apt-get build-dep is unable to find a source package
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
11
down vote
favorite
I have already followed this guide to disable middle mouse button paste on my Ubuntu 12.04.
Works like a charm.
Now I am trying to achieve the same on my Linux Mint 17. When I try to
sudo apt-get build-dep libgtk2.0-0
it gives me the following output:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Picking 'gtk+2.0' as source package instead of 'libgtk2.0-0'
E: Unable to find a source package for gtk+2.0
For me it looks like apt-get is somehow "resolving" 'libgtk2.0-0'
to 'gtk+2.0'
, but then does not find any package named like that.
EDIT:
although I am now able to compile the program (see my answer), I still do not know what Picking 'gtk+2.0' as source package instead of 'libgtk2.0-0'
is supposed to mean. Any insight on this would be appreciated, thanks!
apt compiling
add a comment |Â
up vote
11
down vote
favorite
I have already followed this guide to disable middle mouse button paste on my Ubuntu 12.04.
Works like a charm.
Now I am trying to achieve the same on my Linux Mint 17. When I try to
sudo apt-get build-dep libgtk2.0-0
it gives me the following output:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Picking 'gtk+2.0' as source package instead of 'libgtk2.0-0'
E: Unable to find a source package for gtk+2.0
For me it looks like apt-get is somehow "resolving" 'libgtk2.0-0'
to 'gtk+2.0'
, but then does not find any package named like that.
EDIT:
although I am now able to compile the program (see my answer), I still do not know what Picking 'gtk+2.0' as source package instead of 'libgtk2.0-0'
is supposed to mean. Any insight on this would be appreciated, thanks!
apt compiling
Have you enabled the relevantdeb-src
repository in your /etc/apt/sources.list?
â steeldriver
Sep 30 '14 at 12:14
add a comment |Â
up vote
11
down vote
favorite
up vote
11
down vote
favorite
I have already followed this guide to disable middle mouse button paste on my Ubuntu 12.04.
Works like a charm.
Now I am trying to achieve the same on my Linux Mint 17. When I try to
sudo apt-get build-dep libgtk2.0-0
it gives me the following output:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Picking 'gtk+2.0' as source package instead of 'libgtk2.0-0'
E: Unable to find a source package for gtk+2.0
For me it looks like apt-get is somehow "resolving" 'libgtk2.0-0'
to 'gtk+2.0'
, but then does not find any package named like that.
EDIT:
although I am now able to compile the program (see my answer), I still do not know what Picking 'gtk+2.0' as source package instead of 'libgtk2.0-0'
is supposed to mean. Any insight on this would be appreciated, thanks!
apt compiling
I have already followed this guide to disable middle mouse button paste on my Ubuntu 12.04.
Works like a charm.
Now I am trying to achieve the same on my Linux Mint 17. When I try to
sudo apt-get build-dep libgtk2.0-0
it gives me the following output:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Picking 'gtk+2.0' as source package instead of 'libgtk2.0-0'
E: Unable to find a source package for gtk+2.0
For me it looks like apt-get is somehow "resolving" 'libgtk2.0-0'
to 'gtk+2.0'
, but then does not find any package named like that.
EDIT:
although I am now able to compile the program (see my answer), I still do not know what Picking 'gtk+2.0' as source package instead of 'libgtk2.0-0'
is supposed to mean. Any insight on this would be appreciated, thanks!
apt compiling
apt compiling
edited Jun 13 at 11:13
GAD3R
23.7k1648100
23.7k1648100
asked Sep 30 '14 at 10:45
panepeter
2081210
2081210
Have you enabled the relevantdeb-src
repository in your /etc/apt/sources.list?
â steeldriver
Sep 30 '14 at 12:14
add a comment |Â
Have you enabled the relevantdeb-src
repository in your /etc/apt/sources.list?
â steeldriver
Sep 30 '14 at 12:14
Have you enabled the relevant
deb-src
repository in your /etc/apt/sources.list?â steeldriver
Sep 30 '14 at 12:14
Have you enabled the relevant
deb-src
repository in your /etc/apt/sources.list?â steeldriver
Sep 30 '14 at 12:14
add a comment |Â
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
13
down vote
accepted
As others have already noted, make sure that for every deb â¦
entry in /etc/apt/sources.list
and /etc/apt/sources.list.d/*
, you have a matching deb-src â¦
entry. The rest of the line must be identical. The deb
entry is for binary packages (i.e. ready to install), the deb-src
is for source packages (i.e. ready to compile). The reason why the two kinds of sources are separated is that they are managed very differently: binary packages have a dependency tracking mechanism and a currently-installed list, whereas source packages are only tracked so that they can be downloaded conveniently. Note that when discussing package repositories, the word source means two unrelated things: a source as in a location to download packages from, and a source package as opposed to a binary package.
libgtk2.0-0
is the name of a binary package. It is built from a source package called gtk+2.0
. The reason source and binary package names don't always match is that building a source package can produce multiple binary packages; for example, gtk+2.0
is the source for 14 packages as it is split into two libraries (libgtk2.0
, libgail), corresponding packages to build programs using these libraries (
â¦-dev), documentation for developers (
â¦-doc), companion programs (
libgtk2.0-bin`), etc.
You can see the name of the source package corresponding to a binary package by checking the Source: â¦
line in the output of dpkg -s BINARY_PACKAGE_NAME
(if the package is installed) or apt-cache show BINARY_PACKAGE_NAME
. You can list the binary packages produced by a source package with aptitude search '?source-package(^SOURCE_PACKAGE_NAME$)
.
The command apt-get source
downloads a source package. If you give it an argument which isn't a known source package, it looks it up in the database of installable binary packages and tries to download the corresponding source package. The command apt-get build-dep
follows the same approach to deduce the name of a source package, then queries the source package database to obtain a list of binary packages (the list in the Build-Dep:
field), and installs those binary packages.
The Software Sources GUI has a checkbox âÂÂenable repositories with source codeâ for official repositories, make sure that it's ticked. If you add third-party repositories manually, make sure that you add both deb-src
and deb
lines.
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
Thanks to @steeldriver, I figured out what to do.
Just had to add the following ling to my /etc/apt/sources.list
:
deb-src ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ stable main contrib
deb-src repositories contain sources packages (as opposed to binary, ready-to-install packages) needed for compiling.
Edit: After Adding this, you must execute sudo apt-get update
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
For the lazy and the Dockerers:
sudo sed -Ei 's/^# deb-src/deb-src/' /etc/apt/sources.list
sudo apt-get update
sudo build-dep qemu
Tested on Ubuntu 18.04.
add a comment |Â
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
13
down vote
accepted
As others have already noted, make sure that for every deb â¦
entry in /etc/apt/sources.list
and /etc/apt/sources.list.d/*
, you have a matching deb-src â¦
entry. The rest of the line must be identical. The deb
entry is for binary packages (i.e. ready to install), the deb-src
is for source packages (i.e. ready to compile). The reason why the two kinds of sources are separated is that they are managed very differently: binary packages have a dependency tracking mechanism and a currently-installed list, whereas source packages are only tracked so that they can be downloaded conveniently. Note that when discussing package repositories, the word source means two unrelated things: a source as in a location to download packages from, and a source package as opposed to a binary package.
libgtk2.0-0
is the name of a binary package. It is built from a source package called gtk+2.0
. The reason source and binary package names don't always match is that building a source package can produce multiple binary packages; for example, gtk+2.0
is the source for 14 packages as it is split into two libraries (libgtk2.0
, libgail), corresponding packages to build programs using these libraries (
â¦-dev), documentation for developers (
â¦-doc), companion programs (
libgtk2.0-bin`), etc.
You can see the name of the source package corresponding to a binary package by checking the Source: â¦
line in the output of dpkg -s BINARY_PACKAGE_NAME
(if the package is installed) or apt-cache show BINARY_PACKAGE_NAME
. You can list the binary packages produced by a source package with aptitude search '?source-package(^SOURCE_PACKAGE_NAME$)
.
The command apt-get source
downloads a source package. If you give it an argument which isn't a known source package, it looks it up in the database of installable binary packages and tries to download the corresponding source package. The command apt-get build-dep
follows the same approach to deduce the name of a source package, then queries the source package database to obtain a list of binary packages (the list in the Build-Dep:
field), and installs those binary packages.
The Software Sources GUI has a checkbox âÂÂenable repositories with source codeâ for official repositories, make sure that it's ticked. If you add third-party repositories manually, make sure that you add both deb-src
and deb
lines.
add a comment |Â
up vote
13
down vote
accepted
As others have already noted, make sure that for every deb â¦
entry in /etc/apt/sources.list
and /etc/apt/sources.list.d/*
, you have a matching deb-src â¦
entry. The rest of the line must be identical. The deb
entry is for binary packages (i.e. ready to install), the deb-src
is for source packages (i.e. ready to compile). The reason why the two kinds of sources are separated is that they are managed very differently: binary packages have a dependency tracking mechanism and a currently-installed list, whereas source packages are only tracked so that they can be downloaded conveniently. Note that when discussing package repositories, the word source means two unrelated things: a source as in a location to download packages from, and a source package as opposed to a binary package.
libgtk2.0-0
is the name of a binary package. It is built from a source package called gtk+2.0
. The reason source and binary package names don't always match is that building a source package can produce multiple binary packages; for example, gtk+2.0
is the source for 14 packages as it is split into two libraries (libgtk2.0
, libgail), corresponding packages to build programs using these libraries (
â¦-dev), documentation for developers (
â¦-doc), companion programs (
libgtk2.0-bin`), etc.
You can see the name of the source package corresponding to a binary package by checking the Source: â¦
line in the output of dpkg -s BINARY_PACKAGE_NAME
(if the package is installed) or apt-cache show BINARY_PACKAGE_NAME
. You can list the binary packages produced by a source package with aptitude search '?source-package(^SOURCE_PACKAGE_NAME$)
.
The command apt-get source
downloads a source package. If you give it an argument which isn't a known source package, it looks it up in the database of installable binary packages and tries to download the corresponding source package. The command apt-get build-dep
follows the same approach to deduce the name of a source package, then queries the source package database to obtain a list of binary packages (the list in the Build-Dep:
field), and installs those binary packages.
The Software Sources GUI has a checkbox âÂÂenable repositories with source codeâ for official repositories, make sure that it's ticked. If you add third-party repositories manually, make sure that you add both deb-src
and deb
lines.
add a comment |Â
up vote
13
down vote
accepted
up vote
13
down vote
accepted
As others have already noted, make sure that for every deb â¦
entry in /etc/apt/sources.list
and /etc/apt/sources.list.d/*
, you have a matching deb-src â¦
entry. The rest of the line must be identical. The deb
entry is for binary packages (i.e. ready to install), the deb-src
is for source packages (i.e. ready to compile). The reason why the two kinds of sources are separated is that they are managed very differently: binary packages have a dependency tracking mechanism and a currently-installed list, whereas source packages are only tracked so that they can be downloaded conveniently. Note that when discussing package repositories, the word source means two unrelated things: a source as in a location to download packages from, and a source package as opposed to a binary package.
libgtk2.0-0
is the name of a binary package. It is built from a source package called gtk+2.0
. The reason source and binary package names don't always match is that building a source package can produce multiple binary packages; for example, gtk+2.0
is the source for 14 packages as it is split into two libraries (libgtk2.0
, libgail), corresponding packages to build programs using these libraries (
â¦-dev), documentation for developers (
â¦-doc), companion programs (
libgtk2.0-bin`), etc.
You can see the name of the source package corresponding to a binary package by checking the Source: â¦
line in the output of dpkg -s BINARY_PACKAGE_NAME
(if the package is installed) or apt-cache show BINARY_PACKAGE_NAME
. You can list the binary packages produced by a source package with aptitude search '?source-package(^SOURCE_PACKAGE_NAME$)
.
The command apt-get source
downloads a source package. If you give it an argument which isn't a known source package, it looks it up in the database of installable binary packages and tries to download the corresponding source package. The command apt-get build-dep
follows the same approach to deduce the name of a source package, then queries the source package database to obtain a list of binary packages (the list in the Build-Dep:
field), and installs those binary packages.
The Software Sources GUI has a checkbox âÂÂenable repositories with source codeâ for official repositories, make sure that it's ticked. If you add third-party repositories manually, make sure that you add both deb-src
and deb
lines.
As others have already noted, make sure that for every deb â¦
entry in /etc/apt/sources.list
and /etc/apt/sources.list.d/*
, you have a matching deb-src â¦
entry. The rest of the line must be identical. The deb
entry is for binary packages (i.e. ready to install), the deb-src
is for source packages (i.e. ready to compile). The reason why the two kinds of sources are separated is that they are managed very differently: binary packages have a dependency tracking mechanism and a currently-installed list, whereas source packages are only tracked so that they can be downloaded conveniently. Note that when discussing package repositories, the word source means two unrelated things: a source as in a location to download packages from, and a source package as opposed to a binary package.
libgtk2.0-0
is the name of a binary package. It is built from a source package called gtk+2.0
. The reason source and binary package names don't always match is that building a source package can produce multiple binary packages; for example, gtk+2.0
is the source for 14 packages as it is split into two libraries (libgtk2.0
, libgail), corresponding packages to build programs using these libraries (
â¦-dev), documentation for developers (
â¦-doc), companion programs (
libgtk2.0-bin`), etc.
You can see the name of the source package corresponding to a binary package by checking the Source: â¦
line in the output of dpkg -s BINARY_PACKAGE_NAME
(if the package is installed) or apt-cache show BINARY_PACKAGE_NAME
. You can list the binary packages produced by a source package with aptitude search '?source-package(^SOURCE_PACKAGE_NAME$)
.
The command apt-get source
downloads a source package. If you give it an argument which isn't a known source package, it looks it up in the database of installable binary packages and tries to download the corresponding source package. The command apt-get build-dep
follows the same approach to deduce the name of a source package, then queries the source package database to obtain a list of binary packages (the list in the Build-Dep:
field), and installs those binary packages.
The Software Sources GUI has a checkbox âÂÂenable repositories with source codeâ for official repositories, make sure that it's ticked. If you add third-party repositories manually, make sure that you add both deb-src
and deb
lines.
edited Feb 26 '15 at 17:37
answered Sep 30 '14 at 22:55
Gilles
515k12210251554
515k12210251554
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
Thanks to @steeldriver, I figured out what to do.
Just had to add the following ling to my /etc/apt/sources.list
:
deb-src ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ stable main contrib
deb-src repositories contain sources packages (as opposed to binary, ready-to-install packages) needed for compiling.
Edit: After Adding this, you must execute sudo apt-get update
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
Thanks to @steeldriver, I figured out what to do.
Just had to add the following ling to my /etc/apt/sources.list
:
deb-src ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ stable main contrib
deb-src repositories contain sources packages (as opposed to binary, ready-to-install packages) needed for compiling.
Edit: After Adding this, you must execute sudo apt-get update
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
up vote
5
down vote
Thanks to @steeldriver, I figured out what to do.
Just had to add the following ling to my /etc/apt/sources.list
:
deb-src ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ stable main contrib
deb-src repositories contain sources packages (as opposed to binary, ready-to-install packages) needed for compiling.
Edit: After Adding this, you must execute sudo apt-get update
Thanks to @steeldriver, I figured out what to do.
Just had to add the following ling to my /etc/apt/sources.list
:
deb-src ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ stable main contrib
deb-src repositories contain sources packages (as opposed to binary, ready-to-install packages) needed for compiling.
Edit: After Adding this, you must execute sudo apt-get update
edited Oct 29 '16 at 6:41
VVJ
1033
1033
answered Sep 30 '14 at 13:40
panepeter
2081210
2081210
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
For the lazy and the Dockerers:
sudo sed -Ei 's/^# deb-src/deb-src/' /etc/apt/sources.list
sudo apt-get update
sudo build-dep qemu
Tested on Ubuntu 18.04.
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
For the lazy and the Dockerers:
sudo sed -Ei 's/^# deb-src/deb-src/' /etc/apt/sources.list
sudo apt-get update
sudo build-dep qemu
Tested on Ubuntu 18.04.
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
For the lazy and the Dockerers:
sudo sed -Ei 's/^# deb-src/deb-src/' /etc/apt/sources.list
sudo apt-get update
sudo build-dep qemu
Tested on Ubuntu 18.04.
For the lazy and the Dockerers:
sudo sed -Ei 's/^# deb-src/deb-src/' /etc/apt/sources.list
sudo apt-get update
sudo build-dep qemu
Tested on Ubuntu 18.04.
edited 3 mins ago
answered Apr 7 at 19:33
Ciro Santilli æ°çÂÂæ¹é ä¸Âå¿ å ÂÃ¥ÂÂäºÂ件 æ³Âè½®åÂÂ
4,52123938
4,52123938
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f158395%2fapt-get-build-dep-is-unable-to-find-a-source-package%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Have you enabled the relevant
deb-src
repository in your /etc/apt/sources.list?â steeldriver
Sep 30 '14 at 12:14