What is this GhostScript error? “/undefined in /BXlevelâ€Â
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
At first I thought this might have been a missing font issue but as far as I can tell from the output, GS is finding the font just fine..
Any hints as to what the problem might be?
$ /usr/bin/gs -dBATCH -dNOPAUSE -sDEVICE=pngalpha -sOutputFile="$RAWPNG" "$PDF_PATH/$PDF_FILENAME"
GNU Ghostscript 7.07 (2003-05-17)
Copyright (C) 2003 artofcode LLC, Benicia, CA. All rights reserved.
This software comes with NO WARRANTY: see the file PUBLIC for details.
Loading NimbusRomNo9L-Regu font from /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/n021003l.pfb... 2471956 1102101 1642520 351150 0 done.
Using NimbusRomanNo9L-Regu font for NimbusRomNo9L-Regu.
Loading NimbusSanL-Regu font from /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/n019003l.pfb... 2846916 1446739 1682712 365686 0 done.
Using NimbusSansL-Regu font for NimbusSanL-Regu.
Error: /undefined in /BXlevel
Operand stack:
--dict:2/2(L)-- 1 --dict:6/6(ro)(G)-- xref
Execution stack:
%interp_exit .runexec2 --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- 2 %stopped_push --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- false 1 %stopped_push 1 3 %oparray_pop 1 3 %oparray_pop 1 3 %oparray_pop --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- %loop_continue --nostringval-- false 1 %stopped_push --nostringval-- %loop_continue --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval--
Dictionary stack:
--dict:1062/1123(ro)(G)-- --dict:0/20(G)-- --dict:93/200(L)-- --dict:93/200(L)-- --dict:97/127(ro)(G)-- --dict:229/230(ro)(G)-- --dict:16/24(L)--
Current allocation mode is local
GNU Ghostscript 7.07: Unrecoverable error, exit code 1
pdf ghostscript png
edited Aug 21 at 15:05
Jeff Schaller
32.7k849110
asked Aug 21 at 14:47
Occam's Razor
1265
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
At first I thought this might have been a missing font issue but as far as I can tell from the output, GS is finding the font just fine..
Any hints as to what the problem might be?
$ /usr/bin/gs -dBATCH -dNOPAUSE -sDEVICE=pngalpha -sOutputFile="$RAWPNG" "$PDF_PATH/$PDF_FILENAME"
GNU Ghostscript 7.07 (2003-05-17)
Copyright (C) 2003 artofcode LLC, Benicia, CA. All rights reserved.
This software comes with NO WARRANTY: see the file PUBLIC for details.
Loading NimbusRomNo9L-Regu font from /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/n021003l.pfb... 2471956 1102101 1642520 351150 0 done.
Using NimbusRomanNo9L-Regu font for NimbusRomNo9L-Regu.
Loading NimbusSanL-Regu font from /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/n019003l.pfb... 2846916 1446739 1682712 365686 0 done.
Using NimbusSansL-Regu font for NimbusSanL-Regu.
Error: /undefined in /BXlevel
Operand stack:
--dict:2/2(L)-- 1 --dict:6/6(ro)(G)-- xref
Execution stack:
%interp_exit .runexec2 --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- 2 %stopped_push --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- false 1 %stopped_push 1 3 %oparray_pop 1 3 %oparray_pop 1 3 %oparray_pop --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- %loop_continue --nostringval-- false 1 %stopped_push --nostringval-- %loop_continue --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval--
Dictionary stack:
--dict:1062/1123(ro)(G)-- --dict:0/20(G)-- --dict:93/200(L)-- --dict:93/200(L)-- --dict:97/127(ro)(G)-- --dict:229/230(ro)(G)-- --dict:16/24(L)--
Current allocation mode is local
GNU Ghostscript 7.07: Unrecoverable error, exit code 1
pdf ghostscript png
edited Aug 21 at 15:05
Jeff Schaller
32.7k849110
asked Aug 21 at 14:47
Occam's Razor
1265
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
At first I thought this might have been a missing font issue but as far as I can tell from the output, GS is finding the font just fine..
Any hints as to what the problem might be?
$ /usr/bin/gs -dBATCH -dNOPAUSE -sDEVICE=pngalpha -sOutputFile="$RAWPNG" "$PDF_PATH/$PDF_FILENAME"
GNU Ghostscript 7.07 (2003-05-17)
Copyright (C) 2003 artofcode LLC, Benicia, CA. All rights reserved.
This software comes with NO WARRANTY: see the file PUBLIC for details.
Loading NimbusRomNo9L-Regu font from /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/n021003l.pfb... 2471956 1102101 1642520 351150 0 done.
Using NimbusRomanNo9L-Regu font for NimbusRomNo9L-Regu.
Loading NimbusSanL-Regu font from /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/n019003l.pfb... 2846916 1446739 1682712 365686 0 done.
Using NimbusSansL-Regu font for NimbusSanL-Regu.
Error: /undefined in /BXlevel
Operand stack:
--dict:2/2(L)-- 1 --dict:6/6(ro)(G)-- xref
Execution stack:
%interp_exit .runexec2 --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- 2 %stopped_push --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- false 1 %stopped_push 1 3 %oparray_pop 1 3 %oparray_pop 1 3 %oparray_pop --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- %loop_continue --nostringval-- false 1 %stopped_push --nostringval-- %loop_continue --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval--
Dictionary stack:
--dict:1062/1123(ro)(G)-- --dict:0/20(G)-- --dict:93/200(L)-- --dict:93/200(L)-- --dict:97/127(ro)(G)-- --dict:229/230(ro)(G)-- --dict:16/24(L)--
Current allocation mode is local
GNU Ghostscript 7.07: Unrecoverable error, exit code 1
pdf ghostscript png
edited Aug 21 at 15:05
Jeff Schaller
32.7k849110
asked Aug 21 at 14:47
Occam's Razor
1265
At first I thought this might have been a missing font issue but as far as I can tell from the output, GS is finding the font just fine..
Any hints as to what the problem might be?
$ /usr/bin/gs -dBATCH -dNOPAUSE -sDEVICE=pngalpha -sOutputFile="$RAWPNG" "$PDF_PATH/$PDF_FILENAME"
GNU Ghostscript 7.07 (2003-05-17)
Copyright (C) 2003 artofcode LLC, Benicia, CA. All rights reserved.
This software comes with NO WARRANTY: see the file PUBLIC for details.
Loading NimbusRomNo9L-Regu font from /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/n021003l.pfb... 2471956 1102101 1642520 351150 0 done.
Using NimbusRomanNo9L-Regu font for NimbusRomNo9L-Regu.
Loading NimbusSanL-Regu font from /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/n019003l.pfb... 2846916 1446739 1682712 365686 0 done.
Using NimbusSansL-Regu font for NimbusSanL-Regu.
Error: /undefined in /BXlevel
Operand stack:
--dict:2/2(L)-- 1 --dict:6/6(ro)(G)-- xref
Execution stack:
%interp_exit .runexec2 --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- 2 %stopped_push --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- false 1 %stopped_push 1 3 %oparray_pop 1 3 %oparray_pop 1 3 %oparray_pop --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- %loop_continue --nostringval-- false 1 %stopped_push --nostringval-- %loop_continue --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval--
Dictionary stack:
--dict:1062/1123(ro)(G)-- --dict:0/20(G)-- --dict:93/200(L)-- --dict:93/200(L)-- --dict:97/127(ro)(G)-- --dict:229/230(ro)(G)-- --dict:16/24(L)--
Current allocation mode is local
GNU Ghostscript 7.07: Unrecoverable error, exit code 1
pdf ghostscript png
pdf ghostscript png
edited Aug 21 at 15:05
Jeff Schaller
32.7k849110
asked Aug 21 at 14:47
Occam's Razor
1265
edited Aug 21 at 15:05
Jeff Schaller
32.7k849110
asked Aug 21 at 14:47
Occam's Razor
1265
edited Aug 21 at 15:05
Jeff Schaller
32.7k849110
edited Aug 21 at 15:05
Jeff Schaller
32.7k849110
edited Aug 21 at 15:05
Jeff Schaller
32.7k849110
32.7k849110
asked Aug 21 at 14:47
Occam's Razor
1265
asked Aug 21 at 14:47
Occam's Razor
1265
asked Aug 21 at 14:47
Occam's Razor
1265
1265
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
I'm noticing that you are using a very old GhostScript implementation. The error was reported to the GhostScript bug database in 2006 as bug #689876 (for releases 8.54 and 8.62) and should be fixed in more recent versions of the tool.
The error also crops up in a number of other bug reports (all quite old), but my main suggestion would be to try with a more recent GhostScript. The most recent release is 9.23.
answered Aug 21 at 14:55
Kusalananda
107k14209329
Thanks. I was afraid of that. Unfortunately updating is out of the question. We'll have to send it over the wire to a newer server.
– Occam's Razor
Aug 21 at 14:58
@Occam'sRazor Hmmm.... your whole system seems outdated. If this is a production system, I would strongly suggest that you do a proper update, to patch security related issues if not for any other reason.
– Kusalananda
Aug 21 at 15:49
Yeah, I know. We're updating things little by little. Not my call when specific things get done though.
– Occam's Razor
Aug 21 at 15:57
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
I'm noticing that you are using a very old GhostScript implementation. The error was reported to the GhostScript bug database in 2006 as bug #689876 (for releases 8.54 and 8.62) and should be fixed in more recent versions of the tool.
The error also crops up in a number of other bug reports (all quite old), but my main suggestion would be to try with a more recent GhostScript. The most recent release is 9.23.
answered Aug 21 at 14:55
Kusalananda
107k14209329
Thanks. I was afraid of that. Unfortunately updating is out of the question. We'll have to send it over the wire to a newer server.
– Occam's Razor
Aug 21 at 14:58
@Occam'sRazor Hmmm.... your whole system seems outdated. If this is a production system, I would strongly suggest that you do a proper update, to patch security related issues if not for any other reason.
– Kusalananda
Aug 21 at 15:49
Yeah, I know. We're updating things little by little. Not my call when specific things get done though.
– Occam's Razor
Aug 21 at 15:57
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
I'm noticing that you are using a very old GhostScript implementation. The error was reported to the GhostScript bug database in 2006 as bug #689876 (for releases 8.54 and 8.62) and should be fixed in more recent versions of the tool.
The error also crops up in a number of other bug reports (all quite old), but my main suggestion would be to try with a more recent GhostScript. The most recent release is 9.23.
answered Aug 21 at 14:55
Kusalananda
107k14209329
Thanks. I was afraid of that. Unfortunately updating is out of the question. We'll have to send it over the wire to a newer server.
– Occam's Razor
Aug 21 at 14:58
@Occam'sRazor Hmmm.... your whole system seems outdated. If this is a production system, I would strongly suggest that you do a proper update, to patch security related issues if not for any other reason.
– Kusalananda
Aug 21 at 15:49
Yeah, I know. We're updating things little by little. Not my call when specific things get done though.
– Occam's Razor
Aug 21 at 15:57
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
I'm noticing that you are using a very old GhostScript implementation. The error was reported to the GhostScript bug database in 2006 as bug #689876 (for releases 8.54 and 8.62) and should be fixed in more recent versions of the tool.
The error also crops up in a number of other bug reports (all quite old), but my main suggestion would be to try with a more recent GhostScript. The most recent release is 9.23.
answered Aug 21 at 14:55
Kusalananda
107k14209329
I'm noticing that you are using a very old GhostScript implementation. The error was reported to the GhostScript bug database in 2006 as bug #689876 (for releases 8.54 and 8.62) and should be fixed in more recent versions of the tool.
The error also crops up in a number of other bug reports (all quite old), but my main suggestion would be to try with a more recent GhostScript. The most recent release is 9.23.
answered Aug 21 at 14:55
Kusalananda
107k14209329
answered Aug 21 at 14:55
Kusalananda
107k14209329
answered Aug 21 at 14:55
Kusalananda
107k14209329
answered Aug 21 at 14:55
Kusalananda
107k14209329
107k14209329
Thanks. I was afraid of that. Unfortunately updating is out of the question. We'll have to send it over the wire to a newer server.
– Occam's Razor
Aug 21 at 14:58
@Occam'sRazor Hmmm.... your whole system seems outdated. If this is a production system, I would strongly suggest that you do a proper update, to patch security related issues if not for any other reason.
– Kusalananda
Aug 21 at 15:49
Yeah, I know. We're updating things little by little. Not my call when specific things get done though.
– Occam's Razor
Aug 21 at 15:57
add a comment |Â
Thanks. I was afraid of that. Unfortunately updating is out of the question. We'll have to send it over the wire to a newer server.
– Occam's Razor
Aug 21 at 14:58
@Occam'sRazor Hmmm.... your whole system seems outdated. If this is a production system, I would strongly suggest that you do a proper update, to patch security related issues if not for any other reason.
– Kusalananda
Aug 21 at 15:49
Yeah, I know. We're updating things little by little. Not my call when specific things get done though.
– Occam's Razor
Aug 21 at 15:57
Thanks. I was afraid of that. Unfortunately updating is out of the question. We'll have to send it over the wire to a newer server.
– Occam's Razor
Aug 21 at 14:58
Thanks. I was afraid of that. Unfortunately updating is out of the question. We'll have to send it over the wire to a newer server.
– Occam's Razor
Aug 21 at 14:58
@Occam'sRazor Hmmm.... your whole system seems outdated. If this is a production system, I would strongly suggest that you do a proper update, to patch security related issues if not for any other reason.
– Kusalananda
Aug 21 at 15:49
@Occam'sRazor Hmmm.... your whole system seems outdated. If this is a production system, I would strongly suggest that you do a proper update, to patch security related issues if not for any other reason.
– Kusalananda
Aug 21 at 15:49
Yeah, I know. We're updating things little by little. Not my call when specific things get done though.
– Occam's Razor
Aug 21 at 15:57
Yeah, I know. We're updating things little by little. Not my call when specific things get done though.
– Occam's Razor
Aug 21 at 15:57
add a comment |Â
Â
draft saved
draft discarded
Â
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f463886%2fwhat-is-this-ghostscript-error-undefined-in-bxlevel%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password