egrep with while loop shell script

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I have a list of files in /tmp/drop directory. I have taken the essential element of my question into test script zz.sh. I have taken a part of the script and put it here. These are the files and the lines listed - and when it given to while loop - how does the variable file gets assigned only the file name and not the various other strings in those lines?



Any help would be appreciated and would be helpful to others too.



machine001:/home/aaa999999> ls -l /tmp/drop | grep "2017-01-29" | egrep '.gz$' | tail -10
+ ls -F -l /tmp/drop
+ tail -10
+ grep 2017-01-29
+ egrep .gz$
-rw-r--r-- 1 user1001 user1001 20 Jan 29 2017 pattern101_worker-2_2017-01-29-21:33:13.888.complete.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 user1001 user1001 20 Jan 29 2017 pattern101_worker-2_2017-01-29-21:48:14.632.complete.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 user1001 user1001 20 Jan 29 2017 pattern101_worker-2_2017-01-29-22:03:19.098.complete.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 user1001 user1001 20 Jan 29 2017 pattern101_worker-2_2017-01-29-22:18:19.416.complete.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 user1001 user1001 20 Jan 29 2017 pattern101_worker-2_2017-01-29-22:33:19.878.complete.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 user1001 user1001 20 Jan 29 2017 pattern101_worker-2_2017-01-29-22:48:25.636.complete.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 user1001 user1001 20 Jan 29 2017 pattern101_worker-2_2017-01-29-23:03:26.515.complete.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 user1001 user1001 20 Jan 29 2017 pattern101_worker-2_2017-01-29-23:18:28.279.complete.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 user1001 user1001 20 Jan 29 2017 pattern101_worker-2_2017-01-29-23:33:33.059.complete.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 user1001 user1001 20 Jan 29 2017 pattern101_worker-2_2017-01-29-23:48:33.841.complete.gz
machine001:/home/aaa999999> cat zz.sh
+ cat zz.sh
#!/bin/bash
set -x

DROP_DIR=/tmp/drop
ARCHIVE_DIR=/tmp/arch
YESTERDAY="2017-01-29"
# move from drop dir
ls -1 $DROP_DIR | grep $YESTERDAY | egrep '.gz$' | while read file; do
mv $DROP_DIR/$file $ARCHIVE_DIR
echo 'File name is ' $file
done






share|improve this question






















  • What do you want to do? Looks to me like mv /tmp/drop/*2017-01-29*.gz /tmp/arch?
    – pfnuesel
    Jan 31 at 0:53






  • 4




    In the first case, you have ls -l (letter ell) while in the script it appears to be ls -1 (digit one) - different options, different behaviors. Regardless, please see Why not parse ls?
    – steeldriver
    Jan 31 at 1:01











  • @steeldriver Good catch!
    – G-Man
    Jan 31 at 4:04






  • 2




    for file in "$DROP_DIR/*$YESTERDAY*.gz" ; do ... ; done - parsing ls is not only potentially dangerous, it isn't even necessary. Also, that while read loop is in a pipe subshell, so can't affect the environment or variables of the parent script (see unix.stackexchange.com/questions/9954/… for why).
    – cas
    Jan 31 at 4:58











  • @cas drop those double quotes surrounding the wildcard globs
    – roaima
    Jan 31 at 19:18














up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I have a list of files in /tmp/drop directory. I have taken the essential element of my question into test script zz.sh. I have taken a part of the script and put it here. These are the files and the lines listed - and when it given to while loop - how does the variable file gets assigned only the file name and not the various other strings in those lines?



Any help would be appreciated and would be helpful to others too.



machine001:/home/aaa999999> ls -l /tmp/drop | grep "2017-01-29" | egrep '.gz$' | tail -10
+ ls -F -l /tmp/drop
+ tail -10
+ grep 2017-01-29
+ egrep .gz$
-rw-r--r-- 1 user1001 user1001 20 Jan 29 2017 pattern101_worker-2_2017-01-29-21:33:13.888.complete.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 user1001 user1001 20 Jan 29 2017 pattern101_worker-2_2017-01-29-21:48:14.632.complete.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 user1001 user1001 20 Jan 29 2017 pattern101_worker-2_2017-01-29-22:03:19.098.complete.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 user1001 user1001 20 Jan 29 2017 pattern101_worker-2_2017-01-29-22:18:19.416.complete.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 user1001 user1001 20 Jan 29 2017 pattern101_worker-2_2017-01-29-22:33:19.878.complete.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 user1001 user1001 20 Jan 29 2017 pattern101_worker-2_2017-01-29-22:48:25.636.complete.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 user1001 user1001 20 Jan 29 2017 pattern101_worker-2_2017-01-29-23:03:26.515.complete.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 user1001 user1001 20 Jan 29 2017 pattern101_worker-2_2017-01-29-23:18:28.279.complete.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 user1001 user1001 20 Jan 29 2017 pattern101_worker-2_2017-01-29-23:33:33.059.complete.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 user1001 user1001 20 Jan 29 2017 pattern101_worker-2_2017-01-29-23:48:33.841.complete.gz
machine001:/home/aaa999999> cat zz.sh
+ cat zz.sh
#!/bin/bash
set -x

DROP_DIR=/tmp/drop
ARCHIVE_DIR=/tmp/arch
YESTERDAY="2017-01-29"
# move from drop dir
ls -1 $DROP_DIR | grep $YESTERDAY | egrep '.gz$' | while read file; do
mv $DROP_DIR/$file $ARCHIVE_DIR
echo 'File name is ' $file
done






share|improve this question






















  • What do you want to do? Looks to me like mv /tmp/drop/*2017-01-29*.gz /tmp/arch?
    – pfnuesel
    Jan 31 at 0:53






  • 4




    In the first case, you have ls -l (letter ell) while in the script it appears to be ls -1 (digit one) - different options, different behaviors. Regardless, please see Why not parse ls?
    – steeldriver
    Jan 31 at 1:01











  • @steeldriver Good catch!
    – G-Man
    Jan 31 at 4:04






  • 2




    for file in "$DROP_DIR/*$YESTERDAY*.gz" ; do ... ; done - parsing ls is not only potentially dangerous, it isn't even necessary. Also, that while read loop is in a pipe subshell, so can't affect the environment or variables of the parent script (see unix.stackexchange.com/questions/9954/… for why).
    – cas
    Jan 31 at 4:58











  • @cas drop those double quotes surrounding the wildcard globs
    – roaima
    Jan 31 at 19:18












up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











I have a list of files in /tmp/drop directory. I have taken the essential element of my question into test script zz.sh. I have taken a part of the script and put it here. These are the files and the lines listed - and when it given to while loop - how does the variable file gets assigned only the file name and not the various other strings in those lines?



Any help would be appreciated and would be helpful to others too.



machine001:/home/aaa999999> ls -l /tmp/drop | grep "2017-01-29" | egrep '.gz$' | tail -10
+ ls -F -l /tmp/drop
+ tail -10
+ grep 2017-01-29
+ egrep .gz$
-rw-r--r-- 1 user1001 user1001 20 Jan 29 2017 pattern101_worker-2_2017-01-29-21:33:13.888.complete.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 user1001 user1001 20 Jan 29 2017 pattern101_worker-2_2017-01-29-21:48:14.632.complete.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 user1001 user1001 20 Jan 29 2017 pattern101_worker-2_2017-01-29-22:03:19.098.complete.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 user1001 user1001 20 Jan 29 2017 pattern101_worker-2_2017-01-29-22:18:19.416.complete.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 user1001 user1001 20 Jan 29 2017 pattern101_worker-2_2017-01-29-22:33:19.878.complete.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 user1001 user1001 20 Jan 29 2017 pattern101_worker-2_2017-01-29-22:48:25.636.complete.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 user1001 user1001 20 Jan 29 2017 pattern101_worker-2_2017-01-29-23:03:26.515.complete.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 user1001 user1001 20 Jan 29 2017 pattern101_worker-2_2017-01-29-23:18:28.279.complete.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 user1001 user1001 20 Jan 29 2017 pattern101_worker-2_2017-01-29-23:33:33.059.complete.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 user1001 user1001 20 Jan 29 2017 pattern101_worker-2_2017-01-29-23:48:33.841.complete.gz
machine001:/home/aaa999999> cat zz.sh
+ cat zz.sh
#!/bin/bash
set -x

DROP_DIR=/tmp/drop
ARCHIVE_DIR=/tmp/arch
YESTERDAY="2017-01-29"
# move from drop dir
ls -1 $DROP_DIR | grep $YESTERDAY | egrep '.gz$' | while read file; do
mv $DROP_DIR/$file $ARCHIVE_DIR
echo 'File name is ' $file
done






share|improve this question














I have a list of files in /tmp/drop directory. I have taken the essential element of my question into test script zz.sh. I have taken a part of the script and put it here. These are the files and the lines listed - and when it given to while loop - how does the variable file gets assigned only the file name and not the various other strings in those lines?



Any help would be appreciated and would be helpful to others too.



machine001:/home/aaa999999> ls -l /tmp/drop | grep "2017-01-29" | egrep '.gz$' | tail -10
+ ls -F -l /tmp/drop
+ tail -10
+ grep 2017-01-29
+ egrep .gz$
-rw-r--r-- 1 user1001 user1001 20 Jan 29 2017 pattern101_worker-2_2017-01-29-21:33:13.888.complete.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 user1001 user1001 20 Jan 29 2017 pattern101_worker-2_2017-01-29-21:48:14.632.complete.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 user1001 user1001 20 Jan 29 2017 pattern101_worker-2_2017-01-29-22:03:19.098.complete.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 user1001 user1001 20 Jan 29 2017 pattern101_worker-2_2017-01-29-22:18:19.416.complete.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 user1001 user1001 20 Jan 29 2017 pattern101_worker-2_2017-01-29-22:33:19.878.complete.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 user1001 user1001 20 Jan 29 2017 pattern101_worker-2_2017-01-29-22:48:25.636.complete.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 user1001 user1001 20 Jan 29 2017 pattern101_worker-2_2017-01-29-23:03:26.515.complete.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 user1001 user1001 20 Jan 29 2017 pattern101_worker-2_2017-01-29-23:18:28.279.complete.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 user1001 user1001 20 Jan 29 2017 pattern101_worker-2_2017-01-29-23:33:33.059.complete.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 user1001 user1001 20 Jan 29 2017 pattern101_worker-2_2017-01-29-23:48:33.841.complete.gz
machine001:/home/aaa999999> cat zz.sh
+ cat zz.sh
#!/bin/bash
set -x

DROP_DIR=/tmp/drop
ARCHIVE_DIR=/tmp/arch
YESTERDAY="2017-01-29"
# move from drop dir
ls -1 $DROP_DIR | grep $YESTERDAY | egrep '.gz$' | while read file; do
mv $DROP_DIR/$file $ARCHIVE_DIR
echo 'File name is ' $file
done








share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jan 31 at 9:11









Yaron

3,19421027




3,19421027










asked Jan 31 at 0:35









Venkat M

61




61











  • What do you want to do? Looks to me like mv /tmp/drop/*2017-01-29*.gz /tmp/arch?
    – pfnuesel
    Jan 31 at 0:53






  • 4




    In the first case, you have ls -l (letter ell) while in the script it appears to be ls -1 (digit one) - different options, different behaviors. Regardless, please see Why not parse ls?
    – steeldriver
    Jan 31 at 1:01











  • @steeldriver Good catch!
    – G-Man
    Jan 31 at 4:04






  • 2




    for file in "$DROP_DIR/*$YESTERDAY*.gz" ; do ... ; done - parsing ls is not only potentially dangerous, it isn't even necessary. Also, that while read loop is in a pipe subshell, so can't affect the environment or variables of the parent script (see unix.stackexchange.com/questions/9954/… for why).
    – cas
    Jan 31 at 4:58











  • @cas drop those double quotes surrounding the wildcard globs
    – roaima
    Jan 31 at 19:18
















  • What do you want to do? Looks to me like mv /tmp/drop/*2017-01-29*.gz /tmp/arch?
    – pfnuesel
    Jan 31 at 0:53






  • 4




    In the first case, you have ls -l (letter ell) while in the script it appears to be ls -1 (digit one) - different options, different behaviors. Regardless, please see Why not parse ls?
    – steeldriver
    Jan 31 at 1:01











  • @steeldriver Good catch!
    – G-Man
    Jan 31 at 4:04






  • 2




    for file in "$DROP_DIR/*$YESTERDAY*.gz" ; do ... ; done - parsing ls is not only potentially dangerous, it isn't even necessary. Also, that while read loop is in a pipe subshell, so can't affect the environment or variables of the parent script (see unix.stackexchange.com/questions/9954/… for why).
    – cas
    Jan 31 at 4:58











  • @cas drop those double quotes surrounding the wildcard globs
    – roaima
    Jan 31 at 19:18















What do you want to do? Looks to me like mv /tmp/drop/*2017-01-29*.gz /tmp/arch?
– pfnuesel
Jan 31 at 0:53




What do you want to do? Looks to me like mv /tmp/drop/*2017-01-29*.gz /tmp/arch?
– pfnuesel
Jan 31 at 0:53




4




4




In the first case, you have ls -l (letter ell) while in the script it appears to be ls -1 (digit one) - different options, different behaviors. Regardless, please see Why not parse ls?
– steeldriver
Jan 31 at 1:01





In the first case, you have ls -l (letter ell) while in the script it appears to be ls -1 (digit one) - different options, different behaviors. Regardless, please see Why not parse ls?
– steeldriver
Jan 31 at 1:01













@steeldriver Good catch!
– G-Man
Jan 31 at 4:04




@steeldriver Good catch!
– G-Man
Jan 31 at 4:04




2




2




for file in "$DROP_DIR/*$YESTERDAY*.gz" ; do ... ; done - parsing ls is not only potentially dangerous, it isn't even necessary. Also, that while read loop is in a pipe subshell, so can't affect the environment or variables of the parent script (see unix.stackexchange.com/questions/9954/… for why).
– cas
Jan 31 at 4:58





for file in "$DROP_DIR/*$YESTERDAY*.gz" ; do ... ; done - parsing ls is not only potentially dangerous, it isn't even necessary. Also, that while read loop is in a pipe subshell, so can't affect the environment or variables of the parent script (see unix.stackexchange.com/questions/9954/… for why).
– cas
Jan 31 at 4:58













@cas drop those double quotes surrounding the wildcard globs
– roaima
Jan 31 at 19:18




@cas drop those double quotes surrounding the wildcard globs
– roaima
Jan 31 at 19:18










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote













ls -1 prints just the filenames. ls -l prints a bunch of other stuff, too. The other is the number one, the other a lowercase letter el.



Though the -1 is unnecessary here, since if the output is redirected to a pipe, the "one-column" mode is implied.



But really, you don't need the ls and the pipe here, at all. The loop can be replaced with just:



for file in "$DROP_DIR/"*"$YESTERDAY"*.gz ; do 
mv "$file" "$ARCHIVE_DIR"
echo "File name is $file#$DROP_DIR/"
done


See also: ParsingLs on Greg's Bash wiki.






share|improve this answer



























    up vote
    0
    down vote













    Suggestion using GNU date:



    yesterday=$( date -d yesterday +%F )
    drop_dir=/tmp/drop
    archive_dir=/tmp/arch

    mkdir -p "$archive_dir"

    mv -f "$drop_dir"/*"$yesterday"*.gz "$archive_dir"


    Here, "$drop_dir"/*"$yesterday"*.gz will expand to all files matching the given pattern. This will work as long as the pattern expand to several thousands of characters, in which case the shell will complain with "Argument list too long".



    Or, if you really want to do looping to output each filename as they are moved (only the mv command from above is changed to the following):



    for name in "$drop_dir"/*"$yesterday"*.gz; do
    [ -f "$name" ] || continue
    mv "$name" "$archive_dir"
    printf 'Moved "%s"n' "$name"
    done


    Here, the for loop will iterate over the same names as was used in the previous variation, but one by one. Each name will be held in $name (which includes the directory name). If there were no files matching the pattern, the pattern will remain unexpanded. This is why we do an explicit test to make sure that $name really corresponds to an existing file before moving it.



    Or, with find:



    find "$drop_dir" -maxdepth 1 -type f -name "*$yesterday*.gz" 
    -print -exec mv "$archive_dir" ';'


    Here, find will pick up the names from $drop_dir that corresponds to regular files (-type f) and that matches the pattern given to -name. For each such name, mv is called to move the file into tho destination folder. Before calling mv though, -print will list the filename (including path) on the terminal.



    The -maxdepth 1 option stops find from recursing into subfolders of $drop_dir.






    share|improve this answer





























      up vote
      -1
      down vote













      Your question isn't too clear to me, but I think what you seem to be looking for is the -o option to your egrep statement:



       egrep -o "[^[:space:]]+.gz$"


      The -o option (--only-matching) causes egrep to only output the matching portion of matching lines. The [^[:space:]] matches anything not a space character.






      share|improve this answer






















      • that would print just .gz, which isn't likely to be very useful.
        – ilkkachu
        Jan 31 at 14:32










      • @ilkkachu - Thanks. Corrected.
        – user1404316
        Jan 31 at 17:14










      Your Answer







      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "106"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: false,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );








       

      draft saved


      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f420833%2fegrep-with-while-loop-shell-script%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest






























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      2
      down vote













      ls -1 prints just the filenames. ls -l prints a bunch of other stuff, too. The other is the number one, the other a lowercase letter el.



      Though the -1 is unnecessary here, since if the output is redirected to a pipe, the "one-column" mode is implied.



      But really, you don't need the ls and the pipe here, at all. The loop can be replaced with just:



      for file in "$DROP_DIR/"*"$YESTERDAY"*.gz ; do 
      mv "$file" "$ARCHIVE_DIR"
      echo "File name is $file#$DROP_DIR/"
      done


      See also: ParsingLs on Greg's Bash wiki.






      share|improve this answer
























        up vote
        2
        down vote













        ls -1 prints just the filenames. ls -l prints a bunch of other stuff, too. The other is the number one, the other a lowercase letter el.



        Though the -1 is unnecessary here, since if the output is redirected to a pipe, the "one-column" mode is implied.



        But really, you don't need the ls and the pipe here, at all. The loop can be replaced with just:



        for file in "$DROP_DIR/"*"$YESTERDAY"*.gz ; do 
        mv "$file" "$ARCHIVE_DIR"
        echo "File name is $file#$DROP_DIR/"
        done


        See also: ParsingLs on Greg's Bash wiki.






        share|improve this answer






















          up vote
          2
          down vote










          up vote
          2
          down vote









          ls -1 prints just the filenames. ls -l prints a bunch of other stuff, too. The other is the number one, the other a lowercase letter el.



          Though the -1 is unnecessary here, since if the output is redirected to a pipe, the "one-column" mode is implied.



          But really, you don't need the ls and the pipe here, at all. The loop can be replaced with just:



          for file in "$DROP_DIR/"*"$YESTERDAY"*.gz ; do 
          mv "$file" "$ARCHIVE_DIR"
          echo "File name is $file#$DROP_DIR/"
          done


          See also: ParsingLs on Greg's Bash wiki.






          share|improve this answer












          ls -1 prints just the filenames. ls -l prints a bunch of other stuff, too. The other is the number one, the other a lowercase letter el.



          Though the -1 is unnecessary here, since if the output is redirected to a pipe, the "one-column" mode is implied.



          But really, you don't need the ls and the pipe here, at all. The loop can be replaced with just:



          for file in "$DROP_DIR/"*"$YESTERDAY"*.gz ; do 
          mv "$file" "$ARCHIVE_DIR"
          echo "File name is $file#$DROP_DIR/"
          done


          See also: ParsingLs on Greg's Bash wiki.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Jan 31 at 14:31









          ilkkachu

          49.8k674137




          49.8k674137






















              up vote
              0
              down vote













              Suggestion using GNU date:



              yesterday=$( date -d yesterday +%F )
              drop_dir=/tmp/drop
              archive_dir=/tmp/arch

              mkdir -p "$archive_dir"

              mv -f "$drop_dir"/*"$yesterday"*.gz "$archive_dir"


              Here, "$drop_dir"/*"$yesterday"*.gz will expand to all files matching the given pattern. This will work as long as the pattern expand to several thousands of characters, in which case the shell will complain with "Argument list too long".



              Or, if you really want to do looping to output each filename as they are moved (only the mv command from above is changed to the following):



              for name in "$drop_dir"/*"$yesterday"*.gz; do
              [ -f "$name" ] || continue
              mv "$name" "$archive_dir"
              printf 'Moved "%s"n' "$name"
              done


              Here, the for loop will iterate over the same names as was used in the previous variation, but one by one. Each name will be held in $name (which includes the directory name). If there were no files matching the pattern, the pattern will remain unexpanded. This is why we do an explicit test to make sure that $name really corresponds to an existing file before moving it.



              Or, with find:



              find "$drop_dir" -maxdepth 1 -type f -name "*$yesterday*.gz" 
              -print -exec mv "$archive_dir" ';'


              Here, find will pick up the names from $drop_dir that corresponds to regular files (-type f) and that matches the pattern given to -name. For each such name, mv is called to move the file into tho destination folder. Before calling mv though, -print will list the filename (including path) on the terminal.



              The -maxdepth 1 option stops find from recursing into subfolders of $drop_dir.






              share|improve this answer


























                up vote
                0
                down vote













                Suggestion using GNU date:



                yesterday=$( date -d yesterday +%F )
                drop_dir=/tmp/drop
                archive_dir=/tmp/arch

                mkdir -p "$archive_dir"

                mv -f "$drop_dir"/*"$yesterday"*.gz "$archive_dir"


                Here, "$drop_dir"/*"$yesterday"*.gz will expand to all files matching the given pattern. This will work as long as the pattern expand to several thousands of characters, in which case the shell will complain with "Argument list too long".



                Or, if you really want to do looping to output each filename as they are moved (only the mv command from above is changed to the following):



                for name in "$drop_dir"/*"$yesterday"*.gz; do
                [ -f "$name" ] || continue
                mv "$name" "$archive_dir"
                printf 'Moved "%s"n' "$name"
                done


                Here, the for loop will iterate over the same names as was used in the previous variation, but one by one. Each name will be held in $name (which includes the directory name). If there were no files matching the pattern, the pattern will remain unexpanded. This is why we do an explicit test to make sure that $name really corresponds to an existing file before moving it.



                Or, with find:



                find "$drop_dir" -maxdepth 1 -type f -name "*$yesterday*.gz" 
                -print -exec mv "$archive_dir" ';'


                Here, find will pick up the names from $drop_dir that corresponds to regular files (-type f) and that matches the pattern given to -name. For each such name, mv is called to move the file into tho destination folder. Before calling mv though, -print will list the filename (including path) on the terminal.



                The -maxdepth 1 option stops find from recursing into subfolders of $drop_dir.






                share|improve this answer
























                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote









                  Suggestion using GNU date:



                  yesterday=$( date -d yesterday +%F )
                  drop_dir=/tmp/drop
                  archive_dir=/tmp/arch

                  mkdir -p "$archive_dir"

                  mv -f "$drop_dir"/*"$yesterday"*.gz "$archive_dir"


                  Here, "$drop_dir"/*"$yesterday"*.gz will expand to all files matching the given pattern. This will work as long as the pattern expand to several thousands of characters, in which case the shell will complain with "Argument list too long".



                  Or, if you really want to do looping to output each filename as they are moved (only the mv command from above is changed to the following):



                  for name in "$drop_dir"/*"$yesterday"*.gz; do
                  [ -f "$name" ] || continue
                  mv "$name" "$archive_dir"
                  printf 'Moved "%s"n' "$name"
                  done


                  Here, the for loop will iterate over the same names as was used in the previous variation, but one by one. Each name will be held in $name (which includes the directory name). If there were no files matching the pattern, the pattern will remain unexpanded. This is why we do an explicit test to make sure that $name really corresponds to an existing file before moving it.



                  Or, with find:



                  find "$drop_dir" -maxdepth 1 -type f -name "*$yesterday*.gz" 
                  -print -exec mv "$archive_dir" ';'


                  Here, find will pick up the names from $drop_dir that corresponds to regular files (-type f) and that matches the pattern given to -name. For each such name, mv is called to move the file into tho destination folder. Before calling mv though, -print will list the filename (including path) on the terminal.



                  The -maxdepth 1 option stops find from recursing into subfolders of $drop_dir.






                  share|improve this answer














                  Suggestion using GNU date:



                  yesterday=$( date -d yesterday +%F )
                  drop_dir=/tmp/drop
                  archive_dir=/tmp/arch

                  mkdir -p "$archive_dir"

                  mv -f "$drop_dir"/*"$yesterday"*.gz "$archive_dir"


                  Here, "$drop_dir"/*"$yesterday"*.gz will expand to all files matching the given pattern. This will work as long as the pattern expand to several thousands of characters, in which case the shell will complain with "Argument list too long".



                  Or, if you really want to do looping to output each filename as they are moved (only the mv command from above is changed to the following):



                  for name in "$drop_dir"/*"$yesterday"*.gz; do
                  [ -f "$name" ] || continue
                  mv "$name" "$archive_dir"
                  printf 'Moved "%s"n' "$name"
                  done


                  Here, the for loop will iterate over the same names as was used in the previous variation, but one by one. Each name will be held in $name (which includes the directory name). If there were no files matching the pattern, the pattern will remain unexpanded. This is why we do an explicit test to make sure that $name really corresponds to an existing file before moving it.



                  Or, with find:



                  find "$drop_dir" -maxdepth 1 -type f -name "*$yesterday*.gz" 
                  -print -exec mv "$archive_dir" ';'


                  Here, find will pick up the names from $drop_dir that corresponds to regular files (-type f) and that matches the pattern given to -name. For each such name, mv is called to move the file into tho destination folder. Before calling mv though, -print will list the filename (including path) on the terminal.



                  The -maxdepth 1 option stops find from recursing into subfolders of $drop_dir.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited Feb 19 at 14:49

























                  answered Feb 19 at 14:40









                  Kusalananda

                  103k13202318




                  103k13202318




















                      up vote
                      -1
                      down vote













                      Your question isn't too clear to me, but I think what you seem to be looking for is the -o option to your egrep statement:



                       egrep -o "[^[:space:]]+.gz$"


                      The -o option (--only-matching) causes egrep to only output the matching portion of matching lines. The [^[:space:]] matches anything not a space character.






                      share|improve this answer






















                      • that would print just .gz, which isn't likely to be very useful.
                        – ilkkachu
                        Jan 31 at 14:32










                      • @ilkkachu - Thanks. Corrected.
                        – user1404316
                        Jan 31 at 17:14














                      up vote
                      -1
                      down vote













                      Your question isn't too clear to me, but I think what you seem to be looking for is the -o option to your egrep statement:



                       egrep -o "[^[:space:]]+.gz$"


                      The -o option (--only-matching) causes egrep to only output the matching portion of matching lines. The [^[:space:]] matches anything not a space character.






                      share|improve this answer






















                      • that would print just .gz, which isn't likely to be very useful.
                        – ilkkachu
                        Jan 31 at 14:32










                      • @ilkkachu - Thanks. Corrected.
                        – user1404316
                        Jan 31 at 17:14












                      up vote
                      -1
                      down vote










                      up vote
                      -1
                      down vote









                      Your question isn't too clear to me, but I think what you seem to be looking for is the -o option to your egrep statement:



                       egrep -o "[^[:space:]]+.gz$"


                      The -o option (--only-matching) causes egrep to only output the matching portion of matching lines. The [^[:space:]] matches anything not a space character.






                      share|improve this answer














                      Your question isn't too clear to me, but I think what you seem to be looking for is the -o option to your egrep statement:



                       egrep -o "[^[:space:]]+.gz$"


                      The -o option (--only-matching) causes egrep to only output the matching portion of matching lines. The [^[:space:]] matches anything not a space character.







                      share|improve this answer














                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited Jan 31 at 17:14

























                      answered Jan 31 at 11:28









                      user1404316

                      2,314520




                      2,314520











                      • that would print just .gz, which isn't likely to be very useful.
                        – ilkkachu
                        Jan 31 at 14:32










                      • @ilkkachu - Thanks. Corrected.
                        – user1404316
                        Jan 31 at 17:14
















                      • that would print just .gz, which isn't likely to be very useful.
                        – ilkkachu
                        Jan 31 at 14:32










                      • @ilkkachu - Thanks. Corrected.
                        – user1404316
                        Jan 31 at 17:14















                      that would print just .gz, which isn't likely to be very useful.
                      – ilkkachu
                      Jan 31 at 14:32




                      that would print just .gz, which isn't likely to be very useful.
                      – ilkkachu
                      Jan 31 at 14:32












                      @ilkkachu - Thanks. Corrected.
                      – user1404316
                      Jan 31 at 17:14




                      @ilkkachu - Thanks. Corrected.
                      – user1404316
                      Jan 31 at 17:14












                       

                      draft saved


                      draft discarded


























                       


                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f420833%2fegrep-with-while-loop-shell-script%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest













































































                      Popular posts from this blog

                      How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

                      Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

                      How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?