Show that the ring of polynomials with coefficients in a field, and in infinitely many variables, is not Noetherian

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1












Show that the ring of polynomials with coefficients in a
field, and in infinitely many variables, is not Noetherian, that is, $R = k [x_i: igeq1]$ is not Noetherian.



I know that I need to exhibit an ideal of the ring that is not finitely generated, what could this ideal be? Could it be $(x_1,x_2,...,)$?
Or could I give the following chain of ideals that do not have a maximal element $(x_1)subset(x_1,x_2)subset(x_1,x_2,x_3)subset...$?How can all ideals that are not finitely generated be classified? What to do in the case where the number of variables is non-countable?










share|cite|improve this question



























    up vote
    3
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    Show that the ring of polynomials with coefficients in a
    field, and in infinitely many variables, is not Noetherian, that is, $R = k [x_i: igeq1]$ is not Noetherian.



    I know that I need to exhibit an ideal of the ring that is not finitely generated, what could this ideal be? Could it be $(x_1,x_2,...,)$?
    Or could I give the following chain of ideals that do not have a maximal element $(x_1)subset(x_1,x_2)subset(x_1,x_2,x_3)subset...$?How can all ideals that are not finitely generated be classified? What to do in the case where the number of variables is non-countable?










    share|cite|improve this question

























      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      Show that the ring of polynomials with coefficients in a
      field, and in infinitely many variables, is not Noetherian, that is, $R = k [x_i: igeq1]$ is not Noetherian.



      I know that I need to exhibit an ideal of the ring that is not finitely generated, what could this ideal be? Could it be $(x_1,x_2,...,)$?
      Or could I give the following chain of ideals that do not have a maximal element $(x_1)subset(x_1,x_2)subset(x_1,x_2,x_3)subset...$?How can all ideals that are not finitely generated be classified? What to do in the case where the number of variables is non-countable?










      share|cite|improve this question















      Show that the ring of polynomials with coefficients in a
      field, and in infinitely many variables, is not Noetherian, that is, $R = k [x_i: igeq1]$ is not Noetherian.



      I know that I need to exhibit an ideal of the ring that is not finitely generated, what could this ideal be? Could it be $(x_1,x_2,...,)$?
      Or could I give the following chain of ideals that do not have a maximal element $(x_1)subset(x_1,x_2)subset(x_1,x_2,x_3)subset...$?How can all ideals that are not finitely generated be classified? What to do in the case where the number of variables is non-countable?







      abstract-algebra ring-theory commutative-algebra noetherian finitely-generated






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Aug 21 at 11:02









      user26857

      38.8k123778




      38.8k123778










      asked Aug 21 at 2:58









      Nash

      45229




      45229




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          4
          down vote













          A ring is Noetherian if and only if it satisfies the ascending chain condition, i.e. every increasing chain of ideals terminates. Now you have a chain
          $$(x_1)subsetneq(x_1,x_2)subsetneq(x_1,x_2,x_3)subsetneqcdots$$
          that never terminates, so $k[x_i: ige 1]$ is not Noetherian.






          share|cite|improve this answer



























            up vote
            3
            down vote













            You've got all the right ideas. You don't need to fully classify the non-finitely-generated ideals to prove that $(x_1,x_2,dots)$ is not finitely generated. One way to do it is to reason:



            Suppose $I = (x_1,x_2,dots)$ were finitely generated. Then there would be a finite list of generators $f_1,dots,f_n$. Each $f_i$ would be a polynomial in finitely many variables (because that's what elements of this ring are). Thus, there would be some $N$ that is the maximum $N$ for which $x_N$ appears in any of the $f_i$'s. Then, supposedly, every element of $I$ would be expressible as a linear combination of the $f_i$'s with coefficients in the ring of polynomials. But how would you ever express $x_k$ this way when $k>N$?






            share|cite|improve this answer




















              Your Answer




              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              );
              );
              , "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: false,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













               

              draft saved


              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2889434%2fshow-that-the-ring-of-polynomials-with-coefficients-in-a-field-and-in-infinitel%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest






























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes








              up vote
              4
              down vote













              A ring is Noetherian if and only if it satisfies the ascending chain condition, i.e. every increasing chain of ideals terminates. Now you have a chain
              $$(x_1)subsetneq(x_1,x_2)subsetneq(x_1,x_2,x_3)subsetneqcdots$$
              that never terminates, so $k[x_i: ige 1]$ is not Noetherian.






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                up vote
                4
                down vote













                A ring is Noetherian if and only if it satisfies the ascending chain condition, i.e. every increasing chain of ideals terminates. Now you have a chain
                $$(x_1)subsetneq(x_1,x_2)subsetneq(x_1,x_2,x_3)subsetneqcdots$$
                that never terminates, so $k[x_i: ige 1]$ is not Noetherian.






                share|cite|improve this answer






















                  up vote
                  4
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  4
                  down vote









                  A ring is Noetherian if and only if it satisfies the ascending chain condition, i.e. every increasing chain of ideals terminates. Now you have a chain
                  $$(x_1)subsetneq(x_1,x_2)subsetneq(x_1,x_2,x_3)subsetneqcdots$$
                  that never terminates, so $k[x_i: ige 1]$ is not Noetherian.






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  A ring is Noetherian if and only if it satisfies the ascending chain condition, i.e. every increasing chain of ideals terminates. Now you have a chain
                  $$(x_1)subsetneq(x_1,x_2)subsetneq(x_1,x_2,x_3)subsetneqcdots$$
                  that never terminates, so $k[x_i: ige 1]$ is not Noetherian.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Aug 21 at 3:05









                  Eclipse Sun

                  6,6221336




                  6,6221336




















                      up vote
                      3
                      down vote













                      You've got all the right ideas. You don't need to fully classify the non-finitely-generated ideals to prove that $(x_1,x_2,dots)$ is not finitely generated. One way to do it is to reason:



                      Suppose $I = (x_1,x_2,dots)$ were finitely generated. Then there would be a finite list of generators $f_1,dots,f_n$. Each $f_i$ would be a polynomial in finitely many variables (because that's what elements of this ring are). Thus, there would be some $N$ that is the maximum $N$ for which $x_N$ appears in any of the $f_i$'s. Then, supposedly, every element of $I$ would be expressible as a linear combination of the $f_i$'s with coefficients in the ring of polynomials. But how would you ever express $x_k$ this way when $k>N$?






                      share|cite|improve this answer
























                        up vote
                        3
                        down vote













                        You've got all the right ideas. You don't need to fully classify the non-finitely-generated ideals to prove that $(x_1,x_2,dots)$ is not finitely generated. One way to do it is to reason:



                        Suppose $I = (x_1,x_2,dots)$ were finitely generated. Then there would be a finite list of generators $f_1,dots,f_n$. Each $f_i$ would be a polynomial in finitely many variables (because that's what elements of this ring are). Thus, there would be some $N$ that is the maximum $N$ for which $x_N$ appears in any of the $f_i$'s. Then, supposedly, every element of $I$ would be expressible as a linear combination of the $f_i$'s with coefficients in the ring of polynomials. But how would you ever express $x_k$ this way when $k>N$?






                        share|cite|improve this answer






















                          up vote
                          3
                          down vote










                          up vote
                          3
                          down vote









                          You've got all the right ideas. You don't need to fully classify the non-finitely-generated ideals to prove that $(x_1,x_2,dots)$ is not finitely generated. One way to do it is to reason:



                          Suppose $I = (x_1,x_2,dots)$ were finitely generated. Then there would be a finite list of generators $f_1,dots,f_n$. Each $f_i$ would be a polynomial in finitely many variables (because that's what elements of this ring are). Thus, there would be some $N$ that is the maximum $N$ for which $x_N$ appears in any of the $f_i$'s. Then, supposedly, every element of $I$ would be expressible as a linear combination of the $f_i$'s with coefficients in the ring of polynomials. But how would you ever express $x_k$ this way when $k>N$?






                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          You've got all the right ideas. You don't need to fully classify the non-finitely-generated ideals to prove that $(x_1,x_2,dots)$ is not finitely generated. One way to do it is to reason:



                          Suppose $I = (x_1,x_2,dots)$ were finitely generated. Then there would be a finite list of generators $f_1,dots,f_n$. Each $f_i$ would be a polynomial in finitely many variables (because that's what elements of this ring are). Thus, there would be some $N$ that is the maximum $N$ for which $x_N$ appears in any of the $f_i$'s. Then, supposedly, every element of $I$ would be expressible as a linear combination of the $f_i$'s with coefficients in the ring of polynomials. But how would you ever express $x_k$ this way when $k>N$?







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered Aug 21 at 4:46









                          Ben Blum-Smith

                          9,71522981




                          9,71522981



























                               

                              draft saved


                              draft discarded















































                               


                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2889434%2fshow-that-the-ring-of-polynomials-with-coefficients-in-a-field-and-in-infinitel%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest













































































                              Popular posts from this blog

                              How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

                              Christian Cage

                              How to properly install USB display driver for Fresco Logic FL2000DX on Ubuntu?