Unable to Mount… EXT4: First Meta block group too large

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












EXT4-fs (dm-46): first meta block group too large: 1152 (group descriptor block count 1096)


I have a filesystem, which is ext4, on a machine with 4.17.2-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64. The logical volume is 8.56 TiB.



This filesystem has been resized many times since it was first created.



It passes e2fsck:



e2fsck 1.42.9 (28-Dec-2013)
/dev/vg_areca/lv_MYLVNAME: clean, 59060/574488576 files, 2294844696/2297954304 blocks


After the last "resize2fs", I started receiving this error via "dmesg". I was running kernel 3.10.0-514.26.2.el7.x86_64 and after some googling, found that the current version of linux corrected a bug that produced this error. However, after updating the kernel, I am still getting the error.



My thoughts are that my multiple resizes has surfaced an issue, but I'm not sure how to address it.



debugfs output (minus 70k entries for Group 70127: (Blocks 2297921536-2297954303) [INODE_UNINIT, ITABLE_ZEROED]") is below




linux mount ext4 resize2fs




share|improve this question























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    EXT4-fs (dm-46): first meta block group too large: 1152 (group descriptor block count 1096)


    I have a filesystem, which is ext4, on a machine with 4.17.2-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64. The logical volume is 8.56 TiB.



    This filesystem has been resized many times since it was first created.



    It passes e2fsck:



    e2fsck 1.42.9 (28-Dec-2013)
    /dev/vg_areca/lv_MYLVNAME: clean, 59060/574488576 files, 2294844696/2297954304 blocks


    After the last "resize2fs", I started receiving this error via "dmesg". I was running kernel 3.10.0-514.26.2.el7.x86_64 and after some googling, found that the current version of linux corrected a bug that produced this error. However, after updating the kernel, I am still getting the error.



    My thoughts are that my multiple resizes has surfaced an issue, but I'm not sure how to address it.



    debugfs output (minus 70k entries for Group 70127: (Blocks 2297921536-2297954303) [INODE_UNINIT, ITABLE_ZEROED]") is below




    linux mount ext4 resize2fs




    share|improve this question





















      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      EXT4-fs (dm-46): first meta block group too large: 1152 (group descriptor block count 1096)


      I have a filesystem, which is ext4, on a machine with 4.17.2-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64. The logical volume is 8.56 TiB.



      This filesystem has been resized many times since it was first created.



      It passes e2fsck:



      e2fsck 1.42.9 (28-Dec-2013)
      /dev/vg_areca/lv_MYLVNAME: clean, 59060/574488576 files, 2294844696/2297954304 blocks


      After the last "resize2fs", I started receiving this error via "dmesg". I was running kernel 3.10.0-514.26.2.el7.x86_64 and after some googling, found that the current version of linux corrected a bug that produced this error. However, after updating the kernel, I am still getting the error.



      My thoughts are that my multiple resizes has surfaced an issue, but I'm not sure how to address it.



      debugfs output (minus 70k entries for Group 70127: (Blocks 2297921536-2297954303) [INODE_UNINIT, ITABLE_ZEROED]") is below




      linux mount ext4 resize2fs




      share|improve this question











      EXT4-fs (dm-46): first meta block group too large: 1152 (group descriptor block count 1096)


      I have a filesystem, which is ext4, on a machine with 4.17.2-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64. The logical volume is 8.56 TiB.



      This filesystem has been resized many times since it was first created.



      It passes e2fsck:



      e2fsck 1.42.9 (28-Dec-2013)
      /dev/vg_areca/lv_MYLVNAME: clean, 59060/574488576 files, 2294844696/2297954304 blocks


      After the last "resize2fs", I started receiving this error via "dmesg". I was running kernel 3.10.0-514.26.2.el7.x86_64 and after some googling, found that the current version of linux corrected a bug that produced this error. However, after updating the kernel, I am still getting the error.



      My thoughts are that my multiple resizes has surfaced an issue, but I'm not sure how to address it.



      debugfs output (minus 70k entries for Group 70127: (Blocks 2297921536-2297954303) [INODE_UNINIT, ITABLE_ZEROED]") is below





      linux mount ext4 resize2fs





      share|improve this question










      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question









      asked Jun 27 at 0:02









      Vin K

      11




      11

























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer







          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "106"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f452121%2funable-to-mount-ext4-first-meta-block-group-too-large%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






















          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes










           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f452121%2funable-to-mount-ext4-first-meta-block-group-too-large%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest
































































          -

          Popular posts from this blog

          How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

          Image
          Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this question asked Sep 26 at 0:12 ToanLuong 49 9 add a comment  |  up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this questi...
          Read more

          Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

          Image
          Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP 1 How can I extract a single band from multi-band raster in QGIS? I have an remote sensed image which has 6 bands (including NDVI band), I want to display each band separately, but have no idea how to do. I have seen some questions similar here but none worked for me. The original image (has 6 bands) is: I want to display the band 6 which should be like this: But I tried gdal_translate, and couldn't get the correct result. What I have got is: qgis raster multi-band share | improve this question edited Mar 5 at 0:53 Summer asked Mar 4 at 6:42 Summer Summer 23 6 Is this any help gis.stackexchange.com/questions/220658/… ? if not gis.stackexchange.com/questions/62133/… might help. – Michael Stimson Mar 4 at 6:46 Thanks for answering but when I used gdal_translate, qgis showed that 'Error 4: Kayena.tif: No such file or directory". Would you know how to fi...
          Read more

          How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?

          Image
          Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 2 down vote favorite I am currently learning reverse engineering and am studying the flags register. I had in my mind that rflags was just another name for one of the 16 general purpose registers, for example rax or rbx . But it looks like rflags is actually an additional register. So that makes 17 registers in total... how many more could there be? I have spent at least an hour on this and found numerous different answers. The best answer so far is this, which says that there are 40 registers in total. 16 General Purpose Registers 2 Status Registers 6 Code Segment Registers 16 SSE Registers 8 FPU/MMX Registers But if I add that up, I get 48. Could anybody provide an official answer on how many registers an x86_64 CPU has (e.g. an Intel i7). Additionally, I have seen references to 'hardware' and 'architectural' registers. What are those registers and how many are there? register x86-64 share | improve this...
          Read more