What does the âls -1â command do?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
In my current directory, I execute the command:ls -1
and it gives a list of the current directory contents.
In the same directory, I repeat the command: ls
and it gives me the same result, with perhaps a different formatted output.
Finally, I try to find out about the available commands by typing ls --help
and the output is:
usage: ls [-ABCFGHLOPRSTUWabcdefghiklmnopqrstuwx1] [file ...]
It looks like the last option is 1
(#1). Can someone explain what the ls -1
does and how it's different to the standard ls
command?
shell osx ls
 |Â
show 2 more comments
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
In my current directory, I execute the command:ls -1
and it gives a list of the current directory contents.
In the same directory, I repeat the command: ls
and it gives me the same result, with perhaps a different formatted output.
Finally, I try to find out about the available commands by typing ls --help
and the output is:
usage: ls [-ABCFGHLOPRSTUWabcdefghiklmnopqrstuwx1] [file ...]
It looks like the last option is 1
(#1). Can someone explain what the ls -1
does and how it's different to the standard ls
command?
shell osx ls
1
Related questions are unix.stackexchange.com/questions/410550 , unix.stackexchange.com/questions/112125 , and unix.stackexchange.com/questions/111975 .
â JdeBP
Jul 19 at 13:45
1
check if your ls command is also aliased
â ron
Jul 19 at 13:56
I know Suse aliasiesls
in/etc/bash.bashrc
for example, and also has an environment variable "LS_OPTIONS" and they use some options I do not care for so I manually comment out any aliasing of thels
command; if this is happening under the hood on you without you knowing thenls
output can sometimes not make sense and be confusing (i.e. why is this happening)ls -1
should simply output one column but only if some other option is not overriding or preventing it from happening
â ron
Jul 19 at 14:03
1
ls -1
is often used by shell scripts to ensure there is minimal information and one file per line to make processing file names easy.
â Mark Stewart
Jul 19 at 14:20
2
@Mark indeed, but parsingls
is a bad idea, andls -1
is the default when the output isnâÂÂt a terminal (which is the case when the output is supposed to be processed in a script).
â Stephen Kitt
Jul 19 at 17:55
 |Â
show 2 more comments
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
In my current directory, I execute the command:ls -1
and it gives a list of the current directory contents.
In the same directory, I repeat the command: ls
and it gives me the same result, with perhaps a different formatted output.
Finally, I try to find out about the available commands by typing ls --help
and the output is:
usage: ls [-ABCFGHLOPRSTUWabcdefghiklmnopqrstuwx1] [file ...]
It looks like the last option is 1
(#1). Can someone explain what the ls -1
does and how it's different to the standard ls
command?
shell osx ls
In my current directory, I execute the command:ls -1
and it gives a list of the current directory contents.
In the same directory, I repeat the command: ls
and it gives me the same result, with perhaps a different formatted output.
Finally, I try to find out about the available commands by typing ls --help
and the output is:
usage: ls [-ABCFGHLOPRSTUWabcdefghiklmnopqrstuwx1] [file ...]
It looks like the last option is 1
(#1). Can someone explain what the ls -1
does and how it's different to the standard ls
command?
shell osx ls
edited Jul 19 at 13:59
Kusalananda
101k13199311
101k13199311
asked Jul 19 at 13:37
James Peter McConnell
194
194
1
Related questions are unix.stackexchange.com/questions/410550 , unix.stackexchange.com/questions/112125 , and unix.stackexchange.com/questions/111975 .
â JdeBP
Jul 19 at 13:45
1
check if your ls command is also aliased
â ron
Jul 19 at 13:56
I know Suse aliasiesls
in/etc/bash.bashrc
for example, and also has an environment variable "LS_OPTIONS" and they use some options I do not care for so I manually comment out any aliasing of thels
command; if this is happening under the hood on you without you knowing thenls
output can sometimes not make sense and be confusing (i.e. why is this happening)ls -1
should simply output one column but only if some other option is not overriding or preventing it from happening
â ron
Jul 19 at 14:03
1
ls -1
is often used by shell scripts to ensure there is minimal information and one file per line to make processing file names easy.
â Mark Stewart
Jul 19 at 14:20
2
@Mark indeed, but parsingls
is a bad idea, andls -1
is the default when the output isnâÂÂt a terminal (which is the case when the output is supposed to be processed in a script).
â Stephen Kitt
Jul 19 at 17:55
 |Â
show 2 more comments
1
Related questions are unix.stackexchange.com/questions/410550 , unix.stackexchange.com/questions/112125 , and unix.stackexchange.com/questions/111975 .
â JdeBP
Jul 19 at 13:45
1
check if your ls command is also aliased
â ron
Jul 19 at 13:56
I know Suse aliasiesls
in/etc/bash.bashrc
for example, and also has an environment variable "LS_OPTIONS" and they use some options I do not care for so I manually comment out any aliasing of thels
command; if this is happening under the hood on you without you knowing thenls
output can sometimes not make sense and be confusing (i.e. why is this happening)ls -1
should simply output one column but only if some other option is not overriding or preventing it from happening
â ron
Jul 19 at 14:03
1
ls -1
is often used by shell scripts to ensure there is minimal information and one file per line to make processing file names easy.
â Mark Stewart
Jul 19 at 14:20
2
@Mark indeed, but parsingls
is a bad idea, andls -1
is the default when the output isnâÂÂt a terminal (which is the case when the output is supposed to be processed in a script).
â Stephen Kitt
Jul 19 at 17:55
1
1
Related questions are unix.stackexchange.com/questions/410550 , unix.stackexchange.com/questions/112125 , and unix.stackexchange.com/questions/111975 .
â JdeBP
Jul 19 at 13:45
Related questions are unix.stackexchange.com/questions/410550 , unix.stackexchange.com/questions/112125 , and unix.stackexchange.com/questions/111975 .
â JdeBP
Jul 19 at 13:45
1
1
check if your ls command is also aliased
â ron
Jul 19 at 13:56
check if your ls command is also aliased
â ron
Jul 19 at 13:56
I know Suse aliasies
ls
in /etc/bash.bashrc
for example, and also has an environment variable "LS_OPTIONS" and they use some options I do not care for so I manually comment out any aliasing of the ls
command; if this is happening under the hood on you without you knowing then ls
output can sometimes not make sense and be confusing (i.e. why is this happening) ls -1
should simply output one column but only if some other option is not overriding or preventing it from happeningâ ron
Jul 19 at 14:03
I know Suse aliasies
ls
in /etc/bash.bashrc
for example, and also has an environment variable "LS_OPTIONS" and they use some options I do not care for so I manually comment out any aliasing of the ls
command; if this is happening under the hood on you without you knowing then ls
output can sometimes not make sense and be confusing (i.e. why is this happening) ls -1
should simply output one column but only if some other option is not overriding or preventing it from happeningâ ron
Jul 19 at 14:03
1
1
ls -1
is often used by shell scripts to ensure there is minimal information and one file per line to make processing file names easy.â Mark Stewart
Jul 19 at 14:20
ls -1
is often used by shell scripts to ensure there is minimal information and one file per line to make processing file names easy.â Mark Stewart
Jul 19 at 14:20
2
2
@Mark indeed, but parsing
ls
is a bad idea, and ls -1
is the default when the output isnâÂÂt a terminal (which is the case when the output is supposed to be processed in a script).â Stephen Kitt
Jul 19 at 17:55
@Mark indeed, but parsing
ls
is a bad idea, and ls -1
is the default when the output isnâÂÂt a terminal (which is the case when the output is supposed to be processed in a script).â Stephen Kitt
Jul 19 at 17:55
 |Â
show 2 more comments
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
17
down vote
accepted
Yes, the formatting of the output is the only difference between ls -1
and ls
without any options.
From the ls
manual on my system:
-1 (The numeric digit "one".) Force output to be one entry per line.
This is the default when output is not to a terminal.
This is also a POSIX option to the ls
utility.
The manual for ls
on your system is bound to say something similar (see man ls
).
Related:
- is piped ls the same as ls -1?
add a comment |Â
up vote
9
down vote
ls -1
lists one file per line. By default, when itâÂÂs outputting to a terminal, ls
lists files in columns, whose number varies depending on the length of the file names and the available space on screen.
To find this kind of information, man ls
works better than ls --help
. (This is true for most commands.)
man ls
works better thanls --help
Especially so as--help
is a non-portable non-POSIX extension.
â Andrew Henle
Jul 20 at 11:57
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
man ls
contains (searched via /-1<Enter>
)
--format=WORD
across -x, commas -m, horizontal -x, long -l, single-column -1, verbose -l, vertical -C
ls -1
triggers the single column mode. ls
by default displays its content in multiple columns, just like the column
command line tool would.
4
The user is on a BSD system, judging from whatls --help
produces. Their manual would unlikely contain--format
.
â Kusalananda
Jul 19 at 13:51
add a comment |Â
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
17
down vote
accepted
Yes, the formatting of the output is the only difference between ls -1
and ls
without any options.
From the ls
manual on my system:
-1 (The numeric digit "one".) Force output to be one entry per line.
This is the default when output is not to a terminal.
This is also a POSIX option to the ls
utility.
The manual for ls
on your system is bound to say something similar (see man ls
).
Related:
- is piped ls the same as ls -1?
add a comment |Â
up vote
17
down vote
accepted
Yes, the formatting of the output is the only difference between ls -1
and ls
without any options.
From the ls
manual on my system:
-1 (The numeric digit "one".) Force output to be one entry per line.
This is the default when output is not to a terminal.
This is also a POSIX option to the ls
utility.
The manual for ls
on your system is bound to say something similar (see man ls
).
Related:
- is piped ls the same as ls -1?
add a comment |Â
up vote
17
down vote
accepted
up vote
17
down vote
accepted
Yes, the formatting of the output is the only difference between ls -1
and ls
without any options.
From the ls
manual on my system:
-1 (The numeric digit "one".) Force output to be one entry per line.
This is the default when output is not to a terminal.
This is also a POSIX option to the ls
utility.
The manual for ls
on your system is bound to say something similar (see man ls
).
Related:
- is piped ls the same as ls -1?
Yes, the formatting of the output is the only difference between ls -1
and ls
without any options.
From the ls
manual on my system:
-1 (The numeric digit "one".) Force output to be one entry per line.
This is the default when output is not to a terminal.
This is also a POSIX option to the ls
utility.
The manual for ls
on your system is bound to say something similar (see man ls
).
Related:
- is piped ls the same as ls -1?
edited Jul 19 at 19:51
Salman A
1032
1032
answered Jul 19 at 13:39
Kusalananda
101k13199311
101k13199311
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
9
down vote
ls -1
lists one file per line. By default, when itâÂÂs outputting to a terminal, ls
lists files in columns, whose number varies depending on the length of the file names and the available space on screen.
To find this kind of information, man ls
works better than ls --help
. (This is true for most commands.)
man ls
works better thanls --help
Especially so as--help
is a non-portable non-POSIX extension.
â Andrew Henle
Jul 20 at 11:57
add a comment |Â
up vote
9
down vote
ls -1
lists one file per line. By default, when itâÂÂs outputting to a terminal, ls
lists files in columns, whose number varies depending on the length of the file names and the available space on screen.
To find this kind of information, man ls
works better than ls --help
. (This is true for most commands.)
man ls
works better thanls --help
Especially so as--help
is a non-portable non-POSIX extension.
â Andrew Henle
Jul 20 at 11:57
add a comment |Â
up vote
9
down vote
up vote
9
down vote
ls -1
lists one file per line. By default, when itâÂÂs outputting to a terminal, ls
lists files in columns, whose number varies depending on the length of the file names and the available space on screen.
To find this kind of information, man ls
works better than ls --help
. (This is true for most commands.)
ls -1
lists one file per line. By default, when itâÂÂs outputting to a terminal, ls
lists files in columns, whose number varies depending on the length of the file names and the available space on screen.
To find this kind of information, man ls
works better than ls --help
. (This is true for most commands.)
edited Jul 19 at 13:50
answered Jul 19 at 13:39
Stephen Kitt
139k22296359
139k22296359
man ls
works better thanls --help
Especially so as--help
is a non-portable non-POSIX extension.
â Andrew Henle
Jul 20 at 11:57
add a comment |Â
man ls
works better thanls --help
Especially so as--help
is a non-portable non-POSIX extension.
â Andrew Henle
Jul 20 at 11:57
man ls
works better than ls --help
Especially so as --help
is a non-portable non-POSIX extension.â Andrew Henle
Jul 20 at 11:57
man ls
works better than ls --help
Especially so as --help
is a non-portable non-POSIX extension.â Andrew Henle
Jul 20 at 11:57
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
man ls
contains (searched via /-1<Enter>
)
--format=WORD
across -x, commas -m, horizontal -x, long -l, single-column -1, verbose -l, vertical -C
ls -1
triggers the single column mode. ls
by default displays its content in multiple columns, just like the column
command line tool would.
4
The user is on a BSD system, judging from whatls --help
produces. Their manual would unlikely contain--format
.
â Kusalananda
Jul 19 at 13:51
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
man ls
contains (searched via /-1<Enter>
)
--format=WORD
across -x, commas -m, horizontal -x, long -l, single-column -1, verbose -l, vertical -C
ls -1
triggers the single column mode. ls
by default displays its content in multiple columns, just like the column
command line tool would.
4
The user is on a BSD system, judging from whatls --help
produces. Their manual would unlikely contain--format
.
â Kusalananda
Jul 19 at 13:51
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
man ls
contains (searched via /-1<Enter>
)
--format=WORD
across -x, commas -m, horizontal -x, long -l, single-column -1, verbose -l, vertical -C
ls -1
triggers the single column mode. ls
by default displays its content in multiple columns, just like the column
command line tool would.
man ls
contains (searched via /-1<Enter>
)
--format=WORD
across -x, commas -m, horizontal -x, long -l, single-column -1, verbose -l, vertical -C
ls -1
triggers the single column mode. ls
by default displays its content in multiple columns, just like the column
command line tool would.
answered Jul 19 at 13:43
phy-shell
365
365
4
The user is on a BSD system, judging from whatls --help
produces. Their manual would unlikely contain--format
.
â Kusalananda
Jul 19 at 13:51
add a comment |Â
4
The user is on a BSD system, judging from whatls --help
produces. Their manual would unlikely contain--format
.
â Kusalananda
Jul 19 at 13:51
4
4
The user is on a BSD system, judging from what
ls --help
produces. Their manual would unlikely contain --format
.â Kusalananda
Jul 19 at 13:51
The user is on a BSD system, judging from what
ls --help
produces. Their manual would unlikely contain --format
.â Kusalananda
Jul 19 at 13:51
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f457222%2fwhat-does-the-ls-1-command-do%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
1
Related questions are unix.stackexchange.com/questions/410550 , unix.stackexchange.com/questions/112125 , and unix.stackexchange.com/questions/111975 .
â JdeBP
Jul 19 at 13:45
1
check if your ls command is also aliased
â ron
Jul 19 at 13:56
I know Suse aliasies
ls
in/etc/bash.bashrc
for example, and also has an environment variable "LS_OPTIONS" and they use some options I do not care for so I manually comment out any aliasing of thels
command; if this is happening under the hood on you without you knowing thenls
output can sometimes not make sense and be confusing (i.e. why is this happening)ls -1
should simply output one column but only if some other option is not overriding or preventing it from happeningâ ron
Jul 19 at 14:03
1
ls -1
is often used by shell scripts to ensure there is minimal information and one file per line to make processing file names easy.â Mark Stewart
Jul 19 at 14:20
2
@Mark indeed, but parsing
ls
is a bad idea, andls -1
is the default when the output isnâÂÂt a terminal (which is the case when the output is supposed to be processed in a script).â Stephen Kitt
Jul 19 at 17:55