Error installing perl-doc: bug or poor usage?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I encountered the following error while trying to install perl-doc:



$ su
Password:
# apt-get install perl-doc


<snip>



Get:1 http://ftp.br.debian.org/debian testing/main amd64 perl-doc all 5.26.2-6 [7,429 kB]
Fetched 7,429 kB in 4s (1,721 kB/s) 
dpkg: warning: 'ldconfig' not found in PATH or not executable
dpkg: warning: 'start-stop-daemon' not found in PATH or not executable
dpkg: error: 2 expected programs not found in PATH or not executable
Note: root's PATH should usually contain /usr/local/sbin, /usr/sbin and /sbin
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (2)


Granted, the solution was obvious:



# exit
$ su -
Password:
# apt-get install perl-doc


However, I have always installed with a simple su. And the perl-doc installation has always been pretty trivial.



My question is: does the package requiring ldconfig to be in PATH is reasonable (therefore my mistake and I need to get used to su - from now on) or is this bad practice from the packaging process and therefore a bug?




debian packaging




share|improve this question

























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    I encountered the following error while trying to install perl-doc:



    $ su
    Password:
    # apt-get install perl-doc


    <snip>



    Get:1 http://ftp.br.debian.org/debian testing/main amd64 perl-doc all 5.26.2-6 [7,429 kB]
    Fetched 7,429 kB in 4s (1,721 kB/s) 
    dpkg: warning: 'ldconfig' not found in PATH or not executable
    dpkg: warning: 'start-stop-daemon' not found in PATH or not executable
    dpkg: error: 2 expected programs not found in PATH or not executable
    Note: root's PATH should usually contain /usr/local/sbin, /usr/sbin and /sbin
    E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (2)


    Granted, the solution was obvious:



    # exit
    $ su -
    Password:
    # apt-get install perl-doc


    However, I have always installed with a simple su. And the perl-doc installation has always been pretty trivial.



    My question is: does the package requiring ldconfig to be in PATH is reasonable (therefore my mistake and I need to get used to su - from now on) or is this bad practice from the packaging process and therefore a bug?




    debian packaging




    share|improve this question





















      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      I encountered the following error while trying to install perl-doc:



      $ su
      Password:
      # apt-get install perl-doc


      <snip>



      Get:1 http://ftp.br.debian.org/debian testing/main amd64 perl-doc all 5.26.2-6 [7,429 kB]
      Fetched 7,429 kB in 4s (1,721 kB/s) 
      dpkg: warning: 'ldconfig' not found in PATH or not executable
      dpkg: warning: 'start-stop-daemon' not found in PATH or not executable
      dpkg: error: 2 expected programs not found in PATH or not executable
      Note: root's PATH should usually contain /usr/local/sbin, /usr/sbin and /sbin
      E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (2)


      Granted, the solution was obvious:



      # exit
      $ su -
      Password:
      # apt-get install perl-doc


      However, I have always installed with a simple su. And the perl-doc installation has always been pretty trivial.



      My question is: does the package requiring ldconfig to be in PATH is reasonable (therefore my mistake and I need to get used to su - from now on) or is this bad practice from the packaging process and therefore a bug?




      debian packaging




      share|improve this question











      I encountered the following error while trying to install perl-doc:



      $ su
      Password:
      # apt-get install perl-doc


      <snip>



      Get:1 http://ftp.br.debian.org/debian testing/main amd64 perl-doc all 5.26.2-6 [7,429 kB]
      Fetched 7,429 kB in 4s (1,721 kB/s) 
      dpkg: warning: 'ldconfig' not found in PATH or not executable
      dpkg: warning: 'start-stop-daemon' not found in PATH or not executable
      dpkg: error: 2 expected programs not found in PATH or not executable
      Note: root's PATH should usually contain /usr/local/sbin, /usr/sbin and /sbin
      E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (2)


      Granted, the solution was obvious:



      # exit
      $ su -
      Password:
      # apt-get install perl-doc


      However, I have always installed with a simple su. And the perl-doc installation has always been pretty trivial.



      My question is: does the package requiring ldconfig to be in PATH is reasonable (therefore my mistake and I need to get used to su - from now on) or is this bad practice from the packaging process and therefore a bug?





      debian packaging





      share|improve this question










      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question









      asked yesterday









      giusti

      600217




      600217

























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer







          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "106"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f460593%2ferror-installing-perl-doc-bug-or-poor-usage%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






















          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes










           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f460593%2ferror-installing-perl-doc-bug-or-poor-usage%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest
































































          -

          Popular posts from this blog

          How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

          Image
          Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this question asked Sep 26 at 0:12 ToanLuong 49 9 add a comment  |  up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this questi...
          Read more

          Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

          Image
          Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP 1 How can I extract a single band from multi-band raster in QGIS? I have an remote sensed image which has 6 bands (including NDVI band), I want to display each band separately, but have no idea how to do. I have seen some questions similar here but none worked for me. The original image (has 6 bands) is: I want to display the band 6 which should be like this: But I tried gdal_translate, and couldn't get the correct result. What I have got is: qgis raster multi-band share | improve this question edited Mar 5 at 0:53 Summer asked Mar 4 at 6:42 Summer Summer 23 6 Is this any help gis.stackexchange.com/questions/220658/… ? if not gis.stackexchange.com/questions/62133/… might help. – Michael Stimson Mar 4 at 6:46 Thanks for answering but when I used gdal_translate, qgis showed that 'Error 4: Kayena.tif: No such file or directory". Would you know how to fi...
          Read more

          How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?

          Image
          Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 2 down vote favorite I am currently learning reverse engineering and am studying the flags register. I had in my mind that rflags was just another name for one of the 16 general purpose registers, for example rax or rbx . But it looks like rflags is actually an additional register. So that makes 17 registers in total... how many more could there be? I have spent at least an hour on this and found numerous different answers. The best answer so far is this, which says that there are 40 registers in total. 16 General Purpose Registers 2 Status Registers 6 Code Segment Registers 16 SSE Registers 8 FPU/MMX Registers But if I add that up, I get 48. Could anybody provide an official answer on how many registers an x86_64 CPU has (e.g. an Intel i7). Additionally, I have seen references to 'hardware' and 'architectural' registers. What are those registers and how many are there? register x86-64 share | improve this...
          Read more