Flatness of direct image sheaf over local artinian ring

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Let $pi:X to mboxSpec(mathbbC[t]/(t^2))$ be a smooth, projective morphism and $L$ be an invertible sheaf on $X$. Denote by $L_0$ the restriction of $L$ to the closed fiber, say $X_0$ of $pi$. Suppose that the natural morphism $H^0(L) to H^0(L_0)$ is surjective. Can we conclude that $pi_*L$ is flat over $mboxSpec(mathbbC[t]/(t^2))$?










share|cite|improve this question

























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    Let $pi:X to mboxSpec(mathbbC[t]/(t^2))$ be a smooth, projective morphism and $L$ be an invertible sheaf on $X$. Denote by $L_0$ the restriction of $L$ to the closed fiber, say $X_0$ of $pi$. Suppose that the natural morphism $H^0(L) to H^0(L_0)$ is surjective. Can we conclude that $pi_*L$ is flat over $mboxSpec(mathbbC[t]/(t^2))$?










    share|cite|improve this question























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      Let $pi:X to mboxSpec(mathbbC[t]/(t^2))$ be a smooth, projective morphism and $L$ be an invertible sheaf on $X$. Denote by $L_0$ the restriction of $L$ to the closed fiber, say $X_0$ of $pi$. Suppose that the natural morphism $H^0(L) to H^0(L_0)$ is surjective. Can we conclude that $pi_*L$ is flat over $mboxSpec(mathbbC[t]/(t^2))$?










      share|cite|improve this question













      Let $pi:X to mboxSpec(mathbbC[t]/(t^2))$ be a smooth, projective morphism and $L$ be an invertible sheaf on $X$. Denote by $L_0$ the restriction of $L$ to the closed fiber, say $X_0$ of $pi$. Suppose that the natural morphism $H^0(L) to H^0(L_0)$ is surjective. Can we conclude that $pi_*L$ is flat over $mboxSpec(mathbbC[t]/(t^2))$?







      ag.algebraic-geometry deformation-theory invertible-sheaves






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked 4 hours ago









      Chen

      54639




      54639




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote













          This follows easily from the theory of modules over $R = mathbb C[t]/(t^2)$. Indeed, we have a short exact sequence
          $$0 to H^0(mathscr L_0) to H^0(mathscr L) to H^0(mathscr L_0) to 0,$$
          induced by the observation that $(t) cong R/(t)$ and your assumption that the map $H^0(mathscr L) to H^0(mathscr L_0)$ is surjective. Now we have the following lemma.



          Lemma. Let $0 to N stackrel fto M stackrel gto N to 0$ be a short exact sequence of finitely generated $R$-modules, and assume that $fg colon M to M$ is multiplication by $t$. Then $M$ is free and $N = tM cong M/tM$.



          Proof. Because $N stackrel fto M stackrel gto N$ is exact, $M stackrel gto N$ is surjective, and $N stackrel fto M$ is injective, the sequence
          $$M stackrelfg longrightarrow M stackrelfglongrightarrow Mtag1label1$$
          is exact. But we also have $fg = t$. From the structure theory of $R$-modules, we may write
          $$M cong R^m oplus (R/(t))^n$$
          for some $m,n in mathbb Z_geq 0$. If $n > 0$, then any nonzero element in $(R/(t))^n$ is killed by $t$ but not in the image of $t$, contradicting exactness of (ref1). We conclude that $n = 0$, so $M$ is free. The final statement follows since $N = operatornameim(fg) = tM$. $square$






          share|cite|improve this answer



























            up vote
            1
            down vote













            $newcommandCmathbbCnewcommandDC[t]/t^2newcommandimmathrmim,$A module $M$ over $D$ is flat if and only if the inclusion $(t)subset D$ remains injective after tensoring with $M$ over $D$. In other words, the map $M/tMxrightarrowt M$ is injective which is equivalent to saying that the inclusion $im (Mxrightarrowt M)subset ker, (Mxrightarrowt M)$ is equality. If $M$ is finite-dimensional as a $C$-vector space, then this condition is equivalent to $dimim t=dimker t=dim M-dim im t$ which can be rephrased as $dimim t=frac12dim M$(for a non-flat module the LHS is strictly smaller).



            (All of the above is more or less tautological since any finitely generated module over $D$ is a direct sum of some number of copies of $C$ and a few copies of $D$ and a module is flat iff it is free)



            Denote by $i:X_0to X$ the immersion of the closed fiber. we have an exact sequence of sheaves on $X$ $$0to Lotimes_D Cxrightarrowt Lto Lotimes_DCto 0$$ which can be rewritten as $$0to i_*L_0to Lto i_*L_0to 0$$ Applying $pi_*$ we get a sequence of $D$-modules which is in general not necessarily exact on the right, but you're assuming it is
            $$0topi_*i_*L_0topi_*Ltopi_*i_*L_0to 0$$ Since $pi$ is projective, $pi_*L$ is a finitely generated $D$-module and from the exact sequence we see that $dim_C pi_*L=2dim H^0(L_0)$. A priori, this exact sequence doesn't imply that $pi_*L$ is flat, but let's recall the meaning of the arrow $pi_*i_*L_0topi_*L$. Consider multiplication by $t$ as an endomorphism of $L$. Since $L$ is flat over $D$, it factors as $$Ltwoheadrightarrow i_*L_0hookrightarrow L$$
            Taking global sections and using your assumption again, we get $H^0(L_0)subsetim (pi_*Lxrightarrowtpi_*L)$ an this implies the desired equality $dimim t=frac12dim pi_*L$






            share|cite|improve this answer




















              Your Answer




              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              );
              );
              , "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "504"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: false,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













               

              draft saved


              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f312772%2fflatness-of-direct-image-sheaf-over-local-artinian-ring%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest






























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes








              up vote
              2
              down vote













              This follows easily from the theory of modules over $R = mathbb C[t]/(t^2)$. Indeed, we have a short exact sequence
              $$0 to H^0(mathscr L_0) to H^0(mathscr L) to H^0(mathscr L_0) to 0,$$
              induced by the observation that $(t) cong R/(t)$ and your assumption that the map $H^0(mathscr L) to H^0(mathscr L_0)$ is surjective. Now we have the following lemma.



              Lemma. Let $0 to N stackrel fto M stackrel gto N to 0$ be a short exact sequence of finitely generated $R$-modules, and assume that $fg colon M to M$ is multiplication by $t$. Then $M$ is free and $N = tM cong M/tM$.



              Proof. Because $N stackrel fto M stackrel gto N$ is exact, $M stackrel gto N$ is surjective, and $N stackrel fto M$ is injective, the sequence
              $$M stackrelfg longrightarrow M stackrelfglongrightarrow Mtag1label1$$
              is exact. But we also have $fg = t$. From the structure theory of $R$-modules, we may write
              $$M cong R^m oplus (R/(t))^n$$
              for some $m,n in mathbb Z_geq 0$. If $n > 0$, then any nonzero element in $(R/(t))^n$ is killed by $t$ but not in the image of $t$, contradicting exactness of (ref1). We conclude that $n = 0$, so $M$ is free. The final statement follows since $N = operatornameim(fg) = tM$. $square$






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                up vote
                2
                down vote













                This follows easily from the theory of modules over $R = mathbb C[t]/(t^2)$. Indeed, we have a short exact sequence
                $$0 to H^0(mathscr L_0) to H^0(mathscr L) to H^0(mathscr L_0) to 0,$$
                induced by the observation that $(t) cong R/(t)$ and your assumption that the map $H^0(mathscr L) to H^0(mathscr L_0)$ is surjective. Now we have the following lemma.



                Lemma. Let $0 to N stackrel fto M stackrel gto N to 0$ be a short exact sequence of finitely generated $R$-modules, and assume that $fg colon M to M$ is multiplication by $t$. Then $M$ is free and $N = tM cong M/tM$.



                Proof. Because $N stackrel fto M stackrel gto N$ is exact, $M stackrel gto N$ is surjective, and $N stackrel fto M$ is injective, the sequence
                $$M stackrelfg longrightarrow M stackrelfglongrightarrow Mtag1label1$$
                is exact. But we also have $fg = t$. From the structure theory of $R$-modules, we may write
                $$M cong R^m oplus (R/(t))^n$$
                for some $m,n in mathbb Z_geq 0$. If $n > 0$, then any nonzero element in $(R/(t))^n$ is killed by $t$ but not in the image of $t$, contradicting exactness of (ref1). We conclude that $n = 0$, so $M$ is free. The final statement follows since $N = operatornameim(fg) = tM$. $square$






                share|cite|improve this answer






















                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote









                  This follows easily from the theory of modules over $R = mathbb C[t]/(t^2)$. Indeed, we have a short exact sequence
                  $$0 to H^0(mathscr L_0) to H^0(mathscr L) to H^0(mathscr L_0) to 0,$$
                  induced by the observation that $(t) cong R/(t)$ and your assumption that the map $H^0(mathscr L) to H^0(mathscr L_0)$ is surjective. Now we have the following lemma.



                  Lemma. Let $0 to N stackrel fto M stackrel gto N to 0$ be a short exact sequence of finitely generated $R$-modules, and assume that $fg colon M to M$ is multiplication by $t$. Then $M$ is free and $N = tM cong M/tM$.



                  Proof. Because $N stackrel fto M stackrel gto N$ is exact, $M stackrel gto N$ is surjective, and $N stackrel fto M$ is injective, the sequence
                  $$M stackrelfg longrightarrow M stackrelfglongrightarrow Mtag1label1$$
                  is exact. But we also have $fg = t$. From the structure theory of $R$-modules, we may write
                  $$M cong R^m oplus (R/(t))^n$$
                  for some $m,n in mathbb Z_geq 0$. If $n > 0$, then any nonzero element in $(R/(t))^n$ is killed by $t$ but not in the image of $t$, contradicting exactness of (ref1). We conclude that $n = 0$, so $M$ is free. The final statement follows since $N = operatornameim(fg) = tM$. $square$






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  This follows easily from the theory of modules over $R = mathbb C[t]/(t^2)$. Indeed, we have a short exact sequence
                  $$0 to H^0(mathscr L_0) to H^0(mathscr L) to H^0(mathscr L_0) to 0,$$
                  induced by the observation that $(t) cong R/(t)$ and your assumption that the map $H^0(mathscr L) to H^0(mathscr L_0)$ is surjective. Now we have the following lemma.



                  Lemma. Let $0 to N stackrel fto M stackrel gto N to 0$ be a short exact sequence of finitely generated $R$-modules, and assume that $fg colon M to M$ is multiplication by $t$. Then $M$ is free and $N = tM cong M/tM$.



                  Proof. Because $N stackrel fto M stackrel gto N$ is exact, $M stackrel gto N$ is surjective, and $N stackrel fto M$ is injective, the sequence
                  $$M stackrelfg longrightarrow M stackrelfglongrightarrow Mtag1label1$$
                  is exact. But we also have $fg = t$. From the structure theory of $R$-modules, we may write
                  $$M cong R^m oplus (R/(t))^n$$
                  for some $m,n in mathbb Z_geq 0$. If $n > 0$, then any nonzero element in $(R/(t))^n$ is killed by $t$ but not in the image of $t$, contradicting exactness of (ref1). We conclude that $n = 0$, so $M$ is free. The final statement follows since $N = operatornameim(fg) = tM$. $square$







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 1 hour ago









                  R. van Dobben de Bruyn

                  9,63622959




                  9,63622959




















                      up vote
                      1
                      down vote













                      $newcommandCmathbbCnewcommandDC[t]/t^2newcommandimmathrmim,$A module $M$ over $D$ is flat if and only if the inclusion $(t)subset D$ remains injective after tensoring with $M$ over $D$. In other words, the map $M/tMxrightarrowt M$ is injective which is equivalent to saying that the inclusion $im (Mxrightarrowt M)subset ker, (Mxrightarrowt M)$ is equality. If $M$ is finite-dimensional as a $C$-vector space, then this condition is equivalent to $dimim t=dimker t=dim M-dim im t$ which can be rephrased as $dimim t=frac12dim M$(for a non-flat module the LHS is strictly smaller).



                      (All of the above is more or less tautological since any finitely generated module over $D$ is a direct sum of some number of copies of $C$ and a few copies of $D$ and a module is flat iff it is free)



                      Denote by $i:X_0to X$ the immersion of the closed fiber. we have an exact sequence of sheaves on $X$ $$0to Lotimes_D Cxrightarrowt Lto Lotimes_DCto 0$$ which can be rewritten as $$0to i_*L_0to Lto i_*L_0to 0$$ Applying $pi_*$ we get a sequence of $D$-modules which is in general not necessarily exact on the right, but you're assuming it is
                      $$0topi_*i_*L_0topi_*Ltopi_*i_*L_0to 0$$ Since $pi$ is projective, $pi_*L$ is a finitely generated $D$-module and from the exact sequence we see that $dim_C pi_*L=2dim H^0(L_0)$. A priori, this exact sequence doesn't imply that $pi_*L$ is flat, but let's recall the meaning of the arrow $pi_*i_*L_0topi_*L$. Consider multiplication by $t$ as an endomorphism of $L$. Since $L$ is flat over $D$, it factors as $$Ltwoheadrightarrow i_*L_0hookrightarrow L$$
                      Taking global sections and using your assumption again, we get $H^0(L_0)subsetim (pi_*Lxrightarrowtpi_*L)$ an this implies the desired equality $dimim t=frac12dim pi_*L$






                      share|cite|improve this answer
























                        up vote
                        1
                        down vote













                        $newcommandCmathbbCnewcommandDC[t]/t^2newcommandimmathrmim,$A module $M$ over $D$ is flat if and only if the inclusion $(t)subset D$ remains injective after tensoring with $M$ over $D$. In other words, the map $M/tMxrightarrowt M$ is injective which is equivalent to saying that the inclusion $im (Mxrightarrowt M)subset ker, (Mxrightarrowt M)$ is equality. If $M$ is finite-dimensional as a $C$-vector space, then this condition is equivalent to $dimim t=dimker t=dim M-dim im t$ which can be rephrased as $dimim t=frac12dim M$(for a non-flat module the LHS is strictly smaller).



                        (All of the above is more or less tautological since any finitely generated module over $D$ is a direct sum of some number of copies of $C$ and a few copies of $D$ and a module is flat iff it is free)



                        Denote by $i:X_0to X$ the immersion of the closed fiber. we have an exact sequence of sheaves on $X$ $$0to Lotimes_D Cxrightarrowt Lto Lotimes_DCto 0$$ which can be rewritten as $$0to i_*L_0to Lto i_*L_0to 0$$ Applying $pi_*$ we get a sequence of $D$-modules which is in general not necessarily exact on the right, but you're assuming it is
                        $$0topi_*i_*L_0topi_*Ltopi_*i_*L_0to 0$$ Since $pi$ is projective, $pi_*L$ is a finitely generated $D$-module and from the exact sequence we see that $dim_C pi_*L=2dim H^0(L_0)$. A priori, this exact sequence doesn't imply that $pi_*L$ is flat, but let's recall the meaning of the arrow $pi_*i_*L_0topi_*L$. Consider multiplication by $t$ as an endomorphism of $L$. Since $L$ is flat over $D$, it factors as $$Ltwoheadrightarrow i_*L_0hookrightarrow L$$
                        Taking global sections and using your assumption again, we get $H^0(L_0)subsetim (pi_*Lxrightarrowtpi_*L)$ an this implies the desired equality $dimim t=frac12dim pi_*L$






                        share|cite|improve this answer






















                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote










                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote









                          $newcommandCmathbbCnewcommandDC[t]/t^2newcommandimmathrmim,$A module $M$ over $D$ is flat if and only if the inclusion $(t)subset D$ remains injective after tensoring with $M$ over $D$. In other words, the map $M/tMxrightarrowt M$ is injective which is equivalent to saying that the inclusion $im (Mxrightarrowt M)subset ker, (Mxrightarrowt M)$ is equality. If $M$ is finite-dimensional as a $C$-vector space, then this condition is equivalent to $dimim t=dimker t=dim M-dim im t$ which can be rephrased as $dimim t=frac12dim M$(for a non-flat module the LHS is strictly smaller).



                          (All of the above is more or less tautological since any finitely generated module over $D$ is a direct sum of some number of copies of $C$ and a few copies of $D$ and a module is flat iff it is free)



                          Denote by $i:X_0to X$ the immersion of the closed fiber. we have an exact sequence of sheaves on $X$ $$0to Lotimes_D Cxrightarrowt Lto Lotimes_DCto 0$$ which can be rewritten as $$0to i_*L_0to Lto i_*L_0to 0$$ Applying $pi_*$ we get a sequence of $D$-modules which is in general not necessarily exact on the right, but you're assuming it is
                          $$0topi_*i_*L_0topi_*Ltopi_*i_*L_0to 0$$ Since $pi$ is projective, $pi_*L$ is a finitely generated $D$-module and from the exact sequence we see that $dim_C pi_*L=2dim H^0(L_0)$. A priori, this exact sequence doesn't imply that $pi_*L$ is flat, but let's recall the meaning of the arrow $pi_*i_*L_0topi_*L$. Consider multiplication by $t$ as an endomorphism of $L$. Since $L$ is flat over $D$, it factors as $$Ltwoheadrightarrow i_*L_0hookrightarrow L$$
                          Taking global sections and using your assumption again, we get $H^0(L_0)subsetim (pi_*Lxrightarrowtpi_*L)$ an this implies the desired equality $dimim t=frac12dim pi_*L$






                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          $newcommandCmathbbCnewcommandDC[t]/t^2newcommandimmathrmim,$A module $M$ over $D$ is flat if and only if the inclusion $(t)subset D$ remains injective after tensoring with $M$ over $D$. In other words, the map $M/tMxrightarrowt M$ is injective which is equivalent to saying that the inclusion $im (Mxrightarrowt M)subset ker, (Mxrightarrowt M)$ is equality. If $M$ is finite-dimensional as a $C$-vector space, then this condition is equivalent to $dimim t=dimker t=dim M-dim im t$ which can be rephrased as $dimim t=frac12dim M$(for a non-flat module the LHS is strictly smaller).



                          (All of the above is more or less tautological since any finitely generated module over $D$ is a direct sum of some number of copies of $C$ and a few copies of $D$ and a module is flat iff it is free)



                          Denote by $i:X_0to X$ the immersion of the closed fiber. we have an exact sequence of sheaves on $X$ $$0to Lotimes_D Cxrightarrowt Lto Lotimes_DCto 0$$ which can be rewritten as $$0to i_*L_0to Lto i_*L_0to 0$$ Applying $pi_*$ we get a sequence of $D$-modules which is in general not necessarily exact on the right, but you're assuming it is
                          $$0topi_*i_*L_0topi_*Ltopi_*i_*L_0to 0$$ Since $pi$ is projective, $pi_*L$ is a finitely generated $D$-module and from the exact sequence we see that $dim_C pi_*L=2dim H^0(L_0)$. A priori, this exact sequence doesn't imply that $pi_*L$ is flat, but let's recall the meaning of the arrow $pi_*i_*L_0topi_*L$. Consider multiplication by $t$ as an endomorphism of $L$. Since $L$ is flat over $D$, it factors as $$Ltwoheadrightarrow i_*L_0hookrightarrow L$$
                          Taking global sections and using your assumption again, we get $H^0(L_0)subsetim (pi_*Lxrightarrowtpi_*L)$ an this implies the desired equality $dimim t=frac12dim pi_*L$







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered 1 hour ago









                          SashaP

                          2,69511631




                          2,69511631



























                               

                              draft saved


                              draft discarded















































                               


                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f312772%2fflatness-of-direct-image-sheaf-over-local-artinian-ring%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest













































































                              Popular posts from this blog

                              How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

                              Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

                              How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?