Sun's Stellar Class at Birth?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












The Sun currently has a stellar class of G2V. However, since its birth, the Sun has brightened significantly. What would the Sun's class have been when it was born ~4.6 gyr ago?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Arkenstein is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 1




    Since the spectral class is really determined at birth from its mass, its spectral type has always been G2V - the path that it takes throughout is lifetime is similar to the paths taken by other G2V stars... I don't think that the spectral class system really applies to protostars.
    – MystaryPi
    1 hour ago










  • @MystaryPi Ok, interesting. So stellar classification is less an indication of surface temperature/luminosity, but rather determined strictly by mass?
    – Arkenstein
    1 hour ago










  • Mass is one of the major factors that determine the spectral class of a star when they're born.
    – MystaryPi
    1 hour ago










  • @MystaryPi Thanks for your answer. Do you know whether it is possible to determine a star's Surface Temperature and Luminosity if you know its Mass and Age?
    – Arkenstein
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    Mass does not determine spectral type, since for almost all stars the mass is unknown (other than by appealing to relationships between mass and spectral type!)
    – Rob Jeffries
    1 hour ago














up vote
1
down vote

favorite












The Sun currently has a stellar class of G2V. However, since its birth, the Sun has brightened significantly. What would the Sun's class have been when it was born ~4.6 gyr ago?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Arkenstein is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 1




    Since the spectral class is really determined at birth from its mass, its spectral type has always been G2V - the path that it takes throughout is lifetime is similar to the paths taken by other G2V stars... I don't think that the spectral class system really applies to protostars.
    – MystaryPi
    1 hour ago










  • @MystaryPi Ok, interesting. So stellar classification is less an indication of surface temperature/luminosity, but rather determined strictly by mass?
    – Arkenstein
    1 hour ago










  • Mass is one of the major factors that determine the spectral class of a star when they're born.
    – MystaryPi
    1 hour ago










  • @MystaryPi Thanks for your answer. Do you know whether it is possible to determine a star's Surface Temperature and Luminosity if you know its Mass and Age?
    – Arkenstein
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    Mass does not determine spectral type, since for almost all stars the mass is unknown (other than by appealing to relationships between mass and spectral type!)
    – Rob Jeffries
    1 hour ago












up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











The Sun currently has a stellar class of G2V. However, since its birth, the Sun has brightened significantly. What would the Sun's class have been when it was born ~4.6 gyr ago?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Arkenstein is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











The Sun currently has a stellar class of G2V. However, since its birth, the Sun has brightened significantly. What would the Sun's class have been when it was born ~4.6 gyr ago?







the-sun stellar-evolution classification






share|improve this question







New contributor




Arkenstein is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




Arkenstein is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




Arkenstein is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 hours ago









Arkenstein

1062




1062




New contributor




Arkenstein is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Arkenstein is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Arkenstein is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 1




    Since the spectral class is really determined at birth from its mass, its spectral type has always been G2V - the path that it takes throughout is lifetime is similar to the paths taken by other G2V stars... I don't think that the spectral class system really applies to protostars.
    – MystaryPi
    1 hour ago










  • @MystaryPi Ok, interesting. So stellar classification is less an indication of surface temperature/luminosity, but rather determined strictly by mass?
    – Arkenstein
    1 hour ago










  • Mass is one of the major factors that determine the spectral class of a star when they're born.
    – MystaryPi
    1 hour ago










  • @MystaryPi Thanks for your answer. Do you know whether it is possible to determine a star's Surface Temperature and Luminosity if you know its Mass and Age?
    – Arkenstein
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    Mass does not determine spectral type, since for almost all stars the mass is unknown (other than by appealing to relationships between mass and spectral type!)
    – Rob Jeffries
    1 hour ago












  • 1




    Since the spectral class is really determined at birth from its mass, its spectral type has always been G2V - the path that it takes throughout is lifetime is similar to the paths taken by other G2V stars... I don't think that the spectral class system really applies to protostars.
    – MystaryPi
    1 hour ago










  • @MystaryPi Ok, interesting. So stellar classification is less an indication of surface temperature/luminosity, but rather determined strictly by mass?
    – Arkenstein
    1 hour ago










  • Mass is one of the major factors that determine the spectral class of a star when they're born.
    – MystaryPi
    1 hour ago










  • @MystaryPi Thanks for your answer. Do you know whether it is possible to determine a star's Surface Temperature and Luminosity if you know its Mass and Age?
    – Arkenstein
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    Mass does not determine spectral type, since for almost all stars the mass is unknown (other than by appealing to relationships between mass and spectral type!)
    – Rob Jeffries
    1 hour ago







1




1




Since the spectral class is really determined at birth from its mass, its spectral type has always been G2V - the path that it takes throughout is lifetime is similar to the paths taken by other G2V stars... I don't think that the spectral class system really applies to protostars.
– MystaryPi
1 hour ago




Since the spectral class is really determined at birth from its mass, its spectral type has always been G2V - the path that it takes throughout is lifetime is similar to the paths taken by other G2V stars... I don't think that the spectral class system really applies to protostars.
– MystaryPi
1 hour ago












@MystaryPi Ok, interesting. So stellar classification is less an indication of surface temperature/luminosity, but rather determined strictly by mass?
– Arkenstein
1 hour ago




@MystaryPi Ok, interesting. So stellar classification is less an indication of surface temperature/luminosity, but rather determined strictly by mass?
– Arkenstein
1 hour ago












Mass is one of the major factors that determine the spectral class of a star when they're born.
– MystaryPi
1 hour ago




Mass is one of the major factors that determine the spectral class of a star when they're born.
– MystaryPi
1 hour ago












@MystaryPi Thanks for your answer. Do you know whether it is possible to determine a star's Surface Temperature and Luminosity if you know its Mass and Age?
– Arkenstein
1 hour ago




@MystaryPi Thanks for your answer. Do you know whether it is possible to determine a star's Surface Temperature and Luminosity if you know its Mass and Age?
– Arkenstein
1 hour ago




1




1




Mass does not determine spectral type, since for almost all stars the mass is unknown (other than by appealing to relationships between mass and spectral type!)
– Rob Jeffries
1 hour ago




Mass does not determine spectral type, since for almost all stars the mass is unknown (other than by appealing to relationships between mass and spectral type!)
– Rob Jeffries
1 hour ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote













Spectral type is determined by (and is an indicator of) photospheric temperature and surface gravity. The classification of G2V applies to a star with a photospheric temperature of about 5800K and a surface gravity of about 100-1000 m/s$^2$.



The Sun's temperature and gravity have not changed greatly since it first appeared on the "zero age main sequence" - it has got a little bigger and more luminous and a little bit hotter (by about 170 K- Schroder & Smith 2008) - so maybe it was a G3V-G4V star at the zero age main sequence (Mamajek 2018).



However, there were much bigger changes during the 20 million years or so before the Sun reached the ZAMS. It was cooler and briefly much larger. This would be reflected in a spectral classification that was something like K5IV- M0IV; indicating a subgiant-like gravity and a temperature of about 4000K. As it aged, it would then shrink and become hotter, passing through the G5V-K5V spectral types before reaching the main sequence.



If you can synthesise these two diagrams in your head, you can see what I mean.



Pre main sequence evolution in the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram
PMS evolution



Spectral types on the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram
Spectral type HR






share|improve this answer



























    up vote
    1
    down vote













    Mass is one of the major factors that determine the spectral class of a star when it is born.



    During a star's protostar stages, a spectral class determines the length of its protostar stage and other factors such as its lifetime. Even though a spectral class is not physically assigned to them, the life stages that they undergo are essentially determined by their spectral class at birth.



    So even though protostars don't have a spectral class determined by scientists, the star that it ends up becoming in its main sequence is really what its spectral class is.



    So in this case, the Sun in it's protostar stages still was on the G2V route - it was taking the same (or at least similar) life cycles as stars in the G2V spectral class.



    Hope that helps!




    To the 2nd part:
    Check out this website, especially from page 18: http://www.astro.umass.edu/~myun/teaching/a100_old/Astro100Mar25.pdf. There's a lot of equations on there.



    There's also more information here on the luminosity-mass relationship: https://www.e-education.psu.edu/astro801/content/l7_p3.html



    On a side note, looks like someone asked about the luminosity+temperature and mass relationship on here as well: https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/12589/are-there-formulae-for-calculating-stellar-luminosity-and-effective-temperature



    If I find more information, I'll comment it or edit it onto my answer. Hope that helps!






    share|improve this answer


















    • 2




      Spectral type is measured from a spectrum. It is determined by temperature and to a lesser extent surface gravity. It is related to mass but not determined by it.
      – Rob Jeffries
      1 hour ago










    • Oh I didn't know that... I read from somewhere that the mass affects spectral class as well... Must have been incorrect... Looks like your answer seems to have it right - I will upvote it :)
      – MystaryPi
      22 mins ago










    • Mass only affects spectral type insofar as it affects gravity which affects the spectrum.
      – Rob Jeffries
      18 mins ago










    • Oh... So it does affect spectral class, it's just not the main cause of it. Thank you so much for helping me understand :)
      – MystaryPi
      13 mins ago

















    up vote
    0
    down vote













    It is true that on the main sequence, where most stars spend most of their lifetimes, mass is the main determining factor of all stellar parameters, with metallicity and angular momentum distant second-most important factors.



    However when a star is born, from the moment it becomes detectable, it moves through several stages of structural evolution, which surely do not classify as the stellar class that it later has on the main sequence.



    The evolutionary stages of this pre-main-sequence (PMS) star can be described in the astronomer's favourite diagram - the HR-diagram - via the Hayashi track.
    The Hayashi track is for any star of given mass the sequence of colour-luminosity values that it attains during its PMS evolution.



    As colour gives the stellar class, there is an evolution in stellar class for all stars, even on the main sequence.



    However




    since its birth, the Sun has brightened significantly.




    is incorrect. Once the sun arrived at the main sequence, it still brightened, yes, but that means there was an increase in Luminosity. As the wiki page on the sun's evolution clarifies in the figure seen below, the temperature however didn't change much during that time, therefore also not the stellar class.



    enter image description here



    Summarizing
    During the pre-main-sequence of a star the stellar class evolves significantly, on the main sequence it doesn't.






    share|improve this answer




















      Your Answer




      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "514"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: false,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );






      Arkenstein is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









       

      draft saved


      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fastronomy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f28140%2fsuns-stellar-class-at-birth%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest






























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      3
      down vote













      Spectral type is determined by (and is an indicator of) photospheric temperature and surface gravity. The classification of G2V applies to a star with a photospheric temperature of about 5800K and a surface gravity of about 100-1000 m/s$^2$.



      The Sun's temperature and gravity have not changed greatly since it first appeared on the "zero age main sequence" - it has got a little bigger and more luminous and a little bit hotter (by about 170 K- Schroder & Smith 2008) - so maybe it was a G3V-G4V star at the zero age main sequence (Mamajek 2018).



      However, there were much bigger changes during the 20 million years or so before the Sun reached the ZAMS. It was cooler and briefly much larger. This would be reflected in a spectral classification that was something like K5IV- M0IV; indicating a subgiant-like gravity and a temperature of about 4000K. As it aged, it would then shrink and become hotter, passing through the G5V-K5V spectral types before reaching the main sequence.



      If you can synthesise these two diagrams in your head, you can see what I mean.



      Pre main sequence evolution in the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram
      PMS evolution



      Spectral types on the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram
      Spectral type HR






      share|improve this answer
























        up vote
        3
        down vote













        Spectral type is determined by (and is an indicator of) photospheric temperature and surface gravity. The classification of G2V applies to a star with a photospheric temperature of about 5800K and a surface gravity of about 100-1000 m/s$^2$.



        The Sun's temperature and gravity have not changed greatly since it first appeared on the "zero age main sequence" - it has got a little bigger and more luminous and a little bit hotter (by about 170 K- Schroder & Smith 2008) - so maybe it was a G3V-G4V star at the zero age main sequence (Mamajek 2018).



        However, there were much bigger changes during the 20 million years or so before the Sun reached the ZAMS. It was cooler and briefly much larger. This would be reflected in a spectral classification that was something like K5IV- M0IV; indicating a subgiant-like gravity and a temperature of about 4000K. As it aged, it would then shrink and become hotter, passing through the G5V-K5V spectral types before reaching the main sequence.



        If you can synthesise these two diagrams in your head, you can see what I mean.



        Pre main sequence evolution in the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram
        PMS evolution



        Spectral types on the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram
        Spectral type HR






        share|improve this answer






















          up vote
          3
          down vote










          up vote
          3
          down vote









          Spectral type is determined by (and is an indicator of) photospheric temperature and surface gravity. The classification of G2V applies to a star with a photospheric temperature of about 5800K and a surface gravity of about 100-1000 m/s$^2$.



          The Sun's temperature and gravity have not changed greatly since it first appeared on the "zero age main sequence" - it has got a little bigger and more luminous and a little bit hotter (by about 170 K- Schroder & Smith 2008) - so maybe it was a G3V-G4V star at the zero age main sequence (Mamajek 2018).



          However, there were much bigger changes during the 20 million years or so before the Sun reached the ZAMS. It was cooler and briefly much larger. This would be reflected in a spectral classification that was something like K5IV- M0IV; indicating a subgiant-like gravity and a temperature of about 4000K. As it aged, it would then shrink and become hotter, passing through the G5V-K5V spectral types before reaching the main sequence.



          If you can synthesise these two diagrams in your head, you can see what I mean.



          Pre main sequence evolution in the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram
          PMS evolution



          Spectral types on the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram
          Spectral type HR






          share|improve this answer












          Spectral type is determined by (and is an indicator of) photospheric temperature and surface gravity. The classification of G2V applies to a star with a photospheric temperature of about 5800K and a surface gravity of about 100-1000 m/s$^2$.



          The Sun's temperature and gravity have not changed greatly since it first appeared on the "zero age main sequence" - it has got a little bigger and more luminous and a little bit hotter (by about 170 K- Schroder & Smith 2008) - so maybe it was a G3V-G4V star at the zero age main sequence (Mamajek 2018).



          However, there were much bigger changes during the 20 million years or so before the Sun reached the ZAMS. It was cooler and briefly much larger. This would be reflected in a spectral classification that was something like K5IV- M0IV; indicating a subgiant-like gravity and a temperature of about 4000K. As it aged, it would then shrink and become hotter, passing through the G5V-K5V spectral types before reaching the main sequence.



          If you can synthesise these two diagrams in your head, you can see what I mean.



          Pre main sequence evolution in the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram
          PMS evolution



          Spectral types on the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram
          Spectral type HR







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 48 mins ago









          Rob Jeffries

          48.4k494147




          48.4k494147




















              up vote
              1
              down vote













              Mass is one of the major factors that determine the spectral class of a star when it is born.



              During a star's protostar stages, a spectral class determines the length of its protostar stage and other factors such as its lifetime. Even though a spectral class is not physically assigned to them, the life stages that they undergo are essentially determined by their spectral class at birth.



              So even though protostars don't have a spectral class determined by scientists, the star that it ends up becoming in its main sequence is really what its spectral class is.



              So in this case, the Sun in it's protostar stages still was on the G2V route - it was taking the same (or at least similar) life cycles as stars in the G2V spectral class.



              Hope that helps!




              To the 2nd part:
              Check out this website, especially from page 18: http://www.astro.umass.edu/~myun/teaching/a100_old/Astro100Mar25.pdf. There's a lot of equations on there.



              There's also more information here on the luminosity-mass relationship: https://www.e-education.psu.edu/astro801/content/l7_p3.html



              On a side note, looks like someone asked about the luminosity+temperature and mass relationship on here as well: https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/12589/are-there-formulae-for-calculating-stellar-luminosity-and-effective-temperature



              If I find more information, I'll comment it or edit it onto my answer. Hope that helps!






              share|improve this answer


















              • 2




                Spectral type is measured from a spectrum. It is determined by temperature and to a lesser extent surface gravity. It is related to mass but not determined by it.
                – Rob Jeffries
                1 hour ago










              • Oh I didn't know that... I read from somewhere that the mass affects spectral class as well... Must have been incorrect... Looks like your answer seems to have it right - I will upvote it :)
                – MystaryPi
                22 mins ago










              • Mass only affects spectral type insofar as it affects gravity which affects the spectrum.
                – Rob Jeffries
                18 mins ago










              • Oh... So it does affect spectral class, it's just not the main cause of it. Thank you so much for helping me understand :)
                – MystaryPi
                13 mins ago














              up vote
              1
              down vote













              Mass is one of the major factors that determine the spectral class of a star when it is born.



              During a star's protostar stages, a spectral class determines the length of its protostar stage and other factors such as its lifetime. Even though a spectral class is not physically assigned to them, the life stages that they undergo are essentially determined by their spectral class at birth.



              So even though protostars don't have a spectral class determined by scientists, the star that it ends up becoming in its main sequence is really what its spectral class is.



              So in this case, the Sun in it's protostar stages still was on the G2V route - it was taking the same (or at least similar) life cycles as stars in the G2V spectral class.



              Hope that helps!




              To the 2nd part:
              Check out this website, especially from page 18: http://www.astro.umass.edu/~myun/teaching/a100_old/Astro100Mar25.pdf. There's a lot of equations on there.



              There's also more information here on the luminosity-mass relationship: https://www.e-education.psu.edu/astro801/content/l7_p3.html



              On a side note, looks like someone asked about the luminosity+temperature and mass relationship on here as well: https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/12589/are-there-formulae-for-calculating-stellar-luminosity-and-effective-temperature



              If I find more information, I'll comment it or edit it onto my answer. Hope that helps!






              share|improve this answer


















              • 2




                Spectral type is measured from a spectrum. It is determined by temperature and to a lesser extent surface gravity. It is related to mass but not determined by it.
                – Rob Jeffries
                1 hour ago










              • Oh I didn't know that... I read from somewhere that the mass affects spectral class as well... Must have been incorrect... Looks like your answer seems to have it right - I will upvote it :)
                – MystaryPi
                22 mins ago










              • Mass only affects spectral type insofar as it affects gravity which affects the spectrum.
                – Rob Jeffries
                18 mins ago










              • Oh... So it does affect spectral class, it's just not the main cause of it. Thank you so much for helping me understand :)
                – MystaryPi
                13 mins ago












              up vote
              1
              down vote










              up vote
              1
              down vote









              Mass is one of the major factors that determine the spectral class of a star when it is born.



              During a star's protostar stages, a spectral class determines the length of its protostar stage and other factors such as its lifetime. Even though a spectral class is not physically assigned to them, the life stages that they undergo are essentially determined by their spectral class at birth.



              So even though protostars don't have a spectral class determined by scientists, the star that it ends up becoming in its main sequence is really what its spectral class is.



              So in this case, the Sun in it's protostar stages still was on the G2V route - it was taking the same (or at least similar) life cycles as stars in the G2V spectral class.



              Hope that helps!




              To the 2nd part:
              Check out this website, especially from page 18: http://www.astro.umass.edu/~myun/teaching/a100_old/Astro100Mar25.pdf. There's a lot of equations on there.



              There's also more information here on the luminosity-mass relationship: https://www.e-education.psu.edu/astro801/content/l7_p3.html



              On a side note, looks like someone asked about the luminosity+temperature and mass relationship on here as well: https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/12589/are-there-formulae-for-calculating-stellar-luminosity-and-effective-temperature



              If I find more information, I'll comment it or edit it onto my answer. Hope that helps!






              share|improve this answer














              Mass is one of the major factors that determine the spectral class of a star when it is born.



              During a star's protostar stages, a spectral class determines the length of its protostar stage and other factors such as its lifetime. Even though a spectral class is not physically assigned to them, the life stages that they undergo are essentially determined by their spectral class at birth.



              So even though protostars don't have a spectral class determined by scientists, the star that it ends up becoming in its main sequence is really what its spectral class is.



              So in this case, the Sun in it's protostar stages still was on the G2V route - it was taking the same (or at least similar) life cycles as stars in the G2V spectral class.



              Hope that helps!




              To the 2nd part:
              Check out this website, especially from page 18: http://www.astro.umass.edu/~myun/teaching/a100_old/Astro100Mar25.pdf. There's a lot of equations on there.



              There's also more information here on the luminosity-mass relationship: https://www.e-education.psu.edu/astro801/content/l7_p3.html



              On a side note, looks like someone asked about the luminosity+temperature and mass relationship on here as well: https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/12589/are-there-formulae-for-calculating-stellar-luminosity-and-effective-temperature



              If I find more information, I'll comment it or edit it onto my answer. Hope that helps!







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited 1 hour ago

























              answered 1 hour ago









              MystaryPi

              31112




              31112







              • 2




                Spectral type is measured from a spectrum. It is determined by temperature and to a lesser extent surface gravity. It is related to mass but not determined by it.
                – Rob Jeffries
                1 hour ago










              • Oh I didn't know that... I read from somewhere that the mass affects spectral class as well... Must have been incorrect... Looks like your answer seems to have it right - I will upvote it :)
                – MystaryPi
                22 mins ago










              • Mass only affects spectral type insofar as it affects gravity which affects the spectrum.
                – Rob Jeffries
                18 mins ago










              • Oh... So it does affect spectral class, it's just not the main cause of it. Thank you so much for helping me understand :)
                – MystaryPi
                13 mins ago












              • 2




                Spectral type is measured from a spectrum. It is determined by temperature and to a lesser extent surface gravity. It is related to mass but not determined by it.
                – Rob Jeffries
                1 hour ago










              • Oh I didn't know that... I read from somewhere that the mass affects spectral class as well... Must have been incorrect... Looks like your answer seems to have it right - I will upvote it :)
                – MystaryPi
                22 mins ago










              • Mass only affects spectral type insofar as it affects gravity which affects the spectrum.
                – Rob Jeffries
                18 mins ago










              • Oh... So it does affect spectral class, it's just not the main cause of it. Thank you so much for helping me understand :)
                – MystaryPi
                13 mins ago







              2




              2




              Spectral type is measured from a spectrum. It is determined by temperature and to a lesser extent surface gravity. It is related to mass but not determined by it.
              – Rob Jeffries
              1 hour ago




              Spectral type is measured from a spectrum. It is determined by temperature and to a lesser extent surface gravity. It is related to mass but not determined by it.
              – Rob Jeffries
              1 hour ago












              Oh I didn't know that... I read from somewhere that the mass affects spectral class as well... Must have been incorrect... Looks like your answer seems to have it right - I will upvote it :)
              – MystaryPi
              22 mins ago




              Oh I didn't know that... I read from somewhere that the mass affects spectral class as well... Must have been incorrect... Looks like your answer seems to have it right - I will upvote it :)
              – MystaryPi
              22 mins ago












              Mass only affects spectral type insofar as it affects gravity which affects the spectrum.
              – Rob Jeffries
              18 mins ago




              Mass only affects spectral type insofar as it affects gravity which affects the spectrum.
              – Rob Jeffries
              18 mins ago












              Oh... So it does affect spectral class, it's just not the main cause of it. Thank you so much for helping me understand :)
              – MystaryPi
              13 mins ago




              Oh... So it does affect spectral class, it's just not the main cause of it. Thank you so much for helping me understand :)
              – MystaryPi
              13 mins ago










              up vote
              0
              down vote













              It is true that on the main sequence, where most stars spend most of their lifetimes, mass is the main determining factor of all stellar parameters, with metallicity and angular momentum distant second-most important factors.



              However when a star is born, from the moment it becomes detectable, it moves through several stages of structural evolution, which surely do not classify as the stellar class that it later has on the main sequence.



              The evolutionary stages of this pre-main-sequence (PMS) star can be described in the astronomer's favourite diagram - the HR-diagram - via the Hayashi track.
              The Hayashi track is for any star of given mass the sequence of colour-luminosity values that it attains during its PMS evolution.



              As colour gives the stellar class, there is an evolution in stellar class for all stars, even on the main sequence.



              However




              since its birth, the Sun has brightened significantly.




              is incorrect. Once the sun arrived at the main sequence, it still brightened, yes, but that means there was an increase in Luminosity. As the wiki page on the sun's evolution clarifies in the figure seen below, the temperature however didn't change much during that time, therefore also not the stellar class.



              enter image description here



              Summarizing
              During the pre-main-sequence of a star the stellar class evolves significantly, on the main sequence it doesn't.






              share|improve this answer
























                up vote
                0
                down vote













                It is true that on the main sequence, where most stars spend most of their lifetimes, mass is the main determining factor of all stellar parameters, with metallicity and angular momentum distant second-most important factors.



                However when a star is born, from the moment it becomes detectable, it moves through several stages of structural evolution, which surely do not classify as the stellar class that it later has on the main sequence.



                The evolutionary stages of this pre-main-sequence (PMS) star can be described in the astronomer's favourite diagram - the HR-diagram - via the Hayashi track.
                The Hayashi track is for any star of given mass the sequence of colour-luminosity values that it attains during its PMS evolution.



                As colour gives the stellar class, there is an evolution in stellar class for all stars, even on the main sequence.



                However




                since its birth, the Sun has brightened significantly.




                is incorrect. Once the sun arrived at the main sequence, it still brightened, yes, but that means there was an increase in Luminosity. As the wiki page on the sun's evolution clarifies in the figure seen below, the temperature however didn't change much during that time, therefore also not the stellar class.



                enter image description here



                Summarizing
                During the pre-main-sequence of a star the stellar class evolves significantly, on the main sequence it doesn't.






                share|improve this answer






















                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote









                  It is true that on the main sequence, where most stars spend most of their lifetimes, mass is the main determining factor of all stellar parameters, with metallicity and angular momentum distant second-most important factors.



                  However when a star is born, from the moment it becomes detectable, it moves through several stages of structural evolution, which surely do not classify as the stellar class that it later has on the main sequence.



                  The evolutionary stages of this pre-main-sequence (PMS) star can be described in the astronomer's favourite diagram - the HR-diagram - via the Hayashi track.
                  The Hayashi track is for any star of given mass the sequence of colour-luminosity values that it attains during its PMS evolution.



                  As colour gives the stellar class, there is an evolution in stellar class for all stars, even on the main sequence.



                  However




                  since its birth, the Sun has brightened significantly.




                  is incorrect. Once the sun arrived at the main sequence, it still brightened, yes, but that means there was an increase in Luminosity. As the wiki page on the sun's evolution clarifies in the figure seen below, the temperature however didn't change much during that time, therefore also not the stellar class.



                  enter image description here



                  Summarizing
                  During the pre-main-sequence of a star the stellar class evolves significantly, on the main sequence it doesn't.






                  share|improve this answer












                  It is true that on the main sequence, where most stars spend most of their lifetimes, mass is the main determining factor of all stellar parameters, with metallicity and angular momentum distant second-most important factors.



                  However when a star is born, from the moment it becomes detectable, it moves through several stages of structural evolution, which surely do not classify as the stellar class that it later has on the main sequence.



                  The evolutionary stages of this pre-main-sequence (PMS) star can be described in the astronomer's favourite diagram - the HR-diagram - via the Hayashi track.
                  The Hayashi track is for any star of given mass the sequence of colour-luminosity values that it attains during its PMS evolution.



                  As colour gives the stellar class, there is an evolution in stellar class for all stars, even on the main sequence.



                  However




                  since its birth, the Sun has brightened significantly.




                  is incorrect. Once the sun arrived at the main sequence, it still brightened, yes, but that means there was an increase in Luminosity. As the wiki page on the sun's evolution clarifies in the figure seen below, the temperature however didn't change much during that time, therefore also not the stellar class.



                  enter image description here



                  Summarizing
                  During the pre-main-sequence of a star the stellar class evolves significantly, on the main sequence it doesn't.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 41 mins ago









                  AtmosphericPrisonEscape

                  3,3971921




                  3,3971921




















                      Arkenstein is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                       

                      draft saved


                      draft discarded


















                      Arkenstein is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      Arkenstein is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                      Arkenstein is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                       


                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fastronomy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f28140%2fsuns-stellar-class-at-birth%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest













































































                      Popular posts from this blog

                      How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

                      Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

                      How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?