Error installing perl-doc: bug or poor usage?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I encountered the following error while trying to install perl-doc:



$ su
Password:
# apt-get install perl-doc


<snip>



Get:1 http://ftp.br.debian.org/debian testing/main amd64 perl-doc all 5.26.2-6 [7,429 kB]
Fetched 7,429 kB in 4s (1,721 kB/s) 
dpkg: warning: 'ldconfig' not found in PATH or not executable
dpkg: warning: 'start-stop-daemon' not found in PATH or not executable
dpkg: error: 2 expected programs not found in PATH or not executable
Note: root's PATH should usually contain /usr/local/sbin, /usr/sbin and /sbin
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (2)


Granted, the solution was obvious:



# exit
$ su -
Password:
# apt-get install perl-doc


However, I have always installed with a simple su. And the perl-doc installation has always been pretty trivial.



My question is: does the package requiring ldconfig to be in PATH is reasonable (therefore my mistake and I need to get used to su - from now on) or is this bad practice from the packaging process and therefore a bug?




debian packaging




share|improve this question

























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    I encountered the following error while trying to install perl-doc:



    $ su
    Password:
    # apt-get install perl-doc


    <snip>



    Get:1 http://ftp.br.debian.org/debian testing/main amd64 perl-doc all 5.26.2-6 [7,429 kB]
    Fetched 7,429 kB in 4s (1,721 kB/s) 
    dpkg: warning: 'ldconfig' not found in PATH or not executable
    dpkg: warning: 'start-stop-daemon' not found in PATH or not executable
    dpkg: error: 2 expected programs not found in PATH or not executable
    Note: root's PATH should usually contain /usr/local/sbin, /usr/sbin and /sbin
    E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (2)


    Granted, the solution was obvious:



    # exit
    $ su -
    Password:
    # apt-get install perl-doc


    However, I have always installed with a simple su. And the perl-doc installation has always been pretty trivial.



    My question is: does the package requiring ldconfig to be in PATH is reasonable (therefore my mistake and I need to get used to su - from now on) or is this bad practice from the packaging process and therefore a bug?




    debian packaging




    share|improve this question





















      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      I encountered the following error while trying to install perl-doc:



      $ su
      Password:
      # apt-get install perl-doc


      <snip>



      Get:1 http://ftp.br.debian.org/debian testing/main amd64 perl-doc all 5.26.2-6 [7,429 kB]
      Fetched 7,429 kB in 4s (1,721 kB/s) 
      dpkg: warning: 'ldconfig' not found in PATH or not executable
      dpkg: warning: 'start-stop-daemon' not found in PATH or not executable
      dpkg: error: 2 expected programs not found in PATH or not executable
      Note: root's PATH should usually contain /usr/local/sbin, /usr/sbin and /sbin
      E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (2)


      Granted, the solution was obvious:



      # exit
      $ su -
      Password:
      # apt-get install perl-doc


      However, I have always installed with a simple su. And the perl-doc installation has always been pretty trivial.



      My question is: does the package requiring ldconfig to be in PATH is reasonable (therefore my mistake and I need to get used to su - from now on) or is this bad practice from the packaging process and therefore a bug?




      debian packaging




      share|improve this question











      I encountered the following error while trying to install perl-doc:



      $ su
      Password:
      # apt-get install perl-doc


      <snip>



      Get:1 http://ftp.br.debian.org/debian testing/main amd64 perl-doc all 5.26.2-6 [7,429 kB]
      Fetched 7,429 kB in 4s (1,721 kB/s) 
      dpkg: warning: 'ldconfig' not found in PATH or not executable
      dpkg: warning: 'start-stop-daemon' not found in PATH or not executable
      dpkg: error: 2 expected programs not found in PATH or not executable
      Note: root's PATH should usually contain /usr/local/sbin, /usr/sbin and /sbin
      E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (2)


      Granted, the solution was obvious:



      # exit
      $ su -
      Password:
      # apt-get install perl-doc


      However, I have always installed with a simple su. And the perl-doc installation has always been pretty trivial.



      My question is: does the package requiring ldconfig to be in PATH is reasonable (therefore my mistake and I need to get used to su - from now on) or is this bad practice from the packaging process and therefore a bug?





      debian packaging





      share|improve this question










      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question









      asked yesterday









      giusti

      600217




      600217

























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer







          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "106"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f460593%2ferror-installing-perl-doc-bug-or-poor-usage%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






















          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes










           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f460593%2ferror-installing-perl-doc-bug-or-poor-usage%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest
































































          -

          Popular posts from this blog

          How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

          Image
          Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this question asked Sep 26 at 0:12 ToanLuong 49 9 add a comment  |  up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this question asked Se
          Read more

          Bahrain

          Image
          For other uses, see Bahrain (disambiguation). Sovereign island state in the Persian Gulf Kingdom of Bahrain مملكة البحرين   (Arabic) Mamlakat al-Baḥrayn Flag Coat of arms Anthem:  نشيد البحرين الوطني Bahrainona Our Bahrain Location of   Bahrain    (circled in red) Capital and largest city Manama 26°13′N 50°35′E  /  26.217°N 50.583°E  / 26.217; 50.583 Official languages Arabic Ethnic groups (2010 [1] ) 50.7% Arab (46% Bahrani, 4.7% other Arabs) 45.5% Asian 1% European 1.2% Others Religion Islam Demonym(s) Bahraini Government Unitary constitutional monarchy • King Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa • Crown Prince Salman bin Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa • Prime Minister Khalifa bin Salman Al Khalifa Legislature National Assembly • Upper house Consultative Council • Lower house Council of Representatives Independence • Declared Independence [2] 14 August 1971 • from United Kingdom [1] 15 August 1971 • Admitted to the United Nations 21 September 1971 • Kingdom of Bahrain 14 February 2002
          Read more

          Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay

          Image
          Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 0 down vote favorite I am trying to setup postfix to relay all mail generated on the local machine via SMTP to a mailgun relay. I have used the mailgun relay before with success on an ubuntu server, but I am migrating to a Centos 7 server which I will be running in FIPS mode. There error log is below, slightly sanitized. I have a small enough network that I choose to have each machine reach out to mailgun individually (this the loopback-only, 127.0.0.0/8 restrictions) and no firewall open port allowing smtp in to the machine. I assume the FIPS mode (and with it disabling of MD5) is causing problems, but I don't know how to overcome it or if it is even possible for tls_fprint to use some supported hash such as sha256 or sha512. However, the relay=none is slightly concerning since I have relayhost set, but perhaps that is because the smtp process is failing? Any help would be appreciated! postconf -n: alias_database = hash:/etc/alia
          Read more