Firewalld precedence and rich rules

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I have a firewalld config which I don't understand entirely. Why aren't the rich-rules taking any affect to allow ssh connections? If I don't put the IP addresses in the sources: the rich-rule isn't allowing the connection.



I have created 2 zones myself HQ, repectively homeusers.



What is the precedence and how should I handle this?



HQ (active)
 target: default
 icmp-block-inversion: no
 interfaces: 
 sources: 195.x.xxx.xxx 90.xxx.xx.xxx 95.xx.xx.xx
 services: ssh mysql telnet
 ports: 
 protocols: 
 masquerade: no
 forward-ports: 
 source-ports: 
 icmp-blocks: 
 rich rules: 
 rule family="ipv4" source address="195.x.xxx.xxx" service name="ssh" log prefix="SSH Access HQ" level="notice" accept
 rule family="ipv4" source address="90.xxx.xx.xxx" service name="ssh" log prefix="SSH Access HQ" level="notice" accept
 rule family="ipv4" source address="195.x.xxx.xxx" service name="ssh" log prefix="SSH Access xxxx" level="notice" accept

block
 target: %%REJECT%%
 icmp-block-inversion: no
 interfaces: 
 sources: 
 services: 
 ports: 
 protocols: 
 masquerade: no
 forward-ports: 
 source-ports: 
 icmp-blocks: 
 rich rules: 


dmz
 target: default
 icmp-block-inversion: no
 interfaces: 
 sources: 
 services: ssh
 ports: 
 protocols: 
 masquerade: no
 forward-ports: 
 source-ports: 
 icmp-blocks: 
 rich rules: 


drop
 target: DROP
 icmp-block-inversion: no
 interfaces: 
 sources: 
 services: 
 ports: 
 protocols: 
 masquerade: no
 forward-ports: 
 source-ports: 
 icmp-blocks: 
 rich rules: 


external
 target: default
 icmp-block-inversion: no
 interfaces: 
 sources: 
 services: ssh
 ports: 
 protocols: 
 masquerade: yes
 forward-ports: 
 source-ports: 
 icmp-blocks: 
 rich rules: 


home
 target: default
 icmp-block-inversion: no
 interfaces: 
 sources: 
 services: ssh mdns samba-client dhcpv6-client
 ports: 
 protocols: 
 masquerade: no
 forward-ports: 
 source-ports: 
 icmp-blocks: 
 rich rules: 


internal
 target: default
 icmp-block-inversion: no
 interfaces: 
 sources: 
 services: ssh mdns samba-client dhcpv6-client
 ports: 
 protocols: 
 masquerade: no
 forward-ports: 
 source-ports: 
 icmp-blocks: 
 rich rules: 


public
 target: default
 icmp-block-inversion: no
 interfaces: 
 sources: 
 services: https http
 ports: 
 protocols: 
 masquerade: no
 forward-ports: 
 source-ports: 
 icmp-blocks: 
 rich rules: 


homeusers (active)
 target: default
 icmp-block-inversion: no
 interfaces: 
 sources: 92.xxx.xxx.xxx 31.xxx.xxx.xxx 82.xx.xxx.xxx
 services: ssh mysql telnet
 ports: 
 protocols: 
 masquerade: no
 forward-ports: 
 source-ports: 
 icmp-blocks: 
 rich rules: 
 rule family="ipv4" source address="95.xx.xx.xx" service name="ssh" log prefix="SSH Access HQ" level="notice" accept
 rule family="ipv4" source address="92.xxx.xxx.xxx" service name="ssh" log prefix="SSH Access xxxxxxx" level="notice" accept
 rule family="ipv4" source address="31.xxx.xxx.xxx" service name="ssh" log prefix="SSH Access xwxwxw" level="notice" accept

trusted (active)
 target: default
 icmp-block-inversion: no
 interfaces: 
 sources: 127.0.0.1 19x.xxx.xxx.xxx
 services: mysql
 ports: 
 protocols: 
 masquerade: no
 forward-ports: 
 source-ports: 
 icmp-blocks: 
 rich rules: 


work
 target: default
 icmp-block-inversion: no
 interfaces: 
 sources: 
 services: ssh dhcpv6-client
 ports: 
 protocols: 
 masquerade: no
 forward-ports: 
 source-ports: 
 icmp-blocks: 
 rich rules:



centos networking iptables firewalld




share|improve this question




















  • Shouldn't rich rules: just be rules:
    – Raman Sailopal
    Nov 20 '17 at 12:05














up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I have a firewalld config which I don't understand entirely. Why aren't the rich-rules taking any affect to allow ssh connections? If I don't put the IP addresses in the sources: the rich-rule isn't allowing the connection.



I have created 2 zones myself HQ, repectively homeusers.



What is the precedence and how should I handle this?



HQ (active)
 target: default
 icmp-block-inversion: no
 interfaces: 
 sources: 195.x.xxx.xxx 90.xxx.xx.xxx 95.xx.xx.xx
 services: ssh mysql telnet
 ports: 
 protocols: 
 masquerade: no
 forward-ports: 
 source-ports: 
 icmp-blocks: 
 rich rules: 
 rule family="ipv4" source address="195.x.xxx.xxx" service name="ssh" log prefix="SSH Access HQ" level="notice" accept
 rule family="ipv4" source address="90.xxx.xx.xxx" service name="ssh" log prefix="SSH Access HQ" level="notice" accept
 rule family="ipv4" source address="195.x.xxx.xxx" service name="ssh" log prefix="SSH Access xxxx" level="notice" accept

block
 target: %%REJECT%%
 icmp-block-inversion: no
 interfaces: 
 sources: 
 services: 
 ports: 
 protocols: 
 masquerade: no
 forward-ports: 
 source-ports: 
 icmp-blocks: 
 rich rules: 


dmz
 target: default
 icmp-block-inversion: no
 interfaces: 
 sources: 
 services: ssh
 ports: 
 protocols: 
 masquerade: no
 forward-ports: 
 source-ports: 
 icmp-blocks: 
 rich rules: 


drop
 target: DROP
 icmp-block-inversion: no
 interfaces: 
 sources: 
 services: 
 ports: 
 protocols: 
 masquerade: no
 forward-ports: 
 source-ports: 
 icmp-blocks: 
 rich rules: 


external
 target: default
 icmp-block-inversion: no
 interfaces: 
 sources: 
 services: ssh
 ports: 
 protocols: 
 masquerade: yes
 forward-ports: 
 source-ports: 
 icmp-blocks: 
 rich rules: 


home
 target: default
 icmp-block-inversion: no
 interfaces: 
 sources: 
 services: ssh mdns samba-client dhcpv6-client
 ports: 
 protocols: 
 masquerade: no
 forward-ports: 
 source-ports: 
 icmp-blocks: 
 rich rules: 


internal
 target: default
 icmp-block-inversion: no
 interfaces: 
 sources: 
 services: ssh mdns samba-client dhcpv6-client
 ports: 
 protocols: 
 masquerade: no
 forward-ports: 
 source-ports: 
 icmp-blocks: 
 rich rules: 


public
 target: default
 icmp-block-inversion: no
 interfaces: 
 sources: 
 services: https http
 ports: 
 protocols: 
 masquerade: no
 forward-ports: 
 source-ports: 
 icmp-blocks: 
 rich rules: 


homeusers (active)
 target: default
 icmp-block-inversion: no
 interfaces: 
 sources: 92.xxx.xxx.xxx 31.xxx.xxx.xxx 82.xx.xxx.xxx
 services: ssh mysql telnet
 ports: 
 protocols: 
 masquerade: no
 forward-ports: 
 source-ports: 
 icmp-blocks: 
 rich rules: 
 rule family="ipv4" source address="95.xx.xx.xx" service name="ssh" log prefix="SSH Access HQ" level="notice" accept
 rule family="ipv4" source address="92.xxx.xxx.xxx" service name="ssh" log prefix="SSH Access xxxxxxx" level="notice" accept
 rule family="ipv4" source address="31.xxx.xxx.xxx" service name="ssh" log prefix="SSH Access xwxwxw" level="notice" accept

trusted (active)
 target: default
 icmp-block-inversion: no
 interfaces: 
 sources: 127.0.0.1 19x.xxx.xxx.xxx
 services: mysql
 ports: 
 protocols: 
 masquerade: no
 forward-ports: 
 source-ports: 
 icmp-blocks: 
 rich rules: 


work
 target: default
 icmp-block-inversion: no
 interfaces: 
 sources: 
 services: ssh dhcpv6-client
 ports: 
 protocols: 
 masquerade: no
 forward-ports: 
 source-ports: 
 icmp-blocks: 
 rich rules:



centos networking iptables firewalld




share|improve this question




















  • Shouldn't rich rules: just be rules:
    – Raman Sailopal
    Nov 20 '17 at 12:05












up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I have a firewalld config which I don't understand entirely. Why aren't the rich-rules taking any affect to allow ssh connections? If I don't put the IP addresses in the sources: the rich-rule isn't allowing the connection.



I have created 2 zones myself HQ, repectively homeusers.



What is the precedence and how should I handle this?



HQ (active)
 target: default
 icmp-block-inversion: no
 interfaces: 
 sources: 195.x.xxx.xxx 90.xxx.xx.xxx 95.xx.xx.xx
 services: ssh mysql telnet
 ports: 
 protocols: 
 masquerade: no
 forward-ports: 
 source-ports: 
 icmp-blocks: 
 rich rules: 
 rule family="ipv4" source address="195.x.xxx.xxx" service name="ssh" log prefix="SSH Access HQ" level="notice" accept
 rule family="ipv4" source address="90.xxx.xx.xxx" service name="ssh" log prefix="SSH Access HQ" level="notice" accept
 rule family="ipv4" source address="195.x.xxx.xxx" service name="ssh" log prefix="SSH Access xxxx" level="notice" accept

block
 target: %%REJECT%%
 icmp-block-inversion: no
 interfaces: 
 sources: 
 services: 
 ports: 
 protocols: 
 masquerade: no
 forward-ports: 
 source-ports: 
 icmp-blocks: 
 rich rules: 


dmz
 target: default
 icmp-block-inversion: no
 interfaces: 
 sources: 
 services: ssh
 ports: 
 protocols: 
 masquerade: no
 forward-ports: 
 source-ports: 
 icmp-blocks: 
 rich rules: 


drop
 target: DROP
 icmp-block-inversion: no
 interfaces: 
 sources: 
 services: 
 ports: 
 protocols: 
 masquerade: no
 forward-ports: 
 source-ports: 
 icmp-blocks: 
 rich rules: 


external
 target: default
 icmp-block-inversion: no
 interfaces: 
 sources: 
 services: ssh
 ports: 
 protocols: 
 masquerade: yes
 forward-ports: 
 source-ports: 
 icmp-blocks: 
 rich rules: 


home
 target: default
 icmp-block-inversion: no
 interfaces: 
 sources: 
 services: ssh mdns samba-client dhcpv6-client
 ports: 
 protocols: 
 masquerade: no
 forward-ports: 
 source-ports: 
 icmp-blocks: 
 rich rules: 


internal
 target: default
 icmp-block-inversion: no
 interfaces: 
 sources: 
 services: ssh mdns samba-client dhcpv6-client
 ports: 
 protocols: 
 masquerade: no
 forward-ports: 
 source-ports: 
 icmp-blocks: 
 rich rules: 


public
 target: default
 icmp-block-inversion: no
 interfaces: 
 sources: 
 services: https http
 ports: 
 protocols: 
 masquerade: no
 forward-ports: 
 source-ports: 
 icmp-blocks: 
 rich rules: 


homeusers (active)
 target: default
 icmp-block-inversion: no
 interfaces: 
 sources: 92.xxx.xxx.xxx 31.xxx.xxx.xxx 82.xx.xxx.xxx
 services: ssh mysql telnet
 ports: 
 protocols: 
 masquerade: no
 forward-ports: 
 source-ports: 
 icmp-blocks: 
 rich rules: 
 rule family="ipv4" source address="95.xx.xx.xx" service name="ssh" log prefix="SSH Access HQ" level="notice" accept
 rule family="ipv4" source address="92.xxx.xxx.xxx" service name="ssh" log prefix="SSH Access xxxxxxx" level="notice" accept
 rule family="ipv4" source address="31.xxx.xxx.xxx" service name="ssh" log prefix="SSH Access xwxwxw" level="notice" accept

trusted (active)
 target: default
 icmp-block-inversion: no
 interfaces: 
 sources: 127.0.0.1 19x.xxx.xxx.xxx
 services: mysql
 ports: 
 protocols: 
 masquerade: no
 forward-ports: 
 source-ports: 
 icmp-blocks: 
 rich rules: 


work
 target: default
 icmp-block-inversion: no
 interfaces: 
 sources: 
 services: ssh dhcpv6-client
 ports: 
 protocols: 
 masquerade: no
 forward-ports: 
 source-ports: 
 icmp-blocks: 
 rich rules:



centos networking iptables firewalld




share|improve this question












I have a firewalld config which I don't understand entirely. Why aren't the rich-rules taking any affect to allow ssh connections? If I don't put the IP addresses in the sources: the rich-rule isn't allowing the connection.



I have created 2 zones myself HQ, repectively homeusers.



What is the precedence and how should I handle this?



HQ (active)
 target: default
 icmp-block-inversion: no
 interfaces: 
 sources: 195.x.xxx.xxx 90.xxx.xx.xxx 95.xx.xx.xx
 services: ssh mysql telnet
 ports: 
 protocols: 
 masquerade: no
 forward-ports: 
 source-ports: 
 icmp-blocks: 
 rich rules: 
 rule family="ipv4" source address="195.x.xxx.xxx" service name="ssh" log prefix="SSH Access HQ" level="notice" accept
 rule family="ipv4" source address="90.xxx.xx.xxx" service name="ssh" log prefix="SSH Access HQ" level="notice" accept
 rule family="ipv4" source address="195.x.xxx.xxx" service name="ssh" log prefix="SSH Access xxxx" level="notice" accept

block
 target: %%REJECT%%
 icmp-block-inversion: no
 interfaces: 
 sources: 
 services: 
 ports: 
 protocols: 
 masquerade: no
 forward-ports: 
 source-ports: 
 icmp-blocks: 
 rich rules: 


dmz
 target: default
 icmp-block-inversion: no
 interfaces: 
 sources: 
 services: ssh
 ports: 
 protocols: 
 masquerade: no
 forward-ports: 
 source-ports: 
 icmp-blocks: 
 rich rules: 


drop
 target: DROP
 icmp-block-inversion: no
 interfaces: 
 sources: 
 services: 
 ports: 
 protocols: 
 masquerade: no
 forward-ports: 
 source-ports: 
 icmp-blocks: 
 rich rules: 


external
 target: default
 icmp-block-inversion: no
 interfaces: 
 sources: 
 services: ssh
 ports: 
 protocols: 
 masquerade: yes
 forward-ports: 
 source-ports: 
 icmp-blocks: 
 rich rules: 


home
 target: default
 icmp-block-inversion: no
 interfaces: 
 sources: 
 services: ssh mdns samba-client dhcpv6-client
 ports: 
 protocols: 
 masquerade: no
 forward-ports: 
 source-ports: 
 icmp-blocks: 
 rich rules: 


internal
 target: default
 icmp-block-inversion: no
 interfaces: 
 sources: 
 services: ssh mdns samba-client dhcpv6-client
 ports: 
 protocols: 
 masquerade: no
 forward-ports: 
 source-ports: 
 icmp-blocks: 
 rich rules: 


public
 target: default
 icmp-block-inversion: no
 interfaces: 
 sources: 
 services: https http
 ports: 
 protocols: 
 masquerade: no
 forward-ports: 
 source-ports: 
 icmp-blocks: 
 rich rules: 


homeusers (active)
 target: default
 icmp-block-inversion: no
 interfaces: 
 sources: 92.xxx.xxx.xxx 31.xxx.xxx.xxx 82.xx.xxx.xxx
 services: ssh mysql telnet
 ports: 
 protocols: 
 masquerade: no
 forward-ports: 
 source-ports: 
 icmp-blocks: 
 rich rules: 
 rule family="ipv4" source address="95.xx.xx.xx" service name="ssh" log prefix="SSH Access HQ" level="notice" accept
 rule family="ipv4" source address="92.xxx.xxx.xxx" service name="ssh" log prefix="SSH Access xxxxxxx" level="notice" accept
 rule family="ipv4" source address="31.xxx.xxx.xxx" service name="ssh" log prefix="SSH Access xwxwxw" level="notice" accept

trusted (active)
 target: default
 icmp-block-inversion: no
 interfaces: 
 sources: 127.0.0.1 19x.xxx.xxx.xxx
 services: mysql
 ports: 
 protocols: 
 masquerade: no
 forward-ports: 
 source-ports: 
 icmp-blocks: 
 rich rules: 


work
 target: default
 icmp-block-inversion: no
 interfaces: 
 sources: 
 services: ssh dhcpv6-client
 ports: 
 protocols: 
 masquerade: no
 forward-ports: 
 source-ports: 
 icmp-blocks: 
 rich rules:




centos networking iptables firewalld





share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 20 '17 at 11:45









holasz

139112




139112











  • Shouldn't rich rules: just be rules:
    – Raman Sailopal
    Nov 20 '17 at 12:05
















  • Shouldn't rich rules: just be rules:
    – Raman Sailopal
    Nov 20 '17 at 12:05















Shouldn't rich rules: just be rules:
– Raman Sailopal
Nov 20 '17 at 12:05




Shouldn't rich rules: just be rules:
– Raman Sailopal
Nov 20 '17 at 12:05















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer







StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f405751%2ffirewalld-precedence-and-rich-rules%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






















active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f405751%2ffirewalld-precedence-and-rich-rules%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest
































































-

Popular posts from this blog

How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

Image
Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this question asked Sep 26 at 0:12 ToanLuong 49 9 add a comment  |  up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this question asked Se
Read more

Bahrain

Image
For other uses, see Bahrain (disambiguation). Sovereign island state in the Persian Gulf Kingdom of Bahrain مملكة البحرين   (Arabic) Mamlakat al-Baḥrayn Flag Coat of arms Anthem:  نشيد البحرين الوطني Bahrainona Our Bahrain Location of   Bahrain    (circled in red) Capital and largest city Manama 26°13′N 50°35′E  /  26.217°N 50.583°E  / 26.217; 50.583 Official languages Arabic Ethnic groups (2010 [1] ) 50.7% Arab (46% Bahrani, 4.7% other Arabs) 45.5% Asian 1% European 1.2% Others Religion Islam Demonym(s) Bahraini Government Unitary constitutional monarchy • King Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa • Crown Prince Salman bin Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa • Prime Minister Khalifa bin Salman Al Khalifa Legislature National Assembly • Upper house Consultative Council • Lower house Council of Representatives Independence • Declared Independence [2] 14 August 1971 • from United Kingdom [1] 15 August 1971 • Admitted to the United Nations 21 September 1971 • Kingdom of Bahrain 14 February 2002
Read more

Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay

Image
Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 0 down vote favorite I am trying to setup postfix to relay all mail generated on the local machine via SMTP to a mailgun relay. I have used the mailgun relay before with success on an ubuntu server, but I am migrating to a Centos 7 server which I will be running in FIPS mode. There error log is below, slightly sanitized. I have a small enough network that I choose to have each machine reach out to mailgun individually (this the loopback-only, 127.0.0.0/8 restrictions) and no firewall open port allowing smtp in to the machine. I assume the FIPS mode (and with it disabling of MD5) is causing problems, but I don't know how to overcome it or if it is even possible for tls_fprint to use some supported hash such as sha256 or sha512. However, the relay=none is slightly concerning since I have relayhost set, but perhaps that is because the smtp process is failing? Any help would be appreciated! postconf -n: alias_database = hash:/etc/alia
Read more