How does FIO benchmark set IOdepth?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
NOTE: My question stems from this other U&L Q - What exactly is iodepth in fio?
I want to know how internally FIO sets I/O depth.âÂÂI.e., one of the parameters we submit to FIO when we run it is "IOdepth" (--iodepth=
). How does FIO internally control this parameter with the underlying operating system?
Here is an example of the command that we use to run FIO benchmark:
$ sudo fio --filename=/dev/nvme0n1 --direct=1 --rw=randwrite --refill_buffers
--norandommap --randrepeat=0 --ioengine=libaio --bs=8K --iodepth=72 --numjobs=256
--time_based --runtime=600 --allow_mounted_write=1 --group_reporting --name=benchtest
benchtest: (g=0): rw=randwrite, bs=8K-8K/8K-8K/8K-8K, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=72
As in this example, the value of "iodepth" can be changed. Accordingly, fio is passing this value to the operating system. So how does FIO do this?
If you want an actual problem to be solved:
if I want to write a benchmark program like fio,
how would I control the IO queue depth?
io system-calls parameter benchmark kernel-parameters
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
NOTE: My question stems from this other U&L Q - What exactly is iodepth in fio?
I want to know how internally FIO sets I/O depth.âÂÂI.e., one of the parameters we submit to FIO when we run it is "IOdepth" (--iodepth=
). How does FIO internally control this parameter with the underlying operating system?
Here is an example of the command that we use to run FIO benchmark:
$ sudo fio --filename=/dev/nvme0n1 --direct=1 --rw=randwrite --refill_buffers
--norandommap --randrepeat=0 --ioengine=libaio --bs=8K --iodepth=72 --numjobs=256
--time_based --runtime=600 --allow_mounted_write=1 --group_reporting --name=benchtest
benchtest: (g=0): rw=randwrite, bs=8K-8K/8K-8K/8K-8K, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=72
As in this example, the value of "iodepth" can be changed. Accordingly, fio is passing this value to the operating system. So how does FIO do this?
If you want an actual problem to be solved:
if I want to write a benchmark program like fio,
how would I control the IO queue depth?
io system-calls parameter benchmark kernel-parameters
Welcome on the Unix SE! I tried to make your question more acceptable. Give more context, details. Explain, what you want to know what is not on the another question.
â peterh
yesterday
Please read the response that I've added to this linked Q - unix.stackexchange.com/questions/459045/â¦. That Q was posted to the Flexible I/O Testers forum and the response looks to cover your Q as well.
â slmâ¦
yesterday
@slm I have checked your comment there. However, I have the same question as one of the guys commented there. If it means number of ios at a given time, then doesn't the numjobs parameter do the same thing.
â ahmadi
yesterday
Thanks a lot @peterh :).
â ahmadi
yesterday
@ahmadi - I would ask your Q on that forum and report back here.
â slmâ¦
yesterday
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
NOTE: My question stems from this other U&L Q - What exactly is iodepth in fio?
I want to know how internally FIO sets I/O depth.âÂÂI.e., one of the parameters we submit to FIO when we run it is "IOdepth" (--iodepth=
). How does FIO internally control this parameter with the underlying operating system?
Here is an example of the command that we use to run FIO benchmark:
$ sudo fio --filename=/dev/nvme0n1 --direct=1 --rw=randwrite --refill_buffers
--norandommap --randrepeat=0 --ioengine=libaio --bs=8K --iodepth=72 --numjobs=256
--time_based --runtime=600 --allow_mounted_write=1 --group_reporting --name=benchtest
benchtest: (g=0): rw=randwrite, bs=8K-8K/8K-8K/8K-8K, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=72
As in this example, the value of "iodepth" can be changed. Accordingly, fio is passing this value to the operating system. So how does FIO do this?
If you want an actual problem to be solved:
if I want to write a benchmark program like fio,
how would I control the IO queue depth?
io system-calls parameter benchmark kernel-parameters
NOTE: My question stems from this other U&L Q - What exactly is iodepth in fio?
I want to know how internally FIO sets I/O depth.âÂÂI.e., one of the parameters we submit to FIO when we run it is "IOdepth" (--iodepth=
). How does FIO internally control this parameter with the underlying operating system?
Here is an example of the command that we use to run FIO benchmark:
$ sudo fio --filename=/dev/nvme0n1 --direct=1 --rw=randwrite --refill_buffers
--norandommap --randrepeat=0 --ioengine=libaio --bs=8K --iodepth=72 --numjobs=256
--time_based --runtime=600 --allow_mounted_write=1 --group_reporting --name=benchtest
benchtest: (g=0): rw=randwrite, bs=8K-8K/8K-8K/8K-8K, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=72
As in this example, the value of "iodepth" can be changed. Accordingly, fio is passing this value to the operating system. So how does FIO do this?
If you want an actual problem to be solved:
if I want to write a benchmark program like fio,
how would I control the IO queue depth?
io system-calls parameter benchmark kernel-parameters
edited yesterday
slmâ¦
232k65479648
232k65479648
asked 2 days ago
ahmadi
63
63
Welcome on the Unix SE! I tried to make your question more acceptable. Give more context, details. Explain, what you want to know what is not on the another question.
â peterh
yesterday
Please read the response that I've added to this linked Q - unix.stackexchange.com/questions/459045/â¦. That Q was posted to the Flexible I/O Testers forum and the response looks to cover your Q as well.
â slmâ¦
yesterday
@slm I have checked your comment there. However, I have the same question as one of the guys commented there. If it means number of ios at a given time, then doesn't the numjobs parameter do the same thing.
â ahmadi
yesterday
Thanks a lot @peterh :).
â ahmadi
yesterday
@ahmadi - I would ask your Q on that forum and report back here.
â slmâ¦
yesterday
add a comment |Â
Welcome on the Unix SE! I tried to make your question more acceptable. Give more context, details. Explain, what you want to know what is not on the another question.
â peterh
yesterday
Please read the response that I've added to this linked Q - unix.stackexchange.com/questions/459045/â¦. That Q was posted to the Flexible I/O Testers forum and the response looks to cover your Q as well.
â slmâ¦
yesterday
@slm I have checked your comment there. However, I have the same question as one of the guys commented there. If it means number of ios at a given time, then doesn't the numjobs parameter do the same thing.
â ahmadi
yesterday
Thanks a lot @peterh :).
â ahmadi
yesterday
@ahmadi - I would ask your Q on that forum and report back here.
â slmâ¦
yesterday
Welcome on the Unix SE! I tried to make your question more acceptable. Give more context, details. Explain, what you want to know what is not on the another question.
â peterh
yesterday
Welcome on the Unix SE! I tried to make your question more acceptable. Give more context, details. Explain, what you want to know what is not on the another question.
â peterh
yesterday
Please read the response that I've added to this linked Q - unix.stackexchange.com/questions/459045/â¦. That Q was posted to the Flexible I/O Testers forum and the response looks to cover your Q as well.
â slmâ¦
yesterday
Please read the response that I've added to this linked Q - unix.stackexchange.com/questions/459045/â¦. That Q was posted to the Flexible I/O Testers forum and the response looks to cover your Q as well.
â slmâ¦
yesterday
@slm I have checked your comment there. However, I have the same question as one of the guys commented there. If it means number of ios at a given time, then doesn't the numjobs parameter do the same thing.
â ahmadi
yesterday
@slm I have checked your comment there. However, I have the same question as one of the guys commented there. If it means number of ios at a given time, then doesn't the numjobs parameter do the same thing.
â ahmadi
yesterday
Thanks a lot @peterh :).
â ahmadi
yesterday
Thanks a lot @peterh :).
â ahmadi
yesterday
@ahmadi - I would ask your Q on that forum and report back here.
â slmâ¦
yesterday
@ahmadi - I would ask your Q on that forum and report back here.
â slmâ¦
yesterday
add a comment |Â
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f460491%2fhow-does-fio-benchmark-set-iodepth%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Welcome on the Unix SE! I tried to make your question more acceptable. Give more context, details. Explain, what you want to know what is not on the another question.
â peterh
yesterday
Please read the response that I've added to this linked Q - unix.stackexchange.com/questions/459045/â¦. That Q was posted to the Flexible I/O Testers forum and the response looks to cover your Q as well.
â slmâ¦
yesterday
@slm I have checked your comment there. However, I have the same question as one of the guys commented there. If it means number of ios at a given time, then doesn't the numjobs parameter do the same thing.
â ahmadi
yesterday
Thanks a lot @peterh :).
â ahmadi
yesterday
@ahmadi - I would ask your Q on that forum and report back here.
â slmâ¦
yesterday