Swap is half full but nothing is going in or out of swap
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I ran a job that exceeded the memory, and began to write into the swap. The swap is 25 GB, and the RAM is 1TB.
I have stopped the job when the swap was full until 11GB, so 50% of it was still empty.
It did not trigger any OOM kill jobs, so everything is going as normal as before it happened.
I have only 8GB swap used now (3GB is cleaned after I have stopped the job), and it is slowly decreasing. But when I check vmstat
, the si
and so
are both 0
, so there is nothing going in or out of swap? How can this be possible?
free -lm
total used free shared buff/cache available
Mem: 1031757 475637 49100 63 507019 553720
Low: 1031757 982657 49100
High: 0 0 0
Swap: 25767 8272 17495
I have a free space of 40GB
in RAM
, so should I expect that my running jobs will be killed by OOM
not now but later on? 8GB
used in swap
is smaller than 40GB
free space in RAM
, so it looks fine, but I am not sure if still tells that OOM
won't be triggered..
Couple months ago, when the OOM
was triggered, it killed all my jobs and used swap was 25GB
(all full) and then 10 minutes later 0GB
.
However in this case, it takes a day to clean 2-3 GB
from swap.
Is it bad news for my running jobs?
Do you think my running jobs are in danger of being killed, not now but later on, when free swapspace reaches 0 GB
as it would trigger OOM
to kill?
If that is the case, how can I prevent it from happening?
I would appreciate any help.
memory kill swap
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I ran a job that exceeded the memory, and began to write into the swap. The swap is 25 GB, and the RAM is 1TB.
I have stopped the job when the swap was full until 11GB, so 50% of it was still empty.
It did not trigger any OOM kill jobs, so everything is going as normal as before it happened.
I have only 8GB swap used now (3GB is cleaned after I have stopped the job), and it is slowly decreasing. But when I check vmstat
, the si
and so
are both 0
, so there is nothing going in or out of swap? How can this be possible?
free -lm
total used free shared buff/cache available
Mem: 1031757 475637 49100 63 507019 553720
Low: 1031757 982657 49100
High: 0 0 0
Swap: 25767 8272 17495
I have a free space of 40GB
in RAM
, so should I expect that my running jobs will be killed by OOM
not now but later on? 8GB
used in swap
is smaller than 40GB
free space in RAM
, so it looks fine, but I am not sure if still tells that OOM
won't be triggered..
Couple months ago, when the OOM
was triggered, it killed all my jobs and used swap was 25GB
(all full) and then 10 minutes later 0GB
.
However in this case, it takes a day to clean 2-3 GB
from swap.
Is it bad news for my running jobs?
Do you think my running jobs are in danger of being killed, not now but later on, when free swapspace reaches 0 GB
as it would trigger OOM
to kill?
If that is the case, how can I prevent it from happening?
I would appreciate any help.
memory kill swap
you seem to have created a duplicate account. to fix, see unix.stackexchange.com/help/merging-accounts
â cas
Jan 30 at 12:06
2
Are you running vmstat with a count/delay?
â Raman Sailopal
Jan 30 at 12:19
I am not sure. I am just asking for vmstat without any parameters
â bapors
Jan 30 at 13:21
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I ran a job that exceeded the memory, and began to write into the swap. The swap is 25 GB, and the RAM is 1TB.
I have stopped the job when the swap was full until 11GB, so 50% of it was still empty.
It did not trigger any OOM kill jobs, so everything is going as normal as before it happened.
I have only 8GB swap used now (3GB is cleaned after I have stopped the job), and it is slowly decreasing. But when I check vmstat
, the si
and so
are both 0
, so there is nothing going in or out of swap? How can this be possible?
free -lm
total used free shared buff/cache available
Mem: 1031757 475637 49100 63 507019 553720
Low: 1031757 982657 49100
High: 0 0 0
Swap: 25767 8272 17495
I have a free space of 40GB
in RAM
, so should I expect that my running jobs will be killed by OOM
not now but later on? 8GB
used in swap
is smaller than 40GB
free space in RAM
, so it looks fine, but I am not sure if still tells that OOM
won't be triggered..
Couple months ago, when the OOM
was triggered, it killed all my jobs and used swap was 25GB
(all full) and then 10 minutes later 0GB
.
However in this case, it takes a day to clean 2-3 GB
from swap.
Is it bad news for my running jobs?
Do you think my running jobs are in danger of being killed, not now but later on, when free swapspace reaches 0 GB
as it would trigger OOM
to kill?
If that is the case, how can I prevent it from happening?
I would appreciate any help.
memory kill swap
I ran a job that exceeded the memory, and began to write into the swap. The swap is 25 GB, and the RAM is 1TB.
I have stopped the job when the swap was full until 11GB, so 50% of it was still empty.
It did not trigger any OOM kill jobs, so everything is going as normal as before it happened.
I have only 8GB swap used now (3GB is cleaned after I have stopped the job), and it is slowly decreasing. But when I check vmstat
, the si
and so
are both 0
, so there is nothing going in or out of swap? How can this be possible?
free -lm
total used free shared buff/cache available
Mem: 1031757 475637 49100 63 507019 553720
Low: 1031757 982657 49100
High: 0 0 0
Swap: 25767 8272 17495
I have a free space of 40GB
in RAM
, so should I expect that my running jobs will be killed by OOM
not now but later on? 8GB
used in swap
is smaller than 40GB
free space in RAM
, so it looks fine, but I am not sure if still tells that OOM
won't be triggered..
Couple months ago, when the OOM
was triggered, it killed all my jobs and used swap was 25GB
(all full) and then 10 minutes later 0GB
.
However in this case, it takes a day to clean 2-3 GB
from swap.
Is it bad news for my running jobs?
Do you think my running jobs are in danger of being killed, not now but later on, when free swapspace reaches 0 GB
as it would trigger OOM
to kill?
If that is the case, how can I prevent it from happening?
I would appreciate any help.
memory kill swap
edited Jan 30 at 15:15
wurtel
9,18511024
9,18511024
asked Jan 30 at 11:51
bapors
1
1
you seem to have created a duplicate account. to fix, see unix.stackexchange.com/help/merging-accounts
â cas
Jan 30 at 12:06
2
Are you running vmstat with a count/delay?
â Raman Sailopal
Jan 30 at 12:19
I am not sure. I am just asking for vmstat without any parameters
â bapors
Jan 30 at 13:21
add a comment |Â
you seem to have created a duplicate account. to fix, see unix.stackexchange.com/help/merging-accounts
â cas
Jan 30 at 12:06
2
Are you running vmstat with a count/delay?
â Raman Sailopal
Jan 30 at 12:19
I am not sure. I am just asking for vmstat without any parameters
â bapors
Jan 30 at 13:21
you seem to have created a duplicate account. to fix, see unix.stackexchange.com/help/merging-accounts
â cas
Jan 30 at 12:06
you seem to have created a duplicate account. to fix, see unix.stackexchange.com/help/merging-accounts
â cas
Jan 30 at 12:06
2
2
Are you running vmstat with a count/delay?
â Raman Sailopal
Jan 30 at 12:19
Are you running vmstat with a count/delay?
â Raman Sailopal
Jan 30 at 12:19
I am not sure. I am just asking for vmstat without any parameters
â bapors
Jan 30 at 13:21
I am not sure. I am just asking for vmstat without any parameters
â bapors
Jan 30 at 13:21
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
vmstat
without parameters shows the average values since reboot. As the swap in / swap out is shown as blocks/second, it's not strange that those are showing 0, if you have a reasonable uptime.
Whatever is now in swap is memory that is in use, but not used since the time it was swapped out due to the overloading of the memory by your process. This is actually a good thing, as many processes have memory that is e.g. only used during startup. Having this swapped out means that you have more free RAM available for processes and buffers/cache.
The reason that in the earlier case, when you did get OOM, afterwards all swapspace was free again shortly after the event is probably because the OOM-causing process had used all the space and after it was stopped all the swapspace was free again.
The only time when you will get OOM is when there is no free swap space, and there is no RAM free (taking into account the buffers/cache, i.e. the "available" column of the free
command).
For the rest you can usually trust Linux's memory management to do the right thing. Only if you have really special requirements due to the sort of load / application you're running can it be necessary to start tuning the memory management.
I mean when swap reaches 0GB in use space ( so it will be all free )
â bapors
Jan 30 at 14:31
OK, I've edited your question a bit to make it a bit clearer. And edited my answer to explain the free swap in the OOM case.
â wurtel
Jan 30 at 15:16
thank you very much for your reply. However, if I got into the swap directly, wouldnt some jobs be flagged to be killed by OMM already? So that I will have a problem when the swap is all free?
â bapors
Jan 31 at 12:37
1
Only if there is no free memory and no free swap will the OOM killer be invoked. Jobs aren't "flagged" to be killed, the OOM killer, when started, looks for the best candidate to kill, which is usually the job that has caused the OOM condition.
â wurtel
Jan 31 at 13:40
I understand..Thank you very much for your informative replies. They helped me a lot.
â bapors
Feb 3 at 19:40
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
vmstat
without parameters shows the average values since reboot. As the swap in / swap out is shown as blocks/second, it's not strange that those are showing 0, if you have a reasonable uptime.
Whatever is now in swap is memory that is in use, but not used since the time it was swapped out due to the overloading of the memory by your process. This is actually a good thing, as many processes have memory that is e.g. only used during startup. Having this swapped out means that you have more free RAM available for processes and buffers/cache.
The reason that in the earlier case, when you did get OOM, afterwards all swapspace was free again shortly after the event is probably because the OOM-causing process had used all the space and after it was stopped all the swapspace was free again.
The only time when you will get OOM is when there is no free swap space, and there is no RAM free (taking into account the buffers/cache, i.e. the "available" column of the free
command).
For the rest you can usually trust Linux's memory management to do the right thing. Only if you have really special requirements due to the sort of load / application you're running can it be necessary to start tuning the memory management.
I mean when swap reaches 0GB in use space ( so it will be all free )
â bapors
Jan 30 at 14:31
OK, I've edited your question a bit to make it a bit clearer. And edited my answer to explain the free swap in the OOM case.
â wurtel
Jan 30 at 15:16
thank you very much for your reply. However, if I got into the swap directly, wouldnt some jobs be flagged to be killed by OMM already? So that I will have a problem when the swap is all free?
â bapors
Jan 31 at 12:37
1
Only if there is no free memory and no free swap will the OOM killer be invoked. Jobs aren't "flagged" to be killed, the OOM killer, when started, looks for the best candidate to kill, which is usually the job that has caused the OOM condition.
â wurtel
Jan 31 at 13:40
I understand..Thank you very much for your informative replies. They helped me a lot.
â bapors
Feb 3 at 19:40
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
vmstat
without parameters shows the average values since reboot. As the swap in / swap out is shown as blocks/second, it's not strange that those are showing 0, if you have a reasonable uptime.
Whatever is now in swap is memory that is in use, but not used since the time it was swapped out due to the overloading of the memory by your process. This is actually a good thing, as many processes have memory that is e.g. only used during startup. Having this swapped out means that you have more free RAM available for processes and buffers/cache.
The reason that in the earlier case, when you did get OOM, afterwards all swapspace was free again shortly after the event is probably because the OOM-causing process had used all the space and after it was stopped all the swapspace was free again.
The only time when you will get OOM is when there is no free swap space, and there is no RAM free (taking into account the buffers/cache, i.e. the "available" column of the free
command).
For the rest you can usually trust Linux's memory management to do the right thing. Only if you have really special requirements due to the sort of load / application you're running can it be necessary to start tuning the memory management.
I mean when swap reaches 0GB in use space ( so it will be all free )
â bapors
Jan 30 at 14:31
OK, I've edited your question a bit to make it a bit clearer. And edited my answer to explain the free swap in the OOM case.
â wurtel
Jan 30 at 15:16
thank you very much for your reply. However, if I got into the swap directly, wouldnt some jobs be flagged to be killed by OMM already? So that I will have a problem when the swap is all free?
â bapors
Jan 31 at 12:37
1
Only if there is no free memory and no free swap will the OOM killer be invoked. Jobs aren't "flagged" to be killed, the OOM killer, when started, looks for the best candidate to kill, which is usually the job that has caused the OOM condition.
â wurtel
Jan 31 at 13:40
I understand..Thank you very much for your informative replies. They helped me a lot.
â bapors
Feb 3 at 19:40
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
vmstat
without parameters shows the average values since reboot. As the swap in / swap out is shown as blocks/second, it's not strange that those are showing 0, if you have a reasonable uptime.
Whatever is now in swap is memory that is in use, but not used since the time it was swapped out due to the overloading of the memory by your process. This is actually a good thing, as many processes have memory that is e.g. only used during startup. Having this swapped out means that you have more free RAM available for processes and buffers/cache.
The reason that in the earlier case, when you did get OOM, afterwards all swapspace was free again shortly after the event is probably because the OOM-causing process had used all the space and after it was stopped all the swapspace was free again.
The only time when you will get OOM is when there is no free swap space, and there is no RAM free (taking into account the buffers/cache, i.e. the "available" column of the free
command).
For the rest you can usually trust Linux's memory management to do the right thing. Only if you have really special requirements due to the sort of load / application you're running can it be necessary to start tuning the memory management.
vmstat
without parameters shows the average values since reboot. As the swap in / swap out is shown as blocks/second, it's not strange that those are showing 0, if you have a reasonable uptime.
Whatever is now in swap is memory that is in use, but not used since the time it was swapped out due to the overloading of the memory by your process. This is actually a good thing, as many processes have memory that is e.g. only used during startup. Having this swapped out means that you have more free RAM available for processes and buffers/cache.
The reason that in the earlier case, when you did get OOM, afterwards all swapspace was free again shortly after the event is probably because the OOM-causing process had used all the space and after it was stopped all the swapspace was free again.
The only time when you will get OOM is when there is no free swap space, and there is no RAM free (taking into account the buffers/cache, i.e. the "available" column of the free
command).
For the rest you can usually trust Linux's memory management to do the right thing. Only if you have really special requirements due to the sort of load / application you're running can it be necessary to start tuning the memory management.
edited Jan 30 at 15:18
answered Jan 30 at 14:27
wurtel
9,18511024
9,18511024
I mean when swap reaches 0GB in use space ( so it will be all free )
â bapors
Jan 30 at 14:31
OK, I've edited your question a bit to make it a bit clearer. And edited my answer to explain the free swap in the OOM case.
â wurtel
Jan 30 at 15:16
thank you very much for your reply. However, if I got into the swap directly, wouldnt some jobs be flagged to be killed by OMM already? So that I will have a problem when the swap is all free?
â bapors
Jan 31 at 12:37
1
Only if there is no free memory and no free swap will the OOM killer be invoked. Jobs aren't "flagged" to be killed, the OOM killer, when started, looks for the best candidate to kill, which is usually the job that has caused the OOM condition.
â wurtel
Jan 31 at 13:40
I understand..Thank you very much for your informative replies. They helped me a lot.
â bapors
Feb 3 at 19:40
add a comment |Â
I mean when swap reaches 0GB in use space ( so it will be all free )
â bapors
Jan 30 at 14:31
OK, I've edited your question a bit to make it a bit clearer. And edited my answer to explain the free swap in the OOM case.
â wurtel
Jan 30 at 15:16
thank you very much for your reply. However, if I got into the swap directly, wouldnt some jobs be flagged to be killed by OMM already? So that I will have a problem when the swap is all free?
â bapors
Jan 31 at 12:37
1
Only if there is no free memory and no free swap will the OOM killer be invoked. Jobs aren't "flagged" to be killed, the OOM killer, when started, looks for the best candidate to kill, which is usually the job that has caused the OOM condition.
â wurtel
Jan 31 at 13:40
I understand..Thank you very much for your informative replies. They helped me a lot.
â bapors
Feb 3 at 19:40
I mean when swap reaches 0GB in use space ( so it will be all free )
â bapors
Jan 30 at 14:31
I mean when swap reaches 0GB in use space ( so it will be all free )
â bapors
Jan 30 at 14:31
OK, I've edited your question a bit to make it a bit clearer. And edited my answer to explain the free swap in the OOM case.
â wurtel
Jan 30 at 15:16
OK, I've edited your question a bit to make it a bit clearer. And edited my answer to explain the free swap in the OOM case.
â wurtel
Jan 30 at 15:16
thank you very much for your reply. However, if I got into the swap directly, wouldnt some jobs be flagged to be killed by OMM already? So that I will have a problem when the swap is all free?
â bapors
Jan 31 at 12:37
thank you very much for your reply. However, if I got into the swap directly, wouldnt some jobs be flagged to be killed by OMM already? So that I will have a problem when the swap is all free?
â bapors
Jan 31 at 12:37
1
1
Only if there is no free memory and no free swap will the OOM killer be invoked. Jobs aren't "flagged" to be killed, the OOM killer, when started, looks for the best candidate to kill, which is usually the job that has caused the OOM condition.
â wurtel
Jan 31 at 13:40
Only if there is no free memory and no free swap will the OOM killer be invoked. Jobs aren't "flagged" to be killed, the OOM killer, when started, looks for the best candidate to kill, which is usually the job that has caused the OOM condition.
â wurtel
Jan 31 at 13:40
I understand..Thank you very much for your informative replies. They helped me a lot.
â bapors
Feb 3 at 19:40
I understand..Thank you very much for your informative replies. They helped me a lot.
â bapors
Feb 3 at 19:40
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f420651%2fswap-is-half-full-but-nothing-is-going-in-or-out-of-swap%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
you seem to have created a duplicate account. to fix, see unix.stackexchange.com/help/merging-accounts
â cas
Jan 30 at 12:06
2
Are you running vmstat with a count/delay?
â Raman Sailopal
Jan 30 at 12:19
I am not sure. I am just asking for vmstat without any parameters
â bapors
Jan 30 at 13:21