them. Here a list from IBM
    – kelalaka
    2 hours ago







  • 1




    It should be noted that all 4 of those examples are deprecated and should not be used
    – Richie Frame
    2 hours ago












up vote
3
down vote

favorite









up vote
3
down vote

favorite











Sorry if I missed with a community to ask.



Recently I stumbled on a fact that the same cipher suite can be designated by two different IDs, and this is not a typo nor single occasion.



For instance:
http://www.thesprawl.org/research/tls-and-ssl-cipher-suites



  • TLS_ECDH_ECDSA_WITH_NULL_SHA is 0x0047 and 0xC001

  • TLS_ECDH_ECDSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA is 0x0048 and 0xC002

  • SSL_RSA_FIPS_WITH_DES_CBC_SHA is 0xFEFE and 0xFFE1

  • SSL_RSA_FIPS_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA is 0xFEFF and 0xFFE0

And few others more, like TLS_ECDH_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA and TLS_ECDH_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA.



So, the question is: why two codes are used to designate the same cipher suite? Is it a marker of legacy (broken?) implementation to distinguish? Or just a merge of two standards? Or something else?






tls ciphersuite







share|improve this question









New contributor




Yury Schkatula is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











Sorry if I missed with a community to ask.



Recently I stumbled on a fact that the same cipher suite can be designated by two different IDs, and this is not a typo nor single occasion.



For instance:
http://www.thesprawl.org/research/tls-and-ssl-cipher-suites



  • TLS_ECDH_ECDSA_WITH_NULL_SHA is 0x0047 and 0xC001

  • TLS_ECDH_ECDSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA is 0x0048 and 0xC002

  • SSL_RSA_FIPS_WITH_DES_CBC_SHA is 0xFEFE and 0xFFE1

  • SSL_RSA_FIPS_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA is 0xFEFF and 0xFFE0

And few others more, like TLS_ECDH_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA and TLS_ECDH_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA.



So, the question is: why two codes are used to designate the same cipher suite? Is it a marker of legacy (broken?) implementation to distinguish? Or just a merge of two standards? Or something else?






tls ciphersuite




tls ciphersuite






share|improve this question









New contributor




Yury Schkatula is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Yury Schkatula is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 3 hours ago









kelalaka

2,199522




2,199522






New contributor




Yury Schkatula is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 4 hours ago









Yury Schkatula

1163




1163




New contributor




Yury Schkatula is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Yury Schkatula is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Yury Schkatula is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • TLS fingerprints. 0x0047 0%, 0xc001 0.07%
    – kelalaka
    2 hours ago











  • Only pocketbeat uses 0x0047 and it is belong to Elasticsearch and all your first numbers belongs to them. Here a list from IBM
    – kelalaka
    2 hours ago







  • 1




    It should be noted that all 4 of those examples are deprecated and should not be used
    – Richie Frame
    2 hours ago
















  • TLS fingerprints. 0x0047 0%, 0xc001 0.07%
    – kelalaka
    2 hours ago











  • Only pocketbeat uses 0x0047 and it is belong to Elasticsearch and all your first numbers belongs to them. Here a list from IBM
    – kelalaka
    2 hours ago







  • 1




    It should be noted that all 4 of those examples are deprecated and should not be used
    – Richie Frame
    2 hours ago















TLS fingerprints. 0x0047 0%, 0xc001 0.07%
– kelalaka
2 hours ago





TLS fingerprints. 0x0047 0%, 0xc001 0.07%
– kelalaka
2 hours ago













Only pocketbeat uses 0x0047 and it is belong to Elasticsearch and all your first numbers belongs to them. Here a list from IBM
– kelalaka
2 hours ago





Only pocketbeat uses 0x0047 and it is belong to Elasticsearch and all your first numbers belongs to them. Here a list from IBM
– kelalaka
2 hours ago





1




1




It should be noted that all 4 of those examples are deprecated and should not be used
– Richie Frame
2 hours ago




It should be noted that all 4 of those examples are deprecated and should not be used
– Richie Frame
2 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote













These numbers belong to ElasticSeach;



  • TLS_ECDH_ECDSA_WITH_NULL_SHA is 0x0047

  • TLS_ECDH_ECDSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA is 0x0048

  • SSL_RSA_FIPS_WITH_DES_CBC_SHA is 0xFEFE

  • SSL_RSA_FIPS_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA is 0xFEFF

and 0x0047 has almost 0% at tlsfingerprint.io



The second numbers (0xC001,0xC001,0xFFE1,0xFFE0) belong to SSL V2.



The implementations can have different control by the maintainers, therefore it is good to have different numbers. It is bad that your original source doesn't list where they took the numbers.






share|improve this answer




















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "281"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    Yury Schkatula is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcrypto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f63635%2fcipher-suites-same-name-different-ids-why%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest

















    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    3
    down vote













    These numbers belong to ElasticSeach;



    • TLS_ECDH_ECDSA_WITH_NULL_SHA is 0x0047

    • TLS_ECDH_ECDSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA is 0x0048

    • SSL_RSA_FIPS_WITH_DES_CBC_SHA is 0xFEFE

    • SSL_RSA_FIPS_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA is 0xFEFF

    and 0x0047 has almost 0% at tlsfingerprint.io



    The second numbers (0xC001,0xC001,0xFFE1,0xFFE0) belong to SSL V2.



    The implementations can have different control by the maintainers, therefore it is good to have different numbers. It is bad that your original source doesn't list where they took the numbers.






    share|improve this answer
























      up vote
      3
      down vote













      These numbers belong to ElasticSeach;



      • TLS_ECDH_ECDSA_WITH_NULL_SHA is 0x0047

      • TLS_ECDH_ECDSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA is 0x0048

      • SSL_RSA_FIPS_WITH_DES_CBC_SHA is 0xFEFE

      • SSL_RSA_FIPS_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA is 0xFEFF

      and 0x0047 has almost 0% at tlsfingerprint.io



      The second numbers (0xC001,0xC001,0xFFE1,0xFFE0) belong to SSL V2.



      The implementations can have different control by the maintainers, therefore it is good to have different numbers. It is bad that your original source doesn't list where they took the numbers.






      share|improve this answer






















        up vote
        3
        down vote










        up vote
        3
        down vote









        These numbers belong to ElasticSeach;



        • TLS_ECDH_ECDSA_WITH_NULL_SHA is 0x0047

        • TLS_ECDH_ECDSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA is 0x0048

        • SSL_RSA_FIPS_WITH_DES_CBC_SHA is 0xFEFE

        • SSL_RSA_FIPS_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA is 0xFEFF

        and 0x0047 has almost 0% at tlsfingerprint.io



        The second numbers (0xC001,0xC001,0xFFE1,0xFFE0) belong to SSL V2.



        The implementations can have different control by the maintainers, therefore it is good to have different numbers. It is bad that your original source doesn't list where they took the numbers.






        share|improve this answer












        These numbers belong to ElasticSeach;



        • TLS_ECDH_ECDSA_WITH_NULL_SHA is 0x0047

        • TLS_ECDH_ECDSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA is 0x0048

        • SSL_RSA_FIPS_WITH_DES_CBC_SHA is 0xFEFE

        • SSL_RSA_FIPS_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA is 0xFEFF

        and 0x0047 has almost 0% at tlsfingerprint.io



        The second numbers (0xC001,0xC001,0xFFE1,0xFFE0) belong to SSL V2.



        The implementations can have different control by the maintainers, therefore it is good to have different numbers. It is bad that your original source doesn't list where they took the numbers.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 2 hours ago









        kelalaka

        2,199522




        2,199522




















            Yury Schkatula is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            Yury Schkatula is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Yury Schkatula is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            Yury Schkatula is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcrypto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f63635%2fcipher-suites-same-name-different-ids-why%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest
































































            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

            Image
            Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this question asked Sep 26 at 0:12 ToanLuong 49 9 add a comment  |  up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this question asked Se
            Read more

            Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

            Image
            Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP 1 How can I extract a single band from multi-band raster in QGIS? I have an remote sensed image which has 6 bands (including NDVI band), I want to display each band separately, but have no idea how to do. I have seen some questions similar here but none worked for me. The original image (has 6 bands) is: I want to display the band 6 which should be like this: But I tried gdal_translate, and couldn't get the correct result. What I have got is: qgis raster multi-band share | improve this question edited Mar 5 at 0:53 Summer asked Mar 4 at 6:42 Summer Summer 23 6 Is this any help gis.stackexchange.com/questions/220658/… ? if not gis.stackexchange.com/questions/62133/… might help. – Michael Stimson Mar 4 at 6:46 Thanks for answering but when I used gdal_translate, qgis showed that 'Error 4: Kayena.tif: No such file or directory". Would you know how to fix it? –
            Read more

            How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?

            Image
            Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 2 down vote favorite I am currently learning reverse engineering and am studying the flags register. I had in my mind that rflags was just another name for one of the 16 general purpose registers, for example rax or rbx . But it looks like rflags is actually an additional register. So that makes 17 registers in total... how many more could there be? I have spent at least an hour on this and found numerous different answers. The best answer so far is this, which says that there are 40 registers in total. 16 General Purpose Registers 2 Status Registers 6 Code Segment Registers 16 SSE Registers 8 FPU/MMX Registers But if I add that up, I get 48. Could anybody provide an official answer on how many registers an x86_64 CPU has (e.g. an Intel i7). Additionally, I have seen references to 'hardware' and 'architectural' registers. What are those registers and how many are there? register x86-64 share | improve this
            Read more