Port fowarding and load balancer in ubuntu server 12.04

up vote
4
down vote

favorite

I am looking to create a load balancing server. Essentially here is what I want to do:

I have a public IP address, lets say 1.1.1.1 I have a second public IP address, lets say 2.2.2.2. I have a website, www.f.com point to 1.1.1.1 via an A record. I want that Ubuntu server to forward traffic like this:

Port 80 traffic is forwarded to 2.2.2.2 on port 60,000 and port 60,001.

Port 443 traffic is forwaded to 2.2.2.2 on port 60,010 and port 60,011.

Port 25 traffic is forwared to 2.2.2.2 on port 60,020 and port 60,021

The port forwarding is more important then being able to load balance.

I look forward to some responses. Both server 1.1.1.1 and 2.2.2.2 are both running Ubuntu 12.04 server edition.

edited Jul 12 '13 at 17:59

Braiam

22.6k1971132

asked Dec 3 '12 at 2:32

Matthew St Nicholas Iverson

244

1

This seems more like a proxy setup and less of a load balancer...you can use iptables to do forwarding for you.
â€“Â sparticvs
Dec 3 '12 at 4:29

Is it necessary to keep into account whether the destination port is up? If not, iptables DNAT rules should be able to do it...
â€“Â Gert van den Berg
Dec 3 '12 at 6:27

using LVS would make more sense here than iptables
â€“Â Rui F Ribeiro
Nov 16 '15 at 7:40

add a commentÂ |Â

up vote
4
down vote

favorite

I am looking to create a load balancing server. Essentially here is what I want to do:

Port 80 traffic is forwarded to 2.2.2.2 on port 60,000 and port 60,001.

Port 443 traffic is forwaded to 2.2.2.2 on port 60,010 and port 60,011.

Port 25 traffic is forwared to 2.2.2.2 on port 60,020 and port 60,021

The port forwarding is more important then being able to load balance.

I look forward to some responses. Both server 1.1.1.1 and 2.2.2.2 are both running Ubuntu 12.04 server edition.

edited Jul 12 '13 at 17:59

Braiam

22.6k1971132

asked Dec 3 '12 at 2:32

Matthew St Nicholas Iverson

244

1

This seems more like a proxy setup and less of a load balancer...you can use iptables to do forwarding for you.
â€“Â sparticvs
Dec 3 '12 at 4:29

Is it necessary to keep into account whether the destination port is up? If not, iptables DNAT rules should be able to do it...
â€“Â Gert van den Berg
Dec 3 '12 at 6:27

using LVS would make more sense here than iptables
â€“Â Rui F Ribeiro
Nov 16 '15 at 7:40

add a commentÂ |Â

up vote
4
down vote

favorite

I am looking to create a load balancing server. Essentially here is what I want to do:

Port 80 traffic is forwarded to 2.2.2.2 on port 60,000 and port 60,001.

Port 443 traffic is forwaded to 2.2.2.2 on port 60,010 and port 60,011.

Port 25 traffic is forwared to 2.2.2.2 on port 60,020 and port 60,021

The port forwarding is more important then being able to load balance.

I look forward to some responses. Both server 1.1.1.1 and 2.2.2.2 are both running Ubuntu 12.04 server edition.

edited Jul 12 '13 at 17:59

Braiam

22.6k1971132

asked Dec 3 '12 at 2:32

Matthew St Nicholas Iverson

244

I am looking to create a load balancing server. Essentially here is what I want to do:

Port 80 traffic is forwarded to 2.2.2.2 on port 60,000 and port 60,001.

Port 443 traffic is forwaded to 2.2.2.2 on port 60,010 and port 60,011.

Port 25 traffic is forwared to 2.2.2.2 on port 60,020 and port 60,021

The port forwarding is more important then being able to load balance.

I look forward to some responses. Both server 1.1.1.1 and 2.2.2.2 are both running Ubuntu 12.04 server edition.

iptables port-forwarding load-balancing

edited Jul 12 '13 at 17:59

Braiam

22.6k1971132

asked Dec 3 '12 at 2:32

Matthew St Nicholas Iverson

244

edited Jul 12 '13 at 17:59

Braiam

22.6k1971132

asked Dec 3 '12 at 2:32

Matthew St Nicholas Iverson

244

edited Jul 12 '13 at 17:59

Braiam

22.6k1971132

edited Jul 12 '13 at 17:59

Braiam

22.6k1971132

edited Jul 12 '13 at 17:59

Braiam

22.6k1971132

asked Dec 3 '12 at 2:32

Matthew St Nicholas Iverson

244

asked Dec 3 '12 at 2:32

Matthew St Nicholas Iverson

244

asked Dec 3 '12 at 2:32

Matthew St Nicholas Iverson

244

1

This seems more like a proxy setup and less of a load balancer...you can use iptables to do forwarding for you.
â€“Â sparticvs
Dec 3 '12 at 4:29

Is it necessary to keep into account whether the destination port is up? If not, iptables DNAT rules should be able to do it...
â€“Â Gert van den Berg
Dec 3 '12 at 6:27

using LVS would make more sense here than iptables
â€“Â Rui F Ribeiro
Nov 16 '15 at 7:40

add a commentÂ |Â

1

This seems more like a proxy setup and less of a load balancer...you can use iptables to do forwarding for you.
â€“Â sparticvs
Dec 3 '12 at 4:29

Is it necessary to keep into account whether the destination port is up? If not, iptables DNAT rules should be able to do it...
â€“Â Gert van den Berg
Dec 3 '12 at 6:27

using LVS would make more sense here than iptables
â€“Â Rui F Ribeiro
Nov 16 '15 at 7:40

This seems more like a proxy setup and less of a load balancer...you can use iptables to do forwarding for you.
â€“Â sparticvs
Dec 3 '12 at 4:29

Is it necessary to keep into account whether the destination port is up? If not, iptables DNAT rules should be able to do it...
â€“Â Gert van den Berg
Dec 3 '12 at 6:27

using LVS would make more sense here than iptables
â€“Â Rui F Ribeiro
Nov 16 '15 at 7:40

add a commentÂ |Â

3 Answers
3

active

oldest

votes

up vote
0
down vote

I would recommend Pound (http://www.apsis.ch/pound). It's lightweight, easy to configure, handles https quick and efficient, and does exactly what you want.

answered Dec 3 '12 at 19:25

Doka

614

add a commentÂ |Â

up vote
0
down vote

If you are looking to load balance data. I might recomend you to use varnish. It is easy to install and set and easy to add nodes later

answered Jul 15 '15 at 21:15

dSoultanis

1212

add a commentÂ |Â

up vote
0
down vote

If you want to serve HTTP or raw TCP traffic, HAProxy might be a good option to you. It satisfies all the conditions you provided above.

References:

http://www.haproxy.org/

answered Jan 1 at 11:26

Kamil Zabielski

5097

add a commentÂ |Â

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);

);

draft saved

draft discarded

StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f57419%2fport-fowarding-and-load-balancer-in-ubuntu-server-12-04%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

Name

3 Answers
3

active

oldest

votes

3 Answers
3

active

oldest

votes

up vote
0
down vote

I would recommend Pound (http://www.apsis.ch/pound). It's lightweight, easy to configure, handles https quick and efficient, and does exactly what you want.

answered Dec 3 '12 at 19:25

Doka

614

add a commentÂ |Â

up vote
0
down vote

I would recommend Pound (http://www.apsis.ch/pound). It's lightweight, easy to configure, handles https quick and efficient, and does exactly what you want.

answered Dec 3 '12 at 19:25

Doka

614

add a commentÂ |Â

up vote
0
down vote

I would recommend Pound (http://www.apsis.ch/pound). It's lightweight, easy to configure, handles https quick and efficient, and does exactly what you want.

answered Dec 3 '12 at 19:25

Doka

614

I would recommend Pound (http://www.apsis.ch/pound). It's lightweight, easy to configure, handles https quick and efficient, and does exactly what you want.

answered Dec 3 '12 at 19:25

Doka

614

answered Dec 3 '12 at 19:25

Doka

614

answered Dec 3 '12 at 19:25

Doka

614

answered Dec 3 '12 at 19:25

Doka

614

add a commentÂ |Â

up vote
0
down vote

If you are looking to load balance data. I might recomend you to use varnish. It is easy to install and set and easy to add nodes later

answered Jul 15 '15 at 21:15

dSoultanis

1212

add a commentÂ |Â

up vote
0
down vote

If you are looking to load balance data. I might recomend you to use varnish. It is easy to install and set and easy to add nodes later

answered Jul 15 '15 at 21:15

dSoultanis

1212

add a commentÂ |Â

up vote
0
down vote

If you are looking to load balance data. I might recomend you to use varnish. It is easy to install and set and easy to add nodes later

answered Jul 15 '15 at 21:15

dSoultanis

1212

If you are looking to load balance data. I might recomend you to use varnish. It is easy to install and set and easy to add nodes later

answered Jul 15 '15 at 21:15

dSoultanis

1212

answered Jul 15 '15 at 21:15

dSoultanis

1212

answered Jul 15 '15 at 21:15

dSoultanis

1212

answered Jul 15 '15 at 21:15

dSoultanis

1212

add a commentÂ |Â

up vote
0
down vote

If you want to serve HTTP or raw TCP traffic, HAProxy might be a good option to you. It satisfies all the conditions you provided above.

References:

http://www.haproxy.org/

answered Jan 1 at 11:26

Kamil Zabielski

5097

add a commentÂ |Â

up vote
0
down vote

If you want to serve HTTP or raw TCP traffic, HAProxy might be a good option to you. It satisfies all the conditions you provided above.

References:

http://www.haproxy.org/

answered Jan 1 at 11:26

Kamil Zabielski

5097

add a commentÂ |Â

up vote
0
down vote

If you want to serve HTTP or raw TCP traffic, HAProxy might be a good option to you. It satisfies all the conditions you provided above.

References:

http://www.haproxy.org/

answered Jan 1 at 11:26

Kamil Zabielski

5097

If you want to serve HTTP or raw TCP traffic, HAProxy might be a good option to you. It satisfies all the conditions you provided above.

References:

http://www.haproxy.org/

answered Jan 1 at 11:26

Kamil Zabielski

5097

answered Jan 1 at 11:26

Kamil Zabielski

5097

answered Jan 1 at 11:26

Kamil Zabielski

5097

answered Jan 1 at 11:26

Kamil Zabielski

5097

add a commentÂ |Â

draft saved

draft discarded

draft saved

draft discarded

Post as a guest

Name

JeydvczU5s1EmaQPU b9x JWUZv 3dVr2JMj

搜尋此網誌

mjhjmtu